[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3708":3,"related-3708":72},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":9,"source_url":8,"published_at":10,"category":11,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":14,"score_detail":15,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":30,"secondary_topics":36,"classification":37,"search_phrases":67,"slug":70,"view_count":51,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":71},3708,"绥化市绥棱县：五良融合助力粮食丰产丰收","https:\u002F\u002Fhlj.people.com.cn\u002Fn2\u002F2026\u002F0923\u002Fc220005-41705408.html","绥棱县锚定现代化大农业发展目标，统筹推进良法、良制、良种、良田、良机协同发力。土地托管面积达150万亩，覆盖率超71%。双合村全村14800亩旱田全部纳入合作社托管，托管地块大豆每亩增产60斤、玉米每亩增产130斤。",null,"人民网黑龙江","2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","报道",10,false,57,{"impact":16,"substance":17,"depth":18,"authority":12,"freshness":19,"relevant":20,"comment":21},14,16,12,5,1,"县级五良融合与土地托管实践，数据具体但层级偏地方，时效性一般，可作为主题聚合素材而非每日精选。",[23],{"name":9,"url":6},[25,26,27,28,29],"粮食单产提升","黑龙江农业","土地托管","五良融合","大豆玉米",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":41},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":42,"agricultural_evidence":45},[43,49,56,62],{"code":31,"score":44,"supported":45,"title":46,"abstract":47,"tags":48},4,true,[],[27],[27],{"code":50,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":52,"abstract":53,"tags":55},"A3",3,[],[54],"玉米",[],{"code":57,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":58,"abstract":59,"tags":61},"A4",[],[60],"大豆",[],{"code":63,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":64,"abstract":65,"tags":66},"A8",[],[],[25],[68,69],"绥棱县 土地托管 大豆玉米","绥化 五良融合 粮食增产","绥棱县土地托管大豆玉米-3708","2026-09-29T00:08:20.118266Z",{"total":73,"page":20,"page_size":73,"items":74},6,[75,140,183,251,305,397],{"id":76,"title":77,"url":78,"summary":79,"summary_zh":80,"content":8,"source_name":81,"source_url":78,"published_at":82,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":84,"score_detail":85,"sources":91,"tags":93,"primary_topic":98,"secondary_topics":99,"classification":100,"search_phrases":113,"slug":116,"view_count":117,"doi":118,"paper":119,"created_at":139},4484,"What are the configuration paths for improving the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931860","To promote the growth of agricultural enterprises and enhance their ability to collaborate with and benefit farmers, improving the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises has become an urgent issue. Drawing on the perspective of interest linkage mechanism and employing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method, this paper explores pathways for enhancing the business performance of land trusteeship enterprises, then conducting a series of heterogeneity analyses and robustness tests. The main findings are as follows. No component is individually necessary. Two configurations are sufficient for high performance: cooperative trust combined with resource sharing, and cooperative trust combined with mutual benefit. The configurations associated with low performance are structurally distinct from the negation of these pathways, confirming causal asymmetry. Sub-sample analyses show that the sufficient configuration shifts systematically with governance architecture and service breadth: mutual benefit is pivotal where enterprises contract with households directly, resource sharing becomes pivotal once a cooperative or village collective mediates the relationship, and full-item providers require all three components jointly. These findings can provide guidance for improving the operational performance of land trusteeship enterprises. Unlike the regression only to analyze the net effect of individual influencing factors, this study based on perspective of interest linkage mechanism to examine the coupled effects of multiple influencing factors.","为推动农业企业发展并增强其联农带农能力，提升土地托管企业的经营绩效已成为紧迫议题。