[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2128":3,"related-2128":107},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":6,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"embedding_ready":15,"score":16,"sources":17,"tags":19,"primary_topic":25,"secondary_topics":31,"search_phrases":38,"slug":41,"view_count":42,"doi":43,"paper":44,"created_at":69,"content":12,"score_detail":70,"classification":78},2128,"The impact of agricultural insurance coverage on farm household income inequality: evidence from corn farmers in Liaoning Province, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1856386","Introduction As climate variability and production uncertainty increasingly threaten agricultural livelihoods, agricultural insurance has become an important tool for climate risk management and farm income stabilization. However, its distributional effects across farm households remain underexplored. Drawing on Sen’s capability approach, this study investigates the impact of agricultural insurance coverage on income inequality among farm households. Methods Using a two-wave panel dataset of 627 corn-growing households in Liaoning Province, China, from 2021 to 2022, we employ a two-way fixed effects model to estimate the effect of agricultural insurance coverage on farm household income inequality. We further test the robustness of the baseline results through a series of checks, including replacing the dependent variable, controlling for village-level fixed effects, adding village-level controls, clustering bootstrap standard errors at the village level and alternative model specifications. Exploratory analysis and heterogeneity analysis are also conducted. Results The empirical results yield four main findings. First, higher agricultural insurance coverage is positively associated with income inequality among farm households, and this pattern remains robust across multiple tests. Second, the observed association with inequality is concentrated in operating income, with no significant corresponding patterns for wage income, property income, or transfer income. Third, exploratory analysis suggests that agricultural insurance coverage is linked to greater land transfer-in primarily for high-income households, a relationship that is consistent with the observed increased income inequality. Fourth, this association is more pronounced among households with greater realized production loss and among those living in areas without income insurance policies. Discussion This study enriches the literature on agricultural insurance by highlighting its unintended distributional consequences. Although agricultural insurance plays an important role in risk management, its potential to widen inequality implies that policy design should not rely on insurance alone. Greater attention to equity requires complementary redistributive instruments, alongside efforts to make insurance more inclusive for disadvantaged farmers.","引言 随着气候变率和生产不确定性日益威胁农业生计，农业保险已成为气候风险管理和稳定农户收入的重要工具。然而，其对不同农户的分配效应仍缺乏充分探讨。本研究基于森的可行能力方法，考察农业保险覆盖对农户收入不平等的影响。方法 使用2021年至2022年中国辽宁省627个玉米种植户的两期面板数据，采用双向固定效应模型估计农业保险覆盖对农户收入不平等的影响。我们进一步通过一系列检验验证基准结果的稳健性，包括替换因变量、控制村级固定效应、加入村级控制变量、在村级聚类自助法标准误以及替代模型设定。同时进行了探索性分析和异质性分析。结果 实证结果得出四个主要发现。第一，较高的农业保险覆盖与农户收入不平等呈正相关，且这一模式在多项检验中保持稳健。第二，观察到的与不平等的关系集中于经营收入，而工资性收入、财产性收入或转移性收入未呈现显著的相应模式。第三，探索性分析表明，农业保险覆盖与高收入农户更多转入土地相关，这一关系与观察到的收入不平等加剧相一致。第四，这种关联在实际生产损失较大的农户以及居住在无收入保险政策地区的农户中更为明显。讨论 本研究通过揭示农业保险的非预期分配后果，丰富了农业保险文献。尽管农业保险在风险管理中发挥重要作用，但其扩大不平等的潜力意味着政策设计不应仅依赖保险。更加关注公平需要 complementary 再分配工具，同时努力使保险对弱势农户更具包容性。