[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-2751":3,"related-2751":88},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":32,"secondary_topics":38,"classification":39,"search_phrases":69,"slug":72,"view_count":21,"doi":73,"paper":74,"created_at":87},2751,"Revised diets and urban infrastructure can improve human health and the global environment","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1881497","Current patterns of food production and consumption are widely recognised as unsustainable. This review explores opportunities to shift food systems towards healthy diets and secure food yields while remaining within planetary resource boundaries. Drawing on improved global data on the environmental impacts of different foods, we adopt a systems perspective to examine the interconnected nexus of health, diets and the global environment, with particular attention to the role of future urban food systems. As the global population becomes increasingly urbanised, cities have the potential to reshape food systems and urban infrastructure. Our analysis suggests that the Earth could feed some 10 billion people by the end of the century on less than half of today’s agricultural land if diets shift towards more plant-based and soilless foods, food waste is substantially reduced, and nutrients from urban waste streams are recycled as complementary fertilisers. Such changes could halve food-related air emissions, help restore biodiversity and contain the risk of crossing several planetary boundaries. They could also halt further expansion of cropland and pasture. From a health perspective, a shift towards predominantly plant-based diets, combined with lower intakes of calories, sugar, salt, fat, red meat and ultra-processed foods, could reduce obesity and non-communicable diseases, potentially extending life expectancy by up to a decade and preventing an estimated 15 million premature deaths annually. Importantly, many of these interventions could generate benefits within months or years, making dietary change and nutrient recycling potentially much faster levers for transformation than changes to long-lived infrastructure such as cars and roads.","当前粮食生产和消费模式被广泛认为不可持续。本综述探讨了在保持在地球资源边界内的同时，将粮食系统转向健康膳食和保障粮食产量的机遇。基于对不同食物环境影响改进后的全球数据，我们采用系统视角审视健康、膳食与全球环境之间相互关联的纽带，尤其关注未来城市粮食系统的作用。随着全球人口日益城市化，城市有潜力重塑粮食系统和城市基础设施。我们的分析表明，如果膳食转向更多以植物为基础和无土栽培的食物，食物浪费大幅减少，且城市废物流中的养分作为补充肥料被回收利用，那么到本世纪末，地球仅需不到当今农业用地的一半就能养活约100亿人口。此类变化可使与食物相关的空气排放减半，有助于恢复生物多样性，并遏制跨越多个地球边界的风险。它们还可以阻止农田和牧场的进一步扩张。从健康角度看，转向以植物为主的膳食，结合降低热量、糖、盐、脂肪、红肉和超加工食品的摄入量，可以减少肥胖和非传染性疾病， potentially延长预期寿命长达十年，并每年防止约1500万例过早死亡。重要的是，许多此类干预措施可在数月或数年内产生效益，使得膳食改变和养分回收成为比改变汽车和道路等长寿命基础设施更快的转型杠杆。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,87,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":22},24,22,18,13,1,"基于全球数据的系统综述，提出植物基饮食、城市废弃物养分回收与减少浪费可在本世纪末以不足一半农地养活百亿人口，结论新颖且政策启示强，值得进入每日精选。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30,31],"可持续农业","城市农业","食物浪费","食物系统转型","植物基饮食","养分循环",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":47},[45,52,59,64],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":48,"abstract":49,"tags":51},6,true,[],[50,34],"生物多样性",[],{"code":53,"score":54,"supported":47,"title":55,"abstract":56,"tags":58},"F3",3,[],[57],"肥料",[],{"code":60,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":61,"abstract":62,"tags":63},"E2",[],[],[28],{"code":65,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":66,"abstract":67,"tags":68},"H8",[],[],[26],[70,71],"食物系统转型 可持续农业 植物基饮食 养分循环","食物系统转型 可持续农业","食物系统转型可持续农业植物基饮食养分循环-2751","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1881497",{"doi":73,"openalex_id":75,"authors":76,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":6,"card":80,"direction":84,"ingested_from":86},"W7213465358",[77],{"name":78,"orcid":9},"Jan-Olof Drangert",0,{"tldr":81,"method":82,"finding":83,"direction":84,"opportunity":85},"综述提出通过转向植物基饮食、减少浪费和回收城市养分，可在半量农地上养活百亿人并改善健康。","基于全球食物环境影响数据，采用系统视角分析健康、饮食与环境的关联。","植物基饮食加城市养分回收可减半食物排放、恢复生物多样性并每年避免1500万过早死亡。