[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1165":3,"related-1165":63},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":8,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":31,"secondary_topics":37,"classification":38,"search_phrases":57,"slug":60,"view_count":61,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":62},1165,"中国农业科学院发布中国富硒产业科技发展报告2026 提出十五五富硒产业十大科研攻关方向","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.sn.news.cn\u002F20260831\u002F912c6b6bfa23482dacb9a78a69073539\u002Fc.html","8月31日,以科创未来·硒旺安康为主题的第二届富硒产业科技年会在安康国际会议中心召开,由中国农业科学院、陕西省农业农村厅指导,安康市人民政府、中国农业科技国际交流协会共同主办,全国从事硒研究专家学者主要硒产区代表富硒企业代表共计300余人线下参会。农业农村部食物与营养发展研究所食物资源监测与营养健康评价团队首席科学家朱大洲发布了《中国富硒产业科技发展报告(2026年)》。报告认为近年来富硒产业在脱贫攻坚乡村振兴中发挥了重要作用;以SCI-E数据库和中国知网为数据源,采用文献计量以及CiteSpace关键词聚类时间线和突现词分析等方法,对富硒农业领域科研文献进行分析;面向十五五时期我国富硒产业发展需求,提出了十五五富硒产业十大科研攻关方向建议。",null,"新华网西安8月31日电（记者刘彤 古一平）由中国农业科学院、陕西省农业农村厅指导，安康市人民政府、中国农业科技国际交流协会共同主办，以“科创未来·‘硒’旺安康”为主题的第二届富硒产业科技年会近日在安康国际会议中心召开。全国从事硒研究的专家、学者、主要硒产区代表、富硒企业代表共计300余人线下参会。\n\n会上，农业农村部食物与营养发展研究所食物资源监测与营养健康评价团队首席科学家、研究员朱大洲发布了《中国富硒产业科技发展报告（2026年）》。报告由中国富硒产业研究院、安康市富硒产品研发中心发起，联合农业农村部食物与营养发展研究所、中国富硒农业产业技术创新平台、国家功能农业科技创新联盟、国家富硒农产品加工技术研发专业中心等科技组织，以及国家农业图书馆等专业文献情报机构组织编制。\n\n报告认为，近年来富硒产业在脱贫攻坚、乡村振兴中发挥了重要作用。如何把硒这一宝贵资源转化为富硒产业?科技创新是关键。报告以SCI-E数据库和中国知网为数据源，采用文献计量以及CiteSpace关键词聚类、时间线和突现词分析等方法，对富硒农业领域科研文献进行分析。报告以Incopat数据库为数据源，对富硒农业领域专利的申请趋势、技术分支、主要国家和地区、重点产业主体及专利转让情况进行了分析。\n\n报告对国内外富硒食品及农产品标准法规进行了梳理研究。针对富硒产业发展、科技创新和标准建设中存在的问题，报告提出了六条发展建议：一是加强国家层面顶层设计和跨部门协调；二是加强质量安全风险评估和关键技术创新；三是建立健全富硒农业全产业链标准体系；四是完善富硒农产品分类判定方法和产品标准；五是完善硒投入品标准和富硒农业生产技术规程；六是健全认证监管和科学消费引导机制。面向“十五五”时期我国富硒产业发展需求，报告提出了“十五五”富硒产业十大科研攻关方向建议，以期为相关单位开展科技创新活动提供指引和参考。","新华网陕西频道 2026-08-31","2026-08-31T10:00:00Z","报道",10,true,90,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},28,22,17,14,9,1,"国家级科研机构发布富硒产业科技发展报告，提出十五五十大攻关方向，对产业具有战略指导意义。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30],"富硒产业","科技发展报告","科研攻关","产业规划",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},"I7","research-methods","研究方法与评估","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fresearch-methods","I",[],{"status":39,"locked":40,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"classified",false,"2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":14},[45,52],{"code":46,"score":47,"supported":14,"title":48,"abstract":49,"tags":51},"G",3,[],[50],"乡村振兴",[],{"code":32,"score":47,"supported":14,"title":53,"abstract":54,"tags":56},[],[55],"文献计量",[],[58,59],"科技发展报告 产业规划 富硒产业 科研攻关","科技发展报告 产业规划","科技发展报告产业规划富硒产业科研攻关-1165",4,"2026-09-01T00:03:36.594099Z",{"total":64,"page":22,"page_size":64,"items":65},2,[66,135],{"id":67,"title":68,"url":69,"summary":70,"summary_zh":71,"content":8,"source_name":72,"source_url":69,"published_at":73,"category":74,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":40,"score":75,"score_detail":76,"sources":80,"tags":82,"primary_topic":88,"secondary_topics":89,"classification":90,"search_phrases":105,"slug":108,"view_count":22,"doi":109,"paper":110,"created_at":134},4334,"Making livestock systems comparable: the HAPPINESS framework for comparative livestock sustainability research","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1974030","Introduction Livestock sustainability research increasingly addresses ecological, institutional, cultural, economic, technological, and ethical problems, yet cross-site comparisons and benchmarking frameworks often leave underexamined the conditions under which findings, metrics, and interventions become comparable or transferable across production settings. This article examines how a U.S.