From traditional production to low-carbon transformation: the impact of the digital economy on agricultural carbon emissions
Fuchun Yang · Chen Luo · Jinbo Du
研究数字经济对农业碳排放的影响,发现其能显著降低本地及邻域碳排放。
基于2011-2021年中国省级面板数据,采用固定效应、SYS-GMM和空间杜宾
数字经济通过农业技术创新和全要素生产率提升降低碳排放,且具有空间溢出效应和区域异质性。
可进一步探究数字经济影响农业碳排放的行业细分机制,或结合微观农户数据验证其作用路径。
基于省级面板数据的实证研究,揭示数字经济对农业碳减排的本地与空间溢出效应,为低碳农业政策提供依据。
Introduction The rapid development of the digital economy is reshaping traditional agricultural production models, providing new opportunities for low-carbon agricultural transformation. However, the mechanisms through which the digital economy affects agricultural carbon emissions remain underexplored. Methods Based on panel data from 30 Chinese provinces during 2011–2021, this study employs a fixed-effects model, the SYS-GMM model, and a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) to systematically examine the impact of DE on agricultural carbon emissions (ACE) from both local mitigation and spatial spillover perspectives. Results DE significantly reduces ACE within the region, with agricultural technological innovation and improvements in agricultural total factor productivity serving as important transmission mechanisms through which the emission reduction is achieved. Furthermore, the development of DE also exerts a significant inhibitory effect on carbon emissions in neighboring regions, thereby promoting coordinated regional emission reduction. Moreover, the carbon reduction effect exhibits significant regional heterogeneity, with stronger total effects observed in eastern and central regions as well as in areas with higher levels of large-scale agricultural operation. Discussion This study reveals the dual role of DE in facilitating local emission reduction and regional low-carbon coordination, thereby extending the research perspective on the relationship between DE and agricultural lowcarbon transformation. The findings also provide important policy implications for promoting green and low-carbon agricultural development and strengthening regional collaborative governance.