[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2924":3,"related-2924":83},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":67,"slug":70,"view_count":71,"doi":72,"paper":73,"created_at":82},2924,"Climate-Smart Agriculture Package Combinations and Household Food and Nutrition Security among Smallholder Farmers in Southwestern Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11073051\u002Fv1","Climate-Smart Agriculture Package Combinations and Household Food and Nutrition Security among Smallholder Farmers in Southwestern Ethiopia。Research Square",null,"Research Square","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,56,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},8,18,15,6,9,1,"研究主题契合气候智慧型农业与小农户粮食安全，但属区域性论文且来源为预印本平台，公共影响与权威性有限，暂不建议进入每日精选。",[24],{"name":9,"url":6},[26,27,28,29],"粮食安全","小农户","气候智慧型农业","埃塞俄比亚",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,50,57,62],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":48,"tags":49},12,true,[47],"smallholder",[47],[27],{"code":51,"score":52,"supported":45,"title":53,"abstract":55,"tags":56},"I1",11,[54],"smart agriculture",[54],[],{"code":58,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":59,"abstract":60,"tags":61},"A8",[],[],[26],{"code":63,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":64,"abstract":65,"tags":66},"H7",[],[],[28],[68,69],"埃塞俄比亚 小农户 气候智慧型农业","气候智慧型农业 埃塞俄比亚 粮食安全 小农户","埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业-2924",4,"10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11073051\u002Fv1",{"doi":72,"openalex_id":74,"authors":75,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":6,"card":8,"direction":80,"ingested_from":81},"W7213535845",[76],{"name":77,"orcid":78},"Tesfaye Gafaro Ololo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-7838-5264",0,"智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-19T23:30:10.838601Z",{"total":19,"page":21,"page_size":19,"items":84},[85,147,244,352,417,484],{"id":86,"title":87,"url":88,"summary":89,"summary_zh":90,"content":8,"source_name":91,"source_url":88,"published_at":92,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":93,"score_detail":94,"sources":99,"tags":101,"primary_topic":104,"secondary_topics":105,"classification":106,"search_phrases":122,"slug":124,"view_count":79,"doi":125,"paper":126,"created_at":146},5105,"Behavioral Readiness for Climate‐Smart Agriculture Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers in Southwest Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071","ABSTRACT Understanding the behavioral mechanisms underlying farmers' readiness to adopt climate‐smart agriculture (CSA) is important for informing climate adaptation efforts. This study examines CSA adoption readiness among 384 smallholder farmers in Kaffa zone, Southwest Ethiopia, using covariance‐based structural equation modeling. The study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior by incorporating technology perceptions, previous CSA experience, risk aversion, and institutional support. The result shows attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control (PBC), perceived ease of use, previous CSA adoption experience, and institutional support were positively associated with CSA adoption readiness, whereas perceived usefulness and risk aversion were not significant. Perceived ease of use showed the strongest association with adoption intention ( β = 0.377, p = 0.001). Institutional support was positively associated with PBC ( β = 0.243, p \u003C 0.001) and future intention ( β = 0.112, p = 0.030), explaining 5.9% of variance in PBC and 41.4% of the variance in adoption readiness. PBC showed a significant indirect association between institutional support and future intention ( β = 0.058, p = 0.013; 95% bootstrap CI: 0.015–0.102), alongside a remaining direct association. The significant indirect association through perceived behavioral control suggests that farmers’ perceptions of their ability to implement CSA may represent an important pathway linking institutional support with adoption intentions. The findings highlight the relevance of integrating institutional support with efforts to strengthen farmers' perceived capability to implement CSA and to enhance behavioural readiness for future adoption.","摘要 理解农户采用气候智慧型农业（CSA）意愿背后的行为机制，对于为气候适应工作提供依据具有重要意义。本研究采用基于协方差的结构方程模型，考察了埃塞俄比亚西南部卡法地区384户小农户的CSA采用意愿。研究在计划行为理论的基础上，纳入了技术感知、既往CSA经验、风险规避和制度支持。结果表明，态度、主观规范、感知行为控制（PBC）、感知易用性、既往CSA采用经验和制度支持与CSA采用意愿呈正相关，而感知有用性和风险规避则不显著。感知易用性与采用意愿的关联最强（β = 0.377，p = 0.001）。制度支持与PBC（β = 0.243，p \u003C 0.001）和未来意愿（β = 0.112，p = 0.030）呈正相关，分别解释了PBC方差的5.9%和采用意愿方差的41.4%。PBC在制度支持与未来意愿之间表现出显著的间接关联（β = 0.058，p = 0.013；95% bootstrap CI：0.015–0.102），同时仍存在直接关联。通过感知行为控制产生的显著间接关联表明，农户对自身实施CSA能力的感知可能是连接制度支持与采用意愿的重要路径。