[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1401":3,"related-1401":90},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":69,"slug":72,"view_count":20,"doi":73,"paper":74,"created_at":89},1401,"Evaluating the Meaningful Participation of Smart Villages in Industry 4.0 Ecosystems in Sub-Saharan Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.51137\u002Fwrp.ijarbm.753","The study seeks to examine, through a literature review, the level of participation and impact of smart villages in Sub-Saharan Africa. The smart village initiative has the potential to alleviate poverty in rural areas and reduce the rural-urban migration challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Given that Africa has the world's fastest-growing youth population. A total of 29 articles were included in this study following the PRISMA inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study observed that a few smart village initiatives had been implemented in Sub-Saharan Africa. Emphasis is mostly on climate-smart agriculture aimed at alleviating rural poverty and adaptation to climate change. There are challenges in implementing the smart village initiatives, such as a lack of supportive policies, poor infrastructure, lack of electricity, technologies and finances. The success of climate-smart agriculture is necessary for the transition to smart villages, as agriculture is the backbone of most villages in SSA. Collaborations between universities, technology owners and villagers are essential for the successful implementation of smart villages in SSA.","本研究旨在通过文献综述，探讨撒哈拉以南非洲地区智慧乡村的参与程度及其影响。智慧乡村倡议有潜力缓解该地区农村贫困问题，并减少城乡迁移带来的挑战，尤其是在非洲拥有全球增长最快的青年人口的背景下。依据PRISMA纳入与排除标准，本研究共纳入29篇文章。研究发现，撒哈拉以南非洲地区已实施的智慧乡村倡议数量有限，重点多集中于气候智慧农业，旨在缓解农村贫困并适应气候变化。然而，智慧乡村倡议的实施面临诸多挑战，如缺乏支持性政策、基础设施薄弱、电力供应不足、技术及资金匮乏等。鉴于农业是撒哈拉以南非洲大多数乡村的支柱产业，气候智慧农业的成功是实现向智慧乡村过渡的关键。大学、技术所有者与村民之间的合作对于撒哈拉以南非洲智慧乡村的成功实施至关重要。",null,"International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management","2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,53,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":13,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},12,15,14,2,1,"系统综述非洲智慧乡村参与工业4.0的现状与挑战，对国内数字乡村建设有比较参考价值，但时效性较低。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29],"数字乡村","撒哈拉以南非洲","气候智慧农业","智慧乡村",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,51,59,64],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":50},7,true,[],[48,49],"气候变化","climate change",[28],{"code":52,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":54,"abstract":55,"tags":58},"I1",6,[],[56,57],"智慧农业","smart agriculture",[],{"code":60,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":61,"abstract":62,"tags":63},"I6",[],[],[26],{"code":65,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":66,"abstract":67,"tags":68},"J3",[],[],[27],[70,71],"撒哈拉以南非洲 气候智慧农业 数字乡村 智慧乡村","撒哈拉以南非洲 气候智慧农业","撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧农业数字乡村智慧乡村-1401","10.51137\u002Fwrp.ijarbm.753",{"doi":73,"openalex_id":75,"authors":76,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":80,"card":81,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7204867376",[77],{"name":78,"orcid":9},"Wlifreda Chawarura",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wr-publishing.org\u002Findex.php\u002Fijarbm\u002Farticle\u002Fdownload\u002F753\u002F737",{"tldr":82,"method":83,"finding":84,"direction":85,"opportunity":86},"通过文献综述评估撒哈拉以南非洲智慧村在工业4.0中的参与度与影响。","PRISMA方法筛选29篇文献进行综述分析。","智慧村项目少，侧重气候智慧农业，面临政策、基础设施等挑战。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究如何通过多方合作克服基础设施和政策障碍，推动智慧村在非洲的规模化实施。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-02T23:30:09.789913Z",{"total":53,"page":21,"page_size":53,"items":91},[92,192,254,310,398,469],{"id":93,"title":94,"url":95,"summary":96,"summary_zh":97,"content":9,"source_name":98,"source_url":95,"published_at":99,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":100,"is_selected":14,"score":101,"score_detail":102,"sources":107,"tags":111,"primary_topic":115,"secondary_topics":121,"classification":128,"search_phrases":175,"slug":178,"view_count":21,"doi":179,"paper":180,"created_at":191},4739,"Regenerating Rural Futures Through Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations: A Systems Perspective on Building Climate Resilience, Food Security and Inclusive Rural Prosperity in Nigeria","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298251","Rural Nigeria stands at a defining crossroads. Although agriculture remains central to national food security, employment and rural livelihoods, the ecological, economic and institutional systems that sustain agricultural production are under increasing pressure. Climate variability, land degradation, biodiversity loss, demographic change, market volatility and institutional constraints are interacting in ways that threaten both agricultural productivity and the resilience of rural communities. These challenges