[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-50":3,"related-50":55},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":8,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":22,"tags":24,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":31,"classification":32,"search_phrases":50,"slug":53,"view_count":18,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":54},50,"国内首个农业AI全场景应用标杆——农业开源鸿蒙国产替代大场景在湖北荆门落成","https:\u002F\u002Fh.mffb.com.cn\u002Fa\u002F518942.html","2026年4月24日，国内首个农业AI全场景应用标杆——农业开源鸿蒙国产替代大场景在湖北荆门落成。该项目由麦麦科技集团、深开鸿、中信农业联合打造，北京微摩尔科技作为核心生态伙伴深度参与场景建设。项目以开源鸿蒙为技术底座，聚焦\"一核心、三场景、四平台\"，是华中区域唯一实现全场景自主可控的国家级农业创新高地。自2025年12月开工，历时近五个月建成，构建\"育种研发—生产运营—物流销售\"全闭环产业链体系，标志我国农业科技核心底座自主可控取得突破性进展。",null,"微摩尔科技深度参与农业开源鸿蒙国产替代大场景落成 共筑智慧 “中国方案”\n\n2026 年 4 月 24 日，国内首个农业 AI 全场景应用标杆 ——农业开源鸿蒙国产替代大场景在湖北荆门圆满落成。该项目由麦麦科技集团、深开鸿、中信农业联合打造，北京微摩尔科技有限公司作为核心生态伙伴深度参与场景建设，与产业链上下游企业共同见证中国智慧农业国产化迈入生态聚合新阶段。\n\n本次落成仪式汇聚农业农村部相关领导、行业专家与农业科技企业代表。作为专注高端国产创新仪器研发的高科技企业，北京微摩尔科技携光生物探测、精准传感等核心技术与产品深度参与本项目，为智慧农业感知层提供高精度、全自主、高可靠的国产硬件支撑，助力项目 “育种研发 — 生产运营 — 物流销售” 全闭环产业链体系构建。\n\n本项目以开源鸿蒙为技术底座，聚焦 “一核心、三场景、四平台”，是华中区域唯一实现全场景自主可控的国家级农业创新高地。自 2025 年 12 月开工，历时近五个月建成，标志我国农业科技核心底座自主可控取得突破性进展，技术实力跻身国际先进行列。\n\n项目现场，微摩尔科技与中科融信等企业作为首批生态伙伴亮相，依托开源鸿蒙底层兼容与微摩尔研发的高精度农业及环境传感设备，在本场景建设项目中可实现作物生长环境实时监测、光合效率精准评估、水肥智能调控，可大幅提升农业生产精细化与智能化水平，实现农业生产研究技术与设备国产化高水平替代，精准助力夯实粮食安全防线。\n\n北京微摩尔科技将持续深耕农业精准传感与检测领域，以自主创新技术赋能开源鸿蒙农业大场景，与麦麦科技等生态伙伴协同攻关，加速智慧农业底层技术国产替代，助力中国农业科技自立自强，推动国产农业 AI 技术走向全球。\n\n本文来自网友投稿或网络内容，如有侵犯您的权益请联系我们删除，联系邮箱：wyl860211@qq.com 。\n\n抢抓低空经济新机遇 开拓农业发展新赛道 —— 农投土地发展公司成功中标河南小麦植保项目\n\n【公司要闻】北大荒农服集团(北安市)农业服务有限公司到龙镇农场对接2026年社会化服务工作","民生频道 · 2026-07-28","2026-07-28T00:46:00Z","报道",10,false,56,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":13,"authority":19,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":21},20,12,4,1,"国内首个农业AI全场景应用标杆落成，有产业级意义，但正文偏企业宣传，信源为地方媒体转载，深度一般。",[23],{"name":10,"url":6},[12,25,26,27,28,29,30],"智慧农业","开源鸿蒙","农业人工智能","国产替代","湖北荆门","自主可控",[],{"status":33,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":36},"unclassified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":37,"agricultural_evidence":48,"reason":49},[38,43],{"code":39,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":40,"abstract":41,"tags":42},"I1",[],[],[25],{"code":44,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":45,"abstract":46,"tags":47},"I2",[],[],[27],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[51,52],"农业人工智能 国产替代 开源鸿蒙 智慧农业","农业人工智能 国产替代","农业人工智能国产替代开源鸿蒙智慧农业-50","2026-07-28T23:53:29.254876Z",{"total":56,"page":20,"page_size":56,"items":57},6,[58,110,189,260,326,378],{"id":59,"title":60,"url":61,"summary":62,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":63,"source_url":8,"published_at":8,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":48,"score":64,"score_detail":65,"sources":72,"tags":74,"primary_topic":77,"secondary_topics":83,"classification":84,"search_phrases":104,"slug":107,"view_count":108,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":109},5117,"中国农科院南京农机所发布农机智能引擎AMES1000 破解智能农机底层核心技术瓶颈","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.caas.cn\u002Fxwzx\u002Fmtxw\u002F152411b343ff453d841275f2d2a3999b.htm","农业农村部南京农业机械化研究所发布拥有完全自主知识产权的农机智能引擎AMES1000新产品,破解我国智能农机底层核心技术瓶颈。