研究结果凸显了将制度支持与增强农户实施CSA的感知能力、提升未来采用行为意愿的努力相结合的重要性。","Climate Resilience and Sustainability","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",67,{"impact":16,"substance":95,"depth":96,"authority":97,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":98},21,17,13,"基于扩展计划行为理论对埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业采纳意愿的实证研究，方法规范、数据扎实，但属区域性学术成果，对国内农业信息化实践的直接参考价值有限。",[100],{"name":91,"url":88},[27,28,29,102,103],"采纳意愿","行为机制",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":107},{"candidates":108,"agricultural_evidence":45},[109,113,117],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":110,"abstract":111,"tags":112},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":51,"score":52,"supported":45,"title":114,"abstract":115,"tags":116},[54],[54],[],{"code":63,"score":71,"supported":45,"title":118,"abstract":119,"tags":121},[],[120],"气候适应",[28],[68,123],"气候智慧型农业 埃塞俄比亚 行为机制 采纳意愿","埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业-5105","10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071",{"doi":125,"openalex_id":127,"authors":128,"venue":91,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":138,"card":139,"direction":145,"ingested_from":81},"W7222349215",[129,131,133,136],{"name":130,"orcid":78},"Tesfaye Gafaro",{"name":132,"orcid":8},"Kassa Tarekegn Erekalo",{"name":134,"orcid":135},"Fresenbet Zeleke","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9792-9240",{"name":137,"orcid":8},"Sime Shiferaw","https:\u002F\u002Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com\u002Fdoi\u002Fpdfdirect\u002F10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071",{"tldr":140,"method":141,"finding":142,"direction":143,"opportunity":144},"基于扩展计划行为理论，分析埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业采纳意愿的行为机制。","对384户小农户问卷调查，用协方差结构方程模型分析。","感知易用性影响最强，制度支持通过感知行为控制间接提升采纳意愿。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索数字服务与制度支持如何协同提升农户感知能力，促进气候智慧型农业采纳。","农业绿色发展与碳","2026-10-16T23:31:01.112802Z",{"id":148,"title":149,"url":150,"summary":151,"summary_zh":152,"content":8,"source_name":153,"source_url":150,"published_at":154,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":155,"score_detail":156,"sources":158,"tags":160,"primary_topic":164,"secondary_topics":169,"classification":176,"search_phrases":222,"slug":225,"view_count":79,"doi":226,"paper":227,"created_at":243},5478,"Characterisation of Food Security Situation for Smallholder Farmers in Zvimba","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30","This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the food security situation among smallholder farmers (SHFs) in Zvimba District, Zimbabwe. Smallholder agriculture is the bedrock of Zimbabwe's food system, yet it remains highly vulnerable to a complex array of shocks and stressors. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research investigates the prevalence, drivers and lived experiences of food insecurity within this community. A structured survey was administered to 412 randomly selected smallholder households across the district's wards. The quantitative data were supplemented by 12 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 24 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with farmers, community leaders and agricultural extension officers to capture qualitative nuances. The study is grounded in the Food Security Theory (FST), which conceptualises food security through its four pillars: food availability, food access, food utilisation and food stability. Findings reveal a precarious food security situation. Quantitatively, 78.4% of households were found to be food insecure, with an average Hunger Months Index of 4.7 months per year. The study identifies a significant disconnect between maize production, the national staple and household consumption, with over 65% of households failing to produce enough maize to meet their annual requirements. Qualitative data illuminated the multi-faceted drivers of this insecurity. Key points to note include climate change whereby erratic rainfall and prolonged mid-season dry spells were consistently reported as the primary production challenges, limited access to farming inputs whereby high costs and unreliable supplies of certified seeds, fertilizers and agro[1]chemicals constrain productivity. Morelso, socio-economic factors such as poverty, lack of viable alternative livelihoods and limited access to formal credit perpetuate a cycle of vulnerability. In addition, institutional weaknesses, for example, challenges with agricultural extension services and market inefficiencies, exacerbate the situation. The study concludes that food insecurity in Zvimba is not merely a problem of food production, but is deeply rooted in structural issues affecting food access, food utilisation, as well as food stability. Recommendations are proposed for a multi-sectoral approach, including promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) and drought-resistant crops, strengthening input support systems and rural finance, diversifying livelihood strategies and enhancing the capacity of extension services. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the localised dynamics of food security and provides evidence-based guidance for policymakers, development practitioners and the farmers of Zvimba themselves.","本研究对津巴布韦兹维姆巴区小农户（smallholder farmers, SHFs）的粮食安全状况进行了全面分析。