[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2296":3,"related-2296":76},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":32,"classification":33,"search_phrases":51,"slug":54,"view_count":22,"doi":55,"paper":56,"created_at":75},2296,"A critical analysis of co-production in a living lab through citizen-centric innovation for climate-resilient agri-food systems","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1906832","Introduction Living Labs (LLs) are increasingly used by scientists and practitioners to support participatory innovation, yet little is known about how such approaches function when introduced through externally funded projects in low-income contexts. Methods This article examines the establishment of a Living Lab for People (LL4P) in Nandi County, Kenya, between 2022 and 2025. The study draws on repeated interviews with advisory board members, workshop observations, project documents, and institutional reports to analyse how the LL4P was designed, governed, and implemented in practice. Results The findings show that the development of a locally embedded LL depended less on technical innovation processes than on negotiations around power, ownership, inclusion, and institutional legitimacy. A key turning point was the decision by the initiating research team to transfer agenda-setting and decision-making responsibilities to the LL4P advisory board, which strengthened local ownership and agency. However, broad stakeholder representation did not automatically resolve tensions related to power asymmetries, governance ambiguity, or differing understandings of inclusion and gender transformation. Discussion The paper argues that LLs in agri-food systems should be understood as social and political processes rather than primarily technical innovation platforms. Based on the Nandi County experience, we propose a revised conceptualization of the LL4P as a citizen-centric and place-based innovation space that emphasizes co-design, learning, and locally negotiated governance. The study contributes empirical insights into how externally initiated LLs can gradually transition toward more locally led and context-responsive forms of innovation governance.","引言 “生活实验室”（Living Labs, LLs）日益被科学家和实践者用于支持参与式创新，然而对于此类方法在低收入背景下通过外部资助项目引入时如何运作，人们知之甚少。方法 本文考察了2022年至2025年间在肯尼亚南迪郡建立的一个“以人为本的生活实验室”（Living Lab for People, LL4P）。本研究基于对顾问委员会成员的多次访谈、研讨会观察、项目文件及机构报告，分析了该LL4P在实践中是如何设计、治理和实施的。结果 研究结果表明，一个深度嵌入当地的生活实验室的发展，与其说取决于技术创新过程，不如说取决于围绕权力、所有权、包容性和制度合法性所展开的协商。一个关键转折点是发起研究团队决定将议程设定和决策职责移交给LL4P顾问委员会，这增强了地方所有权和能动性。然而，广泛的利益相关方代表性并未自动化解与权力不对称、治理模糊性以及对包容性和性别转型的不同理解相关的紧张关系。讨论 本文认为，农业食品系统中的生活实验室应被理解为社会和政治过程，而非主要是技术创新平台。基于南迪郡的经验，我们提出对LL4P的修正性概念化，将其视为一个以公民为中心、基于地方的创新空间，强调共同设计、学习和地方协商治理。本研究为外部发起的生活实验室如何逐步过渡到更具地方主导性和情境回应性的创新治理形式提供了经验性见解。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-11T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,70,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},12,20,17,13,8,1,"以肯尼亚Nandi County活实验室为案例，实证揭示外部资助型参与式创新中权力、所有权与制度合法性的博弈，对农业信息化项目的本土化治理有借鉴价值，但属境外案例、影响范围有限。