[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3345":3,"related-3345":94},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":32,"secondary_topics":38,"classification":39,"search_phrases":74,"slug":77,"view_count":78,"doi":79,"paper":80,"created_at":93},3345,"E-commerce digitalization for sustainable agricultural and rural development: models and pathways","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1743839","This study adopts the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework as its core meso-level integrated explanatory framework, embedding digital empowerment theory to guide variable selection and causal logic. Meanwhile, it classifies the core conditional variables into technological capabilities, organizational capabilities, and environmental\u002Fstructural factors, avoiding the stacking of practical dimensions in variable selection. We find that sustainable agricultural and rural development (SARD) outcomes are not driven by single factors but by the synergistic effect of multiple configurations. Analysis identifies three distinct pathways: digital technology and agile response-driven, service and channel optimization, and comprehensive synergy. The most effective pathway synergistically combines high channel integration, high digitalization of service experience, high marketing response agility, and high precision in consumer insight. These pathways enhance agricultural marketing efficiency and advance SARD across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Furthermore, substitution effects exist among some auxiliary factors; for instance, depth of digital technology application and precision of consumer insight can be functionally equivalent in the digital technology and agile response-driven pathway. The core theoretical contribution of this study is breaking through the traditional linear cognition of single-factor driving in the research of digital agriculture and SARD, which is prevalent in both domestic and international academia. By adopting the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method, we identify and theorize three typical configurational driving archetypes of e-commerce-driven SARD, namely Technology-Agile type, Service-Optimized type and Comprehensive Synergy type, reveal the mechanisms of multiple concurrent causality and equifinal paths in the digital empowerment of SARD, supplement the configurational analysis perspective for the digital empowerment theory, and provide micro-practical support for the sustainable transition theory in the context of global digital agriculture and platformization development. We recommend that agricultural enterprises strengthen digital technology, build distinctive product identities based on consumer insights, and enhance service experiences to foster sustainable transitions.","本研究以技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架为核心的中层整合解释框架，嵌入数字赋能理论以指导变量选择与因果逻辑。同时，将核心条件变量归类为技术能力、组织能力和环境\u002F结构因素，避免变量选择中实践维度的堆叠。研究发现，农业农村可持续发展(SARD)成效并非由单一因素驱动，而是多重条件组合的协同效应所致。分析识别出三条差异化路径：数字技术与敏捷响应驱动型、服务与渠道优化型、综合协同型。其中最有效的路径协同组合了高渠道整合度、高服务体验数字化、高营销响应敏捷性和高消费者洞察精准度。这些路径提升了农产品营销效率，并在经济、社会和环境维度上推进了SARD。此外，部分辅助因素之间存在替代效应；例如，在数字技术与敏捷响应驱动型路径中，数字技术应用深度与消费者洞察精准度可在功能上等效。本研究的核心理论贡献在于突破了国内外学术界在数字农业与SARD研究中普遍存在的单因素驱动的传统线性认知。通过采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法，我们识别并理论化了电子商务驱动SARD的三种典型组态驱动原型，即技术-敏捷型、服务-优化型和综合协同型，揭示了数字赋能SARD中多重并发因果与等效路径的机制，为数字赋能理论补充了组态分析视角，并为全球数字农业与平台化发展背景下的可持续转型理论提供了微观实践支撑。我们建议农业企业强化数字技术，基于消费者洞察构建特色产品标识，并提升服务体验以促进可持续转型。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,77,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},16,21,18,13,9,1,"基于TOE框架与fsQCA方法揭示电商驱动农业农村可持续发展的三条组态路径，方法新颖、结论有理论增量，对数字乡村与农村电商实践具参考价值。