[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4034":3,"related-4034":99},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":28,"primary_topic":34,"secondary_topics":40,"classification":41,"search_phrases":79,"slug":82,"view_count":83,"doi":84,"paper":85,"created_at":98},4034,"D1.5 – Policy recommendations","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858","PrAEctiCe presents policy recommendations for advancing agroecology and climate-resilient food systems in East Africa. It highlights evidence generated through stakeholder mapping, agroecological practice profiling, co-creation, indicator framework development, digital decision-support tools, and Living Labs in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The recommendations focus on strengthening agroecology policies, integrated agriculture–aquaculture, renewable energy, circular nutrient systems, digital agriculture, data governance, inclusive financing, youth and gender participation, and justicesensitive transitions. The document also describes dissemination through national, continental and AU–EU policy events, aligning the recommendations with CAADP, Agenda 2063, the EU Green Deal and Farm to Fork Strategy.","PrAEctiCe提出了在东非推进农业生态学和气候韧性食物系统的政策建议。该文件重点介绍了通过利益相关者映射、农业生态实践画像、共同创造、指标框架开发、数字决策支持工具以及在肯尼亚、乌干达和坦桑尼亚开展的“生活实验室”（Living Labs）所生成的证据。建议聚焦于加强农业生态政策、农业—水产养殖一体化、可再生能源、循环养分系统、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资、青年与性别参与，以及具有正义敏感性的转型。文件还介绍了通过国家、非洲大陆及非盟—欧盟政策活动进行传播的情况，并将这些建议与CAADP、2063年议程、欧盟绿色协议和“从农场到餐桌”战略相衔接。",null,"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","论文",25,false,80,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},22,20,17,13,8,1,"欧盟项目面向东非的生态农业与数字农业政策建议，含指标框架与决策支持工具，对农业信息化政策研究有参考价值。",[25,26],{"name":10,"url":6},{"name":10,"url":27},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082859",[29,30,31,32,33],"数字农业","农业政策","数据治理","生态农业","东非农业",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},"H6","biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":45},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":46,"agricultural_evidence":50},[47,55,63,69,74],{"code":48,"score":49,"supported":50,"title":51,"abstract":52,"tags":54},"I1",7,true,[],[29,53],"digital agriculture",[29],{"code":56,"score":57,"supported":50,"title":58,"abstract":59,"tags":62},"D",6,[],[60,61],"水产","aquaculture",[],{"code":35,"score":57,"supported":50,"title":64,"abstract":65,"tags":68},[],[66,67],"农业生态","agroecology",[],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":71,"abstract":72,"tags":73},"H8",[],[],[32],{"code":75,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":76,"abstract":77,"tags":78},"I6",[],[],[31],[80,81],"PrAEctiCe 政策建议","东非 生态农业 气候韧性","PrAEctiCe政策建议-4034",2,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23082858",{"doi":84,"openalex_id":86,"authors":87,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":6,"card":91,"direction":95,"ingested_from":97},"W7215062811",[88],{"name":89,"orcid":9},"Emmanuel Okalany",0,{"tldr":92,"method":93,"finding":94,"direction":95,"opportunity":96},"为东非农业生态与气候韧性食物系统提出政策建议，基于多国实证与数字工具。","利益相关者映射、共同创造、指标框架、数字决策支持与生活实验室。","建议涵盖农业生态政策、数字农业、数据治理、包容性融资及青年性别参与。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可研究数字决策工具在东非小农场景的落地效果与数据治理机制。","openalex","2026-10-02T23:30:30.857763Z",{"total":57,"page":22,"page_size":57,"items":100},[101,173,283,339,412,489],{"id":102,"title":103,"url":104,"summary":105,"summary_zh":106,"content":9,"source_name":107,"source_url":104,"published_at":108,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":109,"is_selected":14,"score":110,"score_detail":111,"sources":115,"tags":117,"primary_topic":122,"secondary_topics":123,"classification":124,"search_phrases":146,"slug":149,"view_count":90,"doi":150,"paper":151,"created_at":172},4980,"Creating common ground: integrating transformative agroecology and extension research in undergraduate education","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768","This paper examines the Agroecology Extension (AX) summer Research Fellowship at the University of Vermont, a 5-year USDA-funded undergraduate program that intentionally integrated extension research with agroecology education within a land-grant university context. Drawing on predominantly qualitative evaluation of five cohorts (2021–2025, n = 47), we identify enabling and constraining pedagogical factors for creating common ground between two domains that remain institutionally separated at most land-grant