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"数字乡村","肯尼亚","气候韧性农业","农业治理","参与式创新",[],{"status":34,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":37},"unclassified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":38,"agricultural_evidence":49,"reason":50},[39,44],{"code":40,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":41,"abstract":42,"tags":43},"H7",[],[],[29],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":48},"I6",[],[],[27],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[52,53],"气候韧性农业 参与式创新 农业治理 数字乡村","气候韧性农业 参与式创新","气候韧性农业参与式创新农业治理数字乡村-2296","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1906832",{"doi":55,"openalex_id":57,"authors":58,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":6,"card":68,"direction":72,"ingested_from":74},"W7212314804",[59,62,64],{"name":60,"orcid":61},"Birgit Habermann","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7130-670X",{"name":63,"orcid":9},"Kibet Walter",{"name":65,"orcid":66},"Ryan Nehring","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0867-7820",0,{"tldr":69,"method":70,"finding":71,"direction":72,"opportunity":73},"分析肯尼亚Nandi县生活实验室的共建过程，揭示其本质是社会政治过程而非技术平台。","对咨询委员会成员重复访谈、工作坊观察及项目文档的定性分析。","权力转移给地方咨询委员会增强了自主权，但利益相关方广泛参与未自动解决权力不对称与治理模糊。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究外部资助项目退出后，生活实验室如何维持地方主导的治理与创新网络。","openalex","2026-09-13T23:30:07.447748Z",{"total":77,"page":22,"page_size":77,"items":78},6,[79,138,212,277,343,389],{"id":80,"title":81,"url":82,"summary":83,"summary_zh":84,"content":9,"source_name":85,"source_url":82,"published_at":86,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":87,"score_detail":88,"sources":92,"tags":94,"primary_topic":97,"secondary_topics":103,"classification":104,"search_phrases":118,"slug":121,"view_count":122,"doi":123,"paper":124,"created_at":137},1295,"Technological-Institutional Co-Evolution in Agricultural Systems: A Unified Framework of Smart Farming, Rural E-Commerce, and Digital Governance","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.22004\u002Fag.econ.410222","This study advances the agricultural systems literature by theorizing and empirically validating the co-evolution of digital technologies and institutional governance in rural transformation. While prior research has examined precision agriculture, rural e-commerce, and digital governance separately, this paper develops a unified Technological-Institutional Co-Evolution Model that positions digital governance as an endogenous, mediating force within agricultural innovation systems. Using a stratified multi-actor dataset (N = 320) of farmers, agri-tech entrepreneurs, and rural officials, the study applies a mixed-methods approach combining instrumental variable (2SLS) estimation and structural equation modeling (SEM) to address endogeneity and estimate both direct and indirect effects. Results show that digital technology adoption significantly increases perceived agricultural productivity (β = 0.64, p \u003C 0.01) and reduces perceived operational costs (β = −0.51, p \u003C 0.01). However, its impact on market integration is not independent; it depends on institutional capacity. Digital governance plays a significant mediating role (indirect β = 0.22, p \u003C 0.01), acting as a “trust infrastructure” that lowers transaction costs, reduces information asymmetries, and bridges institutional gaps in rural economies. These findings challenge techno-deterministic perspectives by demonstrating that technology diffusion alone cannot ensure inclusive agricultural transformation. Instead, outcomes depend on the alignment between technological adoption, governance modernization, and human capital development, particularly in contexts with substantial digital skills gaps (60%). The study contributes to Agricultural Innovation Systems theory by integrating institutional and technological dimensions and offers policy insights that emphasize coordinated socio-technical interventions over fragmented, technology-driven approaches.","本研究通过理论构建与实证检验，推进了农业系统文献中关于数字技术与制度治理在农村转型中协同演化的探讨。