-centered, historically influential formation of animal science, traced through the American Society of Animal Science archive, repeatedly recognized the challenge of responsibly generalizing findings across diverse production settings while often narrating it from disciplinary and geopolitical authority. Rather than treating this archive as representative of animal science as such, the article reads it as a situated case through which questions of comparison, transferability, and knowledge circulation become visible. Methods The study uses historical interpretive document analysis informed by reflexive thematic analysis to examine a 70-document corpus comprising presidential addresses and selected non-presidential interventions associated with the American Society of Animal Science from 1909 to 2004. Through iterative reading, coding, and interpretation, the analysis identifies recurring and contested patterns in how this institutional discourse constructed animal production as a scientific, social, ecological, and institutional problem. Results The analysis shows that animal science repeatedly recognized the limits of narrow specialization, isolated experiments, and fragmented problem solving. Across the archive, leaders called for broader scope, synthesis, coordination, attention to land use, engagement with global animal production, and responsiveness to public concerns. However, these expansions were not consolidated into an explicit comparative methodology adequate to heterogeneous livestock systems, including the institutional, political, and social conditions that shape whether findings and interventions can travel responsibly. In response, the article develops HAPPINESS, a livestock-specific translation of comparative case study methodology organized across nine domains. Discussion The framework shifts comparative inquiry away from cross-site benchmarking and toward analysis of livestock problems as produced across interacting biological, ecological, technical, institutional, economic, and social conditions. By making visible how some categories and knowledge claims acquire authority to travel as universal while others are treated as local or context-specific, the framework also contributes to debates about epistemic justice in food-systems research and governance.","引言  livestock可持续性研究日益涉及生态、制度、文化、经济、技术和伦理问题，但跨地点比较和基准框架往往未能充分审视研究结果、指标和干预措施在何种条件下可在不同生产环境之间进行比较或转移。本文考察了一种以美国为中心、历史上具有影响力的动物科学形态——通过美国动物科学学会档案加以追溯——如何反复认识到在不同生产环境之间负责任地推广研究结果所面临的挑战，同时又往往从学科和地缘政治权威的角度来叙述这一问题。本文并未将该档案视为动物科学本身的代表，而是将其解读为一个情境化案例，借此使比较、可转移性和知识流通等问题变得可见。方法  本研究采用历史解释性文献分析，并借鉴反思性主题分析，考察了一个由70份文献组成的语料库，其中包括1909年至2004年间与美国动物科学学会相关的会长致辞和选定的非会长干预文献。通过反复阅读、编码和解释，分析识别出该制度性话语在将动物生产建构为科学、社会、生态和制度问题时反复出现且存在争议的模式。结果  分析表明，动物科学反复认识到狭隘专业化、孤立实验和碎片化问题解决的局限。在整个档案中，领导者呼吁扩大范围、综合、协调、关注土地利用、参与全球动物生产以及对公众关切作出回应。然而，这些扩展并未整合为一种足以应对异质性畜牧系统的明确比较方法论，包括塑造研究结果和干预措施能否负责任地传播的制度、政治和社会条件。作为回应，本文提出了HAPPINESS，这是比较案例研究方法论在畜牧领域的特定转化，围绕九个领域加以组织。讨论  该框架将比较探究从跨地点基准测试转向对畜牧问题的分析，将其视为在相互作用的生物、生态、技术、制度、经济和社会条件中产生的问题。通过使某些类别和知识分","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-06T00:00:00Z","论文",65,{"impact":77,"substance":78,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":77,"relevant":22,"comment":79},8,18,"基于美国动物科学学会百年档案的史学分析，提出HAPPINESS比较研究框架，方法新颖但偏理论，对国内农业信息化实践的直接参考价值有限。",[81],{"name":72,"url":69},[83,84,85,86,87],"农业科研","畜牧可持续","比较研究","知识转移","粮食系统治理",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":40,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":91},{"candidates":92,"agricultural_evidence":14},[93,100],{"code":94,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":95,"abstract":97,"tags":99},"C",[96],"livestock",[98,96],"畜牧",[],{"code":32,"score":47,"supported":14,"title":101,"abstract":102,"tags":104},[],[103],"研究方法",[],[106,107],"美国动物科学学会 