are deeply interconnected and cannot be addressed through isolated sectoral interventions or yield-focused agricultural policies alone. This paper examines the regeneration of rural futures through the lens of Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA), arguing that CSA should be understood not merely as a collection of improved farming practices but as an integrated systems framework for rural transformation. Drawing upon contemporary scholarship in climate science, agricultural development, resilience studies, ecological restoration, rural sociology and institutional governance, the paper explores how climate-smart approaches can contribute simultaneously to agricultural productivity, climate resilience, environmental sustainability and inclusive rural prosperity. Focusing on Nigeria, the analysis examines the country’s diverse agroecological zones, evolving climate risks, smallholder farming systems, demographic transitions and institutional landscape. The paper demonstrates that effective climate-smart strategies must be locally adaptive while remaining aligned with nationally coherent development objectives. It argues that Nigeria’s long-term agricultural competitiveness will depend less on expanding cultivated land and more on improving the resilience, productivity and sustainability of existing farming systems through knowledge-intensive innovation, ecosystem restoration, digital technologies, strengthened rural institutions and integrated value chain development. The paper further contends that sustainable rural transformation requires moving beyond fragmented development projects towards Rural Resilience Ecosystems in which agriculture, environmental management, community institutions, infrastructure, digital technologies, enterprise development and knowledge systems function as mutually reinforcing components of a coherent development strategy. Within this framework, the Climate-Smart Farmer Hub is presented as an operational example of how climate-smart agriculture, rural innovation, environmental stewardship and community capacity development can be integrated within locally responsive institutional systems that support broader national objectives for sustainable agricultural transformation and climate resilience. The paper concludes that Regenerating Rural Futures provides a useful systems-oriented paradigm for understanding how ecological integrity, economic opportunity, institutional effectiveness and community wellbeing can be strengthened simultaneously. By integrating contemporary scholarship with the realities of Nigerian agriculture and an original community-centred institutional framework, the study contributes an evidence-informed analytical perspective for advancing climate-smart agriculture, rural resilience and sustainable rural transformation in Nigeria and comparable development contexts.","尼日利亚农村正处在一个决定性的十字路口。尽管农业仍然是国家粮食安全、就业和农村生计的核心，但支撑农业生产的生态、经济和制度体系正面临日益增大的压力。气候变率、土地退化、生物多样性丧失、人口变化、市场波动和制度约束相互交织，威胁着农业生产力和农村社区的韧性。这些挑战深度关联，无法仅通过孤立的部门干预或以产量为导向的农业政策加以解决。本文从气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）的视角审视农村未来的再生，主张CSA不应仅被理解为一系列改良农业实践的集合，而应被视为农村转型的综合系统框架。本文借鉴气候科学、农业发展、韧性研究、生态恢复、农村社会学和制度治理领域的当代学术成果，探讨气候智慧型方法如何能够同时促进农业生产力、气候韧性、环境可持续性和包容性农村繁荣。以尼日利亚为焦点，本文分析了该国多样的农业生态区、不断演变的气候风险、小农耕作系统、人口转型和制度格局。本文表明，有效的气候智慧型战略必须具有地方适应性，同时与国家连贯的发展目标保持一致。本文认为，尼日利亚的长期农业竞争力将较少取决于扩大耕地面积，而更多取决于通过知识密集型创新、生态系统恢复、数字技术、强化的农村机构和综合价值链发展来提升现有耕作系统的韧性、生产力和可持续性。本文进一步主张，可持续的农村转型需要超越碎片化的发展项目，迈向农村韧性生态系统，在这一系统中，农业、环境管理、社区机构、基础设施、数字技术、企业发展 and 知识体系作为连贯发展战略中相互强化的组成部分发挥作用。在这一框架内，气候智慧型农民中心（Climate-Smart Farmer Hub）作为一个操作实例被提出，展示气候智","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",25,78,{"impact":103,"substance":104,"depth":105,"authority":17,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":106},18,21,17,"以系统视角论述尼日利亚气候智慧农业与农村韧性建设，提出社区型制度框架，具参考价值但属境外研究。",[108,109],{"name":98,"url":95},{"name":98,"url":110},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298250",[26,112,28,113,114],"农业数字化","小农韧性","农村转型",{"code":116,"slug":117,"name":118,"path":119,"parent_code":120},"A8","yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security","A",[122,123],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"code":124,"slug":125,"name":126,"path":127,"parent_code":35},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity",{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":129},{"candidates":130,"agricultural_evidence":45},[131,137,142,146,153,160,166,171],{"code":116,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":132,"abstract":134,"tags":136},[133],"food security",[135,133],"粮食安全",[],{"code":31,"score":17,"supported":45,"title":138,"abstract":140,"tags":141},[139],"climate