[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3142":3,"related-3142":112},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":31,"secondary_topics":37,"classification":44,"search_phrases":84,"slug":87,"view_count":79,"doi":88,"paper":89,"created_at":111},3142,"Communication channels for promoting regenerative agricultural practices among maize farmers: preferences and predictors in Ghana’s transitional belt","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960","Agricultural extension, knowledge exchange, behavioural change, and smallholder innovation are fundamental to accelerating sustainable agricultural transformation and strengthening climate-resilient food systems in Africa. Effective knowledge exchange enables farmers to adopt environmentally sustainable practices that improve soil health, enhance productivity, and contribute to food and nutrition security. However, limited evidence exists on how farmers’ communication preferences influence the adoption of regenerative agricultural practices (RAPs). This study examined determinants of maize farmers’ preferred communication channels for receiving RAP information in Ghana’s transitional belt. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 maize farmers selected through a multistage sampling procedure. Data were collected using a structured interview schedule administered to the selected respondents. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multinomial logistic regression. Mass communication emerged as the most preferred channel (38.7%), followed by individual (37.1%) and group communication (24.2%). Despite being the least preferred, group communication was associated with significantly higher adoption of RAPs than mass and individual channels. Communication preferences were significantly influenced by education, sex, farming experience, land ownership, market incentives, location, and farm fragmentation. The findings demonstrate that communication effectiveness depends not only on information access but also on opportunities for interaction, peer learning, and contextualised advisory support. The study recommends integrating mass communication with participatory group-based and targeted interpersonal extension approaches to enhance RAPs adoption. This supports SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action and SDG 15 [Life on Land]). By linking communication preferences with regenerative agriculture adoption, this study extends agricultural communication theory and provides evidence for designing farmer-centred extension systems that strengthen resilient agricultural and food systems across sub-Saharan Africa.","农业推广、知识交流、行为改变和小农创新是加速非洲可持续农业转型和增强气候韧性粮食系统的根本所在。有效的知识交流使农民能够采用环境可持续的做法，从而改善土壤健康、提高生产力并促进粮食和营养安全。然而，关于农民的沟通偏好如何影响再生农业实践（RAPs）采纳的证据仍然有限。本研究考察了加纳过渡带玉米农民获取再生农业实践信息时首选沟通渠道的决定因素。研究采用多阶段抽样程序选取了385名玉米农民进行横断面调查，使用结构化访谈问卷对选定受访者进行数据收集，并运用描述性统计、单因素方差分析、卡方检验和多项逻辑回归进行数据分析。大众传播是最受青睐的渠道（38.7%），其次是个体传播（37.1%）和群体传播（24.2%）。尽管群体传播最不受青睐，但其与再生农业实践采纳率显著高于大众传播和个体传播相关。沟通偏好受到教育程度、性别、务农经验、土地所有权、市场激励、地理位置和地块分散程度的显著影响。研究结果表明，沟通效果不仅取决于信息获取，还取决于互动机会、同伴学习和情境化咨询服务。研究建议将大众传播与参与式群体方法和有针对性的面对面推广方法相结合，以提高再生农业实践的采纳率。这有助于实现可持续发展目标2（零饥饿）、目标12（负责任消费和生产）、目标13（气候行动）和目标15（陆地生物）。通过将沟通偏好与再生农业采纳相联系，本研究拓展了农业传播理论，并为设计以农民为中心的推广体系提供了依据，以增强撒哈拉以南非洲地区具有韧性的农业和粮食系统。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,73,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":21,"comment":22},12,21,17,13,1,"基于385户加纳玉米农户调查，揭示沟通渠道偏好与再生农业采纳关系，对非洲小农推广体系有实证参考价值，但地域性强、国内关联度有限。