畜牧可持续","粮食系统治理 畜牧可持续 农业科研 比较研究","美国动物科学学会畜牧可持续-4334","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1974030",{"doi":109,"openalex_id":111,"authors":112,"venue":72,"cited_by_count":125,"oa_url":126,"card":127,"direction":131,"ingested_from":133},"W7220738667",[113,116,119,122],{"name":114,"orcid":115},"Samira Chatila","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9337-7605",{"name":117,"orcid":118},"G. C. Shurson","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7095-4799",{"name":120,"orcid":121},"Maria Pieters","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9685-2037",{"name":123,"orcid":124},"Pedro E Urriola","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4090-6627",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1974030\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":128,"method":129,"finding":130,"direction":131,"opportunity":132},"通过分析美国动物科学学会档案，提出HAPPINESS框架以比较不同畜牧系统的可持续性。","历史解释性文档分析，对1909-2004年70份文献进行反思性主题分析。","动物科学长期呼吁跨系统比较，但缺乏明确方法论；HAPPINESS框架填补此空白。","其他","可将HAPPINESS框架应用于智慧农业场景，开发跨系统可比的数据标准与决策模型。","openalex","2026-10-07T23:30:06.641537Z",{"id":136,"title":137,"url":138,"summary":139,"summary_zh":8,"content":140,"source_name":141,"source_url":8,"published_at":142,"category":143,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":40,"score":144,"score_detail":145,"sources":151,"tags":153,"primary_topic":158,"secondary_topics":164,"classification":165,"search_phrases":188,"slug":191,"view_count":125,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":192},5420,"广西印发具身智能产业创新发展五年行动计划 布局具身智能加现代农业场景","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.nanning.gov.cn\u002Fzt\u002Frdzt\u002Fyhyshj\u002Fyszc\u002Fbrphcx\u002Ft6740281.html","广西壮族自治区党委科技委员会办公室印发《具身智能产业创新发展五年行动计划（2026—2030年）》（桂科委办发〔2026〕12号），在农业领域明确要求凝练具身智能在农产品采摘、优势作物种植、养殖巡检等真实场景的技术需求，面向矿山开采、农产品采摘、海洋渔业、物流运输等场景开展特种机器人技术攻关。行动提出到2030年组织实施30项以上重点科技攻关项目、培育2家以上具身智能龙头企业、10家以上科技型中小企业、打造20个以上应用场景标杆，其中包括「具身智能+现代农业」场景。农业机器人与采摘装备由此获得明确的地方产业政策支持路径。","（十）挖掘特色应用场景需求。建立健全具身智能应用场景挖掘机制，面向企业、高校、科研院所、医疗机构等，在工业制造、教育培训、科研应用、民生服务等领域常态化征集具身智能应用场景需求，挖掘一批技术适配性强、应用价值高、示范效应好、可复制推广的具身智能应用场景。（责任单位：自治区数据局、发展改革委、教育厅、科技厅、工业和信息化厅、卫生健康委等）\n\n（十一）大力培育标杆应用场景。聚焦广西有色金属及关键金属材料、先进钢铁材料、现代绿色化工、新一代信息技术、机械及高端装备制造、新能源汽车及电池、林产加工及纸业、食品加工、生物医药及健康、绿色建材等十大支柱产业发展需求，围绕矿山无人化、高危环境巡检、材料分拣、精密装配、物料搬运、智能检测、远程运维、智能仓储等重要环节，打造“具身智能+制造业”应用场景；在优势作物种植、采摘、养殖巡检等现代农业领域开展创新应用与示范推广，打造“具身智能+现代农业”应用场景；在港口物流、能源、文旅等领域拓展具身智能应用，打造一批融合应用场景。到2030年，打造20个以上应用场景标杆。（责任单位：自治区科技厅、发展改革委、工业和信息化厅、交通运输厅、农业农村厅、文化和旅游厅、数据局等）","南宁市人民政府门户网站 2026-10-15","2026-10-15T00:00:00Z","政策",71,{"impact":78,"substance":146,"depth":147,"authority":148,"freshness":149,"relevant":22,"comment":150},20,16,11,6,"省级具身智能五年行动计划明确布局“具身智能+现代农业”场景，含2030年20个标杆等量化目标，政策条款具体，对农业机器人方向有实质参考价值。",[152],{"name":141,"url":138},[154,155,156,157,30],"智慧农业","农业机器人","具身智能","现代农业",{"code":159,"slug":160,"name":161,"path":162,"parent_code":163},"F6","agricultural-robots","机器人与无人农场","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Fagricultural-robots","F",[],{"status":39,"locked":40,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":166},{"candidates":167,"agricultural_evidence":14},[168,172,178,183],{"code":159,"score":61,"supported":14,"title":169,"abstract":170,"tags":171},[],[155],[155],{"code":173,"score":47,"supported":14,"title":174,"abstract":175,"tags":177},"D",[],[176],"渔业",[],{"code":179,"score":22,"supported":40,"title":180,"abstract":181,"tags":182},"I1",[],[],[154],{"code":184,"score":22,"supported":40,"title":185,"abstract":186,"tags":187},"J2",[],[],[157],[189,190],"广西 具身智能 现代农业","具身智能 农业机器人 应用场景","广西具身智能现代农业-5420","2026-10-21T00:09:54.769055Z"]