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"数字农业","农村电商","数字乡村","可持续农业","fsQCA",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},"I1","smart-agriculture","智慧农业总论","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fsmart-agriculture","I",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":48},[45,53,59,64,69],{"code":46,"score":47,"supported":48,"title":49,"abstract":51,"tags":52},"G",11,true,[50],"rural development",[50],[],{"code":33,"score":54,"supported":48,"title":55,"abstract":56,"tags":58},7,[],[27,57],"digital agriculture",[27],{"code":60,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":61,"abstract":62,"tags":63},"E5",[],[],[28],{"code":65,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":66,"abstract":67,"tags":68},"H8",[],[],[30],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":71,"abstract":72,"tags":73},"I6",[],[],[29],[75,76],"农村电商 数字赋能 可持续发展","电商 农业营销 数字化转型","农村电商数字赋能可持续发展-3345",3,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1743839",{"doi":79,"openalex_id":81,"authors":82,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":6,"card":86,"direction":90,"ingested_from":92},"W7214123656",[83],{"name":84,"orcid":9},"Qian Shan",0,{"tldr":87,"method":88,"finding":89,"direction":90,"opportunity":91},"基于TOE框架与fsQCA，识别电商数字化驱动农业农村可持续发展的三条组态路径。","TOE框架、数字赋能理论、fsQCA方法，分析多条件组态。","高渠道整合、高服务体验数字化、高营销响应敏捷与高消费者洞察精准组合最有效，存在替代效应。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探究不同区域或平台情境下组态路径的适用边界，以及替代效应的动态演化机制。","openalex","2026-09-24T23:30:08.046331Z",{"total":95,"page":22,"page_size":95,"items":96},6,[97,152,206,268,319,374],{"id":98,"title":99,"url":100,"summary":101,"summary_zh":102,"content":9,"source_name":103,"source_url":100,"published_at":104,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":105,"score_detail":106,"sources":110,"tags":112,"primary_topic":116,"secondary_topics":117,"classification":118,"search_phrases":134,"slug":137,"view_count":85,"doi":138,"paper":139,"created_at":151},4603,"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN AGRICULTURE: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH-EAST NIGERIA","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23262454","This study examined how public administration shapes the digital transformation of agriculture and what that transformation implies for economic development in South-East Nigeria. Three objectives guided the work: to determine the extent to which public agricultural institutions have deployed digital tools in service delivery, to assess the perceived effect of digital agricultural services on indicators of economic development, and to identify the administrative and infrastructural challenges that constrain digital transformation in the zone. The study was anchored on Digital-Era Governance theory, supported by the Technology Acceptance Model. A descriptive survey design was adopted. A structured questionnaire was administered to a Yamane-determined sample of 356 farmers, extension agents and ministry officials drawn from Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo States, of which 320 copies (89.9%) were valid. Data were analysed with frequencies and simple percentages. Findings showed that institutional deployment of digital tools is partial: an average of only 46.0% of respondents agreed that the listed digital services were available, with mobile-based extension (62.5%) the only clearly established channel. Respondents nevertheless perceived digital services as beneficial, with an average of 65.5% agreeing that they raise output, income, employment and accountability. Constraints were severe, led by poor rural network and electricity supply (87.5%), cost of devices and data (85.0%) and low digital literacy (82.5%). The study concludes that the development dividend of digital agriculture in the South-East depends less on technology than on administrative capacity, funding and intergovernmental coordination. It recommends state-level digital agriculture units, interoperable farmer registries, ring-fenced funding and rural connectivity partnerships","本研究考察了公共行政如何塑造农业的数字化转型，以及这种转型对尼日利亚东南部经济发展意味着什么。研究围绕三个目标展开：确定公共农业机构在服务提供中部署数字工具的程度；评估数字农业服务对经济发展指标的感知影响；识别制约该区域数字化转型的行政与基础设施挑战。研究以数字时代治理理论为锚点，并以技术接受模型为支撑。研究采用描述性调查设计。向由Yamane公式确定的356名农民、推广人员和部委官员发放了结构化问卷，样本来自阿比亚、阿南布拉、埃邦伊、埃努古和伊莫州，其中320份（89.9%）有效。数据采用频数和简单百分比进行分析。研究发现，机构对数字工具的部署是局部的：平均仅有46.0%的受访者同意所列数字服务可用，其中基于移动端的推广（62.5%）是唯一明确建立的渠道。