[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-1218":3,"related-1218":94},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":21,"tags":23,"primary_topic":29,"secondary_topics":34,"classification":35,"search_phrases":64,"slug":67,"view_count":19,"doi":68,"paper":69,"created_at":93},1218,"No-tillage straw mulching alters fallow rainfall use and improves long-term water balance and yield stability of winter wheat: A 38-year simulation on the Loess Plateau","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104950","No-tillage straw mulching alters fallow rainfall use and improves long-term water balance and yield stability of winter wheat: A 38-year simulation on the Loess Plateau。Agricultural Systems",null,"Agricultural Systems","2026-08-27T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,74,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":19,"relevant":19,"comment":20},18,22,15,1,"38年模拟揭示免耕秸秆覆盖对旱区小麦水分的长期效应，方法严谨，对旱作农业有指导价值。",[22],{"name":9,"url":6},[24,25,26,27,28],"小麦","保护性耕作","旱作农业","作物模型","水资源利用",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},"A2","wheat","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fwheat","A",[],{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":39},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":40,"agricultural_evidence":43},[41,48,54,59],{"code":30,"score":42,"supported":43,"title":44,"abstract":46,"tags":47},23,true,[45,31],"winter wheat",[45,31],[24],{"code":49,"score":50,"supported":13,"title":51,"abstract":52,"tags":53},"H3",2,[],[],[26,28],{"code":55,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":56,"abstract":57,"tags":58},"H8",[],[],[25],{"code":60,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":61,"abstract":62,"tags":63},"I2",[],[],[27],[65,66],"保护性耕作 水资源利用 作物模型 旱作农业","保护性耕作 水资源利用","保护性耕作水资源利用作物模型旱作农业-1218","10.1016\u002Fj.agsy.2026.104950",{"doi":68,"openalex_id":70,"authors":71,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":91,"oa_url":8,"card":8,"direction":8,"ingested_from":92},"W7204454216",[72,75,78,80,83,85,87,89],{"name":73,"orcid":74},"Xinrui Shi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-2188-3696",{"name":76,"orcid":77},"Chao Li","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9579-7889",{"name":79,"orcid":8},"Chen Cui",{"name":81,"orcid":82},"Ping Li","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3761-1262",{"name":84,"orcid":8},"Yuzheng Zong",{"name":86,"orcid":8},"Dongsheng Zhang",{"name":88,"orcid":8},"Zhiqiang Gao",{"name":90,"orcid":8},"Xingyu Hao",0,"openalex","2026-09-01T04:03:06.030710Z",{"total":95,"page":19,"page_size":95,"items":96},6,[97,217,372,417,456,490],{"id":98,"title":99,"url":100,"summary":101,"summary_zh":102,"content":8,"source_name":103,"source_url":100,"published_at":104,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":105,"score_detail":106,"sources":110,"tags":112,"primary_topic":116,"secondary_topics":117,"classification":129,"search_phrases":184,"slug":187,"view_count":19,"doi":188,"paper":189,"created_at":216},3763,"Improving drought tolerance and water use efficiency in dryland wheat and sorghum in the Texas High Plains","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1952813","Texas High Plains (THP) is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the USA, and the economic value of annual total crop production is nearly $2 billion. The area also serves as a major livestock center for fed cattle and, increasingly, other feeding industries such as dairy. The THP has a semi-arid climate with annual precipitation averaging about 480 mm and the seasonal precipitation only