universities. The study contributes to the emerging signature pedagogy for sustainable food systems education by documenting how three interconnected pedagogical dynamics—integrating political agroecology with extension, centering equity as a sustained commitment, and supporting participatory knowledge co-creation with students—shaped program design and evolution across 5 years. Findings demonstrate that transformative education at the intersection of agroecology and extension requires explicit engagement with the political dimensions of agroecology and extension history, relational infrastructure for equity work, and deliberate structures for co-learning. This case study offers practical pedagogical insights for land-grant universities seeking to develop sustainable programs that bridge agroecology and extension while preparing graduates to address complex agricultural and food systems challenges.","本文考察了佛蒙特大学的农业生态学推广（Agroecology Extension, AX）暑期研究奖学金项目。该项目由美国农业部资助，为期五年，是一项本科生项目，在赠地大学（land-grant university）语境下有意将推广研究与农业生态学教育相结合。基于对五届学员（2021—2025年，n = 47）的以定性为主的评估，我们识别了在大多数赠地大学中仍处于制度性分离状态的两个领域之间建立共同基础（common ground）的促进性与制约性教学因素。本研究通过记录三种相互关联的教学动态——将政治农业生态学与推广相结合、将公平作为持续承诺加以中心化、以及支持与学生共同进行参与式知识共创——如何在五年间塑造了项目设计与演变，为可持续食物系统教育的新兴标志性教学法（signature pedagogy）作出了贡献。研究结果表明，在农业生态学与推广的交汇处开展变革性教育，需要明确介入农业生态学的政治维度与推广历史、建立支持公平工作的关系性基础设施，以及为共同学习设计有意的制度结构。本案例研究为那些寻求开发可持续项目、以弥合农业生态学与推广之间鸿沟、同时培养毕业生应对复杂农业与食物系统挑战的赠地大学提供了实践性教学启示。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-14T00:00:00Z",10,65,{"impact":21,"substance":112,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":113,"relevant":22,"comment":114},18,9,"美国赠地大学农业生态学与推广教育融合的五年期本科项目案例研究，方法扎实但属境外教育实践，对国内三农信息化仅有间接参考价值。",[116],{"name":107,"url":104},[118,119,120,32,121],"可持续食物系统","农业教育","农业推广","参与式研究",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":125},{"candidates":126,"agricultural_evidence":50},[127,132,137,142],{"code":35,"score":128,"supported":50,"title":129,"abstract":130,"tags":131},14,[67],[66,67],[],{"code":133,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":134,"abstract":135,"tags":136},"E2",[],[],[118],{"code":138,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":139,"abstract":140,"tags":141},"G1",[],[],[120],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":143,"abstract":144,"tags":145},[],[],[32],[147,148],"佛蒙特大学 农业推广 生态农业","可持续食物系统 参与式研究 农业推广 农业教育","佛蒙特大学农业推广生态农业-4980","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768",{"doi":150,"openalex_id":152,"authors":153,"venue":107,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":165,"card":166,"direction":170,"ingested_from":97},"W7221806502",[154,157,160,162],{"name":155,"orcid":156},"Karen L. Nordstrom","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-4326-3854",{"name":158,"orcid":159},"Victor M. Izzo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0254-1105",{"name":161,"orcid":9},"Emily Hoyler",{"name":163,"orcid":164},"V. Ernesto Méndez","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7394-5679","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1882768\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":167,"method":168,"finding":169,"direction":170,"opportunity":171},"评估佛蒙特大学五年农业生态推广暑期研究奖学金，探索如何整合农业生态学与推广教育。","对2021-2025年五届47名学员进行定性评估，分析教学促进与制约因素。","需明确参与农业生态政治维度、建立公平关系基础设施和共同学习结构。","其他","可研究此类跨学科体验式教育对毕业生推广实践与农业系统转型的长期影响。","2026-10-15T23:30:06.661415Z",{"id":174,"title":175,"url":176,"summary":177,"summary_zh":178,"content":9,"source_name":179,"source_url":176,"published_at":180,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":109,"is_selected":14,"score":181,"score_detail":182,"sources":185,"tags":187,"primary_topic":192,"secondary_topics":198,"classification":206,"search_phrases":253,"slug":256,"view_count":90,"doi":257,"paper":258,"created_at":282},4570,"Agroecological practices, perceived benefits, and determinants of adoption in the Yayu Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve, Southwest Ethiopia","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4","Agroecology offers a promising pathway for reconciling forest conservation with rural livelihoods in biodiversity-rich tropical landscapes, yet empirical evidence on the breadth, intensity, and determinants of adoption remains limited, particularly in UNESCO biosphere reserves. This study investigates agroecological practices, perceived contributions, and determinants of adoption in the Yayu Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve (YCFBR), Southwest Ethiopia. A cross-sectional concurrent mixed-methods design was employed, combining 293 randomly selected households, complemented by key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations. Binary logistic regression identified determinants of adoption (extensive margin), while ordinal logistic regression examined adoption intensity using the Agroecological Adoption Index (AAI) (intensive margin). Number of Practices Adopted (NPA), Weighted Adoption Intensity (WAI), and Duration of Adoption (DUR) provided complementary insights into adoption breadth, intensity, and persistence. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically to contextualize quantitative findings. Results showed that 72% of households adopted at least one agroecological practice, including coffee agroforestry, homegarden agroforestry, soil and water conservation, climate-smart agriculture, intercropping, crop rotation, mixed tree planting, afforestation and reforestation, organic soil fertility management, and biological pest and disease management. Adoption intensity varied: 34.6% low, 41.2% moderate, and 24.2% high. Practices were perceived to improve soil fertility, biodiversity conservation, climate resilience, forest management, and livelihood diversification while reducing pressure on natural forests and strengthening ecological connectivity and adaptive capacity. Sex, education, farm size, extension services, training, credit access, and cooperative membership significantly determined adoption and intensity, whereas age, household size, farming experience, and distance to forest were non-significant. Agroecology provides a multifunctional, context-specific pathway for advancing sustainable forest management, biodiversity conservation, and livelihood resilience. Strengthening agroecology-oriented extension, gender-responsive training, access to finance, indigenous knowledge integration, and policy mainstreaming are essential for long-term environmental sustainability and community resilience in the YCFBR and comparable forest-dependent landscapes.","农业生态学为在生物多样性丰富的热带景观中协调森林保护与农村生计提供了一条有前景的路径，但关于其采用广度、强度及决定因素的实证证据仍然有限，尤其是在联合国教科文组织生物圈保护区中。本研究调查了埃塞俄比亚西南部亚尤咖啡森林生物圈保护区（YCFBR）的农业生态实践、感知贡献及采用决定因素。研究采用横断面同步混合方法设计，结合293户随机选取的家庭，并辅以关键知情人访谈、焦点小组讨论和实地观察。二元逻辑回归识别了采用的决定因素（外延边际），而有序逻辑回归则使用农业生态采用指数（AAI）考察了采用强度（内涵边际）。采用实践数量（NPA）、加权采用强度（WAI）和采用持续时间（DUR）为采用广度、强度和持续性提供了补充性见解。定性数据采用主题分析法，以对定量发现进行情境化解释。结果表明，72%的家庭至少采用了一项农业生态实践，包括咖啡农林复合、家庭园圃农林复合、水土保持、气候智能型农业、间作、轮作、混合植树、植树造林和再造林、有机土壤肥力管理以及生物病虫害管理。采用强度存在差异：低度34.6%、中度41.2%、高度24.2%。受访者认为这些实践改善了土壤肥力、生物多样性保护、气候韧性、森林管理和生计多样化，同时减轻了对天然森林的压力，并增强了生态连通性和适应能力。性别、教育程度、农场规模、推广服务、培训、信贷获取和合作社成员资格显著决定了采用及采用强度，而年龄、家庭规模、耕作经验和距森林距离则不显著。农业生态学为推进可持续森林管理、生物多样性保护和生计韧性提供了一条多功能、因地制宜的路径。加强面向农业生态学的推广、性别响应型培训、融资渠道、本土知识整合和政策主流化，对于YCFBR及类似依赖森林的地区实现长期环境可持续性和社区韧性至关重要。","Discover Environment","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",73,{"impact":183,"substance":17,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":113,"relevant":22,"comment":184},12,"基于293户调查的实证研究，数据扎实、结论具体，对热带林区农业生态化与咖啡产业可持续发展有参考价值，但属区域性案例研究，公共影响层级有限。",[186],{"name":179,"url":176},[188,189,32,190,191],"可持续生计","咖啡产业","农林复合经营","生物多样性保护",{"code":193,"slug":194,"name":195,"path":196,"parent_code":197},"B3","tea-coffee","茶叶与咖啡","\u002Ftopic\u002Fhorticulture\u002Ftea-coffee","B",[199,205],{"code":200,"slug":201,"name":202,"path":203,"parent_code":204},"A7","forage-cropping","饲草与耕作制度","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fforage-cropping","A",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":207},{"candidates":208,"agricultural_evidence":50},[209,216,224,230,237,244,249],{"code":193,"score":210,"supported":50,"title":211,"abstract":213,"tags":215},15,[212],"coffee",[214,212],"咖啡",[189],{"code":200,"score":113,"supported":50,"title":217,"abstract":218,"tags":223},[],[219,220,221,222],"轮作","间作","crop rotation","intercropping",[],{"code":35,"score":113,"supported":50,"title":225,"abstract":226,"tags":229},[],[227,66,228,36,67],"生物多样性","水土保持",[],{"code":231,"score":57,"supported":50,"title":232,"abstract":233,"tags":236},"H2",[],[234,235],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":238,"score":239,"supported":50,"title":240,"abstract":241,"tags":243},"H7",3,[],[242],"climate resilience",[],{"code":48,"score":239,"supported":50,"title":245,"abstract":246,"tags":248},[],[247],"smart agriculture",[],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":250,"abstract":251,"tags":252},[],[],[32],[254,255],"埃塞俄比亚 亚尤咖啡林 