小农农业是津巴布韦粮食体系的基石，但仍极易受到一系列复杂冲击和压力的影响。本研究采用混合方法，考察了该社区粮食不安全的普遍程度、驱动因素及生活体验。研究对该区各选区随机抽取的412户小农户进行了结构化问卷调查。定量数据辅以12次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）和24次关键知情人访谈（KIIs），访谈对象包括农民、社区领袖和农业推广人员，以捕捉定性层面的细微差异。本研究以粮食安全理论（Food Security Theory, FST）为基础，该理论通过四大支柱界定粮食安全：粮食可供性、粮食获取、粮食利用和粮食稳定性。研究结果揭示了严峻的粮食安全形势。定量数据显示，78.4%的家庭存在粮食不安全，年均饥饿月份指数为4.7个月。研究发现，玉米产量——该国主粮——与家庭消费之间存在显著脱节，超过65%的家庭生产的玉米不足以满足其年度需求。定性数据揭示了这一不安全状况的多重驱动因素。值得注意的要点包括：气候变化，即降雨不稳定和持续的中期干旱被一致报告为主要生产挑战；农业投入品获取受限，即认证种子、化肥和农用化学品成本高昂且供应不可靠，制约了生产力。此外，贫困、缺乏可行的替代生计以及正规信贷获取受限等社会经济因素使脆弱性循环持续存在。此外，制度薄弱环节，例如农业推广服务面临的挑战和市场效率低下，加剧了这一状况。研究得出结论，兹维姆巴的粮食不安全不仅仅是粮食生产问题，而是深深植根于影响粮食获取、粮食利用以及粮食稳定性的结构性问题。研究提出了采取多部门方法的建议，包括推广气候智能型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）和抗旱作物、加强投入品支持体系和农村金融、多样化生计策略以及增强","Ngenani The Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti Journal of Community Engagement and Societal Transformations","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",55,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":19,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":157},"基于412户调查与混合方法的扎实实证研究，但属津巴布韦地方性案例，公共影响与信源权威度有限，可作参考而非每日精选。",[159],{"name":153,"url":150},[26,27,161,162,163],"气候智慧农业","农业推广","津巴布韦",{"code":58,"slug":165,"name":166,"path":167,"parent_code":168},"yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security","A",[170,171],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"code":63,"slug":172,"name":173,"path":174,"parent_code":175},"climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":177},{"candidates":178,"agricultural_evidence":45},[179,184,188,196,203,210,217],{"code":58,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":180,"abstract":182,"tags":183},[181],"food security",[26,181],[26],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":185,"abstract":186,"tags":187},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":63,"score":12,"supported":45,"title":189,"abstract":190,"tags":195},[],[191,192,193,194],"气候变化","干旱","climate change","drought",[161],{"code":197,"score":198,"supported":45,"title":199,"abstract":200,"tags":202},"G1",7,[],[162,201],"agricultural extension",[162],{"code":204,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":205,"abstract":206,"tags":209},"A3",[],[207,208],"玉米","maize",[],{"code":211,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":212,"abstract":213,"tags":216},"G3",[],[214,215],"农村金融","rural finance",[],{"code":51,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":219,"abstract":220,"tags":221},3,[],[54],[],[223,224],"Zvimba 小农户 粮食安全","津巴布韦 小农 玉米","Zvimba小农户粮食安全-5478","10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30",{"doi":226,"openalex_id":228,"authors":229,"venue":153,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":8,"card":238,"direction":80,"ingested_from":81},"W7223029383",[230,233,236],{"name":231,"orcid":232},"Casper Myambo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-8625-7526",{"name":234,"orcid":235},"Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4123-0238",{"name":237,"orcid":8},"Patience Mutopo",{"tldr":239,"method":240,"finding":241,"direction":143,"opportunity":242},"调查津巴布韦Zvimba小农户粮食安全状况，分析其普遍性、成因与实际体验。","混合方法：412户问卷、12场焦点小组、24个关键人物访谈，基于粮食安全四支柱理","78.4%家庭粮食不安全，年均饥饿月4.7个月，主因是气候、投入、社会经济与制度等结构性问题。","可探索用移动端问卷与遥感产量监测构建小农户粮食安全动态预警与精准干预系统。","2026-10-21T23:30:08.937079Z",{"id":245,"title":246,"url":247,"summary":248,"summary_zh":249,"content":8,"source_name":250,"source_url":247,"published_at":251,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":252,"score_detail":253,"sources":257,"tags":259,"primary_topic":262,"secondary_topics":263,"classification":266,"search_phrases":334,"slug":337,"view_count":79,"doi":338,"paper":339,"created_at":351},5185,"When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182","When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya For generations, farmers in Western Kenya have watched the skies carefully. The arrival, duration, and distribution of rainfall have traditionally provided important signals about when to prepare land, plant, weed, and harvest. But these signals are becoming increasingly difficult to read. Climate change is altering rainfall patterns, while increasingly frequent extreme weather events are making farming more uncertain. The current outlook for the October–December 2026 season brings this challenge sharply into focus. The IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC) forecasts a wetter-than-normal season across much of the Greater Horn of Africa. The Lake Victoria Basin, which includes large parts of Western Kenya, is among the areas with a high likelihood of receiving more than 400 mm of seasonal rainfall. ICPAC reports that El Niño has developed and is expected to strengthen, while a positive Indian Ocean Dipole is also expected—climate conditions that are commonly associated with enhanced rainfall in the region, and is likely to run into February of 2027. But what does this mean for the smallholder farmer? The first point is that more rainfall does not necessarily mean more food. For a farmer whose livelihood depends almost