尽管如此，受访者仍认为数字服务有益，平均65.5%的受访者同意其能提高产量、收入、就业和问责制。制约因素严重，主要是农村网络和电力供应差（87.5%）、设备和数据成本（85.0%）以及数字素养低（82.5%）。研究得出结论：东南部数字农业的发展红利与其说取决于技术，不如说取决于行政能力、资金和政府间协调。研究建议设立州级数字农业单位、可互操作的农民登记系统、专项封闭资金以及农村连通性伙伴关系。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-09T00:00:00Z",69,{"impact":107,"substance":108,"depth":17,"authority":107,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":109},12,20,"基于356份问卷的实证研究，揭示尼日利亚东南部农业数字化部署不足与基础设施瓶颈，对发展中国家数字乡村建设有参考价值，但属区域案例、影响层级有限。",[111],{"name":103,"url":100},[27,29,113,114,115],"农业推广","尼日利亚","农村数字化",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":119},{"candidates":120,"agricultural_evidence":48},[121,125,130],{"code":33,"score":54,"supported":48,"title":122,"abstract":123,"tags":124},[],[27,57],[27],{"code":126,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":127,"abstract":128,"tags":129},"G1",[],[],[113],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":131,"abstract":132,"tags":133},[],[],[29],[135,136],"尼日利亚 东南部 数字农业","公共行政 农业数字化转型","尼日利亚东南部数字农业-4603","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23262454",{"doi":138,"openalex_id":140,"authors":141,"venue":103,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":100,"card":146,"direction":90,"ingested_from":92},"W7221175474",[142,144],{"name":143,"orcid":9},"AZIBAGIRI SAMUEL OMEKWE",{"name":145,"orcid":9},"Forcados Ogheneovo Joseph",{"tldr":147,"method":148,"finding":149,"direction":90,"opportunity":150},"研究尼日利亚东南部农业数字化转型中公共管理的作用及其经济发展影响。","基于数字时代治理理论与技术接受模型，对356名农户、推广员和官员问卷调查。","数字工具部署仅46%到位，但65.5%受访者认可其效益；网络电力、成本与数字素养是主要制约。","可延伸研究公共行政能力与数字农业成效的因果机制，以及跨部门协调与资金保障的制度设计。","2026-10-10T23:30:36.232401Z",{"id":153,"title":154,"url":155,"summary":156,"summary_zh":157,"content":9,"source_name":158,"source_url":155,"published_at":159,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":160,"score_detail":161,"sources":165,"tags":167,"primary_topic":171,"secondary_topics":172,"classification":173,"search_phrases":188,"slug":191,"view_count":78,"doi":192,"paper":193,"created_at":205},4061,"Being Granular, Becoming Sustainable:","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.21248\u002Fka-notizen.88.61","This article examines the integration of digitization and environmental concerns in digital agriculture from the perspective of actors in smart farming in Switzerland. Those actors, previously unconnected to farming, promote the use of granular data to achieve more sustainable practices. Considering granularity as a practitioner-made achievement rather than a technical property alone, I draw on interviews and ethnographic observations, and rely on material-semiotic insights from STS (Law, 2008; Mol, 1999; Lien & Law, 2011) to examine how granularity data is brought into existence through heterogeneous practices. I first analyze how the connection between digital agriculture and more sustainable practices is operated as a motto, an aspirational principle that draws from different sources and comparisons. I then show how the production and interpretation of granular data depend on experimental infrastructures, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ongoing human interpretation, all of which contribute to the existence of granularity while enacting specific definitions of sustainability.","本文从瑞士智慧农业行动者的视角，考察数字农业中数字化与环境关切的融合。这些行动者此前与农业并无关联，他们推动利用细粒度数据来实现更可持续的实践。本文将细粒度视为实践者的成就而非单纯的技术属性，基于访谈和民族志观察，并借助STS（科学技术与社会研究）的物质-符号学洞见（Law, 2008; Mol, 1999; Lien & Law, 2011），考察细粒度数据如何通过异质性实践被带入存在。我首先分析数字农业与更可持续实践之间的关联如何作为一种箴言（motto）运作——这是一种从不同来源和比较中汲取的愿景性原则。