生物圈保护区","农林复合经营 采纳影响因素","埃塞俄比亚亚尤咖啡林生物圈保护区-4570","10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4",{"doi":257,"openalex_id":259,"authors":260,"venue":179,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":274,"card":275,"direction":281,"ingested_from":97},"W7221057925",[261,264,267,270,272],{"name":262,"orcid":263},"Alemayehu Abera","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6225-9304",{"name":265,"orcid":266},"Samuel Taye","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9662-3939",{"name":268,"orcid":269},"Adanech Asfaw","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-2586-0559",{"name":271,"orcid":9},"Chaluma Kicha",{"name":273,"orcid":9},"Endashew Mogessie","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Fcontent\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01113-4.pdf",{"tldr":276,"method":277,"finding":278,"direction":279,"opportunity":280},"研究埃塞俄比亚亚尤咖啡森林生物圈保护区农户采用农业生态实践的程度、感知效益及影响因素。","混合方法：293户问卷+访谈+焦点小组，二元与有序logistic回归分析采用广","72%农户至少采用一项实践，采用强度分低中高；性别、教育、推广、信贷等显著影响采用。","农业绿色发展与碳","可延伸研究农业生态实践采用对森林保护与生计韧性的长期因果效应及数字化推广干预。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-10-10T23:30:11.538537Z",{"id":284,"title":285,"url":286,"summary":287,"summary_zh":288,"content":9,"source_name":107,"source_url":286,"published_at":289,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":109,"is_selected":14,"score":290,"score_detail":291,"sources":293,"tags":295,"primary_topic":300,"secondary_topics":301,"classification":302,"search_phrases":319,"slug":322,"view_count":90,"doi":323,"paper":324,"created_at":338},4411,"Agroecology in West Africa: the pathway towards a sustainable transition of agri-food systems? A review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044","This article reviews the state of the art on the potential of agroecology to contribute to the sustainable transformation of agrifood systems in West Africa. Data were retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and grey literature. The 484 publications reviewed span the last 25 years, focusing primarily on West Africa, while selected studies from other regions were included where relevant to the analysis. Over the past two decades, agroecology has gained a growing interest in different scientific fields, and is increasingly discussed as an alternative approach to conventional agricultural models. The reviewed evidence suggests that several agroecological practices are rooted in local knowledge and may contribute to addressing some of the environmental and food-systems challenges facing the region. However, the nature and the magnitude of these contributions remain context-dependent and unevenly documented across the region. Existing studies point to potential benefits for agricultural resilience, food security and nutrition, biodiversity, socioeconomic viability, human values, but the available evidence remains insufficient to highlight the potential of agroecology for food systems transformation. Scaling up agroecology is further constrained by interrelated challenges, including limited training and advisory services, restricted access to inputs and markets, and policy support. In many regions, research on agroecology has covered only a limited range of topics, highlighting the need for more context-specific and multidimensional science. Future studies should investigate the conditions under which agroecological transitions are most likely to succeed, including the interactions among policy support, training, resource access, markets, and economic incentives. Greater attention is also needed to its socioeconomic viability and to the development of locally adapted advisory and support services.","本文综述了农业生态学在西非农食系统可持续转型中潜在贡献的研究现状。数据检索自Scopus、PubMed、Google Scholar及灰色文献。所综述的484篇出版物时间跨度涵盖过去25年，主要聚焦西非，同时酌情纳入了其他区域与分析相关的精选研究。过去二十年间，农业生态学在不同科学领域日益受到关注，并越来越多地作为替代常规农业模式的方案被讨论。综述证据表明，若干农业生态实践根植于地方知识，可能有助于应对该地区面临的部分环境与食物系统挑战。然而，这些贡献的性质与程度仍取决于具体情境，且在该地区的记录并不均衡。现有研究指出了其在农业韧性、粮食安全与营养、生物多样性、社会经济可行性、人类价值等方面的潜在益处，但现有证据仍不足以凸显农业生态学对食物系统转型的潜力。农业生态学的推广还受到相互关联的制约因素限制，包括培训与推广服务有限、投入品与市场准入受限以及政策支持不足。在许多地区，农业生态学研究仅涉及有限的主题范围，凸显了开展更具情境针对性和多维度的科学研究的必要性。未来研究应探讨农业生态转型最有可能成功的条件，包括政策支持、培训、资源获取、市场与经济激励之间的相互作用。