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"加纳","农业推广","玉米种植","再生农业","农户沟通",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},"A3","maize","玉米","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fmaize","A",[38],{"code":39,"slug":40,"name":41,"path":42,"parent_code":43},"H8","sustainable-agriculture","可持续与保护性农业","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsustainable-agriculture","H",{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":48},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":49,"agricultural_evidence":52},[50,56,62,69,77],{"code":32,"score":51,"supported":52,"title":53,"abstract":54,"tags":55},15,true,[33],[34,33],[28],{"code":39,"score":13,"supported":52,"title":57,"abstract":58,"tags":61},[],[59,29,60],"可持续农业","regenerative agriculture",[29],{"code":63,"score":64,"supported":52,"title":65,"abstract":66,"tags":68},"G1",7,[],[27,67],"agricultural extension",[27],{"code":70,"score":71,"supported":52,"title":72,"abstract":73,"tags":76},"H2",6,[],[74,75],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":78,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":80,"abstract":81,"tags":83},"G2",3,[],[82],"smallholder",[],[85,86],"加纳 玉米 农户 沟通渠道","再生农业 推广 加纳","加纳玉米农户沟通渠道-3142","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1961960",{"doi":88,"openalex_id":90,"authors":91,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":103,"oa_url":6,"card":104,"direction":108,"ingested_from":110},"W7213983148",[92,94,97,100],{"name":93,"orcid":9},"Fred Ankuyi",{"name":95,"orcid":96},"Ernest Laryea Okorley","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1354-7446",{"name":98,"orcid":99},"Fatimah Von Abubakari","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5485-4085",{"name":101,"orcid":102},"Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1657-1409",0,{"tldr":105,"method":106,"finding":107,"direction":108,"opportunity":109},"研究加纳玉米农获取再生农业信息的渠道偏好及其对采纳的影响。","对385户玉米农问卷调查，用多项逻辑回归等分析。","大众传播最受偏好，但群体传播渠道对应更高的再生农业实践采纳率。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索数字工具与群体互动结合的混合推广模式，提升小农再生农业采纳。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:07.910603Z",{"total":71,"page":21,"page_size":71,"items":113},[114,178,278,341,397,454],{"id":115,"title":116,"url":117,"summary":118,"summary_zh":9,"content":119,"source_name":120,"source_url":9,"published_at":121,"category":122,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":123,"score_detail":124,"sources":129,"tags":131,"primary_topic":136,"secondary_topics":137,"classification":138,"search_phrases":173,"slug":176,"view_count":103,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":177},4633,"四川南部县夏玉米吨粮田示范测产亩产625.6公斤 旱年稳产增收","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.nanchong.gov.cn\u002Fnyncj\u002Fxwdt\u002Fxsqdt\u002F202610\u002Ft20261010_2365109.html","10月8日,省作物学会专家组对南部县双佛镇夏玉米高产示范片开展测产验收,选用宜单2061、创世90等夏播玉米品种,集成缩株增密、精量机播、绿色防控、化控防倒、适期机收为核心的玉米四良融合绿色高效种植模式。百千万三级示范片平均亩产分别达582.8公斤、554.5公斤、516.3公斤,新田坝村600亩高产示范片亩产达625.6公斤,在今年7月异常高温情况下增产增收效果显著,为丘陵旱作区大面积单产提升提供可复制可推广模式。","示范片聚焦旱作区土壤培肥、产量与效益协同提升，集成“缩株增密、精量机播、绿色防控、化控防倒、适期机收”为核心的玉米“四良融合”绿色高效种植模式，实现从种到收全程机械化、标准化。