[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1119":3,"related-1119":62},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":8,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":55,"slug":58,"view_count":59,"doi":60,"paper":8,"created_at":61},1119,"From weather reliance to digital empowerment: the role of the digital economy in enhancing agricultural industry resilience","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1827043\u002Ffull","Jin Wang 发表论文。基于2011—2022年中国30个省份的面板数据,实证考察数字经济对农业产业韧性(AIR)的影响。研究发现:数字经济显著增强了农业产业韧性,但呈现明显的非线性关系——随着数字经济发展水平提升,边际赋能效应逐渐减弱,符合典型技术扩散模式;机制分析揭示数字经济通过促进农业技术创新、加速数字化转型、提高生产效率三条路径增强AIR;异质性分析表明赋能效应在非粮食主产区、农业现代化水平较低地区、人口老龄化程度较高地区更为显著。本研究为数字技术-农业韧性复杂非线性关系提供实证证据。",null,"## Abstract\n\n**Introduction:**\n\nTraditional agriculture is highly dependent on climatic conditions, making its output particularly sensitive to climate variability. The uncertainties associated with climate change pose ongoing challenges to agricultural industry resilience (AIR). In this context, the development of the digital economy is facilitating a shift from climate-dependent production to digitally empowered agriculture.\n\n**Methods:**\n\nThis study empirically examines the impact of the digital economy on AIR using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces over the period 2011–2022.\n\n**Results:**\n\nThe results indicate that the digital economy significantly enhances AIR, with a pronounced nonlinear relationship: as the level of digital economy development increases, its marginal empowering effect gradually diminishes, consistent with the typical pattern of technology diffusion. Mechanism analysis reveals that the digital economy strengthens AIR through three main pathways: promoting agricultural technological innovation, accelerating digital transformation, and improving production efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis further shows that the empowering effect of the digital economy is more pronounced in non-major grain-producing regions, areas with lower levels of agricultural modernization, and regions with higher degrees of population aging. This highlights the role of digital development in addressing structural weaknesses in traditional agriculture and alleviating resource constraints.\n\n**Discussion:**\n\nThis study provides empirical evidence on the complex nonlinear relationship between digital technologies and agricultural resilience, offering theoretical insights and practical guidance for policymakers to implement targeted digital strategies.\n\n## 1 Introduction\n\nIn the context of intensifying climate change, ecological degradation, and rising global economic uncertainty, the sustainability of agricultural systems has become a critical issue for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Agriculture not only serves as a fundamental pillar of food security and economic development but also plays a crucial role in ecosystem conservation and regional coordinated development (; ). Under the combined influence of multiple external shocks—such as climate variability, geopolitical conflicts, and economic fluctuations—agricultural production systems are facing heightened uncertainty, posing severe challenges to their stability, adaptability, and resilience (; ). Against this backdrop, enhancing AIR and promoting the green, intelligent, and sustainable transformation of agriculture has emerged as a key research agenda.\n\nTraditional agricultural production is highly dependent on favorable climatic conditions. Disasters such as droughts, floods, and extreme temperatures directly affect the stability of agricultural outputs. AIR is a critical metric that captures the capacity of agricultural systems to withstand shocks, maintain core functions, and adapt structurally under complex and uncertain environments (; ). Unlike metrics focusing solely on output or productivity, resilience emphasizes system-level, dynamic, and long-term perspectives, reflecting the ability of agricultural systems to absorb shocks, recover, and regenerate. AIR encompasses multiple dimensions, including stability and carrying capacity, adaptive recovery capability, and innovation support capability. In particular, in developing countries or major agricultural nations, enhancing AIR is fundamental for ensuring food security, narrowing urban–rural disparities, promoting rural revitalization, and building a modern agricultural system.