[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-5024":3,"related-5024":52},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":8,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":24,"tags":26,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":32,"classification":33,"search_phrases":46,"slug":49,"view_count":50,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":51},5024,"农业农村部公布中国首个布氏鲸重要栖息地","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.moa.gov.cn\u002Fxw\u002Fzwdt\u002F202610\u002Ft20261013_6488541.htm","日前,农业农村部发布公告,设立广西北海涠洲岛布氏鲸重要栖息地,海域面积335.43平方公里,每年禁渔8.5个月(12月至次年4月专项禁渔,叠加5月1日至8月16日南海伏季休渔)。布氏鲸为国家一级保护野生动物,首个布氏鲸栖息地的正式公布填补了我国近海大型鲸类栖息生境保护的空白。自2018年监测以来,涠洲岛海域已累计识别超过70头个体,形成结构稳定、活动规律清晰的野生种群。农业农村部将加强观察监测、应急救护等科学研究,从严管控各类人类活动,规范观鲸旅游,严厉打击危害鲸类生存的违法行为。",null,"本网讯　日前，农业农村部发布公告，设立广西北海涠洲岛布氏鲸重要栖息地，海域面积335.43平方公里，每年禁渔8.5个月（每年12月至次年4月专项禁渔，叠加每年5月1日至8月16日南海伏季休渔）。首个布氏鲸栖息地的正式公布，填补了我国近海大型鲸类栖息生境保护的空白，将为维护海洋生物多样性、保护海洋渔业生态环境发挥积极作用。\n\n布氏鲸是全球洄游性海洋物种，为国家一级保护野生动物，一生大致历经幼鲸、亚成体、成体、老年四个生长阶段。每年12月至次年4月，我国北海涠洲岛海域饵料丰富、生境优良，大批布氏鲸洄游至该海域觅食栖息、生长发育、迁徙停歇。此次划设布氏鲸重要栖息地，配套实施禁渔期制度，对保障个体存活、维系种群可持续发展、开展全球布氏鲸协同保护具有重要作用。同时，能够进一步强化栖息生境的专项保护，有效降低渔业作业、船舶航行、观鲸旅游等人为活动带来的干扰，推动实现人与自然和谐共生。自2018年监测以来，涠洲岛海域已累计识别超过70头个体，形成结构稳定、活动规律清晰的野生种群，成为我国极具代表性的海洋生态名片。\n\n下一步，农业农村部将深入贯彻习近平生态文明思想，统筹渔业高质量发展和海洋生态高水平保护，与广西壮族自治区一道，一方面加强观察监测、应急救护等科学研究，一方面从严管控各类人类活动，规范观鲸旅游，严厉打击危害鲸类生存的违法行为，以最严格制度、最严密法治守护鲸类栖息环境安全，让布氏鲸在中国海域生生不息，为全球物种多样性保护贡献中国力量。","农业农村部新闻办公室 2026 年 10 月 13 日","2026-10-13T06:05:00Z","政策",10,false,87,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":19,"authority":20,"freshness":21,"relevant":22,"comment":23},26,22,17,15,7,1,"全国首个布氏鲸重要栖息地公告，含海域面积与禁渔时长等硬指标，政策层级高、信息增量足，值得进入每日精选。",[25],{"name":10,"url":6},[27,28,29,30,31],"生物多样性","布氏鲸","重要栖息地","海洋生态保护","禁渔期制度",[],{"status":34,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":37},"unclassified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":38,"agricultural_evidence":44,"reason":45},[39],{"code":40,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":41,"abstract":42,"tags":43},"H6",[],[],[27],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[47,48],"涠洲岛 布氏鲸 栖息地","农业农村部 布氏鲸 禁渔","涠洲岛布氏鲸栖息地-5024",0,"2026-10-16T00:13:02.493534Z",{"total":53,"page":22,"page_size":53,"items":54},6,[55,128,215,267,318,410],{"id":56,"title":57,"url":58,"summary":59,"summary_zh":8,"content":60,"source_name":61,"source_url":8,"published_at":62,"category":63,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":64,"score_detail":65,"sources":70,"tags":72,"primary_topic":77,"secondary_topics":83,"classification":90,"search_phrases":123,"slug":126,"view_count":50,"doi":8,"paper":8,"created_at":127},5281,"省农科院植保所江油武都\"三水\"绿色融合样板田连续10余年综合治理 稻鱼鸭共生","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.toutiao.com\u002Farticle\u002F7696132538393215528","10月12日江油市武都镇阳亭坝金黄稻田迎来丰收,四川省农科院植保所研究员姬红丽蹲在田埂查叶背(无病斑),亩产干谷不低于1300斤;自2013年起省农科院植保所在此实施\"农田有害生物综合治理课题\"持续10余年,通过田埂种植甜荞、蔷薇、紫云英、二月兰、香根草等蜜源植物为天敌提供庇护所,基地稻田麦田天敌种群数量达农户常规田块的10倍以上。","视频加载中...\n\n川观新闻记者 张彧希 四川农村日报记者 徐灿红 洪瑜\n\n10月12日，江油市武都镇阳亭坝，秋风掠过，稻田翻起金色波浪。\n\n四川省农业科学院植物保护研究所研究员姬红丽蹲在田埂上，拔起一株水稻查看叶背——干干净净，没有病斑。