resilience",[139],[28],{"code":52,"score":17,"supported":45,"title":143,"abstract":144,"tags":145},[57],[57],[112],{"code":124,"score":147,"supported":45,"title":148,"abstract":149,"tags":152},9,[],[150,151,125],"生物多样性","农业生态",[],{"code":154,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":156,"abstract":157,"tags":159},"G2",3,[],[158],"smallholder",[],{"code":161,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":162,"abstract":163,"tags":165},"J1",[],[164],"农业政策",[],{"code":167,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":168,"abstract":169,"tags":170},"I",[],[],[112],{"code":60,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":172,"abstract":173,"tags":174},[],[],[26],[176,177],"尼日利亚 气候智慧农业","气候智慧农业 农业数字化 农村转型 小农韧性","尼日利亚气候智慧农业-4739","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298251",{"doi":179,"openalex_id":181,"authors":182,"venue":98,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":95,"card":185,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7221462831",[183],{"name":184,"orcid":9},"Franklin N. Ellah",{"tldr":186,"method":187,"finding":188,"direction":189,"opportunity":190},"本文从系统视角探讨气候智慧型农业如何推动尼日利亚农村再生，兼顾气候韧性、粮食安全与包容性繁荣。","基于气候科学、农业发展、韧性研究等多学科文献，结合尼日利亚农业生态区与制度分析。","气候智慧型农业应作为整合系统框架，通过知识创新、数字技术、生态修复与制度强化提升现有系统韧性。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究气候智慧型农业系统框架在不同农业生态区的本地化适配与数字技术赋能机制。","2026-10-12T23:30:07.631373Z",{"id":193,"title":194,"url":195,"summary":196,"summary_zh":197,"content":9,"source_name":198,"source_url":195,"published_at":199,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":101,"score_detail":200,"sources":203,"tags":205,"primary_topic":208,"secondary_topics":209,"classification":210,"search_phrases":231,"slug":234,"view_count":79,"doi":235,"paper":236,"created_at":253},4493,"Policy and institutional drivers of climate-smart agriculture transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of governance, regulation, and institutional support with implications for South Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffclim.2026.1891365","Climate change continues to intensify agricultural vulnerability in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), threatening food security, rural livelihoods, and sustainable agrifood systems through increasing droughts, floods, land degradation, and erratic rainfall patterns. Although Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) has emerged as a strategic approach for improving agricultural productivity, resilience, and environmental sustainability, its implementation across SSA remains uneven and constrained by weak governance systems, fragmented policies, inadequate institutional support, and limited stakeholder coordination. Existing studies have largely focused on technological and agronomic dimensions of CSA, with insufficient attention given to the governance and institutional factors influencing CSA transition. This study, therefore, conducted a scoping review to examine the policy and institutional drivers of CSA transition in SSA, with emphasis on governance systems, regulatory frameworks, and institutional support mechanisms. The study adopted the PRISMA-ScR scoping review framework and systematically reviewed 21 eligible studies obtained from major academic databases and institutional repositories published between 2010 and 2026. Thematic content analysis was employed to synthesize evidence on governance systems, institutional arrangements, policy coherence, climate finance, extension services, and stakeholder partnerships influencing CSA implementation. The findings revealed that effective CSA transition depends significantly on coherent policies, institutional coordination, extension systems, climate financing, land governance, and inclusive multi-stakeholder partnerships. However, institutional fragmentation, weak policy integration, inadequate financing, poor extension services, and insecure land tenure systems remain major barriers constraining CSA adoption in SSA. The study recommends strengthening policy coherence, institutional capacity, decentralized governance systems, climate financing mechanisms, and participatory governance approaches to enhance climate-resilient agricultural transformation across Sub-Saharan Africa.","气候变化持续加剧撒哈拉以南非洲（Sub-Saharan Africa, SSA）的农业脆弱性，通过日益频发的干旱、洪水、土地退化及不稳定的降雨模式，威胁粮食安全、农村生计和可持续农食系统。尽管气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）已成为提升农业生产力、韧性和环境可持续性的战略路径，但其在撒哈拉以南非洲的实施仍不均衡，并受到治理体系薄弱、政策碎片化、制度支持不足及利益相关方协调有限的制约。现有研究多聚焦于气候智慧型农业的技术与农艺维度，而对影响其转型的治理与制度因素关注不足。因此，本研究开展范围综述，考察撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧型农业转型的政策与制度驱动因素，重点关注治理体系、监管框架和制度支持机制。研究采用PRISMA-ScR范围综述框架，系统审查了2010年至2026年间从主要学术数据库和机构知识库获取的21项符合条件的研究。运用主题内容分析法，综合了关于治理体系、制度安排、政策一致性、气候融资、推广服务和利益相关方伙伴关系对气候智慧型农业实施影响的证据。研究结果表明，有效的气候智慧型农业转型在很大程度上依赖于连贯的政策、制度协调、推广体系、气候融资、土地治理和包容性多利益相关方伙伴关系。然而，制度碎片化、政策整合薄弱、融资不足、推广服务欠缺及土地权属不安全仍是制约撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧型农业采纳的主要障碍。