\n\nThe rapid development of the digital economy presents new opportunities for the sustainable transformation of agricultural systems (). Digital technologies have increasingly permeated all stages of agricultural production, management, distribution, and consumption, driving agriculture toward greater intelligence, precision, and interconnectedness. In China, the “Digital Agriculture and Rural Development Plan (2019–2025)” explicitly emphasizes digitalization as a key driver of agricultural and rural modernization. In this context, the digital economy not only reshapes agricultural value chains but also significantly improves resource allocation efficiency and organizational practices (). This transformation reflects a profound shift in production paradigms, from weather-dependent and passive risk management to digitally empowered, proactive control. However, while the digital economy can enhance efficiency and resilience, it may also exacerbate structural disparities due to uneven regional development and unequal resource access, resulting in a “digital divide.” This underscores a critical challenge: moving beyond mere infrastructure expansion toward substantive empowerment, whereby digital technologies genuinely enhance agricultural industrial resilience. Therefore, a systematic assessment of the pathways and boundary conditions through which the digital economy impacts agricultural systems is necessary.\n\nBased on this context, this study evaluates agricultural system sustainability from the perspective of AIR. Using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces between 2011 and 2022, it systematically analyses the effects of the digital economy on agricultural sustainability and its underlying mechanisms. Specifically, the study first identifies the overall effect of the digital economy, then uncovers the internal pathways through technological innovation, digital transformation, and productivity enhancement, thereby illustrating the transition from weather-dependent to digitally empowered agriculture. Moreover, threshold models are employed to examine nonlinear effects across different development stages, while regional and structural heterogeneity are considered to investigate contextual variations in the digital economy’s impact.\n\nThe main contributions of this study can be summarized in three aspects. First, from the perspective of agricultural system sustainability, we reconstruct the AIR indicator framework, clearly defining three key dimensions: stability and carrying capacity, adaptive recovery capability, and innovation support capacity. This extends the analytical scope and theoretical boundaries of existing research, providing a more systematic and comprehensive tool to measure the overall resilience of agricultural systems under complex and uncertain environments. Second, the study reveals the mechanisms through which the digital economy enhances AIR via three pathways: technological innovation, digital transformation, and improvements in production efficiency. Empirically, we systematically identify the effects of these mechanisms across regions and development stages. Theoretically, by integrating complex systems theory with innovation diffusion theory, we illustrate how technological innovation strengthens system adaptability and recovery by enhancing information acquisition and decision-making capabilities, how digital transformation improves agricultural resilience through optimized organizational structures and resource allocation, and how increased production efficiency reinforces the system’s stability and carrying capacity. This combined theoretical and empirical analysis not only clarifies the pathways through which the digital economy enhances AIR but also provides a logical basis for understanding its heterogeneous effects across different contexts. Third, with regard to nonlinearity and heterogeneity, the study conducts differentiated analyses based on agricultural production function, development stage, and factor endowment differences. Specifically, it examines the effects of the digital economy across major versus non-major grain-producing regions, levels of agricultural modernization, and degrees of population aging. This allows us to identify diversified pathways through which the digital economy influences AIR, offering both theoretical grounding and empirical evidence to support context-specific digital empowerment strategies.