专家组认为，示范片选择的玉米品种优良，集成应用的种植模式先进适用，在高温干旱影响下，仍实现万亩示范区平均亩产500公斤以上、核心示范片亩产625.6公斤，增产增收效果显著，建议进一步推广应用。","南充市农业农村局 2026-10-10","2026-10-10T00:00:00Z","报道",63,{"impact":125,"substance":126,"depth":20,"authority":127,"freshness":127,"relevant":21,"comment":128},14,18,9,"地市级测产报道，数据具体、模式可复制，对旱作区玉米稳产有参考价值，但影响层级限于区域。",[130],{"name":120,"url":117},[132,133,28,134,135],"全程机械化","旱作农业","良种良法","吨粮田",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":139},{"candidates":140,"agricultural_evidence":52},[141,145,152,158,163,168],{"code":32,"score":17,"supported":52,"title":142,"abstract":143,"tags":144},[34],[34],[28],{"code":146,"score":147,"supported":52,"title":148,"abstract":149,"tags":151},"A8",4,[],[150],"单产提升",[135],{"code":153,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":154,"abstract":155,"tags":157},"F4",[],[156],"绿色防控",[],{"code":159,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":160,"abstract":161,"tags":162},"F1",[],[],[134],{"code":164,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":165,"abstract":166,"tags":167},"F5",[],[],[132],{"code":169,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":170,"abstract":171,"tags":172},"H3",[],[],[133],[174,175],"南部县 夏玉米 吨粮田","玉米 四良融合 绿色高效种植","南部县夏玉米吨粮田-4633","2026-10-11T00:09:42.100302Z",{"id":179,"title":180,"url":181,"summary":182,"summary_zh":183,"content":9,"source_name":184,"source_url":181,"published_at":185,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":186,"score_detail":187,"sources":190,"tags":192,"primary_topic":197,"secondary_topics":198,"classification":204,"search_phrases":259,"slug":262,"view_count":21,"doi":263,"paper":264,"created_at":277},4528,"Integrating indigenous knowledge systems into regenerative agriculture for sustainable crop production in southern Africa","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs43621-026-04926-8","Abstract Agricultural production in Southern Africa is increasingly constrained by climate variability, declining soil fertility, water scarcity, biodiversity loss, and rising pest pressures, particularly within rain-fed smallholder farming systems. Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS), developed through generations of interaction between communities and local agroecosystems, offer context-specific approaches that align closely with the principles of regenerative agriculture. This review synthesizes evidence from 37 publications examining the contribution of IKS to sustainable crop production across Southern Africa. Particular attention is given to soil health, soil biological activity, water-use efficiency, ecological pest regulation, crop productivity, and climate resilience. The synthesis demonstrates that indigenous regenerative practices, including organic soil amendments, residue retention, crop diversification, intercropping, agroforestry, water harvesting, and botanical pest management, improve soil organic carbon, enhance microbial activity, increase water retention, and stabilize yields under climatic stress. Evidence further indicates that indigenous pest management strategies frequently maintain pest populations below economic injury thresholds, thereby reducing dependence on synthetic pesticides while supporting ecosystem services. The review highlights the convergence between IKS, agroecology, integrated pest management, conservation agriculture, and regenerative agriculture, and proposes pathways for integrating indigenous ecological indicators into decision-support systems, crop models, and precision agriculture technologies. Despite growing recognition of indigenous knowledge within sustainability and climate adaptation agendas, significant gaps remain in quantitative validation, longitudinal assessment, and integration into formal agricultural research and policy frameworks. The findings demonstrate that Indigenous Knowledge Systems constitute a scientifically