[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2275":3,"related-2275":83},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":8,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":67,"slug":70,"view_count":71,"doi":8,"paper":72,"created_at":82},2275,"农业技术经济2026(7) 土地流转对农户经济韧性影响:基于\"增收\"和\"增能\"双重视角","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F165652.html","江西财经大学杨头平等基于中国家庭追踪调查数据,从\"增收\"和\"增能\"双重视角检验土地流转对农户经济韧性影响。研究表明土地流转显著提升转入户和转出户经济韧性;农业机械化对转入户经济韧性和家庭总收入具有正向调节作用,农村电子商务对转出户经济韧性和工资性收入具有正向调节作用。",null,"农业技术经济","2026-09-07T16:00:00Z","论文",10,false,77,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":21},18,21,14,6,1,"基于全国性微观调查数据的实证研究，从增收与增能双视角揭示土地流转对农户经济韧性的提升机制，并识别机械化与电商的差异化调节作用，结论可靠、政策参考价值较高。",[23],{"name":9,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"农村电商","农民增收","农业机械化","土地流转","农户经济韧性",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,49,57,62],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":48},12,true,[28],[28],[28],{"code":50,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":52,"abstract":53,"tags":56},"F5",7,[],[54,55],"农业机械","机械化",[27],{"code":58,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":59,"abstract":60,"tags":61},"E5",[],[],[25],{"code":63,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":64,"abstract":65,"tags":66},"G6",[],[],[26],[68,69],"农户经济韧性 农业机械化 农村电商 农民增收","农户经济韧性 农业机械化","农户经济韧性农业机械化农村电商农民增收-2275",3,{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":73,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":8,"card":75,"direction":79,"ingested_from":81},[],0,{"tldr":76,"method":77,"finding":78,"direction":79,"opportunity":80},"基于CFPS数据，从增收和增能双视角检验土地流转对农户经济韧性的影响。","中国家庭追踪调查数据，双重视角实证分析。","土地流转显著提升转入户和转出户经济韧性；机械化与电商分别正向调节转入户和转出户。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探究电商与机械化等数字要素如何协同土地流转，提升不同农户经济韧性的机制。","agent","2026-09-13T00:04:05.375540Z",{"total":19,"page":20,"page_size":19,"items":84},[85,156,219,274,333,389],{"id":86,"title":87,"url":88,"summary":89,"summary_zh":90,"content":8,"source_name":91,"source_url":88,"published_at":92,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":93,"score_detail":94,"sources":99,"tags":101,"primary_topic":106,"secondary_topics":107,"classification":108,"search_phrases":133,"slug":136,"view_count":74,"doi":137,"paper":138,"created_at":155},5368,"The enabling effect of farmers’ cooperatives on the rural collective economy: evidence from China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166","Based on panel data from 30 provinces in China covering the period 2015–2023, this paper examines the impact of farmers’ cooperatives on the rural collective economy and the underlying mechanisms. First, a multidimensional evaluation system is constructed to measure the development levels of farmers’ cooperatives and the rural collective economy. Subsequently, baseline regressions are estimated using a two-way fixed-effects model and the instrumental variables approach, while the underlying mechanisms are systematically identified through moderating-effect models, threshold-effect models, spatial econometric models, and dimension-specific tests. The results indicate that, during the study period, the overall development levels of China’s farmers’ cooperatives and the rural collective economy showed distinct temporal evolutionary characteristics. Specifically, the overall development level of farmers’ cooperatives declined slightly, while the rural collective economy maintained steady growth. Baseline regression results show that the development of