“亩产干谷不会低于1300斤。”再过一两天，这里就要开镰。\n\n这片稻田不普通。自2013年起，省农科院植保所在此实施“农田有害生物综合治理课题”，持续10余年。曾经抛荒的土地，如今稻穗丰盈、游鱼戏水、白鹭翩跹，成为国内率先实现水稻、水产、水禽“三水”绿色融合的样板田。\n\n曾经令人头痛的有害生物，是如何被“赶出”这片田的？\n\n![Image 1](https:\u002F\u002Fp3-sign.toutiaoimg.com\u002Ftos-cn-i-axegupay5k\u002F0236314001894642bb5bcf371554180b~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1792973320&x-signature=XhegSE7aGrMWXTC4o0zuZt8sDFo%3D)\n俯瞰基地。\n\n**第一招：良种打底，病害止步田外**\n\n“三水”融合，第一关是选品种。“不光看产量和米质，更看重抗病性。”姬红丽说。西南稻区主要病害有稻瘟病、纹枯病、稻曲病，农户常规靠打药防病，但基地全生育期几乎不施化学杀菌剂，底气来自多抗性品种。\n\n连续十多年，团队每年从市场主流品种中筛选多抗性优异品种，在江油基地展示。“江油气候利于多种病害发生，对品种抗性要求更高，也更容易筛出好品种。”姬红丽说。\n\n今年基地集中示范川康优2115、品香优607等优质水稻，在稻瘟、稻曲等病害抗性上表现优异。品种自身抗性强，病害起不来，化学农药自然省了。\n\n品种抗性究竟如何？种子企业也很关心。四川金色绿丹种业有限公司川北区域经理陈胜龙沿试验田看了几遍：“没找到稻瘟病、稻曲病症状，叶片干净，秆壮穗大，产量很乐观。”\n\n**第二招：田埂布阵，天敌与“陷阱”控虫**\n\n![Image 2](https:\u002F\u002Fp3-sign.toutiaoimg.com\u002Ftos-cn-i-tjoges91tu\u002Facfcb249e48cd472f480260e5551bb65~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1792973320&x-signature=B1pojs4Mx2mcaw2GJlWWImuIBDk%3D)\n田埂上种的甜荞。\n\n病害靠品种扛，虫害靠天敌控。不足半米宽的田埂，像一座迷你花园：甜荞开白花，蔷薇正艳，菜粉蝶、蜜蜂穿梭其间。\n\n![Image 3](https:\u002F\u002Fp3-sign.toutiaoimg.com\u002Ftos-cn-i-tjoges91tu\u002F85a45dc6b1fa07d071fd5c3d1578c4f2~tplv-tt-origin-web:gif.jpeg?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1792973320&x-signature=oCp5UghEu2I%2BkG6F5S36WgQDGUA%3D)\n田埂上种的蔷薇。\n\n“这些都是蜜源植物，是精心选的‘生态卫士’。”姬红丽说。稻麦轮作茬口期，田里没有庄稼，自然天敌没处安身，蜜源植物便补上空当，提供花粉、花蜜和庇护所。\n\n目前田埂还种了紫云英、二月兰，基地稻田麦田里的天敌种群数量，达到农户常规自防田块的10倍以上，全是自然天敌，没有人工投放。\n\n记者发现，田埂上还种着一人高的香根草。姬红丽介绍，这是从泰国引进的“陷阱植物”：气味吸引二化螟产卵，但含有毒活性物质，不适合幼虫发育，孵化幼虫大多低龄死亡，无法发育为成虫。一代代下来，基地二化螟数量越来越低。\n\n效果有数据支撑：水稻螟虫、麦蚜虫连续八年没达到化学防治用药阈值；蜘蛛、青蛙、田螺、泥鳅、黄鳝、蛇、野鸭、翠鸟等指示生物相继回归，并向周边农田扩散。“插秧时，当地村民都来抓黄鳝，知道我们不用药，黄鳝比别处多。”姬红丽笑着说。\n\n**第三招：生态当家，少打药照样高产**\n\n开农资店的罗勇，生意不如以前，但他却为啥挺开心？\n\n罗勇原是当地农资店主，卖农药化肥。“那会儿种植户见虫就打药，我生意也好。”但姬红丽团队来了之后，带来一个新理念：生态当家，少打药照样高产。\n\n“一开始我不信。”姬红丽团队带着罗勇一次次下田示范，请他到基地看效果。“后来发现人家不打药，虫子比我的还少，稻子还壮。”\n\n罗勇动了心，一边开农资店，一边承包土地。如今种植已发展到400多亩。“跟着团队学病虫害防治，品种从他们筛出的抗病品种里选，少打药减少人工，一亩地省100多块钱，产量基本不受影响。”他估计，今年亩产干谷能到1300至1400斤，在武都镇算高的。\n\n自己尝到甜头，罗勇又向周边大户推广：“少打药不是不管，是要靠品种抗病、靠天敌控虫。”如今，武都镇大户基本减少了打药次数，但产量没降。","今日头条川观新闻(2026-10-13)","2026-10-13T00:00:00Z","报道",69,{"impact":66,"substance":67,"depth":19,"authority":13,"freshness":68,"relevant":22,"comment":69},18,20,4,"连续十余年综合治理的实证报道，数据与多方信源扎实，具行业示范价值，但时效偏旧。",[71],{"name":61,"url":58},[73,74,27,75,76],"绿色防控","农药减量","生态农业","稻鱼鸭共生",{"code":78,"slug":79,"name":80,"path":81,"parent_code":82},"D3","integrated-aquaculture","稻渔种养与生态渔业","\u002Ftopic\u002Faquaculture\u002Fintegrated-aquaculture","D",[84],{"code":85,"slug":86,"name":87,"path":88,"parent_code":89},"F4","crop-protection","农药与绿色防控","\u002Ftopic\u002Finputs-equipment\u002Fcrop-protection","F",{"status":91,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":92},"classified",{"candidates":93,"agricultural_evidence":44},[94,100,106,113,119],{"code":85,"score":95,"supported":44,"title":96,"abstract":98,"tags":99},13,[97],"植保",[97],[74,73],{"code":78,"score":101,"supported":44,"title":102,"abstract":104,"tags":105},8,[103],"稻鱼",[],[],{"code":107,"score":108,"supported":44,"title":109,"abstract":110,"tags":112},"A1",3,[],[111],"稻田",[],{"code":114,"score":115,"supported":14,"title":116,"abstract":117,"tags":118},"H8",2,[],[],[75,73],{"code":40,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":120,"abstract":121,"tags":122},[],[],[27],[124,125],"四川省农科院 