[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3445":3,"related-3445":81},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":8,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":66,"slug":69,"view_count":19,"doi":8,"paper":70,"created_at":80},3445,"《产业链视角下电商驱动农业数字化转型的理论解构与案例分析——兼论农业'产业大脑'的经验启示》","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanzj.com\u002Fhek\u002Fzgncgc\u002Fmulu\u002F646984.html","王昕天、荆林波、冯章伟基于产业链视角从技术采纳模型和产业链联动效应出发，建立电商驱动农业数字化转型两阶段模型。通过临安山核桃、武乡小米和新平脐橙三个农业特色产业案例比较，提炼电商驱动农业数字化转型的特征：本质是农业借助数字技术实现农产品商品化、农业功能多样化和涉农服务价值化；农业社会化服务滞后是重要制约；数据开放共享是关键支撑；标准化程度是影响农业数字化转型扩散的核心要素。",null,"《中国农村经济》\u002F宁波大学商学院","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,78,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":21},18,22,14,6,1,"核心期刊论文，以三地特色产业案例构建电商驱动农业数字化转型两阶段模型，理论增量与案例比较扎实，对数字乡村与产业大脑实践有参考价值。",[23],{"name":9,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"农村电商","农业数字化","农业产业链","产业大脑","农业社会化服务",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,50,56,61],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":49},4,true,[],[48],"社会化服务",[29],{"code":51,"score":52,"supported":13,"title":53,"abstract":54,"tags":55},"I1",2,[],[],[28,26],{"code":57,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":58,"abstract":59,"tags":60},"E5",[],[],[25],{"code":62,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":63,"abstract":64,"tags":65},"I",[],[],[26],[67,68],"临安山核桃 电商 数字化","武乡小米 新平脐橙 产业链","临安山核桃电商数字化-3445",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":71,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":8,"card":73,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},[],0,{"tldr":74,"method":75,"finding":76,"direction":77,"opportunity":78},"从产业链视角构建电商驱动农业数字化转型的两阶段模型，并用三个特色产业案例验证。","技术采纳模型与产业链联动效应，比较临安山核桃、武乡小米、新平脐橙案例。","转型本质是农产品商品化、农业功能多样化与服务价值化；社会化服务滞后、数据共享与标准化是关键。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可量化测度社会化服务、数据开放与标准化对转型扩散的影响，并探索农业'产业大脑'的落地机制。","agent","2026-09-25T00:09:34.507410Z",{"total":19,"page":20,"page_size":19,"items":82},[83,196,247,320,419,474],{"id":84,"title":85,"url":86,"summary":87,"summary_zh":88,"content":8,"source_name":89,"source_url":86,"published_at":90,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":91,"score_detail":92,"sources":96,"tags":98,"primary_topic":102,"secondary_topics":103,"classification":104,"search_phrases":167,"slug":170,"view_count":19,"doi":171,"paper":172,"created_at":195},3193,"Does Agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Use Improve Grain Production Efficiency? Evidence from Rural China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.foodpol.2026.103196","Enhancing grain production efficiency (GPE) is critical for ensuring food security and promoting a more resource-efficient agricultural transformation, particularly in smallholder systems where conventional machinery faces scale and terrain constraints. China’s rapid adoption of agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) offers an opportunity to assess whether digital machinery can improve efficiency without relying on farm expansion. Yet evidence on how UAV use intensity affects GPE, and on the conditions under which gains emerge, remains limited. Using data from 2,030 grain-producing households across nine provinces in the 2022 China Rural Revitalisation Survey, we measure GPE using a super-efficiency slacks-based measure model and estimate the effects of UAV use intensity. The results show a significant U-shaped relationship between UAV use intensity and GPE, with efficiency gains emerging only after UAV use intensity exceeds a certain threshold. UAV use affects GPE primarily through labour substitution and is nonlinearly associated with pesticide inputs. Besides, village-level agricultural service organisations strengthen the positive effects of UAV use, indicating that service provision complements the use of technology. The efficiency effects are stronger in western