farmers’ cooperatives has a significant positive promotional effect on the rural collective economy, and this conclusion remains robust after multiple robustness tests and endogeneity treatments. Mechanism analysis reveals that cooperatives primarily exert their empowering effect through two channels: improving operational performance and promoting industrial upgrading, whereas their effects in dimensions such as standardized operation and service scope are not significant. Heterogeneity tests confirm that this promotional effect exhibits marked regional differentiation, being significant only in the eastern regions and not yet manifested in the central and western regions. Further analysis indicates that the agricultural industry growth rate plays a positive moderating role in the process by which cooperatives empower the collective economy; the level of land transfer exhibits a single-threshold effect, with the cooperative’s promotional effect strengthening significantly once the threshold value is exceeded. Moreover, the development of farmers’ cooperatives exhibits significant positive spatial spillover effects, driving the development of the collective economy in neighboring regions through factor mobility and industrial linkages.","基于2015—2023年中国30个省份的面板数据，本文考察了农民合作社对农村集体经济的影响及其作用机制。首先，构建多维评价体系测度农民合作社与农村集体经济的发展水平。随后，采用双向固定效应模型和工具变量法进行基准回归估计，同时通过调节效应模型、门槛效应模型、空间计量模型及分维度检验系统识别其内在机制。结果表明，研究期内中国农民合作社与农村集体经济的整体发展水平呈现明显的时间演变特征。具体而言，农民合作社整体发展水平略有下降，而农村集体经济保持稳定增长。基准回归结果显示，农民合作社发展对农村集体经济具有显著的正向促进作用，且该结论在多重稳健性检验和内生性处理后依然成立。机制分析发现，合作社主要通过提升经营绩效和促进产业升级两条渠道发挥赋能作用，而在规范运营和服务范围等维度上的效应不显著。异质性检验证实，该促进作用呈现明显的区域分化特征，仅在东部地区显著，中西部地区尚未显现。进一步分析表明，农业产业增长率在合作社赋能集体经济的过程中发挥正向调节作用；土地流转水平呈现单一门槛效应，一旦跨越门槛值，合作社的促进作用显著增强。此外，农民合作社发展具有显著的正向空间溢出效应，通过要素流动和产业关联带动邻近地区集体经济发展。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":16,"substance":95,"depth":16,"authority":96,"freshness":97,"relevant":20,"comment":98},22,13,8,"基于30省面板数据的实证研究，方法扎实、结论有新意，对合作社赋能集体经济具政策参考价值。",[100],{"name":91,"url":88},[102,103,104,28,105],"乡村振兴","空间溢出","农村集体经济","农民合作社",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":109},{"candidates":110,"agricultural_evidence":45},[111,117,124,128],{"code":31,"score":112,"supported":45,"title":113,"abstract":114,"tags":116},11,[],[28,105,115],"land transfer",[105,28],{"code":118,"score":119,"supported":45,"title":120,"abstract":121,"tags":123},"I4",4,[],[122],"空间计量",[103],{"code":35,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":125,"abstract":126,"tags":127},[],[],[102],{"code":129,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":130,"abstract":131,"tags":132},"G4",[],[],[104],[134,135],"农民合作社 农村集体经济","合作社 土地流转 门槛效应","农民合作社农村集体经济-5368","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166",{"doi":137,"openalex_id":139,"authors":140,"venue":91,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":148,"card":149,"direction":79,"ingested_from":154},"W7222921695",[141,144,146],{"name":142,"orcid":143},"Miao Qian","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-6758-2924",{"name":145,"orcid":8},"Xiuyu Huang",{"name":147,"orcid":8},"Jiaomeng Li","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":150,"method":151,"finding":152,"direction":79,"opportunity":153},"基于2015–2023年30省面板数据，检验农民合作社对农村集体经济的促进效应及机制。","双向固定效应模型、工具变量法、调节\u002F门槛\u002F空间计量模型及多维评价体系。","合作社通过提升经营绩效与产业升级显著促进集体经济，效应仅东部显著且有正向空间溢出。","可探究中西部效应缺失原因，并引入数字化指标考察合作社信息化对集体经济的赋能路径。","openalex","2026-10-20T23:30:06.525852Z",{"id":157,"title":158,"url":159,"summary":160,"summary_zh":161,"content":8,"source_name":91,"source_url":159,"published_at":162,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":45,"score":163,"score_detail":164,"sources":167,"tags":169,"primary_topic":174,"secondary_topics":175,"classification":176,"search_phrases":193,"slug":196,"view_count":197,"doi":198,"paper":199,"created_at":218},4331,"Does