\n\nThe remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the literature review; Section 3 develops the theoretical framework and hypothesis development; Section 4 outlines the research design; Section 5 reports the empirical results and discussion; and the final section provides the conclusions, policy recommendations and study limitations.\n\n## 2 Literature review\n\nResearch on AIR has primarily focused on its conceptual definition, the construction of evaluation indicator systems, analysis of influencing factors, and pathways for enhancement.\n\nIn terms of conceptual studies of AIR, the definition has evolved from a single-dimensional perspective to a multidimensional one. Early studies mainly emphasized the resistance capacity of agricultural systems. For example, argued that agricultural resilience reflects the system’s ability to maintain stable operation when facing shocks. further conceptualized resilience as the ability to absorb external shocks and return to a normal state, highlighting that the system not only needs to withstand stress but also possesses rapid recovery characteristics. Building on this, scholars have further emphasized both the system’s capacity to endure shocks and the efficiency of post-shock recovery, suggesting that resilience encompasses not only the ability to resist pressure but also the speed and extent of recovery (). As research perspectives have expanded, some scholars have extended the analytical scope to cover the entire agricultural value chain, including production, processing, distribution, and consumption, arguing that agricultural value chain resilience represents the integrated capability of all segments to maintain core functions, achieve dynamic restoration, and pursue new development pathways under uncertain shocks (). Overall, despite differences in emphasis across studies, a growing consensus has emerged that agricultural value chain resilience is a multidimensional and composite concept encompassing shock resistance, recovery capacity, and dynamic adaptive capability.\n\nRegarding the influencing factors of agricultural value chain resilience, existing studies have identified key drivers from multiple perspectives. From the perspective of factor inputs, the level of human capital accumulation, the intensity of investment in scientific research and innovation, and the adequacy of infrastructure such as farmland irrigation and storage and logistics facilities constitute the fundamental support conditions for enhancing resilience (; ). From the perspective of industrial organization, the degree of coordination within agricultural industrial alliances and the smoothness of benefit linkage mechanisms among different segments of the value chain significantly affect the overall risk resistance of the chain (). From the perspective of the external environment, the continuity and stability of institutional provision, the extent of market-oriented reforms, and the soundness of risk warning and emergency management systems collectively shape the external conditions for agricultural value chain resilience (). Moreover, some studies have examined the “stress-testing” effects of natural disasters and market fluctuations on agricultural value chain resilience, providing empirical insights into its performance under real-world shocks (). Building on this, with the accelerated penetration of digital technologies into the agricultural and rural sectors, the digital economy has gradually emerged as an important new factor influencing agricultural resilience. Existing studies have explored the mechanisms through which the digital economy affects agricultural systems from various angles. using a difference-in-differences model, found that the development of the digital economy significantly enhances food system resilience. () argued that the digital economy strengthens agricultural systems’ ability to withstand external shocks by optimizing resource and factor allocation. Furthermore, indicates that the digital economy exerts a significant positive effect on agricultural economic resilience, with industrial upgrading serving as an important transmission pathway. taking a regional heterogeneity perspective, found that the promoting effect of digital technologies on agricultural resilience varies across regions, being particularly pronounced in eastern China.