还需更多关注其社会经济可行性以及因地制宜的推广与支持服务的发展。","2026-10-07T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":183,"substance":18,"depth":112,"authority":128,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":292},"基于484篇文献的系统综述，指出生态农业在西非的潜力与证据不足，属细分领域学术进展，公共影响有限。",[294],{"name":107,"url":286},[296,297,32,298,299],"粮食安全","农业转型","西非农业","农食系统",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":303},{"candidates":304,"agricultural_evidence":50},[305,309,315],{"code":35,"score":19,"supported":50,"title":306,"abstract":307,"tags":308},[67],[227,66,36,67],[],{"code":310,"score":49,"supported":50,"title":311,"abstract":312,"tags":314},"A8",[],[296,313],"food security",[296],{"code":70,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":316,"abstract":317,"tags":318},[],[],[32],[320,321],"西非 生态农业 农食系统","农业转型 农食系统 生态农业 粮食安全","西非生态农业农食系统-4411","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044",{"doi":323,"openalex_id":325,"authors":326,"venue":107,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":332,"card":333,"direction":279,"ingested_from":97},"W7220841560",[327,329],{"name":328,"orcid":9},"Bernadin Djossou",{"name":330,"orcid":331},"Pascal Gbénou","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-8498-7390","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1893044\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":334,"method":335,"finding":336,"direction":279,"opportunity":337},"综述西非农业生态学25年研究，评估其推动农食系统可持续转型的潜力与局限。","检索Scopus等数据库及灰色文献，系统综述484篇相关论文。","农业生态实践有助应对环境与粮食挑战，但证据不足且受培训、市场与政策制约。","可研究政策、培训、市场与激励的交互作用，明确农业生态转型成功的具体条件。","2026-10-08T23:30:07.324467Z",{"id":340,"title":341,"url":342,"summary":343,"summary_zh":344,"content":9,"source_name":345,"source_url":342,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":346,"is_selected":14,"score":347,"score_detail":348,"sources":351,"tags":357,"primary_topic":362,"secondary_topics":363,"classification":364,"search_phrases":396,"slug":399,"view_count":22,"doi":400,"paper":401,"created_at":411},4008,"Agroecology as a pathway for scaling climate-smart agriculture and strengthening food system resilience in Benin","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087822","Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) is widely promoted to address food insecurity, climate variability, and environmental degradation in sub-Saharan Africa. However, evidence on scalable and context-specific pathways for CSA adoption in smallholder systems remains limited, particularly regarding agroecological transitions. This study assesses agroecology as a pathway for scaling CSA and strengthening food system resilience in three communes of Benin (Dassa-Zoumè, Bohicon and Parakou), examining contributions to the three CSA pillars of adaptation, mitigation and productivity. A mixed-methods design combined a structured household survey (n = 210), semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 32), and secondary agricultural and climate data (2010-2024). A composite resilience index was constructed using principal component analysis (PCA) to compare agroecological and conventional systems. Results show that agroecological farms achieve a 23% higher soil fertility index, a 31% higher resilience capacity, and a 17% reduction in yield variability under climate stress, relative to conventional systems. Crop diversification is 28% higher among agroecological producers, while dependence on synthetic inputs declines by up to 40%, improving system stability and adaptive capacity. Despite these benefits, scaling remains constrained by limited access to climate information services (reported by 35% of respondents), weak extension coverage (30%), and low access to climate finance (20%). The study concludes that agroecology provides a robust, evidence-based pathway for scaling CSA in Benin, and that strengthening digital climate services, extension systems and inclusive climate finance is critical to accelerate resilient and sustainable agricultural transformation in West Africa.","气候智慧型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）被广泛推广以应对撒哈拉以南非洲的粮食不安全、气候变异和环境退化问题。然而，关于小农系统中可规模化且因地制宜的CSA采纳路径的证据仍然有限，尤其是在农业生态转型方面。本研究评估了农业生态学作为贝宁三个市镇（Dassa-Zoumè、Bohicon和Parakou）推广CSA和增强粮食系统韧性的路径，考察其对CSA三大支柱——适应、减缓和生产力——的贡献。研究采用混合方法设计，结合了结构化农户调查（n = 210）、关键信息人半结构化访谈（n = 32）以及二手农业和气候数据（2010—2024年）。通过主成分分析（PCA）构建了综合韧性指数，以比较农业生态体系与常规体系。结果表明，相较于常规体系，农业生态农场实现了更高的土壤肥力指数（提高23%）、更强的韧性能力（提高31%），并在气候胁迫下将产量变异性降低了17%。农业生态生产者的作物多样化程度高出28%，而对合成投入品的依赖下降了多达40%，从而提升了系统稳定性和适应能力。尽管有这些益处，规模化推广仍受到气候信息服务获取有限（35%的受访者报告）、推广覆盖薄弱（30%）以及气候融资获取不足（20%）的制约。