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","论文",null,10,false,true,77,[18],{"name":9,"url":6},[20,21,22,23,24],"农业保险","收入不平等","玉米种植","农户收入","土地流转",{"code":26,"slug":27,"name":28,"path":29,"parent_code":30},"A3","maize","玉米","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fmaize","A",[32],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},"G3","rural-finance","农村金融与保险","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-finance","G",[39,40],"收入不平等 农业保险 农户收入 土地流转","收入不平等 农业保险","收入不平等农业保险农户收入土地流转-2128",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1856386",{"doi":43,"openalex_id":45,"authors":46,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":61,"oa_url":6,"card":62,"direction":66,"ingested_from":68},"W7212115989",[47,50,53,56,58],{"name":48,"orcid":49},"Bo Hu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8527-3750",{"name":51,"orcid":52},"Wenbo Zhang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4672-1420",{"name":54,"orcid":55},"Chunli Wan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6027-4869",{"name":57,"orcid":12},"Naihe Jiang",{"name":59,"orcid":60},"Fengjie Xie","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0688-3126",0,{"tldr":63,"method":64,"finding":65,"direction":66,"opportunity":67},"基于辽宁玉米户面板数据，发现农业保险覆盖扩大反而加剧农户收入不平等。","2021-2022年627户两期面板数据，双向固定效应模型及多种稳健性检验。","保险覆盖与收入不平等正相关，主要来自经营收入，高收入户土地转入更多。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究保险与数字信贷、补贴等政策组合对农户收入分配公平性的协同调节机制。","openalex","2026-09-11T23:30:07.758358Z",{"impact":71,"substance":72,"depth":73,"authority":74,"freshness":75,"relevant":76,"comment":77},16,22,18,13,8,1,"基于辽宁627户玉米种植户两期面板数据的实证研究，揭示农业保险覆盖扩大反而加剧农户收入不平等，并指出其通过高收入户土地转入的传导机制，对农业保险政策设计具有重要警示价值。",{"status":79,"locked":14,"version":80,"method":81,"evidence":82},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":83,"agricultural_evidence":15},[84,90,95,102],{"code":26,"score":85,"supported":15,"title":86,"abstract":88,"tags":89},15,[87],"corn",[28,87],[22],{"code":33,"score":85,"supported":15,"title":91,"abstract":93,"tags":94},[92],"agricultural insurance",[20,92],[20],{"code":96,"score":97,"supported":15,"title":98,"abstract":99,"tags":101},"G2",4,[],[100],"land transfer",[24],{"code":103,"score":97,"supported":15,"title":104,"abstract":105,"tags":106},"G6",[],[23],[23],{"total":108,"page":76,"page_size":108,"items":109},6,[110,133,183,205,231,274],{"id":111,"title":112,"url":113,"summary":114,"summary_zh":12,"source_name":115,"source_url":12,"published_at":116,"category":117,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"embedding_ready":15,"score":118,"sources":119,"tags":121,"primary_topic":126,"secondary_topics":127,"search_phrases":128,"slug":131,"view_count":61,"doi":12,"paper":12,"created_at":132},4633,"四川南部县夏玉米吨粮田示范测产亩产625.6公斤 旱年稳产增收","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.nanchong.gov.cn\u002Fnyncj\u002Fxwdt\u002Fxsqdt\u002F202610\u002Ft20261010_2365109.html","10月8日,省作物学会专家组对南部县双佛镇夏玉米高产示范片开展测产验收,选用宜单2061、创世90等夏播玉米品种,集成缩株增密、精量机播、绿色防控、化控防倒、适期机收为核心的玉米四良融合绿色高效种植模式。百千万三级示范片平均亩产分别达582.8公斤、554.5公斤、516.3公斤,新田坝村600亩高产示范片亩产达625.6公斤,在今年7月异常高温情况下增产增收效果显著,为丘陵旱作区大面积单产提升提供可复制可推广模式。","南充市农业农村局 2026-10-10","2026-10-10T00:00:00Z","报道",63,[120],{"name":115,"url":113},[122,123,22,124,125],"全程机械化","旱作农业","良种良法","吨粮田",{"code":26,"slug":27,"name":28,"path":29,"parent_code":30},[],[129,130],"南部县 夏玉米 吨粮田","玉米 四良融合 绿色高效种植","南部县夏玉米吨粮田-4633","2026-10-11T00:09:42.100302Z",{"id":134,"title":135,"url":136,"summary":137,"summary_zh":138,"source_name":9,"source_url":136,"published_at":139,"category":11,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"embedding_ready":15,"score":140,"sources":141,"tags":143,"primary_topic":148,"secondary_topics":149,"search_phrases":156,"slug":159,"view_count":160,"doi":161,"paper":162,"created_at":182},4289,"When climate risk intensifies, does insurance pay off? A community case study of China's agricultural insurance reform","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1954205","In the context of mounting global climate