[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3139":3,"related-3139":106},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":60,"slug":63,"view_count":64,"doi":65,"paper":66,"created_at":105},3139,"Why are farmers in South India shifting from conventional ‘Green Revolution’ agriculture to natural farming?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834351","Introduction The Green Revolution contributed to significant increases in crop production and yield in India. However, it also resulted in negative social and environmental consequences. In response, alternative farming practices have emerged, based on agroecological principles, such as natural farming. In recent years, government policies at state and national levels have promoted natural farming. However, anecdotal evidence suggests its adoption by farmers has been limited and uneven. The aim of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators involved in transitioning to natural farming in India in the context of a government natural farming program at the early stages of implementation. Methods An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. Eleven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in six villages across Anakapalli and Visakhapatnam districts of Andhra Pradesh from March to May 2023. FGD transcripts were coded and analyzed using a constant comparative method. Subsequently, a questionnaire was developed based on the FGD findings and administered to heads of 1,126 households across 82 villages in four districts in Andhra Pradesh from October to November 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analyzed separately and subsequently integrated using the ‘Diffusion of Innovations’ theory. Results Adoption rates of natural farming were low after the first few months of training, with just 23 out of 1,126 households adopting any natural farming practices. Farmers perceived that health benefits were a relative advantage of adopting natural farming over conventional farming. Internal community resource persons (iCRPs) and presentations on a Pico projector (i.e., handheld projector)emerged as predominant channels of communication. Preexisting institutional architecture in the form of women’s self-help groups contributed to an enabling social system. However, a lack of decentralized input supply, weak market linkages, perceived yield penalties and the labor- and knowledge-intensive nature of natural farming were key barriers. Conclusion The study highlights the importance of understanding the diverse motivations of farmers to adopt natural farming. Modeling peer-to-peer learning, use of mass media, and decentralized input supply may lead to improvement in natural farming uptake. Tailoring policies to address specific needs of conventional and natural farmers will likely facilitate a smoother transition to natural farming.","引言 绿色革命促进了印度作物生产和产量的显著增长。然而，它也带来了负面的社会和环境后果。作为回应，基于农业生态原则的替代性耕作方式应运而生，例如自然农法。近年来，邦和国家层面的政府政策推动了自然农法的发展。然而，零星证据表明，农民对其采用程度有限且不均衡。本研究旨在了解在政府自然农法项目实施的早期阶段背景下，印度农民向自然农法转型所面临的障碍和促进因素。方法 采用探索性序贯混合方法设计。2023年3月至5月，在安得拉邦阿纳卡帕利和维沙卡帕特南地区的6个村庄开展了11次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）。对焦点小组讨论转录稿采用持续比较法进行编码和分析。随后，基于焦点小组讨论的发现开发了一份问卷，并于2023年10月至11月对安得拉邦4个地区82个村庄的1，126户家庭户主进行了调查。定性和定量发现分别进行分析，随后运用“创新扩散”理论进行整合。结果 在培训开始后的最初几个月，自然农法的采用率较低，1，126户家庭中仅有23户采用了任何自然农法实践。农民认为健康效益是采用自然农法相对于常规农业的相对优势。内部社区资源人员（iCRPs）和Pico投影仪（即手持投影仪）演示成为主要传播渠道。以妇女自助小组形式存在的既有制度架构促成了有利的社会系统。然而，缺乏分散化投入品供应、市场联系薄弱、感知到的产量损失以及自然农法劳动力和知识密集的特性是主要障碍。结论 本研究强调了了解农民采用自然农法多元动机的重要性。模拟同伴学习、利用大众媒体以及分散化投入品供应可能有助于提高自然农法的采用率。针对常规农民和自然农民的具体需求制定政策，可能有助于促进向自然农法的更平稳转型。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,82,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":21},18,22,14,1,"基于1126户问卷与焦点小组的混合方法研究，揭示印度自然农业推广的低采纳率及制度性障碍，对农业绿色转型政策有参考价值。",[23],{"name":10,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"农户采纳","农业政策","农业转型","印度农业","自然农业",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,50,55],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":49},3,true,[],[48],"农业生态",[],{"code":51,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":52,"abstract":53,"tags":54},"G2",[],[],[25],{"code":56,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":57,"abstract":58,"tags":59},"J3",[],[],[28],[61,62],"印度 自然农业 农户采纳","农业政策 农业转型 农户采纳 印度农业","印度自然农业农户采纳-3139",5,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834351",{"doi":65,"openalex_id":67,"authors":68,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":6,"card":98,"direction":102,"ingested_from":104},"W7213914303",[69,71,73,75,78,81,83,86,89,92,95],{"name":70,"orcid":9},"Bharath