[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3996":3,"related-3996":90},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":32,"secondary_topics":38,"classification":39,"search_phrases":58,"slug":61,"view_count":62,"doi":63,"paper":64,"created_at":89},3996,"Growth, instability and adoption trends of natural farming in apple cultivation in Himachal Pradesh, India","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1950685","This study analyses the trends in area under conventional and Subhash Palekar Natural Farming (SPNF) in apple cultivation in Himachal Pradesh from 2011 to 2024. It uses secondary data from the Directorate of Horticulture and the State Project Implementation Unit (SPIU), focusing on 24,595 registered SPNF apple growers. The analysis employs Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), Coefficient of Variation (CV) and the Cuddy-Della Valle Instability Index (CDVI) to compare the periods before (2011–2017) and after (2018–2024) the adoption of SPNF practices. The area under conventional farming grew from 103,644 hectares in 2011 to 116,338 hectares in 2024, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 0.89 per cent. However, the expansion rate decreased from 1.40 per cent in 2011–2017 to 0.46 per cent in 2018–2024. In contrast, the area registered under SPNF increased rapidly during the initial adoption phase, from 224.35 ha in 2018 to 14,223.85 ha in 2022, before declining to 4,354.04 ha in 2024. The Welch’s t -test revealed a significant difference in mean conventional apple area between the pre- and post-SPNF periods ( t = −4.734, df = 7.54, p = 0.002). However, this temporal difference does not establish a causal effect of SPNF on apple cultivation area. The observed fluctuations in registered natural-farming area highlight the dynamic nature of adoption and the need for continued institutional support, extension services and market linkages.","本研究分析了2011年至2024年喜马偕尔邦苹果种植中常规农业与苏巴什·帕莱卡自然农法（Subhash Palekar Natural Farming, SPNF）种植面积的趋势。研究使用来自园艺局和国家项目实施单位（SPIU）的二手数据，重点关注24,595名已注册的SPNF苹果种植者。分析采用复合年增长率（CAGR）、变异系数（CV）和Cuddy-Della Valle不稳定指数（CDVI），对采用SPNF实践之前（2011—2017年）和之后（2018—2024年）两个时期进行比较。常规农业种植面积从2011年的103,644公顷增长到2024年的116,338公顷，复合年增长率（CAGR）为0.89%。然而，扩张速度从2011—2017年的1.40%下降到2018—2024年的0.46%。相比之下，SPNF注册面积在初始采用阶段迅速增加，从2018年的224.35公顷增至2022年的14,223.85公顷，随后在2024年下降到4,354.04公顷。Welch t检验显示，SPNF实施前后常规苹果种植面积均值存在显著差异（t = −4.734，df = 7.54，p = 0.002）。然而，这一时间差异并不能确立SPNF对苹果种植面积的因果效应。注册自然农法面积的观察到的波动凸显了采用过程的动态性，以及持续的制度支持、推广服务和市场联结的必要性。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,73,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},12,22,17,13,9,1,"基于2011—2024年官方数据的自然农业采纳趋势实证研究，方法规范、数据翔实，但属印度区域案例，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"农户采纳","自然农业","苹果种植","喜马偕尔邦","种植面积",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},"B2","fruit","果树","\u002Ftopic\u002Fhorticulture\u002Ffruit","B",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":47},[45,53],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":48,"abstract":50,"tags":52},14,true,[49],"apple",[51,49],"苹果",[],{"code":54,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":55,"abstract":56,"tags":57},"G2",[],[],[27],[59,60],"喜马偕尔邦 苹果 自然农业","SPNF 苹果 种植面积","喜马偕尔邦苹果自然农业-3996",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1950685",{"doi":63,"openalex_id":65,"authors":66,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":6,"card":82,"direction":86,"ingested_from":88},"W7215070267",[67,70,72,74,76,79],{"name":68,"orcid":69},"Dinesh Kumar","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5762-551X",{"name":71,"orcid":9},"Kapil Kathuria",{"name":73,"orcid":9},"Tarjan Singh Thakur",{"name":75,"orcid":9},"Piyush Mehta",{"name":77,"orcid":78},"Rahul Dhiman","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0521-3342",{"name":80,"orcid":9},"Akanksha Klate",0,{"tldr":83,"method":84,"finding":85,"direction":86,"opportunity":87},"分析印度喜马偕尔邦苹果常规与自然 farming 的面积趋势、不稳定性及采用动态。","用CAGR、CV、CDVI及Welch t检验分析2011-2024年官方二级数","SPNF面积先激增后骤降，常规面积增速放缓，采用波动大需持续支持。