[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4739":3,"related-4739":127},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":28,"primary_topic":34,"secondary_topics":40,"classification":52,"search_phrases":107,"slug":110,"view_count":22,"doi":111,"paper":112,"created_at":126},4739,"Regenerating Rural Futures Through Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations: A Systems Perspective on Building Climate Resilience, Food Security and Inclusive Rural Prosperity in Nigeria","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298251","Rural Nigeria stands at a defining crossroads. Although agriculture remains central to national food security, employment and rural livelihoods, the ecological, economic and institutional systems that sustain agricultural production are under increasing pressure. Climate variability, land degradation, biodiversity loss, demographic change, market volatility and institutional constraints are interacting in ways that threaten both agricultural productivity and the resilience of rural communities. These challenges are deeply interconnected and cannot be addressed through isolated sectoral interventions or yield-focused agricultural policies alone. This paper examines the regeneration of rural futures through the lens of Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA), arguing that CSA should be understood not merely as a collection of improved farming practices but as an integrated systems framework for rural transformation. Drawing upon contemporary scholarship in climate science, agricultural development, resilience studies, ecological restoration, rural sociology and institutional governance, the paper explores how climate-smart approaches can contribute simultaneously to agricultural productivity, climate resilience, environmental sustainability and inclusive rural prosperity. Focusing on Nigeria, the analysis examines the country’s diverse agroecological zones, evolving climate risks, smallholder farming systems, demographic transitions and institutional landscape. The paper demonstrates that effective climate-smart strategies must be locally adaptive while remaining aligned with nationally coherent development objectives. It argues that Nigeria’s long-term agricultural competitiveness will depend less on expanding cultivated land and more on improving the resilience, productivity and sustainability of existing farming systems through knowledge-intensive innovation, ecosystem restoration, digital technologies, strengthened rural institutions and integrated value chain development. The paper further contends that sustainable rural transformation requires moving beyond fragmented development projects towards Rural Resilience Ecosystems in which agriculture, environmental management, community institutions, infrastructure, digital technologies, enterprise development and knowledge systems function as mutually reinforcing components of a coherent development strategy. Within this framework, the Climate-Smart Farmer Hub is presented as an operational example of how climate-smart agriculture, rural innovation, environmental stewardship and community capacity development can be integrated within locally responsive institutional systems that support broader national objectives for sustainable agricultural transformation and climate resilience. The paper concludes that Regenerating Rural Futures provides a useful systems-oriented paradigm for understanding how ecological integrity, economic opportunity, institutional effectiveness and community wellbeing can be strengthened simultaneously. By integrating contemporary scholarship with the realities of Nigerian agriculture and an original community-centred institutional framework, the study contributes an evidence-informed analytical perspective for advancing climate-smart agriculture, rural resilience and sustainable rural transformation in Nigeria and comparable development contexts.","尼日利亚农村正处在一个决定性的十字路口。尽管农业仍然是国家粮食安全、就业和农村生计的核心，但支撑农业生产的生态、经济和制度体系正面临日益增大的压力。气候变率、土地退化、生物多样性丧失、人口变化、市场波动和制度约束相互交织，威胁着农业生产力和农村社区的韧性。这些挑战深度关联，无法仅通过孤立的部门干预或以产量为导向的农业政策加以解决。本文从气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）的视角审视农村未来的再生，主张CSA不应仅被理解为一系列改良农业实践的集合，而应被视为农村转型的综合系统框架。本文借鉴气候科学、农业发展、韧性研究、生态恢复、农村社会学和制度治理领域的当代学术成果，探讨气候智慧型方法如何能够同时促进农业生产力、气候韧性、环境可持续性和包容性农村繁荣。以尼日利亚为焦点，本文分析了该国多样的农业生态区、不断演变的气候风险、小农耕作系统、人口转型和制度格局。本文表明，有效的气候智慧型战略必须具有地方适应性，同时与国家连贯的发展目标保持一致。本文认为，尼日利亚的长期农业竞争力将较少取决于扩大耕地面积，而更多取决于通过知识密集型创新、生态系统恢复、数字技术、强化的农村机构和综合价值链发展来提升现有耕作系统的韧性、生产力和可持续性。本文进一步主张，可持续的农村转型需要超越碎片化的发展项目，迈向农村韧性生态系统，在这一系统中，农业、环境管理、社区机构、基础设施、数字技术、企业发展 and 知识体系作为连贯发展战略中相互强化的组成部分发挥作用。在这一框架内，气候智慧型农民中心（Climate-Smart Farmer Hub）作为一个操作实例被提出，展示气候智",null,"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z","论文",25,false,78,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},18,21,17,12,10,1,"以系统视角论述尼日利亚气候智慧农业与农村韧性建设，提出社区型制度框架，具参考价值但属境外研究。",[25,26],{"name":10,"url":6},{"name":10,"url":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298250",[29,30,31,32,33],"数字乡村","农业数字化","气候智慧农业","小农韧性","农村转型",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},"A8","yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security","A",[41,47],{"code":42,"slug":43,"name":44,"path":45,"parent_code":46},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":56},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":57,"agricultural_evidence":60},[58,66,71,77,84,91,97,102],{"code":35,"score":59,"supported":60,"title":61,"abstract":63,"tags":65},14,true,[62],"food security",[64,62],"粮食安全",[],{"code":48,"score":20,"supported":60,"title":67,"abstract":69,"tags":70},[68],"climate resilience",[68],[31],{"code":72,"score":20,"supported":60,"title":73,"abstract":75,"tags":76},"I1",[74],"smart