[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-4049":3,"related-4049":102},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":32,"secondary_topics":38,"classification":39,"search_phrases":78,"slug":81,"view_count":62,"doi":82,"paper":83,"created_at":101},4049,"Transient prosperity or durable resilience: how place-based specialty agricultural policy shapes rural household welfare in China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1938168","Background Improving rural household welfare is central to global sustainable development. China’s place-based Specialty Agricultural Product Advantageous Zones (SAZ) policy promotes specialized agricultural clusters. Nevertheless, existing literature mostly evaluates policy effects based on monetary income, with limited evidence on whether such policy merely delivers short-run transient prosperity or builds long-run durable household development resilience. This study fills this gap by disentangling the policy’s dual welfare outcomes and underlying factor‑reallocation mechanisms Methods Drawing on 2013‑2021 matched panel data combining the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) micro‑household data and county-level socioeconomic statistics, this paper adopts a multi-period difference‑in‑differences (DID) framework to estimate SAZ impacts on two welfare metrics: multidimensional household income quality (capturing transient prosperity) and model-derived household development resilience (measuring durable resilience). Mediation analysis is further applied to test three transmission pathways: agricultural land intensification, employment structure transformation, and production technology upgrading. Parallel trend tests, placebo permutation, heterogeneous treatment effect diagnostics, threshold changing robustness checks, and instrumental‑variable estimation are implemented to establish causal validity. Results SAZ construction improves household income quality in the short run to generate transient prosperity, and enhances long-term development resilience to build durable resilience. This is mainly attributed to three complementary transmission channels: agricultural land intensification, employment structure transformation, and production technology upgrading. Among them, employment structure transformation serves as the dominant pathway, particularly for long-term development resilience, while production technology upgrading and agricultural land intensification play reinforcing roles. Heterogeneity analysis shows that households in counties with stronger agricultural foundations obtain larger welfare gains, and this advantage is especially pronounced for durable resilience. Across SAZ product categories, all five types significantly raise short-term income quality, but the gains in development resilience are insignificant for aquaculture zones. Across household types, transient prosperity gains are broadly comparable regardless of income structure, while durable resilience gains are concentrated among agriculture-dominated households. Conclusion Place-based specialty-agricultural policy can achieve not only immediate income‑driven prosperity but also durable livelihood resilience via land, labor, and technology factor reallocation. To maximize policy returns, local governments should reform SAZ performance appraisal to incorporate resilience-related indicators, prioritize employment structure upgrading, and implement differentiated support for lagging counties, specific SAZ product categories, and heterogeneous household groups. The findings offer replicable practical references for developing economies pursuing balanced short-run welfare improvement and long-term resilient rural livelihoods.","背景 改善农村家庭福利是全球可持续发展的核心议题。