rural land transfer promote high-quality agriculture development? Empirical evidence from 30 provinces in China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003","As a fundamental pathway toward agricultural-scale operations, rural land transfer (RLT) has emerged as an important institutional mechanism for promoting high-quality agricultural development (HQAD). However, how to effectively unleash the productive potential of land resources and align RLT with the objectives of high-quality development remains an important research question. Treating the 2010 national regulatory intensification of rural land transfer as a common policy milestone, this study employs a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) model and a mediating effect model to examine the relationship between RLT intensity and HQAD and to explore the potential transmission role of new agricultural business entities (NABE). The results show that the overall level of HQAD in China has steadily improved, although substantial spatial and temporal disparities remain, with HQAD generally decreasing from the eastern to the central and western regions. The continuous DID estimates indicate a significant positive association between RLT intensity and HQAD after the 2010 national regulatory-intensification milestone, and this relationship remains stable across the reported robustness checks. The mediation analysis provides evidence consistent with a potential transmission pathway through new agricultural business entities (NABE). Furthermore, the estimated association between RLT intensity and HQAD is stronger in the central region and in non-major grain-producing areas.","作为农业规模化经营的基础路径，农地流转(rural land transfer, RLT)已成为推动农业高质量发展(high-quality agricultural development, HQAD)的重要制度安排。然而，如何有效释放土地资源的生产潜力，使农地流转与高质量发展目标相契合，仍是一个重要的研究问题。本研究以2010年国家加强农地流转监管为共同政策节点，采用连续型双重差分(continuous difference-in-differences, DID)模型和中介效应模型，考察农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间的关系，并探讨新型农业经营主体(new agricultural business entities, NABE)可能的中介传导作用。结果表明，中国农业高质量发展总体水平稳步提升，但仍存在显著的空间和时间差异，农业高质量发展水平总体呈东、中、西部递减态势。连续型双重差分估计表明，在2010年国家加强监管这一政策节点之后，农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间存在显著正相关关系，且该关系在各项稳健性检验中保持稳定。中介分析提供了与新型农业经营主体潜在传导路径相一致的证据。此外，农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间的估计关联在中部地区和非粮食主产区更强。","2026-10-06T00:00:00Z",81,{"impact":16,"substance":95,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":165,"relevant":20,"comment":166},9,"基于30省面板数据的连续DID实证研究，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，但属学术论文而非产业动态，适合主题聚合而非头条精选。",[168],{"name":91,"url":159},[170,171,172,173,28],"农业高质量发展","新型农业经营主体","粮食主产区","双重差分",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":177},{"candidates":178,"agricultural_evidence":45},[179,183,188],{"code":31,"score":96,"supported":45,"title":180,"abstract":181,"tags":182},[115],[115],[28,171],{"code":184,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":185,"abstract":186,"tags":187},"A8",[],[],[172],{"code":189,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":190,"abstract":191,"tags":192},"J2",[],[],[170],[194,195],"农村土地流转 农业高质量发展","新型农业经营主体 