can meet part of the evapotranspiration (ET) requirement for high crop yields. For field crop production, drought is the most common factor limiting yield and water use efficiency (WUE). In this review, we focus on research progress and future challenges of dryland cropping systems in the area. Due to the low growing season precipitation and uneven monthly distributions, dryland crops are largely produced under crop-fallow conditions and wheat-fallow and wheat-sorghum fallow are common. Over the decades, both wheat and grain sorghum yields have increased from the level of 1,000–2,000 kg ha −1 in 1950s to >4,000 kg ha −1 in current time. Although improved management practices (e.g., conservation tillage and residue management) have contributed to increased yield and WUE, genetic improvement of drought tolerance also played an important role, particularly the winter wheat. Multiple-year field studies indicated that selecting cultivars with higher biomass and greater early vigor are beneficial to wheat production under drought. We further found that newer drought tolerant (DT) cultivars used soil water more efficiently than a relative older cultivar. Also, new DT cultivars can extract more water from deeper soil profile and have cooler canopy temperature under drought. In recent years, we are also evaluating remote-sensing tools at both ground and aerial levels (airplane and drone) to characterize wheat genotypes for drought tolerance. We demonstrated that infrared thermometer, thermal imaging, and spectral reflectance data can be used to characterize genotypic variation during growing season.","德克萨斯高平原（THP）是美国最具生产力的农业区之一，年度作物总产量的经济价值接近20亿美元。该地区还是主要的肉牛育肥中心，并且日益成为乳业等其他饲养产业的聚集地。THP属于半干旱气候，年均降水量约480毫米，季节性降水仅能满足高产作物蒸散（ET）需求的一部分。对于大田作物生产而言，干旱是限制作物产量和水分利用效率（WUE）的最常见因素。本文综述了该地区旱作种植制度的研究进展与未来挑战。由于生长季降水少且月分布不均，旱地作物主要在作物-休闲制度下生产，小麦-休闲和小麦-高粱休闲是常见模式。数十年来，小麦和高粱产量均从20世纪50年代的1,000–2,000 kg ha⁻¹提高至当前的4,000 kg ha⁻¹以上。尽管改进的管理措施（如保护性耕作和残茬管理）促进了产量和WUE的提升，但耐旱性的遗传改良也发挥了重要作用，尤其是冬小麦。多年田间研究表明，选择生物量较高和早期长势较强的品种有利于干旱条件下的小麦生产。我们进一步发现，较新的耐旱（DT）品种比相对较老的品种更有效地利用土壤水分。此外，新的DT品种能够从更深土层中提取更多水分，并在干旱条件下具有更低的冠层温度。近年来，我们还在评估地面和航空（飞机和无人机）尺度的遥感工具，以表征小麦基因型的耐旱性。我们证明，红外温度计、热成像和光谱反射数据可用于表征生长季内的基因型变异。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-28T00:00:00Z",80,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":107,"freshness":108,"relevant":19,"comment":109},14,8,"综述系统梳理了德州高原旱地小麦高粱抗旱与水分利用效率的研究进展，含多年田间数据与遥感表型新方法，对旱作农业与智慧育种有参考价值。",[111],{"name":103,"url":100},[24,26,113,114,115],"高粱","节水灌溉","遥感育种",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[118,123],{"code":119,"slug":120,"name":121,"path":122,"parent_code":33},"A5","tubers-grains","薯类与杂粮","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Ftubers-grains",{"code":124,"slug":125,"name":126,"path":127,"parent_code":128},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":130},{"candidates":131,"agricultural_evidence":43},[132,136,141,147,154,161,167,174,178],{"code":30,"score":16,"supported":43,"title":133,"abstract":134,"tags":135},[31],[24,45,31],[24],{"code":119,"score":18,"supported":43,"title":137,"abstract":139,"tags":140},[138],"sorghum",[113,138],[113],{"code":124,"score":107,"supported":43,"title":142,"abstract":144,"tags":146},[143],"drought",[145,143],"干旱",[],{"code":148,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":149,"abstract":150,"tags":153},"C2",[],[151,152],"肉牛","cattle",[],{"code":155,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":156,"abstract":157,"tags":160},"H2",[],[158,159],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":49,"score":162,"supported":43,"title":163,"abstract":164,"tags":166},5,[],[165],"evapotranspiration",[26,114],{"code":168,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":170,"abstract":171,"tags":173},"C",3,[],[172],"livestock",[],{"code":55,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":175,"abstract":176,"tags":177},[],[25],[],{"code":179,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":180,"abstract":181,"tags":183},"I3",[],[182],"遥感",[],[185,186],"Texas