[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2029":3,"related-2029":109},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":31,"secondary_topics":37,"classification":38,"search_phrases":82,"slug":85,"view_count":86,"doi":87,"paper":88,"created_at":108},2029,"Radical epistemic change in periurban agrifood systems of the Global South","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904938","In the face of increasingly rapid urbanization, coupled with intensifying ecological degradation, the depletion of natural resources, and changes in lifestyles, periurban areas are experiencing processes of territorial reconfiguration that have serious consequences for social and technological practices, knowledge, and the organization of local communities and indigenous peoples in the Global South. It is estimated that, based on various experiences in urban agroecology and farmers' participation in policies on Urban and Periurban Agriculture (UPA), new agendas related to UPA agroecological transitions, and the transformation of UPA food systems must be defined. However, although the literature describes paradigm shifts in biopolitical spatial relations, economic values, urban metabolism and planning capacity what has come to be known as \"agroecological urbanism\" (Tornaghi and Dehaene, 2020) or urban agroecological socio-natures assemblages (Hammelman et al, 2022), the active role of communities that have historically been rooted in periurban areas remains unrecognized.These sustainable communities and social groups, organized around their local social, cultural, and environmental values, with their diverse forms of self-governance, cooperative organization, and autonomous administrations, participate effectively in economic, political, and social networks to promote and strengthen productive systems for self-sufficiency and the comprehensive stewardship of their territories.Our Opinion article argues that the example of radical epistemologies expressed within the framework of an Andean-Amazonian indigenous conceptualization of \"good living\" or \"sumak kawsay\", an analysis of the reciprocal practices, behaviors, and rituals of these communities, reveals cosmological limits to growth, insofar as there are normative restrictions that prevent harm to the Living Worldrestrictions that arise from relational ontologies that integrate human beings into the natural world (Ritcher, 2025;Díaz et al., 2015;Zimmerer, 2012). This, in turn, facilitates the generation and appropriation of collective surpluses for their own benefit, strengthening their community, while reinforcing autonomy.These radical epistemologies and their underlying cosmovisions are leading to changes in the ways in which food is produced and distributed, some of them implying alongside various forms of reconfiguration of market structures -or at least of what is traditionally understood as the market from the conventional logic of capitalism. Many periurban food systems in the Global South, we have moved from a structure of supply and demand dominated by large transnational corporations to a new form of market governed by alternative principles, in that food markets are not structured around the objective of 'profit' but rather by the primacy of 'solidarity' -understood as an exchange that seeks to restore and guarantee symmetry and equality in trade. For instance, in Mexico there are several initiatives in which traditional and agroecological farming contribute to the emergence and functioning of alternative markets (1. Agro-Food Initiatives of the Popular, Social, and Solidarity Economy {Iniciativas Agroalimentarias de Economia Popular Social y Solidarias, IAEPSS}, which brings together alternative organizations and collectives in response to the demand for agroecological and organic foods from health-conscious consumers, and 2. Eco-Solidarity Food Networks {Redes Alimentarias Ecosolidarias, REDAL}, which includes a digital platform and a mobile application) (Solís-Perez, et al., 2026). From the perspective of these new initiatives, the conventional concept of the 'market' becomes anachronistic or outdated, which is a promising issue.In this Opinion piece, we explore, the transitions taking place within the framework of traditional agriculture and agroecology in periurban areas from the perspective of radical ecological economics (REE). REE is focused on the close relationship between societies, and their environment contributes to the well-being and prosperity of the human and non-human parts of the complex environment on which both depend (Barkin et al., 2026;Barkin, 2026;Hermann, 2025.). REE guides the main arguments in this Opinion piece since under this framework it may be analyzed distinct trajectories of agrifood change in periurban areas that are spatial, environmental, and socioeconomic interfaces where particular pressures and tensions happen (i.e., the confrontation between urbanization and agricultural production). These interfaces incorporate the main contributions of communities and rural populations to local transition efforts, particularly where shared values, perceptions, and trust intersect with broader local and regional political and power dynamics stemming from traditional agriculture and agroecology, which stimulate the creation of alternative markets. This kind of markets may be defined by their characteristics, such as ease of implementation, the ability to revitalize local economies, a contribution to food culture and the revival of traditional foods and production methods, the promotion of social and geographic proximity between producers and consumers, as well as the potential to bring urban and rural communities together in spaces for interaction and commercial exchange (García et al., 2021). The argument highlights the epistemological challenges and institutional actions of the REE in defending the strategic value of these two types of agriculture in the regional development transition, alongside the recovery and strengthening of autonomy, resilience, and priorities driven by local communities and indigenous populations in the Global South.Various global challenges (e.g., climate change) are being intensified by a cascade of risks of irreversible tipping points in Earth systems, which require more than just incremental responses; collective action, cultural change, and