[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-3822":3,"related-3822":98},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":28,"primary_topic":34,"secondary_topics":40,"classification":41,"search_phrases":77,"slug":80,"view_count":81,"doi":82,"paper":83,"created_at":97},3822,"Climate Value Bifurcation (CVB) Model: Methodology, Classification Protocol, and Quantification Framework","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23031418","The Climate Value Bifurcation (CVB) Model is an open methodology for valuing the climate outcomes of agroecological and climate-smart agriculture programmes led by smallholder farmers. Such programmes produce mitigation, adaptation and resilience outcomes at the same time, and reporting them together invites \"triple-win\" claims, inconsistent classification and double counting. The CVB Model separates these outcomes into three independent tracks: Mitigation (carbon value), Adaptation (farm margin expansion) and Resilience (probability-weighted income protected against defined climate shocks). A five-step protocol assigns each intervention a primary track based on its climate mechanism, not its financial magnitude, anchored where relevant to IPCC and Verra pathways. The document sets out valuation formulas for each track, a three-tier data hierarchy with status codes, a structured literature review method, emission factor and carbon price conventions, a cash-flow separability test that governs when values may be aggregated, confidence ratings, sensitivity ranges and reporting conventions. An Engagement Localisation Annex adapts the method to any Indian landscape, with a worked example from Patratu Block, Jharkhand. Outputs are pre-feasibility estimates, not verified carbon credits. Field validation sharpens them at diligence.","气候价值分叉（Climate Value Bifurcation, CVB）模型是一种开放方法论，用于评估小农户主导的农业生态项目和气候智慧型农业项目的气候成果。此类项目同时产生减缓、适应和韧性成果，将其合并报告容易引发“三赢”主张、分类不一致和重复计算。CVB模型将这些成果分为三个独立轨道：减缓（碳价值）、适应（农场利润扩张）和韧性（针对既定气候冲击的概率加权保护收入）。五步协议根据每项干预措施的气候机制而非其财务规模，将其归入主要轨道，并在相关处锚定IPCC和Verra路径。文件阐述了各轨道的估值公式、带状态码的三级数据层级、结构化文献综述方法、排放因子与碳价格惯例、控制价值何时可聚合的现金流可分离性检验、置信度评级、敏感性区间和报告惯例。参与本地化附录将该方法适配于印度任意景观，并附有贾坎德邦帕特拉图区块的实例。输出结果为预可行性估算，而非经核证的碳信用。实地验证可在尽职调查阶段对其加以完善。",null,"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","论文",25,false,78,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},16,22,18,13,9,1,"提出气候价值三分轨核算方法学并附印度案例，对农业碳汇与气候智慧型农业评估有参考价值，但属预可行性方法框架，非政策或产业级突破。",[25,26],{"name":10,"url":6},{"name":10,"url":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23031417",[29,30,31,32,33],"小农户","气候智慧型农业","农业生态","农业碳汇","方法学",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":45},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":46,"agricultural_evidence":49},[47,54,60,67,72],{"code":35,"score":48,"supported":49,"title":50,"abstract":51,"tags":53},7,true,[],[29,52],"smallholder",[29],{"code":55,"score":56,"supported":49,"title":57,"abstract":58,"tags":59},"H6",4,[],[31],[31],{"code":61,"score":62,"supported":49,"title":63,"abstract":64,"tags":66},"I1",3,[],[65],"smart agriculture",[],{"code":68,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":69,"abstract":70,"tags":71},"H4",[],[],[32],{"code":73,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":74,"abstract":75,"tags":76},"H7",[],[],[30],[78,79],"气候智慧型农业 农业生态 农业碳汇 小农户","气候智慧型农业 农业生态","气候智慧型农业农业生态农业碳汇小农户-3822",6,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23031418",{"doi":82,"openalex_id":84,"authors":85,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":6,"card":89,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7214714568",[86],{"name":87,"orcid":9},"Srajesh Gupta",0,{"tldr":90,"method":91,"finding":92,"direction":93,"opportunity":94},"提出气候价值分叉模型，将小农农业项目的气候成果分为减缓、适应、韧性三条独立轨道进行估值。","五步分类协议、三轨估值公式、三层数据层级与现金流可分性检验，以印度贾坎德邦为例。","按气候机制而非财务规模分配主轨道，可避免三重赢家声明、分类不一致和重复计算。