entirely on rain-fed agriculture, abundant rainfall can be a blessing. It can replenish streams and water sources, improve soil moisture, restore pasture and create favourable conditions for crop production. If well distributed, the rains could contribute to improved harvests and household food supplies. The problem arises when rainfall is too intense, too concentrated or poorly distributed. A farmer may receive a great deal of rain in a few days and then experience a dry spell. Another farmer a few kilometres away may receive considerably less. Heavy downpours can cause flooding, waterlogging and soil erosion. Seeds may be washed away soon after planting. Young crops can be submerged or damaged. Valuable topsoil and nutrients can be carried away, reducing the productivity of land in subsequent seasons. This is particularly important in Western Kenya, where many households depend on small parcels of land for both food and income. A failed or damaged crop is not simply an agricultural loss. It can mean less food in the household, less money for school fees and health care, and fewer resources to purchase nutritious foods. The food-security paradox We must, therefore, look beyond agricultural production to food and nutrition security. A household may produce enough maize yet still have a poor diet if vegetables, legumes, fruits, milk, eggs or other foods are unavailable or unaffordable. Climate shocks can reduce this diversity. When crops are damaged, families may depend more heavily on whatever staple food remains available. This is why climate resilience must also be nutrition-sensitive. Western Kenya has a rich agricultural tradition and considerable potential for diversified food production. Farmers grow cereals, legumes, vegetables and root crops and keep livestock and poultry. Such diversity is not merely an agricultural advantage; it is a nutritional resource. It can provide different foods, spread risk and generate income at different times of the year. Climate adaptation should, therefore, not encourage farmers simply to produce more of one crop. It should help them build diverse and resilient farming systems. Women carry a large part of the burden The impact of erratic and excessive rainfall also has a gender dimension. Women in smallholder households are often deeply involved in food production, processing, preparation and household nutrition. When harvests fail, or food prices rise, women frequently have to find ways of stretching limited household resources to feed the family. When roads become impassable or markets are disrupted, women may have greater difficulty accessing food and agricultural inputs. When water sources are contaminated or damaged, household responsibilities can become even more demanding. Climate adaptation must therefore deliberately include women—not simply as beneficiaries, but as decision-makers, innovators, farmers and leaders. Young people must also be part of the solution There is another group that deserves greater attention: young people. Western Kenya cannot build climate-resilient agriculture while treating agriculture as an occupation of the past. Young people need to see opportunities in modern farming, agro-processing, food safety, climate information services, irrigation, digital agriculture and agricultural entrepreneurship. The increasing unpredictability of climate may actually provide an opportunity to make agriculture more innovative. Young people can help introduce new technologies, improve access to climate information, develop value-added products and create businesses around food production and processing. From forecasting to action The availability of a climate forecast is useful only if it reaches the people who need it in time. Farmers need information that answers practical questions: When should I plant? Which crops or varieties are appropriate? How can I protect my soil? What should I do if rainfall becomes excessive? How can I protect harvested food? Where can I obtain reliable seed and other inputs? Seasonal forecasts should, therefore, be translated into local, practical agricultural advice. ICPAC itself emphasizes that seasonal forecasts should be used together with weekly and monthly forecasts and national meteorological information. This requires stronger links between meteorological services, agricultural extension officers, researchers, county governments, farmer organizations and communities. We should also strengthen simple but important measures: water harvesting, drainage, terracing and soil conservation; planting crops and varieties suited to local conditions; maintaining vegetation cover; diversifying crops and livestock; improving storage facilities; and protecting food from moisture and contamination. Prepare before the rain comes The greatest lesson from the current El Niño outlook is perhaps that preparedness must begin before the first heavy rains arrive. Governments and development partners should not wait for floods, damaged roads, destroyed crops or food shortages before responding. Early warning should lead to early