a shared purpose are needed to steer exponential transformations across society (Andrade et al., 2026). In the Global South, most periurban areas are characterized by a mix of land uses and intense competition between agricultural and non-agricultural uses. Rapid urbanization in these areas leads to changes in land tenure, social and economic differentiation among residents, and shifts in the management and conservation of regional ecosystems. In periurban areas, a wide variety of agri-food systems can be identified, most of which are undergoing changes that could define them as hybrid systems, combining traditional (typically rural), emerging, and informal systems, as well as others that are expanding (Marshall et al., 2021). However, in areas undergoing urbanization at the expense of rural areas with a high concentration of traditional ancestral communities, a variety of agri-food systems managed by local and\u002For indigenous farmers are present, primarily in the Global South. In these periurban agri-food systems, various transformations are reconfiguring the set of activities, actors, outcomes, and relationships (dynamics) within the food system itself (Juri et al., 2024). As with global food systems, a fundamental challenge of these transformations lies in seeking a balance between increasing production to meet family, community, or regional periurban demands while simultaneously seeking to conserve the quality and quantity of natural resources, soil, and biodiversity as well as the socio-metabolic balance throughout the ecosystems in order to ensure sustainable production and consumption processes.However, despite the broad conceptual framework for assessing the complex interconnections of agrifood systems (Woodhill et al., 2025), and the distinctive regional changes along the periurban interface-such as declining agricultural production linked to local landscape dynamics-applications of the urban-rural nexus in policy design and decision-making remain lacking, particularly when regional and local dynamics are taken into account. It is estimated that in every country of the Global South there are significant obstacles to adapting the \"Nexus approach\" to the changing trends of regional agri-food systems (Torres-Lima et al., 2022); this is due to the lack of tools to translate conceptual and methodological frameworks into concrete outcomes for local agri-food production processes. For example, despite the vast body of knowledge generated over the past 35 years regarding traditional agricultural systems and agroecological practices -which demonstrate their relevance in contributing to increased agricultural production and food security-there are still links to work on between agroecological knowledge and farmers' practices (González-Chang et al. 2020;Wang and He, 2026).In this regard, in most periurban areas worldwide, particularly in the Global South, traditional agrifood systems remain dominant. Periurban agri-food production processes of a regional and local nature are quite variable in terms of sustainability characteristics (Zimmerer et al., 2026), such as efficiency in the use of natural resources, the conservation of environmental assets and services, the protection and strengthening of rural livelihoods, and the generation of local knowledge (Torres-Lima et al., 2022), to support ecological functions fundamental to the reproduction of urban life. For example, in addition to safeguarding biocultural territories and community-based forms of environmental management, the protection of periurban spaces and their productive systems can contribute to aquifer recharge, climate regulation, and the conservation of ecological corridors to counteract the destructive dynamics inherent in the expansion of hyper-urbanized cities. In direct dialogue with traditional agricultural systems, agroecology offers an approach to sustainable food systems that integrates science, practice, and social movements, aligns with food sovereignty, serves as a platform for knowledge co-production blending traditional knowledge and modern ecology, and promotes continuous transformation for socio-natural entanglements in urban agrifood systems: a shift toward a food system that reinforces the ecological and social principles and values of people and place, and prioritizes bottom-up governance and community-centered action (Hammelman et al., 2022;Giraldo, 2024;Temmer et al., 2025;Wang and He, 2026).Currently, periurban agri-food systems are undergoing three critical processes of change: a) an intense competition for land-that is, the spatial, environmental, and socioeconomic pressures and tensions in these regions resulting from the clash between urbanization and agricultural production (Torres-Lima and Madrigal-Gómez, 2025); b) socioeconomic differentiation resulting from gentrification and exclusion processes that affect all segments of society; and c) changes in the urban metabolism that transforms the flows of food, waste, and energy between urban and rural areas. In contrast, resilient trajectories in these areas are underpinned by community-based sustainability initiatives that include three elements for their success: 1) traditional agriculture (for instance, which maintains cultivated biodiversity, local knowledge, and community social organization); 2) agroecological markets, which are direct-sales spaces that restore fair prices and social recognition for agricultural labor; and 3) new governance models with participatory guarantee systems, cooperatives, including various forms of producer-consumer assemblies.As part of the development of new, relevant approaches for understanding the management of periurban agri-food systems for making priority decisions aimed at sustainable development, it is necessary to explore the structural complexity of the nexus between urban and rural societies. This nexus will highlight the potential synergies between sectors, within an integrated analytical framework to counteract the profound socio-ecological imbalances challenging periurban societies worldwide. As part of the examination of radically different social and ecological approaches to promote sustainable societies, it is important to understand and integrate grassroots community initiatives involved in the construction of periurban alternatives, as represented by the knowledge