研究建议加强政策一致性、制度能力、分权治理体系、气候融资机制和参与式治理方法，以促进撒哈拉以南非洲的气候韧性农业转型。","Frontiers in Climate","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",{"impact":103,"substance":104,"depth":105,"authority":201,"freshness":147,"relevant":21,"comment":202},13,"基于PRISMA-ScR的21篇文献综述，系统梳理SSA气候智慧农业的政策与制度驱动因素，对南非及非洲农业治理有参考价值，但属区域研究、非国内三农信息化直接相关。",[204],{"name":198,"url":195},[27,164,28,206,207],"土地治理","气候融资",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":211},{"candidates":212,"agricultural_evidence":45},[213,218,223,227],{"code":52,"score":214,"supported":45,"title":215,"abstract":216,"tags":217},11,[57],[57],[],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":219,"abstract":220,"tags":222},[],[48,221,49],"干旱",[28],{"code":116,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":224,"abstract":225,"tags":226},[],[135,133],[],{"code":65,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":228,"abstract":229,"tags":230},[],[],[27],[232,233],"气候智慧农业 撒哈拉以南非洲","CSA 治理 制度支持","气候智慧农业撒哈拉以南非洲-4493","10.3389\u002Ffclim.2026.1891365",{"doi":235,"openalex_id":237,"authors":238,"venue":198,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":195,"card":248,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7221037154",[239,242,245],{"name":240,"orcid":241},"Adetomiwa Kolapo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0808-1293",{"name":243,"orcid":244},"Melusi Sibanda","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6296-7079",{"name":246,"orcid":247},"Nolwazi Zanele Khumalo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7504-6703",{"tldr":249,"method":250,"finding":251,"direction":189,"opportunity":252},"通过范围综述梳理撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧型农业转型的政策与制度驱动因素及障碍。","采用PRISMA-ScR框架系统综述2010—2026年21项研究，做主题内容分","政策协调、制度协同、推广服务、气候融资和土地治理是关键驱动力，制度碎片化与融资不足是主要障碍。","可量化评估治理与制度因素对CSA采纳的影响，并比较南非与撒哈拉以南非洲其他国家的政策协同差异。","2026-10-09T23:30:08.200483Z",{"id":255,"title":256,"url":257,"summary":258,"summary_zh":259,"content":9,"source_name":260,"source_url":257,"published_at":261,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":262,"score_detail":263,"sources":266,"tags":268,"primary_topic":272,"secondary_topics":273,"classification":274,"search_phrases":294,"slug":296,"view_count":21,"doi":297,"paper":298,"created_at":309},1397,"Gender-responsive climate-smart agriculture: a scoping review of equity, access, and participation in adaptation programs in sub-Saharan Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffrsus.2026.1902768","Climate change poses significant threats to agricultural productivity, food security, and rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), with women disproportionately affected due to persistent inequalities in access to productive resources, climate information, and adaptation opportunities. Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) has been widely promoted as a strategy for enhancing agricultural resilience; however, evidence on its gender responsiveness remains fragmented. This study conducted a scoping review to systematically map and synthesize the literature on gender-responsive CSA interventions, focusing on equity, access, participation, empowerment, and adaptation outcomes in SSA. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), literature published between 2010 and 2026 was identified from major bibliographic databases and grey literature sources. Of 525 records retrieved, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized using descriptive and thematic analyses. From the study, the evidence indicates that gender-responsive CSA interventions improve women’s access to knowledge, extension services, financial resources, and leadership opportunities, contributing to enhanced adaptive capacity and household resilience. However, the review also identified mixed outcomes, with several studies reporting that persistent socio-cultural norms, insecure land tenure, limited institutional support, unequal decision-making power, and weak policy implementation constrained women’s empowerment and reduced the effectiveness of CSA interventions. Important knowledge gaps include limited longitudinal evidence, inadequate intersectional analyses, underrepresentation of West and Central Africa, and insufficient evaluation of institutional accountability. The review concludes that achieving inclusive climate adaptation requires a transition from gender-responsive to gender-transformative CSA approaches that address structural inequalities, strengthen governance systems, and promote equitable access to resources, decision-making, and adaptation benefits across Sub-Saharan Africa.","气候变化对撒哈拉以南非洲（SSA）的农业生产率、粮食安全和农村生计构成重大威胁，其中女性因在获取生产性资源、气候信息和适应机会方面长期存在的不平等而受到尤为严重的影响。气候智能型农业（CSA）已被广泛推广为增强农业韧性的策略，然而关于其性别响应性的证据仍较为零散。本研究开展了一项范围综述，系统性地梳理和综合了关于性别响应型CSA干预措施的文献，重点关注撒哈拉以南非洲地区的公平性、获取机会、参与、赋权及适应成效。本研究以系统综述和荟萃分析优先报告条目扩展版——范围综述（PRISMA-ScR）为指南，从主要文献数据库和灰色文献来源中检索了2010年至2026年间发表的文献。在检索到的525条记录中，有23项研究符合纳入标准，并采用描述性分析和主题分析进行综合。研究结果表明，性别响应型CSA干预措施改善了女性获取知识、推广服务、财政资源和领导机会的途径，有助于增强其适应能力和家庭韧性。然而，本综述也发现了不一致的结果，多项研究报告指出，持续存在的社会文化规范、不稳定的土地权属、有限的机构支持、不平等的决策权力以及薄弱的政策执行制约了女性赋权，并降低了CSA干预措施的有效性。重要的知识空白包括：纵向证据有限、交叉性分析不足、西非和中非地区的代表性欠缺，以及对机构问责制的评估不够充分。