credible and economically viable foundation for regenerative agriculture and contribute directly to Sustainable Development Goals 2 (Zero Hunger), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), 13 (Climate Action), and 15 (Life on Land). Strengthening the integration of indigenous and scientific knowledge systems will be essential for building resilient, productive, and sustainable agricultural systems across Southern Africa and the broader Global South.","摘要 南部非洲的农业生产日益受到气候变异性、土壤肥力下降、水资源短缺、生物多样性丧失和病虫害压力上升的制约，这在雨养小农耕作系统中尤为突出。本土知识体系（Indigenous Knowledge Systems, IKS）通过社区与地方农业生态系统数代互动而发展形成，提供了与再生农业原则高度契合的情境化方法。本综述综合了37篇文献的证据，考察了IKS在南部非洲可持续作物生产中的贡献。研究特别关注土壤健康、土壤生物活性、水分利用效率、生态病虫害调控、作物生产力及气候韧性。综合结果表明，本土再生实践——包括有机土壤改良、残茬保留、作物多样化、间作、农林业、集水和植物源病虫害管理——能够提高土壤有机碳、增强微生物活性、增加持水量并在气候胁迫下稳定产量。证据进一步表明，本土病虫害管理策略常能将病虫害种群维持在经济危害阈值以下，从而减少对合成农药的依赖，同时支持生态系统服务。本综述强调了IKS与农业生态学、病虫害综合治理、保护性农业和再生农业之间的趋同性，并提出了将本土生态指标纳入决策支持系统、作物模型和精准农业技术的路径。尽管本土知识在可持续发展和气候适应议程中日益受到认可，但在定量验证、长期评估以及纳入正式农业研究和政策框架方面仍存在显著空白。研究结果表明，本土知识体系构成了再生农业的科学可信且经济可行的基础，并直接有助于实现可持续发展目标2（零饥饿）、12（负责任消费和生产）、13（气候行动）和15（陆地生物）。加强本土知识与科学知识体系的整合，对于在南部非洲及更广泛的全球南方构建韧性、高产和可持续的农业系统至关重要。","Discover Sustainability","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":51,"substance":18,"depth":126,"authority":20,"freshness":188,"relevant":21,"comment":189},8,"综述整合37篇文献，论证土著知识对再生农业与气候韧性的科学价值，具区域政策参考意义。",[191],{"name":184,"url":181},[193,194,195,29,196],"小农户","气候韧性","土壤健康","土著知识",{"code":39,"slug":40,"name":41,"path":42,"parent_code":43},[199],{"code":200,"slug":201,"name":202,"path":203,"parent_code":43},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity",{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":205},{"candidates":206,"agricultural_evidence":52},[207,212,220,224,231,238,245,249,254],{"code":39,"score":126,"supported":52,"title":208,"abstract":209,"tags":211},[60],[29,210,60],"conservation agriculture",[29],{"code":200,"score":127,"supported":52,"title":213,"abstract":214,"tags":219},[],[215,216,217,201,218],"生物多样性","农业生态","生态系统服务","agroecology",[],{"code":70,"score":64,"supported":52,"title":221,"abstract":222,"tags":223},[],[74,75],[195],{"code":225,"score":64,"supported":52,"title":226,"abstract":227,"tags":230},"H7",[],[228,229],"气候适应","climate resilience",[194],{"code":232,"score":71,"supported":52,"title":233,"abstract":234,"tags":237},"A7",[],[235,236],"间作","intercropping",[],{"code":239,"score":71,"supported":52,"title":240,"abstract":241,"tags":244},"I1",[],[242,243],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[],{"code":78,"score":147,"supported":52,"title":246,"abstract":247,"tags":248},[],[82],[193],{"code":153,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":250,"abstract":251,"tags":253},[],[252],"农药",[],{"code":169,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":255,"abstract":256,"tags":258},[],[257],"水资源",[],[260,261],"南部非洲 再生农业 土著知识","土著知识 土壤健康 小农户","南部非洲再生农业土著知识-4528","10.1007\u002Fs43621-026-04926-8",{"doi":263,"openalex_id":265,"authors":266,"venue":184,"cited_by_count":103,"oa_url":181,"card":270,"direction":276,"ingested_from":110},"W7220943031",[267],{"name":268,"orcid":269},"Albert Thembinkosi