Yandrapu",{"name":72,"orcid":9},"Sheril Rajan",{"name":74,"orcid":9},"John Norrie",{"name":76,"orcid":77},"Peter Craig","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7653-5832",{"name":79,"orcid":80},"Sailesh Mohan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1853-3596",{"name":82,"orcid":9},"Alfred Gathorne-Hardy",{"name":84,"orcid":85},"Michael Eddleston","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6857-3441",{"name":87,"orcid":88},"Ranjit Kumar","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1627-2943",{"name":90,"orcid":91},"Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4037-6371",{"name":93,"orcid":94},"Poornima Prabhakaran","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3134-7026",{"name":96,"orcid":9},"Prof Lindsay M. Jaacks",0,{"tldr":99,"method":100,"finding":101,"direction":102,"opportunity":103},"研究印度南安得拉邦农民从绿色革命农业转向自然农业的障碍与促进因素。","混合方法：11场焦点小组+1126户问卷，用创新扩散理论整合分析。","采纳率极低（1126户仅23户），健康益处是主要动力，缺投入品供应和市场链接是障碍。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究数字工具（如Pico投影仪、同伴学习）如何提升自然农业采纳率与市场对接。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:07.656930Z",{"total":107,"page":20,"page_size":107,"items":108},6,[109,173,243,321,397,468],{"id":110,"title":111,"url":112,"summary":113,"summary_zh":114,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":112,"published_at":115,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":116,"score_detail":117,"sources":122,"tags":124,"primary_topic":129,"secondary_topics":130,"classification":131,"search_phrases":153,"slug":156,"view_count":97,"doi":157,"paper":158,"created_at":172},4411,"Agroecology in West Africa: the pathway towards a sustainable transition of agri-food systems? A review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044","This article reviews the state of the art on the potential of agroecology to contribute to the sustainable transformation of agrifood systems in West Africa. Data were retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and grey literature. The 484 publications reviewed span the last 25 years, focusing primarily on West Africa, while selected studies from other regions were included where relevant to the analysis. Over the past two decades, agroecology has gained a growing interest in different scientific fields, and is increasingly discussed as an alternative approach to conventional agricultural models. The reviewed evidence suggests that several agroecological practices are rooted in local knowledge and may contribute to addressing some of the environmental and food-systems challenges facing the region. However, the nature and the magnitude of these contributions remain context-dependent and unevenly documented across the region. Existing studies point to potential benefits for agricultural resilience, food security and nutrition, biodiversity, socioeconomic viability, human values, but the available evidence remains insufficient to highlight the potential of agroecology for food systems transformation. Scaling up agroecology is further constrained by interrelated challenges, including limited training and advisory services, restricted access to inputs and markets, and policy support. In many regions, research on agroecology has covered only a limited range of topics, highlighting the need for more context-specific and multidimensional science. Future studies should investigate the conditions under which agroecological transitions are most likely to succeed, including the interactions among policy support, training, resource access, markets, and economic incentives. Greater attention is also needed to its socioeconomic viability and to the development of locally adapted advisory and support services.","本文综述了农业生态学在西非农食系统可持续转型中潜在贡献的研究现状。数据检索自Scopus、PubMed、Google Scholar及灰色文献。所综述的484篇出版物时间跨度涵盖过去25年，主要聚焦西非，同时酌情纳入了其他区域与分析相关的精选研究。过去二十年间，农业生态学在不同科学领域日益受到关注，并越来越多地作为替代常规农业模式的方案被讨论。综述证据表明，若干农业生态实践根植于地方知识，可能有助于应对该地区面临的部分环境与食物系统挑战。然而，这些贡献的性质与程度仍取决于具体情境，且在该地区的记录并不均衡。现有研究指出了其在农业韧性、粮食安全与营养、生物多样性、社会经济可行性、人类价值等方面的潜在益处，但现有证据仍不足以凸显农业生态学对食物系统转型的潜力。农业生态学的推广还受到相互关联的制约因素限制，包括培训与推广服务有限、投入品与市场准入受限以及政策支持不足。在许多地区，农业生态学研究仅涉及有限的主题范围，凸显了开展更具情境针对性和多维度的科学研究的必要性。未来研究应探讨农业生态转型最有可能成功的条件，包括政策支持、培训、资源获取、市场与经济激励之间的相互作用。