本文基于利益联结机制视角，运用模糊集定性比较分析方法，探讨土地托管企业经营绩效的提升路径，并开展了一系列异质性分析与稳健性检验。主要发现如下：各条件变量均非单独构成必要条件。存在两种足以引致高绩效的条件组态：合作信任与资源共享的组合，以及合作信任与互惠互利的组合。与低绩效相关联的组态在结构上不同于这些路径的否定形式，证实了因果非对称性。子样本分析表明，充分条件组态随治理架构与服务广度发生系统性变化：在企业直接与农户签约的情形下，互惠互利发挥关键作用；一旦由合作社或村集体充当中介，资源共享则成为关键要素；而提供全程服务的企业则需要三个条件同时具备。上述发现可为提升土地托管企业的经营绩效提供指导。与仅通过回归分析考察单个影响因素的净效应不同，本研究基于利益联结机制视角，考察多重影响因素的耦合效应。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z","论文",72,{"impact":18,"substance":86,"depth":87,"authority":88,"freshness":89,"relevant":20,"comment":90},21,17,13,9,"基于fsQCA方法揭示土地托管企业高绩效的组态路径，方法新颖、结论具体，对农业社会化服务主体培育有参考价值，但属学术个案研究，影响范围有限。",[92],{"name":81,"url":78},[94,27,95,96,97],"农业社会化服务","新型经营主体","利益联结机制","农业经营绩效",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":101},{"candidates":102,"agricultural_evidence":45},[103,107],{"code":31,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":104,"abstract":105,"tags":106},[],[27],[94,27],{"code":108,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":109,"abstract":110,"tags":112},"G4",[],[111],"联农带农",[],[114,115],"土地托管企业 经营绩效 利益联结","农业社会化服务 农业经营绩效 利益联结机制 新型经营主体","土地托管企业经营绩效利益联结-4484",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931860",{"doi":118,"openalex_id":120,"authors":121,"venue":81,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":78,"card":132,"direction":136,"ingested_from":138},"W7221037690",[122,124,126,129],{"name":123,"orcid":8},"Shan Zheng",{"name":125,"orcid":8},"Guanqi Zhao",{"name":127,"orcid":128},"Guoqing Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-6629-846X",{"name":130,"orcid":131},"Lianghong Yu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6368-6167",{"tldr":133,"method":134,"finding":135,"direction":136,"opportunity":137},"用fsQCA分析土地托管企业高绩效的组态路径及异质性。","模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA），基于利益联结机制视角。","高绩效需合作信任与资源共享或互惠组合，且路径随治理结构和服务广度变化。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将利益联结组态与数字化平台数据结合，探究数字中介如何改变托管绩效路径。","openalex","2026-10-09T23:30:06.367786Z",{"id":141,"title":142,"url":143,"summary":144,"summary_zh":145,"content":8,"source_name":81,"source_url":143,"published_at":146,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":84,"score_detail":147,"sources":149,"tags":151,"primary_topic":155,"secondary_topics":156,"classification":157,"search_phrases":164,"slug":167,"view_count":168,"doi":169,"paper":170,"created_at":182},3149,"Measurement of interest linkage level between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers in China: based on TOPSIS method with comprehensive weighting","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931691","The cooperative outcomes between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers have fallen substantially short of expectations due to trust deficits, factor mismatches, and imbalances in benefit distribution. The root cause of this paradox lies in the absence or weakness of interest linkage mechanisms. Measuring the interest linkage level and optimizing the interest linkage mechanism are therefore key to resolving this issue, yet existing research has paid insufficient attention to this problem. Accordingly, first, this study innovatively constructs an indicator