研究结论认为，农业生态学为在贝宁推广CSA提供了一条稳健的、基于证据的路径，而加强数字气候服务、推广体系和包容性气候融资对于加速西非韧性和可持续农业转型至关重要。","Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Journal",40,77,{"impact":349,"substance":17,"depth":112,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":350},16,"基于贝宁三省210户调查的混合方法研究，量化了生态农业对气候智慧型农业三大支柱的贡献，数据扎实、结论明确，对西非及类似小农体系有参考价值，但属区域性学术成果，公共影响层级有限。",[352,353,355],{"name":345,"url":342},{"name":345,"url":354},"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087821",{"name":345,"url":356},"https:\u002F\u002Fjournals.unizik.edu.ng\u002Findex\u002Farticle\u002Fview\u002F9044",[358,359,32,360,361],"小农户","气候智慧型农业","粮食系统韧性","气候信息服务",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":365},{"candidates":366,"agricultural_evidence":50},[367,371,376,380,387,392],{"code":35,"score":128,"supported":50,"title":368,"abstract":369,"tags":370},[67],[66,67],[],{"code":48,"score":372,"supported":50,"title":373,"abstract":374,"tags":375},11,[247],[247],[],{"code":231,"score":57,"supported":50,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":379},[],[234,235],[],{"code":381,"score":382,"supported":50,"title":383,"abstract":384,"tags":386},"G2",4,[],[385],"smallholder",[358],{"code":70,"score":382,"supported":50,"title":388,"abstract":389,"tags":391},[],[390],"可持续农业",[32],{"code":238,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":393,"abstract":394,"tags":395},[],[],[359],[397,398],"贝宁 生态农业 气候智慧型农业","西非 小农户 粮食系统韧性","贝宁生态农业气候智慧型农业-4008","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23087822",{"doi":400,"openalex_id":402,"authors":403,"venue":345,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":342,"card":406,"direction":281,"ingested_from":97},"W7215033617",[404],{"name":405,"orcid":9},"Maanzou Boukari",{"tldr":407,"method":408,"finding":409,"direction":279,"opportunity":410},"评估贝宁农业生态学作为气候智慧型农业推广路径，提升食物系统韧性。","混合方法：210户调查、32位关键信息人访谈、2010-2024年数据及PCA韧","农业生态农场土壤肥力高23%、韧性高31%、产量波动低17%，但推广受气候信息、推广服务和资金限制。","可研究数字气候信息服务与包容性气候融资如何协同破解农业生态转型的推广瓶颈。","2026-10-02T23:30:11.597021Z",{"id":413,"title":414,"url":415,"summary":416,"summary_zh":417,"content":9,"source_name":107,"source_url":415,"published_at":418,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":109,"is_selected":14,"score":419,"score_detail":420,"sources":422,"tags":424,"primary_topic":428,"secondary_topics":429,"classification":430,"search_phrases":446,"slug":449,"view_count":450,"doi":451,"paper":452,"created_at":488},3139,"Why are farmers in South India shifting from conventional ‘Green Revolution’ agriculture to natural farming?","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834351","Introduction The Green Revolution contributed to significant increases in crop production and yield in India. However, it also resulted in negative social and environmental consequences. In response, alternative farming practices have emerged, based on agroecological principles, such as natural farming. In recent years, government policies at state and national levels have promoted natural farming. However, anecdotal evidence suggests its adoption by farmers has been limited and uneven. The aim of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators involved in transitioning to natural farming in India in the context of a government natural farming program at the early stages of implementation. Methods An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. Eleven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in six villages across Anakapalli and Visakhapatnam districts of Andhra Pradesh from March to May 2023. FGD transcripts were coded and analyzed using a constant comparative method. Subsequently, a questionnaire was developed based on the FGD findings and administered to heads of 1,126 households across 82 villages in four districts in Andhra Pradesh from October to November 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analyzed separately and subsequently integrated using the ‘Diffusion of Innovations’ theory. Results Adoption rates of natural farming were low after the first few months of training, with just 23 out of 1,126 households adopting any natural farming practices. Farmers perceived that health benefits were a relative advantage of adopting natural farming over conventional farming. Internal community resource persons (iCRPs) and presentations on a Pico projector (i.e., handheld projector)emerged as predominant channels of communication. Preexisting institutional architecture in the form of women’s self-help groups contributed to an enabling social system. However, a lack of decentralized input supply, weak market linkages, perceived yield penalties and the labor- and knowledge-intensive nature of natural farming were key barriers. Conclusion The study highlights the importance of understanding the diverse motivations of farmers to adopt natural farming. Modeling peer-to-peer learning, use of mass media, and decentralized input supply may lead to improvement in natural farming uptake. Tailoring policies to address specific needs of conventional and natural farmers will likely facilitate a smoother transition to natural farming.","引言 绿色革命促进了印度作物生产和产量的显著增长。