Modi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6887-1721",{"tldr":271,"method":272,"finding":273,"direction":274,"opportunity":275},"综述37篇文献，论证南部非洲本土知识可支撑再生农业与可持续作物生产。","系统综述37篇文献，聚焦土壤、水分、病虫害与气候韧性。","本土再生实践能提升土壤碳、微生物活性与水分保持，稳定产量并减少农药依赖。","农业绿色发展与碳","可将本土生态指标量化并嵌入作物模型与精准农业决策系统，填补长期验证空白。","农业人工智能与决策模型","2026-10-09T23:30:52.261674Z",{"id":279,"title":280,"url":281,"summary":282,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":283,"source_url":9,"published_at":284,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":285,"score_detail":286,"sources":289,"tags":291,"primary_topic":295,"secondary_topics":296,"classification":301,"search_phrases":328,"slug":331,"view_count":79,"doi":9,"paper":332,"created_at":340},3243,"Integrating Climate Resilience and Digital Traceability in Regenerative Agri-Food Systems: A Scenario-Based Framework for Verifiable Sustainability Claims（再生农业食品系统整合气候韧性与数字溯源：可验证可持续性声明的情景框架）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2077-0472\u002F16\u002F18\u002F2024","MDPI Agriculture 16(18) 2024 发表研究：面对再生农业食品系统的可持续性声明常缺乏可验证、系统性证据的问题，构建整合情景分析、SWOT评估和案例研究的三方法框架。三种前瞻性情景——乐观、常规、悲观——基于现有气候韧性和政策文献构建；SWOT分析综合区块链、物联网和AI赋能的溯源机制影响因素；案例研究以先前记录的再生农业食品计划为基础，分析气候韧性叙事、数字验证工具和消费者信任线索的交互作用。结果表明，再生声明常与可验证数据流脱节，数字溯源采用面临结构性、成本相关障碍，消费者信任更依赖于情感和本土化线索而非正式认证；该框架为政策制定者、认证机构和农产品生产者将气候韧性战略与数字可验证可持续性声明相结合提供可复制、低资源方法。（罗马尼亚布加勒斯特国家科学技术大学Politehnica）","MDPI Agriculture","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",70,{"impact":17,"substance":287,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":188,"relevant":21,"comment":288},20,"论文提出情景分析、SWOT与案例研究三方法框架，指出再生农业可持续性声明与可验证数据流脱节，对农业数字化溯源有参考价值，但属学术探讨、产业落地影响有限。",[290],{"name":283,"url":281},[292,293,194,294,29],"农业人工智能","区块链","数字溯源",{"code":39,"slug":40,"name":41,"path":42,"parent_code":43},[297],{"code":225,"slug":298,"name":299,"path":300,"parent_code":43},"climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":302},{"candidates":303,"agricultural_evidence":52},[304,308,312,318,323],{"code":39,"score":17,"supported":52,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":307},[29],[29],[29],{"code":225,"score":127,"supported":52,"title":309,"abstract":310,"tags":311},[229],[],[194],{"code":313,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":314,"abstract":315,"tags":317},"I5",[],[316],"物联网",[],{"code":319,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":320,"abstract":321,"tags":322},"E4",[],[],[294],{"code":324,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":325,"abstract":326,"tags":327},"I2",[],[],[292],[329,330],"布加勒斯特 Politehnica 再生农业","MDPI Agriculture 数字溯源","布加勒斯特Politehnica再生农业-3243",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":333,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":103,"oa_url":9,"card":334,"direction":108,"ingested_from":339},[],{"tldr":335,"method":336,"finding":337,"direction":108,"opportunity":338},"构建情景分析、SWOT与案例研究框架，整合再生农业的气候韧性与数字溯源以验证可持续性声明。","情景分析、SWOT评估与案例研究三方法框架，结合区块链、物联网和AI溯源文献。","再生声明常与可验证数据脱节，数字溯源有成本障碍，消费者信任更依赖情感与本土线索。","可探索低成本数字溯源与本土化信任线索结合的可验证声明机制，尤其在小农户场景。","agent","2026-09-23T00:04:32.924354Z",{"id":342,"title":343,"url":344,"summary":345,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":346,"source_url":9,"published_at":284,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":347,"score_detail":348,"sources":351,"tags":353,"primary_topic":357,"secondary_topics":358,"classification":359,"search_phrases":384,"slug":387,"view_count":388,"doi":9,"paper":389,"created_at":396},3050,"面向再生农业与气候韧性食物系统的可解释数字孪生集成框架","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mdpi.com\u002F2071-1050\u002F18\u002F18\u002F9645","研究提出集成全球农业基础表征模型（GAFRM）、自演化可解释数字孪生（SEDT）、自演化进化基础优化器（SEEFO）与增强型绿色再生农业可持续性指数（GRASI）的统一计算框架，显式将作物微量营养素密度纳入农业决策架构并建模其与覆盖作物、生物炭施用、免耕等再生实践的关系。