China and rice production systems, where conventional machinery is relatively constrained. These findings suggest that the benefits of agricultural UAVs depend not simply on adoption, but on sufficiently intensive use and supportive service institutions. Policies that expand access to UAV services and promote their effective integration into farm operations can improve factor allocation and grain production efficiency, especially in areas where conventional mechanisation is less adaptable. More broadly, these efforts can support agricultural digitalisation and sustainable agricultural modernisation.","提升粮食生产效率（GPE）对于保障粮食安全和推动资源节约型农业转型至关重要，尤其是在常规机械面临规模和地形约束的小农户体系中。中国农业无人机（UAV）的快速普及，为评估数字机械能否在不依赖农场规模扩大的情况下提升效率提供了契机。然而，关于无人机使用强度如何影响粮食生产效率以及增益在何种条件下显现的证据仍然有限。基于2022年中国乡村振兴调查中九个省份2030个粮食种植户的数据，我们采用超效率松弛测度模型测算粮食生产效率，并估计无人机使用强度的影响。结果表明，无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率之间呈显著的U型关系，效率增益仅在无人机使用强度超过一定阈值后才会显现。无人机使用主要通过劳动替代影响粮食生产效率，并与农药投入呈非线性关联。此外，村级农业服务组织强化了无人机使用的正向效应，表明服务供给与技术使用具有互补性。效率效应在中国西部和水稻生产体系中更强，这些地区常规机械受约束相对较大。这些发现表明，农业无人机的效益不仅取决于是否采用，还取决于足够密集的使用和支持性服务制度。扩大无人机服务可及性并促进其有效融入农场经营的政策，可以改善要素配置和粮食生产效率，尤其是在常规机械化适应性较差的地区。更广泛而言，这些努力能够支持农业数字化和可持续农业现代化。","Food Policy","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z",86,{"impact":17,"substance":93,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":94,"relevant":20,"comment":95},23,9,"基于2030户九省调查的实证研究，揭示无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率的U型关系及服务组织互补作用，方法规范、结论有政策价值，值得进入每日精选。",[97],{"name":89,"url":86},[99,100,26,29,101],"智慧农业","农业无人机","粮食生产效率",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":105},{"candidates":106,"agricultural_evidence":45},[107,114,121,128,135,142,147,153,159,163],{"code":31,"score":108,"supported":45,"title":109,"abstract":110,"tags":113},7,[],[111,112],"小农户","smallholder",[29],{"code":115,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":116,"abstract":117,"tags":120},"A1",[],[118,119],"水稻","rice",[],{"code":122,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":123,"abstract":124,"tags":127},"A8",[],[125,126],"粮食安全","food security",[],{"code":129,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":130,"abstract":131,"tags":134},"F4",[],[132,133],"农药","pesticide",[],{"code":136,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":138,"abstract":139,"tags":141},"F5",3,[],[140],"机械化",[],{"code":35,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":143,"abstract":144,"tags":146},[],[145],"乡村振兴",[],{"code":148,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":149,"abstract":150,"tags":152},"H8",[],[151],"可持续农业",[],{"code":154,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":155,"abstract":156,"tags":158},"J2",[],[157],"农业现代化",[],{"code":51,"score":52,"supported":13,"title":160,"abstract":161,"tags":162},[],[],[26,99],{"code":62,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":164,"abstract":165,"tags":166},[],[],[26],[168,169],"农业无人机 粮食生产效率","中国农村振兴调查 无人机","农业无人机粮食生产效率-3193","10.1016\u002Fj.foodpol.2026.103196",{"doi":171,"openalex_id":173,"authors":174,"venue":89,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":86,"card":188,"direction":77,"ingested_from":194},"W7213921092",[175,177,180,182,185],{"name":176,"orcid":8},"Xia Xu",{"name":178,"orcid":179},"Xianhui Geng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3998-7589",{"name":181,"orcid":8},"Zhenzhen Liu",{"name":183,"orcid":184},"Guangqiao Cao","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9364-3376",{"name":186,"orcid":187},"Peng Yuan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3019-0688",{"tldr":189,"method":190,"finding":191,"direction":192,"opportunity":193},"基于中国农村调查数据，研究无人机使用强度对粮食生产效率的影响及条件。","2022年中国乡村振兴调查2030户数据，超效率SBM模型测效率。","无人机使用强度与粮食生产效率呈U型关系，需超过阈值才增效，主要通过劳动替代。