还需更多关注其社会经济可行性以及因地制宜的推广与支持服务的发展。","2026-10-07T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":118,"substance":119,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":120,"relevant":20,"comment":121},12,20,8,"基于484篇文献的系统综述，指出生态农业在西非的潜力与证据不足，属细分领域学术进展，公共影响有限。",[123],{"name":10,"url":112},[125,27,126,127,128],"粮食安全","生态农业","西非农业","农食系统",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":132},{"candidates":133,"agricultural_evidence":45},[134,141,148],{"code":31,"score":135,"supported":45,"title":136,"abstract":138,"tags":140},17,[137],"agroecology",[139,48,32,137],"生物多样性",[],{"code":142,"score":143,"supported":45,"title":144,"abstract":145,"tags":147},"A8",7,[],[125,146],"food security",[125],{"code":149,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":150,"abstract":151,"tags":152},"H8",[],[],[126],[154,155],"西非 生态农业 农食系统","农业转型 农食系统 生态农业 粮食安全","西非生态农业农食系统-4411","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044",{"doi":157,"openalex_id":159,"authors":160,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":166,"card":167,"direction":102,"ingested_from":104},"W7220841560",[161,163],{"name":162,"orcid":9},"Bernadin Djossou",{"name":164,"orcid":165},"Pascal Gbénou","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-8498-7390","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":168,"method":169,"finding":170,"direction":102,"opportunity":171},"综述西非农业生态学25年研究，评估其推动农食系统可持续转型的潜力与局限。","检索Scopus等数据库及灰色文献，系统综述484篇相关论文。","农业生态实践有助应对环境与粮食挑战，但证据不足且受培训、市场与政策制约。","可研究政策、培训、市场与激励的交互作用，明确农业生态转型成功的具体条件。","2026-10-08T23:30:07.324467Z",{"id":174,"title":175,"url":176,"summary":177,"summary_zh":178,"content":9,"source_name":179,"source_url":176,"published_at":180,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":181,"is_selected":14,"score":182,"score_detail":183,"sources":186,"tags":190,"primary_topic":194,"secondary_topics":195,"classification":196,"search_phrases":225,"slug":228,"view_count":229,"doi":230,"paper":231,"created_at":242},4034,"D1.5 – Policy recommendations","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858","PrAEctiCe presents policy recommendations for advancing agroecology and climate-resilient food systems in East Africa. It highlights evidence generated through stakeholder mapping, agroecological practice profiling, co-creation, indicator framework development, digital decision-support tools, and Living Labs in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The recommendations focus on strengthening agroecology policies, integrated agriculture–aquaculture, renewable energy, circular nutrient systems, digital agriculture, data governance, inclusive financing, youth and gender participation, and justicesensitive transitions. The document also describes dissemination through national, continental and AU–EU policy events, aligning the recommendations with CAADP, Agenda 2063, the EU Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy.","PrAEctiCe提出了在东非推进农业生态学和气候韧性食物系统的政策建议。该文件重点介绍了通过利益相关者映射、农业生态实践画像、共同创造、指标框架开发、数字决策支持工具以及在肯尼亚、乌干达和坦桑尼亚开展的“生活实验室”（Living Labs）所生成的证据。建议聚焦于加强农业生态政策、农业—水产养殖一体化、可再生能源、循环养分系统、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资、青年与性别参与，以及具有正义敏感性的转型。文件还介绍了通过国家、非洲大陆及非盟—欧盟政策活动进行传播的情况，并将这些建议与CAADP、2063年议程、欧盟绿色协议和“从农场到餐桌”战略相衔接。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-01T00:00:00Z",25,80,{"impact":18,"substance":119,"depth":135,"authority":184,"freshness":120,"relevant":20,"comment":185},13,"欧盟项目面向东非的生态农业与数字农业政策建议，含指标框架与决策支持工具，对农业信息化政策研究有参考价值。",[187,188],{"name":179,"url":176},{"name":179,"url":189},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082859",[191,26,192,126,193],"数字农业","数据治理","东非农业",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":197},{"candidates":198,"agricultural_evidence":45},[199,205,212,216,220],{"code":200,"score":143,"supported":45,"title":201,"abstract":202,"tags":204},"I1",[],[191,203],"digital agriculture",[191],{"code":206,"score":107,"supported":45,"title":207,"abstract":208,"tags":211},"D",[],[209,210],"水产","aquaculture",[],{"code":31,"score":107,"supported":45,"title":213,"abstract":214,"tags":215},[],[48,137],[],{"code":149,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":217,"abstract":218,"tags":219},[],[],[126],{"code":221,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":222,"abstract":223,"tags":224},"I6",[],[],[192],[226,227],"PrAEctiCe 政策建议","东非 生态农业 气候韧性","PrAEctiCe政策建议-4034",2,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858",{"doi":230,"openalex_id":232,"authors":233,"venue":179,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":176,"card":236,"direction":240,"ingested_from":104},"W7215062811",[234],{"name":235,"orcid":9},"Emmanuel Okalany",{"tldr":237,"method":238,"finding":239,"direction":240,"opportunity":241},"为东非农业生态与气候韧性食物系统提出政策建议，基于多国实证与数字工具。","利益相关者映射、共同创造、指标框架、数字决策支持与生活实验室。","建议涵盖农业生态政策、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资及青年性别参与。