High Plains 小麦 高粱 抗旱","旱地小麦 水分利用效率 遥感","TexasHighPlains小麦高粱抗旱-3763","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1952813",{"doi":188,"openalex_id":190,"authors":191,"venue":103,"cited_by_count":91,"oa_url":209,"card":210,"direction":214,"ingested_from":92},"W7214633314",[192,194,197,200,203,205,207],{"name":193,"orcid":8},"薛青武",{"name":195,"orcid":196},"Sushil Thapa","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5589-8124",{"name":198,"orcid":199},"Shuyu Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4748-2900",{"name":201,"orcid":202},"Jackie Rudd","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9186-3386",{"name":204,"orcid":8},"Jourdan Bell",{"name":206,"orcid":8},"Thomas Marek",{"name":208,"orcid":8},"Amir Ibrahim","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1952813\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":211,"method":212,"finding":213,"direction":214,"opportunity":215},"综述美国德州高平原旱地小麦和高粱提高耐旱性与水分利用效率的研究进展与挑战。","多年田间试验、保护性耕作、耐旱品种选育及地面与航空遥感表型工具。","耐旱新品种能更高效利用土壤水、深层取水且冠层温度更低，遥感可表征基因型变异。","农业遥感与作物表型","可结合无人机热成像与光谱反射构建旱地作物耐旱表型高通量筛选模型，加速品种选育。","2026-09-29T23:30:07.283028Z",{"id":218,"title":219,"url":220,"summary":221,"summary_zh":222,"content":8,"source_name":103,"source_url":220,"published_at":104,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":105,"score_detail":223,"sources":227,"tags":229,"primary_topic":233,"secondary_topics":234,"classification":245,"search_phrases":310,"slug":313,"view_count":169,"doi":314,"paper":315,"created_at":371},3759,"Synergistic interaction effects of precision phosphorus fertigation and residue management on productivity, profitability, and resource-use efficiency of wheat under conservation agriculture","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1944629","Phosphorus (P) management under conventional surface-broadcast application in calcareous soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) suffers from severe fixation losses, limiting phosphorus-use efficiency (PUE) to 10–25% and contributing to yield gaps in wheat, a globally important food security crops. A two-year (2023–24 and 2024–25) split-plot field experiment was conducted within a mid-term conservation agriculture (CA)-based maize-wheat-greengram system to evaluate nine phosphorus fertigation levels and split application schedules through subsurface drip fertigation (SSDF), combined with two residue management practices (retention: R+, no-retention: R-), on growth, yield, water productivity, economics, and resource-use efficiency and post-harvest available phosphorus of wheat (cv. HD 2967). Treatments included no-P (control), SSDF of P as DAP at 50, 75, and 100% of the recommended dose (RDP; 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ) applied either fully as basal (10 DAS) or split (10 and 25 DAS), along with a nano-DAP foliar spray, compared against conventional CA with flood irrigation and basal broadcast P (CA-FI-100% RDP-B). SSDF treatments consumed only 178–275 mm of total water input against 437–452 mm under flood irrigation. Among SSDF treatments, 100% RDP applied in two splits (100% RDP-2S) consistently recorded the highest growth attributes, grain yield (6.23 and 6.31 