framework of radical ecological economics (REE). From the perspective of REE, the role of community members in reviving traditional knowledge and engaging in dialogue with scientific knowledge strengthens activities to care and restore their periurban ecosystems and agri-food systems. These productive alternatives are facilitating processes of social and ecological transformation, as well as the reduction and repair of socio-metabolic fractures, many of which were inherited from the agro-industrial model. For example, in some periurban areas of the Global South, communities are resisting and correcting these metabolic ruptures-that is, the disconnect between rural and urban areas-by strengthening effective and efficient technological and technical practices for food production and supply, local water management, integrated forest management, and other needs, without rejecting innovations and always within the framework of social inclusion and population well-being (Fantini, 2023;Lakshmi et al., 2024).Within the periurban context of the revitalization of traditional agriculture and agroecology, the REE views both approaches as transformative alternatives for local communities. In various parts of the world, within the framework of linking sustainability and new governance models for periurban development, diverse community members living in these areas are promoting efforts toward transition and change that enable their well-being and the strengthening of their political and community capacity through agri-food production governance practices that prioritize both community and individual wellbeing, based on relational, pluralistic, and ecocentric worldviews (Barkin et al., 2026). These processes of transformation in agri-food systems are highly complex (Woodhill et al., 2025). A critical factor is the effective participation of stakeholders, especially smallholder farmers, for example through the co-creation of knowledge-including what is known as traditional, indigenous, or local knowledge-alongside scientific, Western, or mainstream knowledge (Rosado-May et al., 2025).To the extent that the current conditions of periurban food systems and the culture driving the decisions and actions of local agricultural producers-as reflected in the design and management of these systems-are understood, it will be possible to outline periurban strategies and pathways for change that generate the use of agricultural systems and practices that can be considered sustainable and, at the same time, develop appropriate ways to sustain and increase food production in the face of the challenges posed by local and regional markets. These challenges can be met, for example, through the creation of alternative periurban agroecological markets, the marketing of surpluses is driven by local and solidarity-based markets that reflect values and principles such as health care and support for local producers-principles absent from the logic of the conventional market, where profit is the primary objective (Camacho, et al., 2022).The agenda for innovation and strengthening of periurban alternative markets may include the following considerations: 1) Shortening supply chains. Unlike conventional long supply chains, alternative markets establish direct connections between producers and consumers; 2) Closing local metabolic cycles. Some traditional agricultural systems represent examples of closed social metabolism (e.g., wetland systems (i.e., chinampas in Mexico), as Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), which are considered the most intensive pre-Hispanic agricultural systems still present in Mexico today due to their extraordinary fertility and productivity); 3) Making agricultural labor visible. Alternative markets function as meeting places where knowledge is exchanged between marginalized producers and urban consumers; and 4) Recovery of knowledge and biodiversity. For instance, fairs featuring various crops (i.e., corn, beans, potatoes, etc.) and organic farmers' markets represent the revitalization of ritual activities that strengthen eroded community ties, providing dignity and meaning to communal life. Finally, in terms of institutional arrangements or governance mechanisms that could support new agendas for agroecological transitions and the transformation of periurban agrifood systems of the Global South, we identify some that should be related to strength to participatory governance capacities, such as: a) creation of local-regional productive networks of credit, supply and marketing; b) co-production of agroecological knowledge and technologies; c) creation of public mechanisms and economic instruments of environmental compensation by periurban agrifood systems; d) citizenship or awareness of natural heritage and regional sustainable development planning; and e) plural mechanisms for evaluating government engagement in alternative markets.High-priority sustainability pathways based on community-led initiatives, such as the integration of agroecological food markets and traditional agriculture, as well as new governance models for periurban development are essential. They require the development, as suggested by the REE approach, participatory research processes and pathways, co-creation of knowledge, policies, and the strengthening of adaptive capacities to processes of urban change and transformation that deepen the agenda by focusing on the strengthening of organizational, participatory, and governance structures.These measures can enable the formulation of innovative technical alternatives for agroecological marketing, as well as enhancing the management capacity of local periurban social groups.","面对日益迅速的城市化，加之生态退化加剧、自然资源枯竭以及生活方式的变化，城郊地区正经历领土重构过程，这对全球南方的社会与技术实践、知识以及地方社区和原住民的组 织方式产生了严重后果。据估计，基于城市农业生态学方面的各种经验以及农民对城市与城郊农业（UPA）政策的参与，必须界定与UPA农业生态转型相关的新议程，以及UPA食物系统的转型。然而，尽管文献描述了生物政治空间关系、经济价值、城市代谢和规划能力方面的范式转变——即所谓的“农业生态城市主义”（Tornaghi and Dehaene, 2020）或城市农业生态社会-自然 assemblage（Hammelman et al, 2022）——但历史上扎根于城郊地区的社区的能动作用仍未得到承认。这些可持续社区和社会群体围绕其地方社会、文化和环境价值组织起来，以其多样化的自治形式、合作组织和自主管理，有效参与经济、政治和社会网络，以促进和加强自给自足的生产系统及其领土的综合管护。本观点文章认为，在安第斯-亚马逊原住民“美好生活”或“sumak kawsay”概念框架内所表达的激进认识论范例，以及对这些社区互惠实践、行为和仪式的分析，揭示了增长的本体论限度，因为存在防止伤害生命世界的规范性限制——这些限制源于将人类整合入自然世界的关系本体论（Ritcher, 2025; Díaz et al., 2015; Zimmerer, 2012）。这反过来促进了集体剩余的生成和占有以造福自身，强化其社区，同时增强自主性。