system for measuring the interest linkage level in land trusteeship based on the interest linkage theory. Second, the AHP and Entropy method was used to determine the subjective and objective weights. Finally, we use the TOPSIS method to measure the interest linkage level, analyze its spatio-temporal characteristics and heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) Overall, the interest linkage level between land trusteeship enterprises and farmers stands at 0.516, representing a moderate level. Among the three sub-dimensions, resource sharing is relatively high, mutual benefit is moderate, and cooperative trust is comparatively low, indicating that weak trust constitutes the most prominent shortcoming of the current interest linkage mechanism. (2) In terms of temporal changes, between 2021 and 2022, the levels of interest linkage, cooperative trust, resource sharing, and mutual benefit all exhibited an upward trend, with resource sharing recording the fastest rate of increase. In terms of regional disparities, Jining city of China exhibits the highest level of interest linkage, whereas Weifang city records the lowest. (3) Regarding heterogeneity, the interest linkage level is highest for small-scale pure farmers, followed in descending order by part-time farmers and large-scale specialized farmers. The interest linkage level increases as the number of trusteeship service links expands. Among the three principal trusteeship models, differences in interest linkage levels exist but are not pronounced. The findings contribute to the theoretical development of interest linkage mechanisms and offer actionable policy implications for improving enterprise–farmer cooperative arrangements.","土地托管企业与农户的合作成效因信任缺失、要素错配与利益分配失衡而显著低于预期，这一悖论的根源在于利益联结机制的缺位或薄弱。因此，测度利益联结水平并优化利益联结机制是破解该问题的关键，但现有研究对此关注不足。据此，本研究首先基于利益联结理论，创新性地构建了土地托管利益联结水平测度指标体系；其次，采用层次分析法与熵权法确定主客观权重；最后，运用TOPSIS法测度利益联结水平，并分析其时空特征与异质性。结果表明：（1）总体而言，土地托管企业与农户的利益联结水平为0.516，处于中等水平。在三个子维度中，资源共享水平相对较高，互利共赢处于中等水平，合作信任水平相对较低，表明信任薄弱是当前利益联结机制最为突出的短板。（2）从时间变化来看，2021—2022年间，利益联结水平、合作信任、资源共享与互利共赢均呈上升趋势，其中资源共享增速最快。从区域差异来看，中国济宁市的利益联结水平最高，潍坊市最低。（3）从异质性来看，小规模纯农户的利益联结水平最高，其次依次为兼业农户和大规模专业农户。利益联结水平随托管服务环节数量的增加而提高。在三种主要托管模式中，利益联结水平存在差异但并不显著。研究结论有助于推动利益联结机制的理论发展，并为完善企业与农户合作安排提供可操作的政策启示。","2026-09-21T00:00:00Z",{"impact":18,"substance":86,"depth":87,"authority":88,"freshness":89,"relevant":20,"comment":148},"基于AHP-熵权TOPSIS构建土地托管利益联结测度体系，方法有新意、结论具体，但属区域实证研究，公共影响有限。",[150],{"name":81,"url":143},[94,27,152,153,154],"利益联结","农户合作","TOPSIS",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":158},{"candidates":159,"agricultural_evidence":45},[160],{"code":31,"score":19,"supported":45,"title":161,"abstract":162,"tags":163},[],[27],[94,27],[165,166],"土地托管 利益联结 农户","济宁 潍坊 土地托管","土地托管利益联结农户-3149",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1931691",{"doi":169,"openalex_id":171,"authors":172,"venue":81,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":143,"card":177,"direction":136,"ingested_from":138},"W7213937854",[173,174,175],{"name":123,"orcid":8},{"name":127,"orcid":128},{"name":176,"orcid":8},"Yu Lianghong",{"tldr":178,"method":179,"finding":180,"direction":136,"opportunity":181},"构建指标体系并用组合赋权TOPSIS测度中国土地托管企业与农户的利益联结水平。","基于利益联结理论构建指标体系，AHP与熵权法组合赋权，TOPSIS测度。","利益联结整体处中等水平，合作信任最弱；小规模纯农户联结水平最高，托管环节越多水平越高。","可将信任缺失作为切入点，探索数字平台与契约治理如何提升托管利益联结的信任维度。","2026-09-22T23:30:08.537335Z",{"id":184,"title":185,"url":186,"summary":187,"summary_zh":188,"content":8,"source_name":189,"source_url":186,"published_at":190,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":191,"score_detail":192,"sources":196,"tags":198,"primary_topic":204,"secondary_topics":205,"classification":212,"search_phrases":230,"slug":233,"view_count":117,"doi":234,"paper":235,"created_at":250},5592,"Evaluation