随后我展示细粒度数据的生产和解读如何依赖于实验性基础设施、跨学科协作以及持续的人类解释活动，所有这些共同促成了细粒度的存在，同时也在 enact（制定\u002F施行）可持续性的特定定义。","Kulturanthropologie Notizen","2026-10-02T00:00:00Z",64,{"impact":162,"substance":19,"depth":163,"authority":20,"freshness":162,"relevant":22,"comment":164},8,17,"从STS视角剖析瑞士智慧农业中数据粒度与可持续性的建构过程，方法新颖、结论可靠，但属学术个案研究，公共影响有限。",[166],{"name":158,"url":155},[27,168,30,169,170],"智慧农业","农业数据","瑞士",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":174},{"candidates":175,"agricultural_evidence":48},[176,180,184],{"code":33,"score":47,"supported":48,"title":177,"abstract":178,"tags":179},[],[168,27,57],[27,168],{"code":65,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":181,"abstract":182,"tags":183},[],[],[30],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":185,"abstract":186,"tags":187},[],[],[169],[189,190],"瑞士 智慧农业 数据粒度","可持续农业 农业数据 数字农业 智慧农业","瑞士智慧农业数据粒度-4061","10.21248\u002Fka-notizen.88.61",{"doi":192,"openalex_id":194,"authors":195,"venue":158,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":155,"card":199,"direction":204,"ingested_from":92},"W7216220972",[196],{"name":197,"orcid":198},"Mylène Tanferri","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1650-8442",{"tldr":200,"method":201,"finding":202,"direction":90,"opportunity":203},"从瑞士智慧农业行动者视角，探讨数字化与可持续性如何通过颗粒化数据实践结合。","访谈与民族志观察，结合STS物质符号学分析。","颗粒化数据是实践成就，依赖实验设施、跨学科协作和持续人为解释，并塑造特定可持续定义。","可研究颗粒化数据实践中不同行动者如何协商可持续性定义，及其对农户采纳的影响。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-10-03T23:30:10.168598Z",{"id":207,"title":208,"url":209,"summary":210,"summary_zh":211,"content":9,"source_name":212,"source_url":209,"published_at":213,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":214,"score_detail":215,"sources":218,"tags":220,"primary_topic":224,"secondary_topics":225,"classification":226,"search_phrases":242,"slug":245,"view_count":22,"doi":246,"paper":247,"created_at":267},2766,"Profiles of Structural Exclusion in the Twin Transition: Ideal Types, Political Disaffection, and Participatory Governance","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.17645\u002Fpag.12501","This article analyses how the simultaneous pursuit of green decarbonisation and digital transformation—the twin transition—generates disproportionate structural burdens on marginalised social groups. Drawing on Max Weber’s ideal‐type methodology (Idealtypus) and Spanish statistical evidence, it develops six prototypical profiles of structural exclusion across key twin‐transition sectors: urban mobility and transport, the platform and gig economy, rural energy and depopulation, digital public infrastructure and smart cities, digital agriculture, and urban renovation. Each profile identifies the mechanisms through which green and digital policies impose unequal costs on vulnerable groups, examining the resulting dynamics of institutional disaffection, potential political radicalisation, and common structural patterns. Comparative analysis identifies four recurring exclusion mechanisms—the upfront cost barrier, the digital literacy gateway, the geographic penalty, and knowledge disqualification—tracing a common pathway from structural exclusion to political disaffection. The article concludes by proposing five governance principles grounded in community work and participatory governance, offering a framework transferable to comparable EU contexts.","本文分析绿色脱碳与数字化转型的同时推进——即“双重转型”——如何对边缘化社会群体造成不成比例的结构性负担。基于马克斯·韦伯的理想类型方法（Idealtypus）与西班牙统计数据，本文在双重转型的关键领域构建了六种结构性排斥的典型画像：城市出行与交通、平台与零工经济、农村能源与人口流失、数字公共基础设施与智慧城市、数字农业以及城市更新。每种画像均识别了绿色与数字政策对弱势群体施加不平等成本的机制，并考察由此产生的制度疏离动态、潜在政治激进化以及共同的结构模式。比较分析识别出四种反复出现的排斥机制——前期成本壁垒、数字素养门槛、地理惩罚与知识 disqualification，并追溯了从结构性排斥到政治疏离的共同路径。文章最后提出五项基于社区工作与参与式治理的治理原则，提供了一个可迁移至可比欧盟情境的框架。","Politics and Governance","2026-09-17T00:00:00Z",78,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":216,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":217},14,"以韦伯理想型方法结合西班牙统计数据，构建双转型中结构性排斥的六类原型，其中数字农业与农村能源人口流失维度对农业信息化与数字乡村治理有直接参考价值，结论与治理原则可迁移至欧盟同类情境。",[219],{"name":212,"url":209},[27,29,221,222,223],"乡村治理","智慧城市","平台经济",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":227},{"candidates":228,"agricultural_evidence":48},[229,233,238],{"code":33,"score":54,"supported":48,"title":230,"abstract":231,"tags":232},[],[27,57],[27],{"code":234,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":235,"abstract":236,"tags":237},"G5",[],[],[221],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":239,"abstract":240,"tags":241},[],[],[29],[243,244],"乡村治理 平台经济 数字乡村 数字农业","乡村治理 