agriculture",[74],[30],{"code":42,"score":78,"supported":60,"title":79,"abstract":80,"tags":83},9,[],[81,82,43],"生物多样性","农业生态",[],{"code":85,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":87,"abstract":88,"tags":90},"G2",3,[],[89],"smallholder",[],{"code":92,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":93,"abstract":94,"tags":96},"J1",[],[95],"农业政策",[],{"code":98,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":99,"abstract":100,"tags":101},"I",[],[],[30],{"code":103,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":104,"abstract":105,"tags":106},"I6",[],[],[29],[108,109],"尼日利亚 气候智慧农业","气候智慧农业 农业数字化 农村转型 小农韧性","尼日利亚气候智慧农业-4739","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23298251",{"doi":111,"openalex_id":113,"authors":114,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":6,"card":118,"direction":124,"ingested_from":125},"W7221462831",[115],{"name":116,"orcid":9},"Franklin N. Ellah",0,{"tldr":119,"method":120,"finding":121,"direction":122,"opportunity":123},"本文从系统视角探讨气候智慧型农业如何推动尼日利亚农村再生，兼顾气候韧性、粮食安全与包容性繁荣。","基于气候科学、农业发展、韧性研究等多学科文献，结合尼日利亚农业生态区与制度分析。","气候智慧型农业应作为整合系统框架，通过知识创新、数字技术、生态修复与制度强化提升现有系统韧性。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究气候智慧型农业系统框架在不同农业生态区的本地化适配与数字技术赋能机制。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-10-12T23:30:07.631373Z",{"total":128,"page":22,"page_size":128,"items":129},6,[130,224,332,421,490,559],{"id":131,"title":132,"url":133,"summary":134,"summary_zh":135,"content":9,"source_name":136,"source_url":133,"published_at":137,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":21,"is_selected":14,"score":138,"score_detail":139,"sources":143,"tags":145,"primary_topic":149,"secondary_topics":150,"classification":157,"search_phrases":201,"slug":204,"view_count":117,"doi":205,"paper":206,"created_at":223},5478,"Characterisation of Food Security Situation for Smallholder Farmers in Zvimba","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30","This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the food security situation among smallholder farmers (SHFs) in Zvimba District, Zimbabwe. Smallholder agriculture is the bedrock of Zimbabwe's food system, yet it remains highly vulnerable to a complex array of shocks and stressors. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research investigates the prevalence, drivers and lived experiences of food insecurity within this community. A structured survey was administered to 412 randomly selected smallholder households across the district's wards. The quantitative data were supplemented by 12 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 24 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with farmers, community leaders and agricultural extension officers to capture qualitative nuances. The study is grounded in the Food Security Theory (FST), which conceptualises food security through its four pillars: food availability, food access, food utilisation and food stability. Findings reveal a precarious food security situation. Quantitatively, 78.4% of households were found to be food insecure, with an average Hunger Months Index of 4.7 months per year. The study identifies a significant disconnect between maize production, the national staple and household consumption, with over 65% of households failing to produce enough maize to meet their annual requirements. Qualitative data illuminated the multi-faceted drivers of this insecurity. Key points to note include climate change whereby erratic rainfall and prolonged mid-season dry spells were consistently reported as the primary production challenges, limited access to farming inputs whereby high costs and unreliable supplies of certified seeds, fertilizers and agro[1]chemicals constrain productivity. Morelso, socio-economic factors such as poverty, lack of viable alternative livelihoods and limited access to formal credit perpetuate a cycle of vulnerability. In addition, institutional weaknesses, for example, challenges with agricultural extension services and market inefficiencies, exacerbate the situation. The study concludes that food insecurity in Zvimba is not merely a problem of food production, but is deeply rooted in structural issues affecting food access, food utilisation, as well as food stability. Recommendations are proposed for a multi-sectoral approach, including promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) and drought-resistant crops, strengthening input support systems and rural finance, diversifying livelihood strategies and enhancing the capacity of extension services. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the localised dynamics of food security and provides evidence-based guidance for policymakers, development practitioners and the farmers of Zvimba themselves.","本研究对津巴布韦兹维姆巴区小农户（smallholder farmers, SHFs）的粮食安全状况进行了全面分析。小农农业是津巴布韦粮食体系的基石，但仍极易受到一系列复杂冲击和压力的影响。本研究采用混合方法，考察了该社区粮食不安全的普遍程度、驱动因素及生活体验。研究对该区各选区随机抽取的412户小农户进行了结构化问卷调查。定量数据辅以12次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）和24次关键知情人访谈（KIIs），访谈对象包括农民、社区领袖和农业推广人员，以捕捉定性层面的细微差异。本研究以粮食安全理论（Food Security Theory, FST）为基础，该理论通过四大支柱界定粮食安全：粮食可供性、粮食获取、粮食利用和粮食稳定性。研究结果揭示了严峻的粮食安全形势。定量数据显示，78.4%的家庭存在粮食不安全，年均饥饿月份指数为4.7个月。研究发现，玉米产量——该国主粮——与家庭消费之间存在显著脱节，超过65%的家庭生产的玉米不足以满足其年度需求。定性数据揭示了这一不安全状况的多重驱动因素。值得注意的要点包括：气候变化，即降雨不稳定和持续的中期干旱被一致报告为主要生产挑战；农业投入品获取受限，即认证种子、化肥和农用化学品成本高昂且供应不可靠，制约了生产力。此外，贫困、缺乏可行的替代生计以及正规信贷获取受限等社会经济因素使脆弱性循环持续存在。此外，制度薄弱环节，例如农业推广服务面临的挑战和市场效率低下，加剧了这一状况。研究得出结论，兹维姆巴的粮食不安全不仅仅是粮食生产问题，而是深深植根于影响粮食获取、粮食利用以及粮食稳定性的结构性问题。