中介效应","农村土地流转农业高质量发展-4331",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003",{"doi":198,"openalex_id":200,"authors":201,"venue":91,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":212,"card":213,"direction":79,"ingested_from":154},"W7220726312",[202,204,206,208,210],{"name":203,"orcid":8},"Tian Tian",{"name":205,"orcid":8},"Jiawei Yang",{"name":207,"orcid":8},"Tong Yu",{"name":209,"orcid":8},"李孟然",{"name":211,"orcid":8},"Zhen Xie","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":214,"method":215,"finding":216,"direction":79,"opportunity":217},"用连续DID和中介模型检验农村土地流转对农业高质量发展的影响及新型经营主体的中介作用。","2010年政策节点，连续DID与中介效应模型，中国30省面板数据。","土地流转显著促进农业高质量发展，新型经营主体起中介作用，中西部及非主产区效应更强。","可结合数字技术或信息化服务，探究土地流转通过新型经营主体推动农业高质量发展的数字化路径。","2026-10-07T23:30:06.424093Z",{"id":220,"title":221,"url":222,"summary":223,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":224,"source_url":8,"published_at":225,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":45,"score":226,"score_detail":227,"sources":232,"tags":234,"primary_topic":239,"secondary_topics":240,"classification":241,"search_phrases":262,"slug":265,"view_count":71,"doi":8,"paper":266,"created_at":273},4284,"When e-commerce meets smallholders: Boosting incomes and widening gaps in rural China's anti-poverty policy","https:\u002F\u002Fbesjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\u002Ffeed\u002F14678276\u002Fmost-recent","Wenqi Duan等评估中国电子商务进农村(ECC)项目对小型农户农业经营收入水平与分配的影响。研究采用准实验设计发现：ECC项目显著增加家庭人均农业经营收入；通过扩大市场接入推动收入增长，三大机制为经营规模扩大、产出价格提高、向高附加值作物转移；然而这些收益分配不均，项目扩大小农户间收入差距，主要归因于人力、生产、数字资本初始差异。强调电商政策需配套措施缓解异质性初始禀赋带来的差距。","American Journal of Agricultural Economics 10.1002\u002Fajae.70086 2026","2026-10-04T00:00:00Z",89,{"impact":228,"substance":229,"depth":16,"authority":230,"freshness":165,"relevant":20,"comment":231},24,23,15,"顶刊准实验研究揭示电商进农村项目增收与扩大差距的双重效应，政策与学术价值兼具，值得入选每日精选。",[233],{"name":224,"url":222},[25,235,236,237,238],"数字乡村","农户收入","收入差距","电商扶贫",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":242},{"candidates":243,"agricultural_evidence":45},[244,249,253,257],{"code":31,"score":71,"supported":45,"title":245,"abstract":246,"tags":248},[],[247],"小农户",[],{"code":58,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":250,"abstract":251,"tags":252},[],[],[25],{"code":63,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":254,"abstract":255,"tags":256},[],[],[236],{"code":258,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":259,"abstract":260,"tags":261},"I6",[],[],[235],[263,264],"电子商务进农村 ECC 农户收入","农村电商 小农户 收入差距","电子商务进农村ECC农户收入-4284",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":267,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":8,"card":268,"direction":79,"ingested_from":81},[],{"tldr":269,"method":270,"finding":271,"direction":79,"opportunity":272},"评估中国电商进农村项目对农户收入及差距的影响","准实验设计，分析ECC项目对农户农业经营收入的作用","项目显著提高人均农业收入，但扩大农户间收入差距","可研究数字资本差异下电商政策配套措施，缩小农户收入差距","2026-10-06T00:05:04.824292Z",{"id":275,"title":276,"url":277,"summary":278,"summary_zh":279,"content":8,"source_name":91,"source_url":277,"published_at":280,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":281,"score_detail":282,"sources":284,"tags":286,"primary_topic":291,"secondary_topics":292,"classification":293,"search_phrases":311,"slug":314,"view_count":197,"doi":315,"paper":316,"created_at":332},3872,"Land resource misallocation and rural household development resilience in China’s urban–rural transition","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1933343","Market-oriented land allocation is central to rural development, household welfare, and food system stability in developing countries, yet