植保所 江油 稻鱼鸭","三水融合 绿色防控 样板田","四川省农科院植保所江油稻鱼鸭-5281","2026-10-19T00:07:41.376347Z",{"id":129,"title":130,"url":131,"summary":132,"summary_zh":133,"content":8,"source_name":134,"source_url":131,"published_at":135,"category":136,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":137,"score_detail":138,"sources":142,"tags":144,"primary_topic":149,"secondary_topics":154,"classification":160,"search_phrases":184,"slug":187,"view_count":22,"doi":188,"paper":189,"created_at":214},5163,"Ecological indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem responses to climate change in agroecology and nature-based solutions: a scoping review","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685","Climate change reshapes biodiversity patterns and ecosystem processes across scales. However, ecological indicators used to track these changes remain uneven in structure and application. This study maps and synthesizes indicators applied in agroecology and nature-based solutions (NbS) for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem responses under climate change. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering literature from 2003 to 2026. From a final dataset of 89 sources, data were extracted through a structured coding framework and synthesized using an Indicator–Scale–Response matrix and an Indicator Application Index. Findings show shared reliance on indicators such as species diversity, ecosystem productivity, carbon dynamics, ecosystem services, and resilience. Differences emerge in how these indicators are applied. Agroecology prioritizes process-based and field-level measurements grounded in local ecological interactions, while NbS emphasizes standardized and scalable metrics linked to monitoring and reporting systems. Cross-scale integration remains uneven, particularly in connecting species-level responses with ecosystem and landscape indicators. Remote sensing and Essential Biodiversity Variables provide emerging pathways for linking scales, though field integration remains partial. Results point to fragmented indicator systems that limit coherent ecological assessment across management contexts. Strengthening alignment between field observations and scalable monitoring approaches could improve comparability and usability of ecological indicators for climate adaptation and ecosystem management in agricultural landscapes.","气候变化重塑了跨尺度的生物多样性模式与生态系统过程。然而，用于追踪这些变化的生态指标在结构和应用上仍不均衡。本研究梳理并综合了农业生态学与基于自然的解决方案（NbS）中用于评估气候变化下生物多样性与生态系统响应的指标。采用PRISMA-ScR指南开展范围综述，检索Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar，覆盖2003年至2026年的文献。从最终89篇文献构成的数据集中，通过结构化编码框架提取数据，并运用“指标—尺度—响应”矩阵和指标应用指数进行综合。研究结果表明，各领域共同依赖物种多样性、生态系统生产力、碳动态、生态系统服务和恢复力等指标，但在指标应用方式上存在差异。农业生态学侧重于基于过程和田块尺度的测量，根植于地方生态相互作用；而NbS强调与监测和报告体系相关联的标准化、可扩展的度量指标。