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究城市有机废弃物养分回收技术及植物基\u002F无土食物本地化生产系统的落地路径。","openalex","2026-09-17T23:30:07.297934Z",{"total":46,"page":21,"page_size":46,"items":89},[90,171,256,310,384,455],{"id":91,"title":92,"url":93,"summary":94,"summary_zh":95,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":93,"published_at":96,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":97,"score_detail":98,"sources":101,"tags":103,"primary_topic":108,"secondary_topics":109,"classification":110,"search_phrases":143,"slug":146,"view_count":79,"doi":147,"paper":148,"created_at":170},4869,"From life cycle assessment to life cycle thinking in agri-food systems: lessons from the avocado supply chain","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1875191","Agri-food systems face growing pressure to demonstrate environmental performance and support sustainability transitions. In this context, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) generates evidence on environmental impacts, while Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) helps integrate that information into decision-making across supply chains. This review evaluates LCA and LCT for the avocado sector by synthesising current LCA evidence, analysing the transferability of results to LCA‑based ecolabels and certifications, examining how LCT related food‑policy instruments create or limit incentives for supply‑chain actors and exploring pathways for translating life-cycle information into coordinated sustainability action. The assessment combines a systematic appraisal of English‑language avocado LCAs with regionally relevant studies, in Spanish and German, and field insights from sustained engagement with Ecuadorian producers. Avocado LCAs have expanded in number, supply chain and geographic coverage, consistently identifying production (e.g., fertilisation, fuel, energy use) and distribution (e.g., transport distances) as key environmental hotspots. Despite mounting pressure to reduce impacts, producers and distributors face limited incentives to move beyond compliance with non‑LCA certifications (e.g., GLOBALG.A.P., Rainforest Alliance). Retailers increasingly promote LCA‑based approaches, yet their efforts are hindered by data fragmentation, methodological inconsistency, and traceability challenges. Consumers express strong interest in environmental information, particularly when presented through simplified, multi‑criteria ecolabels, though such formats risk oversimplification or misrepresentation. Methodological gaps persist, including inconsistent treatment of carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and nursery stages, while opportunities in circularity and by‑product valorisation remain underexplored. Overall, LCT and LCA offer essential guidance for improving the sustainability of avocado supply chains, but their effectiveness depends on methodological standardisation, ecolabel harmonisation, clear policy direction, credible differentiation schemes, and robust data systems. By connecting environmental assessment with implementation, governance, and decision-making processes, this review outlines a pathway for embedding LCT within policy and practice, enabling more coherent, transparent, and actionable sustainability governance for agri-food supply chains.","农食系统正面临日益增大的压力，需展示其环境绩效并支持可持续性转型。在此背景下，生命周期评价（Life Cycle Assessment, LCA）为环境影响提供证据，而生命周期思维（Life Cycle Thinking, LCT）则有助于将这些信息整合到供应链各环节的决策中。本综述通过综合现有LCA证据、分析结果向基于LCA的生态标签和认证的可迁移性、考察与LCT相关的食品政策工具如何为供应链参与者创造或限制激励，以及探索将生命周期信息转化为协调可持续行动的路径，对牛油果行业的LCA和LCT进行了评估。该评估结合了对英语牛油果LCA的系统性评价、西班牙语和德语的相关区域研究，以及与厄瓜多尔生产者持续合作获得的实地见解。牛油果LCA在研究数量、供应链覆盖和地理范围上均有扩展，一致识别出生产环节（如施肥、燃料、能源使用）和分销环节（如运输距离）为关键环境热点。尽管减少环境影响的压力不断增大，生产者和分销商在超越非LCA认证（如GLOBALG.A.P.、雨林联盟）合规要求方面面临的激励仍然有限。零售商日益推广基于LCA的方法，但其努力受到数据碎片化、方法学不一致和可追溯性挑战的制约。消费者对环境信息表现出浓厚兴趣，尤其是当信息以简化的多标准生态标签形式呈现时，但此类形式存在过度简化或误导的风险。方法学空白依然存在，包括碳固存、生物多样性和苗圃阶段处理方式的不一致，而循环性和副产品增值方面的机遇仍未得到充分探索。总体而言，LCT和LCA为改善牛油果供应链的可持续性提供了重要指导，但其有效性取决于方法学标准化、生态标签协调、明确的政策方向、可信的差异化方案以及稳健的数据系统。