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","可探究无人机服务组织与农户技术采纳的协同机制，及不同作物和区域的最优使用强度阈值。","openalex","2026-09-22T23:30:32.180844Z",{"id":197,"title":198,"url":199,"summary":200,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":201,"source_url":8,"published_at":202,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":203,"sources":208,"tags":210,"primary_topic":213,"secondary_topics":214,"classification":215,"search_phrases":234,"slug":237,"view_count":72,"doi":238,"paper":239,"created_at":246},5457,"数字化水平、农业社会化服务对农业现代化的影响 (Impact of Digitalization and Agricultural Socialized Services on Agricultural Modernization)","http:\u002F\u002Fzgnjhxb.niam.com.cn\u002FCN\u002F10.13733\u002Fj.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2026.10.031","基于2013—2023年30个省份面板数据，熵值TOPSIS法测度农业现代化指数，双向固定效应模型检验机制。数字化显著促进农业现代化，经市场化水平传导，农业社会化服务起调节作用。对非粮食主产区显著，对主产区不显著。","中国农机化学报 2026-10-20","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",{"impact":16,"substance":204,"depth":205,"authority":206,"freshness":94,"relevant":20,"comment":207},21,17,13,"基于30省十年面板数据的实证研究，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，但属学术论文而非产业事件，适合精选但非头条。",[209],{"name":201,"url":199},[211,212,157,29],"数字乡村","省级面板",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":216},{"candidates":217,"agricultural_evidence":45},[218,224,229],{"code":154,"score":219,"supported":45,"title":220,"abstract":222,"tags":223},20,[157,221],"agricultural modernization",[157],[157],{"code":31,"score":225,"supported":45,"title":226,"abstract":227,"tags":228},12,[48],[48],[29],{"code":230,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":231,"abstract":232,"tags":233},"I6",[],[],[211],[235,236],"数字化 农业社会化服务 农业现代化","熵值TOPSIS 农业现代化指数","数字化农业社会化服务农业现代化-5457","10.13733\u002Fj.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2026.10.031",{"doi":238,"openalex_id":8,"authors":240,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":8,"card":241,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},[],{"tldr":242,"method":243,"finding":244,"direction":77,"opportunity":245},"用省级面板数据检验数字化对农业现代化的促进机制。","2013—2023年30省面板数据，熵值TOPSIS测度，双向固定效应模型。","数字化显著促进农业现代化，经市场化传导，社会化服务起调节作用，主产区不显著。","可探究粮食主产区数字化效应不显著的成因，及社会化服务与数字化的协同机制。","2026-10-21T00:10:07.928719Z",{"id":248,"title":249,"url":250,"summary":251,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":252,"source_url":8,"published_at":253,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":254,"sources":256,"tags":258,"primary_topic":262,"secondary_topics":263,"classification":275,"search_phrases":308,"slug":311,"view_count":72,"doi":8,"paper":312,"created_at":319},4735,"干旱区农技社会化服务试点政策对县域粮食生产的激励效应——基于双重机器学习因果推断","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F176878.html","基于2015至2023年200县面板,采用双重差分与双重机器学习方法评估2021年农业社会化服务试点政策。结果显示政策显著促进县域粮食产量,但呈短期脉冲效应,中等收入地区呈倒U型,主要依赖规模扩张而非效率扩张路径","干旱区资源与环境 2026-10-08","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":255},"基于200县面板与双重机器学习的因果推断，方法新颖、数据扎实，对评估社会化服务试点政策有实质参考价值。",[257],{"name":252,"url":250},[125,259,260,29,261],"因果推断","县域农业","试点政策",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[264,269],{"code":265,"slug":266,"name":267,"path":268,"parent_code":62},"I2","agricultural-ai","农业AI与大模型","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-ai",{"code":270,"slug":271,"name":272,"path":273,"parent_code":274},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":276},{"candidates":277,"agricultural_evidence":45},[278,282,288,293,299,303],{"code":31,"score":225,"supported":45,"title":279,"abstract":280,"tags":281},[48],[48],[29],{"code":265,"score":283,"supported":45,"title":284,"abstract":286,"tags":287},11,[285],"机器学习",[285],[],{"code":289,"score":94,"supported":45,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},"I7",[259],[],[259],{"code":270,"score":294,"supported":45,"title":295,"abstract":297,"tags":298},8,[296],"干旱",[],[],{"code":122,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":300,"abstract":301,"tags":302},[],[],[125],{"code":304,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":307},"G4",[],[],[260],[309,310],"农业社会化服务试点 县域粮食产量","双重机器学习 