框架使用多源全球数据集评估全球约60个代表性国家6大洲15个气候带2000-2026年数据，SEDT达到RMSE 3.18\u002FMAE 2.29\u002FR² 0.972\u002FNSE 0.968；SEEFO获得最高Hypervolume 0.956与最低GD 0.028；通过XAI特征归因建立全透明、可解释决策支持环境。","MDPI Sustainability 18(18):9645",80,{"impact":126,"substance":349,"depth":126,"authority":20,"freshness":127,"relevant":21,"comment":350},22,"方法新颖、数据规模大且指标可靠，属农业人工智能与气候智慧农业前沿成果，值得进入每日精选。",[352],{"name":346,"url":344},[354,355,356,194,29],"智慧农业","可解释AI","数字孪生",{"code":39,"slug":40,"name":41,"path":42,"parent_code":43},[],{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":360},{"candidates":361,"agricultural_evidence":52},[362,366,370,376,380],{"code":239,"score":20,"supported":52,"title":363,"abstract":364,"tags":365},[356],[356],[356,354],{"code":39,"score":17,"supported":52,"title":367,"abstract":368,"tags":369},[29],[29],[29],{"code":371,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":372,"abstract":373,"tags":375},"J3",[],[374],"全球农业",[],{"code":225,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":379},[],[],[194],{"code":324,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":381,"abstract":382,"tags":383},[],[],[355],[385,386],"GAFRM 数字孪生 再生农业","GRASI 气候韧性","GAFRM数字孪生再生农业-3050",2,{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":390,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":103,"oa_url":9,"card":391,"direction":276,"ingested_from":339},[],{"tldr":392,"method":393,"finding":394,"direction":276,"opportunity":395},"提出集成数字孪生与进化优化的可解释框架，将微量营养素密度纳入再生农业决策。","全球60国2000-2026多源数据，GAFRM+SEDT+SEEFO+GRAS","SEDT预测精度高（R²0.972），SEEFO优化性能最优，实现透明可解释决策支持。","可探索将微量营养素密度与再生实践耦合的实时数字孪生，并验证跨气候带可迁移性。","2026-09-21T00:04:39.490071Z",{"id":398,"title":399,"url":400,"summary":401,"summary_zh":9,"content":402,"source_name":403,"source_url":9,"published_at":404,"category":122,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":405,"score_detail":406,"sources":408,"tags":410,"primary_topic":415,"secondary_topics":416,"classification":422,"search_phrases":449,"slug":452,"view_count":388,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":453},2590,"襄阳玉米种植技术培训推广会在襄州举行 湖北农科院腾峰授课","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fcontent\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002Fcontent_20213036.html","9月11日襄阳市现代农产品加工政策宣讲暨微讲堂第五场。来自湖北省农科院的腾峰以《科学选种，稳增效益》为题强调了选种的重要性。","汉江网讯（记者罗安 刘梦灵 通讯员周谦）9月11日，由中共襄阳市委社会工作部、襄阳市科学技术局主办的襄阳市现代农产品加工政策宣讲暨“微讲堂”第五场——玉米种植技术培训推广会在襄州区举行。各县（市、区）科经局业务分管同志、玉米产业科技特派员、规模化农业经营主体、农民专业合作社骨干及基层农业技术推广人员百余人参加了本次培训推广会。\n\n![Image 1](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002F08ca3637-dbe1-40f8-8db6-c9fbcca47dc5.png)\n\n培训推广会上，来自湖北省农科院的腾峰以《科学选种，稳增效益》为题强调了选种的重要性，华中农业大学展茗为大家分享了《湖北夏玉米丰产高效策略与关键技术》，襄州区科协主席、高级农艺师许燕子讲授了《玉米病虫害防治技术》，帮助大家分析不同病虫害的防治要点。\n\n![Image 2](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002Ff80cf26b-573a-41fa-8d8a-843fc1b3f6f7.png)\n\n![Image 3](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002F1d856384-5c19-42fc-9768-5b27501b0048.png)\n\n![Image 4](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002F87c63962-6d25-465a-8882-cf8388e8eea2.png)\n\n培训会前，大家还参观了湖北扶轮农业黄淮海国家试验站，详细了解优良玉米品种、水肥一体种植模式；并来到正大种业襄阳核心试验站观摩智能化温室，了解水肥一体化技术、大田玉米高产栽培模式。\n\n![Image 5](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002Fa8049770-c545-4e54-93ce-53817fc02e25.png)\n\n![Image 6](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002Fda92503f-059c-4a94-a535-0f39e13c91b4.png)\n\n![Image 7](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hj.cn\u002Fpic\u002F2026-09\u002F11\u002F71de75b3-f4fe-4ba3-bff3-a1a68ee1e130.png)\n\n下一步，主办方将持续深化“专家链+产业链”协同服务机制，聚焦全市十大重点农业产业链建设，常态化组织开展惠农下乡系列活动，推动先进适用农业技术落地见效，依靠科技创新持续提升粮食综合产能，助力农业增效、农民增收，为全面推进乡村振兴强化科技保障。