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究自然 farming 采用后回落的社会经济驱动因素及市场联结对持续性的影响。","openalex","2026-10-02T23:30:09.880266Z",{"total":91,"page":22,"page_size":91,"items":92},6,[93,163,231,302,374,415],{"id":94,"title":95,"url":96,"summary":97,"summary_zh":98,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":96,"published_at":99,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":100,"sources":104,"tags":106,"primary_topic":111,"secondary_topics":112,"classification":113,"search_phrases":132,"slug":135,"view_count":81,"doi":136,"paper":137,"created_at":162},5468,"Farm-level technical efficiency in temperate horticulture: evidence from apple, pear, and cherry growers","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1928386","Improving resource-use efficiency is fundamental to enhancing agricultural productivity and promoting sustainable horticultural development, particularly in regions where opportunities for expanding cultivated land and increasing input use are limited. This study evaluates the technical efficiency of apple, pear, and cherry growers in the Kashmir Valley and examines the socioeconomic, institutional, and regional factors associated with farm-level technical efficiency. Primary data were collected from 418 horticultural households during 2023 using a multi-stage sampling approach. Technical efficiency was first estimated separately for apple, pear, and cherry growers using an input-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) framework under both Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) and Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) assumptions. Scale efficiency was subsequently estimated, while a pooled DEA model was employed to generate farm-level technical efficiency scores for the second-stage analysis. The determinants of technical efficiency were examined using Tobit regression, supported by a fractional logit model as a robustness check, and regional disparities were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney non-parametric tests. The results indicate that apple growers achieved the highest overall technical efficiency, followed by pear and cherry growers. The VRS estimates reveal substantially higher levels of pure technical efficiency, whereas the scale efficiency analysis suggests that a considerable proportion of technical inefficiency arises from farms operating below their optimal production scale. The second-stage analysis identifies family size, education, irrigation facilities, access to credit, and cold storage infrastructure as significant positive factors associated with farm-level technical efficiency, while significant regional disparities are observed across the Kashmir Valley. The robustness analysis confirms the consistency of the estimated relationships. These findings highlight that improving horticultural performance requires not only efficient farm-level resource management but also stronger institutional support, investments in irrigation and post-harvest infrastructure, improved access to rural credit, and region-specific development strategies. The study contributes to the literature by integrating crop-specific and pooled efficiency analyses with socioeconomic and regional assessments, providing policy-relevant evidence for promoting resource-efficient and sustainable horticultural production.","提高资源利用效率是提升农业生产力、促进园艺产业可持续发展的基础，在耕地扩张和投入增加机会有限的地区尤为如此。