粮食生产","农业社会化服务试点县域粮食产量-4735",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":313,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":8,"card":314,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},[],{"tldr":315,"method":316,"finding":317,"direction":77,"opportunity":318},"评估干旱区农技社会化服务试点政策对县域粮食产量的因果效应。","2015-2023年200县面板，双重差分与双重机器学习因果推断。","政策显著增产但为短期脉冲效应，中等收入地区呈倒U型，靠规模扩张而非效率提升。","可探究政策长期效应衰减机制及如何转向效率提升型服务模式。","2026-10-12T00:11:14.975039Z",{"id":321,"title":322,"url":323,"summary":324,"summary_zh":325,"content":8,"source_name":326,"source_url":323,"published_at":327,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":328,"score_detail":329,"sources":331,"tags":333,"primary_topic":338,"secondary_topics":339,"classification":340,"search_phrases":399,"slug":402,"view_count":20,"doi":403,"paper":404,"created_at":418},4557,"The impact of agricultural socialized services on grain farmers’ agricultural eco‑economic efficiency","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1880279","Developing agricultural socialized services (ASS) while promoting green and low-carbon grain production is an important component of agricultural modernization in China. Although previous studies have examined the effects of ASS on agricultural productivity, farm income, and individual input use, it remains unclear whether ASS improve household-level agricultural eco-economic efficiency (AEE), which jointly accounts for economic output, resource use, and environmental costs. Evidence is also limited regarding the factor-allocation channels and production conditions underlying this relationship. Using survey data from 5,992 grain-producing households across 14 provinces in China, this study examines household-level AEE and examines its relationship with ASS adoption using OLS and an instrumental-variable two-stage least squares specification. The results indicate that: (1) ASS adoption is positively associated with grain farmers’ AEE; (2) the estimated relationship varies across farm sizes and crop types, with a more pronounced positive estimate among farmers operating at least 2 ha, but a negative estimate among wheat-growing households; and (3) ASS adoption is associated with a lower share of fertilizer and pesticide expenditure in total variable production costs, whereas no statistically significant labor-reallocation channel is identified. These findings suggest that ASS policies should improve service quality, reduce smallholders’ barriers to service access, develop crop- and production-stage-specific service packages, and promote more precise management of agricultural inputs.","发展农业社会化服务（agricultural socialized services，ASS）并推动粮食绿色低碳生产，是中国农业现代化的重要组成部分。尽管已有研究考察了ASS对农业生产力、农户收入及单项投入品使用的影响，但ASS是否能够提升农户层面的农业生态经济效率（agricultural eco-economic efficiency，AEE）——该效率综合考量经济产出、资源利用与环境成本——仍不明确。关于这一关系背后的要素配置渠道和生产条件，现有证据也较为有限。本研究利用中国14个省份5 992户粮食种植户的调查数据，测度农户层面的AEE，并采用OLS和工具变量两阶段最小二乘（IV-2SLS）方法考察其与ASS采纳的关系。结果表明：（1）ASS采纳与粮农AEE呈正相关；（2）这一估计关系因经营规模和作物类型而异，在经营面积不低于2公顷的农户中正向估计更为显著，但在小麦种植户中呈负向估计；（3）ASS采纳与肥料和农药支出在总可变生产成本中占比下降相关，而未发现统计上显著的劳动力再配置渠道。上述发现表明，ASS政策应提升服务质量，降低小农户获取服务的门槛，开发针对特定作物和生产环节的服务包，并推动农业投入品更为精准的管理。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-09T00:00:00Z",81,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":16,"authority":18,"freshness":94,"relevant":20,"comment":330},"基于14省5992户粮农调查的实证研究，方法规范、数据扎实，结论对农业社会化服务政策有参考价值，但属学术论文，公共传播性有限。",[332],{"name":326,"url":323},[334,29,335,336,337],"农业绿色发展","农户调查","粮食生产","生态经济效率",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":341},{"candidates":342,"agricultural_evidence":45},[343,347,354,361,365,369,375,381,386,390,395],{"code":31,"score":294,"supported":45,"title":344,"abstract":345,"tags":346},[],[48,111],[29,335],{"code":348,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":349,"abstract":350,"tags":353},"A2",[],[351,352],"小麦","wheat",[],{"code":355,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":356,"abstract":357,"tags