然而，它也带来了负面的社会和环境后果。作为回应，基于农业生态原则的替代性耕作方式应运而生，例如自然农法。近年来，邦和国家层面的政府政策推动了自然农法的发展。然而，零星证据表明，农民对其采用程度有限且不均衡。本研究旨在了解在政府自然农法项目实施的早期阶段背景下，印度农民向自然农法转型所面临的障碍和促进因素。方法 采用探索性序贯混合方法设计。2023年3月至5月，在安得拉邦阿纳卡帕利和维沙卡帕特南地区的6个村庄开展了11次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）。对焦点小组讨论转录稿采用持续比较法进行编码和分析。随后，基于焦点小组讨论的发现开发了一份问卷，并于2023年10月至11月对安得拉邦4个地区82个村庄的1，126户家庭户主进行了调查。定性和定量发现分别进行分析，随后运用“创新扩散”理论进行整合。结果 在培训开始后的最初几个月，自然农法的采用率较低，1，126户家庭中仅有23户采用了任何自然农法实践。农民认为健康效益是采用自然农法相对于常规农业的相对优势。内部社区资源人员（iCRPs）和Pico投影仪（即手持投影仪）演示成为主要传播渠道。以妇女自助小组形式存在的既有制度架构促成了有利的社会系统。然而，缺乏分散化投入品供应、市场联系薄弱、感知到的产量损失以及自然农法劳动力和知识密集的特性是主要障碍。结论 本研究强调了了解农民采用自然农法多元动机的重要性。模拟同伴学习、利用大众媒体以及分散化投入品供应可能有助于提高自然农法的采用率。针对常规农民和自然农民的具体需求制定政策，可能有助于促进向自然农法的更平稳转型。","2026-09-22T00:00:00Z",82,{"impact":112,"substance":17,"depth":112,"authority":128,"freshness":109,"relevant":22,"comment":421},"基于1126户问卷与焦点小组的混合方法研究，揭示印度自然农业推广的低采纳率及制度性障碍，对农业绿色转型政策有参考价值。",[423],{"name":107,"url":415},[425,30,297,426,427],"农户采纳","印度农业","自然农业",{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},[],{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":431},{"candidates":432,"agricultural_evidence":50},[433,437,441],{"code":35,"score":239,"supported":50,"title":434,"abstract":435,"tags":436},[],[66],[],{"code":381,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":438,"abstract":439,"tags":440},[],[],[425],{"code":442,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":443,"abstract":444,"tags":445},"J3",[],[],[426],[447,448],"印度 自然农业 农户采纳","农业政策 农业转型 农户采纳 印度农业","印度自然农业农户采纳-3139",5,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1834351",{"doi":451,"openalex_id":453,"authors":454,"venue":107,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":415,"card":483,"direction":279,"ingested_from":97},"W7213914303",[455,457,459,461,464,467,469,472,475,478,481],{"name":456,"orcid":9},"Bharath Yandrapu",{"name":458,"orcid":9},"Sheril Rajan",{"name":460,"orcid":9},"John Norrie",{"name":462,"orcid":463},"Peter Craig","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7653-5832",{"name":465,"orcid":466},"Sailesh Mohan","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1853-3596",{"name":468,"orcid":9},"Alfred Gathorne-Hardy",{"name":470,"orcid":471},"Michael Eddleston","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6857-3441",{"name":473,"orcid":474},"Ranjit Kumar","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1627-2943",{"name":476,"orcid":477},"Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4037-6371",{"name":479,"orcid":480},"Poornima Prabhakaran","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3134-7026",{"name":482,"orcid":9},"Prof Lindsay M. Jaacks",{"tldr":484,"method":485,"finding":486,"direction":279,"opportunity":487},"研究印度南安得拉邦农民从绿色革命农业转向自然农业的障碍与促进因素。","混合方法：11场焦点小组+1126户问卷，用创新扩散理论整合分析。","采纳率极低（1126户仅23户），健康益处是主要动力，缺投入品供应和市场链接是障碍。","可研究数字工具（如Pico投影仪、同伴学习）如何提升自然农业采纳率与市场对接。","2026-09-22T23:30:07.656930Z",{"id":490,"title":491,"url":492,"summary":493,"summary_zh":494,"content":9,"source_name":107,"source_url":492,"published_at":495,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":109,"is_selected":14,"score":496,"score_detail":497,"sources":499,"tags":501,"primary_topic":504,"secondary_topics":509,"classification":511,"search_phrases":537,"slug":540,"view_count":83,"doi":541,"paper":542,"created_at":561},2133,"Agroecological transition and performance evaluation of rice farms in northern Benin based on the FAO TAPE framework","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1913786","Introduction Rice production systems in northern Benin face major challenges related to productivity, dependence on external inputs, and long-term sustainability. However, their agroecological transition pathways and multidimensional performance remain insufficiently documented. Methods This study applied the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE) to assess 438 rice farms classified into three production systems: Lowland Rice Systems (LRS), Rainfed Rice Systems (RRS), and Irrigated Rice Systems (IRS), using socio-economic, agronomic, and environmental