通过将环境评估与实施、治理和决策过程相连接，本综述勾勒出一条将LCT嵌入政策与实践的路径，从而为农食供应链实现更协调、透明和可操作的可持续性治理。","2026-10-13T00:00:00Z",82,{"impact":19,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":99,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":100},14,"系统综述牛油果供应链LCA与生命周期思维，指出数据碎片化、方法不统一及生态标签激励不足，对农产品可持续治理与信息化追溯有参考价值。",[102],{"name":10,"url":93},[26,104,105,106,107],"牛油果","生命周期评价","农产品供应链","生态标签",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":111},{"candidates":112,"agricultural_evidence":47},[113,117,124,129,134,139],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":114,"abstract":115,"tags":116},[],[50,34],[],{"code":118,"score":119,"supported":47,"title":120,"abstract":121,"tags":123},"H4",4,[],[122],"carbon sequestration",[105],{"code":53,"score":54,"supported":47,"title":125,"abstract":126,"tags":128},[],[127],"施肥",[],{"code":130,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":131,"abstract":132,"tags":133},"B2",[],[],[104],{"code":135,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":136,"abstract":137,"tags":138},"E",[],[],[106],{"code":65,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":140,"abstract":141,"tags":142},[],[],[26],[144,145],"牛油果 供应链 生命周期评价","农产品供应链 生命周期评价 可持续农业 生态标签","牛油果供应链生命周期评价-4869","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1875191",{"doi":147,"openalex_id":149,"authors":150,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":93,"card":165,"direction":84,"ingested_from":86},"W7221595293",[151,153,156,158,160,162],{"name":152,"orcid":9},"Margarita Baquero",{"name":154,"orcid":155},"Villi Ieremia","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7106-0583",{"name":157,"orcid":9},"Anton Van Oyen",{"name":159,"orcid":9},"Beatriz Rivela",{"name":161,"orcid":9},"Annemie Geeraerd Ameryckx",{"name":163,"orcid":164},"Angel Diego Ramirez","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3846-3396",{"tldr":166,"method":167,"finding":168,"direction":84,"opportunity":169},"综述牛油果供应链LCA与生命周期思维，探讨如何将环境评估转化为可持续决策。","系统综述英文及西德文牛油果LCA研究，结合厄瓜多尔生产者实地调研。","生产与分销是环境热点，但数据碎片化、方法不一致和认证激励不足阻碍LCA落地。","可研究LCA标准化与生态标签协调机制，以及碳封存、生物多样性和副产物增值的方法学空白。","2026-10-14T23:30:06.874747Z",{"id":172,"title":173,"url":174,"summary":175,"summary_zh":176,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":174,"published_at":177,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":178,"score_detail":179,"sources":183,"tags":185,"primary_topic":190,"secondary_topics":196,"classification":198,"search_phrases":231,"slug":234,"view_count":227,"doi":235,"paper":236,"created_at":255},2133,"Agroecological transition and performance evaluation of rice farms in northern Benin based on the FAO TAPE framework","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1913786","Introduction Rice production systems in northern Benin face major challenges related to productivity, dependence on external inputs, and long-term sustainability. However, their agroecological transition pathways and multidimensional performance remain insufficiently documented. Methods This study applied the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE) to assess 438 rice farms classified into three production systems: Lowland Rice Systems (LRS), Rainfed Rice Systems (RRS), and Irrigated Rice Systems (IRS), using socio-economic, agronomic, and environmental indicators. Results TAPE Step 1, the Characterization of Agroecological Transition (CAET), revealed significant differences among production systems (Kruskal–Wallis test, p \u003C 0.05). IRS exhibited the highest agroecological transition, with six of the 10 Elements of Agroecology scoring above 50%, particularly Diversity (75%), Efficiency (60%), Recycling (60%), Synergies (55%), and Resilience (56%). RRS achieved an intermediate CAET score (40%), characterized by stronger performance in Diversity (55%), Circular & Solidarity Economy (50%), and Resilience (50%), but lower scores for Synergies, Efficiency, Responsible Governance, and Co-creation of Knowledge. LRS recorded the lowest CAET score (32%), with consistently low scores across most agroecological elements. Pairwise comparisons indicated significantly higher CAET scores in IRS than in LRS and RRS, whereas LRS and RRS did not differ significantly. TAPE Step 2 highlighted substantial heterogeneity among the 438 farms. The overall Performance Index ranged from -2 to +5, with a median of 0. Most farms performed well in Productivity and Added Value, while the majority exhibited undesirable performance for Income, Agricultural Biodiversity, and Soil Health. Discussion Agroecological transition is uneven and structurally differentiated across rice production systems in northern Benin. Although RRS displayed intermediate CAET scores, its overall transition level was not statistically distinguishable from LRS because of considerable within-system variability. The study confirms the relevance of TAPE as a robust diagnostic tool for identifying context-specific transition pathways and guiding agroecological strategies for sustainable rice production in West Africa.","引言 贝宁北部的稻作生产系统在生产能力、对外部投入的依赖以及长期可持续性方面面临重大挑战。