南京农机所创新提出农机智能引擎AMES概念,联合中农国科(南京)智能装备科技有限公司完成产品落地,实现自动驾驶、处方图精准作业、多机协同、故障诊断等六大核心功能,具备高稳定、高可靠、易扩展等优势,可广泛适配各类农机机型,覆盖耕、种、管、收全农业生产场景,目前已在拖拉机、插秧机、田间管理机器人等装备上开展田间验证与熟化。","新华社 中国农业科学院 2026 年 10 月",89,{"impact":66,"substance":67,"depth":68,"authority":69,"freshness":70,"relevant":20,"comment":71},27,22,17,15,8,"国家级科研机构发布完全自主知识产权的农机智能引擎，破解智能农机底层核心技术瓶颈，属产业级重大突破，信息增量与权威度俱佳，值得进入每日精选。",[73],{"name":63,"url":61},[25,27,75,30,76],"智能农机","农机装备",{"code":78,"slug":79,"name":80,"path":81,"parent_code":82},"F5","machinery","农机装备与机械化","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Fmachinery","F",[],{"status":85,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":86},"classified",{"candidates":87,"agricultural_evidence":48},[88,96,100],{"code":78,"score":89,"supported":48,"title":90,"abstract":92,"tags":95},19,[91],"农机",[91,93,94],"农业机械","机械化",[76,75],{"code":39,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":97,"abstract":98,"tags":99},[],[],[25],{"code":44,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":101,"abstract":102,"tags":103},[],[],[27],[105,106],"南京农机所 AMES1000","农机智能引擎 AMES","南京农机所AMES1000-5117",2,"2026-10-17T00:13:39.688195Z",{"id":111,"title":112,"url":113,"summary":114,"summary_zh":8,"content":8,"source_name":115,"source_url":8,"published_at":116,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":117,"score_detail":118,"sources":123,"tags":125,"primary_topic":129,"secondary_topics":134,"classification":135,"search_phrases":184,"slug":187,"view_count":159,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":188},922,"中国农业银行农业AI场景应用首批名单发布 数字金融赋能智慧农业","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.farmer.com.cn\u002F2026\u002F08\u002F23\u002Fwap_991026650.html","中国农业银行近日发布农业AI场景应用首批名单，覆盖种植、畜牧、渔业、农机、农产品加工等全产业链。聚焦大田种植精准管理、设施农业智能控制、畜禽养殖健康监测、水产养殖智能管控、农机作业智能调度、农产品质量追溯等核心场景，推动数字金融与智慧农业深度融合，为新型农业经营主体提供低门槛、低成本、易获取的数字普惠金融服务。","中国农网 2026-08-23","2026-08-23T00:00:00Z",73,{"impact":67,"substance":119,"depth":120,"authority":18,"freshness":121,"relevant":20,"comment":122},18,14,7,"农行发布农业AI场景应用名单，覆盖全产业链，具行业示范意义，但细节有限。",[124],{"name":115,"url":113},[25,27,126,127,128],"数字金融","农业银行","普惠金融",{"code":130,"slug":131,"name":132,"path":133,"parent_code":8},"E","food-supply","农产品加工与流通","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffood-supply",[],{"status":136,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":137},"partial",{"candidates":138,"agricultural_evidence":48,"reason":183},[139,143,150,157,164,170,174,179],{"code":39,"score":18,"supported":48,"title":140,"abstract":141,"tags":142},[25],[25],[25],{"code":144,"score":56,"supported":48,"title":145,"abstract":146,"tags":149},"C",[],[147,148],"畜牧","畜禽",[],{"code":151,"score":56,"supported":48,"title":152,"abstract":153,"tags":156},"D",[],[154,155],"水产","渔业",[],{"code":158,"score":159,"supported":48,"title":160,"abstract":161,"tags":163},"E1",3,[],[162],"农产品加工",[],{"code":165,"score":159,"supported":48,"title":166,"abstract":167,"tags":169},"E4",[],[168],"农产品质量",[],{"code":78,"score":159,"supported":48,"title":171,"abstract":172,"tags":173},[],[91],[],{"code":175,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":176,"abstract":177,"tags":178},"G3",[],[],[126],{"code":44,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":180,"abstract":181,"tags":182},[],[],[27],"一级领域明确，二级方向需要细分",[185,186],"农业人工智能 农业银行 数字金融 普惠金融","农业人工智能 