of Concept-Rank Collapse Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Low-Label Regimes: An Interpretability Capacity Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Selectivity","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193","Concept-based interpretability methods for plant-disease classifiers are typically evaluated by whether their concept activations correlate with human-annotated labels, but this criterion is silent on a prior question: whether the classifier's internal representation retains enough concept-rank structure for any audit to be informative. the present analysis formalises that prior question as an interpretability capacity bound. A classifier is modelled as a concept-rank operator whose singular values govern how much concept-level signal survives the projection from pixel space to class logits, and a collapse audit is defined as the ratio of retained concept-rank energy to total concept energy. Under a low-label regime, where concept annotations are scarce and the audit must be estimated from few labelled examples, the bound predicts that audit reliability degrades as a function of the concept-rank spectrum and the label budget. The analysis is a theoretical and methodological contribution: it derives the bound, states the conditions under which a collapse audit is identifiable, and characterises the operating characteristics of the audit as a decision procedure under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64). Power was estimated across 2000 design cells for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 52 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The bound reframes concept audits as capacity tests rather than fidelity tests, with consequences for how smallholder fungicide-selectivity decisions should be supported by interpretable disease classifiers.","面向植物病害分类器的基于概念的可解释性方法，通常以其概念激活是否与人工标注标签相关作为评价标准，但该标准对一个更先前的问题保持沉默：分类器的内部表征是否保留了足够的概念秩结构，从而使任何审计具有信息量。本分析将该先前问题形式化为一个可解释性容量上界。分类器被建模为概念秩算子，其奇异值支配着从像素空间到类别logits的投影中概念级信号得以保留的程度，并将坍缩审计定义为保留的概念秩能量与总概念能量之比。在低标签情形下，概念标注稀缺且审计必须由少量标注样本估计，该上界预测审计可靠性会随概念秩谱和标签预算的函数而退化。本分析是一项理论和方法论贡献：推导出该上界，陈述坍缩审计可识别的条件，并在声明的方差结构（簇间SD = 6.0，残差SD = 4.5，组内相关系数 = 0.64）下刻画审计作为决策程序的操作特征。在2000个设计单元中，针对簇数为8、16、24和32以及效应量为3、5和8个百分点的情形估计了功效；在80%功效下达到5个百分点需要52个簇。该上界将概念审计重新框定为容量检验而非保真度检验，并对可解释病害分类器应如何支持小农杀菌剂选择性决策具有启示意义。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",69,{"impact":193,"substance":86,"depth":194,"authority":18,"freshness":12,"relevant":20,"comment":195},8,18,"理论方法论文，提出可解释性容量上界并给出审计功效分析，对智慧农业病害识别可信度有参考价值，但属小众方法学研究、缺乏田间实证，暂不宜进入每日精选。",[197],{"name":189,"url":186},[199,200,201,202,203],"智慧农业","农业人工智能","小农户","植物病害识别","可解释性",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[206],{"code":207,"slug":208,"name":209,"path":210,"parent_code":211},"I2","agricultural-ai","农业AI与大模型","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-ai","I",{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":213},{"candidates":214,"agricultural_evidence":45},[215,220,225],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":216,"abstract":218,"tags":219},[217],"smallholder",[217],[201],{"code":207,"score":12,"supported":45,"title":221,"abstract":223,"tags":224},[222],"computer