跨尺度整合仍不均衡，尤其是在将物种层面响应与生态系统及景观指标相衔接方面。遥感与基本生物多样性变量（Essential Biodiversity Variables）为连接尺度提供了新兴路径，但野外观测的整合仍不充分。研究结果揭示出指标体系的碎片化，限制了跨管理情境下一致的生态评估。加强野外观测与可扩展监测方法之间的衔接，有望提升生态指标在农业景观气候适应与生态系统管理中的可比性和可用性。","Ecological Indicators","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z","论文",64,{"impact":101,"substance":66,"depth":139,"authority":95,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":141},16,9,"该综述系统梳理了农业生态学与NbS中生物多样性及生态系统响应的指标，方法规范、结论有参考价值，但属学术综述，产业与政策影响有限，适合作为专业资讯而非每日精选头条。",[143],{"name":134,"url":131},[145,27,146,147,148],"气候变化","农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案","生态指标",{"code":40,"slug":150,"name":151,"path":152,"parent_code":153},"biodiversity","生态保护与生物多样性","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fbiodiversity","H",[155],{"code":156,"slug":157,"name":158,"path":159,"parent_code":153},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate",{"status":91,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":161},{"candidates":162,"agricultural_evidence":44},[163,171,177],{"code":40,"score":164,"supported":44,"title":165,"abstract":167,"tags":170},27,[150,166],"agroecology",[27,168,169,150,166],"农业生态","生态系统服务",[146,27],{"code":156,"score":66,"supported":44,"title":172,"abstract":174,"tags":176},[173],"climate change",[145,175,173],"气候适应",[145],{"code":178,"score":53,"supported":44,"title":179,"abstract":180,"tags":183},"I3",[],[181,182],"遥感","remote sensing",[],[185,186],"基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学 生物多样性 气候变化","基于自然的解决方案 农业生态学","基于自然的解决方案农业生态学生物多样性气候变化-5163","10.1016\u002Fj.ecolind.2026.115685",{"doi":188,"openalex_id":190,"authors":191,"venue":134,"cited_by_count":50,"oa_url":131,"card":206,"direction":212,"ingested_from":213},"W7222588017",[192,195,198,201,203],{"name":193,"orcid":194},"Eliakira Kisetu Nassary","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-7327-4366",{"name":196,"orcid":197},"Mawazo Jamson Shitindi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5579-902X",{"name":199,"orcid":200},"Aneth Japhet Magubika","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0001-8910-1953",{"name":202,"orcid":8},"Esta Alfred Mhagama",{"name":204,"orcid":205},"Newton Lwiyiso Kilasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4721-7691",{"tldr":207,"method":208,"finding":209,"direction":210,"opportunity":211},"综述农业生态与NbS中生物多样性和生态系统气候响应指标的应用差异。","PRISMA-ScR范围综述，检索2003-2026年89篇文献，构建指标-尺度","两类领域指标依赖相似但应用分化，跨尺度整合不足，指标系统碎片化。","农业绿色发展与碳","可研究田间观测与遥感EBV衔接的跨尺度指标框架，提升农业景观气候适应评估可比性。","农业遥感与作物表型","openalex","2026-10-17T23:30:28.181936Z",{"id":216,"title":217,"url":218,"summary":219,"summary_zh":220,"content":8,"source_name":221,"source_url":218,"published_at":222,"category":136,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":223,"score_detail":224,"sources":227,"tags":229,"primary_topic":234,"secondary_topics":235,"classification":236,"search_phrases":247,"slug":250,"view_count":50,"doi":251,"paper":252,"created_at":266},4821,"Producing a Red List of Ecosystems for the Brazilian Cerrado","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1111\u002Fcsp2.70426","Abstract