t ha −1 ), and economic returns (BCR: 1.8–2) across both years, improving grain yield by 10.6–11.5% and net returns by 13.7% over CA-FI-100% RDP-B. Notably, 75% RDP-2S was statistically comparable to 100% RDP-2S for yield and profitability, demonstrating that a 25% reduction in P dose under precision SSDF does not compromise productivity. Total and irrigation water productivity improved by 127.7 and 156.7%, respectively, under 100% RDP-2S over CA-FI-100% RDP-B. Residue retention further enhanced productivity, increasing grain yield by 14.0–15.0% and net returns by 26.4–27.5%. Post-harvest soil available P was 18.0 and 43.3% higher under SSDF than under CA-FI-100% RDP-B at 0–15 and 15–30 cm, respectively. The interaction of split P fertigation and residue retention was consistently superior for grain yield and water productivity. These findings establish 75–100% RDP delivered through split SSDF, combined with residue retention, as an agronomically superior, water-efficient, economically viable strategy for sustainable wheat intensification in the semi-arid IGPs.","在印度河-恒河平原（IGP）石灰性土壤上，常规地表撒施条件下的磷（P）管理面临严重的固定损失，导致磷利用效率（PUE）仅为10–25%，并造成小麦——一种全球重要的粮食安全作物——的产量差距。在中期保护性农业（CA）为基础的玉米-小麦-绿豆轮作体系中，开展了一项为期两年（2023–24和2024–25）的裂区田间试验，评估九种磷肥滴灌水平和分次施用方案通过地下滴灌施肥（SSDF）对小麦（品种HD 2967）生长、产量、水分生产力、经济效益、资源利用效率及收获后土壤有效磷的影响，并结合两种秸秆管理方式（还田：R+，不还田：R-）。处理包括：无磷（对照）、以DAP形式通过SSDF施用推荐施磷量（RDP；60 kg P₂O₅ ha⁻¹）的50%、75%和100%，分别以全部基施（播种后10天）或分次施用（播种后10天和25天），同时配合纳米DAP叶面喷施，并与常规保护性农业配合漫灌和基施撒施磷（CA-FI-100% RDP-B）进行比较。SSDF处理的总水分投入仅为178–275 mm，而漫灌条件下为437–452 mm。在SSDF处理中，100% RDP分两次施用（100% RDP-2S）在两年中均持续表现出最高的生长指标、籽粒产量（6.23和6.31 t ha⁻¹）和经济效益（BCR：1.8–2），较CA-FI-100% RDP-B分别提高籽粒产量10.6–11.5%和净收益13.7%。值得注意的是，75% RDP-2S在产量和盈利能力上与100% RDP-2S无统计学差异，表明在精准SSDF下减少25%的磷用量不会影响生产力。与CA-FI-100% RDP-B相比，100% RDP-2S处理下总水分生产力和灌溉水分生产力分别提高了127.7%和156.7%。秸秆还田进一步提高了生产力，使籽粒产量增加14.0–15.0%，净收益增加26.4–27.5%。收获后土壤有效磷在0–15 cm和15–30 cm土层中，SSDF较CA-FI-100% RDP-B分别高出18.0%和43.3%。分次磷肥滴灌与秸秆还田的交互作用在籽粒产量和水分生产力方面始终表现最优。这些研究结果表明，通过分次SSDF施用75–100% RDP并结合秸秆还田，是一种农艺上优越、水分高效、经济可行的策略，可用于半干旱印度河-恒河平原小麦的可持续集约化生产。",{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":224,"freshness":225,"relevant":19,"comment":226},13,9,"两年田间试验证实分次地下滴灌施磷配合秸秆还田可减磷25%并显著提升小麦产量与水肥利用效率，数据扎实、结论可靠，对半干旱地区精准水肥管理有直接参考价值。",[228],{"name":103,"url":220},[230,231,24,25,232],"智慧农业","精准施肥","水肥一体化",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[235,241],{"code":236,"slug":237,"name":238,"path":239,"parent_code":240},"F3","fertilizers","肥料与水肥一体化","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Ffertilizers","F",{"code":55,"slug":242,"name":243,"path":244,"parent_code":128},"sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture",{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":246},{"candidates":247,"agricultural_evidence":43},[248,255,259,265,272,279,283,289,295,301,305],{"code":236,"score":249,"supported":43,"title":250,"abstract":252,"tags":254},16,[251],"fertigation",[253,251],"施肥",[232,231],{"code":30,"score":18,"supported":43,"title":256,"abstract":257,"tags":258},[31],[24,31],[24],{"code":55,"score":260,"supported":43,"title":261,"abstract":263,"tags":264},12,[262],"conservation agriculture",[262],[25],{"code":266,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":267,"abstract":268,"tags":271},"A3",[],[269,270],"玉米","maize",[],{"code":273,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":274,"abstract":275,"tags":278},"A8",[],[276,277],"粮食安全","food