研究提出了采取多部门方法的建议，包括推广气候智能型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）和抗旱作物、加强投入品支持体系和农村金融、多样化生计策略以及增强","Ngenani The Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti Journal of Community Engagement and Societal Transformations","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",55,{"impact":140,"substance":17,"depth":141,"authority":128,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":142},8,15,"基于412户调查与混合方法的扎实实证研究，但属津巴布韦地方性案例，公共影响与信源权威度有限，可作参考而非每日精选。",[144],{"name":136,"url":133},[64,146,31,147,148],"小农户","农业推广","津巴布韦",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[151,156],{"code":85,"slug":152,"name":153,"path":154,"parent_code":155},"farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":158},{"candidates":159,"agricultural_evidence":60},[160,164,168,176,183,190,197],{"code":35,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":161,"abstract":162,"tags":163},[62],[64,62],[64],{"code":85,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":165,"abstract":166,"tags":167},[89],[146,89],[146],{"code":48,"score":21,"supported":60,"title":169,"abstract":170,"tags":175},[],[171,172,173,174],"气候变化","干旱","climate change","drought",[31],{"code":177,"score":178,"supported":60,"title":179,"abstract":180,"tags":182},"G1",7,[],[147,181],"agricultural extension",[147],{"code":184,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":185,"abstract":186,"tags":189},"A3",[],[187,188],"玉米","maize",[],{"code":191,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":192,"abstract":193,"tags":196},"G3",[],[194,195],"农村金融","rural finance",[],{"code":72,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":198,"abstract":199,"tags":200},[],[74],[],[202,203],"Zvimba 小农户 粮食安全","津巴布韦 小农 玉米","Zvimba小农户粮食安全-5478","10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30",{"doi":205,"openalex_id":207,"authors":208,"venue":136,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":9,"card":217,"direction":124,"ingested_from":125},"W7223029383",[209,212,215],{"name":210,"orcid":211},"Casper Myambo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-8625-7526",{"name":213,"orcid":214},"Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4123-0238",{"name":216,"orcid":9},"Patience Mutopo",{"tldr":218,"method":219,"finding":220,"direction":221,"opportunity":222},"调查津巴布韦Zvimba小农户粮食安全状况，分析其普遍性、成因与实际体验。","混合方法：412户问卷、12场焦点小组、24个关键人物访谈，基于粮食安全四支柱理","78.4%家庭粮食不安全，年均饥饿月4.7个月，主因是气候、投入、社会经济与制度等结构性问题。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索用移动端问卷与遥感产量监测构建小农户粮食安全动态预警与精准干预系统。","2026-10-21T23:30:08.937079Z",{"id":225,"title":226,"url":227,"summary":228,"summary_zh":229,"content":9,"source_name":230,"source_url":227,"published_at":231,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":21,"is_selected":14,"score":232,"score_detail":233,"sources":238,"tags":240,"primary_topic":243,"secondary_topics":244,"classification":247,"search_phrases":314,"slug":317,"view_count":117,"doi":318,"paper":319,"created_at":331},5185,"When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182","When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya For generations, farmers in Western Kenya have watched the skies carefully. The arrival, duration, and distribution of rainfall have traditionally provided important signals about when to prepare land, plant, weed, and harvest. But these signals are becoming increasingly difficult to read. Climate change is altering rainfall patterns, while increasingly frequent extreme weather events are making farming more uncertain. The current outlook for the October–December 2026 season brings this challenge sharply into focus. The IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC) forecasts a wetter-than-normal season across much of the Greater Horn of Africa. The Lake Victoria Basin, which includes large parts of Western Kenya, is among the areas with a high likelihood of receiving more than 400 mm of seasonal rainfall. ICPAC reports that El Niño has developed and is expected to strengthen, while a positive Indian Ocean Dipole is also expected—climate conditions that are commonly associated with enhanced rainfall in the region, and is likely to run into February of 2027. But what does this mean for the smallholder farmer? The first point is that more rainfall does not necessarily mean more food. For a farmer whose livelihood depends almost entirely on rain-fed agriculture, abundant rainfall can be a blessing. It can replenish streams and water sources, improve soil moisture, restore pasture and create favourable conditions for crop production. If well distributed, the rains could contribute to improved harvests and household food supplies. The problem arises when rainfall is too intense, too concentrated or poorly distributed. A farmer may receive a great deal of rain in a few days and then experience a dry spell. Another farmer a few kilometres away may receive considerably less. Heavy downpours can cause flooding, waterlogging and soil erosion. Seeds may be washed away soon after planting. Young crops can be submerged or damaged. Valuable topsoil and nutrients can be carried away, reducing the productivity of land in subsequent seasons. This is particularly important in Western Kenya, where many households depend on small parcels of land for both food and income. A failed or damaged crop is not simply an agricultural loss. It can mean less food in the household, less money for school fees and health care, and fewer resources to purchase nutritious foods. The food-security paradox We must, therefore, look beyond agricultural production to food and nutrition security. A household may produce enough maize yet still have a poor diet if vegetables, legumes, fruits, milk, eggs or other foods are unavailable or unaffordable. Climate shocks can reduce this diversity. When crops are damaged, families may depend more heavily on whatever staple food remains available. This is why climate resilience must also be nutrition-sensitive. Western Kenya has a rich agricultural tradition and considerable potential for diversified food production. Farmers grow cereals, legumes, vegetables and root crops and keep livestock and poultry. Such diversity is not merely an agricultural advantage; it is a nutritional resource. It can provide different foods, spread risk and generate income at different times