本研究评估了克什米尔谷地苹果、梨和樱桃种植者的技术效率，并考察了与农场层面技术效率相关的社会经济、制度和区域因素。研究采用多阶段抽样方法，于2023年从418个园艺农户收集了一手数据。首先，在规模报酬不变（CRS）和规模报酬可变（VRS）两种假设下，运用投入导向的数据包络分析（DEA）框架分别估算苹果、梨和樱桃种植者的技术效率。随后估算规模效率，并采用混合DEA模型生成农场层面技术效率得分用于第二阶段分析。技术效率的决定因素通过Tobit回归进行检验，并以分数logit模型作为稳健性检验加以支持，区域差异则采用Kruskal–Wallis和Mann–Whitney非参数检验进行评估。结果表明，苹果种植者总体技术效率最高，梨和樱桃种植者次之。VRS估计显示纯技术效率水平显著更高，而规模效率分析表明，相当比例的技术无效率源于农场经营规模低于最优生产规模。第二阶段分析识别出家庭规模、教育、灌溉设施、信贷获取和冷库基础设施是与农场层面技术效率显著正相关的因素，同时在克什米尔谷地观察到显著的区域差异。稳健性分析证实了所估计关系的一致性。这些发现表明，提升园艺产业绩效不仅需要有效的农场层面资源管理，还需要更强的制度支持、对灌溉和采后基础设施的投资、改善农村信贷获取以及因地制宜的发展策略。本研究通过将作物特定效率分析与混合效率分析同社会经济和区域评估相结合，为促进资源利用效率提升提供了具有政策相关性的证据。","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",{"impact":17,"substance":101,"depth":102,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":103},21,18,"基于418户果农一手数据，用DEA与Tobit回归分析技术效率，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，但属区域性研究，影响范围有限。",[105],{"name":10,"url":96},[107,108,29,109,110],"可持续农业","园艺产业","技术效率","数据包络分析",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":114},{"candidates":115,"agricultural_evidence":47},[116,120,127],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":117,"abstract":118,"tags":119},[49],[51,49],[],{"code":121,"score":91,"supported":47,"title":122,"abstract":123,"tags":126},"H3",[],[124,125],"灌溉","irrigation",[],{"code":128,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":129,"abstract":130,"tags":131},"H8",[],[],[107],[133,134],"数据包络分析 可持续农业 园艺产业 技术效率","数据包络分析 可持续农业","数据包络分析可持续农业园艺产业技术效率-5468","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1928386",{"doi":136,"openalex_id":138,"authors":139,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":96,"card":156,"direction":160,"ingested_from":88},"W7223025732",[140,142,145,148,151,154],{"name":141,"orcid":9},"Seerat Sajjad",{"name":143,"orcid":144},"Khursheed Hussain Dar","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3925-0758",{"name":146,"orcid":147},"Anam Ul Haq Ganie","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4404-5011",{"name":149,"orcid":150},"Ghadda Mohamed Awad Yousif","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4183-2957",{"name":152,"orcid":153},"Mohd Salim","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0162-8433",{"name":155,"orcid":9},"Mahdy S. Othman",{"tldr":157,"method":158,"finding":159,"direction":160,"opportunity":161},"评估克什米尔谷地苹果、梨、樱桃种植户的技术效率及其影响因素。","418户调查数据，DEA测效率，Tobit回归与分数logit分析影响因素。","苹果效率最高，规模效率不足是主因；灌溉、信贷、冷库等显著提升效率。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可结合遥感与物联网数据构建果园投入产出实时效率监测，弥补自报数据局限。","2026-10-21T23:30:07.145395Z",{"id":164,"title":165,"url":166,"summary":167,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":9,"published_at":168,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":169,"score_detail":170,"sources":174,"tags":176,"primary_topic":181,"secondary_topics":182,"classification":189,"search_phrases":218,"slug":221,"view_count":62,"doi":9,"paper":222,"created_at":230},3245,"Shaanxi Kiwi Farmers Break Free from Yield-Security FoMO（陕西猕猴桃农户摆脱\"产量安全错失恐惧\"）——Frontiers Sustain Food Syst 试错经验可破除数字养分管理技术采纳障碍","https:\u002F\u002Fagritechinsights.com\u002Findex.php\u002F2026\u002F09\u002F19\u002Fshaanxi-kiwi-farmers-break-free-from-yield-security-fomo","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 发表研究：马来西亚博特拉大学Xia Li等学者针对中国陕西省675户猕猴桃种植户开展调研，发现\"产量安全错失恐惧（Yield-Security FoMO）\"——农户对不使用每一种可用工具以最大化产量的焦虑——是数字养分管理技术（土壤检测仪、叶绿素仪、农技咨询App等）采纳的主要障碍。研究发现，虽然感知有用性和相对优势能促进采纳，但产量安全错失恐惧对三种技术的采纳意向均呈持续负面影响。然而，参与结构化\"动手试错\"体验的农户更可能采纳土壤检测仪和叶绿素仪，且该恐惧对决策的影响更小。对农技咨询App影响较小，说明试错体验的效应可能因技术而异。