security",[],{"code":155,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":280,"abstract":281,"tags":282},[],[158,159],[],{"code":49,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":284,"abstract":285,"tags":288},[],[286,287],"灌溉","irrigation",[],{"code":290,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":291,"abstract":292,"tags":294},"A7",[],[293],"轮作",[],{"code":296,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":297,"abstract":298,"tags":300},"H5",[],[299],"秸秆还田",[],{"code":124,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":302,"abstract":303,"tags":304},[],[145],[],{"code":306,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":307,"abstract":308,"tags":309},"I1",[],[],[230],[311,312],"地下滴灌 磷肥 小麦","保护性耕作 秸秆还田 小麦","地下滴灌磷肥小麦-3759","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1944629",{"doi":314,"openalex_id":316,"authors":317,"venue":103,"cited_by_count":91,"oa_url":220,"card":365,"direction":369,"ingested_from":92},"W7214579192",[318,320,323,325,327,329,331,334,336,338,340,342,344,347,349,351,354,357,360,363],{"name":319,"orcid":8},"Kadagonda Nithinkumar",{"name":321,"orcid":322},"Anchal Dass","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3909-1803",{"name":324,"orcid":8},"Devika A. R.",{"name":326,"orcid":8},"Arjun Singh",{"name":328,"orcid":8},"Susama Sudhishri",{"name":330,"orcid":8},"Vinod Kumar Singh",{"name":332,"orcid":333},"Sanjay Singh Rathore","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6725-1478",{"name":335,"orcid":8},"Sarvendra Kumar",{"name":337,"orcid":8},"Teekam Singh",{"name":339,"orcid":8},"Jitendra Rajput",{"name":341,"orcid":8},"Pravin Kumar Upadhyaya",{"name":343,"orcid":8},"R. N. Sahoo",{"name":345,"orcid":346},"ARPULA SAIRAM","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0009-9034-6032",{"name":348,"orcid":8},"Aye Aye San",{"name":350,"orcid":8},"K. S. Sachin",{"name":352,"orcid":353},"Mummasani Asritha","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-4619-9943",{"name":355,"orcid":356},"Ramanjit Kaur","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5117-050X",{"name":358,"orcid":359},"Mona Nagargade","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1062-512X",{"name":361,"orcid":362},"Vishal Tyagi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5593-3076",{"name":364,"orcid":8},"Subhash Babu",{"tldr":366,"method":367,"finding":368,"direction":369,"opportunity":370},"研究保护性农业下精准磷肥滴灌与秸秆还田对小麦产量、收益和资源效率的协同效应。","两年裂区田间试验，地下滴灌分次施磷与秸秆还田处理，测产量、水生产力与经济指标。","75–100%推荐磷量分次滴灌配秸秆还田可增产10%以上、节水超一倍且不减产。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","可探索基于土壤磷素实时监测的变量施磷决策模型，并与秸秆还田互作机制结合优化。","2026-09-29T23:30:06.859116Z",{"id":373,"title":374,"url":375,"summary":376,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":377,"source_url":8,"published_at":378,"category":379,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":380,"score_detail":381,"sources":384,"tags":386,"primary_topic":391,"secondary_topics":392,"classification":393,"search_phrases":412,"slug":415,"view_count":91,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":416},5443,"四川省农科院作物所优质弱筋小麦新品种「川麦632」品种权转让公示","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.chinawestagr.com\u002Fhomepage\u002FshowAffiche.asp?id=3026","四川省农业科学院作物研究所（四川省种质资源中心）公示小麦品种「川麦632」品种权转让结果，受让方为四川均隆生物科技有限公司。「川麦632」是该所选育的优质弱筋小麦新品种，已于 2026 年 10 月通过品种报审，由蒲宗君等 9 位育种人完成。