of the year. Climate adaptation should, therefore, not encourage farmers simply to produce more of one crop. It should help them build diverse and resilient farming systems. Women carry a large part of the burden The impact of erratic and excessive rainfall also has a gender dimension. Women in smallholder households are often deeply involved in food production, processing, preparation and household nutrition. When harvests fail, or food prices rise, women frequently have to find ways of stretching limited household resources to feed the family. When roads become impassable or markets are disrupted, women may have greater difficulty accessing food and agricultural inputs. When water sources are contaminated or damaged, household responsibilities can become even more demanding. Climate adaptation must therefore deliberately include women—not simply as beneficiaries, but as decision-makers, innovators, farmers and leaders. Young people must also be part of the solution There is another group that deserves greater attention: young people. Western Kenya cannot build climate-resilient agriculture while treating agriculture as an occupation of the past. Young people need to see opportunities in modern farming, agro-processing, food safety, climate information services, irrigation, digital agriculture and agricultural entrepreneurship. The increasing unpredictability of climate may actually provide an opportunity to make agriculture more innovative. Young people can help introduce new technologies, improve access to climate information, develop value-added products and create businesses around food production and processing. From forecasting to action The availability of a climate forecast is useful only if it reaches the people who need it in time. Farmers need information that answers practical questions: When should I plant? Which crops or varieties are appropriate? How can I protect my soil? What should I do if rainfall becomes excessive? How can I protect harvested food? Where can I obtain reliable seed and other inputs? Seasonal forecasts should, therefore, be translated into local, practical agricultural advice. ICPAC itself emphasizes that seasonal forecasts should be used together with weekly and monthly forecasts and national meteorological information. This requires stronger links between meteorological services, agricultural extension officers, researchers, county governments, farmer organizations and communities. We should also strengthen simple but important measures: water harvesting, drainage, terracing and soil conservation; planting crops and varieties suited to local conditions; maintaining vegetation cover; diversifying crops and livestock; improving storage facilities; and protecting food from moisture and contamination. Prepare before the rain comes The greatest lesson from the current El Niño outlook is perhaps that preparedness must begin before the first heavy rains arrive. Governments and development partners should not wait for floods, damaged roads, destroyed crops or food shortages before responding. Early warning should lead to early action. Farmers should be supported to prepare their farms, protect livestock, secure seed and inputs, strengthen food storage and identify alternative routes to markets. This is particularly important because the same season can produce both opportunities and losses. ICPAC notes that enhanced rainfall can support agricultural production and replenish water resources, but can simultaneously increase the risk of flooding, flash floods and landslides in vulnerable areas. A changing climate requires a different agricultural mindset Perhaps the most important change we need is in the way we think about farming. For too long, agricultural planning has often assumed that rainfall will behave according to a familiar calendar. That assumption is becoming increasingly unsafe. Farmers now have to manage not only too little rain, but also too much rain, rain at the wrong time and rain in the wrong place. The challenge is, therefore, not simply to produce more food. It is to build food systems that can continue providing adequate, diverse, safe and nutritious food under increasingly uncertain climatic conditions. Western Kenya's smallholder farmers should not be left alone to carry this burden. They need science that responds to their realities, extension services that reach them, climate information they can understand and use, financial services that help them manage risk, markets that function during difficult seasons, and policies that recognize the central role of smallholder agriculture in national food and nutrition security, and partners who are willing to appreciate and make use of indigenous knowledge. El Niño should, therefore, be viewed neither simply as a disaster nor automatically as a blessing. It is a climate event whose consequences will depend greatly on our preparedness. The question before us is not merely, “Will the rains come?” They probably will. The more important question is: Will our farmers, food systems and institutions be ready when they do? That is where climate resilience—and ultimately food and nutrition security—will be tested. Prof. Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o Founder and Editor-in-Chief, AJFAND ORCiD: https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","当雨水过多时：厄尔尼诺现象、小农户与肯尼亚西部的粮食安全\n\n世代以来，肯尼亚西部的农民一直密切关注着天空。降雨的到来、持续时间和分布，传统上为何时整地、播种、除草和收获提供了重要信号。但这些信号正变得越来越难以解读。气候变化正在改变降雨模式，而日益频繁的极端天气事件使农业变得更加不确定。当前对2026年10月至12月季节的展望使这一挑战凸显出来。政府间发展组织气候预测与应用中心（ICPAC）预测，大非洲之角大部分地区将迎来高于正常水平的湿润季节。维多利亚湖流域——包括肯尼亚西部的大部分地区——属于极有可能获得超过400毫米季节性降雨的区域之一。ICPAC报告称，厄尔尼诺现象已经形成并预计将增强，同时预计还将出现正印度洋偶极子——这些气候条件通常与该地区降雨增强相关，并可能持续到2027年2月。但这对小农户意味着什么？首先，更多降雨并不必然意味着更多粮食。对于生计几乎完全依赖雨养农业的农民来说，充沛的降雨可能是福。它可以补充溪流和水源、改善土壤湿度、恢复牧场，并为作物生产创造有利条件。如果分布良好，降雨可能有助于改善收成和家庭粮食供应。问题出现在降雨过于猛烈、过于集中或分布不均的时候。