\n\nA systematic review of the existing literature indicates that significant progress has been made in defining the concept of agricultural value chain resilience, constructing measurement systems, analyzing influencing factors, and exploring enhancement pathways, thereby laying a solid foundation for further research. However, there are still several areas that require further development: First, in terms of the measurement system, although previous studies have attempted to conduct quantitative analyses of agricultural value chain resilience from a multidimensional perspective, there remain issues related to the scattered selection of indicators and insufficient theoretical integration. There is a lack of a unified and highly explanatory analytical framework across studies, which to some extent affects the comparability and stability of measurement results. Second, regarding the mechanisms, existing literature mainly focuses on empirical relationship testing and lacks systematic integration of the underlying transmission paths that influence agricultural resilience, especially in key processes such as technological innovation, information flow and feedback regulation mechanisms, and improvements in resource allocation efficiency. The theoretical explanations in these areas still require further refinement. Third, in terms of research methodology, most studies are based on linear analytical frameworks and give insufficient attention to the stage-specific characteristics, nonlinear relationships, and heterogeneity under different agricultural production conditions or regional development levels. As a result, this limits the depth of interpretation of conclusions and the policy implications derived from them.\n\nBased on the existing research, this study aims to further integrate and expand the analytical framework of agricultural value chain resilience from the perspective of agricultural system sustainability. By combining nonlinear analysis and mechanism testing methods, it systematically explores the pathways and mechanisms through which the digital economy empowers agricultural resilience, with the aim of providing valuable insights to complement related research.\n\n## 3 Theoretical analysis and hypothesis development\n\n### 3.1 Digital economy and AIR\n\nAIR reflects the overall capacity of agricultural systems to withstand disturbances, adapt, and sustain development in the face of external shocks. Its formation relies on the efficiency of internal resource allocation, the effectiveness of information transmission mechanisms, and the flexibility of organizational structures (). In traditional agricultural systems, production decisions heavily depend on natural conditions and experiential judgment, while information acquisition is costly and often significantly asymmetric, making the system prone to delayed responses and rigid adjustments when facing climate variability, market shocks, or policy changes ().\n\nDigital economy, through the capitalization of data as a production factor and the pervasive penetration of digital technologies, is reshaping the operational paradigm of agricultural systems and offering new pathways to enhance agricultural sustainability (). In the dimension of resistance, platform economies improve market efficiency and information transparency in agricultural factor markets (; ), optimize spatiotemporal resource allocation, and bolster the system’s capacity for rapid response to unexpected events (). In the adaptation dimension, digital tools facilitate sharing and organizational learning among agricultural stakeholders, strengthening dynamic adjustment and feedback mechanisms within the system (; ). In the transformation dimension, digitally enabled ecosystems foster new organizational forms and industrial models that drive the intelligent and green transformation of agricultural value chains, expanding the system’s capacity for self-evolution amid complex environments (; ). This constructs a closed-loop perceive–feedback–transform capability within agricultural systems, making the digital economy a potential cornerstone of sustainability support. In China, agricultural digitization is transitioning from infrastructure to deep integration, while the risk of digital divide still exists, the digital economy as a whole is more likely to show the effect of elastic bridge. Through information symmetry, efficiency improvement and innovation mode, the coordination and change flexibility of the whole system are enhanced.