转让费采用入门费加提成费方式，入门费 30 万元，签订合同后支付 5 万元、审定公告出号后支付尾款 25 万元；提成费自 2029 年起按每销售一公斤种子提成 0.1 元，公示期至 2026 年 11 月 2 日。","四川省农业科学院 2026-10-19","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z","报道",67,{"impact":249,"substance":382,"depth":260,"authority":224,"freshness":95,"relevant":19,"comment":383},20,"省级科研机构小麦新品种品种权转让公示，含转让费与提成条款等实质信息，对种业成果转化有参考价值，但属细分行业进展。",[385],{"name":377,"url":375},[387,388,24,389,390],"种业振兴","成果转化","品种权转让","弱筋小麦",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[],{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":394},{"candidates":395,"agricultural_evidence":43},[396,400,407],{"code":30,"score":260,"supported":43,"title":397,"abstract":398,"tags":399},[24],[24],[24],{"code":401,"score":402,"supported":43,"title":403,"abstract":404,"tags":406},"F1",4,[],[405],"种质资源",[387],{"code":408,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":409,"abstract":410,"tags":411},"G1",[],[],[388],[413,414],"川麦632 品种权转让","四川省农科院 弱筋小麦","川麦632品种权转让-5443","2026-10-21T00:10:01.857857Z",{"id":418,"title":419,"url":420,"summary":421,"summary_zh":8,"content":422,"source_name":423,"source_url":8,"published_at":424,"category":379,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":425,"score_detail":426,"sources":428,"tags":430,"primary_topic":434,"secondary_topics":435,"classification":436,"search_phrases":451,"slug":454,"view_count":91,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":455},5431,"山东农科院作物所阳信小麦试验示范基地 100 余亩展示田开始播种","https:\u002F\u002Fnews.qq.com\u002Frain\u002Fa\u002F20261020A0B4TW00","10 月 20 日，山东省农科院作物研究所阳信小麦试验示范基地 2026 年小麦品种播种现场启动，100 多亩展示田开始秋播。该基地由作物所与阳信县农村专业技术协会共建，9 月 15 日签约揭牌，作物所聘请科技成果转化推广专员刘洪彬担任技术指导员。基地以展示济麦系列优质高产及特色营养小麦新品种为核心，同步开展新品种新技术推广与人才培训，并从良种繁育前端与特色营养小麦加工后端两端拉长产业链。","10月20日，在位于阳信县农村技术协会的小麦播种田里，大型播种机在100多亩小麦品种展示基地回穿梭，不时传出技术人员下达的技术指令声，“播种机进地播种时一定检查好播种定量指针”“底肥和种子同期播种必须保持好安全距离”等技术措施不时从现场技术指导老师刘洪彬的嘴里发出。\n\n原来这是山东省农科院作物所山东省农业科学院作物研究所阳信小麦试验示范基地2026年的小麦品种播种现场，阳信县农技协会会长王保友在忙着记录数据、搬运种子，确保严格程序，完成高质量播种工作。\n\n今年9月15日，山东省农业科学院作物研究所阳信县小麦试验示范基地在阳信举行签约揭牌仪式。在随后召开的座谈会上，省农科院作物研究所小麦专家围绕济麦系列小麦新品种的特征特性、栽培要点等进行详细介绍。\n\n近年来，阳信县持续深化产学研合作，积极引进推广小麦新品种、新技术，粮食综合生产能力稳步提升。此次小麦试验示范基地的共建，将进一步推动济麦系列优良品种在该县规模化应用，打造农业科技创新与示范推广的县域样板，为全县小麦等粮食作物单产提升注入科技动能。\n\n基地由山东省农业科学院作物研究所与阳信农村专业技术协会共同打造建设，聘请山东省农科院作物所科技成果转化推广专员刘洪彬为小麦高质量栽培技术指导员。坚持“技术成果带动、试验示范结合、责任权利清晰、合作互利共赢”的原则，围绕山东省农业科学院作物研究所育成的小麦新品种（系）进行试验示范，开展新品种、新技术推广及人才培训，打造科技引领型小麦产业提质增效的阳信样板。旨在建设小麦新品种（系）展示平台，展示济麦系列优质高产及特色营养小麦新品种（系）。建立优质原粮生产基地，促进优质特色营养小麦产业化开发。以基地为核心，带动周边发展高产优质特色营养小麦生产，为当地面粉加工企业提供优质原料.延长小麦产业链，打造小麦产业提质增效的样板。\n\n在新品种展示示范的基础上，从两端拉长小麦产业链，前端引入种业企业，进一步发展小麦良种繁育，打造良种繁育基地；后端开发特色营养小麦加工，形成良种繁育—示范推广—产品加工完整产业链，不断提升小麦产业附加值。","山东省农业科学院 2026-10-20","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",56,{"impact":260,"substance":224,"depth":12,"authority":260,"freshness":225,"relevant":19,"comment":427},"省级科研机构与县域共建小麦新品种示范基地的常规进展报道，有具体合作机制与产业链思路，但属区域性动态，公共影响有限。",[429],{"name":423,"url":420},[387,24,431,432,433],"济麦系列","院地合作","试验示范",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[],{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":437},{"candidates":438,"agricultural_evidence":43},[439,443,447],{"code":30,"score":224,"supported":43,"title":440,"abstract":441,"tags":442},[24],[24],[24,431],{"code":408,"score":402,"supported":43,"title":444,"abstract":445,"tags":446},[],[388],[432],{"code":401,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":448,"abstract":449,"tags":450},[],[],[387],[452,453],"山东农科院 阳信 小麦试验示范基地","济麦系列 小麦 示范推广","山东农科院阳信小麦试验示范基地-5431","2026-10-21T00:10:00.947422Z",{"id":457,"title":458,"url":459,"summary":460,"summary_zh":8,"content":461,"source_name":462,"source_url":8,"published_at":463,"category":379,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":464,"score_detail":465,"sources":467,"tags":469,"primary_topic":472,"secondary_topics":473,"classification":474,"search_phrases":485,"slug":488,"view_count":91,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":489},5215,"山东省农科院发布小麦新品种\"济麦51\"独占许可公告","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.saas.ac.cn\u002Farticles\u002Fch14047\u002F202610\u002Ff2d31316-caee-4f09-b97a-ceba2d6abcba.shtml","2026年10月16日,山东省农业科学院发布小麦新品种\"济麦51\"独占许可公告,登记编号国审麦20261037,半冬性、全生育期234.2天,株高79.4厘米,平均亩产583.7-628.7千克,拟转化方式为独占许可,截止日期为2026年10月20日。","品种简介：半冬性，全生育期234.2天，与对照品种济麦22熟期相当。