该研究为农技企业和政策制定者提供启示：让农户亲手尝试新技术是弥合怀疑与采纳之间鸿沟的关键。","2026-09-19T00:00:00Z",77,{"impact":171,"substance":18,"depth":102,"authority":20,"freshness":172,"relevant":22,"comment":173},16,8,"基于675户调研揭示FoMO阻碍数字养分管理技术采纳、试错体验可缓解，对农技推广有实证参考价值。",[175],{"name":10,"url":166},[177,27,178,179,180],"智慧农业","猕猴桃","陕西","数字农业技术",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[183],{"code":184,"slug":185,"name":186,"path":187,"parent_code":188},"F3","fertilizers","肥料与水肥一体化","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Ffertilizers","F",{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":190},{"candidates":191,"agricultural_evidence":47},[192,196,202,209,213],{"code":33,"score":17,"supported":47,"title":193,"abstract":194,"tags":195},[178],[178],[178],{"code":184,"score":197,"supported":47,"title":198,"abstract":200,"tags":201},11,[199],"养分管理",[199],[],{"code":203,"score":204,"supported":47,"title":205,"abstract":206,"tags":208},"H2",3,[],[207],"土壤",[],{"code":54,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":210,"abstract":211,"tags":212},[],[],[27],{"code":214,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":215,"abstract":216,"tags":217},"I1",[],[],[177],[219,220],"陕西 猕猴桃 数字养分管理","产量安全错失恐惧 农户采纳","陕西猕猴桃数字养分管理-3245",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":223,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":9,"card":224,"direction":160,"ingested_from":229},[],{"tldr":225,"method":226,"finding":227,"direction":160,"opportunity":228},"陕西675户猕猴桃种植户调研发现，产量安全错失恐惧阻碍数字养分管理技术采纳，试错体验可缓解。","对陕西675户猕猴桃种植户问卷调查，分析FoMO与三种数字技术采纳意向关系。","产量安全错失恐惧持续负向影响采纳；动手试错体验提升土壤检测仪和叶绿素仪采纳，对App影响小。","可探究不同数字农业技术中试错体验的差异化机制，设计降低农户FoMO的干预策略。","agent","2026-09-23T00:04:33.090863Z",{"id":232,"title":233,"url":234,"summary":235,"summary_zh":236,"content":9,"source_name":237,"source_url":234,"published_at":238,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":239,"score_detail":240,"sources":242,"tags":244,"primary_topic":248,"secondary_topics":249,"classification":250,"search_phrases":280,"slug":283,"view_count":81,"doi":284,"paper":285,"created_at":301},2122,"Heterogeneous behaviours towards precision agriculture adoption among Italian winegrowers: insights from latent class analysis","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs11119-026-10448-0","Abstract Purpose Precision Agriculture technologies including satellite data, drones, field robots and automatic guidance, are increasingly promoted as tools to improve sustainability, competitiveness, and environmental efficiency in viticulture. However, the adoption of these practices among Italian winegrowers exhibits significant heterogeneity, influenced by a combination of structural and behavioural factors. This study aims to identify distinct groups of Italian winegrowers based on their intentions to adopt PATs, examining how these intentions relate to four behavioural constructs that capture cognitive, social, and risk-related influences. Method The present study integrates a profile-based perspective by estimating a latent-class generalised structural equation model on 272 Italian winegrowers. The model of class membership is predicated upon a multifaceted conceptualisation encompassing risk perception, risk tolerance, perceived ease of use, and subjective norms and the technology-specific five-year intentions are incorporated as class-specific probit intercepts. Results Three qualitatively distinct profiles emerge: risk-sensitive sceptics, selective pragmatists and usability-oriented high adopters with sharply different adoption patterns across technologies. Participation in rural development schemes is the strongest predictor of membership in the higher-propensity latent classes, namely the selective-pragmatist and