\n\nFrom the perspective of system evolution, the impact of the digital economy on agricultural sustainability may not follow a linear upward trajectory. In the early stages of development, enabling investments such as the construction of digital infrastructure and the introduction of platforms can rapidly enhance the system’s capacity for resource integration and risk resistance. However, at more advanced stages, as the technological dividends become saturated and marginal returns diminish, the system’s ability to absorb additional digital inputs becomes a key determinant of the effectiveness of sustainable transformation. This dynamic evolutionary pattern suggests that the digital economy’s impact on agricultural system sustainability exhibits clear stage-dependent and threshold characteristics.\n\nBased on this, this article proposes the core hypothesis:\n\n> _H1_: The development of the digital economy positively enhances AIR, and this effect exhibits nonlinear threshold characteristics.\n\n### 3.2 Mediating pathways of digital economy on AIR\n\nThis study uses the Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory as a theoretical foundation to examine the transmission pathways through which the digital economy affects agricultural industry resilience. CAS theory posits that a system’s resilience in the face of external disturbances stems from three intrinsic mechanisms: ① Learning and innovation mechanism, whereby the system adapts to environmental changes through variation, selection, and retention. ② Information flow and feedback regulation mechanism, where the system achieves dynamic coordination through real-time information exchange. ③ Resource reallocation and efficiency mechanism, where the system buffers shocks through flexible resource deployment (). The agricultural industry, as a typical CAS unit, exhibits resilience in terms of the continuous production capacity of production units, the coordination and reconfiguration ability of the industrial chain, and the overall stability and recovery capacity of regional agricultural systems when facing environmental or market shocks (). The digital economy, with data as a core production factor, reduces information processing and coordination costs and can specifically enhance the above three resilience mechanisms, transmitting its impact on agricultural industry resilience through three mediating pathways: agricultural technological innovation, agricultural digital transformation, and improvement in agricultural production efficiency.\n\nFirst, the mediating pathway of agricultural technological innovation. According to CAS theory, the system’s learning and innovation mechanism is the long-term adaptive basis for resilience: a system needs to continuously update its technologies and organizational forms to cope with unpredictable shocks (). In traditional agricultural systems, technological innovation is constrained by regional segmentation, slow accumulation of experience, and high knowledge diffusion ","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-06-02T01:00:00Z","论文",10,false,73,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":20,"comment":21},18,22,14,1,"论文实证数字经济对农业韧性的影响，数据详实，结论有政策参考价值，但时效性较低。",[23],{"name":10,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"数字经济","30省面板","农业产业韧性","非线性","技术扩散",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"J2","modernization","农业强国与现代化","\u002Ftopic\u002Fpolicy\u002Fmodernization","J",[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,50],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":49},3,true,[],[48],"农业现代化",[],{"code":51,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":52,"abstract":53,"tags":54},"I6",[],[],[25],[56,57],"农业产业韧性 技术扩散 数字经济 30省面板","农业产业韧性 