\n\n编辑：李紫嫣\n\n审核：黄金丽 终审：金成岑","汉江网 2026-09-11","2026-09-11T00:00:00Z",40,{"impact":188,"substance":17,"depth":188,"authority":71,"freshness":71,"relevant":21,"comment":407},"地市级玉米种植技术培训推广会，含选种、丰产高效与病虫害防治等实用内容，并组织试验站观摩，但属常规通稿，影响与增量有限。",[409],{"name":403,"url":400},[411,412,413,28,414],"种业振兴","水肥一体化","农技推广","湖北襄阳",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[417],{"code":63,"slug":418,"name":419,"path":420,"parent_code":421},"extension-transfer","农技推广与成果转化","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Fextension-transfer","G",{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":423},{"candidates":424,"agricultural_evidence":52},[425,429,434,440,444],{"code":32,"score":127,"supported":52,"title":426,"abstract":427,"tags":428},[34],[],[28],{"code":63,"score":127,"supported":52,"title":430,"abstract":432,"tags":433},[431],"技术培训",[],[413],{"code":435,"score":79,"supported":52,"title":436,"abstract":437,"tags":439},"E1",[],[438],"农产品加工",[],{"code":159,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":441,"abstract":442,"tags":443},[],[],[411],{"code":445,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":446,"abstract":447,"tags":448},"F3",[],[],[412],[450,451],"水肥一体化 农技推广 湖北襄阳 玉米种植","水肥一体化 农技推广","水肥一体化农技推广湖北襄阳玉米种植-2590","2026-09-16T00:03:48.995553Z",{"id":455,"title":456,"url":457,"summary":458,"summary_zh":459,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":457,"published_at":460,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":461,"score_detail":462,"sources":465,"tags":467,"primary_topic":472,"secondary_topics":473,"classification":479,"search_phrases":502,"slug":505,"view_count":388,"doi":506,"paper":507,"created_at":529},2128,"The impact of agricultural insurance coverage on farm household income inequality: evidence from corn farmers in Liaoning Province, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1856386","Introduction As climate variability and production uncertainty increasingly threaten agricultural livelihoods, agricultural insurance has become an important tool for climate risk management and farm income stabilization. However, its distributional effects across farm households remain underexplored. Drawing on Sen’s capability approach, this study investigates the impact of agricultural insurance coverage on income inequality among farm households. Methods Using a two-wave panel dataset of 627 corn-growing households in Liaoning Province, China, from 2021 to 2022, we employ a two-way fixed effects model to estimate the effect of agricultural insurance coverage on farm household income inequality. We further test the robustness of the baseline results through a series of checks, including replacing the dependent variable, controlling for village-level fixed effects, adding village-level controls, clustering bootstrap standard errors at the village level and alternative model specifications. Exploratory analysis and heterogeneity analysis are also conducted. Results The empirical results yield four main findings. First, higher agricultural insurance coverage is positively associated with income inequality among farm households, and this pattern remains robust across multiple tests. Second, the observed association with inequality is concentrated in operating income, with no significant corresponding patterns for wage income, property income, or transfer income. Third, exploratory analysis suggests that agricultural insurance coverage is linked