":360},"F3",[],[358,359],"肥料","fertilizer",[],{"code":129,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":362,"abstract":363,"tags":364},[],[132,133],[],{"code":154,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":366,"abstract":367,"tags":368},[],[157,221],[],{"code":370,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":371,"abstract":372,"tags":374},"G6",[],[373],"农户收入",[],{"code":376,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":380},"H6",[],[379],"农业生态",[],{"code":382,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":383,"abstract":384,"tags":385},"A",[],[],[336],{"code":122,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":387,"abstract":388,"tags":389},[],[],[336],{"code":391,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":392,"abstract":393,"tags":394},"H4",[],[],[334],{"code":148,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":396,"abstract":397,"tags":398},[],[],[334],[400,401],"农业社会化服务 粮食 生态经济效率","农户 化肥农药 投入","农业社会化服务粮食生态经济效率-4557","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1880279",{"doi":403,"openalex_id":405,"authors":406,"venue":326,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":411,"card":412,"direction":416,"ingested_from":194},"W7221161337",[407,409],{"name":408,"orcid":8},"Wensu Tang",{"name":410,"orcid":8},"Xiaohui Li","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1880279\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":413,"method":414,"finding":415,"direction":416,"opportunity":417},"基于14省5992户粮农调查，评估农业社会化服务对农户农业生态经济效率的影响。","OLS与工具变量两阶段最小二乘法，使用14省粮食种植户调查数据。","农业社会化服务提升生态经济效率，规模≥2公顷更明显，小麦户为负；降低化肥农药成本占比。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究社会化服务对小麦户负效应的成因，及分作物分环节服务包的环境经济协同机制。","2026-10-10T23:30:06.258239Z",{"id":420,"title":421,"url":422,"summary":423,"summary_zh":424,"content":8,"source_name":326,"source_url":422,"published_at":253,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":425,"score_detail":426,"sources":428,"tags":430,"primary_topic":435,"secondary_topics":436,"classification":437,"search_phrases":450,"slug":453,"view_count":72,"doi":454,"paper":455,"created_at":473},4484,"What are the configuration paths for improving the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931860","To promote the growth of agricultural enterprises and enhance their ability to collaborate with and benefit farmers, improving the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises has become an urgent issue. Drawing on the perspective of interest linkage mechanism and employing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method, this paper explores pathways for enhancing the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises, then conducting a series of heterogeneity analyses and robustness tests. The main findings are as follows. No component is individually necessary. Two configurations are sufficient for high performance: cooperative trust combined with resource sharing, and cooperative trust combined with mutual benefit. The configurations associated with low performance are structurally distinct from the negation of these pathways, confirming causal asymmetry. Sub-sample analyses show that the sufficient configuration shifts systematically with governance architecture and service breadth: mutual benefit is pivotal where enterprises contract with households directly, resource sharing becomes pivotal once a cooperative or village collective mediates the relationship, and full-item providers require all three components jointly. These findings can provide guidance for improving the operational performance of land trusteeship enterprises. Unlike the regression only to analyze the net effect of individual influencing factors, this study based on perspective of interest linkage mechanism to examine the coupled effects of multiple influencing factors.","为推动农业企业发展并增强其联农带农能力，提升土地托管企业的经营绩效已成为紧迫议题。本文基于利益联结机制视角，运用模糊集定性比较分析方法，探讨土地托管企业经营绩效的提升路径，并开展了一系列异质性分析与稳健性检验。