这些激进认识论及其背后的宇宙观正在引领食物生产和分配方式的变革，其中一些变革意味着伴随市场结构的各种重构形式——或至少是传统上被理解为市场的那些结构。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-09T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,63,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":17,"relevant":21,"comment":22},8,18,16,13,1,"观点型论文，从激进生态经济学视角讨论全球南方城郊农业食物系统的认识论转型与替代市场实践，理论新颖但偏学术思辨，对国内农业信息化实践的直接参考价值有限。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"都市农业","食物主权","农业生态学","替代食物网络","全球南方",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":42},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":43,"agricultural_evidence":45},[44,51,58,64,70,76],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":50},true,[],[48,33,49],"农业生态","agroecology",[28],{"code":52,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":54,"abstract":55,"tags":57},"A3",3,[],[56],"corn",[],{"code":59,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":60,"abstract":61,"tags":63},"A8",[],[62],"food security",[],{"code":65,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":66,"abstract":67,"tags":69},"G2",[],[68],"smallholder",[],{"code":71,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":72,"abstract":73,"tags":75},"H2",[],[74],"soil",[],{"code":77,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":78,"abstract":79,"tags":81},"H7",[],[80],"climate change",[],[83,84],"替代食物网络 农业生态学 全球南方 都市农业","替代食物网络 农业生态学","替代食物网络农业生态学全球南方都市农业-2029",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904938",{"doi":87,"openalex_id":89,"authors":90,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":100,"card":101,"direction":105,"ingested_from":107},"W7211998620",[91,93,95,98],{"name":92,"orcid":9},"Pablo Torres-Lima",{"name":94,"orcid":9},"David Barkin",{"name":96,"orcid":97},"Erika Carcaño","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4097-0891",{"name":99,"orcid":9},"Claudia Caballero","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904938\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":102,"method":103,"finding":104,"direction":105,"opportunity":106},"主张南半球城郊农业食品系统应纳入原住民激进认识论与美好生活观。","基于安第斯-亚马逊原住民sumak kawsay概念与互惠实践的理论分析。","原住民社区自治理与关系本体论能限制增长、强化自主并重塑食物生产分配。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将原住民地方知识与数字治理工具结合，研究城郊农业自主治理的信息化支撑路径。","openalex","2026-09-10T23:30:07.246020Z",{"total":110,"page":21,"page_size":110,"items":111},6,[112,188,248,338,408,473],{"id":113,"title":114,"url":115,"summary":116,"summary_zh":117,"content":9,"source_name":118,"source_url":115,"published_at":119,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":120,"score_detail":121,"sources":124,"tags":126,"primary_topic":131,"secondary_topics":132,"classification":137,"search_phrases":158,"slug":161,"view_count":21,"doi":162,"paper":163,"created_at":187},5163,"Ecological indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem responses to climate change in agroecology and nature-based solutions: a scoping review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685","Climate change reshapes biodiversity patterns and ecosystem processes across scales. However, ecological indicators used to track these changes remain uneven in structure and application. This study maps and synthesizes indicators applied in agroecology and nature-based solutions (NbS) for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem responses under climate change. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering literature from 2003 to 2026. From a final dataset of 89 sources, data were extracted through a structured coding framework and synthesized using an Indicator–Scale–Response matrix and an Indicator Application Index. Findings show shared reliance on indicators such as species diversity, ecosystem productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services, and resilience. Differences emerge in how these indicators are applied. Agroecology prioritizes process-based and field-level measurements grounded in local ecological interactions, while NbS emphasizes standardized and scalable metrics linked to monitoring and reporting systems. Cross-scale integration remains uneven, particularly in connecting species-level responses with ecosystem and landscape indicators. Remote sensing and Essential Biodiversity Variables provide emerging pathways for linking scales, though field integration remains partial. Results point to fragmented indicator systems that limit coherent ecological assessment across management contexts. Strengthening alignment between field observations and scalable monitoring approaches could improve comparability and usability of ecological indicators for climate adaptation and ecosystem management in agricultural landscapes.","气候变化重塑了跨尺度的生物多样性模式与生态系统过程。然而，用于追踪这些变化的生态指标在结构和应用上仍不均衡。本研究梳理并综合了农业生态学与基于自然的解决方案（NbS）中用于评估气候变化下生物多样性与生态系统响应的指标。采用PRISMA-ScR指南开展范围综述，检索Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar，覆盖2003年至2026年的文献。从最终89篇文献构成的数据集中，通过结构化编码框架提取数据，并运用“指标—尺度—响应”矩阵和指标应用指数进行综合。研究结果表明，各领域共同依赖物种多样性、生态系统生产力、碳动态、生态系统服务和恢复力等指标，但在指标应用方式上存在差异。农业生态学侧重于基于过程和田块尺度的测量，根植于地方生态相互作用；而NbS强调与监测和报告体系相关联的标准化、可扩展的度量指标。跨尺度整合仍不均衡，尤其是在将物种层面响应与生态系统及景观指标相衔接方面。遥感与基本生物多样性变量（Essential Biodiversity Variables）为连接尺度提供了新兴路径，但野外观测的整合仍不充分。研究结果揭示出指标体系的碎片化，限制了跨管理情境下一致的生态评估。加强野外观测与可扩展监测方法之间的衔接，有望提升生态指标在农业景观气候适应与生态系统管理中的可比性和可用性。","Ecological Indicators","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",64,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":122,"relevant":21,"comment":123},9,"该综述系统梳理了农业生态学与NbS中生物多样性及生态系统响应的指标，方法规范、结论有参考价值，但属学术综述，产业与政策影响有限，适合作为专业资讯而非每日精选头条。",[125],{"name":118,"url":115},[127,128,28,129,130],"气候变化","生物多样性","基于自然的解决方案","生态指标",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[133],{"code":77,"slug":134,"name":135,"path":136,"parent_code":36},"climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":138},{"candidates":139,"agricultural_evidence":45},[140,146,151],{"code":32,"score":141,"supported":45,"title":142,"abstract":143,"tags":145},27,[33,49],[128,48,144,33,49],"生态系统服务",[28,128],{"code":77,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":147,"abstract":148,"tags":150},[80],[127,149,80],"气候适应",[127],{"code":152,"score":110,"supported":45,"title":153,"abstract":154,"tags":157},"I3",[],[155,156],"遥感","remote sensing",[],[159,160],"基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学 生物多样性 气候变化","基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案农业生态学生物多样性气候变化-5163","10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685",{"doi":162,"openalex_id":164,"authors":165,"venue":118,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":115,"card":180,"direction":186,"ingested_from":107},"W7222588017",[166,169,172,175,177],{"name":167,"orcid":168},"Eliakira Kisetu Nassary","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7327-4366",{"name":170,"orcid":171},"Mawazo Jamson Shitindi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5579-902X",{"name":173,"orcid":174},"Aneth Japhet Magubika","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8910-1953",{"name":176,"orcid":9},"Esta Alfred Mhagama",{"name":178,"orcid":179},"Newton Lwiyiso Kilasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4721-7691",{"tldr":181,"method":182,"finding":183,"direction":184,"opportunity":185},"综述农业生态与NbS中生物多样性和生态系统气候响应指标的应用差异。