农业银行","农业人工智能农业银行数字金融普惠金融-922","2026-08-25T00:03:26.671160Z",{"id":190,"title":191,"url":192,"summary":193,"summary_zh":194,"content":8,"source_name":195,"source_url":192,"published_at":196,"category":197,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":198,"score_detail":199,"sources":202,"tags":204,"primary_topic":208,"secondary_topics":214,"classification":220,"search_phrases":237,"slug":240,"view_count":241,"doi":242,"paper":243,"created_at":259},5592,"Evaluation of Concept-Rank Collapse Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Low-Label Regimes: An Interpretability Capacity Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Selectivity","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193","Concept-based interpretability methods for plant-disease classifiers are typically evaluated by whether their concept activations correlate with human-annotated labels, but this criterion is silent on a prior question: whether the classifier's internal representation retains enough concept-rank structure for any audit to be informative. the present analysis formalises that prior question as an interpretability capacity bound. A classifier is modelled as a concept-rank operator whose singular values govern how much concept-level signal survives the projection from pixel space to class logits, and a collapse audit is defined as the ratio of retained concept-rank energy to total concept energy. Under a low-label regime, where concept annotations are scarce and the audit must be estimated from few labelled examples, the bound predicts that audit reliability degrades as a function of the concept-rank spectrum and the label budget. The analysis is a theoretical and methodological contribution: it derives the bound, states the conditions under which a collapse audit is identifiable, and characterises the operating characteristics of the audit as a decision procedure under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64). Power was estimated across 2000 design cells for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 52 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The bound reframes concept audits as capacity tests rather than fidelity tests, with consequences for how smallholder fungicide-selectivity decisions should be supported by interpretable disease classifiers.","面向植物病害分类器的基于概念的可解释性方法，通常以其概念激活是否与人工标注标签相关作为评价标准，但该标准对一个更先前的问题保持沉默：分类器的内部表征是否保留了足够的概念秩结构，从而使任何审计具有信息量。本分析将该先前问题形式化为一个可解释性容量上界。分类器被建模为概念秩算子，其奇异值支配着从像素空间到类别logits的投影中概念级信号得以保留的程度，并将坍缩审计定义为保留的概念秩能量与总概念能量之比。在低标签情形下，概念标注稀缺且审计必须由少量标注样本估计，该上界预测审计可靠性会随概念秩谱和标签预算的函数而退化。本分析是一项理论和方法论贡献：推导出该上界，陈述坍缩审计可识别的条件，并在声明的方差结构（簇间SD = 6.0，残差SD = 4.5，组内相关系数 = 0.64）下刻画审计作为决策程序的操作特征。在2000个设计单元中，针对簇数为8、16、24和32以及效应量为3、5和8个百分点的情形估计了功效；在80%功效下达到5个百分点需要52个簇。该上界将概念审计重新框定为容量检验而非保真度检验，并对可解释病害分类器应如何支持小农杀菌剂选择性决策具有启示意义。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","2026-10-21T00:00:00Z","论文",69,{"impact":70,"substance":200,"depth":119,"authority":18,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":201},21,"理论方法论文，提出可解释性容量上界并给出审计功效分析，对智慧农业病害识别可信度有参考价值，但属小众方法学研究、缺乏田间实证，暂不宜进入每日精选。",[203],{"name":195,"url":192},[25,27,205,206,207],"小农户","植物病害识别","可解释性",{"code":209,"slug":210,"name":211,"path":212,"parent_code":213},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[215],{"code":44,"slug":216,"name":217,"path":218,"parent_code":219},"agricultural-ai","农业AI与大模型","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fagricultural-ai","I",{"status":85,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":221},{"candidates":222,"agricultural_evidence":48},[223,228,233],{"code":209,"score":18,"supported":48,"title":224,"abstract":226,"tags":227},[225],"smallholder",[225],[205],{"code":44,"score":13,"supported":48,"title":229,"abstract":231,"tags":232},[230],"computer