Land clearance is a key driver of biodiversity loss. This is a particular challenge in the Brazilian Cerrado, the world's most biodiverse savanna biome and a region experiencing a rapid expansion of agriculture. To inform habitat conservation and restoration actions, we used the Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) framework to identify threatened ecosystems within the Cerrado. This biome is divided into 20 ecoregions, and we subdivided each ecoregion into forest, savanna, grassland, and wetland ecosystems. We used remote sensing data from 1985 to 2020 to measure and predict the distribution of each ecosystem and assess its risk of collapse based on Criterion A2b (reduction in geographic distribution over any 50‐year period), Criterion B1 (limited extent of occurrence), and Criterion B2 (limited area of occupancy). Of the 80 ecosystems comprising the Cerrado, we assessed 12 as Endangered and 43 as Vulnerable. Most of these threatened ecosystems were identified under Criterion A2b, while Criterion B identified a smaller subset of spatially restricted ecosystems, particularly wetlands, underscoring the importance of applying more than one criterion in the assessment process. By using the Red List of Ecosystems as an international standard, we provide the first globally comparable analysis of the state of the Cerrado, showing that nearly three‐quarters of the region's ecosystems are at risk of collapse. This information provides a baseline to inform local policy and practice, helping to conserve biodiversity and maintain ecosystem services within this globally important region.","土地开垦是生物多样性丧失的主要驱动因素。这在巴西塞拉多（Cerrado）尤为严峻，该地区拥有全球生物多样性最丰富的稀树草原生物群系，同时正经历农业的快速扩张。为了为栖息地保护和恢复行动提供依据，我们采用生态系统红色名录（Red List of Ecosystems, RLE）框架来识别塞拉多境内受威胁的生态系统。该生物群系被划分为20个生态区，我们又将每个生态区细分为森林、稀树草原、草地和湿地生态系统。我们利用1985年至2020年的遥感数据，测量并预测各生态系统的分布，并基于标准A2b（任意50年期内地理分布范围的缩减）、标准B1（分布范围有限）和标准B2（占据面积有限）评估其崩溃风险。在构成塞拉多的80个生态系统中，我们评估出12个为濒危，43个为易危。这些受威胁的生态系统大多依据标准A2b被识别，而标准B则识别出较少一部分空间受限的生态系统，尤其是湿地，这凸显了在评估过程中应用多项标准的重要性。通过将生态系统红色名录作为国际标准加以运用，我们提供了首个在全球范围内可比较的塞拉多状况分析，表明该地区近四分之三的生态系统面临崩溃风险。这些信息为地方政策和实践提供了基线，有助于在这一具有全球重要性的区域内保护生物多样性并维持生态系统服务。","Conservation Science and Practice","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",81,{"impact":66,"substance":18,"depth":66,"authority":225,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":226},14,"基于1985—2020年遥感数据对巴西塞拉多80个生态系统做红色名录评估，方法规范、数据扎实，对农业扩张与生态保护平衡有参考价值，但属域外研究，国内落地影响有限。",[228],{"name":221,"url":218},[27,230,231,232,233],"遥感监测","农业扩张","草原保护","生态系统评估",{"code":40,"slug":150,"name":151,"path":152,"parent_code":153},[],{"status":91,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":237},{"candidates":238,"agricultural_evidence":44},[239,243],{"code":40,"score":13,"supported":44,"title":240,"abstract":241,"tags":242},[],[27,169,150],[27],{"code":178,"score":21,"supported":44,"title":244,"abstract":245,"tags":246},[],[181,182],[230],[248,249],"巴西塞拉多 生态系统红色名录","塞拉多 遥感 