技术扩散","农业产业韧性技术扩散数字经济30省面板-1119",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1827043\u002Ffull","2026-08-30T00:11:11.502161Z",{"total":63,"page":20,"page_size":63,"items":64},6,[65,110,165,217,265,302],{"id":66,"title":67,"url":68,"summary":69,"summary_zh":8,"content":70,"source_name":71,"source_url":8,"published_at":72,"category":73,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":74,"score_detail":75,"sources":80,"tags":82,"primary_topic":87,"secondary_topics":88,"classification":89,"search_phrases":105,"slug":108,"view_count":20,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":109},5259,"以\"三个一起抓\"推进农业强国建设——学习中央关于\"三农\"工作重要论述","https:\u002F\u002Fpinglun.youth.cn\u002Fll\u002F202610\u002Ft20261018_16919967.htm","评论文章围绕\"生产与生态一起抓、增产与增收一起抓、当前与长远一起抓\"展开论述,指出增产带来收成增加却难保证经济效益,要从产业链延伸、利益联结机制、品牌培育等方面破解\"增产—降价—减收\"恶性循环,推动农业发展目标从\"保供给\"为主向\"保供给、促增收\"兼容转变。","ơա֡ճɵӣȴܱ֤Чߡһ棬ũƷرǴʳݲƷ۸Խϵͣ۸仯Ӱޣһӣ۸׻䣬ߡһ棬ũҵڹ̶ֲֳһڼ۸ʹ롰ۡաĶѭˣͨνӡṹŻƷϵͳ԰ţʵֶΣգĿģлͳһ뼤ݡ\n\nգũԵĹؼһץũҵˣǹᴩǰСȫֵʵֵȫ̡Ҫӡֻ֡ת򡰹Ҳӡת򡰱աӡתг+еס˫ũũ룻ھ帻ҵDZʵԪֵũľӪ룻ǿְҵѵũ񹤾ҵֺͷ紴ҵ֧֣ũĹ룻淶ũԴ̻ãũIJƲ룻ũҵֱ֧ߣչͼ徭ãũת롣\n\nղȻͳһġƽһìܵصڣһDzҵ졣ںѻø߶棬ͨҵ죬ǿӹƷӪũںϣչũҵ̬ĻֵũҵۺЧ棬ʵֵּũҵũȺ塣ơҪũũƣͨ˾+ũ+ũũҵȷʽСũִũҵչũҵֵ档ũҵ֧ߡҪǿ۸񡢲յߵ֧Эͬȫũ汣ϻƣΪũҵṩ֧֡","中国青年网评论频道(2026-10-18)","2026-10-18T00:00:00Z","报道",60,{"impact":18,"substance":76,"depth":77,"authority":78,"freshness":77,"relevant":20,"comment":79},8,9,12,"央媒评论频道对中央三农论述的学习阐释，属政策宣传性评论，缺乏新政策条款与数据增量，时效性强但信息价值有限，不建议进入每日精选。",[81],{"name":71,"url":68},[83,84,85,86],"农民增收","农业强国","三农工作","农业支持政策",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":90},{"candidates":91,"agricultural_evidence":45},[92,96,101],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":93,"abstract":94,"tags":95},[84],[],[85,84],{"code":97,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":98,"abstract":99,"tags":100},"G6",[],[],[83],{"code":35,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":102,"abstract":103,"tags":104},[],[],[85],[106,107],"农业支持政策 三农工作 农业强国 农民增收","农业支持政策 三农工作","农业支持政策三农工作农业强国农民增收-5259","2026-10-19T00:07:32.035255Z",{"id":111,"title":112,"url":113,"summary":114,"summary_zh":8,"content":115,"source_name":116,"source_url":8,"published_at":117,"category":118,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":45,"score":119,"score_detail":120,"sources":124,"tags":126,"primary_topic":133,"secondary_topics":134,"classification":135,"search_phrases":159,"slug":162,"view_count":163,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":164},5204,"国新办发布会聚焦\"十五五\"\"三农\"工作:农业农村部解读夯实科技自立自强","http:\u002F\u002Fjournal.crnews.net\u002Fncgztxcs\u002F2026\u002Fdsbq\u002Ftbgz\u002F979927_20261014022653.html","农业农村部副部长张柱在国新办发布会上介绍,《加快农业农村现代化\"十五五\"规划》明确15项主要指标,\"十五五\"期间将夯实种植养殖等11个重点领域基础研究,实施\"百千万\"农业科技企业培育工程,推动人工智能+农业、生物制造等行动。","当前，新一轮科技革命和产业变革正在加速演进，科技成为农业农村现代化的关键变量。麦尔丹·木盖提表示，下一步将紧盯高水平农业科技自立自强目标，统筹推动前端关键技术攻关、中端高效集成转化、后端适用技术推广，以新技术新装备改造提升现代农业，前瞻布局和培育农业领域新兴产业和未来产业，加快发展农业新质生产力。\n\n首先要优化创新布局，夯实基础研究底座。战略性、前瞻性、体系化布局农业基础研究，聚焦种植养殖、农产品加工等11个重点领域，统筹推进原始创新和关键核心技术攻关，为现代农业技术进步提供“源头活水”。强化创新条件能力建设，以人工智能引领科研范式变革，前瞻布局智能设计育种、生境模拟试验等科研基础设施，推进智能农机装备、生物合成等中试验证平台建设，筑牢农业科技创新根基。其次要建强科技力量，提升体系化攻关能力。统筹推进国家农业科技战略力量建设，充分发挥新型举国体制优势，引导国家实验室、农业科研机构、高水平大学等聚焦主责主业，既适度竞争，又要分工协作，强化有组织科技攻关，避免低水平重复、同质化布局。农业科技领军企业是重要的科技战略力量，我们将实施好“百千万”农业科技企业培育工程，持续培育百家龙头型、千家高速成长型和万家潜力型的农业科技企业，支持企业更多承担产业急需的科技攻关任务，发挥科技创新主体作用。第三是推动科产融合，畅通科技成果转化渠道。农业科技成果最终要落到田间地头。我们将充分发挥基层农技推广体系、现代农业产业技术体系等作用，引导科研院所、高校、企业加强科技服务，探索科技特派员、科技小院等多种服务方式，实施农机装备高质量发展、农业生物制造提升、“人工智能+”农业等行动，加快新技术新产品新场景大规模应用，让农业科技成果真正服务产业、惠及农民，转化为现实生产力。\n\n全面推进乡村振兴，必须用好改革这一法宝。“‘十五五’时期，农村改革的主线仍然是处理好农民和土地的关系。”陈邦勋介绍，将以保障农民权益、增进农民福祉为出发点和落脚点，把准方向原则、守牢底线红线，把农村改革向纵深推进。“十五五”期间，绝大多数农户第二轮土地承包到期，将扎实推进第二轮土地承包到期后再延长30年试点，坚持“大稳定、小调整”，确保绝大多数农户原有承包地继续保持稳定，指导各地因地制宜妥善处置部分农户的合理诉求。在加强宅基地规范管理方面，持续聚焦“保障居住、管住乱建、盘活闲置”，推动保障农村村民住宅建设合理用地，指导各地强化宅基地审批管理，严守法律政策底线红线。充分尊重农民意愿，指导各地通过出租、入股、合作等方式，依法依规盘活利用闲置农房。\n\n在集体产权制度改革方面，重点是确权赋权活权，指导各地加快构建产权明晰、分配合理的农村集体经济组织运行机制，推进农村产权交易市场规范化建设，盘活集体资产资源，因地制宜稳健发展新型农村集体经济。在经营体系建设方面，继续坚持“宜大则大、宜小则小”，培育壮大新型农业经营主体，完善便捷高效的农业社会化服务体系，建立健全支撑产业发展、带动农民增收的现代农业经营体系。","中国农村网\u002F国新办(2026-10-14)","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z","政策",89,{"impact":121,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":122,"freshness":63,"relevant":20,"comment":123},28,15,"国新办发布会系统阐述“十五五”农业科技与农村改革部署，政策层级高、条款信息实，值得进入每日精选。",[125],{"name":116,"url":113},[127,128,129,130,131,132],"十五五","智慧农业","农业新质生产力","农村改革","农业科技","土地承包",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":136},{"candidates":137,"agricultural_evidence":45},[138,144,149,154],{"code":31,"score":139,"supported":45,"title":140,"abstract":141,"tags":143},4,[],[142],"农业农村现代化",[129],{"code":145,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":146,"abstract":147,"tags":148},"G5",[],[],[130],{"code":150,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":151,"abstract":152,"tags":153},"I1",[],[],[128],{"code":155,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":156,"abstract":157,"tags":158},"J1",[],[],[127],[160,161],"农业农村部 