threats, fostering resilience in food production systems has become a critical imperative for upholding national food security. This paper exploits the staggered implementation, beginning in 2018, of China's agricultural insurance reforms covering full production costs and planting income as a quasi-natural experiment. Drawing on provincial panel data from 2013 to 2024, we first develop a multidimensional composite index to capture food production resilience. A staggered difference-in-differences specification is then adopted to systematically assess the causal effect of these reforms on such resilience and to explore the underlying transmission channels. Moreover, from a novel climate change perspective, the analysis examines the heterogeneous treatment effects across varying degrees of climate risk exposure. The empirical findings reveal that the policy-led agricultural insurance reform significantly and robustly enhances China's food production resilience. Mechanism tests indicate that advances in agricultural technology and the expansion of large-scale farming operations serve as important pathways through which the insurance policy takes effect. Further investigation shows that climate change risk positively moderates the policy impact: as climate risk intensifies, the marginal contribution of insurance to resilience becomes stronger. Heterogeneity analysis also demonstrates that the policy effect is more pronounced in western China and in localities with higher rates of disaster-induced losses. Taken together, these results offer solid empirical backing for broadening the pilot programs of full cost and planting income insurance. They also establish a theoretical basis for positioning publicly supported agricultural insurance as an effective instrument for climate change adaptation, providing valuable guidance on strengthening the climate adaptability and resilience of food production to ensure national food security.","在全球气候威胁日益加剧的背景下，增强粮食生产系统的韧性已成为维护国家粮食安全的关键任务。本文以2018年起分阶段实施的中国农业保险覆盖完全生产成本和种植收入的改革为准自然实验，基于2013—2024年省级面板数据，首先构建多维复合指数以刻画粮食生产韧性，继而采用交错双重差分模型系统评估该改革对粮食生产韧性的因果效应并探究其传导机制。此外，本文从气候变化这一新视角出发，考察了不同气候风险暴露程度下的异质性处理效应。实证结果表明，政策主导的农业保险改革显著且稳健地提升了中国粮食生产韧性。机制检验表明，农业技术进步与规模化经营扩张是保险政策发挥作用的重要路径。进一步研究发现，气候变化风险对政策效应具有正向调节作用：随着气候风险加剧，保险对韧性的边际贡献增强。异质性分析还表明，政策效应在中国西部地区以及灾害损失率较高的地区更为显著。综上，上述结果为扩大完全成本保险和种植收入保险试点提供了坚实的经验依据，也为将公共支持的农业保险定位为气候变化适应的有效工具奠定了理论基础，为增强粮食生产的气候适应性与韧性、保障国家粮食安全提供了有价值的政策启示。","2026-10-05T00:00:00Z",88,[142],{"name":9,"url":136},[144,20,145,146,147],"粮食安全","农业政策","气候适应","生产韧性",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[150],{"code":151,"slug":152,"name":153,"path":154,"parent_code":155},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",[157,158],"农业保险改革 粮食生产韧性","完全成本保险 种植收入保险","农业保险改革粮食生产韧性-4289",3,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1954205",{"doi":161,"openalex_id":163,"authors":164,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":61,"oa_url":136,"card":176,"direction":180,"ingested_from":68},"W7220367453",[165,168,170,172,174],{"name":166,"orcid":167},"Changzhe Deng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-0852-5997",{"name":169,"orcid":12},"Maimiao Sun",{"name":171,"orcid":12},"Xueyu Lin",{"name":173,"orcid":12},"Chencan Rao",{"name":175,"orcid":12},"Qiuping Guo",{"tldr":177,"method":178,"finding":179,"direction":180,"opportunity":181},"基于2013-2024省级面板数据，评估中国农业保险改革对粮食生产韧性的因果影响。","多维度韧性指数+交错双重差分，利用2018年起保险改革试点作准自然实验。","保险改革显著提升粮食生产韧性，气候风险越高其边际贡献越强，西部和灾损高地区效果更明显。