to greater land transfer-in primarily for high-income households, a relationship that is consistent with the observed increased income inequality. Fourth, this association is more pronounced among households with greater realized production loss and among those living in areas without income insurance policies. Discussion This study enriches the literature on agricultural insurance by highlighting its unintended distributional consequences. Although agricultural insurance plays an important role in risk management, its potential to widen inequality implies that policy design should not rely on insurance alone. Greater attention to equity requires complementary redistributive instruments, alongside efforts to make insurance more inclusive for disadvantaged farmers.","引言 随着气候变率和生产不确定性日益威胁农业生计，农业保险已成为气候风险管理和稳定农户收入的重要工具。然而，其对不同农户的分配效应仍缺乏充分探讨。本研究基于森的可行能力方法，考察农业保险覆盖对农户收入不平等的影响。方法 使用2021年至2022年中国辽宁省627个玉米种植户的两期面板数据，采用双向固定效应模型估计农业保险覆盖对农户收入不平等的影响。我们进一步通过一系列检验验证基准结果的稳健性，包括替换因变量、控制村级固定效应、加入村级控制变量、在村级聚类自助法标准误以及替代模型设定。同时进行了探索性分析和异质性分析。结果 实证结果得出四个主要发现。第一，较高的农业保险覆盖与农户收入不平等呈正相关，且这一模式在多项检验中保持稳健。第二，观察到的与不平等的关系集中于经营收入，而工资性收入、财产性收入或转移性收入未呈现显著的相应模式。第三，探索性分析表明，农业保险覆盖与高收入农户更多转入土地相关，这一关系与观察到的收入不平等加剧相一致。第四，这种关联在实际生产损失较大的农户以及居住在无收入保险政策地区的农户中更为明显。讨论 本研究通过揭示农业保险的非预期分配后果，丰富了农业保险文献。尽管农业保险在风险管理中发挥重要作用，但其扩大不平等的潜力意味着政策设计不应仅依赖保险。更加关注公平需要 complementary 再分配工具，同时努力使保险对弱势农户更具包容性。","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",77,{"impact":463,"substance":349,"depth":126,"authority":20,"freshness":188,"relevant":21,"comment":464},16,"基于辽宁627户玉米种植户两期面板数据的实证研究，揭示农业保险覆盖扩大反而加剧农户收入不平等，并指出其通过高收入户土地转入的传导机制，对农业保险政策设计具有重要警示价值。",[466],{"name":10,"url":457},[468,469,28,470,471],"农业保险","收入不平等","农户收入","土地流转",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[474],{"code":475,"slug":476,"name":477,"path":478,"parent_code":421},"G3","rural-finance","农村金融与保险","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-finance",{"status":45,"locked":14,"version":46,"method":47,"evidence":480},{"candidates":481,"agricultural_evidence":52},[482,487,492,497],{"code":32,"score":51,"supported":52,"title":483,"abstract":485,"tags":486},[484],"corn",[34,484],[28],{"code":475,"score":51,"supported":52,"title":488,"abstract":490,"tags":491},[489],"agricultural insurance",[468,489],[468],{"code":78,"score":147,"supported":52,"title":493,"abstract":494,"tags":496},[],[495],"land transfer",[471],{"code":498,"score":147,"supported":52,"title":499,"abstract":500,"tags":501},"G6",[],[470],[470],[503,504],"收入不平等 农业保险 农户收入 土地流转","收入不平等 农业保险","收入不平等农业保险农户收入土地流转-2128","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1856386",{"doi":506,"openalex_id":508,"authors":509,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":103,"oa_url":457,"card":524,"direction":108,"ingested_from":110},"W7212115989",[510,513,516,519,521],{"name":511,"orcid":512},"Bo Hu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8527-3750",{"name":514,"orcid":515},"Wenbo Zhang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4672-1420",{"name":517,"orcid":518},"Chunli Wan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6027-4869",{"name":520,"orcid":9},"Naihe Jiang",{"name":522,"orcid":523},"Fengjie Xie","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-0688-3126",{"tldr":525,"method":526,"finding":527,"direction":108,"opportunity":528},"基于辽宁玉米户面板数据，发现农业保险覆盖扩大反而加剧农户收入不平等。","2021-2022年627户两期面板数据，双向固定效应模型及多种稳健性检验。","保险覆盖与收入不平等正相关，主要来自经营收入，高收入户土地转入更多。","可研究保险与数字信贷、补贴等政策组合对农户收入分配公平性的协同调节机制。","2026-09-11T23:30:07.758358Z"]