本综述得出结论：实现包容性气候适应需要从性别响应型向性别变革型CSA方法转变，以解决结构性不平等问题，加强治理体系，并促进撒哈拉以南非洲地区在资源获取、决策参与和适应收益方面的公平分配。","Frontiers in Sustainability","2026-09-02T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":103,"substance":264,"depth":103,"authority":17,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":265},22,"系统综述揭示性别响应型气候智慧农业在撒哈拉以南非洲的成效与障碍，对农业适应政策有参考价值。",[267],{"name":260,"url":257},[269,27,28,270,271],"系统综述","性别平等","农业适应",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":275},{"candidates":276,"agricultural_evidence":45},[277,281,286,290],{"code":52,"score":214,"supported":45,"title":278,"abstract":279,"tags":280},[57],[57],[],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":282,"abstract":283,"tags":285},[],[48,284,49],"气候适应",[28],{"code":116,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":287,"abstract":288,"tags":289},[],[135,133],[],{"code":65,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":291,"abstract":292,"tags":293},[],[],[27],[295,71],"撒哈拉以南非洲 气候智慧农业 农业适应 性别平等","撒哈拉以南非洲气候智慧农业农业适应性别平等-1397","10.3389\u002Ffrsus.2026.1902768",{"doi":297,"openalex_id":299,"authors":300,"venue":260,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":257,"card":304,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7204991613",[301,302],{"name":240,"orcid":9},{"name":303,"orcid":9},"Funso Omolayo Alabuja",{"tldr":305,"method":306,"finding":307,"direction":189,"opportunity":308},"系统综述撒哈拉以南非洲性别响应型气候智慧农业，评估公平、获取与参与。","采用PRISMA-ScR框架，检索2010-2026年文献，筛选23项研究进行描","性别响应型CSA改善女性资源获取，但社会文化规范、土地权属等限制效果，需转向变革性方法。","研究空白：缺乏纵向证据和交叉分析，西非和中非代表性不足，可探索性别变革性CSA的治理机制。","2026-09-02T23:30:09.578760Z",{"id":311,"title":312,"url":313,"summary":314,"summary_zh":315,"content":9,"source_name":316,"source_url":313,"published_at":317,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":318,"score_detail":319,"sources":322,"tags":324,"primary_topic":328,"secondary_topics":329,"classification":336,"search_phrases":376,"slug":379,"view_count":79,"doi":380,"paper":381,"created_at":397},5478,"Characterisation of Food Security Situation for Smallholder Farmers in Zvimba","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30","This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the food security situation among smallholder farmers (SHFs) in Zvimba District, Zimbabwe. Smallholder agriculture is the bedrock of Zimbabwe's food system, yet it remains highly vulnerable to a complex array of shocks and stressors. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research investigates the prevalence, drivers and lived experiences of food insecurity within this community. A structured survey was administered to 412 randomly selected smallholder households across the district's wards. The quantitative data were supplemented by 12 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 24 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with farmers, community leaders and agricultural extension officers to capture qualitative nuances. The study is grounded in the Food Security Theory (FST), which conceptualises food security through its four pillars: food availability, food access, food utilisation and food stability. Findings reveal a precarious food security situation. Quantitatively, 78.4% of households were found to be food insecure, with an average Hunger Months Index of 4.7 months per year. The study identifies a significant disconnect between maize production, the national staple and household consumption, with over 65% of households failing to produce enough maize to meet their annual requirements. Qualitative data illuminated the multi-faceted drivers of this insecurity. Key points to note include climate change whereby erratic rainfall and prolonged mid-season dry spells were consistently reported as the primary production challenges, limited access to farming inputs whereby high costs and unreliable supplies of certified seeds, fertilizers and agro[1]chemicals constrain productivity. Morelso, socio-economic factors such as poverty, lack of viable alternative livelihoods and limited access to formal credit perpetuate a cycle of vulnerability. In addition, institutional weaknesses, for example, challenges with agricultural extension services and market inefficiencies, exacerbate the situation. The study concludes that food insecurity in Zvimba is not merely a problem of food production, but is deeply rooted in structural issues affecting food access, food utilisation, as well as food stability. Recommendations are proposed for a multi-sectoral approach, including promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) and drought-resistant crops, strengthening input support systems and rural finance, diversifying livelihood strategies and enhancing the capacity of extension services. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the localised dynamics of food security and provides evidence-based guidance for policymakers, development practitioners and the farmers of Zvimba themselves.","本研究对津巴布韦兹维姆巴区小农户（smallholder farmers, SHFs）的粮食安全状况进行了全面分析。