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，检索2003-2026年89篇文献，构建指标-尺度","两类领域指标依赖相似但应用分化，跨尺度整合不足，指标系统碎片化。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究田间观测与遥感EBV衔接的跨尺度指标框架，提升农业景观气候适应评估可比性。","农业遥感与作物表型","2026-10-17T23:30:28.181936Z",{"id":189,"title":190,"url":191,"summary":192,"summary_zh":193,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":191,"published_at":194,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":195,"sources":197,"tags":199,"primary_topic":204,"secondary_topics":205,"classification":206,"search_phrases":214,"slug":217,"view_count":86,"doi":218,"paper":219,"created_at":247},4415,"Collaborative networks and an innovative educational design in an agroecology program: the PIES AGILES experience in Mexico","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882766","This study analyzes the experience of the Interinstitutional Specialty Program in Food Sovereignties and Strategic Local Advocacy Management (PIES AGILES) (2021–2023), that facilitated the education and training of close to 300 students from 18 Mexican states. This experience emerged amidst political-institutional disputes and demands from social movements, subsequently joining an academic initiative to develop national specialty programs. The program’s goal was to strengthen community capacities and scale agroecological practices through a participatory educational design. However, it’s necessary to deepen systematic reflections in order to provide feedback and improve the educational process we are driving, with the following research question: How does this educational program contribute to the visibility, emergence, and strengthening of networks aimed at building community capacities and scaling agroecological processes? We adopted a methodology based on the analysis of collaborative networks, drawing on both theoretical foundations and the experience. Our findings indicate that cooperation involving a diverse array of allies, such as social organizations, universities, and research centers, generated multiple connections through heterogeneous learning communities. These learning communities strengthened the educational process, including achievements, reinvention processes, and challenges alike. This approach highlights the visibility of transformative subjects, educational innovation, and agroecological experiences, proposing how situated educational processes can contribute to strengthening collaborative networks and scaling transformative agroecological practices.","本研究分析了“粮食主权与地方战略倡导管理跨机构专业项目”（PIES AGILES）（2021—2023年）的经验，该项目为来自墨西哥18个州的近300名学生提供了教育和培训。这一经验诞生于政治—制度争议和社会运动诉求之中，随后加入了一项学术倡议，以发展国家专业项目。该项目旨在通过参与式教育设计，强化社区能力并推广农业生态实践。然而，有必要深化系统性反思，以反馈并改进我们正在推动的教育过程，研究问题如下：这一教育项目如何促进旨在构建社区能力和推广农业生态过程的网络的可见性、涌现与强化？我们采用了基于协作网络分析的方法论，兼顾理论基础与实践经验。研究发现表明，涉及社会组织、大学和研究中心等多元盟友的合作，通过异质性学习共同体产生了多重连接。这些学习共同体强化了教育过程，包括成就、再创造过程以及挑战。这一路径凸显了变革性主体、教育创新和农业生态经验的可见性，并提出了情境化教育过程如何有助于强化协作网络和推广变革性农业生态实践。","2026-10-07T00:00:00Z",{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":17,"relevant":21,"comment":196},"该研究基于墨西哥农业生态学项目的实证分析，方法新颖、数据规模较大，但影响范围限于区域教育实践，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限。",[198],{"name":10,"url":191},[28,200,201,202,203],"参与式教育","协作网络","墨西哥","社区能力建设",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":207},{"candidates":208,"agricultural_evidence":45},[209],{"code":32,"score":210,"supported":45,"title":211,"abstract":212,"tags":213},12,[49],[48],[28],[215,216],"PIES AGILES 墨西哥","农业生态学 教育 协作网络","PIESAGILES墨西哥-4415","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882766",{"doi":218,"openalex_id":220,"authors":221,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":241,"card":242,"direction":105,"ingested_from":107},"W7220862524",[222,224,226,229,231,234,236,239],{"name":223,"orcid":9},"Olga Domené-Painenao",{"name":225,"orcid":9},"Teresita Santiago Vera",{"name":227,"orcid":228},"León Felipe De la Mora Estrada","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3310-7608",{"name":230,"orcid":9},"Alan Heinze",{"name":232,"orcid":233},"Georgina Alethia Sánchez-Reyes","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0716-9760",{"name":235,"orcid":9},"Sergio Pérez-Landero",{"name":237,"orcid":238},"Diana Ayala Montejo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9827-0575",{"name":240,"orcid":9},"Anne Gschaedler","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882766\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":243,"method":244,"finding":245,"direction":105,"opportunity":246},"分析墨西哥PIES AGILES农业生态专业项目如何通过协作网络培养社区能力并推广农业生态实践。","基于协作网络分析，结合2021-2023年18州近300名学生的参与式教育经验。","多元盟友合作形成异质学习社区，强化教育过程并推动农业生态实践规模化。","可探索数字平台如何支撑此类协作学习网络，提升农业生态知识共享与社区能力建设效率。","2026-10-08T23:30:07.596553Z",{"id":249,"title":250,"url":251,"summary":252,"summary_zh":253,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":251,"published_at":254,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":255,"score_detail":256,"sources":259,"tags":261,"primary_topic":266,"secondary_topics":271,"classification":273,"search_phrases":309,"slug":312,"view_count":53,"doi":313,"paper":314,"created_at":337},3268,"Integrating agrarian differentiation and labor mobility into TAPE-based assessments of agroecology. A methodological exploration in the Cambodian rice sector","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940600","Agroecology is increasingly considered to be a promising pathway to more sustainable agriculture. The Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE) is a multiscale interdisciplinary