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探索该模型在不同区域和作物系统的本地化验证，以及将其与数字平台结合实现自动化估值与监测。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-09-30T23:30:09.550801Z",{"total":81,"page":22,"page_size":81,"items":99},[100,167,237,304,386,446],{"id":101,"title":102,"url":103,"summary":104,"summary_zh":105,"content":9,"source_name":106,"source_url":103,"published_at":107,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":108,"is_selected":14,"score":109,"score_detail":110,"sources":115,"tags":117,"primary_topic":121,"secondary_topics":122,"classification":123,"search_phrases":141,"slug":144,"view_count":88,"doi":145,"paper":146,"created_at":166},5105,"Behavioral Readiness for Climate‐Smart Agriculture Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers in Southwest Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071","ABSTRACT Understanding the behavioral mechanisms underlying farmers' readiness to adopt climate‐smart agriculture (CSA) is important for informing climate adaptation efforts. This study examines CSA adoption readiness among 384 smallholder farmers in Kaffa zone, Southwest Ethiopia, using covariance‐based structural equation modeling. The study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior by incorporating technology perceptions, previous CSA experience, risk aversion, and institutional support. The result shows attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control (PBC), perceived ease of use, previous CSA adoption experience, and institutional support were positively associated with CSA adoption readiness, whereas perceived usefulness and risk aversion were not significant. Perceived ease of use showed the strongest association with adoption intention ( β = 0.377, p = 0.001). Institutional support was positively associated with PBC ( β = 0.243, p \u003C 0.001) and future intention ( β = 0.112, p = 0.030), explaining 5.9% of variance in PBC and 41.4% of the variance in adoption readiness. PBC showed a significant indirect association between institutional support and future intention ( β = 0.058, p = 0.013; 95% bootstrap CI: 0.015–0.102), alongside a remaining direct association. The significant indirect association through perceived behavioral control suggests that farmers’ perceptions of their ability to implement CSA may represent an important pathway linking institutional support with adoption intentions. The findings highlight the relevance of integrating institutional support with efforts to strengthen farmers' perceived capability to implement CSA and to enhance behavioural readiness for future adoption.","摘要 理解农户采用气候智慧型农业（CSA）意愿背后的行为机制，对于为气候适应工作提供依据具有重要意义。本研究采用基于协方差的结构方程模型，考察了埃塞俄比亚西南部卡法地区384户小农户的CSA采用意愿。研究在计划行为理论的基础上，纳入了技术感知、既往CSA经验、风险规避和制度支持。结果表明，态度、主观规范、感知行为控制（PBC）、感知易用性、既往CSA采用经验和制度支持与CSA采用意愿呈正相关，而感知有用性和风险规避则不显著。感知易用性与采用意愿的关联最强（β = 0.377，p = 0.001）。制度支持与PBC（β = 0.243，p \u003C 0.001）和未来意愿（β = 0.112，p = 0.030）呈正相关，分别解释了PBC方差的5.9%和采用意愿方差的41.4%。PBC在制度支持与未来意愿之间表现出显著的间接关联（β = 0.058，p = 0.013；95% bootstrap CI：0.015–0.102），同时仍存在直接关联。通过感知行为控制产生的显著间接关联表明，农户对自身实施CSA能力的感知可能是连接制度支持与采用意愿的重要路径。研究结果凸显了将制度支持与增强农户实施CSA的感知能力、提升未来采用行为意愿的努力相结合的重要性。","Climate Resilience and Sustainability","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",10,67,{"impact":111,"substance":112,"depth":113,"authority":20,"freshness":111,"relevant":22,"comment":114},8,21,17,"基于扩展计划行为理论对埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业采纳意愿的实证研究，方法规范、数据扎实，但属区域性学术成果，对国内农业信息化实践的直接参考价值有限。",[116],{"name":106,"url":103},[29,30,118,119,120],"埃塞俄比亚","采纳意愿","行为机制",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":124},{"candidates":125,"agricultural_evidence":49},[126,131,136],{"code":35,"score":127,"supported":49,"title":128,"abstract":129,"tags":130},15,[52],[29,52],[29],{"code":61,"score":132,"supported":49,"title":133,"abstract":134,"tags":135},11,[65],[65],[],{"code":73,"score":56,"supported":49,"title":137,"abstract":138,"tags":140},[],[139],"气候适应",[30],[142,143],"埃塞俄比亚 