vision",[],[27,206],{"code":39,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":234,"abstract":235,"tags":236},[],[],[25],[238,239],"农业人工智能 植物病害识别 可解释性 智慧农业","农业人工智能 植物病害识别","农业人工智能植物病害识别可解释性智慧农业-5592",0,"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545193",{"doi":242,"openalex_id":244,"authors":245,"venue":195,"cited_by_count":241,"oa_url":192,"card":252,"direction":256,"ingested_from":258},"W7223137323",[246,248,250],{"name":247,"orcid":8},"Akshay Ramgoolam",{"name":249,"orcid":8},"Priya Bundhoo Appadoo",{"name":251,"orcid":8},"Jean-Noël LEspérance",{"tldr":253,"method":254,"finding":255,"direction":256,"opportunity":257},"提出可解释性容量上界，评估低标签下概念秩崩溃审计的可靠性。","将分类器建模为概念秩算子，推导容量上界并做2000格功效模拟。","审计可靠性随概念秩谱与标签预算下降；5个百分点效应需52个聚类达80%功效。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可将容量上界用于小农户杀菌剂选择性决策的可解释模型审计与标签预算设计。","openalex","2026-10-22T11:21:10.425290Z",{"id":261,"title":262,"url":263,"summary":264,"summary_zh":265,"content":8,"source_name":195,"source_url":263,"published_at":196,"category":197,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":198,"score_detail":266,"sources":269,"tags":271,"primary_topic":275,"secondary_topics":281,"classification":283,"search_phrases":308,"slug":311,"view_count":241,"doi":312,"paper":313,"created_at":325},5591,"Hierarchical Conformal Risk Control for Artificial Intelligence Agriculture Irrigation Scheduling Under Unmodeled Infiltration: A Computer Safety-Guarantee Evaluation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23543665","Irrigation scheduling algorithms that rely on soil-moisture forecasts are vulnerable to unmodeled infiltration, the process by which water bypasses the root zone through preferential pathways that resistance-based soil models cannot represent. The framework is evaluated through a replication-based design study that characterises the operating characteristics of the before-after-control-impact estimator used to audit scheduler performance, under a declared variance structure with between-cluster standard deviation 6.0, residual standard deviation 4.5 and intraclass correlation 0.64. Power was estimated across 2000 design cells spanning cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The analysis indicates that 54 clusters are required to detect a 5-percentage-point effect at 80% power, and that the minimum detectable effect declines steeply as cluster count rises from 8 to 32. The contribution is a formal safety guarantee for irrigation decision support that remains valid when the infiltration model is wrong, together with an audit design that makes the guarantee empirically checkable.","依赖土壤湿度预报的灌溉调度算法容易受到未建模入渗的影响，即水分通过优先路径绕过根区的过程，而基于阻力的土壤模型无法表征这一过程。该框架通过一项基于重复的设计研究进行评估，该研究刻画了用于审计调度器性能的前后对照影响估计量的运行特性，其所依据的声明方差结构为：组间标准差6.0、残差标准差4.5、组内相关系数0.64。功效估计覆盖2000个设计单元，涵盖聚类数8、16、24和32以及效应量3、5和8个百分点。分析表明，在80%功效下检测5个百分点效应需要54个聚类，且最小可检测效应随聚类数从8增至32而急剧下降。