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究数字决策工具在东非小农场景的落地效果与数据治理机制。","2026-10-02T23:30:30.857763Z",{"id":244,"title":245,"url":246,"summary":247,"summary_zh":248,"content":9,"source_name":179,"source_url":246,"published_at":249,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":181,"is_selected":14,"score":250,"score_detail":251,"sources":253,"tags":257,"primary_topic":261,"secondary_topics":267,"classification":269,"search_phrases":297,"slug":300,"view_count":20,"doi":301,"paper":302,"created_at":320},1906,"FORTUNA Deliverable 4.2 – Pathways from research gaps to the Fortuna scenarios","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22643575","Please note that this deliverable has not yet been approved by the European Commission. This deliverable contributes to the development of the FORTUNA Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) by establishing implementation pathways that link research and innovation (R&I) priorities to the FORTUNA scenarios for reducing pesticide use in European agriculture. Building on Deliverable D4.1, which developed future scenarios, identified research and innovation knowledge gaps, and defined intermediary actions, this report completes the pathway by identifying the expected alternative solutions and R&I outputs that could emerge from addressing these knowledge gaps. It also examines how the previously identified intermediary actions should be prioritised over time to support the implementation of the 50% pesticide-use reduction scenario by 2030 and the pesticide-free scenario by 2050.The analysis is based on Workshop 5 of the FORTUNA project, which brought together 40 participants from 27 organisations across 16 European countries, representing research, advisory services, farmers' organisations, policymakers and agri-food value chain actors. Participants worked in three groups corresponding to the project's cropping systems—arable, vegetable and perennial crops. For each cropping system and transition scenario, they first translated the previously identified knowledge gaps into expected alternative solutions, including prototypes, demonstrators and research outputs. They then discussed the intermediary actions identified in earlier workshops, prioritised these actions along a timeline, and identified the main actors responsible for their implementation and the stakeholders expected to benefit from them. This process resulted in implementation pathways connecting research outputs to the long-term transition scenarios.Across the three cropping systems, participants agreed that reducing pesticide dependence requires more than the development of new technologies. Future research should support integrated solutions combining resistant varieties, biological control, agroecological approaches, biodiversity-based management and digital technologies for monitoring and decision support. However, the successful implementation of these solutions also depends on enabling conditions beyond research itself, including effective advisory services, farmer training, demonstration activities, supportive regulatory frameworks, financial incentives, functioning value chains and greater consumer awareness. These complementary actions were consistently identified as essential for facilitating the uptake and scaling of research outcomes.The comparison of the two scenarios revealed different implementation pathways. The 50% pesticide-use reduction scenario represents an incremental transition that builds on existing farming systems by strengthening integrated pest management (IPM), improving knowledge transfer, increasing the adoption of biological control and digital technologies, and supporting farmers through targeted policy measures. In contrast, the pesticide-free scenario requires a more fundamental transformation of agricultural systems. It involves the redesign of cropping systems based on agroecological principles, greater crop diversification, stronger landscape-scale coordination, reorganisation of value chains, stable markets rewarding sustainable production, and broader societal support through coherent long-term policies and consumer