小农农业是津巴布韦粮食体系的基石，但仍极易受到一系列复杂冲击和压力的影响。本研究采用混合方法，考察了该社区粮食不安全的普遍程度、驱动因素及生活体验。研究对该区各选区随机抽取的412户小农户进行了结构化问卷调查。定量数据辅以12次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）和24次关键知情人访谈（KIIs），访谈对象包括农民、社区领袖和农业推广人员，以捕捉定性层面的细微差异。本研究以粮食安全理论（Food Security Theory, FST）为基础，该理论通过四大支柱界定粮食安全：粮食可供性、粮食获取、粮食利用和粮食稳定性。研究结果揭示了严峻的粮食安全形势。定量数据显示，78.4%的家庭存在粮食不安全，年均饥饿月份指数为4.7个月。研究发现，玉米产量——该国主粮——与家庭消费之间存在显著脱节，超过65%的家庭生产的玉米不足以满足其年度需求。定性数据揭示了这一不安全状况的多重驱动因素。值得注意的要点包括：气候变化，即降雨不稳定和持续的中期干旱被一致报告为主要生产挑战；农业投入品获取受限，即认证种子、化肥和农用化学品成本高昂且供应不可靠，制约了生产力。此外，贫困、缺乏可行的替代生计以及正规信贷获取受限等社会经济因素使脆弱性循环持续存在。此外，制度薄弱环节，例如农业推广服务面临的挑战和市场效率低下，加剧了这一状况。研究得出结论，兹维姆巴的粮食不安全不仅仅是粮食生产问题，而是深深植根于影响粮食获取、粮食利用以及粮食稳定性的结构性问题。研究提出了采取多部门方法的建议，包括推广气候智能型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）和抗旱作物、加强投入品支持体系和农村金融、多样化生计策略以及增强","Ngenani The Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti Journal of Community Engagement and Societal Transformations","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",55,{"impact":320,"substance":103,"depth":18,"authority":53,"freshness":320,"relevant":21,"comment":321},8,"基于412户调查与混合方法的扎实实证研究，但属津巴布韦地方性案例，公共影响与信源权威度有限，可作参考而非每日精选。",[323],{"name":316,"url":313},[135,325,28,326,327],"小农户","农业推广","津巴布韦",{"code":116,"slug":117,"name":118,"path":119,"parent_code":120},[330,335],{"code":154,"slug":331,"name":332,"path":333,"parent_code":334},"farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":337},{"candidates":338,"agricultural_evidence":45},[339,343,347,352,358,365,372],{"code":116,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":340,"abstract":341,"tags":342},[133],[135,133],[135],{"code":154,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":344,"abstract":345,"tags":346},[158],[325,158],[325],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":348,"abstract":349,"tags":351},[],[48,221,49,350],"drought",[28],{"code":353,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":354,"abstract":355,"tags":357},"G1",[],[326,356],"agricultural extension",[326],{"code":359,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":360,"abstract":361,"tags":364},"A3",[],[362,363],"玉米","maize",[],{"code":366,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":367,"abstract":368,"tags":371},"G3",[],[369,370],"农村金融","rural finance",[],{"code":52,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":373,"abstract":374,"tags":375},[],[57],[],[377,378],"Zvimba 小农户 粮食安全","津巴布韦 小农 玉米","Zvimba小农户粮食安全-5478","10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30",{"doi":380,"openalex_id":382,"authors":383,"venue":316,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":9,"card":392,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7223029383",[384,387,390],{"name":385,"orcid":386},"Casper Myambo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-8625-7526",{"name":388,"orcid":389},"Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4123-0238",{"name":391,"orcid":9},"Patience Mutopo",{"tldr":393,"method":394,"finding":395,"direction":85,"opportunity":396},"调查津巴布韦Zvimba小农户粮食安全状况，分析其普遍性、成因与实际体验。","混合方法：412户问卷、12场焦点小组、24个关键人物访谈，基于粮食安全四支柱理","78.4%家庭粮食不安全，年均饥饿月4.7个月，主因是气候、投入、社会经济与制度等结构性问题。","可探索用移动端问卷与遥感产量监测构建小农户粮食安全动态预警与精准干预系统。","2026-10-21T23:30:08.937079Z",{"id":399,"title":400,"url":401,"summary":402,"summary_zh":403,"content":9,"source_name":404,"source_url":401,"published_at":317,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":405,"score_detail":406,"sources":410,"tags":412,"primary_topic":417,"secondary_topics":418,"classification":419,"search_phrases":449,"slug":452,"view_count":79,"doi":453,"paper":454,"created_at":468},5473,"Can regional value-chain integration decouple China's agri-food export growth from production-side direct CO2 attributed to export domestic value added? Evidence from belt and road partner economies","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1977325","This study examines whether regional value-chain (RVC) integration can support agri-food export growth while improving the carbon performance of China's export sectors. We build a 2007–2023 bilateral country–industry–year panel for C01 agriculture, forestry, and fishing and C03 food processing across 39 economies currently classified as Belt and Road partners. Asian Development Bank multi-regional input–output tables identify bilateral value-added paths, while Chinese sectoral fossil-energy data and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission factors are used to measure production-side direct fossil-energy CO 2 attributed to export domestic value added. The analysis combines logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition, fixed-effects models, an external shift-share instrument, value-chain configuration tests, and a within–between decomposition. Four findings stand out. First, long-run carbon-intensity improvement more than offsets cumulative scale and structural pressures. Second, the