本文的贡献在于为灌溉决策支持提供了一种正式的安全保证，该保证在入渗模型错误时仍然有效，同时提出了一种使该保证可经实证检验的审计设计。",{"impact":70,"substance":67,"depth":119,"authority":18,"freshness":267,"relevant":20,"comment":268},9,"该研究提出在入渗模型失配条件下仍有效的灌溉决策安全保证框架，并给出可审计的试验设计，方法新颖、结论可靠，但属细分方法学研究，产业影响有限，适合作为专业精选而非头条。",[270],{"name":195,"url":263},[25,27,272,273,274],"灌溉决策","安全保证","试验设计",{"code":276,"slug":277,"name":278,"path":279,"parent_code":280},"H3","irrigation","水资源与灌溉","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Firrigation","H",[282],{"code":44,"slug":216,"name":217,"path":218,"parent_code":219},{"status":85,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":284},{"candidates":285,"agricultural_evidence":48},[286,291,297,304],{"code":276,"score":69,"supported":48,"title":287,"abstract":288,"tags":290},[277],[289,277],"灌溉",[272],{"code":44,"score":18,"supported":48,"title":292,"abstract":294,"tags":296},[293],"artificial intelligence",[295],"decision support",[27],{"code":298,"score":56,"supported":48,"title":299,"abstract":300,"tags":303},"H2",[],[301,302],"土壤","soil",[],{"code":39,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":307},[],[],[25],[309,310],"灌溉调度 安全保证","农业人工智能 安全保证 智慧农业 灌溉决策","灌溉调度安全保证-5591","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23543665",{"doi":312,"openalex_id":314,"authors":315,"venue":195,"cited_by_count":241,"oa_url":263,"card":320,"direction":256,"ingested_from":258},"W7223131205",[316,318],{"name":317,"orcid":8},"Nassima Benkhelifa",{"name":319,"orcid":8},"Yacine Aït Ahmed",{"tldr":321,"method":322,"finding":323,"direction":256,"opportunity":324},"提出分层保形风险控制，为未建模入渗下的灌溉调度提供安全保证。","分层保形风险控制与基于重复设计的BACI审计，2000个设计单元功效分析。","检测5个百分点效应需54个集群，最小可检测效应随集群数增加陡降。","可将保形风险控制扩展到其他未建模扰动下的农业决策安全保证与审计设计。","2026-10-22T11:21:10.283561Z",{"id":327,"title":328,"url":329,"summary":330,"summary_zh":331,"content":8,"source_name":195,"source_url":329,"published_at":196,"category":197,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":332,"score_detail":333,"sources":335,"tags":337,"primary_topic":340,"secondary_topics":341,"classification":343,"search_phrases":358,"slug":361,"view_count":241,"doi":362,"paper":363,"created_at":377},5590,"Evaluation of Concept-Probe Temporal-Stability Audits for Computer Vision Agriculture Disease Classifiers Under Seasonal Phenology Drift: An Interpretability Decay Bound for Smallholder Fungicide Timing","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234","Concept-probe audits are increasingly used to certify that a crop-disease classifier's internal representations track the pathological concepts a smallholder would act on, but a probe certified at one point in the season may silently decouple from those concepts as phenology shifts the visual statistics of the field. the present analysis treats that decoupling as a formal object. It defines a temporal-stability audit as a sequence of concept-probe accuracies measured across defined phenological windows, and it derives an interpretability decay bound: the rate at which probe accuracy can fall before the fungicide-timing decision it is meant to support becomes unreliable. The bound is expressed as a function of the probe's initial margin, the drift in concept prevalence between windows, and the classifier's sensitivity to the drifted features, and it yields a certified audit interval rather than a single-point certificate. The paper then characterises the operating characteristics of the audit design under a declared variance structure, using a replication-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator with between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5 and intraclass correlation = 0.64. Power was estimated across 2000 design cells over cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points; 54 clusters were required for 5 percentage points at 80% power. The contribution is a decision-theoretic account of when a concept-probe certificate expires, and a design rule for scheduling re-audits across the season.","概念探针审计（concept-probe audit）日益被用于验证作物病害分类器的内部表征是否追踪小农户会据以采取行动的病理学概念，但在生长季某一时点获得认证的探针，可能随着物候变化改变田间的视觉统计特征而悄然与这些概念脱钩。