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究保险改革与农业技术、规模化经营的协同机制，及气候风险下保险产品设计与精准赔付的优化路径。","2026-10-06T23:30:05.886883Z",{"id":184,"title":185,"url":186,"summary":187,"summary_zh":12,"source_name":188,"source_url":12,"published_at":189,"category":190,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":15,"embedding_ready":15,"score":191,"sources":192,"tags":194,"primary_topic":198,"secondary_topics":199,"search_phrases":200,"slug":203,"view_count":76,"doi":12,"paper":12,"created_at":204},4249,"四部门联合印发加快农业保险高质量发展实施方案","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.fengxin.gov.cn\u002Ffxxrmzf\u002Fzfcgxgxx\u002Fpc\u002Fcontent\u002F2104516031187619840\u002Fcontent_2104516031187619840.html","财政部会同农业农村部、金融监管总局、国家林草局联合印发财金〔2026〕88号《关于加快农业保险高质量发展的实施方案》，是我国农业保险近二十年发展经验的提炼。我国农业保险保费规模从2007年52亿元增长到2025年超1550亿元，每年可为上亿户次农户提供风险保障超5万亿元。","奉新县人民政府 转载财政部金融司 2026-10-01","2026-10-01T01:00:00Z","政策",92,[193],{"name":188,"url":186},[144,195,20,196,197],"惠农政策","农业科技投入","风险保障",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],[201,202],"三大粮食作物保险覆盖率 90%","农业科技投入 农业保险 惠农政策 粮食安全","三大粮食作物保险覆盖率90%-4249","2026-10-06T00:04:59.342384Z",{"id":206,"title":207,"url":208,"summary":209,"summary_zh":12,"source_name":210,"source_url":12,"published_at":211,"category":190,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":15,"embedding_ready":15,"score":212,"sources":213,"tags":215,"primary_topic":220,"secondary_topics":224,"search_phrases":226,"slug":229,"view_count":97,"doi":12,"paper":12,"created_at":230},3381,"财政部：2026年农林水支出2.43万亿元，安排2630亿元耕地地力保护补贴、1770亿元常态化帮扶资金","https:\u002F\u002Fczt.xinjiang.gov.cn\u002Fxjczt\u002Fc115020\u002F202609\u002F49f00038d563442fb4cb7d71b4848d93.shtml","国新办'开局起步十五五'系列主题发布会上，财政部表示2026年安排全国一般公共预算农林水支出2.43万亿元、同比增长3.3%。中央财政安排2630亿元稳定实施耕地地力保护补贴、农业保险保费补贴等相关农业补贴政策；常态化帮扶方面已安排下达1770亿元，截至6月底脱贫劳动力就业规模超过3200万人，脱贫县农村居民人均可支配收入增速继续跑赢全国农村平均水平。","国新办发布会\u002F新疆维吾尔自治区财政厅 2026-09-23","2026-09-23T00:00:00Z",91,[214],{"name":210,"url":208},[216,20,217,218,219],"乡村振兴","常态化帮扶","财政支农","耕地地力保护补贴",{"code":103,"slug":221,"name":222,"path":223,"parent_code":37},"rural-integration","帮扶与城乡融合","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-integration",[225],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[227,228],"财政部 农林水支出 2.43万亿","耕地地力保护补贴 2630亿","财政部农林水支出2.43万亿-3381","2026-09-25T00:09:27.146137Z",{"id":232,"title":233,"url":234,"summary":235,"summary_zh":236,"source_name":9,"source_url":234,"published_at":237,"category":11,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"embedding_ready":15,"score":238,"sources":239,"tags":241,"primary_topic":245,"secondary_topics":246,"search_phrases":247,"slug":250,"view_count":97,"doi":251,"paper":252,"created_at":273},3150,"Climate extremes and grain green productivity in China: buffering effects of agricultural insurance and high-standard farmland","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1918373","Extreme climate shocks are increasingly reshaping the sustainability, resilience, and environmental performance of grain production systems, particularly in countries facing the dual challenge of safeguarding food security and accelerating agricultural green transformation. This study investigates how extreme climate risk affects grain green total factor productivity (GGTFP) in China and whether adaptation-oriented policy instruments can mitigate these adverse effects. Using provincial panel data for 31 Chinese regions from 2001 to 2023, we measure GGTFP with a Super-SBM Global Malmquist–Luenberger index that incorporates grain output as the desirable output and carbon emissions and agricultural non-point source pollution as undesirable outputs. We further construct a composite extreme climate risk index based on four types of extreme events: extreme low temperature, extreme high temperature, extreme rainfall, and extreme drought. Econometric estimates show that China’s GGTFP increased by an average of 1.7% annually during the study period, mainly driven by green technological progress. However, extreme climate risk exhibited an overall upward trend and significantly inhibited