尽管已有研究分别考察了精准农业、农村电子商务和数字治理，本文则提出了一个统一的“技术—制度协同演化模型”，将数字治理定位为农业创新系统中的内生性中介力量。基于分层多主体数据集（样本量N=320），涵盖农户、农业科技企业家和农村官员，本研究采用混合方法，结合工具变量法（2SLS）估计与结构方程模型（SEM），以处理内生性问题并估计直接与间接效应。结果显示，数字技术采纳显著提升了感知农业生产力（β = 0.64，p \u003C 0.01），并显著降低了感知运营成本（β = −0.51，p \u003C 0.01）。然而，其对市场整合的影响并非独立存在，而是依赖于制度能力。数字治理在其中发挥了显著的中介作用（间接β = 0.22，p \u003C 0.01），充当一种“信任基础设施”，降低了交易成本，减少了信息不对称，并弥合了农村经济中的制度鸿沟。这些发现挑战了技术决定论视角，表明仅靠技术扩散无法确保包容性农业转型；相反，结果取决于技术采纳、治理现代化与人力资本开发之间的协同匹配，尤其是在数字技能差距显著（60%）的背景下。本研究通过整合制度与技术维度，为农业创新系统理论作出贡献，并提供政策启示，强调协调的社会技术干预优于碎片化的技术驱动路径。","AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","2026-08-31T00:00:00Z",83,{"impact":89,"substance":89,"depth":18,"authority":17,"freshness":90,"relevant":22,"comment":91},22,7,"提出技术-制度共演模型，实证揭示数字治理的中介作用，对农业信息化政策制定有重要参考价值。",[93],{"name":85,"url":82},[27,95,96,30],"智慧农业","制度创新",{"code":98,"slug":99,"name":100,"path":101,"parent_code":102},"I1","smart-agriculture","智慧农业总论","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fsmart-agriculture","I",[],{"status":105,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":106},"classified",{"candidates":107,"agricultural_evidence":49},[108,114],{"code":98,"score":90,"supported":49,"title":109,"abstract":110,"tags":113},[],[111,112],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[95],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":115,"abstract":116,"tags":117},[],[],[27],[119,120],"农业治理 制度创新 数字乡村 智慧农业","农业治理 制度创新","农业治理制度创新数字乡村智慧农业-1295",2,"10.22004\u002Fag.econ.410222",{"doi":123,"openalex_id":125,"authors":126,"venue":85,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":82,"card":130,"direction":136,"ingested_from":74},"W7204784135",[127],{"name":128,"orcid":129},"Paraschos Maniatis","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7036-6468",{"tldr":131,"method":132,"finding":133,"direction":134,"opportunity":135},"提出并验证数字技术与制度治理在农业系统中的协同演化模型，强调数字治理的中介作用。","混合方法：2SLS和结构方程模型，分析320名多主体数据。","数字技术提升生产力、降低成本，但市场整合依赖制度能力，数字治理起关键中介作用。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可探索数字技能差距对技术采纳与治理协同的影响，以及不同制度环境下数字治理的适配机制。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-01T23:30:08.914546Z",{"id":139,"title":140,"url":141,"summary":142,"summary_zh":143,"content":9,"source_name":144,"source_url":141,"published_at":145,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":146,"score_detail":147,"sources":151,"tags":153,"primary_topic":158,"secondary_topics":162,"classification":163,"search_phrases":190,"slug":193,"view_count":67,"doi":194,"paper":195,"created_at":211},5581,"How Does Digital Literacy Promote Inclusive Rural Growth? Micro-Level Evidence from Income Inequality Among Farm Households","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fsu182010689","Against the backdrop of the coordinated advancement of digital village construction and the common prosperity strategy, the widespread improvement in rural households’ digital literacy is emerging as a key force in reshaping rural income distribution and enabling sustainable rural development. Whether digital dividends can equitably benefit farm households with heterogeneous