action. Farmers should be supported to prepare their farms, protect livestock, secure seed and inputs, strengthen food storage and identify alternative routes to markets. This is particularly important because the same season can produce both opportunities and losses. ICPAC notes that enhanced rainfall can support agricultural production and replenish water resources, but can simultaneously increase the risk of flooding, flash floods and landslides in vulnerable areas. A changing climate requires a different agricultural mindset Perhaps the most important change we need is in the way we think about farming. For too long, agricultural planning has often assumed that rainfall will behave according to a familiar calendar. That assumption is becoming increasingly unsafe. Farmers now have to manage not only too little rain, but also too much rain, rain at the wrong time and rain in the wrong place. The challenge is, therefore, not simply to produce more food. It is to build food systems that can continue providing adequate, diverse, safe and nutritious food under increasingly uncertain climatic conditions. Western Kenya's smallholder farmers should not be left alone to carry this burden. They need science that responds to their realities, extension services that reach them, climate information they can understand and use, financial services that help them manage risk, markets that function during difficult seasons, and policies that recognize the central role of smallholder agriculture in national food and nutrition security, and partners who are willing to appreciate and make use of indigenous knowledge. El Niño should, therefore, be viewed neither simply as a disaster nor automatically as a blessing. It is a climate event whose consequences will depend greatly on our preparedness. The question before us is not merely, “Will the rains come?” They probably will. The more important question is: Will our farmers, food systems and institutions be ready when they do? That is where climate resilience—and ultimately food and nutrition security—will be tested. Prof. Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o Founder and Editor-in-Chief, AJFAND ORCiD: https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","当雨水过多时：厄尔尼诺现象、小农户与肯尼亚西部的粮食安全\n\n世代以来，肯尼亚西部的农民一直密切关注着天空。降雨的到来、持续时间和分布，传统上为何时整地、播种、除草和收获提供了重要信号。但这些信号正变得越来越难以解读。气候变化正在改变降雨模式，而日益频繁的极端天气事件使农业变得更加不确定。当前对2026年10月至12月季节的展望使这一挑战凸显出来。政府间发展组织气候预测与应用中心（ICPAC）预测，大非洲之角大部分地区将迎来高于正常水平的湿润季节。维多利亚湖流域——包括肯尼亚西部的大部分地区——属于极有可能获得超过400毫米季节性降雨的区域之一。ICPAC报告称，厄尔尼诺现象已经形成并预计将增强，同时预计还将出现正印度洋偶极子——这些气候条件通常与该地区降雨增强相关，并可能持续到2027年2月。但这对小农户意味着什么？首先，更多降雨并不必然意味着更多粮食。对于生计几乎完全依赖雨养农业的农民来说，充沛的降雨可能是福。它可以补充溪流和水源、改善土壤湿度、恢复牧场，并为作物生产创造有利条件。如果分布良好，降雨可能有助于改善收成和家庭粮食供应。问题出现在降雨过于猛烈、过于集中或分布不均的时候。一个农民可能在几天内获得大量降雨，随后又经历一段干旱期。几公里外的另一个农民可能获得的降雨少得多。暴雨可能引发洪水、渍涝和土壤侵蚀。种子可能在播种后不久被冲走。幼苗可能被淹没或受损。宝贵的表土和养分可能被带走，降低土地在后续季节的生产力。这在肯尼亚西部尤为重要，因为许多家庭依赖小块土地获取食物和收入。作物歉收或受损不仅仅是农业损失。它可能意味着家庭食物减少、用于学费和医疗的钱减少，以及购买营养食品的资源减少。粮食安全……","African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":17,"substance":254,"depth":255,"authority":97,"freshness":16,"relevant":21,"comment":256},20,16,"核心期刊评论文章，结合El Niño预测讨论小农户气候适应与粮食营养安全，有实质分析与行动建议，但属区域案例、非信息化技术突破。",[258],{"name":250,"url":247},[260,26,27,161,261],"肯尼亚","气候预警",{"code":58,"slug":165,"name":166,"path":167,"parent_code":168},[264,265],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"code":63,"slug":172,"name":173,"path":174,"parent_code":175},{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":267},{"candidates":268,"agricultural_evidence":45},[269,273,277,283,290,294,300,306,312,318,324,328],{"code":58,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":270,"abstract":271,"tags":272},[181],[26,181],[26],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":274,"abstract":275,"tags":276},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":63,"score":12,"supported":45,"title":278,"abstract":279,"tags":282},[],[191,192,193,280,281],"climate resilience","waterlogging",[161],{"code":284,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":285,"abstract":286,"tags":289},"H2",[],[287,288],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":204,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":291,"abstract":292,"tags":293},[],[208],[],{"code":295,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":296,"abstract":297,"tags":299},"B4",[],[298],"月季",[],{"code":301,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":302,"abstract":303,"tags":305},"C",[],[304],"livestock",[],{"code":307,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":308,"abstract":309,"tags":311},"C3",[],[310],"poultry",[],{"code":313,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":314,"abstract":315,"tags":317},"E4",[],[316],"food safety",[],{"code":319,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":320,"abstract":321,"tags":323},"F4",[],[322],"除草",[],{"code":197,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":325,"abstract":326,"tags":327},[],[201],[],{"code":329,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":330,"abstract":331,"tags":333},"H3",[],[332],"irrigation",[],[335,336],"El