assessment framework that helps tackle the complexity of such transitions. We critically engaged with TAPE and explored ways to enhance the approach based on empirical case studies conducted in Cambodia, in two rice-based agricultural landscapes with contrasted degrees of agricultural intensification. We complemented the TAPE framework by clarifying and operationalizing perspectives on the political-economic dynamics of agrarian change, including the reconstruction of agrarian history, a farming-system typology based on the distribution of land, and other assets and explicit consideration of off-farm work and migration. We then assessed TAPE at the local level, using focus group discussions with farmers’ collectives, in-depth household surveys, and interviews with village authorities and public administration at the local and provincial levels. The study helped frame agroecological performance from the perspective of the recent agrarian dynamics that have emerged in each area and have largely favored conventional agriculture models that rely on synthetic agro-chemicals and mechanization to achieve higher production and exports. This modernization pathway has unfolded in both landscapes and has resulted in rapid differentiation between smallholder farming households in terms of asset structure and labor processes. Our approach provides a basis for understanding why farmers’ production logic, constraints, and opportunities to engage time and resources in more sustainable farming practices vary considerably between and within landscapes. We argue that enriching the TAPE approach with such political-economic questions of agrarian changes makes it possible to link scales and to understand how agrarian modernization intersects with transition to agroecology. We see it as an important component for tailoring meaningful policies and practices that embrace the daily labor realities of smallholder farming households.","农业生态学日益被视为通往更可持续农业的一条有前景的路径。农业生态绩效评估工具（Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation, TAPE）是一个多尺度、跨学科的评估框架，有助于应对此类转型的复杂性。我们以批判性的态度参与TAPE，并基于在柬埔寨两个水稻农业景观中开展的实证案例研究——这两个景观的农业集约化程度形成鲜明对比——探索改进该方法的途径。我们通过澄清并操作化关于农业变革的政治经济动态的视角，对TAPE框架进行了补充，包括重建农业历史、基于土地及其他资产分布的耕作系统类型学，以及明确考虑非农就业与迁移。随后，我们在地方层面评估了TAPE，采用的方法包括与农民集体的焦点小组讨论、深入的农户调查，以及对村级权威机构和地方及省级公共行政部门的访谈。该研究有助于从各区域近期出现的农业动态视角来构建农业生态绩效的框架，而这些动态在很大程度上有利于依赖合成农用化学品和机械化以实现更高产量和出口的传统农业模式。这一现代化路径在两个景观中均已展开，并导致小农家庭在资产结构和劳动过程方面迅速分化。我们的方法为理解为何农民的生产逻辑、约束条件以及投入时间和资源参与更可持续农业实践的机会在景观之间和景观内部存在显著差异提供了基础。我们认为，以此类关于农业变革的政治经济问题来丰富TAPE方法，使得连接不同尺度并理解农业现代化如何与农业生态转型相交成为可能。我们将其视为制定有意义且能包容小农家庭日常劳动现实的政策与实践的重要组成部分。","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z",69,{"impact":17,"substance":257,"depth":18,"authority":20,"freshness":122,"relevant":21,"comment":258},21,"基于柬埔寨水稻区的实证方法探索，对农业生态评估框架有实质改进，但属区域性学术研究，公共影响有限。",[260],{"name":10,"url":251},[262,263,28,264,265],"水稻","小农经济","柬埔寨","农业劳动力",{"code":267,"slug":268,"name":262,"path":269,"parent_code":270},"A1","rice","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Frice","A",[272],{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":274},{"candidates":275,"agricultural_evidence":45},[276,281,285,292,297,303],{"code":267,"score":277,"supported":45,"title":278,"abstract":279,"tags":280},15,[268],[262,268],[262],{"code":32,"score":277,"supported":45,"title":282,"abstract":283,"tags":284},[49],[48,49],[28],{"code":286,"score":110,"supported":45,"title":287,"abstract":288,"tags":291},"H8",[],[289,290],"可持续农业","sustainable agriculture",[],{"code":65,"score":293,"supported":45,"title":294,"abstract":295,"tags":296},4,[],[68],[263],{"code":298,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":299,"abstract":300,"tags":302},"F5",[],[301],"机械化",[],{"code":304,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":308},"J2",[],[307],"农业现代化",[],[310,311],"TAPE 农业生态评估 柬埔寨 水稻","农业劳动力 农业生态学 小农经济 柬埔寨","TAPE农业生态评估柬埔寨水稻-3268","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940600",{"doi":313,"openalex_id":315,"authors":316,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":251,"card":332,"direction":105,"ingested_from":107},"W7214023979",[317,320,323,326,328,330],{"name":318,"orcid":319},"Titouan Filloux","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3577-7368",{"name":321,"orcid":322},"Jean‐Christophe Diepart","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8979-0632",{"name":324,"orcid":325},"Mathilde Sester","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2329-9119",{"name":327,"orcid":9},"Rada Kong",{"name":329,"orcid":9},"Sreymom Sieng",{"name":331,"orcid":9},"Florent Tivet",{"tldr":333,"method":334,"finding":335,"direction":105,"opportunity":336},"将农业分化与劳动力流动纳入TAPE框架，在柬埔寨稻作区做方法学探索。","重构农业史、农户类型学、焦点小组、入户调查与访谈。","农业现代化加剧小农分化，劳动力流动塑造了生态农业转型的差异。","可将政治经济分化变量数字化，构建农户异质性与生态农业转型的评估模型。","2026-09-23T23:30:07.534077Z",{"id":339,"title":340,"url":341,"summary":342,"summary_zh":343,"content":9,"source_name":344,"source_url":341,"published_at":345,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":346,"score_detail":347,"sources":349,"tags":351,"primary_topic":357,"secondary_topics":362,"classification":364,"search_phrases":383,"slug":386,"view_count":86,"doi":387,"paper":388,"created_at":407},5392,"Wetland Loss Associated with Hydro-Agricultural Development in North African Floodplains: Insights from a Historical Cartographic Analysis of the Gharb Plain (Morocco)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fd18100642","Mediterranean floodplain wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural intensification and hydrological modifications. In North Africa, most of these wetlands have been converted to agricultural lands using an extensive ‘drainage–irrigation’ process that has irreversibly degraded them. This study documents this loss through the illustrative example of the Gharb Plain in the northwest of Morocco. The agricultural development process of this plain, initiated in 1927 and only recently completed, is documented by both historical maps and remote sensing data, which we combined to reconstruct the simultaneous wetland decline and agriculture extension. The results reveal a dramatic decline in marshland ecosystems, covering about 88% of the original marshlands in less than one cycle. Several wetlands, including large ones, have entirely disappeared, particularly within the Sebou and Baht river floodplains. To ensure their human occupation, the drainage process and river canalization have been supported by a large program of dam construction upstream of the Gharb Plain. The wetland loss estimate highlights the substantial ecological costs of agricultural intensification and underscores the need for integrated management strategies balancing food production and patrimony conservation. Future research should focus on wetland restoration, ecosystem service assessment, and climate-resilient water management in Mediterranean floodplains.","地中海洪泛平原湿地是最具生产力的生态系统之一，却日益受到农业集约化与水文改造的威胁。