endowments has a direct bearing on the inclusive growth outcomes of digital village construction and the sustainable advancement of the common prosperity goal. Using three waves of panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering 2018 to 2022, this paper empirically examines the impact of digital literacy on income inequality among rural households. The findings indicate that improvements in digital literacy significantly reduce rural household income inequality, and this conclusion remains robust across a series of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that digital literacy mainly curbs the widening of rural household income gaps through two core channels: expanding social capital and alleviating credit constraints. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the inequality-reducing effect of digital literacy is more pronounced among households that depend on non-agricultural income, have lower levels of human capital, or fall into relatively lower income brackets. Further analysis demonstrates that digital literacy significantly reduces inequalities in wage income, business income, and property income across rural households, whereas its mitigating effect on transfer income inequality is not statistically significant. Meanwhile, digital literacy significantly raises the probability of upward income mobility among rural households, thereby alleviating income inequality from a dynamic perspective. On the basis of these findings, this paper proposes policy implications in several areas: building a hierarchical and categorized rural digital literacy cultivation system, fostering a virtuous cycle of digital empowerment, equal opportunity, and income convergence, and optimizing income distribution structures and dynamic mobility mechanisms, with the aim of accelerating progress toward common prosperity.","在数字乡村建设与共同富裕战略协同推进的背景下，农户数字素养的普遍提升正成为重塑乡村收入分配格局、实现乡村可持续发展的重要力量。数字红利能否公平惠及禀赋异质性农户，直接关系到数字乡村建设的包容性增长成效与共同富裕目标的可持续推进。本文利用中国家庭追踪调查（CFPS）2018—2022年三期面板数据，实证检验数字素养对农户收入不平等的影响。研究发现，数字素养的提升显著降低了农户收入不平等，这一结论在一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。机制分析表明，数字素养主要通过拓展社会资本与缓解信贷约束两条核心渠道抑制农户收入差距的扩大。异质性分析显示，数字素养的减不平等效应在依赖非农收入、人力资本水平较低或处于相对较低收入区间的农户中更为明显。进一步分析发现，数字素养显著缩小了农户工资性收入、经营性收入和财产性收入的不平等，而对转移性收入不平等的缓解作用在统计上不显著。同时，数字素养显著提高了农户收入向上流动的概率，从而从动态视角缓解了收入不平等。基于上述发现，本文从构建分层分类的农户数字素养培育体系、形成数字赋能—机会均等—收入收敛的良性循环、优化收入分配结构与动态流动机制等方面提出政策启示，以期为加快共同富裕进程提供参考。","Sustainability","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",80,{"impact":148,"substance":89,"depth":148,"authority":20,"freshness":149,"relevant":22,"comment":150},18,9,"基于CFPS三期面板数据的微观实证，方法规范、结论有新意，对数字乡村与共同富裕政策有参考价值，值得进入每日精选。",[152],{"name":144,"url":141},[27,154,155,156,157],"数字素养","共同富裕","农民收入","收入不平等",{"code":45,"slug":159,"name":160,"path":161,"parent_code":102},"digital-village","数字乡村与数据要素","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fdigital-village",[],{"status":105,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":164},{"candidates":165,"agricultural_evidence":49},[166,171,178,185],{"code":45,"score":21,"supported":49,"title":167,"abstract":168,"tags":170},[],[27,169],"digital village",[27,154],{"code":172,"score":77,"supported":49,"title":173,"abstract":174,"tags":177},"G6",[],[175,176],"农户收入","rural income",[],{"code":179,"score":180,"supported":49,"title":181,"abstract":182,"tags":184},"G",3,[],[183],"rural