小农户 气候智慧型农业","气候智慧型农业 埃塞俄比亚 行为机制 采纳意愿","埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业-5105","10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071",{"doi":145,"openalex_id":147,"authors":148,"venue":106,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":159,"card":160,"direction":93,"ingested_from":96},"W7222349215",[149,152,154,157],{"name":150,"orcid":151},"Tesfaye Gafaro","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-7838-5264",{"name":153,"orcid":9},"Kassa Tarekegn Erekalo",{"name":155,"orcid":156},"Fresenbet Zeleke","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9792-9240",{"name":158,"orcid":9},"Sime Shiferaw","https:\u002F\u002Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com\u002Fdoi\u002Fpdfdirect\u002F10.1002\u002Fcli2.70071",{"tldr":161,"method":162,"finding":163,"direction":164,"opportunity":165},"基于扩展计划行为理论，分析埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业采纳意愿的行为机制。","对384户小农户问卷调查，用协方差结构方程模型分析。","感知易用性影响最强，制度支持通过感知行为控制间接提升采纳意愿。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探索数字服务与制度支持如何协同提升农户感知能力，促进气候智慧型农业采纳。","2026-10-16T23:31:01.112802Z",{"id":168,"title":169,"url":170,"summary":171,"summary_zh":172,"content":9,"source_name":173,"source_url":170,"published_at":174,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":108,"is_selected":14,"score":175,"score_detail":176,"sources":179,"tags":181,"primary_topic":185,"secondary_topics":186,"classification":187,"search_phrases":204,"slug":207,"view_count":22,"doi":208,"paper":209,"created_at":236},4807,"Climate Smart Agriculture Adaptation Resource Inequalities Among Smallholder Farmers in the Barind Tract of Bangladesh: The Role of Governance Inclusion and Institutional Access","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.47191\u002Fijsshr\u002Fv9-i10-18","Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly discussed as an approach for responding to climate risks while supporting agricultural productivity, resilience and sustainable resource use. However, access to the institutional and governance resources that enable farmers to adopt CSA may be uneven. This manuscript develops an empirical framework for examining adaptation-resource inequalities among smallholder farmers in the drought-prone Barind Tract of Bangladesh, with particular attention to governance inclusion and institutional access. The study is aligned with an approved doctoral research design focused on CSA adoption and its contribution to livelihood resilience in Rajshahi, Naogaon and Chapainawabganj. A mixed-methods design will combine a structured household survey, GPS-based spatial information, key-informant interviews, focused ethnographic fieldwork, policy and institutional document review, and relevant secondary data. The quantitative component will construct a Climate-Smart Agriculture Adoption Index (CSAAI) and examine socioeconomic, livelihood-capital, institutional, environmental and behavioural determinants using a Fractional Logit model. The institutional component will examine stakeholder roles, financing, extension, policy implementation and barriers through stakeholder mapping, a Power–Interest Matrix, a Barrier Severity Index and thematic analysis. Governance inclusion and institutional access will therefore be treated as mechanisms and explanatory conditions within the broader CSA adoption framework rather than as unsupported outcome measures. The manuscript does not report empirical results because the household survey and fieldwork are scheduled for the subsequent fieldwork phase of the doctoral project. This design provides a transparent basis for assessing whether differences in institutional access and governance inclusion are associated with unequal opportunities to adopt CSA and, subsequently, with livelihood resilience.","气候智慧型农业(CSA)日益被视为一种应对气候风险、同时支撑农业生产力、韧性与可持续资源利用的路径。