usability-oriented high-adopter profiles. In addition, familiarity with PATs, male gender and participation in consortium are positively associated with the higher-propensity class, while age shows a weak negative correlation. Conclusion These results inform the design of extension and policy for specific segments, prioritising risk-mitigation trials for cautious growers, targeted information services for select profiles, and integrated PATs bundles for those with a high propensity.","摘要 目的 精准农业技术（Precision Agriculture Technologies，PATs），包括卫星数据、无人机、田间机器人和自动导航，日益被视为提升葡萄栽培可持续性、竞争力和环境效率的工具。然而，意大利葡萄种植者对上述技术的采纳呈现出显著异质性，受到结构性因素与行为因素的共同影响。本研究旨在基于意大利葡萄种植者采纳PATs的意愿识别不同群体，并考察这些意愿如何与四个行为构念相关联，这四个构念分别捕捉认知、社会和风险相关的影响。方法 本研究整合了基于剖面的视角，对272名意大利葡萄种植者估计了潜在类别广义结构方程模型。类别归属模型建立在涵盖风险感知、风险容忍度、感知易用性和主观规范的多维概念化基础之上，并将技术特定的五年意愿作为类别特定的probit截距纳入模型。结果 研究识别出三种性质不同的剖面：风险敏感型怀疑者、选择性实用主义者和以易用性为导向的高采纳者，其在不同技术上的采纳模式差异显著。参与农村发展计划是归属于较高倾向潜在类别（即选择性实用主义者和以易用性为导向的高采纳者剖面）的最强预测因素。此外，对PATs的熟悉程度、男性性别和参与合作社与较高倾向类别呈正相关，而年龄则表现出较弱的负相关。结论 上述结果为针对特定群体的推广和政策设计提供了依据，应优先为谨慎型种植者开展风险缓解试验，为特定剖面提供有针对性的信息服务，并为高倾向群体提供整合的PATs技术组合。","Precision Agriculture","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":171,"substance":18,"depth":102,"authority":46,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":241},"基于272户意大利葡萄种植者的潜类别分析，揭示精准农业采纳的异质性行为分群，对农户分类推广与政策设计有实质参考价值。",[243],{"name":237,"url":234},[177,27,245,246,247],"精准农业","遥感监测","葡萄种植",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":251},{"candidates":252,"agricultural_evidence":47},[253,258,265,271,275],{"code":214,"score":171,"supported":47,"title":254,"abstract":256,"tags":257},[255],"precision agriculture",[245,255],[177,245],{"code":259,"score":91,"supported":47,"title":260,"abstract":261,"tags":264},"G",[],[262,263],"农村发展","rural development",[],{"code":33,"score":266,"supported":47,"title":267,"abstract":268,"tags":270},4,[],[269],"葡萄",[247],{"code":54,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":272,"abstract":273,"tags":274},[],[],[27],{"code":276,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":277,"abstract":278,"tags":279},"I3",[],[],[246],[281,282],"农户采纳 智慧农业 精准农业 葡萄种植","农户采纳 智慧农业","农户采纳智慧农业精准农业葡萄种植-2122","10.1007\u002Fs11119-026-10448-0",{"doi":284,"openalex_id":286,"authors":287,"venue":237,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":234,"card":296,"direction":160,"ingested_from":88},"W7212151394",[288,290,293],{"name":289,"orcid":9},"Adriano Biondo",{"name":291,"orcid":292},"Antonino Galati","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0753-2934",{"name":294,"orcid":295},"Francesco Caracciolo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9430-7529",{"tldr":297,"method":298,"finding":299,"direction":160,"opportunity":300},"基于272名意大利葡萄种植者，用潜类别分析识别精准农业技术采纳意向的异质性群体。","潜类别广义结构方程模型，纳入风险感知、风险容忍、易用性和主观规范。","分出风险敏感怀疑者、选择性实用主义者和易用性高采纳者三类，参与农村发展计划是最强预测因素。","可针对不同农户群体设计差异化推广策略，并研究政策参与如何通过行为路径影响技术采纳。","2026-09-11T23:30:02.943184Z",{"id":303,"title":304,"url":305,"summary":306,"summary_zh":307,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":305,"published_at":308,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":309,"score_detail":310,"sources":313,"tags":315,"primary_topic":321,"secondary_topics":322,"classification":328,"search_phrases":346,"slug":349,"view_count":81,"doi":350,"paper":351,"created_at":373},5547,"Apple quality and soil biological diversity in long-term organic and IPM apple orchards","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1943487","Introduction While several studies have compared fruit quality in organic and conventional apple production, integrated assessments of fruit quality and soil biological diversity remain limited. Majority