然而，其农业生态转型路径及多维绩效仍缺乏充分记录。方法 本研究应用联合国粮食及农业组织的农业生态绩效评估工具（TAPE），利用社会经济、农艺和环境指标，对438个稻田农场进行评估，并将其分为三种生产系统：低地稻作系统（LRS）、雨养稻作系统（RRS）和灌溉稻作系统（IRS）。结果 TAPE第一步——农业生态转型特征描述（CAET）——揭示了不同生产系统之间的显著差异（Kruskal–Wallis检验，p \u003C 0.05）。IRS表现出最高的农业生态转型水平，在农业生态学10要素中有6项得分超过50%，尤其是多样性（75%）、效率（60%）、循环利用（60%）、协同作用（55%）和韧性（56%）。RRS的CAET得分为中等水平（40%），其特征是在多样性（55%）、循环与团结经济（50%）和韧性（50%）方面表现较强，但在协同作用、效率、负责任治理和知识共创方面得分较低。LRS的CAET得分最低（32%），在大多数农业生态要素上得分持续偏低。两两比较表明，IRS的CAET得分显著高于LRS和RRS，而LRS与RRS之间无显著差异。TAPE第二步揭示了438个农场之间存在显著异质性。总体绩效指数范围为-2至+5，中位数为0。大多数农场在生产力和附加值方面表现良好，而多数农场在收入、农业生物多样性和土壤健康方面表现不理想。讨论 贝宁北部稻作生产系统的农业生态转型不均衡，且存在结构性分化。尽管RRS显示出中等的CAET得分，但由于系统内变异性较大，其总体转型水平与LRS在统计上无法区分。本研究证实了TAPE作为一种稳健诊断工具的相关性，可用于识别因地制宜的转型路径，并指导西非可持续稻作生产的农业生态策略。","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":180,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":181,"relevant":21,"comment":182},15,8,"基于FAO TAPE框架对贝宁北部438个水稻农场进行多维评估，方法规范、数据扎实，对生态农业转型评价具有参考价值，但属区域案例研究，公共影响范围有限。",[184],{"name":10,"url":174},[26,186,187,188,189],"水稻种植","生态农业","农业评价体系","西非农业",{"code":191,"slug":192,"name":193,"path":194,"parent_code":195},"A1","rice","水稻","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Frice","A",[197],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":199},{"candidates":200,"agricultural_evidence":47},[201,206,213,220,226],{"code":191,"score":180,"supported":47,"title":202,"abstract":203,"tags":205},[192],[204,192],"稻田",[186],{"code":33,"score":207,"supported":47,"title":208,"abstract":209,"tags":212},9,[],[50,210,34,211],"农业生态","agroecology",[],{"code":214,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":215,"abstract":216,"tags":219},"H2",[],[217,218],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":221,"score":54,"supported":47,"title":222,"abstract":223,"tags":225},"H3",[],[224],"灌溉",[],{"code":65,"score":227,"supported":14,"title":228,"abstract":229,"tags":230},2,[],[],[26,187],[232,233],"农业评价体系 可持续农业 水稻种植 生态农业","农业评价体系 可持续农业","农业评价体系可持续农业水稻种植生态农业-2133","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1913786",{"doi":235,"openalex_id":237,"authors":238,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":174,"card":250,"direction":84,"ingested_from":86},"W7212143237",[239,241,243,245,247],{"name":240,"orcid":9},"Soufianou S. Kibissa",{"name":242,"orcid":9},"Ismainou A. Gbago",{"name":244,"orcid":9},"Bernus Z. Djigbe",{"name":246,"orcid":9},"Pierre G. Tovihoudji",{"name":248,"orcid":249},"Rodrigue V.C. Diogo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5348-5588",{"tldr":251,"method":252,"finding":253,"direction":84,"opportunity":254},"用FAO TAPE框架评估贝宁北部438个水稻农场的生态农业转型与多维表现。","FAO TAPE框架，438个农场分三类系统，社会经济农艺环境指标。","灌溉系统转型最高，雨养与低地无显著差异；收入、生物多样性和土壤健康普遍不佳。","可结合遥感与物联网长时序监测，量化TAPE指标动态，弥补单次调查的时空局限。","2026-09-11T23:30:08.063114Z",{"id":257,"title":258,"url":259,"summary":260,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":261,"source_url":259,"published_at":262,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":263,"score_detail":264,"sources":267,"tags":269,"primary_topic":271,"secondary_topics":272,"classification":277,"search_phrases":289,"slug":292,"view_count":54,"doi":293,"paper":294,"created_at":309},1272,"Biodiversity isn’t measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.32942\u002Fx28t1r","In this review, we articulate several important, but often overlooked concepts, trends, and perspectives in the biodiversity monitoring space, specifically in the context of transforming agriculture and the wider food system. We describe the common approaches to biodiversity monitoring — those focused on species, communities, functions, habitats, etc — and the methods and tools commonly used to track change. We then describe a set of fundamental ecological principles that are often overlooked by practitioners entering the agrobiodiversity space for the first time, particularly those with technical, industrial, and policy expertise in agriculture-adjacent fields who seek to incorporate biodiversity into their research and