baseline fixed-effects and IV estimates show a negative overall association between RVC cooperation and absolute production-side direct CO 2 , and this relationship remains negative in post-2013 samples. Third, within established partner–industry relationships, deeper RVC is significantly associated with lower carbon per unit of exports, while the export-scale and absolute-carbon coefficients are statistically insignificant. Fourth, denser two-way embedment is associated with higher carbon pressure, a more forward-oriented structure with lower carbon, and deep cooperation with a higher carbon association than shallow cooperation. The results suggest that climate-smart agri-food integration should combine production-efficiency gains with forward-oriented domestic value creation and careful monitoring of the scale effects of deeper production networks.","本研究考察区域价值链（RVC）整合能否在促进农食产品出口增长的同时改善中国出口部门的碳绩效。我们构建了2007—2023年双边国家—行业—年份面板数据，涵盖目前被归类为“一带一路”伙伴的39个经济体中的C01农、林、渔业和C03食品加工业。亚洲开发银行多区域投入产出表用于识别双边增加值路径，中国部门化石能源数据和政府间气候变化专门委员会排放因子用于测算出口国内增加值所对应的生产侧直接化石能源CO₂。分析结合了对数平均迪氏指数分解、固定效应模型、外部移动份额工具变量、价值链构型检验以及组内—组间分解。有四項发现尤为突出。第一，长期碳强度的改善足以抵消累积的规模压力和结构压力。第二，基准固定效应和IV估计显示，RVC合作与绝对生产侧直接CO₂总体上呈负相关，且这一关系在2013年之后的样本中仍为负。第三，在既有的伙伴—行业关系中，更深的RVC与单位出口碳含量较低显著相关，而出口规模和绝对碳的系数在统计上不显著。第四，更密集的双向嵌入与更高的碳压力相关，更偏向前的结构与更低的碳相关，深度合作比浅层合作具有更高的碳关联。结果表明，气候智慧型农食一体化应将生产效率提升与偏向前的国内价值创造相结合，并审慎监测更深生产网络的规模效应。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems",79,{"impact":407,"substance":264,"depth":408,"authority":201,"freshness":147,"relevant":21,"comment":409},16,19,"基于39个一带一路伙伴国2007–2023年面板数据，方法扎实、结论有新意，对农业绿色贸易政策有参考价值，但属学术论文，公共影响有限。",[411],{"name":404,"url":401},[413,414,28,415,416],"农业碳排放","一带一路","农产品贸易","全球价值链",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":420},{"candidates":421,"agricultural_evidence":45},[422,426,433,439,444],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":423,"abstract":424,"tags":425},[],[48,49],[28],{"code":427,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":428,"abstract":429,"tags":432},"E1",[],[430,431],"食品加工","food processing",[],{"code":434,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":435,"abstract":436,"tags":438},"D",[],[437],"渔业",[],{"code":440,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":441,"abstract":442,"tags":443},"E5",[],[],[415],{"code":445,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":446,"abstract":447,"tags":448},"H4",[],[],[413],[450,451],"中国 农食产品 出口 碳排放","一带一路 区域价值链","中国农食产品出口碳排放-5473","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1977325",{"doi":453,"openalex_id":455,"authors":456,"venue":404,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":401,"card":463,"direction":189,"ingested_from":88},"W7223067445",[457,459,461],{"name":458,"orcid":9},"Kunlin Tang",{"name":460,"orcid":9},"Wei Yang",{"name":462,"orcid":9},"Yuan Huang",{"tldr":464,"method":465,"finding":466,"direction":189,"opportunity":467},"研究区域价值链整合能否使中国农食出口增长与生产侧直接CO2脱钩。","2007–2023年39个一带一路经济体的双边面板，用ADB多区域投入产出表与L","长期碳强度改善抵消规模压力，RVC合作总体降低绝对CO2，但深度双向嵌入会推高碳压力。","可探究前向型国内增加值创造与深度生产网络的规模效应监测机制，识别气候智慧型农食整合路径。","2026-10-21T23:30:07.454815Z",{"id":470,"title":471,"url":472,"summary":473,"summary_zh":474,"content":9,"source_name":404,"source_url":472,"published_at":317,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":475,"score_detail":476,"sources":479,"tags":481,"primary_topic":486,"secondary_topics":491,"classification":497,"search_phrases":549,"slug":552,"view_count":79,"doi":553,"paper":554,"created_at":574},5472,"Turning dirt into gold: the business case of soil carbon for agrarian pathways in arid climate","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966265","Introduction Agricultural carbon sequestration offers considerable potential for mitigating anthropogenic climate change, particularly in the low-organic-carbon soils of the Middle East. This study presents a foundational scenario-based assessment of soil carbon sequestration and economic feasibility. Materials and methods Crop production and market datasets from Jordanian statistics (1998–2023) were used to estimate potential soil carbon sequestration and economic performance. Using benchmarks from literature in comparable agroecological regions, four soil carbon management practices were evaluated across multiple crops for their carbon storage potential using Monte Carlo uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity of economic performance was assessed under optimistic\u002Fpessimistic scenarios. Results Among the evaluated practices, the highest carbon sequestration rate was achieved through increased Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), reaching a maximum of 27.44 metric tons of CO₂ per hectare per year (tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear) under the high scenario for cucumbers. In contrast, barley showed the highest sequestration rate at 0.45 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear under increased SOC in the high scenario. Sensitivity analysis showed that ±20% uncertainty in the management coefficients resulted in practice-specific changes of 1.11 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear for increased SOC and 0.46 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear for improved cropland management. Horticultural crops, particularly cucumbers and lemons, exhibited the highest sequestration rates and strongest responses to management interventions. Field crops such as wheat, barley, and olives demonstrated lower, more stable sequestration rates. Economic analysis revealed that cucumbers, grapes, potatoes, and Open-field farming (OFF) tomatoes achieved the highest tri-pillar performance (net and adjusted profits and break-even cost) alongside effective carbon sequestration. These findings highlight that crop choice is a primary determinant of both crop profitability and sequestrated carbon potential and feasibility, with significant implications for climate-smart agriculture, carbon credit mechanisms, and intensification strategies in data-scarce regions. Study limitations While empirical field validation remains a future priority, this model-based study provides a screening-level theoretical baseline to guide targeted research and investment in arid agricultural systems.","引言 农业碳封存为缓解人为气候变化提供了可观潜力，尤其是在中东低有机碳土壤中。本研究提出了一项基于情景的土壤碳封存与经济学可行性基础评估。材料与方法 利用约旦统计数据（1998—2023年）中的作物生产和市场数据集，估算潜在的土壤碳封存及经济表现。参考可比农业生态区域文献中的基准值，采用蒙特卡洛不确定性分析和敏感性分析，评估了四种土壤碳管理措施在多种作物上的碳储存潜力。在乐观\u002F悲观情景下评估了经济表现的敏感性。结果 在评估的各项措施中，通过增加土壤有机碳（SOC）实现的碳封存速率最高，在黄瓜的高情景下达到最高27.44公吨二氧化碳\u002F公顷\u002F年（tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear）。相比之下，大麦在增加SOC的高情景下表现出最高的封存速率，为0.45 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear。敏感性分析表明，管理系数±20%的不确定性导致增加SOC和改善农田管理分别产生1.11 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear和0.46 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear的措施特异性变化。园艺作物，尤其是黄瓜和柠檬，表现出最高的封存速率和对管理干预的最强响应。小麦、大麦和橄榄等大田作物表现出较低但更稳定的封存速率。经济分析显示，黄瓜、葡萄、马铃薯和露地栽培（OFF）番茄在有效碳封存的同时实现了最高的三支柱表现（净利润、调整后利润和盈亏平衡成本）。这些发现突出表明，作物选择是作物盈利能力和封存碳潜力及可行性的主要决定因素，对气候智慧型农业、碳信用机制和数据稀缺地区的集约化策略具有重要意义。研究局限性 尽管田间实证验证仍是未来的优先事项，但这项基于模型的研究提供了筛选层面的理论基线，以指导干旱农业系统中的针对性研究和投资。",70,{"impact":17,"substance":477,"depth":407,"authority":201,"freshness":147,"relevant":21,"comment":478},20,"基于约旦1998–2023年统计数据的模型情景研究，量化了不同作物固碳速率与经济收益，对干旱区农业碳汇与碳信用机制有参考价值，但属区域性模拟研究，尚未经田间验证。",[480],{"name":404,"url":472},[28,482,483,484,485],"碳交易","干旱农业","土壤碳汇","作物选择",{"code":487,"slug":488,"name":489,"path":490,"parent_code":35},"H2","soil","土壤健康与改良","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsoil",[492,493],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"code":445,"slug":494,"name":495,"path":496,"parent_code":35},"carbon","农业碳与绿色低碳","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fcarbon",{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":498},{"candidates":499,"agricultural_evidence":45},[500,505,509,515,522,529,535,541,545],{"code":487,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":501,"abstract":502,"tags":504},[488],[503,488],"土壤",[],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":506,"abstract":507,"tags":508},[],[48,221,49],[28],{"code":445,"score":320,"supported":45,"title":510,"abstract":511,"tags":514},[],[512,513],"农业碳","carbon sequestration",[484,482],{"code":516,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":517,"abstract":518,"tags":521},"A2",[],[519,520],"小麦","wheat",[],{"code":523,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":524,"abstract":525,"tags":528},"B1",[],[526,527],"番茄","黄瓜",[],{"code":530,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":531,"abstract":532,"tags":534},"A5",[],[533],"马铃薯",[],{"code":536,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":537,"abstract":538,"tags":540},"B2",[],[539],"葡萄",[],{"code":124,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":542,"abstract":543,"tags":544},[],[151],[],{"code":52,"score":155,"supported":45,"title":546,"abstract":547,"tags":548},[],[57],[],[550,551],"约旦 土壤碳汇 黄瓜","土壤固碳 经济可行性","约旦土壤碳汇黄瓜-5472","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966265",{"doi":553,"openalex_id":555,"authors":556,"venue":404,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":472,"card":569,"direction":87,"ingested_from":88},"W7223064172",[557,559,561,564,566],{"name":558,"orcid":9},"Tasnim Althalaj",{"name":560,"orcid":9},"Ross. M. Thompson",{"name":562,"orcid":563},"Tala H. Qtaishat","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2700-6686",{"name":565,"orcid":9},"Dan Bumblauskas",{"name":567,"orcid":568},"Fayha Al-Shibli","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5628-0975",{"tldr":570,"method":571,"finding":572,"direction":189,"opportunity":573},"基于约旦1998–2023年数据，评估干旱区土壤固碳潜力与经济可行性。","用蒙特卡洛不确定性与敏感性分析，评估四种土壤碳管理措施在多作物下的表现。","黄瓜等园艺作物固碳率最高，作物选择是固碳与盈利的关键决定因素。","数据稀缺干旱区可结合田间验证与碳信用机制，研究作物级固碳经济激励设计。","2026-10-21T23:30:07.383006Z"]