一个农民可能在几天内获得大量降雨，随后又经历一段干旱期。几公里外的另一个农民可能获得的降雨少得多。暴雨可能引发洪水、渍涝和土壤侵蚀。种子可能在播种后不久被冲走。幼苗可能被淹没或受损。宝贵的表土和养分可能被带走，降低土地在后续季节的生产力。这在肯尼亚西部尤为重要，因为许多家庭依赖小块土地获取食物和收入。作物歉收或受损不仅仅是农业损失。它可能意味着家庭食物减少、用于学费和医疗的钱减少，以及购买营养食品的资源减少。粮食安全……","African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":17,"substance":234,"depth":235,"authority":236,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":237},20,16,13,"核心期刊评论文章，结合El Niño预测讨论小农户气候适应与粮食营养安全，有实质分析与行动建议，但属区域案例、非信息化技术突破。",[239],{"name":230,"url":227},[241,64,146,31,242],"肯尼亚","气候预警",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[245,246],{"code":85,"slug":152,"name":153,"path":154,"parent_code":155},{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":248},{"candidates":249,"agricultural_evidence":60},[250,254,258,263,270,274,280,286,292,298,304,308],{"code":35,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":251,"abstract":252,"tags":253},[62],[64,62],[64],{"code":85,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":255,"abstract":256,"tags":257},[89],[146,89],[146],{"code":48,"score":21,"supported":60,"title":259,"abstract":260,"tags":262},[],[171,172,173,68,261],"waterlogging",[31],{"code":264,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":265,"abstract":266,"tags":269},"H2",[],[267,268],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":184,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":271,"abstract":272,"tags":273},[],[188],[],{"code":275,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":276,"abstract":277,"tags":279},"B4",[],[278],"月季",[],{"code":281,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":282,"abstract":283,"tags":285},"C",[],[284],"livestock",[],{"code":287,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":288,"abstract":289,"tags":291},"C3",[],[290],"poultry",[],{"code":293,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":294,"abstract":295,"tags":297},"E4",[],[296],"food safety",[],{"code":299,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":300,"abstract":301,"tags":303},"F4",[],[302],"除草",[],{"code":177,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":307},[],[181],[],{"code":309,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":310,"abstract":311,"tags":313},"H3",[],[312],"irrigation",[],[315,316],"El Niño 小农户 粮食安全","ICPAC 季节预报 肯尼亚","ElNiño小农户粮食安全-5185","10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182",{"doi":318,"openalex_id":320,"authors":321,"venue":230,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":325,"card":326,"direction":221,"ingested_from":125},"W7222630373",[322],{"name":323,"orcid":324},"Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","https:\u002F\u002Fajfand.net\u002FVolume26\u002FNo8\u002FEditorialVol26No8.pdf",{"tldr":327,"method":328,"finding":329,"direction":122,"opportunity":330},"分析厄尔尼诺导致肯尼亚西部降雨过量对小农粮食安全的影响","基于ICPAC季节气候预测与厄尔尼诺、印度洋偶极子分析","降雨过多且分布不均会引发洪涝、土壤侵蚀，反而威胁小农粮食安全","可结合遥感与农户调查，量化极端降雨时空分布对小农产量与粮食安全的非线性影响","2026-10-17T23:30:36.130973Z",{"id":333,"title":334,"url":335,"summary":336,"summary_zh":337,"content":9,"source_name":338,"source_url":335,"published_at":339,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":340,"score_detail":341,"sources":344,"tags":348,"primary_topic":351,"secondary_topics":352,"classification":354,"search_phrases":405,"slug":408,"view_count":22,"doi":409,"paper":410,"created_at":420},1721,"Climate-Smart Agriculture for Sustainable Food Security","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22301142","Climate change is creating serious challenges for agriculture and food security, particularly for rural and smallholder farming communities. Rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, droughts, floods, water scarcity, soil degradation and biodiversity loss can reduce agricultural productivity and affect rural livelihoods. Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) provides an integrated approach to address these challenges by improving agricultural productivity, strengthening resilience to climate change and promoting sustainable management of natural resources. This study examines the role of CSA in achieving sustainable food security from a global perspective. The study adopts a descriptive and analytical research design based on secondary data collected from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Bank, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), United Nations and other published sources. The study covers the period 2019–2025 and reviews major CSA practices, including conservation agriculture, water-smart agriculture, climate-resilient crop varieties, agroforestry, integrated crop-livestock systems and digital agriculture. The findings indicate that CSA can improve agricultural productivity, farmer income, climate resilience, nutritional security and resource conservation. However, limited climate finance, high technology costs, smallholder constraints, digital inequality, weak extension services and policy gaps continue to restrict adoption. The study recommends stronger financial support, affordable technologies, improved extension services and farmer-centred policies to promote inclusive CSA and strengthen sustainable food security.","气候变化正给农业和粮食安全带来严峻挑战，尤其对农村和小农社区影响深远。气温升高、降雨不规律、干旱、洪涝、水资源短缺、土壤退化和生物多样性丧失，均可能降低农业生产力，并影响农村生计。气候智能型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）提供了一种综合性应对方案，通过提升农业生产力、增强对气候变化的适应能力以及促进自然资源的可持续管理，来应对上述挑战。本研究从全球视角探讨了CSA在实现可持续粮食安全中的作用。研究采用描述性与分析性相结合的研究设计，基于从联合国粮食及农业组织（FAO）、世界银行、政府间气候变化专门委员会（IPCC）、联合国及其他公开来源收集的二手数据展开分析。研究覆盖2019—2025年期间，并梳理了主要的CSA实践，包括保护性农业、节水型农业、气候适应性作物品种、农林业、种养结合系统以及数字农业。研究结果表明，CSA能够提升农业生产力、增加农民收入、增强气候韧性、改善营养安全并促进资源保护。然而，气候融资有限、技术成本高昂、小农面临诸多制约、数字鸿沟、推广服务薄弱以及政策缺口，仍持续限制着CSA的推广应用。