Niño 小农户 粮食安全","ICPAC 季节预报 肯尼亚","ElNiño小农户粮食安全-5185","10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182",{"doi":338,"openalex_id":340,"authors":341,"venue":250,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":345,"card":346,"direction":143,"ingested_from":81},"W7222630373",[342],{"name":343,"orcid":344},"Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","https:\u002F\u002Fajfand.net\u002FVolume26\u002FNo8\u002FEditorialVol26No8.pdf",{"tldr":347,"method":348,"finding":349,"direction":145,"opportunity":350},"分析厄尔尼诺导致肯尼亚西部降雨过量对小农粮食安全的影响","基于ICPAC季节气候预测与厄尔尼诺、印度洋偶极子分析","降雨过多且分布不均会引发洪涝、土壤侵蚀，反而威胁小农粮食安全","可结合遥感与农户调查，量化极端降雨时空分布对小农产量与粮食安全的非线性影响","2026-10-17T23:30:36.130973Z",{"id":353,"title":354,"url":355,"summary":356,"summary_zh":357,"content":8,"source_name":358,"source_url":355,"published_at":92,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":359,"score_detail":360,"sources":362,"tags":364,"primary_topic":366,"secondary_topics":367,"classification":369,"search_phrases":393,"slug":396,"view_count":21,"doi":397,"paper":398,"created_at":416},4983,"Climate Change and Livelihood Vulnerability among Smallholder Farming Households in the Diffa Region of Niger’s Lake Chad Basin","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Fjeai\u002F2026\u002Fv48i104567","Climate change affects agricultural production, on which 80% of rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa depend for their livelihoods. In the Lake Chad Basin, recent fluctuations in hydro-climatic conditions have compromised crop yields and food security, severely affecting smallholder farmers’ well-being. Enhancing their adaptive capacity and resilience is therefore essential for sustainable development. This study assesses smallholder farmers’ vulnerability to climate change-induced extreme weather events in rural areas of the Lake Chad Basin using the Livelihood Vulnerability Index (LVI). Data were collected through questionnaire surveys of 200 farming households across four villages in the Diffa region of Niger. The LVI was calculated using nine components: sociodemographic profile, education and housing, livelihood strategy, social networks, food, water resources, health, land resources, and disasters and climate variability. Results showed that farmers in Kangarwa were the most vulnerable (LVI = 0.58), while those in Boulangou were the least vulnerable (0.51). Digargo and Mamari had similar vulnerability levels (0.55 and 0.56, respectively). Overall, farmers in all four villages were moderately vulnerable. Kangarwa’s higher vulnerability was mainly associated with social networks (0.81), livelihood strategy (0.75), and land resources (0.75). In Boulangou, low vulnerability was linked to water resources (0.12) and sociodemographic conditions (0.35), although land (0.69), livelihood strategy (0.67), and food (0.65) increased vulnerability. These findings can inform interventions to strengthen smallholder farmers’ resilience. Diversifying livelihoods and adopting climate-smart agriculture technologies could enhance adaptive capacity and reduce vulnerability in highly affected areas.","气候变化影响着农业生产，而撒哈拉以南非洲80%的农村社区依赖农业维持生计。在乍得湖流域，近期水文气候条件的波动已危及作物产量和粮食安全，严重影响小农户的福祉。因此，增强其适应能力和韧性对可持续发展至关重要。本研究采用生计脆弱性指数（LVI）评估乍得湖流域农村地区小农户对气候变化引发的极端天气事件的脆弱性。数据通过对尼日尔迪法地区四个村庄200个农户的问卷调查收集。LVI基于九个组成部分计算：社会人口特征、教育与住房、生计策略、社会网络、粮食、水资源、健康、土地资源以及灾害与气候变异性。结果表明，Kangarwa的农户最为脆弱（LVI = 0.58），而Boulangou的农户脆弱性最低（0.51）。Digargo和Mamari的脆弱性水平相近（分别为0.55和0.56）。总体而言，四个村庄的农户均处于中等脆弱水平。Kangarwa较高的脆弱性主要与社会网络（0.81）、生计策略（0.75）和土地资源（0.75）相关。在Boulangou，低脆弱性与水资源（0.12）和社会人口条件（0.35）相关，尽管土地（0.69）、生计策略（0.67）和粮食（0.65）增加了脆弱性。这些发现可为增强小农户韧性的干预措施提供依据。生计多样化和采用气候智能型农业技术可增强高受影响地区的适应能力并降低脆弱性。","Journal of Experimental Agriculture International",65,{"impact":16,"substance":254,"depth":255,"authority":44,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":361},"基于200户问卷的LVI实证研究，数据与结论具体，但属区域性学术成果，公共影响有限。",[363],{"name":358,"url":355},[26,27,191,120,365],"生计脆弱性",{"code":63,"slug":172,"name":173,"path":174,"parent_code":175},[368],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":370},{"candidates":371,"agricultural_evidence":45},[372,376,380,384,389],{"code":63,"score":255,"supported":45,"title":373,"abstract":374,"tags":375},[193],[191,193],[191,120],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":379},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":58,"score":198,"supported":45,"title":381,"abstract":382,"tags":383},[],[26,181],[26],{"code":329,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":385,"abstract":386,"tags":388},[],[387],"水资源",[],{"code":51,"score":218,"supported":45,"title":390,"abstract":391,"tags":392},[],[54],[],[394,395],"尼日尔 乍得湖流域 小农户","生计脆弱性指数 LVI","尼日尔乍得湖流域小农户-4983","10.9734\u002Fjeai\u002F2026\u002Fv48i104567",{"doi":397,"openalex_id":399,"authors":400,"venue":358,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":355,"card":411,"direction":80,"ingested_from":81},"W7221748179",[401,403,405,407,409],{"name":402,"orcid":8},"Issiaka Issaharou Matchi",{"name":404,"orcid":8},"I. Oumarou