十五五 农业科技自立自强","第二轮土地承包 再延长30年 试点","农业农村部十五五农业科技自立自强-5204",0,"2026-10-18T00:05:13.775043Z",{"id":166,"title":167,"url":168,"summary":169,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":170,"source_url":8,"published_at":8,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":171,"score_detail":172,"sources":174,"tags":176,"primary_topic":181,"secondary_topics":182,"classification":183,"search_phrases":203,"slug":206,"view_count":44,"doi":8,"paper":207,"created_at":216},4405,"数字化赋能农业农村现代化的逻辑机理与实证研究","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F172930.html","徐卓顺、任鹏基于 2014-2024 年中国省际面板数据,构建数字化与农业农村现代化评价指标体系,结合主成分分析法提取数字化发展基础、创新能力、人力资本三大核心因子,运用 SDM 模型实证检验发现数字化对农业农村现代化的直接效应、间接效应及总效应均显著为正,存在明显的省际空间反馈效应;创新能力助推作用最强、基础设施建设水平次之;东部赋能优势突出、西部存在负向空间外溢。","吉林省社会科学院软科学所 吉林省科学技术信息研究所《吉林大学社会科学学报》2026 年第 04 期",74,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":59,"relevant":20,"comment":173},"基于2014-2024省际面板数据的实证研究，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，但属学术论文且时效性偏弱，适合主题聚合而非每日精选。",[175],{"name":170,"url":168},[177,142,178,179,180],"数字乡村","空间溢出","数字化转型","省级面板数据",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":184},{"candidates":185,"agricultural_evidence":45},[186,190,194,199],{"code":31,"score":78,"supported":45,"title":187,"abstract":188,"tags":189},[142],[142],[142],{"code":150,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":191,"abstract":192,"tags":193},[],[],[179],{"code":195,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":196,"abstract":197,"tags":198},"I4",[],[],[178],{"code":51,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":200,"abstract":201,"tags":202},[],[],[177],[204,205],"徐卓顺 任鹏 数字化 农业农村现代化","吉林大学社会科学学报 数字化 空间溢出","徐卓顺任鹏数字化农业农村现代化-4405",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":208,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":163,"oa_url":8,"card":209,"direction":213,"ingested_from":215},[],{"tldr":210,"method":211,"finding":212,"direction":213,"opportunity":214},"基于省际面板数据实证检验数字化对农业农村现代化的空间效应与赋能机制。","2014-2024年省际面板数据，主成分分析提取因子，SDM空间杜宾模型。","数字化直接、间接与总效应均显著为正，创新能力助推最强，东部优势突出、西部负向外溢。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可深入探究西部负向空间外溢的成因，并检验数字鸿沟与人力资本门槛的非线性调节机制。","agent","2026-10-08T00:07:47.101032Z",{"id":218,"title":219,"url":220,"summary":221,"summary_zh":8,"content":222,"source_name":223,"source_url":8,"published_at":224,"category":118,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":225,"score_detail":226,"sources":230,"tags":232,"primary_topic":237,"secondary_topics":238,"classification":239,"search_phrases":260,"slug":263,"view_count":139,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":264},3690,"江苏印发十五五农业农村现代化规划","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.toutiao.com\u002Farticle\u002F7688889842024989193\u002F","江苏省政府办公厅近日印发《江苏省十五五农业农村现代化规划》，设置16项主要指标，其中粮食综合生产能力760亿斤以上为约束性指标。部署7项重点任务和耕地质量提升、设施农业现代化提升、人工智能+农业141行动、宜居宜业和美乡村示范建设、新农人队伍培育等重大工程。","## 江苏印发“十五五”农业农村现代化规划\n\n2026-09-24 08:19·[金台资讯](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.toutiao.com\u002Fc\u002Fuser\u002Ftoken\u002FMS4wLjABAAAAL8m7IqT5eR3-VgZjzlMhg66-z57FyRmydYIImMLAsQ4\u002F?source=tuwen_detail)\n\n据《新华日报》报道，近日，江苏省政府办公厅印发《江苏省“十五五”农业农村现代化规划》，立足省情农情，对今后五年“三农”工作作出系统谋划和战略部署，明确了“十五五”时期加快农业农村现代化的思路目标、重点任务和政策措施，着力推进农业现代化走在前、高水平建设农业强省。\n\n《规划》强调，坚持农业农村优先发展，坚持城乡融合发展，锚定高水平建设农业强省目标，深入学习运用“千万工程”经验，一体推进农业现代化和农村现代化，统筹发展科技农业、绿色农业、质量农业、品牌农业。\n\n《规划》提出，到2030年，乡村全面振兴取得显著成效，农业农村现代化取得重大进展，粮食等重要农产品供给保障能力持续增强，农业质量效益和竞争力不断提高，农民收入持续较快增长，宜居宜业和美乡村加快建设，城乡融合发展实现新突破。围绕农业农村高质量发展设置16项主要指标，其中粮食综合生产能力为约束性指标，稳定在760亿斤以上。\n\n《规划》突出7项重点任务，明确坚持产量产能、生产生态、增产增收一起抓，加快推进优土、优种、优产、优储、优销“五优联动”，强化科技和改革双轮驱动，培育农业新质生产力，以县域为切入点推进城乡融合，加快宜居宜业和美乡村建设。\n\n《规划》部署了耕地质量提升行动、设施农业现代化提升工程、“人工智能+农业”141行动、宜居宜业和美乡村示范建设、“新农人”队伍培育等重大工程和行动。