平台经济","乡村治理平台经济数字乡村数字农业-2766","10.17645\u002Fpag.12501",{"doi":246,"openalex_id":248,"authors":249,"venue":212,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":209,"card":262,"direction":204,"ingested_from":92},"W7213460533",[250,253,256,259],{"name":251,"orcid":252},"Andrés Arias Astray","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8614-0714",{"name":254,"orcid":255},"Melisa Campana","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3988-8273",{"name":257,"orcid":258},"David Alonso González","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8876-8916",{"name":260,"orcid":261},"Juan Iglesias","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4292-5389",{"tldr":263,"method":264,"finding":265,"direction":90,"opportunity":266},"分析绿色与数字双重转型对边缘群体造成的结构性排斥，提出六种理想类型并给出治理原则。","韦伯理想类型法，结合西班牙统计数据，跨六个双转型部门比较分析。","识别出前期成本、数字素养、地理惩罚和知识剥夺四种排斥机制，导致政治疏离。","可针对数字农业中的知识剥夺与地理惩罚机制，设计参与式治理干预并评估其减贫效果。","2026-09-17T23:30:10.170805Z",{"id":269,"title":270,"url":271,"summary":272,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":273,"source_url":271,"published_at":274,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":275,"score_detail":276,"sources":278,"tags":280,"primary_topic":284,"secondary_topics":285,"classification":286,"search_phrases":298,"slug":301,"view_count":85,"doi":302,"paper":303,"created_at":318},5579,"A Composite Field-Evaluation Framework for Digital Agriculture Maps","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11283264\u002Fv1","A Composite Field-Evaluation Framework for Digital Agriculture Maps。Research Square","Research Square","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",38,{"impact":162,"substance":95,"depth":162,"authority":95,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":277},"预印本提出数字农业地图的田间复合评估框架，方法有一定新意，但摘要信息极少、未经同行评审，公共影响有限，暂不宜进入每日精选。",[279],{"name":273,"url":271},[27,281,282,283],"农业信息化","遥感","地图评估",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":287},{"candidates":288,"agricultural_evidence":48},[289,293],{"code":33,"score":20,"supported":48,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},[57],[57],[281,27],{"code":294,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":295,"abstract":296,"tags":297},"I3",[],[],[282],[299,300],"Research Square 数字农业","农业信息化 地图评估 数字农业 遥感","ResearchSquare数字农业-5579","10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11283264\u002Fv1",{"doi":302,"openalex_id":304,"authors":305,"venue":273,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":271,"card":9,"direction":90,"ingested_from":92},"W7223099987",[306,309,312,315],{"name":307,"orcid":308},"Phillip Lanza","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5545-1744",{"name":310,"orcid":311},"David G. Rossiter","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4558-1286",{"name":313,"orcid":314},"Diana Stuart Sinton","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5828-9001",{"name":316,"orcid":317},"Louis Longchamps","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4761-6094","2026-10-22T11:20:47.463814Z",{"id":320,"title":321,"url":322,"summary":323,"summary_zh":324,"content":9,"source_name":325,"source_url":322,"published_at":274,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":326,"score_detail":327,"sources":330,"tags":332,"primary_topic":337,"secondary_topics":338,"classification":339,"search_phrases":356,"slug":359,"view_count":85,"doi":360,"paper":361,"created_at":373},5578,"Unlocking digital agriculture through new quality productive forces: nonlinear thresholds and spatial spillovers in China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1057\u002Fs41599-026-09510-z","New quality productive forces (NQPF) critically enable agricultural digitisation. Using China as a case study, this paper employs panel data from 284 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2022. The results show that NQPF has a significant promoting effect on agricultural digital transformation and exhibits positive spatial spillover effects, driving not only local transformation but also the development of surrounding regions. Labour skills and innovation capacity play mediating roles in this process. Notably, the enabling effect of NQPF on agricultural digitisation displays significant regional heterogeneity. Threshold analysis indicates that its promoting effect follows a non-linear pattern, characterised by a double threshold effect. Therefore, the development of NQPF should be accelerated, with emphasis placed on regional coordination and talent cultivation, to promote the sustained and in-depth advancement of agricultural digital transformation in accordance with local conditions.","新质生产力（New Quality Productive Forces, NQPF）对农业数字化具有关键赋能作用。