of previous studies have been based on relatively short-term experimental comparisons, although responses of soil biota and soil properties often require many years of consistent management to become fully expressed. Methods This study compared yield, fruit quality, and soil biological diversity in long-term organic (ORG) apple orchard and long-term integrated pest management (IPM) orchard under Nordic conditions. The study was conducted in 2022–2024 at the Polli Horticultural Research Centre (Estonia) using the cultivars “Katre”, “Krista,” and “Alesja”. Apple, yield, fruit quality attributes (soluble solids and titratable acids content and their ratio, ascorbic acid content and total polyphenols, total anthocyanins, fruit firmness, fruit colour, fruit mineral elements content), soil chemical parameters, earthworm and springtail communities were analysed. Results and Discussion Higher total and fresh-market yields were observed in the IPM orchard in two of the three cultivars, whereas the proportion of fresh-market fruit did not differ consistently between the two orchards. When averaged across cultivars, apples from ORG orchard exhibited more intense peel coloration. Differences in taste-related traits and antioxidant composition between cultivation systems were cultivar- and year-dependent rather than consistently associated with cultivation system. Total polyphenol content was consistently higher under ORG management only in “Katre,” while “Alesja” exhibited the highest total polyphenol and anthocyanin contents irrespective of cultivation system, highlighting the dominant role of genotype. Soil in the ORG orchard had higher pH and greater phosphorus and calcium contents, supporting a higher proportion of anecic earthworms, particularly Aporrectodea longa . Total earthworm abundance was higher in the IPM orchard, springtail abundance did not differ significantly between systems. These results suggest that the conditions in the long-term ORG were more favourable for ecologically important earthworm groups without consistently affecting internal fruit quality compared to IPM orchard.","引言 尽管已有若干研究比较了有机与常规苹果生产中的果实品质，但结合果实品质与土壤生物多样性的综合评价仍较为有限。以往研究大多基于相对短期的试验比较，而土壤生物区系和土壤性质的响应往往需要多年持续一致的管理才能充分显现。方法 本研究在北欧条件下比较了长期有机（ORG）苹果园与长期综合病虫害管理（IPM）苹果园的产量、果实品质及土壤生物多样性。研究于2022—2024年在爱沙尼亚Polli园艺研究中心开展，供试品种为“Katre”“Krista”和“Alesja”。分析了苹果产量、果实品质指标（可溶性固形物与可滴定酸含量及其比值、抗坏血酸含量、总多酚、总花青素、果实硬度、果实色泽、果实矿质元素含量）、土壤化学参数、蚯蚓和跳虫群落。结果与讨论 在3个品种中的2个品种上，IPM果园的总产量和鲜食市场产量较高，而鲜食市场果实比例在两种果园间并无一致差异。按品种平均，ORG果园苹果果皮色泽更深。栽培系统间口感相关性状和抗氧化成分的差异因品种和年份而异，而非与栽培系统稳定相关。总多酚含量仅在“Katre”中于ORG管理下持续较高，而“Alesja”无论栽培系统如何均表现出最高的总多酚和花青素含量，凸显了基因型的主导作用。ORG果园土壤具有较高的pH以及较高的磷和钙含量，支持了较高比例的内栖型蚯蚓，尤其是长穴居蚯蚓（Aporrectodea longa）。IPM果园蚯蚓总丰度较高，跳虫丰度在系统间无显著差异。这些结果表明，与IPM果园相比，长期ORG的条件更有利于生态上重要的蚯蚓类群，但并未对果实内部品质产生一致影响。","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",66,{"impact":172,"substance":311,"depth":171,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":312},20,"北欧长期定位试验对比有机与IPM苹果园的果实品质与土壤生物多样性，结论有新意但属区域尺度研究，公共影响有限。",[314],{"name":10,"url":305},[316,317,318,319,320],"长期定位试验","有机果园","土壤生物多样性","苹果品质","IPM",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[323],{"code":203,"slug":324,"name":325,"path":326,"parent_code":327},"soil","土壤健康与改良","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsoil","H",{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":329},{"candidates":330,"agricultural_evidence":47},[331,336,340],{"code":33,"score":19,"supported":47,"title":332,"abstract":333,"tags":335},[49],[51,334,49],"orchard",[],{"code":203,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":337,"abstract":338,"tags":339},[324],[207,324],[],{"code":341,"score":204,"supported":47,"title":342,"abstract":343,"tags":345},"H6",[],[344],"生物多样性",[],[347,348],"爱沙尼亚 