《规划》要求，加强党对“三农”工作的领导，强化乡村振兴统筹推进机制，加强“三农”工作力量，推进农业农村法治建设。","新华日报","2026-09-24T00:19:00Z",76,{"impact":18,"substance":227,"depth":228,"authority":13,"freshness":63,"relevant":20,"comment":229},21,17,"省级“十五五”三农顶层规划，含16项指标与“人工智能+农业”141行动等具体工程，政策条款与数字细节扎实，对智慧农业与数字乡村主题有较高聚合价值。",[231],{"name":223,"url":220},[233,234,129,142,235,236],"农业人工智能","十五五规划","城乡融合","和美乡村",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":240},{"candidates":241,"agricultural_evidence":45},[242,247,251,256],{"code":31,"score":243,"supported":45,"title":244,"abstract":245,"tags":246},16,[142],[48,142],[142,129],{"code":145,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":248,"abstract":249,"tags":250},[],[],[235],{"code":252,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":253,"abstract":254,"tags":255},"I2",[],[],[233],{"code":155,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":257,"abstract":258,"tags":259},[],[],[234],[261,262],"江苏 十五五 农业农村现代化规划","人工智能 141行动","江苏十五五农业农村现代化规划-3690","2026-09-29T00:08:18.403861Z",{"id":266,"title":267,"url":268,"summary":269,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":270,"source_url":8,"published_at":271,"category":73,"cover_url":8,"hotness":272,"is_selected":14,"score":273,"score_detail":274,"sources":276,"tags":281,"primary_topic":284,"secondary_topics":285,"classification":286,"search_phrases":297,"slug":300,"view_count":139,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":301},3575,"中国农业科学院启动2026年巡察工作——院长黄三文出席并向巡察组组长授权，院党组书记杨振海讲话","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.caas.cn\u002Fxwzx\u002Fnkyw\u002Fa49fd26cf5a9454aa71c51fc89b533c4.htm","9月24日，中国农业科学院召开2026年巡察工作动员部署会，深入学习贯彻习近平总书记关于巡视工作的重要讲话精神，落实农业农村部党组巡视动员部署会要求。院长黄三文出席会议并向巡察组组长授权，院党组书记杨振海出席并讲话，副院长叶玉江出席。会议要求巡察工作紧盯权力和责任，聚焦农业强国建设，紧紧围绕'十五五'开局、农业科技高质量发展、被巡察单位核心职能履行、重大科技任务落地见效、全面从严治党'两个责任'落实等关键事项。","中国农业科学院 2026-09-24","2026-09-24T00:00:00Z",25,67,{"impact":17,"substance":19,"depth":78,"authority":122,"freshness":76,"relevant":20,"comment":275},"国家级科研机构内部巡察部署，属机构治理动态，与农业科技主线关联有限，信息增量一般，不宜进入每日精选。",[277,278],{"name":270,"url":268},{"name":279,"url":280},"中国农业科学院","https:\u002F\u002Fcaas.cn\u002Fxwzx\u002Fnkyw\u002Fa49fd26cf5a9454aa71c51fc89b533c4.htm",[127,84,131,282,283],"巡察工作","全面从严治党",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":287},{"candidates":288,"agricultural_evidence":45},[289,293],{"code":31,"score":139,"supported":45,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},[],[84],[84],{"code":155,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":294,"abstract":295,"tags":296},[],[],[127],[298,299],"中国农业科学院 巡察工作","黄三文 杨振海 巡察","中国农业科学院巡察工作-3575","2026-09-27T00:05:15.138778Z",{"id":303,"title":304,"url":305,"summary":306,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":307,"source_url":8,"published_at":308,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":309,"score_detail":310,"sources":313,"tags":315,"primary_topic":317,"secondary_topics":318,"classification":319,"search_phrases":335,"slug":338,"view_count":59,"doi":8,"paper":339,"created_at":346},3450,"《数智技术赋能农业新质生产力：内在机理、驱动要素与实现进路》","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanzj.com\u002Fhek\u002Fjianghuailuntan\u002Fmulu\u002F678750.html","孙壮珍从数智技术赋能农业新质生产力内在机理入手，分析数智技术赋能农业新质生产力驱动要素，并从主体-组织-制度全域视角提出通过构建利益导向机制、培育新型载体平台、推进制度调适的实现进路。文章认为农业新质生产力有高度的渗透性与广泛的链接性，能够进一步拓展农业的生产空间与效率边界，变革农业生产的工艺、技术与流程，加速我国农业强国建设的进程。","《江淮论坛》\u002F西南科技大学","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":17,"substance":311,"depth":228,"authority":19,"freshness":63,"relevant":20,"comment":312},20,"核心期刊论文，从机理、要素到实现进路系统论述数智技术赋能农业新质生产力，理论增量明确，但属学术探讨而非政策落地，时效性一般。",[314],{"name":307,"url":305},[177,128,129,84,316],"数智技术",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":320},{"candidates":321,"agricultural_evidence":45},[322,327,331],{"code":31,"score":323,"supported":45,"title":324,"abstract":325,"tags":326},5,[],[84],[84,129],{"code":150,"score":59,"supported":14,"title":328,"abstract":329,"tags":330},[],[],[316,128],{"code":51,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":332,"abstract":333,"tags":334},[],[],[177],[336,337],"数智技术 农业新质生产力","江淮论坛 农业新质生产力","数智技术农业新质生产力-3450",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":340,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":163,"oa_url":8,"card":341,"direction":213,"ingested_from":215},[],{"tldr":342,"method":343,"finding":344,"direction":213,"opportunity":345},"分析数智技术赋能农业新质生产力的内在机理、驱动要素与实现进路。","理论分析，从主体-组织-制度全域视角提出机制、平台与制度调适路径。","农业新质生产力具高渗透性与广链接性，可拓展生产空间与效率边界，加速农业强国建设。","可实证检验数智技术赋能农业新质生产力的机制与制度调适效果，弥补纯理论分析不足。","2026-09-25T00:09:34.845621Z"]