研究建议加强资金支持、推动技术可负担化、完善推广服务并制定以农民为中心的政策，以促进包容性CSA发展，进而强化可持续粮食安全。","International Journal for Research Trends in Social Science & Humanities.","2026-09-04T00:00:00Z",66,{"impact":17,"substance":234,"depth":235,"authority":21,"freshness":342,"relevant":22,"comment":343},2,"全球视角综述CSA实践与挑战，数据较新，但时效性低，适合作为背景参考。",[345,346],{"name":338,"url":335},{"name":338,"url":347},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22301141",[64,349,31,350],"农业韧性","小农",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[353],{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":355},{"candidates":356,"agricultural_evidence":60},[357,363,367,373,377,381,385,389,394,400],{"code":72,"score":19,"supported":60,"title":358,"abstract":359,"tags":362},[74],[360,74,361],"数字农业","digital agriculture",[],{"code":35,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":364,"abstract":365,"tags":366},[62],[64,62],[64],{"code":48,"score":21,"supported":60,"title":368,"abstract":369,"tags":372},[],[171,370,172,371,173,68],"气候适应","洪涝",[31],{"code":264,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":374,"abstract":375,"tags":376},[],[267,268],[],{"code":42,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":378,"abstract":379,"tags":380},[],[81,43],[],{"code":281,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":382,"abstract":383,"tags":384},[],[284],[],{"code":85,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":386,"abstract":387,"tags":388},[],[89],[],{"code":309,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":390,"abstract":391,"tags":393},[],[392],"水资源",[],{"code":395,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":396,"abstract":397,"tags":399},"H8",[],[398],"conservation agriculture",[],{"code":103,"score":86,"supported":60,"title":401,"abstract":402,"tags":404},[],[403],"数字鸿沟",[],[406,407],"气候智慧农业 农业韧性 粮食安全 小农","气候智慧农业 农业韧性","气候智慧农业农业韧性粮食安全小农-1721","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22301142",{"doi":409,"openalex_id":411,"authors":412,"venue":338,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":335,"card":415,"direction":124,"ingested_from":125},"W7208735871",[413],{"name":414,"orcid":9},"N. Thilagavathi",{"tldr":416,"method":417,"finding":418,"direction":122,"opportunity":419},"综述气候智慧农业（CSA）对可持续粮食安全的作用，分析其效益与推广障碍。","基于FAO、世界银行等二手数据，采用描述性和分析性研究设计，覆盖2019-202","CSA能提升生产力、韧性、营养与资源保护，但受资金、技术、小农限制等制约。","可研究数字农业如何降低CSA技术成本，或设计针对小农的普惠金融与政策机制以促进采纳。","2026-09-05T23:30:09.026027Z",{"id":422,"title":423,"url":424,"summary":425,"summary_zh":426,"content":9,"source_name":427,"source_url":424,"published_at":428,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":21,"is_selected":14,"score":429,"score_detail":430,"sources":432,"tags":434,"primary_topic":439,"secondary_topics":440,"classification":447,"search_phrases":471,"slug":474,"view_count":22,"doi":475,"paper":476,"created_at":489},5308,"Geopolitics and food security: A comprehensive review of emerging risks and responses","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.51200\u002Fjsffs.v2i2.7666","This review paper examines the relationship between geopolitics and food security through a Systematic Literature Review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. A total of 15 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2015 and 2026 were reviewed to identify emerging geopolitical risks and responses affecting global food systems. The study synthesizes literature on armed conflicts, trade restrictions, climate change, supply chain disruptions, energy market instability, and technological transformation in agriculture. The findings identified four major themes. First, geopolitical conflicts and protectionist trade policies significantly disrupt global food supply chains and increase food price volatility. Second, climate-related shock such as droughts, floods, and extreme weather events intensifies food insecurity, particularly in import-dependent and developing economies. Third, weaknesses in global logistics and energy dependence expose food systems to external shocks and market instability. Fourth, technological innovations, including smart farming, precision agriculture, and digital monitoring systems, play an increasingly important role in strengthening agricultural productivity, improving resource efficiency, and enhancing resilience against geopolitical and environmental uncertainties. The policy implications of this study include strengthening regional food reserves, diversifying import sources, investing in climate-resilient agriculture, promoting the adoption of smart farming technologies, and enhancing institutional cooperation between governments and international organizations. The relevance of smart farming is increasingly evident, as precision agriculture, Internet of Things (IoT)-based monitoring systems, and data-driven farming technologies play a critical role in improving productivity, reducing resource inefficiency, and enhancing food system resilience under geopolitical stress. The study contributes to a broader understanding of how geopolitical dynamics shape food security and provides recommendations for building sustainable, resilient, and technology-driven food systems in an increasingly uncertain global environment.","本文通过遵循系统评价与荟萃分析首选报告条目（Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses）框架的系统文献综述，考察地缘政治与粮食安全之间的关系。共 review 了2015年至2026年间发表的15篇同行评审期刊论文，以识别影响全球粮食系统的新兴地缘政治风险与应对措施。本研究综合了关于武装冲突、贸易限制、气候变化、供应链中断、能源市场不稳定以及农业技术转型的文献。研究结果识别出四大主题。第一，地缘政治冲突和保护主义贸易政策显著扰乱全球粮食供应链并加剧粮食价格波动。第二，干旱、洪水和极端天气事件等气候相关冲击加剧粮食不安全，尤其是在依赖进口的经济体和发展中经济体中。第三，全球物流的薄弱环节和能源依赖使粮食系统暴露于外部冲击和市场不稳定之中。第四，包括智慧农业、精准农业和数字监测系统在内的技术创新，在增强农业生产力、提高资源效率以及增强应对地缘政治和环境不确定性的韧性方面发挥着日益重要的作用。本研究的政策启示包括加强区域粮食储备、多元化进口来源、投资气候韧性农业、促进智慧农业技术的采用，以及加强政府与国际组织之间的制度合作。智慧农业的相关性日益明显，因为精准农业、基于物联网（IoT）的监测系统和数据驱动农业技术在提高生产力、减少资源低效以及增强地缘政治压力下粮食系统韧性方面发挥着关键作用。