本分析将这种脱钩视为一个形式化对象。它将时间稳定性审计（temporal-stability audit）定义为在既定物候窗口内测量的一系列概念探针准确率，并推导出一个可解释性衰减界限（interpretability decay bound）：即探针准确率在其所支持的杀菌剂施用时机决策变得不可靠之前所能下降的速率。该界限表示为探针初始裕度、窗口间概念流行率漂移以及分类器对漂移特征敏感度的函数，并给出一个经认证的审计区间而非单点认证。随后，本文在声明的方差结构下刻画该审计设计的运行特征，采用基于重复的前后对照影响估计量评估，其中组间标准差 = 6.0、残差标准差 = 4.5、组内相关系数 = 0.64。功效在 2000 个设计单元上估计，聚类数取 8、16、24 和 32，效应量取 3、5 和 8 个百分点；在 80% 功效下达到 5 个百分点需要 54 个聚类。本文的贡献在于从决策论角度阐明概念探针认证何时失效，并给出在整个生长季内安排重新审计的设计规则。",70,{"impact":70,"substance":67,"depth":119,"authority":18,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":334},"该论文提出概念探针审计的时序稳定性框架与可解释性衰减界，方法新颖、统计设计扎实，但属小众方法论研究，产业影响有限，适合作为专业精选而非头条。",[336],{"name":195,"url":329},[25,27,205,338,339],"作物病害识别","模型审计",{"code":209,"slug":210,"name":211,"path":212,"parent_code":213},[342],{"code":44,"slug":216,"name":217,"path":218,"parent_code":219},{"status":85,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":344},{"candidates":345,"agricultural_evidence":48},[346,350,354],{"code":209,"score":69,"supported":48,"title":347,"abstract":348,"tags":349},[225],[205,225],[205],{"code":44,"score":13,"supported":48,"title":351,"abstract":352,"tags":353},[230],[],[338,27],{"code":39,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":355,"abstract":356,"tags":357},[],[],[25],[359,360],"概念探针 时序稳定性 作物病害分类器","杀菌剂 施药时机 可解释性衰减","概念探针时序稳定性作物病害分类器-5590","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23545234",{"doi":362,"openalex_id":364,"authors":365,"venue":195,"cited_by_count":241,"oa_url":329,"card":372,"direction":256,"ingested_from":258},"W7223088030",[366,368,370],{"name":367,"orcid":8},"Abdi-Basid Idriss Farah",{"name":369,"orcid":8},"Amina Abdillahi Guedi",{"name":371,"orcid":8},"Moussa Omar Youssouf",{"tldr":373,"method":374,"finding":375,"direction":256,"opportunity":376},"提出概念探针时间稳定性审计与可解释性衰减界，判断何时需重新审计。","定义跨物候窗口探针精度序列，推导衰减界，用BACI复制评估统计功效。","5个百分点效应需54个聚类达80%功效，审计证书会随物候漂移过期。","可将衰减界与再审计调度规则嵌入小农户杀菌剂时机决策支持系统，并验证跨作物泛化。","2026-10-22T11:21:08.978348Z",{"id":379,"title":380,"url":381,"summary":382,"summary_zh":383,"content":8,"source_name":195,"source_url":381,"published_at":196,"category":197,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":384,"score_detail":385,"sources":387,"tags":389,"primary_topic":392,"secondary_topics":393,"classification":394,"search_phrases":412,"slug":415,"view_count":241,"doi":416,"paper":417,"created_at":427},5589,"Conformal-Risk Evaluation for Artificial Intelligence Agriculture Spray-Nozzle Fault Detection Under Label-Delay Feedback: A Computer Coverage Audit","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23544107","Spray-nozzle fault detection in precision agriculture is a classification problem in which the label that confirms a fault arrives after the spray pass, so the detector must act on unlabelled evidence and its error rate must be certified before the label exists. Conformal prediction offers distribution-free coverage guarantees, but the guarantee is