中国实施的优势特色农产品优势区（SAZ）政策旨在推动专业化农业集群发展。然而，现有文献多基于货币收入评估政策效果，关于该政策究竟仅带来短期暂时繁荣，还是能够构建长期持久的家庭发展韧性，尚缺乏充分证据。本研究通过区分该政策的双重福利效应及其背后的要素再配置机制，填补了这一空白。方法 基于2013—2021年中国家庭金融调查（CHFS）微观家庭数据与县级社会经济统计数据匹配的面板数据，本文采用多期双重差分（DID）框架，估计SAZ对两项福利指标的影响：多维家庭收入质量（反映暂时繁荣）和模型推导的家庭发展韧性（衡量持久韧性）。进一步运用中介分析检验三条传导路径：农业土地集约化、就业结构转型和生产技术升级。通过平行趋势检验、安慰剂置换检验、异质性处理效应诊断、阈值变化稳健性检验和工具变量估计，以确保因果推断的有效性。结果 SAZ建设在短期内提升家庭收入质量，产生暂时繁荣，并增强长期发展韧性，构建持久韧性。这主要归因于三条互补的传导渠道：农业土地集约化、就业结构转型和生产技术升级。其中，就业结构转型是主导路径，尤其在长期发展韧性方面作用突出，而生产技术升级和农业土地集约化则发挥强化作用。异质性分析表明，农业基础较强县的家庭获得更大的福利增益，且这一优势在持久韧性方面尤为显著。在SAZ产品类别中，五类产品均显著提高短期收入质量，但水产养殖区的发",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-02T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,81,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},18,22,19,14,8,1,"基于CHFS微观面板数据评估特色农产品优势区政策对农户短期增收与长期韧性的双重效应，方法严谨、结论有政策参考价值，值得进入每日精选。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"乡村振兴","特色农业","农业经济","产业政策","农户福祉",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},"J1","policy-planning","政策制度与发展规划","\u002Ftopic\u002Fpolicy\u002Fpolicy-planning","J",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":47},[45,52,60,67,73],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":48,"abstract":50,"tags":51},11,true,[49],"agricultural policy",[49],[],{"code":53,"score":54,"supported":47,"title":55,"abstract":56,"tags":59},"D",6,[],[57,58],"水产","aquaculture",[],{"code":61,"score":62,"supported":47,"title":63,"abstract":64,"tags":66},"I7",3,[],[65],"因果推断",[],{"code":68,"score":69,"supported":14,"title":70,"abstract":71,"tags":72},"G4",2,[],[],[30,28],{"code":74,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":75,"abstract":76,"tags":77},"G",[],[],[27],[79,80],"CHFS 农户发展韧性","乡村振兴 产业政策 农业经济 农户福祉","CHFS农户发展韧性-4049","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1938168",{"doi":82,"openalex_id":84,"authors":85,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":92,"oa_url":93,"card":94,"direction":98,"ingested_from":100},"W7215929771",[86,88,90],{"name":87,"orcid":9},"Zhaohua Zhang",{"name":89,"orcid":9},"Zhiyou Shi",{"name":91,"orcid":9},"Shengli Shi",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1938168\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":95,"method":96,"finding":97,"direction":98,"opportunity":99},"评估中国特色农产品优势区政策对农户收入质量与发展韧性的双重影响及机制。","基于CHFS与县级面板数据，采用多期DID与中介分析检验三条路径。","政策既带来短期收入质量提升，也增强长期发展韧性，就业结构转型为主导路径。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探究数字技术如何赋能就业结构转型与生产升级，以强化政策长期韧性效应。","openalex","2026-10-03T23:30:07.863943Z",{"total":54,"page":22,"page_size":54,"items":103},[104,148,212,264,305,372],{"id":105,"title":106,"url":107,"summary":108,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":109,"source_url":9,"published_at":110,"category":111,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":47,"score":112,"score_detail":113,"sources":117,"tags":119,"primary_topic":124,"secondary_topics":125,"classification":126,"search_phrases":143,"slug":146,"view_count":54,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":147},2548,"人民日报 2026年9月10日 02版 政策解读·问答 如何引导更多资金流向三农领域","https:\u002F\u002Fcpc.people.com.cn\u002FBIG5\u002Fn1\u002F2026\u002F0910\u002Fc64387-40795954.html","人民日报记者郁静娴、朱隽专访农业农村部有关负责人。