生物多样性","巴西塞拉多生态系统红色名录-4821","10.1111\u002Fcsp2.70426",{"doi":251,"openalex_id":253,"authors":254,"venue":221,"cited_by_count":50,"oa_url":218,"card":261,"direction":212,"ingested_from":213},"W7221517508",[255,258],{"name":256,"orcid":257},"Juliana Ávila Martins","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5465-8276",{"name":259,"orcid":260},"Robert J. Smith","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1599-9171",{"tldr":262,"method":263,"finding":264,"direction":212,"opportunity":265},"用生态系统红色名录框架评估巴西塞拉多80个生态系统的崩溃风险。","基于1985-2020年遥感数据，按A2b、B1、B2标准评估分布与风险。","近四分之三生态系统受威胁，12个濒危、43个易危，湿地等空间受限类型突出。","可结合多源遥感与生态模型，动态监测农业扩张下生态系统风险并支撑保护修复决策。","2026-10-13T23:30:23.689100Z",{"id":268,"title":269,"url":270,"summary":271,"summary_zh":272,"content":8,"source_name":273,"source_url":270,"published_at":274,"category":136,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":275,"score_detail":276,"sources":279,"tags":281,"primary_topic":284,"secondary_topics":285,"classification":286,"search_phrases":297,"slug":300,"view_count":22,"doi":301,"paper":302,"created_at":317},4738,"Natural ecosystem loss in an Atlantic Forest agricultural basin: drivers of land-use change and future landscape trajectories","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1912707","The Atlantic Forest, one of the world's most threatened biodiversity hotspots, faces intense pressure from agricultural expansion and inadequate land governance. Understanding the spatial drivers and future trajectories of land-use and land cover (LULC) change is critical for safeguarding the ecosystem services and biodiversity that remnant natural areas provide. This study investigated the relative importance of multiple biophysical, socioeconomic, and demographic drivers of natural ecosystem loss in the Guaporé River Basin (GRB), a 246,300-ha subtropical Atlantic Forest agricultural watershed in southern Brazil. We combined a municipality-level temporal trend analysis to characterize historical LULC dynamics (1998–2019) with the Dinamica EGO cellular automata model, calibrated using Weight of Evidence (WoE), to simulate future landscapes under 2030 and 2050 scenarios. Our results reveal divergent ecological dynamics across the basin. The Northern region experienced extensive remnant vegetation loss (1.55% yr −1 conversion to altered ecosystems), driven by flat terrain and high agricultural productivity, while the Southern region showed partial natural regeneration (1.40% yr −1 transition from altered to regenerating vegetation), linked to steeper slopes and vegetation extraction practices. Despite apparent recovery, closer analysis reveals a regressive process of ecological simplification, in which remnant vegetation is progressively replaced by regenerating vegetation. Future projections suggest that, without strengthened enforcement of Brazil's Natural Vegetation Protection Law, the Northern basin will lose an additional 15,903 ha of remnant vegetation by 2050. These findings highlight critical spatial mismatches between legal protection frameworks and actual land-use pressures, with direct implications for conservation planning, watershed management, and biodiversity protection in the Atlantic Forest biome.","大西洋森林是全球受威胁最严重的生物多样性热点地区之一，面临着农业扩张和土地治理不足带来的巨大压力。