Abdou",{"name":406,"orcid":8},"H. Rabiou",{"name":408,"orcid":8},"A. Mahamane",{"name":410,"orcid":8},"M. Saadou",{"tldr":412,"method":413,"finding":414,"direction":145,"opportunity":415},"用生计脆弱性指数评估尼日尔迪法地区四个村庄小农户的气候变化脆弱性。","问卷调查200户农户，计算含9个成分的生计脆弱性指数（LVI）。","四村农户均呈中度脆弱，Kangarwa最脆弱（0.58），Boulangou最低（0.51）。","可结合气候智能农业技术与生计多样化，在脆弱性高发区开展干预效果评估研究。","2026-10-15T23:30:08.248266Z",{"id":418,"title":419,"url":420,"summary":421,"summary_zh":422,"content":8,"source_name":423,"source_url":420,"published_at":424,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":425,"score_detail":426,"sources":428,"tags":430,"primary_topic":434,"secondary_topics":435,"classification":436,"search_phrases":451,"slug":454,"view_count":21,"doi":455,"paper":456,"created_at":483},4807,"Climate Smart Agriculture Adaptation Resource Inequalities Among Smallholder Farmers in the Barind Tract of Bangladesh: The Role of Governance Inclusion and Institutional Access","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.47191\u002Fijsshr\u002Fv9-i10-18","Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly discussed as an approach for responding to climate risks while supporting agricultural productivity, resilience and sustainable resource use. However, access to the institutional and governance resources that enable farmers to adopt CSA may be uneven. This manuscript develops an empirical framework for examining adaptation-resource inequalities among smallholder farmers in the drought-prone Barind Tract of Bangladesh, with particular attention to governance inclusion and institutional access. The study is aligned with an approved doctoral research design focused on CSA adoption and its contribution to livelihood resilience in Rajshahi, Naogaon and Chapainawabganj. A mixed-methods design will combine a structured household survey, GPS-based spatial information, key-informant interviews, focused ethnographic fieldwork, policy and institutional document review, and relevant secondary data. The quantitative component will construct a Climate-Smart Agriculture Adoption Index (CSAAI) and examine socioeconomic, livelihood-capital, institutional, environmental and behavioural determinants using a Fractional Logit model. The institutional component will examine stakeholder roles, financing, extension, policy implementation and barriers through stakeholder mapping, a Power–Interest Matrix, a Barrier Severity Index and thematic analysis. Governance inclusion and institutional access will therefore be treated as mechanisms and explanatory conditions within the broader CSA adoption framework rather than as unsupported outcome measures. The manuscript does not report empirical results because the household survey and fieldwork are scheduled for the subsequent fieldwork phase of the doctoral project. This design provides a transparent basis for assessing whether differences in institutional access and governance inclusion are associated with unequal opportunities to adopt CSA and, subsequently, with livelihood resilience.","气候智慧型农业(CSA)日益被视为一种应对气候风险、同时支撑农业生产力、韧性与可持续资源利用的路径。然而，农民获取使其能够采用CSA的制度与治理资源的机会可能并不均衡。本文构建了一个实证框架，用于考察孟加拉国易受干旱影响的巴林德地区小农户之间的适应资源不平等，尤其关注治理包容性与制度可及性。本研究与一项已获批准的博士研究设计相一致，该设计聚焦于拉杰沙希、瑙冈和查帕伊纳瓦布甘杰地区CSA的采用及其对生计韧性的贡献。研究采用混合方法设计，将结构化农户调查、基于GPS的空间信息、关键信息人访谈、聚焦民族志田野工作、政策与制度文件审查以及相关二手数据相结合。定量部分将构建气候智慧型农业采用指数(CSAAI)，并使用分数对数模型考察社会经济、生计资本、制度、环境与行为等方面的决定因素。制度部分将通过利益相关者映射、权力—利益矩阵、障碍严重程度指数和主题分析，考察利益相关者角色、融资、推广、政策实施及障碍。因此，治理包容性与制度可及性将被视为更广泛的CSA采用框架中的机制与解释性条件，而非缺乏支撑的结果测量指标。本文不报告实证结果，因为农户调查与田野工作安排在博士项目后续的田野阶段进行。该设计为评估制度可及性与治理包容性方面的差异是否与采用CSA的不平等机会相关、并进而与生计韧性相关，提供了透明的依据。","International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",51,{"impact":16,"substance":12,"depth":44,"authority":44,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":427},"研究设计类论文，尚无实证结果，方法框架有一定参考价值但信息增量有限，暂不建议进入每日精选。",[429],{"name":423,"url":420},[27,28,431,432,433],"农业治理","孟加拉","机构可及性",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":437},{"candidates":438,"agricultural_evidence":45},[439,443,447],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":440,"abstract":441,"tags":442},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":51,"score":52,"supported":45,"title":444,"abstract":445,"tags":446},[54],[54],[],{"code":63,"score":198,"supported":45,"title":448,"abstract":449,"tags":450},[],[192,194],[28],[452,453],"Barind Tract 小农户 气候智慧型农业","孟加拉 农业治理 机构可及性","BarindTract小农户气候智慧型农业-4807","10.47191\u002Fijsshr\u002Fv9-i10-18",{"doi":455,"openalex_id":457,"authors":458,"venue":423,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":477,"card":478,"direction":80,"ingested_from":81},"W7221555223",[459,461,463,466,469,471,473,475],{"name":460,"orcid":8},"Md Shahabuddin",{"name":462,"orcid":8},"Most Jesmin Ara",{"name":464,"orcid":465},"Banani Biswas","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5773-1574",{"name":467,"orcid":468},"Rui Miguel Moutinho Sá","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6407-4541",{"name":470,"orcid":8},"Faizah Sadik Tapti",{"name":472,"orcid":8},"Kazi Afnan Maha",{"name":474,"orcid":8},"Sumia Akter Mim",{"name":476,"orcid":8},"Tanisha