然而，农民获取使其能够采用CSA的制度与治理资源的机会可能并不均衡。本文构建了一个实证框架，用于考察孟加拉国易受干旱影响的巴林德地区小农户之间的适应资源不平等，尤其关注治理包容性与制度可及性。本研究与一项已获批准的博士研究设计相一致，该设计聚焦于拉杰沙希、瑙冈和查帕伊纳瓦布甘杰地区CSA的采用及其对生计韧性的贡献。研究采用混合方法设计，将结构化农户调查、基于GPS的空间信息、关键信息人访谈、聚焦民族志田野工作、政策与制度文件审查以及相关二手数据相结合。定量部分将构建气候智慧型农业采用指数(CSAAI)，并使用分数对数模型考察社会经济、生计资本、制度、环境与行为等方面的决定因素。制度部分将通过利益相关者映射、权力—利益矩阵、障碍严重程度指数和主题分析，考察利益相关者角色、融资、推广、政策实施及障碍。因此，治理包容性与制度可及性将被视为更广泛的CSA采用框架中的机制与解释性条件，而非缺乏支撑的结果测量指标。本文不报告实证结果，因为农户调查与田野工作安排在博士项目后续的田野阶段进行。该设计为评估制度可及性与治理包容性方面的差异是否与采用CSA的不平等机会相关、并进而与生计韧性相关，提供了透明的依据。","International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",51,{"impact":111,"substance":108,"depth":177,"authority":177,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":178},12,"研究设计类论文，尚无实证结果，方法框架有一定参考价值但信息增量有限，暂不建议进入每日精选。",[180],{"name":173,"url":170},[29,30,182,183,184],"农业治理","孟加拉","机构可及性",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":188},{"candidates":189,"agricultural_evidence":49},[190,194,198],{"code":35,"score":127,"supported":49,"title":191,"abstract":192,"tags":193},[52],[29,52],[29],{"code":61,"score":132,"supported":49,"title":195,"abstract":196,"tags":197},[65],[65],[],{"code":73,"score":48,"supported":49,"title":199,"abstract":200,"tags":203},[],[201,202],"干旱","drought",[30],[205,206],"Barind Tract 小农户 气候智慧型农业","孟加拉 农业治理 机构可及性","BarindTract小农户气候智慧型农业-4807","10.47191\u002Fijsshr\u002Fv9-i10-18",{"doi":208,"openalex_id":210,"authors":211,"venue":173,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":230,"card":231,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7221555223",[212,214,216,219,222,224,226,228],{"name":213,"orcid":9},"Md Shahabuddin",{"name":215,"orcid":9},"Most Jesmin Ara",{"name":217,"orcid":218},"Banani Biswas","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-5773-1574",{"name":220,"orcid":221},"Rui Miguel Moutinho Sá","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6407-4541",{"name":223,"orcid":9},"Faizah Sadik Tapti",{"name":225,"orcid":9},"Kazi Afnan Maha",{"name":227,"orcid":9},"Sumia Akter Mim",{"name":229,"orcid":9},"Tanisha Tabassum Khan","https:\u002F\u002Fijsshr.in\u002Fv9i10\u002FDoc\u002F18.pdf",{"tldr":232,"method":233,"finding":234,"direction":164,"opportunity":235},"构建混合方法框架，研究孟加拉Barind Tract小农气候智慧农业采纳中的制度与治理资源不平等。","混合方法设计，含家庭调查、GPS空间数据、访谈、政策审查及分数Logit模型。","论文为研究设计，尚未报告实证结果，将治理包容与制度获取作为解释机制。","可延伸至数字治理工具如何提升小农制度获取公平性及气候适应韧性。","2026-10-13T23:30:10.181875Z",{"id":238,"title":239,"url":240,"summary":241,"summary_zh":242,"content":9,"source_name":243,"source_url":240,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":108,"is_selected":14,"score":244,"score_detail":245,"sources":247,"tags":249,"primary_topic":253,"secondary_topics":254,"classification":255,"search_phrases":280,"slug":283,"view_count":62,"doi":284,"paper":285,"created_at":303},3828,"Market Access and Adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3329\u002Fjbau.v24i3.93915","Market access is an important determinant influencing farmers’ adoption decisions by affecting prospective profitability, access to modern inputs, availability of information and extension services, and exposure to production and price risks. This systematic review is a synthesis of the evidence on the relationship between market access and CSA adoption in various agroecological settings. According to the PRISMA guidelines, five databases were used in the search: USDA Agricola, Semantic Scholar, DOAJ, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar from which a total of 55 peer-reviewed