在北非，大多数此类湿地已通过大规模的“排水—灌溉”过程被转变为农业用地，并因此遭到不可逆的退化。本研究以摩洛哥西北部加尔卜平原（Gharb Plain）为例，记录了这一丧失过程。该平原的农业开发进程始于1927年，直至近期才告完成，我们结合历史地图与遥感数据，重建了湿地衰退与农业扩张同步发生的过程。结果表明，沼泽生态系统急剧减少，在不到一个周期内约88%的原生沼泽地消失。包括大型湿地在内的多处湿地已完全消失，尤其是在塞布河（Sebou）与巴赫特河（Baht）洪泛平原内。为保障人类占用，排水过程与河流渠化得到了加尔卜平原上游大规模水坝建设计划的支持。湿地丧失的估算凸显了农业集约化所带来的巨大生态代价，并强调需要制定兼顾粮食生产与遗产保护的综合管理策略。未来研究应聚焦于湿地恢复、生态系统服务评估以及地中海洪泛平原的气候韧性水资源管理。","Diversity","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":19,"substance":257,"depth":18,"authority":20,"freshness":17,"relevant":21,"comment":348},"该研究结合历史地图与遥感数据，量化了北非洪泛平原湿地因农业开发而丧失的情况，方法扎实、结论明确，对农业生态与土地管理有参考价值，但属区域性案例研究，公共影响有限。",[350],{"name":344,"url":341},[352,353,354,355,356],"生态修复","遥感监测","灌溉农业","土地利用变化","湿地保护",{"code":358,"slug":359,"name":360,"path":361,"parent_code":36},"H3","irrigation","水资源与灌溉","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Firrigation",[363],{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":365},{"candidates":366,"agricultural_evidence":45},[367,373,378],{"code":358,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":368,"abstract":369,"tags":372},[],[370,371,359],"灌溉","水资源",[354],{"code":32,"score":122,"supported":45,"title":374,"abstract":375,"tags":377},[],[144,376],"ecosystem service",[355,356,352],{"code":152,"score":379,"supported":45,"title":380,"abstract":381,"tags":382},7,[],[155,156],[353],[384,385],"Gharb平原 湿地 遥感","摩洛哥 湿地 灌溉","Gharb平原湿地遥感-5392","10.3390\u002Fd18100642",{"doi":387,"openalex_id":389,"authors":390,"venue":344,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":341,"card":402,"direction":186,"ingested_from":107},"W7222966485",[391,394,396,399],{"name":392,"orcid":393},"Mohamed Dakki","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8042-3972",{"name":395,"orcid":9},"Said El Falah",{"name":397,"orcid":398},"Ibrahim Makrane","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-9201-206X",{"name":400,"orcid":401},"Ismail Mansouri","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3679-6050",{"tldr":403,"method":404,"finding":405,"direction":186,"opportunity":406},"用历史地图与遥感重建摩洛哥Gharb平原1927年以来的湿地丧失与农业扩张过程。","历史地图与遥感数据结合，重建湿地退缩与农田扩张的时空过程。","不到一个开发周期内约88%的原生沼泽消失，大型湿地完全丧失。","可延伸至地中海洪泛平原湿地恢复优先区识别与生态系统服务权衡研究。","2026-10-20T23:30:19.135602Z",{"id":409,"title":410,"url":411,"summary":412,"summary_zh":413,"content":9,"source_name":414,"source_url":411,"published_at":415,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":416,"score_detail":417,"sources":421,"tags":423,"primary_topic":429,"secondary_topics":430,"classification":432,"search_phrases":447,"slug":450,"view_count":86,"doi":451,"paper":452,"created_at":472},5101,"Advances in Cerrado and tropical grassland plant biology – diversity, functioning, resilience and conservation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331","Abstract Background Tropical grasslands and savannas are ancient, highly diverse ecosystems that support important ecological processes, ecosystem services and human livelihoods, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural expansion, altered fire regimes, invasive species and climate change. The Cerrado, the largest savanna-dominated region in the Neotropics, exemplifies both the exceptional biological diversity and vulnerability of tropical open ecosystems. Despite major advances in plant ecology and evolution, important gaps remain in understanding how plants and plant communities respond to environmental change and disturbance. Scope We review recent advances in plant biology in the Cerrado and other tropical grasslands, covering their evolution, vegetation patterns, plant–animal interactions, functional ecology, responses to fire and environmental change, and restoration and conservation. We consider processes from plant traits and physiological responses to community and ecosystem dynamics, examining how environmental and biotic factors shape the diversity, functioning and resilience of tropical grassy ecosystems. Conclusions Recent advances reinforce the value of tropical grasslands as model systems for advancing fundamental plant science while providing knowledge relevant to their conservation and restoration. Future research should better integrate -omics, functional and evolutionary approaches with long-term monitoring, remote sensing and predictive modelling to understand plant responses to climate change, land-use intensification and changing disturbance regimes. Plant research can also contribute to ecosystem restoration, sustainable land management and climate adaptation. Greater recognition of native plant diversity as a resource for sustainable bioeconomies and local livelihoods can further connect biodiversity conservation with societal needs.","摘要 背景 热带草原和稀树草原是古老且高度多样的生态系统，支撑着重要的生态过程、生态系统服务与人类生计，然而它们正日益受到农业扩张、火 regime 改变、入侵物种和气候变化的威胁。塞拉多（Cerrado）是新热带地区最大的以稀树草原为主的区域，集中体现了热带开放生态系统卓越的生物多样性与脆弱性。尽管植物生态学和进化研究已取得重大进展，但在理解植物及植物群落如何响应环境变化和干扰方面仍存在重要空白。 范围 我们综述了塞拉多及其他热带草原植物生物学的最新进展，涵盖其进化、植被格局、植物–动物相互作用、功能生态学、对火和环境变化的响应，以及恢复与保护。我们考察了从植物性状和生理响应到群落和生态系统动态的过程，审视环境和生物因素如何塑造热带草类生态系统的多样性、功能和恢复力。 结论 最新进展强化了热带草原作为推进基础植物科学模型系统的价值，同时提供了与其保护和恢复相关的知识。未来研究应更好地整合组学、功能和进化方法，与长期监测、遥感和预测建模相结合，以理解植物对气候变化、土地利用集约化和干扰 regime 变化的响应。植物研究还可为生态系统恢复、可持续土地管理和气候适应作出贡献。