围绕健全多元投入格局，方案从财政、债券、信贷、保险、民间投资、农村集体资产等6个方面进行部署；强化价格、补贴、保险等政策支持和协同。","人民日报 2026-09-10","2026-09-09T18:00:00Z","政策",88,{"impact":114,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":115,"freshness":54,"relevant":22,"comment":116},27,15,"央媒专访农业农村部负责人，系统解读财政、债券、信贷、保险、民间投资与集体资产六方面多元投入部署，政策条款与信源权威性俱佳，值得进入每日精选。",[118],{"name":109,"url":107},[27,120,121,122,123],"农业保险","农村金融","三农投入","民间投资",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":127},{"candidates":128,"agricultural_evidence":47},[129,134,139],{"code":33,"score":21,"supported":47,"title":130,"abstract":132,"tags":133},[131],"政策解读",[],[],{"code":135,"score":69,"supported":14,"title":136,"abstract":137,"tags":138},"G3",[],[],[120,121],{"code":74,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":140,"abstract":141,"tags":142},[],[],[27],[144,145],"三农投入 乡村振兴 农业保险 农村金融","三农投入 乡村振兴","三农投入乡村振兴农业保险农村金融-2548","2026-09-16T00:03:44.736994Z",{"id":149,"title":150,"url":151,"summary":152,"summary_zh":153,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":151,"published_at":154,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":155,"score_detail":156,"sources":160,"tags":162,"primary_topic":168,"secondary_topics":169,"classification":170,"search_phrases":190,"slug":193,"view_count":92,"doi":194,"paper":195,"created_at":211},4413,"Planting subsidies or brand building? Policy thresholds and goal conflict in agribusiness-led contract farming","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1964914","Introduction Under yield uncertainty and agribusiness-led contract farming, government intervention is important for sustaining agricultural production and supporting farmer profit. Yet production-side planting subsidies and demand-side brand-building policies operate through different mechanisms, leaving their relative advantages and applicable conditions unclear. This study examines how the government should choose between the two policies and how firm social responsibility shapes their relative performance. Methods We develop a sequential game involving a government, an agribusiness firm, and a farmer under stochastic yield. The firm's objective incorporates concern for farmer profit. Equilibrium decisions are derived by backward induction, and the policies are compared in terms of social welfare and farmer profit. Numerical analysis illustrates the analytical results. Results The planting subsidy policy directly strengthens the farmer's production incentive, whereas the brand-building policy expands market demand and induces the firm to offer a higher procurement price. The benefits of brand building depend critically on its cost-effectiveness. We identify two endogenous thresholds: a social-welfare threshold and a farmer-profit threshold, with the former strictly lower than the latter. As brand-building cost-effectiveness increases, policy preference shifts through three regions: planting-subsidy dominance, goal conflict, and brand-building dominance. In the intermediate region, brand building generates higher social welfare, while the farmer remains better off under planting subsidies. Yield risk, price sensitivity, and planting costs widen the goal-conflict region, whereas higher expected yield and stronger firm social responsibility narrow it. Market size affects absolute outcomes but does not change the relative policy ranking. Discussion These findings extend the agricultural-policy literature from the design of production subsidies to the choice between production-side and demand-side interventions. They show that improvements in aggregate welfare do not necessarily translate into greater benefits for farmers.","引言 在产量不确定性和农业企业主导的订单农业背景下，政府干预对于维持农业生产和支持农民利润至关重要。