development",[],{"code":186,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":187,"abstract":188,"tags":189},"G4",[],[],[155],[191,192],"CFPS 数字素养 农户收入","数字素养 农村收入差距","CFPS数字素养农户收入-5581","10.3390\u002Fsu182010689",{"doi":194,"openalex_id":196,"authors":197,"venue":144,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":141,"card":206,"direction":72,"ingested_from":74},"W7223105459",[198,201,204],{"name":199,"orcid":200},"Yong Feng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8151-8594",{"name":202,"orcid":203},"Shuokai  kai Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-7439-1764",{"name":205,"orcid":9},"Fangping Cao",{"tldr":207,"method":208,"finding":209,"direction":72,"opportunity":210},"基于CFPS三期面板数据，实证检验数字素养对农户收入不平等的影响。","使用CFPS 2018-2022三期面板数据，进行机制与异质性分析。","数字素养通过扩展社会资本和缓解信贷约束显著缩小农户收入差距。","可延伸研究数字素养对不同收入来源不平等的差异化机制及动态收入流动路径。","2026-10-22T11:20:47.675827Z",{"id":213,"title":214,"url":215,"summary":216,"summary_zh":217,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":215,"published_at":145,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":218,"score_detail":219,"sources":222,"tags":224,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":229,"classification":230,"search_phrases":261,"slug":264,"view_count":67,"doi":265,"paper":266,"created_at":276},5545,"Regional digital finance and food supply-chain management resilience: evidence on the regional-to-firm conversion gap in China’s emerging listed food enterprises","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1948192","Food supply chains face climate shocks, logistics disruption, food-safety incidents and volatile demand, yet the relevance of regional digital finance for firm-level resilience remains uncertain. This study examines the association between a province-level digital-finance environment and an accounting-based food supply-chain resilience proxy among emerging listed food enterprises in China. Using public data for 122 eligible firms, we construct annual resistance, recovery and stability measures from revenue, operating cash flow and net margin; the common two-way fixed-effects sample contains 732 firm-year observations from 119 firms during 2017–2023. Regional digital finance is measured as a province-level external financial environment rather than firm-level digital transformation or adoption. Operational capability and regional consumption capacity are accounting- and province-level proxies and do not directly observe supplier coordination, traceability, cold-chain performance, or product-level demand. The preferred estimate is close to zero [beta = −0.005, SE = 0.063, 95% CI (−0.128, 0.117)]. Alternative covariance estimators, outcome definitions and timing specifications do not establish a stable positive within-firm association. The proxy-based operational-capability pathway and the conditional consumption-capacity association are likewise not established. Equivalence tests at 0.05 and 0.10 SCR-standard-deviation bounds are not significant, and the approximate 80% minimum detectable effect is 1.575 SCR standard deviations. The evidence therefore cannot distinguish a small contextual association from limited within-firm statistical precision. The findings support a bounded regional-to-firm conversion interpretation: regional finance may widen resource availability, but whether it is associated with resilience depends on unobserved operational conversion routines and food-sector coordination conditions.","食品供应链面临气候冲击、物流中断、食品安全事件和需求波动，但区域数字金融与企业层面韧性之间的关联仍不确定。