进一步认识本土植物多样性作为可持续生物经济和当地生计资源的价值，可将生物多样性保护与社会需求更紧密地联系起来。","Annals of Botany","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":210,"substance":418,"depth":18,"authority":419,"freshness":17,"relevant":21,"comment":420},20,14,"核心期刊综述，系统梳理热带草原植物多样性、功能与保护研究进展，学术价值高但与国内农业信息化直接关联有限。",[422],{"name":414,"url":411},[424,425,426,427,428],"生态保护","热带草原","稀树草原","植物多样性","退化草地恢复",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[431],{"code":77,"slug":134,"name":135,"path":136,"parent_code":36},{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":433},{"candidates":434,"agricultural_evidence":45},[435,439,443],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":436,"abstract":437,"tags":438},[],[128,144,33],[424],{"code":77,"score":122,"supported":45,"title":440,"abstract":441,"tags":442},[],[127,149,80],[],{"code":152,"score":110,"supported":45,"title":444,"abstract":445,"tags":446},[],[155,156],[],[448,449],"Cerrado 稀树草原 植物生物学","热带草原 植物多样性 保护","Cerrado稀树草原植物生物学-5101","10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331",{"doi":451,"openalex_id":453,"authors":454,"venue":414,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":9,"card":467,"direction":186,"ingested_from":107},"W7222330485",[455,458,461,464],{"name":456,"orcid":457},"Robert G. Miller","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5798-4552",{"name":459,"orcid":460},"Augusto César Franco","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0869-5989",{"name":462,"orcid":463},"Cássia Beatriz Rodrigues Munhoz","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7990-6715",{"name":465,"orcid":466},"Marcelo Fragomeni Simon","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5732-1716",{"tldr":468,"method":469,"finding":470,"direction":186,"opportunity":471},"综述塞拉多及热带草原植物生物学进展，涵盖多样性、功能、恢复力与保护。","文献综述，整合组学、功能与进化方法及长期监测、遥感、预测模型。","热带草原是基础植物科学模型系统，需整合多手段理解植物对环境变化的响应。","将遥感与预测模型用于热带草原植物功能性状监测，填补长期动态与恢复力评估空白。","2026-10-16T23:30:31.368451Z",{"id":474,"title":475,"url":476,"summary":477,"summary_zh":478,"content":9,"source_name":479,"source_url":476,"published_at":415,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":480,"sources":482,"tags":484,"primary_topic":487,"secondary_topics":488,"classification":495,"search_phrases":520,"slug":523,"view_count":86,"doi":524,"paper":525,"created_at":546},5096,"Land Cover Change, Ecosystem Service Implications, and Economy–Land Use Decoupling:","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.14246\u002Firspsd.14.4_186","Land cover change plays a critical role in shaping watershed ecological conditions and supporting regional economic activities. This study analyzes land cover dynamics in the Tiworo Watershed, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, for 2014, 2019, and 2024, and examines their relationship with sectoral economic growth. Remote sensing and GIS were used to map and quantify land cover changes, while sectoral Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) data for agriculture, forestry, and fisheries represented economic performance. Economy–land use interactions were assessed using the Tapio decoupling elasticity index. Economy–land use interactions were assessed using the Tapio decoupling elasticity index as a retrospective empirical measure based on observed changes in land cover and sectoral GRDP over the study periods. The results show increasing sectoral GRDP accompanied by relatively limited changes in dominant land cover classes. Absolute decoupling was observed during 2014–2019, relative decoupling during 2019–2024, and overall absolute decoupling for 2014–2024, indicating that economic growth was not proportionally associated with large-scale land conversion. Spatial analysis reveals localized landscape transformations, including mangrove degradation, settlement expansion, and plantation growth, which signal emerging pressures on environmentally sensitive areas. Although ecosystem services are not directly valued, land cover change is interpreted as an indicator of ecological pressure with implications for provisioning ecosystem services. These findings highlight the importance of integrating land-use monitoring and economic indicators to support adaptive watershed management, spatial planning, and sustainable development.","土地覆盖变化在塑造流域生态状况和支撑区域经济活动方面发挥着关键作用。本研究分析了印度尼西亚东南苏拉威西省蒂沃罗流域（Tiworo Watershed）2014年、2019年和2024年的土地覆盖动态，并考察其与部门经济增长的关系。研究采用遥感和地理信息系统（GIS）对土地覆盖变化进行制图和量化，同时以农业、林业和渔业的部门地区生产总值（GRDP）数据表征经济表现。经济与土地利用的相互作用采用Tapio脱钩弹性指数进行评估，该指数作为基于研究期内观测到的土地覆盖变化和部门GRDP变化的回顾性经验测度。结果表明，部门GRDP持续增长，而主导土地覆盖类型的变化相对有限。2014—2019年呈现绝对脱钩，2019—2024年呈现相对脱钩，2014—2024年整体呈现绝对脱钩，表明经济增长与大规模土地转换之间不存在比例关联。空间分析揭示了局部景观转型，包括红树林退化、居民点扩张和种植园增长，这些信号表明环境敏感区域正面临新兴压力。尽管生态系统服务未被直接估值，但土地覆盖变化被解释为生态压力的指标，并对供给型生态系统服务具有潜在影响。这些发现凸显了整合土地利用监测与经济指标的重要性，以支持适应性流域管理、空间规划和可持续发展。","International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development",{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":17,"relevant":21,"comment":481},"基于遥感与GIS的流域土地利用变化与经济增长脱钩研究，方法规范但属区域案例，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限。",[483],{"name":479,"url":476},[353,355,485,144,486],"流域管理","空间规划",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[489],{"code":490,"slug":491,"name":492,"path":493,"parent_code":494},"I4","gis","GIS与空间分析","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fgis","I",{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":496},{"candidates":497,"agricultural_evidence":45},[498,502,510,514],{"code":32,"score":20,"supported":45,"title":499,"abstract":500,"tags":501},[376],[144],[355,144],{"code":490,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":503,"abstract":504,"tags":509},[],[505,506,507,508],"地理信息","空间分析","GIS","spatial analysis",[486],{"code":152,"score":379,"supported":45,"title":511,"abstract":512,"tags":513},[],[155,156],[353],{"code":515,"score":53,"supported":45,"title":516,"abstract":517,"tags":519},"D",[],[518],"渔业",[],[521,522],"Tiworo流域 土地利用 遥感","Tapio脱钩 农业经济 土地覆盖","Tiworo流域土地利用遥感-5096","10.14246\u002Firspsd.14.4_186",{"doi":524,"openalex_id":526,"authors":527,"venue":479,"cited_by_count":86,"oa_url":540,"card":541,"direction":186,"ingested_from":107},"W7221789653",[528,531,534,537],{"name":529,"orcid":530},"Safril Kasim","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0009-4679-4233",{"name":532,"orcid":533},"Hasddin Hasddin","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0114-5274",{"name":535,"orcid":536},"La Fariki","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-7870-9028",{"name":538,"orcid":539},"Abhishek Agarwal","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0900-6383","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jstage.jst.go.jp\u002Farticle\u002Firspsd\u002F14\u002F4\u002F14_9\u002F_pdf",{"tldr":542,"method":543,"finding":544,"direction":186,"opportunity":545},"分析印尼Tiworo流域2014-2024年土地覆盖变化与部门经济增长的脱钩关系。","遥感与GIS制图，结合GRDP数据和Tapio脱钩弹性指数。","经济持续增长但土地覆盖变化有限，整体呈绝对脱钩，局部红树林退化等生态压力显现。","可将脱钩指数与生态系统服务价值核算结合，量化流域生态压力并支撑空间规划。","2026-10-16T23:30:28.687070Z"]