stated for exchangeable calibration and test data, an assumption that label-delayed feedback violates because the calibration set is always older than the deployment set. the present analysis formalises label-delay feedback as a distribution shift in the conformity score and derives a coverage bound for split-conformal fault detectors under that shift. The bound separates the nominal miscoverage rate into an exchangeable component and a delay-induced component that scales with the total variation distance between the calibration and deployment score distributions. A replication-based evaluation of the ['Intercept', 'exposure', 'group', 'severity'] estimator was conducted: 600 data sets of N = 500 were drawn from a declared data-generating process (intercept 12.0, exposure 0.42, group -3.1, severity 1.35, error SD 4.2), and the study characterises the behaviour of the ordinary least squares estimator under the stated process. The estimator recovered the declared coefficients with estimated bias 0.01122 for the intercept and -0.0002 for exposure, root mean squared error 0.9217 and 0.01614 respectively, and empirical coverage of the nominal 95% intervals of 1.0 for both parameters across 600 replications. The coverage audit shows that the delay-induced term, not the exchangeable term, dominates the risk of a conformal spray-nozzle detector, and that the audit procedure can certify a detector before field labels return.","在精准农业中，喷雾喷嘴故障检测是一个分类问题，其中确认故障的标签在喷雾作业结束后才到达，因此检测器必须基于未标记的证据采取行动，并且其错误率必须在标签存在之前得到认证。保形预测（conformal prediction）提供了无分布覆盖保证，但该保证是针对可交换的校准数据和测试数据而言的，而标签延迟反馈违反了这一假设，因为校准集总是比部署集更旧。本分析将标签延迟反馈形式化为一致性分数中的分布偏移，并推导了在该偏移下分裂保形故障检测器的覆盖界。该界将名义错误覆盖 rate 分解为可交换分量和延迟诱导分量，后者随校准与部署分数分布之间的全变差距离而缩放。对 ['Intercept', 'exposure', 'group', 'severity'] 估计器进行了基于重复的评估：从声明的数据生成过程（截距 12.0，暴露 0.42，分组 -3.1，严重程度 1.35，误差标准差 4.2）中抽取了 600 个 N = 500 的数据集，研究刻画了普通最小二乘估计器在所述过程下的行为。该估计器恢复了声明的系数，截距的估计偏差为 0.01122，暴露为 -0.0002，均方根误差分别为 0.9217 和 0.01614，两个参数在 600 次重复中名义 95% 区间的经验覆盖率为 1.0。覆盖审计表明，延迟诱导项而非可交换项主导了保形喷雾喷嘴检测器的风险，并且该审计程序可以在田间标签返回之前对检测器进行认证。",62,{"impact":70,"substance":119,"depth":68,"authority":267,"freshness":13,"relevant":20,"comment":386},"论文提出标签延迟下共形预测覆盖界，方法有新意但属预印本、应用面窄，可作为专业补充而非每日精选头条。",[388],{"name":195,"url":381},[25,27,390,391],"精准施药","病虫害监测",{"code":44,"slug":216,"name":217,"path":218,"parent_code":219},[],{"status":85,"locked":14,"version":34,"method":35,"evidence":395},{"candidates":396,"agricultural_evidence":48},[397,401,407],{"code":44,"score":267,"supported":48,"title":398,"abstract":399,"tags":400},[293],[],[27],{"code":39,"score":121,"supported":48,"title":402,"abstract":403,"tags":406},[],[404,405],"精准农业","precision agriculture",[25],{"code":408,"score":20,"supported":14,"title":409,"abstract":410,"tags":411},"F4",[],[],[390],[413,414],"农业人工智能 病虫害监测 智慧农业 精准施药","农业人工智能 病虫害监测","农业人工智能病虫害监测智慧农业精准施药-5589","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23544107",{"doi":416,"openalex_id":418,"authors":419,"venue":195,"cited_by_count":241,"oa_url":381,"card":422,"direction":256,"ingested_from":258},"W7223116087",[420],{"name":421,"orcid":8},"Achieng' Atim Okello",{"tldr":423,"method":424,"finding":425,"direction":256,"opportunity":426},"将标签延迟反馈建模为共形分数分布偏移，推导覆盖率界并审计喷雾喷嘴故障检测器。","分裂共形预测、总变差距离、600次重复模拟（N=500）评估OLS估计。","延迟诱导项而非可交换项主导检测器风险，审计可在田间标签返回前认证检测器。","可将该覆盖率审计框架扩展到其他标签延迟的农业传感器故障检测，并研究延迟分布估计误差对认证的影响。","2026-10-22T11:21:02.845718Z"]