Polli 苹果 有机 IPM","苹果园 蚯蚓 跳虫 土壤","爱沙尼亚Polli苹果有机IPM-5547","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1943487",{"doi":350,"openalex_id":352,"authors":353,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":305,"card":368,"direction":86,"ingested_from":88},"W7223104118",[354,357,360,362,365],{"name":355,"orcid":356},"Ulvi Moor","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8808-8494",{"name":358,"orcid":359},"Annely Kuu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0335-6243",{"name":361,"orcid":9},"K. Kahu",{"name":363,"orcid":364},"P. Põldma","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7906-823X",{"name":366,"orcid":367},"Reelika Rätsep","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8673-9978",{"tldr":369,"method":370,"finding":371,"direction":86,"opportunity":372},"比较长期有机与IPM苹果园的果实品质和土壤生物多样性。","在爱沙尼亚长期试验园测定三个品种的产量、品质及蚯蚓和跳虫群落。","有机园果皮色泽更深、土壤pH和磷钙更高，但果实内在品质差异多随品种和年份变化。","可结合长期定位试验，量化土壤动物群落与果实品质的关联机制，并拓展多区域验证。","2026-10-22T11:20:15.557635Z",{"id":375,"title":376,"url":377,"summary":378,"summary_zh":9,"content":379,"source_name":380,"source_url":9,"published_at":381,"category":382,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":383,"score_detail":384,"sources":386,"tags":388,"primary_topic":392,"secondary_topics":393,"classification":394,"search_phrases":410,"slug":413,"view_count":81,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":414},5516,"上海农科院葡萄团队赴银川参加第47届世界葡萄与葡萄酒大会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.saas.sh.cn\u002Fhzjl\u002Fgjhz\u002Fcontent_57128","10月12日至16日第47届世界葡萄与葡萄酒大会在银川举办，智慧农业研究中心葡萄团队负责人奚晓军研究员作专题报告，阐明疏穗与环剥处理对果实糖、花青素及脱落酸积累的源库调控机制。团队还观摩酿酒葡萄AI综合作业机器人成果展示，与研发单位围绕葡萄智慧装备与果园智能化管理深入交流。","2026年10月12-16日，第47届世界葡萄与葡萄酒大会在银川举办，智慧农业研究中心葡萄团队负责人奚晓军研究员一行赴会交流。团队围绕“提升葡萄种植生产韧性与可持续发展能力”主题，向全球同行展示最新科研成果。\n\n会上，奚晓军作“Changes in sugar, anthocyanin and ABA accumulation in response to cluster thinning and girdling in ‘Jumeigui’grape”专题报告。报告围绕葡萄疏穗与环剥处理开展研究，阐明源库比对果实糖、花青素及脱落酸积累的调控机制，为葡萄优质栽培技术提供理论支撑，报告内容引发国内外园艺专家广泛研讨。参会期间，团队前往银川国际会展中心观摩酿酒葡萄 AI 综合作业机器人成果展示，详细了解该装备在葡萄园智能作业方面的技术特点与应用前景，并与研发单位围绕葡萄智慧装备研发、果园智能化管理等方向开展深入交流。\n\n本次参会是葡萄团队持续推进科研国际化、对标国际前沿开展研究的重要实践。","上海市农业科学院 2026-10-19","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z","报道",65,{"impact":171,"substance":19,"depth":20,"authority":20,"freshness":91,"relevant":22,"comment":385},"国际学术会议交流并涉及葡萄AI作业机器人观摩，有实质科研内容与行业参考价值，但属团队参会动态，影响面有限。",[387],{"name":380,"url":377},[177,389,269,390,391],"智能农机","栽培技术","国际交流",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":395},{"candidates":396,"agricultural_evidence":47},[397,401,405],{"code":33,"score":17,"supported":47,"title":398,"abstract":399,"tags":400},[269],[269],[269],{"code":214,"score":266,"supported":47,"title":402,"abstract":403,"tags":404},[],[177],[177],{"code":406,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":407,"abstract":408,"tags":409},"F5",[],[],[389],[411,412],"上海农科院 葡萄 银川","世界葡萄与葡萄酒大会 奚晓军","上海农科院葡萄银川-5516","2026-10-22T00:07:04.061911Z",{"id":416,"title":417,"url":418,"summary":419,"summary_zh":420,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":418,"published_at":99,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":169,"score_detail":421,"sources":423,"tags":425,"primary_topic":430,"secondary_topics":431,"classification":432,"search_phrases":456,"slug":459,"view_count":81,"doi":460,"paper":461,"created_at":475},5464,"From symbolic to substantive: How subsidy design shapes cooperative roles and high-quality rural industrial development?