studies were retrieved from 2015 to 2024. The results suggest that improved market access, as represented by lower transaction costs, better market information, proximity to markets, and better integration into the value chain in general, is conducive to the adoption of CSA. On the contrary, limited access to credit facilities, infrastructure and institutional support, poor market linkages and geographical isolation still hinder adoption, especially among resource-limited smallholders. The existing evidence is disjointed, and there was little research that focused on the individual influence of the various dimensions of market access on CSA adoption. Focused investigations by addressing this gap, particularly in the coastal areas of developing countries, would provide clear insights for policy formulation to enhance CSA adoption through improved market access. J Bangladesh Agril Univ 24(3): 334–345, 2026","市场准入通过影响预期盈利能力、现代投入品的获取、信息与推广服务的可得性以及生产和价格风险的暴露程度，成为影响农户采纳决策的重要决定因素。本系统综述综合了不同农业生态背景下市场准入与气候智能型农业（CSA）采纳之间关系的证据。根据PRISMA指南，检索使用了五个数据库：USDA Agricola、Semantic Scholar、DOAJ、EBSCOhost和Google Scholar，共获取2015年至2024年间发表的55篇同行评审研究。结果表明，以较低交易成本、更好的市场信息、靠近市场以及总体上更好地融入价值链为代表的市场准入改善，有利于气候智能型农业的采纳。相反，信贷设施、基础设施和制度支持获取有限、市场联系薄弱以及地理隔离仍然阻碍采纳，尤其是在资源有限的小农户中。现有证据较为零散，鲜有研究关注市场准入各维度对气候智能型农业采纳的单独影响。针对这一空白开展聚焦性研究，尤其是在发展中国家沿海地区，将为政策制定提供明确见解，以通过改善市场准入促进气候智能型农业的采纳。《孟加拉国农业大学学报》24(3)：334–345，2026","Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University",62,{"impact":111,"substance":19,"depth":17,"authority":177,"freshness":111,"relevant":22,"comment":246},"基于PRISMA的系统综述，梳理市场准入与气候智慧型农业采纳关系，结论可靠但属学术综述，公共影响有限。",[248],{"name":243,"url":240},[29,30,250,251,252],"农业推广","技术采纳","市场准入",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":256},{"candidates":257,"agricultural_evidence":49},[258,262,266,270,276],{"code":61,"score":111,"supported":49,"title":259,"abstract":260,"tags":261},[65],[],[],{"code":35,"score":56,"supported":49,"title":263,"abstract":264,"tags":265},[],[29],[29],{"code":55,"score":62,"supported":49,"title":267,"abstract":268,"tags":269},[],[31],[],{"code":271,"score":272,"supported":14,"title":273,"abstract":274,"tags":275},"G1",2,[],[],[250,251],{"code":73,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":277,"abstract":278,"tags":279},[],[],[30],[281,282],"气候智慧型农业 市场准入","气候智慧型农业 农业推广 市场准入 技术采纳","气候智慧型农业市场准入-3828","10.3329\u002Fjbau.v24i3.93915",{"doi":284,"openalex_id":286,"authors":287,"venue":243,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":240,"card":298,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7214807272",[288,290,293,296],{"name":289,"orcid":9},"Mahmuda Khanom",{"name":291,"orcid":292},"Md Kamrul Hasan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0008-5365-6616",{"name":294,"orcid":295},"Md. Ektear Uddin","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8003-8134",{"name":297,"orcid":9},"Md Mamun-ur Rashid",{"tldr":299,"method":300,"finding":301,"direction":93,"opportunity":302},"系统综述市场准入与气候智慧型农业采纳的关系，发现市场准入改善促进采纳。","按PRISMA指南检索5个数据库，纳入2015-2024年55篇同行评审研究。","市场准入改善促进CSA采纳，但信贷、基础设施和制度支持不足仍阻碍小农户采纳。","可细分市场准入各维度对CSA采纳的独立影响，并聚焦发展中国家沿海地区开展实证研究。","2026-09-30T23:30:11.433120Z",{"id":305,"title":306,"url":307,"summary":308,"summary_zh":309,"content":9,"source_name":310,"source_url":307,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":244,"score_detail":311,"sources":313,"tags":318,"primary_topic":320,"secondary_topics":321,"classification":322,"search_phrases":355,"slug":358,"view_count":81,"doi":359,"paper":360,"created_at":385},3827,"Climate Experience and Climate-smart Agriculture Adoption among Smallholder Farmers in Southwestern Nigeria","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.9734\u002Fjaeri\u002F2026\u002Fv27i5817","Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is promoted to strengthen smallholder farming systems under climatic variability, yet adoption determinants remain context-specific, particularly where awareness is widespread. This study examined the association between farmers’ experience of changing weather conditions and reported CSA adoption among smallholder farmers in southwestern Nigeria, while accounting for selected socioeconomic and agricultural-information characteristics. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 190 farmers. Descriptive statistics characterised respondents, weather-change experience and CSA adoption. Because the adoption outcome was highly imbalanced, Firth-penalised logistic regression was used. CSA awareness was reported by 187 respondents (98.4%). Frequent experience of changing weather conditions was reported by 157 respondents (82.6%), and 174 of 188 respondents with valid responses (92.6%) reported at least occasional experience. Among 176 respondents with valid adoption responses, 168 (95.5%) reported using at least one CSA practice and eight (4.5%) reported non-adoption. The regression model, based on 173 complete observations, identified experience of changing weather conditions as the only statistically significant predictor of reported adoption (OR = 10.401, 95% CI: 3.118–34.694, p \u003C 0.001). Gender, education, farm size and extension information were not statistically significant. The findings indicate a positive association between direct climate experience and reported CSA adoption, but the cross-sectional design does not support causal inference. Climate-adaptation interventions may therefore benefit from linking farmers’ observed weather experiences with locally relevant CSA options and decision support.","气候智慧型农业(climate-smart agriculture, CSA)被推广用于在气候波动条件下强化小农耕作体系，但其采纳决定因素仍具有情境特异性，尤其是在认知已较为普遍的地区。本研究考察了尼日利亚西南部小农对天气条件变化的体验与所报告的CSA采纳之间的关联，同时控制了若干社会经济和农业信息特征。原始数据通过结构化问卷对190名农民进行调查获得。采用描述性统计刻画受访者特征、天气变化体验及CSA采纳情况。由于采纳结果高度不平衡，研究采用Firth惩罚逻辑回归。187名受访者(98.4%)报告知晓CSA。157名受访者(82.6%)报告经常经历天气条件变化，在188名有效应答者中有174人(92.6%)报告至少偶尔有此体验。在176名采纳情况有效应答者中，168人(95.5%)报告使用至少一项CSA实践，8人(4.5%)报告未采纳。基于173个完整观测值的回归模型显示，天气条件变化体验是所报告采纳的唯一具有统计学显著性的预测因子(OR = 10.401，95% CI：3.118–34.694，p \u003C 0.001)。性别、教育程度、农场规模和推广信息均不具有统计学显著性。研究结果表明，直接的气候体验与所报告的CSA采纳之间存在正相关，但横断面设计不支持因果推断。因此，气候适应干预措施或可从将农民观测到的天气体验与当地相关的CSA选项及决策支持相衔接中获益。","Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International",{"impact":111,"substance":19,"depth":127,"authority":177,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":312},"基于190户问卷的实证研究，方法规范但属区域性小样本，对国内三农信息化参考价值有限。",[314,315],{"name":310,"url":307},{"name":316,"url":317},"INRIA a CCSD electronic archive server","https:\u002F\u002Fhal.science\u002Fhal-05771551",[29,139,30,250,319],"尼日利亚",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":323},{"candidates":324,"agricultural_evidence":49},[325,329,333,340,345,351],{"code":35,"score":177,"supported":49,"title":326,"abstract":327,"tags":328},[52],[52],[29],{"code":61,"score":132,"supported":49,"title":330,"abstract":331,"tags":332},[65],[65],[],{"code":334,"score":81,"supported":49,"title":335,"abstract":336,"tags":339},"I7",[],[337,338],"因果推断","causal inference",[],{"code":73,"score":341,"supported":49,"title":342,"abstract":343,"tags":344},5,[],[139],[30,139],{"code":346,"score":62,"supported":49,"title":347,"abstract":348,"tags":350},"I2",[],[349],"decision support",[],{"code":271,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":352,"abstract":353,"tags":354},[],[],[250],[356,357],"尼日利亚 小农户 气候智慧型农业","西南尼日利亚 农户 气候适应","尼日利亚小农户气候智慧型农业-3827","10.9734\u002Fjaeri\u002F2026\u002Fv27i5817",{"doi":359,"openalex_id":361,"authors":362,"venue":310,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":307,"card":380,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7214752532",[363,366,368,370,372,374,376,378],{"name":364,"orcid":365},"Folasade