然而，生产端的种植补贴与需求端的品牌建设政策通过不同机制发挥作用，其相对优势和适用条件尚不明确。本研究考察政府应如何在两种政策之间进行选择，以及企业社会责任如何影响二者的相对表现。方法 我们构建了一个包含政府、农业企业和农户的序贯博弈模型，其中产量具有随机性。企业的目标函数中纳入了对农民利润的关注。通过逆向归纳法求解均衡决策，并从社会福利和农民利润两个维度对政策进行比较。数值分析用于验证解析结果。结果 种植补贴政策直接强化了农户的生产激励，而品牌建设政策则扩大了市场需求并促使企业提供更高的收购价格。品牌建设的收益关键取决于其成本效益。我们识别出两个内生阈值：社会福利阈值和农民利润阈值，且前者严格低于后者。随着品牌建设成本效益的提高，政策偏好依次经历三个阶段：种植补贴占优、目标冲突和品牌建设占优。在中间区域，品牌建设带来更高的社会福利，而农户在种植补贴下境况更好。产量风险、价格敏感性和种植成本会扩大目标冲突区域，而更高的预期产量和更强的企业社会责任则会缩小该区域。市场规模影响绝对结果，但不改变政策的相对排序。讨论 这些发现将农业政策文献从生产补贴的设计拓展至生产端与需求端干预之间的选择。研究表明，总体福利的改善并不必然转化为农民收益的增加。","2026-10-07T00:00:00Z",77,{"impact":157,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":158,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":159},16,13,"以序贯博弈模型揭示生产端补贴与需求端品牌建设之间的社会福利与农户利润目标冲突，为农业政策选择提供新结论，学术增量明确但属理论模型研究，公共影响有限。",[161],{"name":10,"url":151},[163,164,165,166,167],"品牌建设","农业政策","订单农业","农业补贴","农户收益",{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":171},{"candidates":172,"agricultural_evidence":47},[173,177,182,186],{"code":33,"score":62,"supported":47,"title":174,"abstract":175,"tags":176},[],[164],[],{"code":178,"score":69,"supported":14,"title":179,"abstract":180,"tags":181},"E5",[],[],[163,165],{"code":135,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":183,"abstract":184,"tags":185},[],[],[166],{"code":68,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":187,"abstract":188,"tags":189},[],[],[165],[191,192],"订单农业 种植补贴 品牌建设","农业政策 农业补贴 农户收益 品牌建设","订单农业种植补贴品牌建设-4413","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1964914",{"doi":194,"openalex_id":196,"authors":197,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":92,"oa_url":204,"card":205,"direction":209,"ingested_from":100},"W7220848356",[198,201],{"name":199,"orcid":200},"Lidong Chen","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6228-1536",{"name":202,"orcid":203},"Zigong Cai","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8551-9159","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1964914\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":206,"method":207,"finding":208,"direction":209,"opportunity":210},"构建政府、农企与农户序贯博弈，比较种植补贴与品牌建设政策并识别目标冲突阈值。","随机产量下序贯博弈、逆向归纳与数值分析。","品牌建设成本效益提高使政策偏好经历补贴主导、目标冲突、品牌主导三阶段，福利与农户利润阈值不同。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可结合实证数据检验阈值，并设计兼顾社会福利与农户利润的混合政策机制。","2026-10-08T23:30:07.437474Z",{"id":213,"title":214,"url":215,"summary":216,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":217,"source_url":9,"published_at":218,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":219,"score_detail":220,"sources":224,"tags":226,"primary_topic":231,"secondary_topics":237,"classification":239,"search_phrases":251,"slug":254,"view_count":62,"doi":9,"paper":255,"created_at":263},1874,"高群教授团队：中国智慧农业政策演进特征与优化策略——基于工具-主题-目标三维框架（《智慧农业(中英文)》2026年第3期）","https:\u002F\u002Fcj.sina.com.cn\u002Farticle\u002Fnorm_detail?