spatial governance failures in China’s urban–rural transition raise concerns about how land resource misallocation, the price distortion between industrial and commercial\u002Fresidential land created by local governments’ land-driven development strategy, affects rural household development resilience, defined as the ability of households to resist risks, adapt to changes, and achieve sustainable recovery in the face of external shocks, and who is left behind. Few studies have rigorously examined the link between misallocation and resilience, tested income diversity as a channel, or explored environmental perception as a moderator. Using China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) data (2012–2022) and provincial land transaction records, this study constructs household-level development resilience measures and employs two-way fixed effects, mediation, and moderation models to examine the association between land resource misallocation and rural household development resilience. The findings are as follows. (1) Land resource misallocation is robustly negatively associated with household development resilience; a one-unit increase in misallocation is associated with a 0.002-unit reduction in resilience, robust to instrumental variable estimation and multiple robustness checks. (2) Income diversity plays a partial mediating role, but its effect is paradoxical: land resource misallocation nominally increases the number of income sources, yet does so by displacing stable property and operating income with low-end precarious employment, creating a “false diversity” of more sources but lower quality that ultimately weakens rather than strengthens resilience. (3) Environmental risk perception positively moderates this relationship; the negative association weakens as environmental risk perception rises, consistent with an interpretation of perception as cognitive adaptive capacity. (4) The negative association is more pronounced among households with higher education, higher dependency ratios, agricultural employment, and exclusion from land transfer markets. These findings highlight that land governance reforms must move beyond factor allocation efficiency to incorporate livelihood ability, food-access capacity, and household development resilience goals.","以市场为导向的土地配置对发展中国家的农村发展、家庭福利和粮食体系稳定至关重要，然而中国城乡转型中的空间治理失灵引发了诸多担忧：土地资源错配——即地方政府土地驱动发展战略所造成的工业用地与商住用地之间的价格扭曲——如何影响农村家庭发展韧性（指家庭在面对外部冲击时抵御风险、适应变化并实现可持续恢复的能力），以及谁被遗留在后。鲜有研究严格考察错配与韧性之间的关联、检验收入多样性作为中介渠道的作用，或探讨环境感知作为调节变量的影响。本研究利用中国家庭追踪调查（CFPS）数据（2012—2022年）和省级土地交易记录，构建家庭层面的发展韧性指标，并采用双向固定效应、中介效应和调节效应模型，考察土地资源错配与农村家庭发展韧性之间的关联。研究发现如下。（1）土地资源错配与家庭发展韧性之间存在稳健的负向关联；错配每增加一个单位，韧性与之相关地下降0.002个单位，该结果在工具变量估计和多项稳健性检验下依然成立。（2）收入多样性发挥部分中介作用，但其效应具有悖论性：土地资源错配名义上增加了收入来源数量，然而其实质是以低端不稳定就业替代了稳定的财产性收入和经营性收入，形成了一种“虚假多样性”——来源更多但质量更低，最终削弱而非增强韧性。（3）环境风险感知对这一关系具有正向调节作用；随着环境风险感知的提高，负向关联减弱，这与将感知视为认知适应能力的解释相一致。（4）这一负向关联在受教育程度较高、抚养比较高、从事农业就业以及被排斥于土地流转市场之外的家庭中更为显著。上述发现表明，土地治理改革必须超越要素配置效率的范畴，将生计能力、粮食获取能力和家庭发展韧性目标纳入其中。","2026-09-30T00:00:00Z",80,{"impact":16,"substance":95,"depth":16,"authority":96,"freshness":165,"relevant":20,"comment":283},"基于CFPS与省级土地交易数据的实证研究，揭示土地资源错配通过“虚假多样性”削弱农户发展韧性，结论对土地治理改革有参考价值。",[285],{"name":91,"url":277},[287,28,288,289,290],"城乡融合","土地资源配置","农户发展韧性","收入多样性",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":294},{"candidates":295,"agricultural_evidence":45},[296,300,306],{"code":31,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":297,"abstract":298,"tags":299},[],[28,115],[28],{"code":35,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":301,"abstract":302,"tags":305},[],[303,304],"农村发展","rural