本研究考察省级数字金融环境与中国新兴上市食品企业基于会计的食品供应链韧性代理指标之间的关联。利用122家合格企业的公开数据，我们从营业收入、经营现金流和净利润率构建年度抵抗能力、恢复能力和稳定性指标；共同双向固定效应样本包含2017—2023年间119家企业的732个企业—年度观测值。区域数字金融被衡量为省级外部金融环境，而非企业层面的数字化转型或采用。运营能力和区域消费能力为会计层面和省级层面的代理变量，并不直接观测供应商协调、可追溯性、冷链绩效或产品层面需求。首选估计值接近于零[beta = −0.005，SE = 0.063，95% CI（−0.128，0.117）]。替代协方差估计量、结果定义和时序设定均未能确立稳定的企业内正向关联。基于代理变量的运营能力路径和条件性消费能力关联同样未能确立。在0.05和0.10个SCR标准差边界上的等价性检验不显著，约80%的最小可检测效应为1.575个SCR标准差。因此，证据无法区分微小的情境性关联与有限的企业内统计精度。研究结果支持有界的情境到企业转化解释：区域金融可能拓宽资源可得性，但其是否与韧性相关联取决于未观测到的运营转化惯例和食品行业协调条件。",69,{"impact":21,"substance":220,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":221},21,"基于122家上市食品企业的严谨实证研究，发现区域数字金融与企业韧性关联接近于零，对数字乡村金融政策有边界性提示价值，但属细分学术结论，公共影响有限。",[223],{"name":10,"url":215},[27,225,226,227,228],"数字金融","供应链韧性","农业企业","食品供应链",[],{"status":231,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":232},"needs_review",{"candidates":233,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":260},[234,240,246,251,256],{"code":235,"score":180,"supported":49,"title":236,"abstract":237,"tags":239},"E3",[],[238],"冷链",[],{"code":241,"score":180,"supported":49,"title":242,"abstract":243,"tags":245},"E4",[],[244],"食品安全",[],{"code":247,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":248,"abstract":249,"tags":250},"G2",[],[],[227],{"code":252,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":253,"abstract":254,"tags":255},"G3",[],[],[225],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":257,"abstract":258,"tags":259},[],[],[27],"农业相关性需要复核",[262,263],"区域数字金融 食品供应链韧性","中国上市食品企业 供应链韧性","区域数字金融食品供应链韧性-5545","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1948192",{"doi":265,"openalex_id":267,"authors":268,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":215,"card":271,"direction":72,"ingested_from":74},"W7223086503",[269],{"name":270,"orcid":9},"Jieyu Zhao",{"tldr":272,"method":273,"finding":274,"direction":72,"opportunity":275},"检验省级数字金融环境与中国新兴上市食品企业供应链韧性之间的关系。","基于122家上市食品企业2017–2023年公开数据，构建双向固定效应模型与等价","区域数字金融与企业供应链韧性无稳定正相关，估计值接近零且不显著。","可研究区域金融资源如何经企业运营惯例转化为供应链韧性，并补充冷链、溯源等微观数据。","2026-10-22T11:20:15.297878Z",{"id":278,"title":279,"url":280,"summary":281,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":282,"source_url":9,"published_at":283,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":146,"score_detail":284,"sources":287,"tags":289,"primary_topic":294,"secondary_topics":299,"classification":300,"search_phrases":330,"slug":333,"view_count":67,"doi":9,"paper":334,"created_at":342},5538,"互联网接入如何影响农户绿色生产行为：来自河南的证据","https:\u002F\u002Feconpapers.repec.org\u002Farticle\u002Fcaajnlage\u002Fv_3a72_3ay_3a2026_3ai_3a9_3aid_3a351-2025-agricecon.htm","基于河南农村观察点2009至2022年面板数据，研究发现互联网接入使农户化肥与农药支出分别下降13.3%和16.3%，通过提升信息可及性、技术学习效率与市场联结发挥作用。异质性上，教育程度高、机械化水平高、经营规模较大、健康、年龄较轻、决策集中以及位于城郊、贫困村与传统村的农户效应更明显。","Agricultural Economics 