理解土地利用与土地覆盖（LULC）变化的空间驱动因素及未来演变趋势，对于维护残余自然区域所提供的生态系统服务和生物多样性至关重要。本研究考察了巴西南部瓜波雷河流域（GRB）自然生态系统丧失的多个生物物理、社会经济和人口驱动因素的相对重要性。该流域面积246,300公顷，属亚热带大西洋森林农业流域。我们将市级时间趋势分析（用于刻画1998—2019年历史LULC动态）与Dinamica EGO元胞自动机模型相结合，并采用证据权重法（WoE）进行校准，以模拟2030年和2050年情景下的未来景观。研究结果揭示了流域内差异化的生态动态。北部地区经历了大面积的残余植被丧失（年转化率1.55%，转为改变后的生态系统），其驱动因素为平坦地形和高农业生产力；而南部地区则表现出部分自然再生（年转化率1.40%，从改变后的生态系统转为再生植被），与较陡的坡度和植被采伐活动相关。尽管表面上呈现恢复态势，进一步分析却揭示了一个退行性的生态简化过程，即残余植被正逐步被再生植被所取代。未来预测表明，若不加紧执行巴西《自然植被保护法》，到2050年北部流域将再丧失15,903公顷残余植被。这些发现凸显了法律保护框架与实际土地利用压力之间的关键空间错配，对大西洋森林生物群系的保护规划、流域管理和生物多样性保护具有直接影响。","Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-11T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":277,"substance":18,"depth":66,"authority":225,"freshness":140,"relevant":22,"comment":278},12,"基于元胞自动机与证据权重的巴西大西洋森林流域土地利用模拟研究，方法扎实、结论具体，但属区域案例，公共影响有限。",[280],{"name":273,"url":270},[168,27,230,282,283],"土地利用变化","流域治理",{"code":40,"slug":150,"name":151,"path":152,"parent_code":153},[],{"status":91,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":287},{"candidates":288,"agricultural_evidence":44},[289,293],{"code":40,"score":277,"supported":44,"title":290,"abstract":291,"tags":292},[],[27,169,150],[168,282,27],{"code":178,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":294,"abstract":295,"tags":296},[],[],[230],[298,299],"Guaporé River Basin 土地利用","Atlantic Forest 农业流域 模拟","GuaporéRiverBasin土地利用-4738","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1912707",{"doi":301,"openalex_id":303,"authors":304,"venue":273,"cited_by_count":50,"oa_url":270,"card":312,"direction":212,"ingested_from":213},"W7221477243",[305,308,310],{"name":306,"orcid":307},"Edberto Moura Lima","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8447-8460",{"name":309,"orcid":8},"Bano Mehdi-Schulz",{"name":311,"orcid":8},"Jose Miguel Reichert",{"tldr":313,"method":314,"finding":315,"direction":212,"opportunity":316},"结合趋势分析与元胞自动机模拟巴西大西洋森林农业流域土地利用变化及未来情景。","Dinamica EGO元胞自动机+证据权重法，1998–2019年市级LULC","北部残存植被持续丧失，南部看似恢复实为生态简化，2050年北部将再失1.59万公顷。","可引入遥感时序与多尺度治理数据，量化法律保护与实际压力错配的驱动机制。","2026-10-12T23:30:06.576251Z",{"id":319,"title":320,"url":321,"summary":322,"summary_zh":323,"content":8,"source_name":324,"source_url":321,"published_at":325,"category":136,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":326,"score_detail":327,"sources":330,"tags":332,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":336,"classification":337,"search_phrases":370,"slug":373,"view_count":50,"doi":374,"paper":375,"created_at":409},4674,"Impact assessment of co-management strategies on forest ecosystem in protected areas of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS based analysis","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01052-0","Co-management of Protected Areas (PAs) has emerged as a strategy to make forest restoration and biodiversity conservation more effective by encouraging the active participation of local people. This study analyzed the co-management effects in two protected