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffinance.sina.com.cn%2Fwm%2F2026-09-03%2Fdoc-iniqqfvs1923424.shtml","该研究基于政策工具理论，构建工具-主题-目标三维分析框架，以2013—2025年240份智慧农业中央政策文本为研究对象，运用潜在狄利克雷分配主题模型及内容分析法；中国智慧农业政策时序演进趋势显著，分为政策探索期(2013—2015年)、试点示范期(2016—2018年)、战略推进期(2019—2023年)、全面深化期(2024年至今)4个阶段。DOI: 10.12133\u002Fj.smartag.SA202603016。","《智慧农业(中英文)》2026, 8(3): 253-269","2026-09-03T00:00:00Z",84,{"impact":221,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":20,"freshness":222,"relevant":22,"comment":223},25,5,"基于三维框架系统分析中国智慧农业政策演进，数据详实，对政策制定有参考价值。",[225],{"name":217,"url":215},[227,228,229,230],"智慧农业","政策工具","政策演进","主题模型",{"code":232,"slug":233,"name":234,"path":235,"parent_code":236},"I1","smart-agriculture","智慧农业总论","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fsmart-agriculture","I",[238],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":240},{"candidates":241,"agricultural_evidence":47},[242,247],{"code":232,"score":243,"supported":47,"title":244,"abstract":245,"tags":246},12,[227],[227],[227],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":248,"abstract":249,"tags":250},[164],[164],[],[252,253],"主题模型 政策工具 政策演进 智慧农业","主题模型 政策工具","主题模型政策工具政策演进智慧农业-1874",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":256,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":92,"oa_url":9,"card":257,"direction":98,"ingested_from":262},[],{"tldr":258,"method":259,"finding":260,"direction":98,"opportunity":261},"构建三维框架分析中国智慧农业政策演进，划分四阶段并提出优化策略。","政策工具理论、LDA主题模型、内容分析法，分析240份中央政策文本。","政策演进分探索、试点、推进、深化四阶段，需优化工具组合与目标协同。","可深入量化政策工具与产业绩效关系，或对比地方政策差异，探索政策落地效果评估体系。","agent","2026-09-08T00:07:15.417987Z",{"id":265,"title":266,"url":267,"summary":268,"summary_zh":9,"content":9,"source_name":269,"source_url":9,"published_at":270,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":271,"score_detail":272,"sources":274,"tags":276,"primary_topic":279,"secondary_topics":280,"classification":282,"search_phrases":293,"slug":296,"view_count":92,"doi":9,"paper":297,"created_at":304},1580,"中国智慧农业政策演进特征与优化策略——基于\"工具-主题-目标\"三维框架（智慧农业 8(3): 253-269）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.sohu.com\u002Fa\u002F1071531957_122014422","南昌大学高群、罗银芳基于政策工具理论构建\"工具-主题-目标\"三维分析框架，以 2013—2025 年 240 份智慧农业中央政策文本为研究对象，运用 LDA 主题模型及内容分析法揭示智慧农业政策演进特征。结果显示：中国智慧农业政策时序演进趋势显著，分为政策探索期（2013—2015）、试点示范期（2016—2018）、战略推进期（2019—2023）、全面深化期（2024 至今）4 个阶段；综合运用了供给型、环境型、需求型 3 类政策工具但内部工具构成存在显著失衡；政策注意力高度集中于数字转型与智慧升级主题，政策主题与政策工具的适配度有待提升。","智慧农业(中英文)期刊","2026-09-01T00:00:00Z",82,{"impact":221,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":20,"freshness":62,"relevant":22,"comment":273},"基于三维框架系统分析2013-2025年智慧农业政策演进，数据详实，对政策制定有参考价值。",[275],{"name":269,"url":267},[227,228,277,278],"政策分析","演进阶段",{"code":232,"slug":233,"name":234,"path":235,"parent_code":236},[281],{"code":33,"slug":34,"name":35,"path":36,"parent_code":37},{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":283},{"candidates":284,"agricultural_evidence":47},[285,289],{"code":232,"score":243,"supported":47,"title":286,"abstract":287,"tags":288},[227],[227],[227],{"code":33,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},[164],[164],[],[294,295],"政策分析 政策工具 智慧农业 演进阶段","政策分析 