2026-10-20","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",{"impact":148,"substance":89,"depth":148,"authority":285,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":286},14,"基于河南2009—2022年面板数据的实证研究，量化互联网接入对化肥农药减量的因果效应，数据扎实、结论可靠，对数字乡村与绿色转型政策有参考价值。",[288],{"name":282,"url":280},[27,290,291,292,293],"河南","绿色生产","农户行为","互联网接入",{"code":295,"slug":296,"name":297,"path":298,"parent_code":9},"F","inputs-equipment","农业投入品与装备","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment",[],{"status":301,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":302},"partial",{"candidates":303,"agricultural_evidence":49,"reason":329},[304,310,316,320,325],{"code":305,"score":180,"supported":49,"title":306,"abstract":307,"tags":309},"F4",[],[308],"农药",[],{"code":311,"score":180,"supported":49,"title":312,"abstract":313,"tags":315},"F5",[],[314],"机械化",[],{"code":247,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":317,"abstract":318,"tags":319},[],[],[292],{"code":321,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":322,"abstract":323,"tags":324},"H8",[],[],[291],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":326,"abstract":327,"tags":328},[],[],[27],"一级领域明确，二级方向需要细分",[331,332],"河南 农户 互联网接入 化肥农药","互联网接入 绿色生产 面板数据","河南农户互联网接入化肥农药-5538",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":335,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":9,"card":336,"direction":72,"ingested_from":341},[],{"tldr":337,"method":338,"finding":339,"direction":72,"opportunity":340},"基于河南面板数据，研究互联网接入对农户绿色生产行为的影响。","河南农村观察点2009-2022年面板数据，实证分析互联网接入与化肥农药支出的关","互联网接入使化肥和农药支出分别下降13.3%和16.3%，通过信息可及性、技术学习和市场联结起作用。","可探究互联网影响绿色生产的长期动态与作用机制，并关注异质性群体的差异化干预策略。","agent","2026-10-22T00:07:10.263484Z",{"id":344,"title":345,"url":346,"summary":347,"summary_zh":9,"content":348,"source_name":349,"source_url":9,"published_at":145,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":350,"score_detail":351,"sources":354,"tags":356,"primary_topic":361,"secondary_topics":365,"classification":366,"search_phrases":377,"slug":380,"view_count":90,"doi":9,"paper":381,"created_at":388},5537,"农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链：协同机制与制度逻辑","https:\u002F\u002Fkyy.nwafu.edu.cn\u002Fkjjz\u002Fxdkjjz\u002F557ffd662c8e4af98e46fbf90f35d91f.htm","西北农林科技大学阮俊虎教授团队联合德国哥廷根大学于晓华教授，以大荔县国家现代农业产业园等为典型案例，从交易成本理论出发围绕技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理与价值分配四个机制开展案例内分析与跨案例比较，揭示农业产业园作为中国特色制度平台促进小农户融入数字化供应链的深层逻辑。","近日，经济管理学院“数智农业运营管理团队”阮俊虎教授联合德国哥廷根大学于晓华教授在《中国农村经济》发表题为“农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链：协同机制与制度逻辑”的研究论文，通过多案例研究揭示农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的协同机制，并阐释机制形成与运行的制度逻辑。博士研究生刘晨欢为第一作者，阮俊虎教授为通讯作者，王月博士和于晓华教授为合作学者。\n\n数字技术正深刻重构农产品供应链格局，大型电商平台等供应链核心主体加速构建覆盖生产源头至消费终端的数字化供应链体系，该体系不仅体现为数字技术在生产、销售、物流等环节的应用，更强调不同环节与经营主体之间的系统协同与数据贯通，小农户亟须有效融入数字化供应链以应对市场竞争格局的深刻变化。然而，“大国小农”国情农情下，小农户经营规模较小、土地细碎化程度较高，难以独立对接数字化、规模化的现代供应链体系。促进小农户深度融入数字化供应链，进而实现小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接，成为农业现代化进程中值得关注的重要议题。农业产业园作为区域农业发展的综合性制度平台，兼具资源集聚、组织协同与制度保障三重优势，能够为地方政府及园区经营管理主体协同整合制度资源并协调多元主体关系提供平台支撑，但将资源集聚、组织协同和制度供给优势转化为小农户融入数字化供应链的现实能力，其内在机理尚未得到系统性揭示。\n\n本文立足“农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的内在机理”这一科学问题，从交易成本理论出发，以大荔县国家现代农业产业园等为典型案例，围绕技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理和价值分配四个机制开展案例内分析与跨案例比较分析，揭示不同园区作用机制的共性、差异及情境适配特征，并从制度层面阐释农业产业园作为中国特色制度平台，促进小农户融入数字化供应链的深层逻辑。研究旨在为农业经营呈现小规模、分散化特征的国家和地区促进小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接提供理论参考与实践借鉴。\n\n该研究得到国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国农产品供应链数字化转型的发展战略与实施路径研究”（23&ZD123）的资助。