operations. For these practitioners, we discuss the importance of abundance, the timelines along which population trends can be quantitatively established, the geographical scales at which ecological interactions play out, and the implications therein for anyone looking to monitor the effect of farm management practices. We attempt to describe the complexities that arise when navigating the intersection of ecological, agricultural, and social systems, highlighting the multiple sets of voices, values, and priorities that come into play in this space. From intergovernmental panels to individual farmers, the agrobiodiversity space holds a multitude of arenas of where decisions are made. We raise the question of “why, how, and for whom are we monitoring biodiversity?” to encourage practitioners new to this space to consider the implications of their approach. Finally, we discuss the conflicts and trade-offs that emerge in the intersection of productivity, profits, carbon and biodiversity, and explore the challenges in finding a balance between them in the transition toward a more sustainable form of agriculture.","OpenAlex","2026-08-28T00:00:00Z",73,{"impact":19,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":265,"freshness":54,"relevant":21,"comment":266},12,"综述性论文，系统梳理农业生物多样性监测的概念、方法与挑战，对农业可持续发展有参考价值。",[268],{"name":261,"url":259},[26,210,50,270],"监测方法",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[273],{"code":65,"slug":274,"name":275,"path":276,"parent_code":37},"sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture",{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":278},{"candidates":279,"agricultural_evidence":47},[280,284],{"code":33,"score":20,"supported":47,"title":281,"abstract":282,"tags":283},[34],[34],[210,50],{"code":65,"score":207,"supported":47,"title":285,"abstract":287,"tags":288},[286],"sustainable agriculture",[],[26],[290,291],"可持续农业 生物多样性 农业生态 监测方法","可持续农业 生物多样性","可持续农业生物多样性农业生态监测方法-1272","10.32942\u002Fx28t1r",{"doi":293,"openalex_id":295,"authors":296,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":302,"card":303,"direction":308,"ingested_from":86},"W7204518041",[297,300],{"name":298,"orcid":299},"Iqbal Singh Bhalla","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5611-8361",{"name":301,"orcid":9},"Philip Loring","https:\u002F\u002Fecoevorxiv.org\u002Frepository\u002Fobject\u002F14661\u002Fdownload\u002F25513\u002F",{"tldr":304,"method":305,"finding":306,"direction":84,"opportunity":307},"综述农业生物多样性监测的概念、方法、原则及权衡，强调监测目的与尺度。","综述常见监测方法（物种、群落等）及工具，讨论生态原则与多系统交叉。","监测需关注丰度、时间尺度、地理尺度，并权衡生产力、碳与生物多样性。","可研究农业管理措施对生物多样性的多尺度影响，及权衡碳与生物多样性的决策模型。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-09-01T04:03:13.203738Z",{"id":311,"title":312,"url":313,"summary":314,"summary_zh":315,"content":9,"source_name":316,"source_url":313,"published_at":317,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":178,"score_detail":318,"sources":322,"tags":324,"primary_topic":330,"secondary_topics":334,"classification":336,"search_phrases":358,"slug":361,"view_count":79,"doi":362,"paper":363,"created_at":383},5392,"Wetland Loss Associated with Hydro-Agricultural Development in North African Floodplains: Insights from a Historical Cartographic Analysis of the Gharb Plain (Morocco)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fd18100642","Mediterranean floodplain wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural intensification and hydrological modifications. In North Africa, most of these wetlands have been converted to agricultural lands using an extensive ‘drainage–irrigation’ process that has irreversibly degraded them. This study documents this loss through the illustrative example of the Gharb Plain in the northwest of Morocco. The agricultural development process of this plain, initiated in 1927 and only recently completed, is documented by both historical maps and remote sensing data, which we combined to reconstruct the simultaneous wetland decline and agriculture extension. The results reveal a dramatic decline in marshland ecosystems, covering about 88% of the original marshlands in less than one cycle. Several wetlands, including large ones, have entirely disappeared, particularly within the Sebou and Baht river floodplains. To ensure their human occupation, the drainage process and river canalization have been supported by a large program of dam construction upstream of the Gharb Plain. The wetland loss estimate highlights the substantial ecological costs of agricultural intensification and underscores the need for integrated management strategies balancing food production and patrimony conservation. Future research should focus on wetland restoration, ecosystem service assessment, and climate-resilient water management in Mediterranean floodplains.","地中海洪泛平原湿地是最具生产力的生态系统之一，却日益受到农业集约化与水文改造的威胁。