GGTFP. Among different climate hazards, extreme rainfall and extreme drought had stronger negative effects than extreme temperature events, suggesting that water-related climate shocks are particularly detrimental to green grain production. The adverse impact of extreme climate risk was more pronounced in high-relief regions and non-major grain-producing areas, revealing substantial spatial heterogeneity in climate vulnerability. Further analysis indicates that agricultural insurance and high-standard farmland development both significantly attenuate the negative effect of extreme climate risk on GGTFP, with interaction coefficients of 0.040 and 0.037, respectively. These findings suggest that risk-sharing mechanisms and climate-resilient farmland infrastructure can help stabilize green productivity under increasing climate uncertainty. This study provides empirical evidence on the green productivity consequences of multi-hazard climate risks and highlights the importance of integrating agricultural insurance, farmland infrastructure improvement, food security, and environmental protection into climate-resilient agricultural development strategies.","极端气候冲击正日益重塑粮食生产系统的可持续性、韧性与环境绩效，对于同时面临保障粮食安全和推进农业绿色转型双重挑战的国家而言尤为如此。本研究考察极端气候风险如何影响中国粮食绿色全要素生产率（GGTFP），以及适应性政策工具能否缓解这些不利影响。基于2001—2023年中国31个地区的省级面板数据，我们采用Super-SBM Global Malmquist–Luenberger指数测算GGTFP，该指数将粮食产出作为期望产出，将碳排放和农业面源污染作为非期望产出。我们进一步基于四类极端事件——极端低温、极端高温、极端降雨和极端干旱——构建了综合极端气候风险指数。计量估计表明，研究期间中国GGTFP年均增长1.7%，主要由绿色技术进步驱动。然而，极端气候风险总体呈上升趋势，并显著抑制了GGTFP。在不同气候灾害中，极端降雨和极端干旱的负面影响强于极端温度事件，表明与水相关的气候冲击对绿色粮食生产尤为不利。极端气候风险的不利影响在地形起伏较大的地区和非粮食主产区更为显著，揭示了气候脆弱性存在显著的空间异质性。进一步分析表明，农业保险和高标准农田建设均显著减弱了极端气候风险对GGTFP的负面影响，交互项系数分别为0.040和0.037。这些发现表明，风险分担机制和气候韧性农田基础设施有助于在气候不确定性加剧的背景下稳定绿色生产率。本研究为多灾种气候风险的绿色生产率后果提供了经验证据，并凸显了将农业保险、农田基础设施改善、粮食安全和环境保护纳入气候韧性农业发展战略的重要性。","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z",86,[240],{"name":9,"url":234},[242,144,20,243,244],"高标准农田","绿色生产力","极端气候",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],[248,249],"极端气候 粮食绿色生产率","农业保险 高标准农田 气候适应","极端气候粮食绿色生产率-3150","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1918373",{"doi":251,"openalex_id":253,"authors":254,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":61,"oa_url":234,"card":268,"direction":180,"ingested_from":68},"W7213938600",[255,258,261,263,266],{"name":256,"orcid":257},"Bin Zheng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9984-4136",{"name":259,"orcid":260},"Shuai Hao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7856-0495",{"name":262,"orcid":12},"Junye Zhao",{"name":264,"orcid":265},"Liping Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5729-4984",{"name":267,"orcid":12},"Qian Nie",{"tldr":269,"method":270,"finding":271,"direction":180,"opportunity":272},"研究极端气候风险对中国粮食绿色全要素生产率的影响及农业保险与高标准农田的缓冲作用。","2001-2023年31省面板数据，Super-SBM GML指数测度GGTFP","极端气候风险显著抑制GGTFP，降雨与干旱影响更强；农业保险和高标准农田均显著缓解该负面效应。","可探究农业保险与高标准农田的协同缓冲机制，及其在不同气候风险类型和区域间的异质性优化配置。","2026-09-22T23:30:08.637590Z",{"id":275,"title":276,"url":277,"summary":278,"summary_zh":279,"source_name":9,"source_url":277,"published_at":280,"category":11,"cover_url":12,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"embedding_ready":15,"score":281,"sources":282,"tags":284,"primary_topic":289,"secondary_topics":290,"search_phrases":296,"slug":299,"view_count":160,"doi":300,"paper":301,"created_at":320},3142,"Communication channels for promoting regenerative agricultural practices among maize farmers: preferences and predictors in Ghana’s transitional belt","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960","Agricultural extension, knowledge exchange, behavioural change, and smallholder innovation are fundamental to accelerating sustainable agricultural transformation and strengthening climate-resilient food systems in Africa. Effective knowledge exchange enables farmers to adopt environmentally sustainable practices that improve soil health, enhance productivity, and contribute to food and nutrition security. However, limited evidence exists on how farmers’ communication preferences influence the adoption of regenerative agricultural practices (RAPs). This study examined determinants of maize farmers’ preferred communication channels for receiving RAP information in Ghana’s transitional belt. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 maize farmers selected through a multistage sampling procedure. Data were collected using a structured interview schedule administered to the selected respondents. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multinomial logistic regression. Mass communication emerged as the most preferred channel (38.7%), followed by individual (37.1%) and group communication (24.2%). Despite being the least preferred, group communication was associated with significantly higher adoption of RAPs than mass and individual channels. Communication preferences were significantly influenced by education, sex, farming experience, land ownership, market incentives, location, and farm fragmentation. The findings demonstrate that communication effectiveness depends not only on information access but also on opportunities for interaction, peer learning, and contextualised advisory support. The study recommends integrating mass communication with participatory group-based and targeted interpersonal extension approaches to enhance RAPs adoption. This supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action and SDG 15 [Life on Land]). By linking communication preferences with regenerative agriculture adoption, this study extends agricultural communication theory and provides evidence for designing farmer-centred extension systems that strengthen resilient agricultural and food systems across sub-Saharan Africa.","农业推广、知识交流、行为改变和小农创新是加速非洲可持续农业转型和增强气候韧性粮食系统的根本所在。有效的知识交流使农民能够采用环境可持续的做法，从而改善土壤健康、提高生产力并促进粮食和营养安全。然而，关于农民的沟通偏好如何影响再生农业实践（RAPs）采纳的证据仍然有限。本研究考察了加纳过渡带玉米农民获取再生农业实践信息时首选沟通渠道的决定因素。研究采用多阶段抽样程序选取了385名玉米农民进行横断面调查，使用结构化访谈问卷对选定受访者进行数据收集，并运用描述性统计、单因素方差分析、卡方检验和多项逻辑回归进行数据分析。大众传播是最受青睐的渠道（38.7%），其次是个体传播（37.1%）和群体传播（24.2%）。尽管群体传播最不受青睐，但其与再生农业实践采纳率显著高于大众传播和个体传播相关。沟通偏好受到教育程度、性别、务农经验、土地所有权、市场激励、地理位置和地块分散程度的显著影响。研究结果表明，沟通效果不仅取决于信息获取，还取决于互动机会、同伴学习和情境化咨询服务。研究建议将大众传播与参与式群体方法和有针对性的面对面推广方法相结合，以提高再生农业实践的采纳率。这有助于实现可持续发展目标2（零饥饿）、目标12（负责任消费和生产）、目标13（气候行动）和目标15（陆地生物）。通过将沟通偏好与再生农业采纳相联系，本研究拓展了农业传播理论，并为设计以农民为中心的推广体系提供了依据，以增强撒哈拉以南非洲地区具有韧性的农业和粮食系统。","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z",73,[283],{"name":9,"url":277},[285,286,22,287,288],"加纳","农业推广","再生农业","农户沟通",{"code":26,"slug":27,"name":28,"path":29,"parent_code":30},[291],{"code":292,"slug":293,"name":294,"path":295,"parent_code":155},"H8","sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture",[297,298],"加纳 玉米 农户 沟通渠道","再生农业 推广 加纳","加纳玉米农户沟通渠道-3142","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960",{"doi":300,"openalex_id":302,"authors":303,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":61,"oa_url":277,"card":315,"direction":66,"ingested_from":68},"W7213983148",[304,306,309,312],{"name":305,"orcid":12},"Fred Ankuyi",{"name":307,"orcid":308},"Ernest Laryea Okorley","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1354-7446",{"name":310,"orcid":311},"Fatimah Von Abubakari","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5485-4085",{"name":313,"orcid":314},"Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1657-1409",{"tldr":316,"method":317,"finding":318,"direction":66,"opportunity":319},"研究加纳玉米农获取再生农业信息的渠道偏好及其对采纳的影响。","对385户玉米农问卷调查，用多项逻辑回归等分析。","大众传播最受偏好，但群体传播渠道对应更高的再生农业实践采纳率。","可探索数字工具与群体互动结合的混合推广模式，提升小农再生农业采纳。","2026-09-22T23:30:07.910603Z"]