[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4446":3,"related-4446":58},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":18,"tags":20,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":21,"classification":22,"search_phrases":37,"slug":38,"view_count":15,"doi":39,"paper":40,"created_at":57},4446,"Penerapan Metode Hybrid SAW-WP dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penggunaan Platform Digital Meeting","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.59024\u002Fjiti.v4i4.2569","This study addresses the selection of free digital meeting platforms, where user choice may be influenced by habit and popularity rather than a structured multi-criteria assessment. The study aims to evaluate Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams using a Decision Support System based on a hybrid Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) approach. A quantitative descriptive design was applied using questionnaire data from 230 respondents who had experience using at least two of the three platforms for educational and\u002For professional activities. Four benefit criteria were evaluated: popularity, user interface\u002Fuser experience (UI\u002FUX), accessibility, and user satisfaction. SAW was used to normalize the decision matrix, after which the normalized values were processed using WP with criterion weights of 2, 3, 3, and 2, respectively. The detailed calculation produced preference values of 0.514 for Zoom, 0.450 for Google Meet, and 0.036 for Microsoft Teams. Thus, the resulting order was Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. The findings indicate that the hybrid procedure can integrate usage intensity and perceived quality dimensions into a transparent decision-support process. The result is applicable within the respondent context and criteria used in this study.","本研究探讨了免费数字会议平台的选择问题，用户的选择可能受习惯和流行度影响，而非基于结构化的多准则评估。本研究旨在采用基于混合简单加权法（SAW）与加权乘积法（WP）的决策支持系统，对Zoom、Google Meet和Microsoft Teams进行评估。研究采用定量描述性设计，使用来自230名受访者的问卷数据，这些受访者具有在教育或职业活动中使用这三个平台中至少两个的经验。研究评估了四项效益准则：流行度、用户界面\u002F用户体验（UI\u002FUX）、可及性和用户满意度。使用SAW对决策矩阵进行归一化，随后将归一化值以准则权重分别为2、3、3和2通过WP进行处理。详细计算得出的偏好值为：Zoom为0.514，Google Meet为0.450，Microsoft Teams为0.036。因此，排序结果为Zoom、Google Meet和Microsoft Teams。研究结果表明，该混合方法能够将使用强度和感知质量维度整合到一个透明的决策支持过程中。该结果适用于本研究的受访者情境和所用准则。",null,"JURNAL ILMIAH SAINS TEKNOLOGI DAN INFORMASI","2026-10-06T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,0,{"impact":15,"substance":15,"depth":15,"authority":15,"freshness":15,"relevant":15,"comment":17},"该论文研究在线会议平台的多准则决策方法，与三农、农业信息化、智慧农业、数字乡村等主题无关，不予入选。",[19],{"name":10,"url":6},[12],[],{"status":23,"locked":14,"version":24,"method":25,"evidence":26},"needs_review","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":27,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":36},[28],{"code":29,"score":30,"supported":31,"title":32,"abstract":33,"tags":35},"I2",3,true,[],[34],"decision support",[],"农业相关性需要复核",[],"PenerapanMetodeHybridSAW-WPdalamSistemPe-4446","10.59024\u002Fjiti.v4i4.2569",{"doi":39,"openalex_id":41,"authors":42,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":15,"oa_url":49,"card":50,"direction":54,"ingested_from":56},"W7220710566",[43,45,47],{"name":44,"orcid":9},"Hana Khairunnas",{"name":46,"orcid":9},"Frisky Suryo Lam Aji",{"name":48,"orcid":9},"Andri Prayoga","https:\u002F\u002Fjurnal.alimspublishing.co.id\u002Findex.php\u002FJITI\u002Farticle\u002Fdownload\u002F2569\u002F1756",{"tldr":51,"method":52,"finding":53,"direction":54,"opportunity":55},"用SAW-WP混合方法评估Zoom、Google Meet和Teams，选出最佳免费数字会议平台。","问卷230人，SAW归一化后WP加权，四项效益准则。","偏好值Zoom 0.514最高，Google Meet 0.450，Teams 0.036最低。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将该混合决策模型迁移至农业数字平台或农技推广工具选型，结合农户特征优化权重。","openalex","2026-10-08T23:30:40.787683Z",{"total":15,"page":59,"page_size":59,"items":60},1,[]]