在北非，大多数此类湿地已通过大规模的“排水—灌溉”过程被转变为农业用地，并因此遭到不可逆的退化。本研究以摩洛哥西北部加尔卜平原（Gharb Plain）为例，记录了这一丧失过程。该平原的农业开发进程始于1927年，直至近期才告完成，我们结合历史地图与遥感数据，重建了湿地衰退与农业扩张同步发生的过程。结果表明，沼泽生态系统急剧减少，在不到一个周期内约88%的原生沼泽地消失。包括大型湿地在内的多处湿地已完全消失，尤其是在塞布河（Sebou）与巴赫特河（Baht）洪泛平原内。为保障人类占用，排水过程与河流渠化得到了加尔卜平原上游大规模水坝建设计划的支持。湿地丧失的估算凸显了农业集约化所带来的巨大生态代价，并强调需要制定兼顾粮食生产与遗产保护的综合管理策略。未来研究应聚焦于湿地恢复、生态系统服务评估以及地中海洪泛平原的气候韧性水资源管理。","Diversity","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",{"impact":319,"substance":320,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":181,"relevant":21,"comment":321},16,21,"该研究结合历史地图与遥感数据，量化了北非洪泛平原湿地因农业开发而丧失的情况，方法扎实、结论明确，对农业生态与土地管理有参考价值，但属区域性案例研究，公共影响有限。",[323],{"name":316,"url":313},[325,326,327,328,329],"生态修复","遥感监测","灌溉农业","土地利用变化","湿地保护",{"code":221,"slug":331,"name":332,"path":333,"parent_code":37},"irrigation","水资源与灌溉","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Firrigation",[335],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":337},{"candidates":338,"agricultural_evidence":47},[339,344,350],{"code":221,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":340,"abstract":341,"tags":343},[],[224,342,331],"水资源",[327],{"code":33,"score":207,"supported":47,"title":345,"abstract":346,"tags":349},[],[347,348],"生态系统服务","ecosystem service",[328,329,325],{"code":351,"score":352,"supported":47,"title":353,"abstract":354,"tags":357},"I3",7,[],[355,356],"遥感","remote sensing",[326],[359,360],"Gharb平原 湿地 遥感","摩洛哥 湿地 灌溉","Gharb平原湿地遥感-5392","10.3390\u002Fd18100642",{"doi":362,"openalex_id":364,"authors":365,"venue":316,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":313,"card":377,"direction":381,"ingested_from":86},"W7222966485",[366,369,371,374],{"name":367,"orcid":368},"Mohamed Dakki","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8042-3972",{"name":370,"orcid":9},"Said El Falah",{"name":372,"orcid":373},"Ibrahim Makrane","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-9201-206X",{"name":375,"orcid":376},"Ismail Mansouri","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3679-6050",{"tldr":378,"method":379,"finding":380,"direction":381,"opportunity":382},"用历史地图与遥感重建摩洛哥Gharb平原1927年以来的湿地丧失与农业扩张过程。","历史地图与遥感数据结合，重建湿地退缩与农田扩张的时空过程。","不到一个开发周期内约88%的原生沼泽消失，大型湿地完全丧失。","农业遥感与作物表型","可延伸至地中海洪泛平原湿地恢复优先区识别与生态系统服务权衡研究。","2026-10-20T23:30:19.135602Z",{"id":385,"title":386,"url":387,"summary":388,"summary_zh":389,"content":9,"source_name":390,"source_url":387,"published_at":391,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":392,"score_detail":393,"sources":395,"tags":397,"primary_topic":402,"secondary_topics":403,"classification":409,"search_phrases":427,"slug":430,"view_count":21,"doi":431,"paper":432,"created_at":454},5163,"Ecological indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem responses to climate change in agroecology and nature-based solutions: a scoping review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685","Climate change reshapes biodiversity patterns and ecosystem processes across scales. However, ecological indicators used to track these changes remain uneven in structure and application. This study maps and synthesizes indicators applied in agroecology and nature-based solutions (NbS) for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem responses under climate change. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering literature from 2003 to 2026. From a final dataset of 89 sources, data were extracted through a structured coding framework and synthesized using an Indicator–Scale–Response matrix and an Indicator Application Index. Findings show shared reliance on indicators such as species diversity, ecosystem productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services, and resilience. Differences emerge in how these indicators are applied. Agroecology prioritizes process-based and field-level measurements grounded in local ecological interactions, while NbS emphasizes standardized and scalable metrics linked to monitoring and reporting systems. Cross-scale integration remains uneven, particularly in connecting species-level responses with ecosystem and landscape indicators. Remote sensing and Essential Biodiversity Variables provide emerging pathways for linking scales, though field integration remains partial. Results point to fragmented indicator systems that limit coherent ecological assessment across management contexts. Strengthening alignment between field observations and scalable monitoring approaches could improve comparability and usability of ecological indicators for climate adaptation and ecosystem management in agricultural landscapes.","气候变化重塑了跨尺度的生物多样性模式与生态系统过程。然而，用于追踪这些变化的生态指标在结构和应用上仍不均衡。本研究梳理并综合了农业生态学与基于自然的解决方案（NbS）中用于评估气候变化下生物多样性与生态系统响应的指标。采用PRISMA-ScR指南开展范围综述，检索Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar，覆盖2003年至2026年的文献。从最终89篇文献构成的数据集中，通过结构化编码框架提取数据，并运用“指标—尺度—响应”矩阵和指标应用指数进行综合。研究结果表明，各领域共同依赖物种多样性、生态系统生产力、碳动态、生态系统服务和恢复力等指标，但在指标应用方式上存在差异。农业生态学侧重于基于过程和田块尺度的测量，根植于地方生态相互作用；而NbS强调与监测和报告体系相关联的标准化、可扩展的度量指标。跨尺度整合仍不均衡，尤其是在将物种层面响应与生态系统及景观指标相衔接方面。遥感与基本生物多样性变量（Essential Biodiversity Variables）为连接尺度提供了新兴路径，但野外观测的整合仍不充分。研究结果揭示出指标体系的碎片化，限制了跨管理情境下一致的生态评估。加强野外观测与可扩展监测方法之间的衔接，有望提升生态指标在农业景观气候适应与生态系统管理中的可比性和可用性。","Ecological Indicators","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",64,{"impact":181,"substance":19,"depth":319,"authority":20,"freshness":207,"relevant":21,"comment":394},"该综述系统梳理了农业生态学与NbS中生物多样性及生态系统响应的指标，方法规范、结论有参考价值，但属学术综述，产业与政策影响有限，适合作为专业资讯而非每日精选头条。",[396],{"name":390,"url":387},[398,50,399,400,401],"气候变化","农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案","生态指标",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[404],{"code":405,"slug":406,"name":407,"path":408,"parent_code":37},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":410},{"candidates":411,"agricultural_evidence":47},[412,417,423],{"code":33,"score":413,"supported":47,"title":414,"abstract":415,"tags":416},27,[34,211],[50,210,347,34,211],[399,50],{"code":405,"score":19,"supported":47,"title":418,"abstract":420,"tags":422},[419],"climate change",[398,421,419],"气候适应",[398],{"code":351,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":424,"abstract":425,"tags":426},[],[355,356],[],[428,429],"基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学 生物多样性 气候变化","基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案农业生态学生物多样性气候变化-5163","10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685",{"doi":431,"openalex_id":433,"authors":434,"venue":390,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":387,"card":449,"direction":381,"ingested_from":86},"W7222588017",[435,438,441,444,446],{"name":436,"orcid":437},"Eliakira Kisetu Nassary","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7327-4366",{"name":439,"orcid":440},"Mawazo Jamson Shitindi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5579-902X",{"name":442,"orcid":443},"Aneth Japhet Magubika","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8910-1953",{"name":445,"orcid":9},"Esta Alfred Mhagama",{"name":447,"orcid":448},"Newton Lwiyiso Kilasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4721-7691",{"tldr":450,"method":451,"finding":452,"direction":84,"opportunity":453},"综述农业生态与NbS中生物多样性和生态系统气候响应指标的应用差异。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，检索2003-2026年89篇文献，构建指标-尺度","两类领域指标依赖相似但应用分化，跨尺度整合不足，指标系统碎片化。","可研究田间观测与遥感EBV衔接的跨尺度指标框架，提升农业景观气候适应评估可比性。","2026-10-17T23:30:28.181936Z",{"id":456,"title":457,"url":458,"summary":459,"summary_zh":460,"content":9,"source_name":461,"source_url":458,"published_at":462,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":463,"score_detail":464,"sources":467,"tags":469,"primary_topic":475,"secondary_topics":476,"classification":478,"search_phrases":493,"slug":496,"view_count":79,"doi":497,"paper":498,"created_at":518},5101,"Advances in Cerrado and tropical grassland plant biology – diversity, functioning, resilience and conservation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331","Abstract Background Tropical grasslands and savannas are ancient, highly