development",[],{"code":307,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":308,"abstract":309,"tags":310},"G5",[],[],[287],[312,313],"CFPS 土地资源错配 农户韧性","城乡转型 土地交易 农村家庭","CFPS土地资源错配农户韧性-3872","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1933343",{"doi":315,"openalex_id":317,"authors":318,"venue":91,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":277,"card":327,"direction":79,"ingested_from":154},"W7214941402",[319,321,324],{"name":320,"orcid":8},"Jinqiong Ouyang",{"name":322,"orcid":323},"Yu HE","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0000-2650-7801",{"name":325,"orcid":326},"Yihang Hu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3674-2308",{"tldr":328,"method":329,"finding":330,"direction":79,"opportunity":331},"基于CFPS与省级土地交易数据，揭示土地资源错配如何削弱中国农村家庭发展韧性。","CFPS 2012–2022面板数据、省级土地交易记录，双向固定效应、中介与调节","土地错配显著降低家庭韧性，收入多样性呈“虚假多样化”中介，环境风险感知起正向调节。","可探究数字技术或土地流转市场信息化能否缓解错配、提升收入质量与家庭韧性。","2026-10-01T23:30:07.151101Z",{"id":334,"title":335,"url":336,"summary":337,"summary_zh":338,"content":8,"source_name":339,"source_url":336,"published_at":340,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":341,"sources":344,"tags":346,"primary_topic":350,"secondary_topics":351,"classification":352,"search_phrases":371,"slug":374,"view_count":197,"doi":375,"paper":376,"created_at":388},3678,"An exploration of sustainable scaled-up operations for smallholder farms in China: drawing on international experience","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893","China’s persistent smallholder farming structure presents a major challenge for agricultural modernisation. This study adopts a farm management perspective, using smallholder farmers as the main micro-level analytical unit, to explore viable paths for achieving sustainable agricultural structural transformation in China. The core contradiction facing China’s agricultural development—the ‘Smallholder Dilemma’—is conceptualised as four interrelated structural constraints: insufficient cropland per household unit, fragmentation of land holdings leading to a significant increase in production costs, acceleration of land de-agriculture, and systematic failure of land mobility policies. International comparative analyses suggest that major advances in agricultural modernisation have often occurred alongside improvements in land governance, market institutions, agricultural service systems, and the organisation of production; however, the country cases do not establish a universal causal sequence or a directly transferable quantitative benchmark. Based on these findings, this study proposes a three-stage institutional framework tailored to China’s context. The framework emphasises improving land transfer and service-market mechanisms in the short term, establishing a rights-protective and voluntary push–pull mechanism to support agricultural transition in the medium term, and promoting diversified agricultural production entities and organisational innovation in the long term.","中国持续存在的小农经营结构对农业现代化构成重大挑战。本研究从农场管理视角出发，以小农作为主要微观分析单元，探讨中国实现可持续农业结构转型的可行路径。中国农业发展面临的核心矛盾——“小农困境”——被概念化为四个相互关联的结构性约束：户均耕地不足、土地细碎化导致生产成本显著上升、土地去农业化加速，以及土地流转政策的系统性失灵。国际比较分析表明，农业现代化的重大进展往往伴随着土地治理、市场制度、农业服务体系和生产组织的改善；然而，国别案例并不能确立普遍的因果顺序或可直接移植的量化基准。基于上述发现，本研究提出了一个针对中国情境的三阶段制度框架。