本研究有助于更广泛地理解地缘政治动态如何塑造粮食安全，并为在日益不确定的全球环境中构建可持续、有韧性且技术驱动的粮食系统提供建议。","Journal of Smart Farming and Food Security","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",77,{"impact":17,"substance":234,"depth":19,"authority":236,"freshness":78,"relevant":22,"comment":431},"系统综述梳理地缘政治与粮食安全风险，并强调智慧农业的韧性价值，具政策与产业参考意义，但属综述性论文，非突破性成果。",[433],{"name":427,"url":424},[435,436,64,437,438],"智慧农业","农业供应链","精准农业","地缘政治",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[441,442],{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"code":443,"slug":444,"name":445,"path":446,"parent_code":98},"I5","agricultural-iot","物联网传感与边缘计算","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-iot",{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":448},{"candidates":449,"agricultural_evidence":60},[450,454,460,464],{"code":35,"score":141,"supported":60,"title":451,"abstract":452,"tags":453},[62],[64,62],[64],{"code":72,"score":455,"supported":60,"title":456,"abstract":457,"tags":459},11,[],[435,437,458],"precision agriculture",[435,437],{"code":48,"score":78,"supported":60,"title":461,"abstract":462,"tags":463},[],[171,172,173],[],{"code":443,"score":78,"supported":60,"title":465,"abstract":466,"tags":470},[],[467,468,469],"物联网","internet of things","IoT",[],[472,473],"地缘政治 粮食安全","智慧农业 粮食系统韧性","地缘政治粮食安全-5308","10.51200\u002Fjsffs.v2i2.7666",{"doi":475,"openalex_id":477,"authors":478,"venue":427,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":424,"card":484,"direction":124,"ingested_from":125},"W7222902031",[479,481],{"name":480,"orcid":9},"Parameswaran Mahendran",{"name":482,"orcid":483},"Wong Sing Yun","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5776-8852",{"tldr":485,"method":486,"finding":487,"direction":124,"opportunity":488},"系统综述地缘政治风险对粮食安全的影响及应对，强调智慧农业的韧性作用。","按PRISMA框架系统综述2015-2026年15篇同行评议文献。","冲突、贸易限制、气候与能源冲击威胁粮食安全，智慧农业可提升韧性与效率。","可量化研究物联网与精准农业在地缘政治冲击下对粮食系统韧性的实证贡献。","2026-10-19T23:30:07.850994Z",{"id":491,"title":492,"url":493,"summary":494,"summary_zh":495,"content":9,"source_name":496,"source_url":493,"published_at":231,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":21,"is_selected":14,"score":497,"score_detail":498,"sources":500,"tags":502,"primary_topic":506,"secondary_topics":507,"classification":509,"search_phrases":530,"slug":533,"view_count":22,"doi":534,"paper":535,"created_at":558},5163,"Ecological indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem responses to climate change in agroecology and nature-based solutions: a scoping review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685","Climate change reshapes biodiversity patterns and ecosystem processes across scales. However, ecological indicators used to track these changes remain uneven in structure and application. This study maps and synthesizes indicators applied in agroecology and nature-based solutions (NbS) for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem responses under climate change. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering literature from 2003 to 2026. From a final dataset of 89 sources, data were extracted through a structured coding framework and synthesized using an Indicator–Scale–Response matrix and an Indicator Application Index. Findings show shared reliance on indicators such as species diversity, ecosystem productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services, and resilience. Differences emerge in how these indicators are applied. Agroecology prioritizes process-based and field-level measurements grounded in local ecological interactions, while NbS emphasizes standardized and scalable metrics linked to monitoring and reporting systems. Cross-scale integration remains uneven, particularly in connecting species-level responses with ecosystem and landscape indicators. Remote sensing and Essential Biodiversity Variables provide emerging pathways for linking scales, though field integration remains partial. Results point to fragmented indicator systems that limit coherent ecological assessment across management contexts. Strengthening alignment between field observations and scalable monitoring approaches could improve comparability and usability of ecological indicators for climate adaptation and ecosystem management in agricultural landscapes.","气候变化重塑了跨尺度的生物多样性模式与生态系统过程。然而，用于追踪这些变化的生态指标在结构和应用上仍不均衡。本研究梳理并综合了农业生态学与基于自然的解决方案（NbS）中用于评估气候变化下生物多样性与生态系统响应的指标。采用PRISMA-ScR指南开展范围综述，检索Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar，覆盖2003年至2026年的文献。从最终89篇文献构成的数据集中，通过结构化编码框架提取数据，并运用“指标—尺度—响应”矩阵和指标应用指数进行综合。研究结果表明，各领域共同依赖物种多样性、生态系统生产力、碳动态、生态系统服务和恢复力等指标，但在指标应用方式上存在差异。农业生态学侧重于基于过程和田块尺度的测量，根植于地方生态相互作用；而NbS强调与监测和报告体系相关联的标准化、可扩展的度量指标。跨尺度整合仍不均衡，尤其是在将物种层面响应与生态系统及景观指标相衔接方面。遥感与基本生物多样性变量（Essential Biodiversity Variables）为连接尺度提供了新兴路径，但野外观测的整合仍不充分。研究结果揭示出指标体系的碎片化，限制了跨管理情境下一致的生态评估。加强野外观测与可扩展监测方法之间的衔接，有望提升生态指标在农业景观气候适应与生态系统管理中的可比性和可用性。","Ecological Indicators",64,{"impact":140,"substance":17,"depth":235,"authority":236,"freshness":78,"relevant":22,"comment":499},"该综述系统梳理了农业生态学与NbS中生物多样性及生态系统响应的指标，方法规范、结论有参考价值，但属学术综述，产业与政策影响有限，适合作为专业资讯而非每日精选头条。",[501],{"name":496,"url":493},[171,81,503,504,505],"农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案","生态指标",{"code":42,"slug":43,"name":44,"path":45,"parent_code":46},[508],{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":510},{"candidates":511,"agricultural_evidence":60},[512,519,523],{"code":42,"score":513,"supported":60,"title":514,"abstract":516,"tags":518},27,[43,515],"agroecology",[81,82,517,43,515],"生态系统服务",[503,81],{"code":48,"score":17,"supported":60,"title":520,"abstract":521,"tags":522},[173],[171,370,173],[171],{"code":524,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":525,"abstract":526,"tags":529},"I3",[],[527,528],"遥感","remote sensing",[],[531,532],"基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学 生物多样性 气候变化","基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案农业生态学生物多样性气候变化-5163","10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685",{"doi":534,"openalex_id":536,"authors":537,"venue":496,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":493,"card":552,"direction":557,"ingested_from":125},"W7222588017",[538,541,544,547,549],{"name":539,"orcid":540},"Eliakira Kisetu Nassary","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7327-4366",{"name":542,"orcid":543},"Mawazo Jamson Shitindi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5579-902X",{"name":545,"orcid":546},"Aneth Japhet Magubika","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8910-1953",{"name":548,"orcid":9},"Esta Alfred Mhagama",{"name":550,"orcid":551},"Newton Lwiyiso Kilasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4721-7691",{"tldr":553,"method":554,"finding":555,"direction":122,"opportunity":556},"综述农业生态与NbS中生物多样性和生态系统气候响应指标的应用差异。