株高79.4厘米，抗倒性较好，平均亩穗数42.3万穗，穗粒数34.6粒，千粒重46.1克。高感赤霉病，高感条锈病，高感叶锈病，中感纹枯病，中感白粉病。抗寒性中等。籽粒容重815克\u002F升、838克\u002F升，蛋白质含量13.2%、13.6%，湿面筋含量29.4%、31.5%，稳定时间2.6分钟、3.2分钟，吸水率61.0%、63.3%。2022—2023年度参加黄淮冬麦区北片水地组区域试验，平均亩产583.7千克，比对照济麦22增产5.38%；2023—2024年度续试，平均亩产603.0千克，比对照济麦22增产4.31%；2024—2025年度生产试验，平均亩产628.7千克，比对照济麦22增产3.78%。","山东省农业科学院成果转化处(2026-10-16)","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":107,"authority":224,"freshness":108,"relevant":19,"comment":466},"省级科研机构发布小麦新品种独占许可，含完整区试产量与品质数据，对种业转化有实质参考价值。",[468],{"name":462,"url":459},[387,24,470,471],"品种许可","济麦51",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[],{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":475},{"candidates":476,"agricultural_evidence":43},[477,481],{"code":30,"score":260,"supported":43,"title":478,"abstract":479,"tags":480},[24],[24],[24],{"code":401,"score":19,"supported":13,"title":482,"abstract":483,"tags":484},[],[],[387],[486,487],"山东省农科院 济麦51 独占许可","济麦51 小麦品种","山东省农科院济麦51独占许可-5215","2026-10-18T00:05:23.255694Z",{"id":491,"title":492,"url":493,"summary":494,"summary_zh":495,"content":8,"source_name":496,"source_url":493,"published_at":497,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":498,"score_detail":499,"sources":501,"tags":503,"primary_topic":507,"secondary_topics":508,"classification":509,"search_phrases":537,"slug":540,"view_count":91,"doi":541,"paper":542,"created_at":563},4820,"Integrated strategies for improving lodging resistance in wheat: physiological mechanisms, plant growth regulators and agronomic management","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffpls.2026.1925460","Wheat lodging remains a major constraint to sustainable wheat production because it reduces grain yield and quality, increases harvesting losses and lowers production efficiency. The widespread cultivation of high-yielding cultivars, intensive nitrogen fertilization, higher planting densities, expansion of irrigated agriculture, and increasingly frequent extreme weather events have collectively increased lodging susceptibility, making effective management an important priority. Lodging is a complex phenomenon governed by interactions among plant architecture, stem mechanical properties, root anchorage, crop management practices and environmental conditions. Consequently, improving lodging resistance requires an integrated approach that combines physiological understanding with practical agronomic interventions. This review synthesizes recent advances in the structural, physiological, biochemical and agronomic mechanisms underlying lodging resistance in wheat. Particular emphasis is placed on stem biomechanics, basal internode characteristics, cell wall composition, lignin and cellulose deposition, root system architecture, and genetic factors that collectively determine plant stability. The review further examines the influence of major agronomic practices, including nitrogen management, plant population, sowing time, irrigation scheduling and cultivar selection, on lodging risk under diverse production environments. In addition, the physiological responses, field performance, practical applications and limitations of commonly used plant growth regulators, including chlormequat chloride, trinexapac-ethyl, paclobutrazol, uniconazole and ethephon, are critically evaluated in relation to their roles in improving stem strength and reducing lodging. The available