本文以中国为案例，采用2011—2022年中国284个地级市的面板数据。结果表明，新质生产力对农业数字化转型具有显著促进作用，并呈现正向空间溢出效应，不仅推动本地转型，也带动周边地区发展。劳动技能与创新能力在这一过程中发挥中介作用。值得注意的是，新质生产力对农业数字化的赋能效应表现出显著的区域异质性。门槛分析表明，其促进作用呈非线性特征，表现为双重门槛效应。因此，应加快新质生产力发展，注重区域协调与人才培养，因地制宜推动农业数字化转型持续深入推进。","Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",81,{"impact":19,"substance":328,"depth":19,"authority":216,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":329},22,"基于284个地级市面板数据的实证研究，揭示新质生产力对农业数字化的非线性门槛与空间溢出效应，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，值得进入每日精选。",[331],{"name":325,"url":322},[27,333,334,335,336],"新质生产力","空间溢出","区域协调","农业数字化转型",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":340},{"candidates":341,"agricultural_evidence":48},[342,346,351],{"code":33,"score":13,"supported":48,"title":343,"abstract":344,"tags":345},[57],[],[336,27],{"code":347,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":348,"abstract":349,"tags":350},"I4",[],[],[334],{"code":352,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":353,"abstract":354,"tags":355},"J2",[],[],[333],[357,358],"新质生产力 农业数字化","地级市 面板数据","新质生产力农业数字化-5578","10.1057\u002Fs41599-026-09510-z",{"doi":360,"openalex_id":362,"authors":363,"venue":325,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":322,"card":368,"direction":90,"ingested_from":92},"W7221723385",[364,366],{"name":365,"orcid":9},"Qingqing Huang",{"name":367,"orcid":9},"Wenjing Guo",{"tldr":369,"method":370,"finding":371,"direction":90,"opportunity":372},"基于中国284个地级市面板数据，检验新质生产力对农业数字化的促进、空间溢出与门槛效应。","2011—2022年284个地级市面板数据，空间计量与门槛回归，中介效应检验。","新质生产力显著促进农业数字化并具正向空间溢出，存在双门槛非线性效应与区域异质性。","可深入探究新质生产力影响农业数字化的微观机制，以及不同区域门槛条件下的差异化政策路径。","2026-10-22T11:20:47.354744Z",{"id":375,"title":376,"url":377,"summary":378,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":379,"source_url":377,"published_at":380,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":381,"is_selected":14,"score":382,"score_detail":383,"sources":385,"tags":389,"primary_topic":391,"secondary_topics":392,"classification":393,"search_phrases":400,"slug":403,"view_count":85,"doi":404,"paper":405,"created_at":417},5396,"Understanding the Digital Agriculture Landscape in Central Africa: 2000-2026 Systematic Review.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.22601.71520","Understanding the Digital Agriculture Landscape in Central Africa: 2000-2026 Systematic Review.。OpenAlex","OpenAlex","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z",25,37,{"impact":162,"substance":95,"depth":162,"authority":95,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":384},"中非数字农业系统综述，主题相关但摘要信息极少，仅题录级元数据，增量与权威性有限，不建议进入每日精选。",[386,387],{"name":379,"url":377},{"name":379,"url":388},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.16146.41922",[27,168,281,390],"中非",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":394},{"candidates":395,"agricultural_evidence":48},[396],{"code":33,"score":216,"supported":48,"title":397,"abstract":398,"tags":399},[57],[57],[281,27,168],[401,402],"中非 数字农业","农业信息化 数字农业 智慧农业 中非","中非数字农业-5396","10.13140\u002Frg.2.2.22601.71520",{"doi":404,"openalex_id":406,"authors":407,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":85,"oa_url":377,"card":9,"direction":90,"ingested_from":92},"W7222930115",[408,410,412,415],{"name":409,"orcid":9},"Anani Ogou",{"name":411,"orcid":9},"Henry Chotangui",{"name":413,"orcid":414},"Honoré Beyegue-Djonko","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0004-6447-5889",{"name":416,"orcid":9},"Christopher Mubeteneh Tankou","2026-10-20T23:30:22.542913Z"]