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，检索2003-2026年89篇文献，构建指标-尺度","两类领域指标依赖相似但应用分化，跨尺度整合不足，指标系统碎片化。","可研究田间观测与遥感EBV衔接的跨尺度指标框架，提升农业景观气候适应评估可比性。","农业遥感与作物表型","2026-10-17T23:30:28.181936Z",{"id":560,"title":561,"url":562,"summary":563,"summary_zh":564,"content":9,"source_name":565,"source_url":562,"published_at":566,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":21,"is_selected":14,"score":567,"score_detail":568,"sources":570,"tags":572,"primary_topic":578,"secondary_topics":579,"classification":581,"search_phrases":596,"slug":599,"view_count":117,"doi":600,"paper":601,"created_at":621},5101,"Advances in Cerrado and tropical grassland plant biology – diversity, functioning, resilience and conservation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331","Abstract Background Tropical grasslands and savannas are ancient, highly diverse ecosystems that support important ecological processes, ecosystem services and human livelihoods, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural expansion, altered fire regimes, invasive species and climate change. The Cerrado, the largest savanna-dominated region in the Neotropics, exemplifies both the exceptional biological diversity and vulnerability of tropical open ecosystems. Despite major advances in plant ecology and evolution, important gaps remain in understanding how plants and plant communities respond to environmental change and disturbance. Scope We review recent advances in plant biology in the Cerrado and other tropical grasslands, covering their evolution, vegetation patterns, plant–animal interactions, functional ecology, responses to fire and environmental change, and restoration and conservation. We consider processes from plant traits and physiological responses to community and ecosystem dynamics, examining how environmental and biotic factors shape the diversity, functioning and resilience of tropical grassy ecosystems. Conclusions Recent advances reinforce the value of tropical grasslands as model systems for advancing fundamental plant science while providing knowledge relevant to their conservation and restoration. Future research should better integrate -omics, functional and evolutionary approaches with long-term monitoring, remote sensing and predictive modelling to understand plant responses to climate change, land-use intensification and changing disturbance regimes. Plant research can also contribute to ecosystem restoration, sustainable land management and climate adaptation. Greater recognition of native plant diversity as a resource for sustainable bioeconomies and local livelihoods can further connect biodiversity conservation with societal needs.","摘要 背景 热带草原和稀树草原是古老且高度多样的生态系统，支撑着重要的生态过程、生态系统服务与人类生计，然而它们正日益受到农业扩张、火 regime 改变、入侵物种和气候变化的威胁。塞拉多（Cerrado）是新热带地区最大的以稀树草原为主的区域，集中体现了热带开放生态系统卓越的生物多样性与脆弱性。尽管植物生态学和进化研究已取得重大进展，但在理解植物及植物群落如何响应环境变化和干扰方面仍存在重要空白。 范围 我们综述了塞拉多及其他热带草原植物生物学的最新进展，涵盖其进化、植被格局、植物–动物相互作用、功能生态学、对火和环境变化的响应，以及恢复与保护。我们考察了从植物性状和生理响应到群落和生态系统动态的过程，审视环境和生物因素如何塑造热带草类生态系统的多样性、功能和恢复力。 结论 最新进展强化了热带草原作为推进基础植物科学模型系统的价值，同时提供了与其保护和恢复相关的知识。未来研究应更好地整合组学、功能和进化方法，与长期监测、遥感和预测建模相结合，以理解植物对气候变化、土地利用集约化和干扰 regime 变化的响应。植物研究还可为生态系统恢复、可持续土地管理和气候适应作出贡献。进一步认识本土植物多样性作为可持续生物经济和当地生计资源的价值，可将生物多样性保护与社会需求更紧密地联系起来。","Annals of Botany","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":20,"substance":234,"depth":17,"authority":59,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":569},"核心期刊综述，系统梳理热带草原植物多样性、功能与保护研究进展，学术价值高但与国内农业信息化直接关联有限。",[571],{"name":565,"url":562},[573,574,575,576,577],"生态保护","热带草原","稀树草原","植物多样性","退化草地恢复",{"code":42,"slug":43,"name":44,"path":45,"parent_code":46},[580],{"code":48,"slug":49,"name":50,"path":51,"parent_code":46},{"status":53,"locked":14,"version":54,"method":55,"evidence":582},{"candidates":583,"agricultural_evidence":60},[584,588,592],{"code":42,"score":21,"supported":60,"title":585,"abstract":586,"tags":587},[],[81,517,43],[573],{"code":48,"score":78,"supported":60,"title":589,"abstract":590,"tags":591},[],[171,370,173],[],{"code":524,"score":128,"supported":60,"title":593,"abstract":594,"tags":595},[],[527,528],[],[597,598],"Cerrado 稀树草原 植物生物学","热带草原 植物多样性 保护","Cerrado稀树草原植物生物学-5101","10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331",{"doi":600,"openalex_id":602,"authors":603,"venue":565,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":9,"card":616,"direction":557,"ingested_from":125},"W7222330485",[604,607,610,613],{"name":605,"orcid":606},"Robert G. Miller","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5798-4552",{"name":608,"orcid":609},"Augusto César Franco","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0869-5989",{"name":611,"orcid":612},"Cássia Beatriz Rodrigues Munhoz","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7990-6715",{"name":614,"orcid":615},"Marcelo Fragomeni Simon","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5732-1716",{"tldr":617,"method":618,"finding":619,"direction":557,"opportunity":620},"综述塞拉多及热带草原植物生物学进展，涵盖多样性、功能、恢复力与保护。","文献综述，整合组学、功能与进化方法及长期监测、遥感、预测模型。","热带草原是基础植物科学模型系统，需整合多手段理解植物对环境变化的响应。","将遥感与预测模型用于热带草原植物功能性状监测，填补长期动态与恢复力评估空白。","2026-10-16T23:30:31.368451Z"]