engagement.Despite differences between cropping systems and scenarios, several common messages emerged. First, research and innovation must be embedded within broader implementation pathways that anticipate the institutional, economic and social conditions necessary for the uptake of alternative solutions. Second, advisory services, demonstration farms and participatory knowledge exchange are fundamental to accelerating adoption by farmers. Third, long-term policy commitment, appropriate regulatory frameworks and targeted financial support are required to reduce transition risks and create favourable conditions for innovation. Finally, the transition towards reduced pesticide use depends on coordinated action involving researchers, policymakers, farmers, advisory organisations, industry and consumers.","请注意，本交付成果尚未获得欧盟委员会批准。本交付成果通过建立将研究与创新（R&I）优先事项与FORTUNA减少欧洲农业农药使用情景相连接的实施方案路径，为FORTUNA战略研究与创新议程（SRIA）的制定作出贡献。在D4.1交付成果（该成果开发了未来情景、识别了研究与创新知识缺口并界定了中间行动）的基础上，本报告通过识别应对这些知识缺口可能产生的预期替代解决方案及R&I产出，完成了该路径的构建。报告还探讨了先前识别的中间行动应如何随时间进行优先排序，以支持到2030年实现农药使用量减少50%的情景以及到2050年实现无农药情景的实施。\n\n本分析基于FORTUNA项目第五次研讨会，该研讨会汇集了来自16个欧洲国家27个组织的40名参与者，涵盖研究、咨询服务、农民组织、政策制定者及农食价值链参与者。参与者分为三个小组，分别对应项目的种植系统——大田作物、蔬菜作物和多年生作物。针对每种种植系统和转型情景，他们首先将先前识别的知识缺口转化为预期的替代解决方案，包括原型、示范装置和研究产出。随后，他们讨论了早期研讨会中识别的中间行动，按时间线对这些行动进行优先排序，并确定了负责实施的主要行动者及预期受益的利益相关方。这一过程形成了将研究产出与长期转型情景相连接的实施方案路径。\n\n在三个种植系统中，参与者一致认为，减少农药依赖不仅仅需要开发新技术。未来研究应支持综合解决方案，将抗性品种、生物防治、农业生态学方法、基于生物多样性的管理以及用于监测和决策支持的数字技术相结合。然而，这些解决方案的成功实施还取决于研究之外的有利条件，包括有效的咨询服务、农民培训、示范活动、支持性监管框架、财政激励、运转良好的价值链以及良","2026-09-07T00:00:00Z",74,{"impact":119,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":118,"freshness":229,"relevant":20,"comment":252},"欧洲农药减量科研路线图，跨国产学研共识，对国内农业绿色转型有参考价值。",[254,255],{"name":179,"url":246},{"name":179,"url":256},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22643576",[258,27,259,260],"农药减量","欧洲农业","科研路线图",{"code":262,"slug":263,"name":264,"path":265,"parent_code":266},"F4","crop-protection","农药与绿色防控","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Fcrop-protection","F",[268],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":270},{"candidates":271,"agricultural_evidence":45},[272,279,284,291],{"code":262,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":273,"abstract":274,"tags":278},[],[275,276,277],"农药","生物防治","pesticide",[258],{"code":31,"score":280,"supported":45,"title":281,"abstract":282,"tags":283},9,[],[139,48,32],[],{"code":285,"score":107,"supported":45,"title":286,"abstract":287,"tags":290},"B1",[],[288,289],"蔬菜","vegetable",[],{"code":292,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":293,"abstract":294,"tags":296},"I2",[],[295],"decision support",[],[298,299],"科研路线图 农业转型 农药减量 欧洲农业","科研路线图 农业转型","科研路线图农业转型农药减量欧洲农业-1906","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22643575",{"doi":301,"openalex_id":303,"authors":304,"venue":179,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":246,"card":315,"direction":240,"ingested_from":104},"W7211907573",[305,308,310,313],{"name":306,"orcid":307},"Mireille Matt","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2791-4262",{"name":309,"orcid":9},"Renée Van Dis",{"name":311,"orcid":312},"Olivier Mora","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4155-1955",{"name":314,"orcid":9},"Océane Espin",{"tldr":316,"method":317,"finding":318,"direction":102,"opportunity":319},"构建减少欧洲农药使用的实施路径，连接研究创新与未来情景。","基于研讨会，多利益相关者参与，按作物系统分组讨论。","减少农药依赖需综合解决方案，且依赖咨询、培训、政策等支持条件。","可研究如何整合技术与非技术因素，设计跨学科政策支持体系，促进农药减量路径落地。","2026-09-08T23:30:24.443425Z",{"id":322,"title":323,"url":324,"summary":325,"summary_zh":326,"content":9,"source_name":327,"source_url":324,"published_at":328,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":329,"score_detail":330,"sources":334,"tags":336,"primary_topic":342,"secondary_topics":347,"classification":349,"search_phrases":371,"slug":374,"view_count":97,"doi":375,"paper":376,"created_at":396},5392,"Wetland Loss Associated with Hydro-Agricultural Development in North African Floodplains: Insights from a Historical Cartographic Analysis of the Gharb Plain (Morocco)","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3390\u002Fd18100642","Mediterranean floodplain wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural intensification and hydrological modifications. In North Africa, most of these wetlands have been converted to agricultural lands using an extensive ‘drainage–irrigation’ process that has irreversibly degraded them. This study documents this