diverse ecosystems that support important ecological processes, ecosystem services and human livelihoods, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural expansion, altered fire regimes, invasive species and climate change. The Cerrado, the largest savanna-dominated region in the Neotropics, exemplifies both the exceptional biological diversity and vulnerability of tropical open ecosystems. Despite major advances in plant ecology and evolution, important gaps remain in understanding how plants and plant communities respond to environmental change and disturbance. Scope We review recent advances in plant biology in the Cerrado and other tropical grasslands, covering their evolution, vegetation patterns, plant–animal interactions, functional ecology, responses to fire and environmental change, and restoration and conservation. We consider processes from plant traits and physiological responses to community and ecosystem dynamics, examining how environmental and biotic factors shape the diversity, functioning and resilience of tropical grassy ecosystems. Conclusions Recent advances reinforce the value of tropical grasslands as model systems for advancing fundamental plant science while providing knowledge relevant to their conservation and restoration. Future research should better integrate -omics, functional and evolutionary approaches with long-term monitoring, remote sensing and predictive modelling to understand plant responses to climate change, land-use intensification and changing disturbance regimes. Plant research can also contribute to ecosystem restoration, sustainable land management and climate adaptation. Greater recognition of native plant diversity as a resource for sustainable bioeconomies and local livelihoods can further connect biodiversity conservation with societal needs.","摘要 背景 热带草原和稀树草原是古老且高度多样的生态系统，支撑着重要的生态过程、生态系统服务与人类生计，然而它们正日益受到农业扩张、火 regime 改变、入侵物种和气候变化的威胁。塞拉多（Cerrado）是新热带地区最大的以稀树草原为主的区域，集中体现了热带开放生态系统卓越的生物多样性与脆弱性。尽管植物生态学和进化研究已取得重大进展，但在理解植物及植物群落如何响应环境变化和干扰方面仍存在重要空白。 范围 我们综述了塞拉多及其他热带草原植物生物学的最新进展，涵盖其进化、植被格局、植物–动物相互作用、功能生态学、对火和环境变化的响应，以及恢复与保护。我们考察了从植物性状和生理响应到群落和生态系统动态的过程，审视环境和生物因素如何塑造热带草类生态系统的多样性、功能和恢复力。 结论 最新进展强化了热带草原作为推进基础植物科学模型系统的价值，同时提供了与其保护和恢复相关的知识。未来研究应更好地整合组学、功能和进化方法，与长期监测、遥感和预测建模相结合，以理解植物对气候变化、土地利用集约化和干扰 regime 变化的响应。植物研究还可为生态系统恢复、可持续土地管理和气候适应作出贡献。进一步认识本土植物多样性作为可持续生物经济和当地生计资源的价值，可将生物多样性保护与社会需求更紧密地联系起来。","Annals of Botany","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":265,"substance":465,"depth":19,"authority":99,"freshness":181,"relevant":21,"comment":466},20,"核心期刊综述，系统梳理热带草原植物多样性、功能与保护研究进展，学术价值高但与国内农业信息化直接关联有限。",[468],{"name":461,"url":458},[470,471,472,473,474],"生态保护","热带草原","稀树草原","植物多样性","退化草地恢复",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[477],{"code":405,"slug":406,"name":407,"path":408,"parent_code":37},{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":479},{"candidates":480,"agricultural_evidence":47},[481,485,489],{"code":33,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":482,"abstract":483,"tags":484},[],[50,347,34],[470],{"code":405,"score":207,"supported":47,"title":486,"abstract":487,"tags":488},[],[398,421,419],[],{"code":351,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":490,"abstract":491,"tags":492},[],[355,356],[],[494,495],"Cerrado 稀树草原 植物生物学","热带草原 植物多样性 保护","Cerrado稀树草原植物生物学-5101","10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331",{"doi":497,"openalex_id":499,"authors":500,"venue":461,"cited_by_count":79,"oa_url":9,"card":513,"direction":381,"ingested_from":86},"W7222330485",[501,504,507,510],{"name":502,"orcid":503},"Robert G. Miller","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5798-4552",{"name":505,"orcid":506},"Augusto César Franco","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0869-5989",{"name":508,"orcid":509},"Cássia Beatriz Rodrigues Munhoz","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7990-6715",{"name":511,"orcid":512},"Marcelo Fragomeni Simon","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5732-1716",{"tldr":514,"method":515,"finding":516,"direction":381,"opportunity":517},"综述塞拉多及热带草原植物生物学进展，涵盖多样性、功能、恢复力与保护。","文献综述，整合组学、功能与进化方法及长期监测、遥感、预测模型。","热带草原是基础植物科学模型系统，需整合多手段理解植物对环境变化的响应。","将遥感与预测模型用于热带草原植物功能性状监测，填补长期动态与恢复力评估空白。","2026-10-16T23:30:31.368451Z"]