vision",[],[200,202],{"code":226,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":227,"abstract":228,"tags":229},"I1",[],[],[199],[231,232],"农业人工智能 植物病害识别 可解释性 智慧农业","农业人工智能 植物病害识别","农业人工智能植物病害识别可解释性智慧农业-5592","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193",{"doi":234,"openalex_id":236,"authors":237,"venue":189,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":186,"card":244,"direction":248,"ingested_from":138},"W7223137323",[238,240,242],{"name":239,"orcid":8},"Akshay Ramgoolam",{"name":241,"orcid":8},"Priya Bundhoo Appadoo",{"name":243,"orcid":8},"Jean-Noël LEspérance",{"tldr":245,"method":246,"finding":247,"direction":248,"opportunity":249},"提出可解释性容量上界，评估低标签下概念秩崩溃审计的可靠性。","将分类器建模为概念秩算子，推导容量上界并做2000格功效模拟。","审计可靠性随概念秩谱与标签预算下降；5个百分点效应需52个聚类达80%功效。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可将容量上界用于小农户杀菌剂选择性决策的可解释模型审计与标签预算设计。","2026-10-22T11:21:10.425290Z",{"id":252,"title":253,"url":254,"summary":255,"summary_zh":256,"content":8,"source_name":189,"source_url":254,"published_at":190,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":257,"score_detail":258,"sources":261,"tags":263,"primary_topic":266,"secondary_topics":267,"classification":269,"search_phrases":285,"slug":288,"view_count":117,"doi":289,"paper":290,"created_at":304},5590,"Evaluation of Concept-Probe Temporal-Stability Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Seasonal Phenology Drift: An Interpretability Decay Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Timing","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234","Concept-probe audits are increasingly used to certify that a crop-disease classifier's internal representations track the pathological concepts a smallholder would act on, but a probe certified at one point in the season may silently decouple from those concepts as phenology shifts the visual statistics of the field. the present analysis treats that decoupling as a formal object. It defines a temporal-stability audit as a sequence of concept-probe accuracies measured across defined phenological windows, and it derives an interpretability decay bound: the rate at which probe accuracy can fall before the fungicide-timing decision it is meant to support becomes unreliable. The bound is expressed as a function of the probe's initial margin, the drift in concept prevalence between windows, and the classifier's sensitivity to the drifted features, and it yields a certified audit interval rather than a single-point certificate. The paper then characterises the operating characteristics of the audit design under a declared variance structure, using a replication-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator with between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5 and intraclass correlation = 0.64. Power was estimated across 2000 design cells over cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 54 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The contribution is a decision-theoretic account of when a concept-probe certificate expires, and a design rule for scheduling re-audits across the season.","概念探针审计（concept-probe audit）日益被用于验证作物病害分类器的内部表征是否追踪小农户会据以采取行动的病理学概念，但在生长季某一时点获得认证的探针，可能随着物候变化改变田间的视觉统计特征而悄然与这些概念脱钩。本分析将这种脱钩视为一个形式化对象。它将时间稳定性审计（temporal-stability audit）定义为在既定物候窗口内测量的一系列概念探针准确率，并推导出一个可解释性衰减界限（interpretability decay bound）：即探针准确率在其所支持的杀菌剂施用时机决策变得不可靠之前所能下降的速率。该界限表示为探针初始裕度、窗口间概念流行率漂移以及分类器对漂移特征敏感度的函数，并给出一个经认证的审计区间而非单点认证。随后，本文在声明的方差结构下刻画该审计设计的运行特征，采用基于重复的前后对照影响估计量评估，其中组间标准差 = 6.0、残差标准差 = 4.5、组内相关系数 = 0.64。功效在 2000 个设计单元上估计，聚类数取 8、16、24 和 32，效应量取 3、5 和 8 个百分点；在 80% 功效下达到 5 个百分点需要 54 个聚类。