loss through the illustrative example of the Gharb Plain in the northwest of Morocco. The agricultural development process of this plain, initiated in 1927 and only recently completed, is documented by both historical maps and remote sensing data, which we combined to reconstruct the simultaneous wetland decline and agriculture extension. The results reveal a dramatic decline in marshland ecosystems, covering about 88% of the original marshlands in less than one cycle. Several wetlands, including large ones, have entirely disappeared, particularly within the Sebou and Baht river floodplains. To ensure their human occupation, the drainage process and river canalization have been supported by a large program of dam construction upstream of the Gharb Plain. The wetland loss estimate highlights the substantial ecological costs of agricultural intensification and underscores the need for integrated management strategies balancing food production and patrimony conservation. Future research should focus on wetland restoration, ecosystem service assessment, and climate-resilient water management in Mediterranean floodplains.","地中海洪泛平原湿地是最具生产力的生态系统之一，却日益受到农业集约化与水文改造的威胁。在北非，大多数此类湿地已通过大规模的“排水—灌溉”过程被转变为农业用地，并因此遭到不可逆的退化。本研究以摩洛哥西北部加尔卜平原（Gharb Plain）为例，记录了这一丧失过程。该平原的农业开发进程始于1927年，直至近期才告完成，我们结合历史地图与遥感数据，重建了湿地衰退与农业扩张同步发生的过程。结果表明，沼泽生态系统急剧减少，在不到一个周期内约88%的原生沼泽地消失。包括大型湿地在内的多处湿地已完全消失，尤其是在塞布河（Sebou）与巴赫特河（Baht）洪泛平原内。为保障人类占用，排水过程与河流渠化得到了加尔卜平原上游大规模水坝建设计划的支持。湿地丧失的估算凸显了农业集约化所带来的巨大生态代价，并强调需要制定兼顾粮食生产与遗产保护的综合管理策略。未来研究应聚焦于湿地恢复、生态系统服务评估以及地中海洪泛平原的气候韧性水资源管理。","Diversity","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":331,"substance":332,"depth":17,"authority":184,"freshness":120,"relevant":20,"comment":333},16,21,"该研究结合历史地图与遥感数据，量化了北非洪泛平原湿地因农业开发而丧失的情况，方法扎实、结论明确，对农业生态与土地管理有参考价值，但属区域性案例研究，公共影响有限。",[335],{"name":327,"url":324},[337,338,339,340,341],"生态修复","遥感监测","灌溉农业","土地利用变化","湿地保护",{"code":343,"slug":344,"name":345,"path":346,"parent_code":35},"H3","irrigation","水资源与灌溉","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Firrigation",[348],{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":350},{"candidates":351,"agricultural_evidence":45},[352,358,364],{"code":343,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":353,"abstract":354,"tags":357},[],[355,356,344],"灌溉","水资源",[339],{"code":31,"score":280,"supported":45,"title":359,"abstract":360,"tags":363},[],[361,362],"生态系统服务","ecosystem service",[340,341,337],{"code":365,"score":143,"supported":45,"title":366,"abstract":367,"tags":370},"I3",[],[368,369],"遥感","remote sensing",[338],[372,373],"Gharb平原 湿地 遥感","摩洛哥 湿地 灌溉","Gharb平原湿地遥感-5392","10.3390\u002Fd18100642",{"doi":375,"openalex_id":377,"authors":378,"venue":327,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":324,"card":390,"direction":394,"ingested_from":104},"W7222966485",[379,382,384,387],{"name":380,"orcid":381},"Mohamed Dakki","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8042-3972",{"name":383,"orcid":9},"Said El Falah",{"name":385,"orcid":386},"Ibrahim Makrane","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0002-9201-206X",{"name":388,"orcid":389},"Ismail Mansouri","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3679-6050",{"tldr":391,"method":392,"finding":393,"direction":394,"opportunity":395},"用历史地图与遥感重建摩洛哥Gharb平原1927年以来的湿地丧失与农业扩张过程。","历史地图与遥感数据结合，重建湿地退缩与农田扩张的时空过程。","不到一个开发周期内约88%的原生沼泽消失，大型湿地完全丧失。","农业遥感与作物表型","可延伸至地中海洪泛平原湿地恢复优先区识别与生态系统服务权衡研究。","2026-10-20T23:30:19.135602Z",{"id":398,"title":399,"url":400,"summary":401,"summary_zh":402,"content":9,"source_name":403,"source_url":400,"published_at":404,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":405,"score_detail":406,"sources":408,"tags":410,"primary_topic":415,"secondary_topics":416,"classification":422,"search_phrases":440,"slug":443,"view_count":20,"doi":444,"paper":445,"created_at":467},5163,"Ecological indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem responses to climate change in agroecology and nature-based solutions: a scoping review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685","Climate change reshapes biodiversity patterns and ecosystem processes across scales. However, ecological indicators used to track these changes remain uneven in structure and application. This study maps and synthesizes indicators applied in agroecology and nature-based solutions (NbS) for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem responses under climate change. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering literature from 2003 to 2026. From a final dataset of 89 sources, data were extracted through a structured coding framework and synthesized using an Indicator–Scale–Response matrix and an Indicator Application Index. Findings show shared reliance on indicators such as species diversity, ecosystem productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services, and resilience. Differences emerge in how these indicators are applied. Agroecology prioritizes process-based and field-level measurements grounded in local ecological interactions, while NbS emphasizes standardized and scalable metrics linked to monitoring and reporting systems. Cross-scale integration remains uneven, particularly in connecting species-level responses with ecosystem and landscape indicators. Remote sensing and Essential Biodiversity Variables provide emerging pathways for linking scales, though field integration remains partial. Results point to fragmented indicator systems that limit coherent ecological assessment across management contexts. Strengthening alignment between field observations and scalable monitoring approaches could improve comparability and usability of ecological indicators for climate adaptation and ecosystem management in agricultural landscapes.","气候变化重塑了跨尺度的生物多样性模式与生态系统过程。然而，用于追踪这些变化的生态指标在结构和应用上仍不均衡。本研究梳理并综合了农业生态学与基于自然的解决方案（NbS）中用于评估气候变化下生物多样性与生态系统响应的指标。采用PRISMA-ScR指南开展范围综述，检索Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar，覆盖2003年至2026年的文献。从最终89篇文献构成的数据集中，通过结构化编码框架提取数据，并运用“指标—尺度—响应”矩阵和指标应用指数进行综合。研究结果表明，各领域共同依赖物种多样性、生态系统生产力、碳动态、生态系统服务和恢复力等指标，但在指标应用方式上存在差异。农业生态学侧重于基于过程和田块尺度的测量，根植于地方生态相互作用；而NbS强调与监测和报告体系相关联的标准化、可扩展的度量指标。跨尺度整合仍不均衡，尤其是在将物种层面响应与生态系统及景观指标相衔接方面。遥感与基本生物多样性变量（Essential Biodiversity Variables）为连接尺度提供了新兴路径，但野外观测的整合仍不充分。研究结果揭示出指标体系的碎片化，限制了跨管理情境下一致的生态评估。加强野外观测与可扩展监测方法之间的衔接，有望提升生态指标在农业景观气候适应与生态系统管理中的可比性和可用性。","Ecological Indicators","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z",64,{"impact":120,"substance":17,"depth":331,"authority":184,"freshness":280,"relevant":20,"comment":407},"该综述系统梳理了农业生态学与NbS中生物多样性及生态系统响应的指标，方法规范、结论有参考价值，但属学术综述，产业与政策影响有限，适合作为专业资讯而非每日精选头条。",[409],{"name":403,"url":400},[411,139,412,413,414],"气候变化","农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案","生态指标",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[417],{"code":418,"slug":419,"name":420,"path":421,"parent_code":35},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":423},{"candidates":424,"agricultural_evidence":45},[425,430,436],{"code":31,"score":426,"supported":45,"title":427,"abstract":428,"tags":429},27,[32,137],[139,48,361,32,137],[412,139],{"code":418,"score":17,"supported":45,"title":431,"abstract":433,"tags":435},[432],"climate change",[411,434,432],"气候适应",[411],{"code":365,"score":107,"supported":45,"title":437,"abstract":438,"tags":439},[],[368,369],[],[441,442],"基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学 生物多样性 气候变化","基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案农业生态学生物多样性气候变化-5163","10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685",{"doi":444,"openalex_id":446,"authors":447,"venue":403,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":400,"card":462,"direction":394,"ingested_from":104},"W7222588017",[448,451,454,457,459],{"name":449,"orcid":450},"Eliakira Kisetu Nassary","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7327-4366",{"name":452,"orcid":453},"Mawazo Jamson Shitindi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5579-902X",{"name":455,"orcid":456},"Aneth Japhet Magubika","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8910-1953",{"name":458,"orcid":9},"Esta Alfred Mhagama",{"name":460,"orcid":461},"Newton Lwiyiso Kilasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4721-7691",{"tldr":463,"method":464,"finding":465,"direction":102,"opportunity":466},"综述农业生态与NbS中生物多样性和生态系统气候响应指标的应用差异。