Jokotade Odekunle","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8768-1045",{"name":367,"orcid":9},"Jechoniah AGABI",{"name":369,"orcid":9},"Idris O. JINADU",{"name":371,"orcid":9},"Gabriel O. Adebayo",{"name":373,"orcid":9},"Adedayo S. Adediran",{"name":375,"orcid":9},"Akeem Adewole",{"name":377,"orcid":9},"Segun S. Adelabu",{"name":379,"orcid":9},"Adedotun A. Adetunji",{"tldr":381,"method":382,"finding":383,"direction":164,"opportunity":384},"研究尼日利亚西南小农户气候变化经历与气候智慧型农业采纳的关联。","对190户问卷调查，因采纳结果高度不平衡，采用Firth惩罚逻辑回归。","气候变化经历是采纳的唯一显著预测因子（OR=10.4），但横断面设计不支持因果推断。","可结合农户天气感知与本地化CSA决策支持工具，开展纵向或干预研究验证因果并提升采纳。","2026-09-30T23:30:09.908940Z",{"id":387,"title":388,"url":389,"summary":390,"summary_zh":391,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":389,"published_at":392,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":244,"score_detail":393,"sources":396,"tags":400,"primary_topic":402,"secondary_topics":403,"classification":404,"search_phrases":424,"slug":426,"view_count":22,"doi":427,"paper":428,"created_at":445},2931,"UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTRAINTS OF CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE AMONG SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832901","Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) has gained increasing attention as an approach for improving agricultural productivity and strengthening the resilience of farming systems to climate variability and change. However, the willingness of farmers to embrace CSA does not necessarily translate into implementation. This study examined the factors influencing the willingness of 190 smallholder farmers in Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State, southwestern Nigeria, to implement CSA, the principal constraints to implementation, sources of agricultural information, institutional support and farmers' preferred strategies for strengthening implementation among 190 smallholder farmers in Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State, southwestern Nigeria. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analysed mainly with frequencies and percentages, while ordered response-scale variables were summarised with appropriate scale-based measures. Cost of implementation was the most frequently identified factor influencing willingness (32.7%), followed by knowledge and information (28.4%) and resources (22.6%). Cost was also the dominant implementation constraint (54.7%), followed by uncertainty about the effectiveness of CSA practices (25.8%) and difficulty learning new techniques (19.5%). Most respondents (94.7%) reported receiving some form of agricultural or institutional support, although financial assistance accounted for only 13.7% of the reported support. Government extension officers were the principal source of agricultural information (55.3%), while government incentives or subsidies were the most preferred strategy for strengthening implementation (50.5%). Demonstration farms and farmer field schools were the most preferred learning approaches (32.6% each). The findings indicate that the central challenge is not simply awareness or willingness but farmers' capacity to convert willingness into practical action. Therefore, strengthening CSA implementation requires coordinated financial, technical, informational, and institutional support rather than awareness creation alone.","气候智慧型农业(CSA)作为提高农业生产力和增强农业系统对气候变率与气候变化适应力的方法，日益受到关注。然而，农民接受气候智慧型农业的意愿并不必然转化为实际实施。本研究考察了尼日利亚西南部奥约州阿基涅莱地方政府区190户小农户实施气候智慧型农业意愿的影响因素、实施的主要制约因素、农业信息来源、制度支持以及农民偏好用于加强实施的策略。数据通过结构化问卷收集，主要以频数和百分比进行分析，有序响应量表变量则采用适当的量表测量指标进行汇总。实施成本是影响意愿最常被提及的因素(32.7%)，其次是知识和信息(28.4%)以及资源(22.6%)。