本文的贡献在于从决策论角度阐明概念探针认证何时失效，并给出在整个生长季内安排重新审计的设计规则。",70,{"impact":193,"substance":259,"depth":194,"authority":18,"freshness":12,"relevant":20,"comment":260},22,"该论文提出概念探针审计的时序稳定性框架与可解释性衰减界，方法新颖、统计设计扎实，但属小众方法论研究，产业影响有限，适合作为专业精选而非头条。",[262],{"name":189,"url":254},[199,200,201,264,265],"作物病害识别","模型审计",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[268],{"code":207,"slug":208,"name":209,"path":210,"parent_code":211},{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":270},{"candidates":271,"agricultural_evidence":45},[272,277,281],{"code":31,"score":273,"supported":45,"title":274,"abstract":275,"tags":276},15,[217],[201,217],[201],{"code":207,"score":12,"supported":45,"title":278,"abstract":279,"tags":280},[222],[],[264,200],{"code":226,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":282,"abstract":283,"tags":284},[],[],[199],[286,287],"概念探针 时序稳定性 作物病害分类器","杀菌剂 施药时机 可解释性衰减","概念探针时序稳定性作物病害分类器-5590","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234",{"doi":289,"openalex_id":291,"authors":292,"venue":189,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":254,"card":299,"direction":248,"ingested_from":138},"W7223088030",[293,295,297],{"name":294,"orcid":8},"Abdi-Basid Idriss Farah",{"name":296,"orcid":8},"Amina Abdillahi Guedi",{"name":298,"orcid":8},"Moussa Omar Youssouf",{"tldr":300,"method":301,"finding":302,"direction":248,"opportunity":303},"提出概念探针时间稳定性审计与可解释性衰减界，判断何时需重新审计。","定义跨物候窗口探针精度序列，推导衰减界，用BACI复制评估统计功效。","5个百分点效应需54个聚类达80%功效，审计证书会随物候漂移过期。","可将衰减界与再审计调度规则嵌入小农户杀菌剂时机决策支持系统，并验证跨作物泛化。","2026-10-22T11:21:08.978348Z",{"id":306,"title":307,"url":308,"summary":309,"summary_zh":310,"content":8,"source_name":81,"source_url":308,"published_at":190,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":311,"score_detail":312,"sources":315,"tags":317,"primary_topic":322,"secondary_topics":323,"classification":324,"search_phrases":362,"slug":365,"view_count":117,"doi":366,"paper":367,"created_at":396},5548,"Agroecological transition in olive based farming systems among smallholder farms in northwestern Tunisia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1903591","Agricultural intensification has increased production and economic growth but has also generated significant environmental and social challenges that threaten long-term sustainability, highlighting the need for more sustainable farming models. Agroecology offers a promising pathway to enhance resilience and support inclusive rural development. In this context, Tunisia’s olive sector provides a relevant case for examining agroecological transitions in semi-arid smallholder systems. This study evaluates the degree of agroecological transition among smallholder olive farms in the Elles region of northwestern Tunisia using the FAO Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE). Based on a sample of 60 farms, the analysis applies the Characterization of Agroecological Transition (CAET) index, grounded in the 10 Elements of Agroecology, to compare four production systems: (i) olive monoculture, (ii) diversified cropping, (iii) olive–livestock integration, and (iv) integrated olive–crop–livestock systems. Economic, social, environmental and institutional performance were explored using the TAPE Core Criteria of Performance (Step 2) and examined in relation to CAET scores. Results reveal a clear agroecological gradient, with diversified and integrated systems achieving markedly higher CAET scores (up to 52%) compared to monoculture systems (31%). Spearman correlations show strong associations between