该框架强调：短期内完善土地流转和服务市场机制；中期建立权利保障型和自愿性的推拉机制以支持农业转型；长期促进多元化农业生产主体和组织创新。","Cogent Food & Agriculture","2026-09-25T00:00:00Z",{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":342,"authority":96,"freshness":97,"relevant":20,"comment":343},17,"从农场管理视角系统剖析中国小农困境并提出三阶段制度框架，国际比较扎实，对农业现代化与土地政策研究有参考价值。",[345],{"name":339,"url":336},[247,347,348,28,349],"农业现代化","农业社会化服务","土地治理",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":353},{"candidates":354,"agricultural_evidence":45},[355,361,365],{"code":31,"score":356,"supported":45,"title":357,"abstract":359,"tags":360},20,[358],"smallholder",[28,358,115],[348,28,247],{"code":189,"score":119,"supported":45,"title":362,"abstract":363,"tags":364},[],[347],[347],{"code":366,"score":71,"supported":45,"title":367,"abstract":368,"tags":370},"H8",[],[369],"可持续农业",[],[372,373],"小农户 土地流转 农业现代化","小农困境 土地治理","小农户土地流转农业现代化-3678","10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893",{"doi":375,"openalex_id":377,"authors":378,"venue":339,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":382,"card":383,"direction":79,"ingested_from":154},"W7214366575",[379],{"name":380,"orcid":381},"Yujia Huo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-2578-2859","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tandfonline.com\u002Fdoi\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893?needAccess=true",{"tldr":384,"method":385,"finding":386,"direction":79,"opportunity":387},"基于农场管理视角，分析中国小农困境并借鉴国际经验提出三阶段制度框架。","国际比较分析与制度经济学框架，以小农为微观分析单元。","小农困境源于四重结构约束，需分短期、中期、长期三阶段制度创新。","可探究数字平台与土地流转、服务市场机制结合如何缓解小农困境。","2026-09-28T23:30:42.560643Z",{"id":390,"title":391,"url":392,"summary":393,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":394,"source_url":8,"published_at":395,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":396,"score_detail":397,"sources":399,"tags":401,"primary_topic":405,"secondary_topics":406,"classification":407,"search_phrases":429,"slug":432,"view_count":19,"doi":8,"paper":433,"created_at":440},3445,"《产业链视角下电商驱动农业数字化转型的理论解构与案例分析——兼论农业'产业大脑'的经验启示》","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanzj.com\u002Fhek\u002Fzgncgc\u002Fmulu\u002F646984.html","王昕天、荆林波、冯章伟基于产业链视角从技术采纳模型和产业链联动效应出发，建立电商驱动农业数字化转型两阶段模型。通过临安山核桃、武乡小米和新平脐橙三个农业特色产业案例比较，提炼电商驱动农业数字化转型的特征：本质是农业借助数字技术实现农产品商品化、农业功能多样化和涉农服务价值化；农业社会化服务滞后是重要制约；数据开放共享是关键支撑；标准化程度是影响农业数字化转型扩散的核心要素。","《中国农村经济》\u002F宁波大学商学院","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",78,{"impact":16,"substance":95,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":398},"核心期刊论文，以三地特色产业案例构建电商驱动农业数字化转型两阶段模型，理论增量与案例比较扎实，对数字乡村与产业大脑实践有参考价值。",[400],{"name":394,"url":392},[25,402,403,404,348],"农业数字化","农业产业链","产业大脑",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":408},{"candidates":409,"agricultural_evidence":45},[410,415,420,424],{"code":31,"score":119,"supported":45,"title":411,"abstract":412,"tags":414},[],[413],"社会化服务",[348],{"code":416,"score":197,"supported":13,"title":417,"abstract":418,"tags":419},"I1",[],[],[404,402],{"code":58,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":421,"abstract":422,"tags":423},[],[],[25],{"code":425,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":426,"abstract":427,"tags":428},"I",[],[],[402],[430,431],"临安山核桃 电商 数字化","武乡小米 新平脐橙 产业链","临安山核桃电商数字化-3445",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":434,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":74,"oa_url":8,"card":435,"direction":79,"ingested_from":81},[],{"tldr":436,"method":437,"finding":438,"direction":79,"opportunity":439},"从产业链视角构建电商驱动农业数字化转型的两阶段模型，并用三个特色产业案例验证。","技术采纳模型与产业链联动效应，比较临安山核桃、武乡小米、新平脐橙案例。","转型本质是农产品商品化、农业功能多样化与服务价值化；社会化服务滞后、数据共享与标准化是关键。","可量化测度社会化服务、数据开放与标准化对转型扩散的影响，并探索农业'产业大脑'的落地机制。","2026-09-25T00:09:34.507410Z"]