政策工具","政策分析政策工具智慧农业演进阶段-1580",{"doi":9,"openalex_id":9,"authors":298,"venue":9,"cited_by_count":92,"oa_url":9,"card":299,"direction":98,"ingested_from":262},[],{"tldr":300,"method":301,"finding":302,"direction":98,"opportunity":303},"分析2013-2025年240份智慧农业政策，揭示演进阶段、工具失衡与主题聚焦。","构建三维框架，用LDA主题模型和内容分析法分析政策文本。","政策分四阶段，工具失衡，注意力集中于数字转型，适配度待提升。","可研究政策工具组合优化与主题适配，或地方政策与中央的协同差异。","2026-09-04T00:05:34.063197Z",{"id":306,"title":307,"url":308,"summary":309,"summary_zh":310,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":308,"published_at":311,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":47,"score":312,"score_detail":313,"sources":316,"tags":318,"primary_topic":323,"secondary_topics":327,"classification":328,"search_phrases":349,"slug":352,"view_count":92,"doi":353,"paper":354,"created_at":371},5551,"The effect of rural tourism on rural prosperity: evidence from China on agricultural labor productivity, incomes, and household food consumption","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904226","Policy support in China has disproportionately favored rural tourism as a core pillar of rural revitalization. However, its net effect on agricultural labor productivity, rural income, and household consumption remains empirically untested. This study examines how rural tourism expenditure affects these three dimensions of rural prosperity and evaluates alternative policy instruments to maximize developmental benefits. The analysis employs a dynamic autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) simulation model using annual Chinese data from 1994 to 2023. The findings reveal that an increase in rural tourism expenditure significantly reduces agricultural labor productivity, rural household income, and rural household consumption in both the short run and the long run. A positive shock to rural tourism expenditure similarly generates a negative response across all three outcomes, with the effects persisting over the forecast horizon. These results suggest that the net effect of rural tourism expansion on rural prosperity is consistently negative, challenging the conventional assumption that rural tourism serves as an unconditional driver of rural development. The findings call for conditional tourism subsidies, complementary investments in agricultural capital, and spatially differentiated rural development policies that safeguard agricultural livelihoods while permitting tourism to develop only where it does not displace farming.","中国的政策支持过度倾向于将乡村旅游作为乡村振兴的核心支柱。然而，其对农业劳动生产率、农村收入和家庭消费的净效应尚未得到实证检验。本研究考察乡村旅游支出如何影响农村繁荣的这三个维度，并评估替代性政策工具以最大化发展效益。分析采用动态自回归分布滞后（ARDL）模拟模型，使用1994年至2023年的中国年度数据。研究发现，乡村旅游支出的增加在短期和长期均显著降低农业劳动生产率、农村家庭收入和农村家庭消费。乡村旅游支出的正向冲击同样对上述三项结果产生负向响应，且效应在预测期内持续存在。这些结果表明，乡村旅游扩张对农村繁荣的净效应始终为负，挑战了乡村旅游无条件作为农村发展驱动力的传统假设。研究结果呼吁实施有条件的旅游补贴、对农业资本进行配套投资，以及空间差异化的农村发展政策，在保障农业生计的同时，仅允许旅游业在不挤占农业的地区发展。","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z",87,{"impact":18,"substance":314,"depth":17,"authority":20,"freshness":13,"relevant":22,"comment":315},23,"基于1994—2023年中国数据的ARDL实证发现，乡村旅游扩张对农业劳动生产率、农户收入与消费的净效应持续为负，对无条件扶持乡村旅游的政策假设构成有力挑战，值得进入每日精选。",[317],{"name":10,"url":308},[27,319,320,321,322],"农村消费","乡村旅游","农户收入","农业劳动生产率",{"code":68,"slug":324,"name":325,"path":326,"parent_code":74},"rural-industry","乡村产业与县域经济","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-industry",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":329},{"candidates":330,"agricultural_evidence":47},[331,336,342],{"code":68,"score":115,"supported":47,"title":332,"abstract":334,"tags":335},[333],"rural tourism",[320,333],[320],{"code":74,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":337,"abstract":338,"tags":341},[],[27,339,340],"农村发展","rural