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，检索2003-2026年89篇文献，构建指标-尺度","两类领域指标依赖相似但应用分化，跨尺度整合不足，指标系统碎片化。","可研究田间观测与遥感EBV衔接的跨尺度指标框架，提升农业景观气候适应评估可比性。","2026-10-17T23:30:28.181936Z",{"id":469,"title":470,"url":471,"summary":472,"summary_zh":473,"content":9,"source_name":474,"source_url":471,"published_at":475,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":116,"score_detail":476,"sources":478,"tags":480,"primary_topic":486,"secondary_topics":487,"classification":489,"search_phrases":504,"slug":507,"view_count":97,"doi":508,"paper":509,"created_at":529},5101,"Advances in Cerrado and tropical grassland plant biology – diversity, functioning, resilience and conservation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331","Abstract Background Tropical grasslands and savannas are ancient, highly diverse ecosystems that support important ecological processes, ecosystem services and human livelihoods, yet they are increasingly threatened by agricultural expansion, altered fire regimes, invasive species and climate change. The Cerrado, the largest savanna-dominated region in the Neotropics, exemplifies both the exceptional biological diversity and vulnerability of tropical open ecosystems. Despite major advances in plant ecology and evolution, important gaps remain in understanding how plants and plant communities respond to environmental change and disturbance. Scope We review recent advances in plant biology in the Cerrado and other tropical grasslands, covering their evolution, vegetation patterns, plant–animal interactions, functional ecology, responses to fire and environmental change, and restoration and conservation. We consider processes from plant traits and physiological responses to community and ecosystem dynamics, examining how environmental and biotic factors shape the diversity, functioning and resilience of tropical grassy ecosystems. Conclusions Recent advances reinforce the value of tropical grasslands as model systems for advancing fundamental plant science while providing knowledge relevant to their conservation and restoration. Future research should better integrate -omics, functional and evolutionary approaches with long-term monitoring, remote sensing and predictive modelling to understand plant responses to climate change, land-use intensification and changing disturbance regimes. Plant research can also contribute to ecosystem restoration, sustainable land management and climate adaptation. Greater recognition of native plant diversity as a resource for sustainable bioeconomies and local livelihoods can further connect biodiversity conservation with societal needs.","摘要 背景 热带草原和稀树草原是古老且高度多样的生态系统，支撑着重要的生态过程、生态系统服务与人类生计，然而它们正日益受到农业扩张、火 regime 改变、入侵物种和气候变化的威胁。塞拉多（Cerrado）是新热带地区最大的以稀树草原为主的区域，集中体现了热带开放生态系统卓越的生物多样性与脆弱性。尽管植物生态学和进化研究已取得重大进展，但在理解植物及植物群落如何响应环境变化和干扰方面仍存在重要空白。 范围 我们综述了塞拉多及其他热带草原植物生物学的最新进展，涵盖其进化、植被格局、植物–动物相互作用、功能生态学、对火和环境变化的响应，以及恢复与保护。我们考察了从植物性状和生理响应到群落和生态系统动态的过程，审视环境和生物因素如何塑造热带草类生态系统的多样性、功能和恢复力。 结论 最新进展强化了热带草原作为推进基础植物科学模型系统的价值，同时提供了与其保护和恢复相关的知识。未来研究应更好地整合组学、功能和进化方法，与长期监测、遥感和预测建模相结合，以理解植物对气候变化、土地利用集约化和干扰 regime 变化的响应。植物研究还可为生态系统恢复、可持续土地管理和气候适应作出贡献。进一步认识本土植物多样性作为可持续生物经济和当地生计资源的价值，可将生物多样性保护与社会需求更紧密地联系起来。","Annals of Botany","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",{"impact":118,"substance":119,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":120,"relevant":20,"comment":477},"核心期刊综述，系统梳理热带草原植物多样性、功能与保护研究进展，学术价值高但与国内农业信息化直接关联有限。",[479],{"name":474,"url":471},[481,482,483,484,485],"生态保护","热带草原","稀树草原","植物多样性","退化草地恢复",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[488],{"code":418,"slug":419,"name":420,"path":421,"parent_code":35},{"status":38,"locked":14,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":490},{"candidates":491,"agricultural_evidence":45},[492,496,500],{"code":31,"score":13,"supported":45,"title":493,"abstract":494,"tags":495},[],[139,361,32],[481],{"code":418,"score":280,"supported":45,"title":497,"abstract":498,"tags":499},[],[411,434,432],[],{"code":365,"score":107,"supported":45,"title":501,"abstract":502,"tags":503},[],[368,369],[],[505,506],"Cerrado 稀树草原 植物生物学","热带草原 植物多样性 保护","Cerrado稀树草原植物生物学-5101","10.1093\u002Faob\u002Fmcag331",{"doi":508,"openalex_id":510,"authors":511,"venue":474,"cited_by_count":97,"oa_url":9,"card":524,"direction":394,"ingested_from":104},"W7222330485",[512,515,518,521],{"name":513,"orcid":514},"Robert G. Miller","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5798-4552",{"name":516,"orcid":517},"Augusto César Franco","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0869-5989",{"name":519,"orcid":520},"Cássia Beatriz Rodrigues Munhoz","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7990-6715",{"name":522,"orcid":523},"Marcelo Fragomeni Simon","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5732-1716",{"tldr":525,"method":526,"finding":527,"direction":394,"opportunity":528},"综述塞拉多及热带草原植物生物学进展，涵盖多样性、功能、恢复力与保护。","文献综述，整合组学、功能与进化方法及长期监测、遥感、预测模型。","热带草原是基础植物科学模型系统，需整合多手段理解植物对环境变化的响应。","将遥感与预测模型用于热带草原植物功能性状监测，填补长期动态与恢复力评估空白。","2026-10-16T23:30:31.368451Z"]