主要发现如下：各条件变量均非单独构成必要条件。存在两种足以引致高绩效的条件组态：合作信任与资源共享的组合，以及合作信任与互惠互利的组合。与低绩效相关联的组态在结构上不同于这些路径的否定形式，证实了因果非对称性。子样本分析表明，充分条件组态随治理架构与服务广度发生系统性变化：在企业直接与农户签约的情形下，互惠互利发挥关键作用；一旦由合作社或村集体充当中介，资源共享则成为关键要素；而提供全程服务的企业则需要三个条件同时具备。上述发现可为提升土地托管企业的经营绩效提供指导。与仅通过回归分析考察单个影响因素的净效应不同，本研究基于利益联结机制视角，考察多重影响因素的耦合效应。",72,{"impact":225,"substance":204,"depth":205,"authority":206,"freshness":94,"relevant":20,"comment":427},"基于fsQCA方法揭示土地托管企业高绩效的组态路径，方法新颖、结论具体，对农业社会化服务主体培育有参考价值，但属学术个案研究，影响范围有限。",[429],{"name":326,"url":422},[29,431,432,433,434],"土地托管","新型经营主体","利益联结机制","农业经营绩效",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":438},{"candidates":439,"agricultural_evidence":45},[440,445],{"code":31,"score":441,"supported":45,"title":442,"abstract":443,"tags":444},5,[],[431],[29,431],{"code":304,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":446,"abstract":447,"tags":449},[],[448],"联农带农",[],[451,452],"土地托管企业 经营绩效 利益联结","农业社会化服务 农业经营绩效 利益联结机制 新型经营主体","土地托管企业经营绩效利益联结-4484","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931860",{"doi":454,"openalex_id":456,"authors":457,"venue":326,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":422,"card":468,"direction":77,"ingested_from":194},"W7221037690",[458,460,462,465],{"name":459,"orcid":8},"Shan Zheng",{"name":461,"orcid":8},"Guanqi Zhao",{"name":463,"orcid":464},"Guoqing Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-6629-846X",{"name":466,"orcid":467},"Lianghong Yu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6368-6167",{"tldr":469,"method":470,"finding":471,"direction":77,"opportunity":472},"用fsQCA分析土地托管企业高绩效的组态路径及异质性。","模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA），基于利益联结机制视角。","高绩效需合作信任与资源共享或互惠组合，且路径随治理结构和服务广度变化。","可将利益联结组态与数字化平台数据结合，探究数字中介如何改变托管绩效路径。","2026-10-09T23:30:06.367786Z",{"id":475,"title":476,"url":477,"summary":478,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":479,"source_url":8,"published_at":480,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":45,"score":481,"score_detail":482,"sources":486,"tags":488,"primary_topic":491,"secondary_topics":492,"classification":493,"search_phrases":512,"slug":515,"view_count":137,"doi":8,"paper":516,"created_at":523},4284,"When e-commerce meets smallholders: Boosting incomes and widening gaps in rural China's anti-poverty policy","https:\u002F\u002Fbesjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\u002Ffeed\u002F14678276\u002Fmost-recent","Wenqi Duan等评估中国电子商务进农村(ECC)项目对小型农户农业经营收入水平与分配的影响。研究采用准实验设计发现：ECC项目显著增加家庭人均农业经营收入；通过扩大市场接入推动收入增长，三大机制为经营规模扩大、产出价格提高、向高附加值作物转移；然而这些收益分配不均，项目扩大小农户间收入差距，主要归因于人力、生产、数字资本初始差异。强调电商政策需配套措施缓解异质性初始禀赋带来的差距。","American Journal of Agricultural Economics 10.1002\u002Fajae.70086 2026","2026-10-04T00:00:00Z",89,{"impact":483,"substance":93,"depth":16,"authority":484,"freshness":94,"relevant":20,"comment":485},24,15,"顶刊准实验研究揭示电商进农村项目增收与扩大差距的双重效应，政策与学术价值兼具，值得入选每日精选。",[487],{"name":479,"url":477},[25,211,373,489,490],"收入差距","电商扶贫",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":494},{"candidates":495,"agricultural_evidence":45},[496,500,504,508],{"code":31,"score":137,"supported":45,"title":497,"abstract":498,"tags":499},[],[111],[],{"code":57,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":501,"abstract":502,"tags":503},[],[],[25],{"code":370,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":505,"abstract":506,"tags":507},[],[],[373],{"code":230,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":509,"abstract":510,"tags":511},[],[],[211],[513,514],"电子商务进农村 ECC 农户收入","农村电商 小农户 收入差距","电子商务进农村ECC农户收入-4284",{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":517,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":8,"card":518,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},[],{"tldr":519,"method":520,"finding":521,"direction":77,"opportunity":522},"评估中国电商进农村项目对农户收入及差距的影响","准实验设计，分析ECC项目对农户农业经营收入的作用","项目显著提高人均农业收入，但扩大农户间收入差距","可研究数字资本差异下电商政策配套措施，缩小农户收入差距","2026-10-06T00:05:04.824292Z"]