CAET and key dimensions, including synergy (ρ = 0.79), human and social values (ρ = 0.78), and diversity (ρ = 0.71). Several TAPE economic performance indicators, including monthly income, which ranged from approximately 1,349 TND in monoculture systems to 4,892 TND in diversified olive–crop–livestock systems, were positively associated with higher CAET scores, suggesting that agroecological transition may not necessarily imply a trade-off between productivity and sustainability. However, limited collective action, weak market integration, and insufficient extension services constrain broader adoption. These findings highlight the potential of diversification as a key lever for agroecological transition and underscore the importance of targeted policy support.","农业集约化提高了产量并促进了经济增长，但也产生了威胁长期可持续性的重大环境与社会挑战，凸显了对更可持续耕作模式的需求。农业生态学为增强韧性和支持包容性农村发展提供了一条有前景的路径。在此背景下，突尼斯橄榄产业为研究半干旱小农系统中的农业生态转型提供了相关案例。本研究利用联合国粮农组织农业生态性能评价工具（TAPE），评估突尼斯西北部埃勒斯地区小农橄榄农场的农业生态转型程度。基于60个农场的样本，分析采用以农业生态学十大要素为基础的农业生态转型特征（CAET）指数，比较四种生产系统：（i）橄榄单作，（ii）多样化种植，（iii）橄榄—畜牧结合，以及（iv）橄榄—作物—畜牧综合系统。研究利用TAPE核心性能标准（第二步）探讨经济、社会、环境和制度绩效，并将其与CAET得分进行关联分析。结果揭示了明显的农业生态梯度，多样化与综合系统的CAET得分（最高达52%）显著高于单作系统（31%）。斯皮尔曼相关性分析显示，CAET与关键维度之间存在强关联，包括协同性（ρ = 0.79）、人文与社会价值（ρ = 0.78）和多样性（ρ = 0.71）。若干TAPE经济绩效指标——包括月收入，其从单作系统的约1，349突尼斯第纳尔到橄榄—作物—畜牧多样化系统的4，892突尼斯第纳尔不等——与更高的CAET得分呈正相关，表明农业生态转型未必意味着生产力与可持续性之间的权衡。然而，集体行动有限、市场整合薄弱和推广服务不足制约了更广泛的采纳。这些发现凸显了多样化作为农业生态转型关键杠杆的潜力，并强调了有针对性的政策支持的重要性。",71,{"impact":18,"substance":313,"depth":87,"authority":88,"freshness":89,"relevant":20,"comment":314},20,"基于FAO TAPE方法对突尼斯小农户橄榄系统农生态转型的实证研究，数据扎实、结论有新意，但属区域性案例，公共影响有限。",[316],{"name":81,"url":308},[201,318,319,320,321],"农业转型","生态农业","突尼斯","油橄榄",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":325},{"candidates":326,"agricultural_evidence":45},[327,331,338,344,351,357],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":328,"abstract":329,"tags":330},[217],[217],[201],{"code":332,"score":73,"supported":45,"title":333,"abstract":334,"tags":337},"C",[],[335,336],"畜牧","livestock",[],{"code":35,"score":73,"supported":45,"title":339,"abstract":340,"tags":343},[],[341,342],"农村发展","rural development",[],{"code":345,"score":73,"supported":45,"title":346,"abstract":347,"tags":350},"H6",[],[348,349],"农业生态","agroecology",[],{"code":352,"score":51,"supported":45,"title":353,"abstract":354,"tags":356},"H7",[],[355],"干旱",[],{"code":358,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":359,"abstract":360,"tags":361},"H8",[],[],[319],[363,364],"突尼斯 油橄榄 小农户","TAPE 农生态 评估","突尼斯油橄榄小农户-5548","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1903591",{"doi":366,"openalex_id":368,"authors":369,"venue":81,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":308,"card":390,"direction":394,"ingested_from":138},"W7223108121",[370,372,374,377,380,382,385,388],{"name":371,"orcid":8},"Rihab Mejri",{"name":373,"orcid":8},"Meriem Oueslati Zlaoui",{"name":375,"orcid":376},"Inès Gharbi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-2558-2134",{"name":378,"orcid":379},"Asma Souissi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8680-5875",{"name":381,"orcid":8},"Ghada Ferchichi",{"name":383,"orcid":384},"Rania Soula","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6086-9176",{"name":386,"orcid":387},"Boubaker Dhehibi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3854-6669",{"name":389,"orcid":8},"Mohamed Zied Dhraief",{"tldr":391,"method":392,"finding":393,"direction":394,"opportunity":395},"用FAO TAPE工具评估突尼斯西北小农橄榄农场生态农业转型程度。","FAO