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1949418","Introduction Government subsidies do not necessarily produce high-quality rural industrial development (HQRID), as different subsidy designs elicit different behavioral responses from cooperatives and smallholders. This study examines how subsidy design shapes the strategies of local governments, cooperatives, and farmers. Methods Drawing on the Dingzhuang Grape Cooperative in Jurong, China, this study builds a tripartite evolutionary game model to examine how creation support and function support shape the strategies of the local government, cooperative, and farmer. Results The results distinguish two contrasting pathways. Creation support tends to induce symbolic compliance, in which cooperatives adopt formal structures without providing training, quality control, or market access, leading the system toward a low-quality equilibrium. Function support aligns cooperative incentives with verifiable performance and encourages substantive services that connect smallholders to higher-value markets. Three conclusions follow. First, the transition to substantive service requires function support that gives cooperatives sufficiently strong incentives. Second, substantive services lower the quality-premium share that farmers require, strengthening the economic case for high-quality production. Third, function support is bounded by fiscal capacity, and excessive performance-linked payments can reverse the transition. Discussion Policy should therefore tie support to measurable gains in farmer income and product quality. The study contributes to induced institutional change theory by specifying that external inducements produce substantive institutions only when rewards are tied to verifiable performance rather than to registration, a boundary condition that explains why supported organizations may remain hollow.","引言 政府补贴并不必然带来高质量的农村产业发展（HQRID），因为不同的补贴设计会引发合作社与小农户不同的行为反应。本研究考察补贴设计如何塑造地方政府、合作社与农户的策略。方法 本研究以中国句容市丁庄葡萄合作社为案例，构建三方演化博弈模型，考察创建支持与功能支持如何塑造地方政府、合作社与农户的策略。结果 结果区分出两条截然不同的路径。创建支持倾向于诱发象征性遵从，即合作社采取正式结构却不提供培训、质量控制或市场准入，使系统趋向低质量均衡。功能支持使合作社激励与可验证绩效相一致，并鼓励将小农户连接至更高价值市场的实质性服务。由此得出三点结论。第一，向实质性服务的转变需要功能支持，使合作社获得足够强的激励。第二，实质性服务降低了农户所需的质量溢价份额，强化了高质量生产的经济合理性。第三，功能支持受财政能力约束，过度的绩效挂钩支付可能逆转这一转变。讨论 因此，政策应将支持与农户收入和产品质量的可测量改善挂钩。本研究对诱致性制度变迁理论作出贡献，明确指出外部诱因只有在奖励与可验证绩效而非与登记注册挂钩时才会产生实质性制度，这一边界条件解释了受支持组织为何可能保持空壳化。",{"impact":171,"substance":18,"depth":102,"authority":20,"freshness":172,"relevant":22,"comment":422},"以句容葡萄合作社为案例的三方演化博弈研究，区分创建型与功能型补贴对合作社行为的影响，结论对补贴政策设计有实质参考价值。",[424],{"name":10,"url":418},[426,427,428,429],"乡村产业","合作社","小农户","补贴设计",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":433},{"candidates":434,"agricultural_evidence":47},[435,440,445,451],{"code":33,"score":91,"supported":47,"title":436,"abstract":437,"tags":439},[],[269,438],"grape",[],{"code":54,"score":441,"supported":47,"title":442,"abstract":443,"tags":444},5,[],[428],[427,428],{"code":446,"score":204,"supported":47,"title":447,"abstract":448,"tags":450},"G6",[],[449],"农户收入",[],{"code":452,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":453,"abstract":454,"tags":455},"G4",[],[],[426],[457,458],"句容 丁庄 葡萄合作社","补贴设计 合作社 小农户","句容丁庄葡萄合作社-5464","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1949418",{"doi":460,"openalex_id":462,"authors":463,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":418,"card":470,"direction":160,"ingested_from":88},"W7222997429",[464,466,468],{"name":465,"orcid":9},"Man Huang",{"name":467,"orcid":9},"蒋礼文",{"name":469,"orcid":9},"Jincai Zhuang",{"tldr":471,"method":472,"finding":473,"direction":160,"opportunity":474},"用三方演化博弈分析补贴设计如何影响合作社行为与农村产业高质量发展。","构建政府、合作社、农户三方演化博弈模型，基于句容丁庄葡萄合作社案例。","创建型补贴诱发象征性合规，功能型补贴促成实质性服务并降低农户质量溢价要求。","可将补贴绩效挂钩机制与可验证数据采集结合，研究数字化考核如何抑制合作社空心化。","2026-10-21T23:30:06.732822Z"]