成本也是主要的实施制约因素(54.7%)，其次是对气候智慧型农业实践有效性的不确定性(25.8%)和学习新技术的困难(19.5%)。大多数受访者(94.7%)报告获得了某种形式的农业或制度支持，尽管财政援助仅占所报告支持的13.7%。政府推广人员是农业信息的主要来源(55.3%)，而政府激励或补贴是加强实施最受偏好的策略(50.5%)。示范农场和农民田间学校是最受偏好的学习方式(各占32.6%)。研究结果表明，核心挑战不仅仅是意识或意愿问题，而是农民将意愿转化为实际行动的能力。因此，加强气候智慧型农业的实施需要协调的财政、技术、信息和制度支持，而非仅仅开展意识宣传。","2026-09-18T00:00:00Z",{"impact":111,"substance":19,"depth":394,"authority":177,"freshness":108,"relevant":22,"comment":395},14,"基于190户小农户问卷的实证研究，揭示气候智慧型农业落地瓶颈在于成本与能力而非意愿，对农业推广信息化有参考价值，但属区域性案例、影响层级有限。",[397,398],{"name":10,"url":389},{"name":10,"url":399},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832902",[29,30,250,319,401],"农业信息获取",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":405},{"candidates":406,"agricultural_evidence":49},[407,411,415,420],{"code":35,"score":127,"supported":49,"title":408,"abstract":409,"tags":410},[52],[29,52],[29],{"code":61,"score":132,"supported":49,"title":412,"abstract":413,"tags":414},[65],[65],[],{"code":73,"score":56,"supported":49,"title":416,"abstract":417,"tags":419},[],[418],"气候变化",[30],{"code":271,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":421,"abstract":422,"tags":423},[],[],[250],[356,425],"Oyo State 农业推广 信息","尼日利亚小农户气候智慧型农业-2931","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.22832901",{"doi":427,"openalex_id":429,"authors":430,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":389,"card":440,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7213579850",[431,433,434,435,437,438,439],{"name":432,"orcid":9},"Folasade J. Odekunle",{"name":367,"orcid":9},{"name":379,"orcid":9},{"name":436,"orcid":9},"Omotunde M. KILASHO",{"name":369,"orcid":9},{"name":371,"orcid":9},{"name":373,"orcid":9},{"tldr":441,"method":442,"finding":443,"direction":164,"opportunity":444},"研究尼日利亚小农户实施气候智慧农业的意愿、制约因素与支持需求。","对190户小农户问卷调查，用频数和百分比等描述性统计分析。","成本是首要制约，核心挑战在于农户将意愿转化为行动的能力不足。","可探索数字信息服务和金融支持如何协同提升小农户CSA实施能力。","2026-09-19T23:30:11.397222Z",{"id":447,"title":448,"url":449,"summary":450,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":451,"source_url":449,"published_at":392,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":108,"is_selected":14,"score":452,"score_detail":453,"sources":455,"tags":457,"primary_topic":459,"secondary_topics":460,"classification":461,"search_phrases":481,"slug":483,"view_count":56,"doi":484,"paper":485,"created_at":490},2924,"Climate-Smart Agriculture Package Combinations and Household Food and Nutrition Security among Smallholder Farmers in Southwestern Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11073051\u002Fv1","Climate-Smart Agriculture Package Combinations and Household Food and Nutrition Security among Smallholder Farmers in Southwestern Ethiopia。Research Square","Research Square",56,{"impact":111,"substance":19,"depth":127,"authority":81,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":454},"研究主题契合气候智慧型农业与小农户粮食安全，但属区域性论文且来源为预印本平台，公共影响与权威性有限，暂不建议进入每日精选。",[456],{"name":451,"url":449},[458,29,30,118],"粮食安全",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":462},{"candidates":463,"agricultural_evidence":49},[464,468,472,477],{"code":35,"score":177,"supported":49,"title":465,"abstract":466,"tags":467},[52],[52],[29],{"code":61,"score":132,"supported":49,"title":469,"abstract":470,"tags":471},[65],[65],[],{"code":473,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":474,"abstract":475,"tags":476},"A8",[],[],[458],{"code":73,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":478,"abstract":479,"tags":480},[],[],[30],[142,482],"气候智慧型农业 埃塞俄比亚 粮食安全 小农户","埃塞俄比亚小农户气候智慧型农业-2924","10.21203\u002Frs.3.rs-11073051\u002Fv1",{"doi":484,"openalex_id":486,"authors":487,"venue":451,"cited_by_count":88,"oa_url":449,"card":9,"direction":95,"ingested_from":96},"W7213535845",[488],{"name":489,"orcid":151},"Tesfaye Gafaro Ololo","2026-09-19T23:30:10.838601Z"]