\n\n论文链接：\n\n[https:\u002F\u002Fzgncjj.ajcass.com\u002F?jumpnotice=201606270007#\u002FissueDetail?contentId=123722&year=2026&issue=10&title=%E5%BD%93%E6%9C%9F%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95](https:\u002F\u002Fzgncjj.ajcass.com\u002F?jumpnotice=201606270007#\u002FissueDetail?contentId=123722&year=2026&issue=10&title=%E5%BD%93%E6%9C%9F%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95)\n\n编辑：张晴 终审：刘玉峰","中国农村经济 2026-10-21",82,{"impact":148,"substance":89,"depth":148,"authority":352,"freshness":149,"relevant":22,"comment":353},15,"核心期刊论文，多案例揭示农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的协同机制与制度逻辑，理论新意足、政策参考价值高，值得进入每日精选。",[355],{"name":349,"url":346},[27,357,358,359,360],"小农户","制度逻辑","数字化供应链","农业产业园",{"code":247,"slug":362,"name":363,"path":364,"parent_code":179},"farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services",[],{"status":105,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":367},{"candidates":368,"agricultural_evidence":49},[369,373],{"code":247,"score":17,"supported":49,"title":370,"abstract":371,"tags":372},[357],[357],[357],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":374,"abstract":375,"tags":376},[],[],[27],[378,379],"农业产业园 小农户 数字化供应链","大荔县 国家现代农业产业园","农业产业园小农户数字化供应链-5537",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":382,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":9,"card":383,"direction":72,"ingested_from":341},[],{"tldr":384,"method":385,"finding":386,"direction":72,"opportunity":387},"以农业产业园为案例，揭示其促进小农户融入数字化供应链的机制与制度逻辑。","交易成本理论，大荔县等典型案例的案例内分析与跨案例比较。","技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理与价值分配四机制共同推动小农户融入数字化供应链。","可量化检验四机制对农户融入绩效的影响，并比较不同产业园模式的适用边界。","2026-10-22T00:07:10.192700Z",{"id":390,"title":391,"url":392,"summary":393,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":394,"source_url":9,"published_at":395,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":396,"score_detail":397,"sources":399,"tags":401,"primary_topic":9,"secondary_topics":406,"classification":407,"search_phrases":424,"slug":427,"view_count":67,"doi":428,"paper":429,"created_at":436},5530,"农户参与契约链与数字链的程度与耦合协调：来自中国农户的证据","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1057\u002Fs41599-026-09019-5","基于中国农村振兴调查数据，构建熵权法指数体系测量农户参与契约链与数字链的深度，并用耦合协调模型评估二者互动。结果显示两类链条参与水平均偏低，数字链参与普遍高于契约链，耦合协调度处于「轻微不协调」区间；东部数字链参与较高但契约链较弱导致协调度偏低，南部地区因双重优势协调度更高。","Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2026-10-16","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",78,{"impact":148,"substance":89,"depth":148,"authority":285,"freshness":77,"relevant":22,"comment":398},"基于全国农户调查的实证研究，揭示契约链与数字链参与偏低及区域协调差异，对数字乡村建设有参考价值。",[400],{"name":394,"url":392},[402,27,403,404,405],"农村电商","耦合协调","农户参与","契约农业",[],{"status":34,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":408},{"candidates":409,"agricultural_evidence":49,"reason":50},[410,415,420],{"code":411,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":412,"abstract":413,"tags":414},"E5",[],[],[402],{"code":416,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":417,"abstract":418,"tags":419},"I4",[],[],[403],{"code":45,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":421,"abstract":422,"tags":423},[],[],[27],[425,426],"中国农户 契约链 数字链","农村振兴调查 耦合协调","中国农户契约链数字链-5530","10.1057\u002Fs41599-026-09019-5",{"doi":428,"openalex_id":9,"authors":430,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":67,"oa_url":9,"card":431,"direction":72,"ingested_from":341},[],{"tldr":432,"method":433,"finding":434,"direction":72,"opportunity":435},"基于中国农户调查数据，测度农户参与契约链与数字链的程度及其耦合协调关系。","中国农村振兴调查数据，熵权法构建指数，耦合协调模型评估互动。","两类链条参与均偏低，数字链高于契约链，耦合协调度处于轻微不协调区间。","可探究数字链领先而契约链滞后的成因，及区域差异下提升耦合协调的干预路径。","2026-10-22T00:07:09.568955Z"]