Tabassum Khan","https:\u002F\u002Fijsshr.in\u002Fv9i10\u002FDoc\u002F18.pdf",{"tldr":479,"method":480,"finding":481,"direction":143,"opportunity":482},"构建混合方法框架，研究孟加拉Barind Tract小农气候智慧农业采纳中的制度与治理资源不平等。","混合方法设计，含家庭调查、GPS空间数据、访谈、政策审查及分数Logit模型。","论文为研究设计，尚未报告实证结果，将治理包容与制度获取作为解释机制。","可延伸至数字治理工具如何提升小农制度获取公平性及气候适应韧性。","2026-10-13T23:30:10.181875Z",{"id":485,"title":486,"url":487,"summary":488,"summary_zh":489,"content":8,"source_name":490,"source_url":487,"published_at":491,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":359,"score_detail":492,"sources":494,"tags":496,"primary_topic":499,"secondary_topics":501,"classification":503,"search_phrases":529,"slug":532,"view_count":218,"doi":533,"paper":534,"created_at":552},3989,"Different seeds, same pest? Exploring smallholder farmers’ lived experiences of fall armyworm impacts on hybrid and local maize in Kenya","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1925312","Fall Armyworm (FAW) is a persistent threat to maize-based food systems in sub-Saharan Africa, but less is known about how farmers experience its effects across seed types and household livelihoods. This exploratory qualitative study examined smallholder farmers’ lived experiences of FAW damage in hybrid and local maize in Siaya County, Kenya. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews lasting 30–45 min were conducted with 88 purposively selected farmers, and responses were analyzed thematically by two independent researchers. Farmers described FAW as recurrent and difficult to control; 43.2% reported infestation every season. Most participants (77.3%) perceived hybrid maize as more severely affected than local maize, whereas 9.1% perceived local maize as more affected and 9.1% reported similar effects. Participants associated infestation with reduced yields, impaired crop growth, lower-quality harvests, lost income, pesticide and labour costs, depleted maize stocks, food purchases, and stress related to financial and food uncertainty. Reported responses included pesticide use, repeated spraying, purchasing food, crop diversification, and reconsidering maize varieties. Because the study relied on farmers’ accounts rather than controlled varietal comparisons, the perceived differences cannot be attributed to seed characteristics independently of management and growing conditions. The findings indicate that farmers evaluate FAW damage through interconnected production, livelihood, food-security, and seed-choice concerns, supporting locally tested pest-management and seed advisory services.","草地贪夜蛾（Fall Armyworm, FAW）是撒哈拉以南非洲以玉米为基础的粮食系统面临的持续威胁，但人们对农民在不同种子类型和家庭生计条件下如何经历其影响知之甚少。本探索性定性研究考察了肯尼亚西亚亚县小农户在杂交玉米和本地玉米中遭受草地贪夜蛾危害的生活体验。研究对88名有意选取的农民进行了为期30至45分钟的面对面半结构化访谈，并由两名独立研究人员对回答进行主题分析。农民将草地贪夜蛾描述为反复发生且难以控制；43.2%报告每季均发生虫害。大多数参与者（77.3%）认为杂交玉米比本地玉米受害更严重，而9.1%认为本地玉米受害更严重，9.1%报告两者影响相似。参与者将虫害与产量下降、作物生长受损、收成品质量降低、收入损失、农药和劳动力成本、玉米库存耗尽、粮食购买以及与经济和粮食不确定性相关的压力联系起来。报告的应对措施包括使用农药、反复喷药、购买粮食、作物多样化以及重新考虑玉米品种。由于本研究依赖农民叙述而非受控品种比较，所感知的差异不能独立于管理和生长条件而归因于种子特征。研究结果表明，农民通过生产、生计、粮食安全和种子选择等相互关联的关注来评估草地贪夜蛾危害，这支持开展本地化测试的害虫管理和种子咨询服务。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-02T00:00:00Z",{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":255,"authority":97,"freshness":12,"relevant":21,"comment":493},"基于88户肯尼亚小农户访谈的质性研究，揭示草地贪夜蛾对杂交与本地玉米影响的农户感知差异，对非洲玉米病虫害防控与种子推广有参考价值，但属区域案例、公共影响有限。",[495],{"name":490,"url":487},[497,26,207,27,498],"种业振兴","病虫害防治",{"code":204,"slug":208,"name":207,"path":500,"parent_code":168},"\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fmaize",[502],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":504},{"candidates":505,"agricultural_evidence":45},[506,510,514,520,524],{"code":204,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":507,"abstract":508,"tags":509},[208],[207,208],[207],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":511,"abstract":512,"tags":513},[47],[27,47],[27],{"code":319,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":515,"abstract":516,"tags":519},[],[517,518],"农药","pesticide",[],{"code":58,"score":71,"supported":45,"title":521,"abstract":522,"tags":523},[],[26],[26],{"code":525,"score":21,"supported":13,"title":526,"abstract":527,"tags":528},"F1",[],[],[497],[530,531],"肯尼亚 草地贪夜蛾 玉米","杂交玉米 本地玉米 虫害","肯尼亚草地贪夜蛾玉米-3989","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1925312",{"doi":533,"openalex_id":535,"authors":536,"venue":490,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":487,"card":547,"direction":143,"ingested_from":81},"W7215042180",[537,540,542,544],{"name":538,"orcid":539},"George Ariya","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-2286-9455",{"name":541,"orcid":8},"Beatrice Cheserek",{"name":543,"orcid":8},"Violet Kadenyeka Mugalavai",{"name":545,"orcid":546},"Lizzy A. Mwamburi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8435-8194",{"tldr":548,"method":549,"finding":550,"direction":143,"opportunity":551},"通过访谈肯尼亚88位小农户，探究其对杂交与本地玉米受草地贪夜蛾影响的真实体验。","对88位农户进行半结构化访谈，采用主题分析法。","77.3%农户认为杂交玉米受害更重，虫害带来减产、收入损失与粮食不安全。","可结合农户感知数据与遥感虫害监测，构建面向小农户的本地化预警与品种推荐决策模型。","2026-10-02T23:30:09.411010Z"]