indicators. Results TAPE Step 1, the Characterization of Agroecological Transition (CAET), revealed significant differences among production systems (Kruskal–Wallis test, p \u003C 0.05). IRS exhibited the highest agroecological transition, with six of the 10 Elements of Agroecology scoring above 50%, particularly Diversity (75%), Efficiency (60%), Recycling (60%), Synergies (55%), and Resilience (56%). RRS achieved an intermediate CAET score (40%), characterized by stronger performance in Diversity (55%), Circular & Solidarity Economy (50%), and Resilience (50%), but lower scores for Synergies, Efficiency, Responsible Governance, and Co-creation of Knowledge. LRS recorded the lowest CAET score (32%), with consistently low scores across most agroecological elements. Pairwise comparisons indicated significantly higher CAET scores in IRS than in LRS and RRS, whereas LRS and RRS did not differ significantly. TAPE Step 2 highlighted substantial heterogeneity among the 438 farms. The overall Performance Index ranged from -2 to +5, with a median of 0. Most farms performed well in Productivity and Added Value, while the majority exhibited undesirable performance for Income, Agricultural Biodiversity, and Soil Health. Discussion Agroecological transition is uneven and structurally differentiated across rice production systems in northern Benin. Although RRS displayed intermediate CAET scores, its overall transition level was not statistically distinguishable from LRS because of considerable within-system variability. The study confirms the relevance of TAPE as a robust diagnostic tool for identifying context-specific transition pathways and guiding agroecological strategies for sustainable rice production in West Africa.","引言 贝宁北部的稻作生产系统在生产能力、对外部投入的依赖以及长期可持续性方面面临重大挑战。然而，其农业生态转型路径及多维绩效仍缺乏充分记录。方法 本研究应用联合国粮食及农业组织的农业生态绩效评估工具（TAPE），利用社会经济、农艺和环境指标，对438个稻田农场进行评估，并将其分为三种生产系统：低地稻作系统（LRS）、雨养稻作系统（RRS）和灌溉稻作系统（IRS）。结果 TAPE第一步——农业生态转型特征描述（CAET）——揭示了不同生产系统之间的显著差异（Kruskal–Wallis检验，p \u003C 0.05）。IRS表现出最高的农业生态转型水平，在农业生态学10要素中有6项得分超过50%，尤其是多样性（75%）、效率（60%）、循环利用（60%）、协同作用（55%）和韧性（56%）。RRS的CAET得分为中等水平（40%），其特征是在多样性（55%）、循环与团结经济（50%）和韧性（50%）方面表现较强，但在协同作用、效率、负责任治理和知识共创方面得分较低。LRS的CAET得分最低（32%），在大多数农业生态要素上得分持续偏低。两两比较表明，IRS的CAET得分显著高于LRS和RRS，而LRS与RRS之间无显著差异。TAPE第二步揭示了438个农场之间存在显著异质性。总体绩效指数范围为-2至+5，中位数为0。大多数农场在生产力和附加值方面表现良好，而多数农场在收入、农业生物多样性和土壤健康方面表现不理想。讨论 贝宁北部稻作生产系统的农业生态转型不均衡，且存在结构性分化。尽管RRS显示出中等的CAET得分，但由于系统内变异性较大，其总体转型水平与LRS在统计上无法区分。本研究证实了TAPE作为一种稳健诊断工具的相关性，可用于识别因地制宜的转型路径，并指导西非可持续稻作生产的农业生态策略。","2026-09-10T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":210,"substance":17,"depth":112,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":498},"基于FAO TAPE框架对贝宁北部438个水稻农场进行多维评估，方法规范、数据扎实，对生态农业转型评价具有参考价值，但属区域案例研究，公共影响范围有限。",[500],{"name":107,"url":492},[390,502,32,503,298],"水稻种植","农业评价体系",{"code":505,"slug":506,"name":507,"path":508,"parent_code":204},"A1","rice","水稻","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Frice",[510],{"code":35,"slug":36,"name":37,"path":38,"parent_code":39},{"status":42,"locked":14,"version":43,"method":44,"evidence":512},{"candidates":513,"agricultural_evidence":50},[514,519,523,527,533],{"code":505,"score":210,"supported":50,"title":515,"abstract":516,"tags":518},[506],[517,506],"稻田",[502],{"code":35,"score":113,"supported":50,"title":520,"abstract":521,"tags":522},[],[227,66,36,67],[],{"code":231,"score":57,"supported":50,"title":524,"abstract":525,"tags":526},[],[234,235],[],{"code":528,"score":239,"supported":50,"title":529,"abstract":530,"tags":532},"H3",[],[531],"灌溉",[],{"code":70,"score":83,"supported":14,"title":534,"abstract":535,"tags":536},[],[],[390,32],[538,539],"农业评价体系 可持续农业 水稻种植 生态农业","农业评价体系 可持续农业","农业评价体系可持续农业水稻种植生态农业-2133","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1913786",{"doi":541,"openalex_id":543,"authors":544,"venue":107,"cited_by_count":90,"oa_url":492,"card":556,"direction":279,"ingested_from":97},"W7212143237",[545,547,549,551,553],{"name":546,"orcid":9},"Soufianou S. Kibissa",{"name":548,"orcid":9},"Ismainou A. Gbago",{"name":550,"orcid":9},"Bernus Z. Djigbe",{"name":552,"orcid":9},"Pierre G. Tovihoudji",{"name":554,"orcid":555},"Rodrigue V.C. Diogo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5348-5588",{"tldr":557,"method":558,"finding":559,"direction":279,"opportunity":560},"用FAO TAPE框架评估贝宁北部438个水稻农场的生态农业转型与多维表现。","FAO TAPE框架，438个农场分三类系统，社会经济农艺环境指标。","灌溉系统转型最高，雨养与低地无显著差异；收入、生物多样性和土壤健康普遍不佳。","可结合遥感与物联网长时序监测，量化TAPE指标动态，弥补单次调查的时空局限。","2026-09-11T23:30:08.063114Z"]