evidence indicates that no single strategy provides consistent lodging control across all production systems. Instead, durable improvement in lodging resistance depends on integrating genetic improvement, balanced crop nutrition, optimized agronomic management, and judicious use of plant growth regulators according to local environmental conditions. The review also highlights emerging opportunities offered by precision agriculture, high-throughput phenotyping, advanced spray technologies, and improved understanding of stem biomechanics and root anchorage. Together, these advances provide a framework for developing sustainable, climate-resilient lodging management strategies that enhance wheat productivity, crop stability and resource-use efficiency, while also highlighting key research priorities for future investigation.","小麦倒伏仍是可持续小麦生产的主要制约因素，因为它降低籽粒产量和品质，增加收获损失并降低生产效率。高产栽培品种的广泛种植、集约化氮肥施用、更高的种植密度、灌溉农业的扩张以及日益频繁的极端天气事件，共同增加了倒伏易感性，使有效管理成为重要优先事项。倒伏是一种复杂现象，受植株结构、茎秆力学特性、根系锚定、作物管理措施和环境条件之间相互作用的支配。因此，提高抗倒伏性需要将生理学认识与实际农艺干预相结合的综合方法。本综述综合了小麦抗倒伏性所依据的结构、生理、生化和农艺机制方面的最新进展。特别强调了茎秆生物力学、基部节间特征、细胞壁组成、木质素和纤维素沉积、根系构型以及共同决定植株稳定性的遗传因素。本综述进一步考察了主要农艺措施，包括氮素管理、植株群体、播期、灌溉制度和品种选择，在不同生产环境下对倒伏风险的影响。此外，对常用植物生长调节剂，包括矮壮素(chlormequat chloride)、抗倒酯(trinexapac-ethyl)、多效唑(paclobutrazol)、烯效唑(uniconazole)和乙烯利(ethephon)，在其提高茎秆强度和减少倒伏的作用方面，对其生理响应、田间表现、实际应用和局限性进行了批判性评价。现有证据表明，没有任何单一策略能够在所有生产系统中提供一致的倒伏控制。相反，抗倒伏性的持久改善取决于将遗传改良、平衡作物营养、优化农艺管理以及根据当地环境条件合理使用植物生长调节剂相结合。本综述还强调了精准农业、高通量表型分析、先进喷雾技术以及对茎秆生物力学和根系锚定认识的提高所提供的新兴机遇。总之，这些进展为开发可持续、气候适应型的倒伏管理策略提供了框架，从而提高小麦生产","Frontiers in Plant Science","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",81,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":107,"freshness":225,"relevant":19,"comment":500},"系统综述小麦抗倒伏的生理机制、生长调节剂与农艺管理，信息增量与专业深度较高，对小麦稳产与智慧化管理有参考价值。",[502],{"name":496,"url":493},[230,24,504,505,506],"抗倒伏","植物生长调节剂","农艺管理",{"code":30,"slug":31,"name":24,"path":32,"parent_code":33},[],{"status":36,"locked":13,"version":37,"method":38,"evidence":510},{"candidates":511,"agricultural_evidence":43},[512,516,523,527,532],{"code":30,"score":18,"supported":43,"title":513,"abstract":514,"tags":515},[31],[24,31],[24],{"code":306,"score":517,"supported":43,"title":518,"abstract":519,"tags":522},7,[],[520,521],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[230],{"code":49,"score":95,"supported":43,"title":524,"abstract":525,"tags":526},[],[286,287],[],{"code":236,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":528,"abstract":529,"tags":531},[],[530],"fertilization",[],{"code":124,"score":169,"supported":43,"title":533,"abstract":534,"tags":536},[],[535],"气候适应",[],[538,539],"小麦 抗倒伏 栽培管理","小麦 植物生长调节剂 矮壮素","小麦抗倒伏栽培管理-4820","10.3389\u002Ffpls.2026.1925460",{"doi":541,"openalex_id":543,"authors":544,"venue":496,"cited_by_count":91,"oa_url":556,"card":557,"direction":214,"ingested_from":92},"W7221517218",[545,547,549,551,554],{"name":546,"orcid":8},"Kavita Devi",{"name":548,"orcid":8},"Jasdev Singh Deol",{"name":550,"orcid":8},"Amit Kaul",{"name":552,"orcid":553},"Arun Kumar","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0106-2735",{"name":555,"orcid":8},"Rahul Sharma","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fplant-science\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffpls.2026.1925460\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":558,"method":559,"finding":560,"direction":561,"opportunity":562},"综述小麦抗倒伏的生理机制、植物生长调节剂与农艺管理，提出综合防控策略。","文献综述，整合茎秆生物力学、细胞壁、根系及农艺与调节剂证据。","单一措施难以稳定控倒，需结合遗传、营养、农艺与调节剂并因地制宜。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可结合高通量表型与精准农业构建抗倒伏智能决策模型，实现因地制宜动态调控。","2026-10-13T23:30:19.035054Z"]