TAPE框架与CAET指数，调查60个农场比较四类种植系统。","多样化与综合系统CAET得分达52%，单作仅31%，且收入更高。","农业绿色发展与碳","可将TAPE与CAET指标数字化，构建小农生态转型监测与决策支持系统。","2026-10-22T11:20:15.716064Z",{"id":398,"title":399,"url":400,"summary":401,"summary_zh":8,"content":402,"source_name":403,"source_url":8,"published_at":190,"category":83,"cover_url":8,"hotness":12,"is_selected":13,"score":404,"score_detail":405,"sources":407,"tags":409,"primary_topic":414,"secondary_topics":415,"classification":416,"search_phrases":428,"slug":431,"view_count":432,"doi":8,"paper":433,"created_at":441},5537,"农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链：协同机制与制度逻辑","https:\u002F\u002Fkyy.nwafu.edu.cn\u002Fkjjz\u002Fxdkjjz\u002F557ffd662c8e4af98e46fbf90f35d91f.htm","西北农林科技大学阮俊虎教授团队联合德国哥廷根大学于晓华教授，以大荔县国家现代农业产业园等为典型案例，从交易成本理论出发围绕技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理与价值分配四个机制开展案例内分析与跨案例比较，揭示农业产业园作为中国特色制度平台促进小农户融入数字化供应链的深层逻辑。","近日，经济管理学院“数智农业运营管理团队”阮俊虎教授联合德国哥廷根大学于晓华教授在《中国农村经济》发表题为“农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链：协同机制与制度逻辑”的研究论文，通过多案例研究揭示农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的协同机制，并阐释机制形成与运行的制度逻辑。博士研究生刘晨欢为第一作者，阮俊虎教授为通讯作者，王月博士和于晓华教授为合作学者。\n\n数字技术正深刻重构农产品供应链格局，大型电商平台等供应链核心主体加速构建覆盖生产源头至消费终端的数字化供应链体系，该体系不仅体现为数字技术在生产、销售、物流等环节的应用，更强调不同环节与经营主体之间的系统协同与数据贯通，小农户亟须有效融入数字化供应链以应对市场竞争格局的深刻变化。然而，“大国小农”国情农情下，小农户经营规模较小、土地细碎化程度较高，难以独立对接数字化、规模化的现代供应链体系。促进小农户深度融入数字化供应链，进而实现小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接，成为农业现代化进程中值得关注的重要议题。农业产业园作为区域农业发展的综合性制度平台，兼具资源集聚、组织协同与制度保障三重优势，能够为地方政府及园区经营管理主体协同整合制度资源并协调多元主体关系提供平台支撑，但将资源集聚、组织协同和制度供给优势转化为小农户融入数字化供应链的现实能力，其内在机理尚未得到系统性揭示。\n\n本文立足“农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的内在机理”这一科学问题，从交易成本理论出发，以大荔县国家现代农业产业园等为典型案例，围绕技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理和价值分配四个机制开展案例内分析与跨案例比较分析，揭示不同园区作用机制的共性、差异及情境适配特征，并从制度层面阐释农业产业园作为中国特色制度平台，促进小农户融入数字化供应链的深层逻辑。研究旨在为农业经营呈现小规模、分散化特征的国家和地区促进小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接提供理论参考与实践借鉴。\n\n该研究得到国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国农产品供应链数字化转型的发展战略与实施路径研究”（23&ZD123）的资助。\n\n论文链接：\n\n[https:\u002F\u002Fzgncjj.ajcass.com\u002F?jumpnotice=201606270007#\u002FissueDetail?contentId=123722&year=2026&issue=10&title=%E5%BD%93%E6%9C%9F%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95](https:\u002F\u002Fzgncjj.ajcass.com\u002F?jumpnotice=201606270007#\u002FissueDetail?contentId=123722&year=2026&issue=10&title=%E5%BD%93%E6%9C%9F%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95)\n\n编辑：张晴 终审：刘玉峰","中国农村经济 2026-10-21",82,{"impact":194,"substance":259,"depth":194,"authority":273,"freshness":89,"relevant":20,"comment":406},"核心期刊论文，多案例揭示农业产业园促进小农户融入数字化供应链的协同机制与制度逻辑，理论新意足、政策参考价值高，值得进入每日精选。",[408],{"name":403,"url":400},[410,201,411,412,413],"数字乡村","制度逻辑","数字化供应链","农业产业园",{"code":31,"slug":32,"name":33,"path":34,"parent_code":35},[],{"status":38,"locked":13,"version":39,"method":40,"evidence":417},{"candidates":418,"agricultural_evidence":45},[419,423],{"code":31,"score":18,"supported":45,"title":420,"abstract":421,"tags":422},[201],[201],[201],{"code":424,"score":20,"supported":13,"title":425,"abstract":426,"tags":427},"I6",[],[],[410],[429,430],"农业产业园 小农户 数字化供应链","大荔县 国家现代农业产业园","农业产业园小农户数字化供应链-5537",7,{"doi":8,"openalex_id":8,"authors":434,"venue":8,"cited_by_count":117,"oa_url":8,"card":435,"direction":136,"ingested_from":440},[],{"tldr":436,"method":437,"finding":438,"direction":136,"opportunity":439},"以农业产业园为案例，揭示其促进小农户融入数字化供应链的机制与制度逻辑。","交易成本理论，大荔县等典型案例的案例内分析与跨案例比较。","技术赋能、组织整合、规则治理与价值分配四机制共同推动小农户融入数字化供应链。","可量化检验四机制对农户融入绩效的影响，并比较不同产业园模式的适用边界。","agent","2026-10-22T00:07:10.192700Z"]