development",[27],{"code":343,"score":344,"supported":47,"title":345,"abstract":346,"tags":348},"G6",4,[],[347],"rural income",[321],[350,351],"乡村旅游 农业劳动生产率 农户收入","乡村旅游 ARDL 农村消费","乡村旅游农业劳动生产率农户收入-5551","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904226",{"doi":353,"openalex_id":355,"authors":356,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":92,"oa_url":365,"card":366,"direction":98,"ingested_from":100},"W7223149969",[357,360,362],{"name":358,"orcid":359},"Jin Liu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7654-255X",{"name":361,"orcid":9},"Betelhemabraham Geremew",{"name":363,"orcid":364},"Meseret C. Abate","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6486-5607","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1904226\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":367,"method":368,"finding":369,"direction":98,"opportunity":370},"用中国1994-2023年数据检验乡村旅游支出对农业劳动生产率、农村收入与消费的净效应。","动态自回归分布滞后（ARDL）模拟模型，1994-2023年中国年度数据。","乡村旅游支出增加在短期和长期均显著降低农业劳动生产率、农村家庭收入与消费。","可结合县域面板与空间异质性，量化旅游与农业的挤出效应并识别有条件补贴的适用边界。","2026-10-22T11:20:16.227845Z",{"id":373,"title":374,"url":375,"summary":376,"summary_zh":9,"content":377,"source_name":378,"source_url":9,"published_at":311,"category":379,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":380,"score_detail":381,"sources":384,"tags":386,"primary_topic":391,"secondary_topics":395,"classification":396,"search_phrases":412,"slug":415,"view_count":92,"doi":9,"paper":9,"created_at":416},5501,"湖南部署常态化精准帮扶与秋粮收购攻坚战","https:\u002F\u002Fnews.qq.com\u002Frain\u002Fa\u002F20261021A0DV5F00","10月21日湖南省委副书记谢卫江在全省农业农村工作专题会议上要求，今年是推进常态化帮扶的第一年，要落实30个省级乡村振兴重点帮扶县常态化帮扶机制，坚决守牢不发生规模性返贫致贫底线；同时紧盯中晚稻集中上市，加快解决送粮排队、仓容不足、轮换不畅问题，以农民「种粮卖得出」为底线打好秋粮收购攻坚战。","湖南日报10月21日讯（全媒体记者 黄晗）21日，省委副书记谢卫江在长沙主持召开全省农业农村工作专题会议，深入学习贯彻习近平总书记关于“三农”工作的重要论述精神，落实省委工作要求，部署常态化帮扶、秋粮收购等工作。\n\n谢卫江指出，做好常态化帮扶和秋粮收购工作，事关不发生规模性返贫致贫、维护国家粮食安全“两条底线”。要深学细悟习近平总书记重要指示精神，深刻认识做好这两项工作的特殊重要性、任务艰巨性、时间紧迫性，把这两项工作摆在当前“三农”工作的突出位置抓紧抓好，以实际行动深刻领悟“两个确立”的决定性意义、坚决做到“两个维护”。\n\n谢卫江强调，今年是推进常态化帮扶的第一年。各级各部门要强化答卷意识，压紧压实责任，持续深化去年中央考核评估反馈问题、省级自查督查发现问题整改，严格对照今年中央考核方案做好自查整改，认真落实30个省级乡村振兴重点帮扶县常态化帮扶机制，坚决守牢不发生规模性返贫致贫底线。\n\n谢卫江强调，面对今年粮食收购复杂形势，当前要紧盯中晚稻集中上市，加快解决好送粮排队、仓容不足、轮换不畅等现实问题，坚决打好秋粮收购攻坚战。要处理好立足当前与着眼长远、市场收购与政府托市、促进流通与确保安全、部门工作与群众利益的关系，以农民“种粮卖得出”为底线，以“卖个好价钱”为目标，长短结合、统筹兼顾，坚决扛牢维护国家粮食安全的政治责任。\n\n谢卫江要求，四季度是全年工作冲刺收官的关键期。各级各部门要对账盘点，统筹抓好秋冬农业生产、农业品牌建设、农田水利和高标准农田建设、农业农村重点工作专项整治等工作，确保“十五五”开局之年圆满收官。","湖南日报 2026-10-21","报道",75,{"impact":18,"substance":17,"depth":115,"authority":46,"freshness":382,"relevant":22,"comment":383},9,"省级专题会议部署防返贫与秋粮收购两条底线，政策信号明确、时效性强，但属常规工作部署，信息增量有限。",[385],{"name":378,"url":375},[27,387,388,389,390],"粮食安全","常态化帮扶","秋粮收购","防止返贫",{"code":343,"slug":392,"name":393,"path":394,"parent_code":74},"rural-integration","帮扶与城乡融合","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Frural-integration",[],{"status":40,"locked":14,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":397},{"candidates":398,"agricultural_evidence":47},[399,403,407],{"code":343,"score":222,"supported":47,"title":400,"abstract":401,"tags":402},[],[388],[388,390],{"code":74,"score":344,"supported":47,"title":404,"abstract":405,"tags":406},[],[27],[27],{"code":408,"score":69,"supported":14,"title":409,"abstract":410,"tags":411},"A8",[],[],[389,387],[413,414],"湖南 秋粮收购","湖南 常态化帮扶","湖南秋粮收购-5501","2026-10-22T00:06:58.311020Z"]