areas i.e. Dharmapur Shal Forest and Nawabganj National Park in Dinajpur District, Bangladesh. Land use and land cover change were monitored between 1990 and 2022 using Landsat images. The study considered four main categories: forests, encroached areas, barren lands and water bodies. The findings indicated that forest cover diminished in both forests between 1990 and 2003, but experienced a significant recovery by 2022. The expanse of Dharmapur Shal forest diminished from 552.05 hectares in 1990 to 469.95 hectares in 2003, then rising to 550.41 hectares in 2022. While the forest cover in Nawabganj National Park declined from 454.18 hectares to 393.72 hectares, it recovered to 432.36 hectares in 2022, suggesting a positive association between co-management implementation and forest recovery. However, 2023 ground-truth data indicates that while native Shorea robusta remains dominant (60–65% in Dharmapur; 75–80% in Nawabganj), the forest recovery includes a significant component of exotic plantations ( Acacia and Eucalyptus ) established in previously degraded areas. This suggests a shift in forest composition alongside overall increase in canopy cover. Classification accuracy for 2022 was assessed using a confusion matrix against 120 ground-truth points, achieving an overall accuracy of 86.67% (Kappa = 0.82). Producer's and user's accuracies ranged from 78.57 to 93.33%, with the primary confusion observed between Barren Land and Encroached Area classes. Barren land initially increased and decreased in both areas, while water bodies remained relatively stable. Ecosystem service values (ESVs) related to carbon sequestration, biodiversity and water regulation also improved, based on global valuation coefficients rather than site-specific estimates. Stakeholder perception analysis, including forest officials and local communities, revealed strong support for co-management, citing enhanced forest cover, increased native species and reduced illegal extraction. However, challenges remain in achieving historical biodiversity levels. This study highlights the potential of co-management in forest restoration and sustainable land governance in developing countries and provides evidence-based insights to inform future policy and planning.","保护区（Protected Areas, PAs）共管已成为一种策略，通过鼓励当地民众积极参与，使森林恢复和生物多样性保护更加有效。本研究分析了孟加拉国迪纳杰布尔县两个保护区的共管效果，即达尔马普尔娑罗林和纳瓦布根杰国家公园。利用Landsat影像监测了1990年至2022年间的土地利用与土地覆盖变化。研究考虑了四个主要类别：森林、侵占区、裸地和水体。研究结果表明，1990年至2003年间，两处森林的森林覆盖均有所减少，但到2022年经历了显著恢复。达尔马普尔娑罗林面积从1990年的552.05公顷减少至2003年的469.95公顷，随后在2022年增至550.41公顷。纳瓦布根杰国家公园的森林覆盖从454.18公顷下降至393.72公顷，但在2022年恢复至432.36公顷，表明共管实施与森林恢复之间存在正相关关系。然而，2023年地面实况数据表明，尽管本地娑罗双树（Shorea robusta）仍占主导地位（达尔马普尔为60–65%；纳瓦布根杰为75–80%），但森林恢复中包含了大量在先前退化区域建立的外来人工林（金合欢属和桉属）。这表明森林组成发生了转变，同时冠层覆盖总体增加。利用混淆矩阵对2022年分类精度进行了评估，以120个地面实况点为参照，总体精度达到86.67%（Kappa = 0.82）。生产者精度和用户精度范围为78.57%至93.33%，主要混淆出现在裸地和侵占区类别之间。两处区域的裸地均呈现先增后减的趋势，而水体保持相对稳定。基于全球估值系数而非特定地点估算，与碳固存、生物多样性和水资源调节相关的生态系统服务价值（ESVs）也有所改善。利益相关者感知分析（包括林业官员和当地社区）显示，各方对共管给予强烈支持，理由包括森林覆盖增加、本地物种增多以及非法采伐减少。然而，在达到历史生物多样性水平方面仍存在挑战。本研究凸显了共管在发展中国家森林恢复和可持续土地治理中的潜力，并提供了基于证据的见解，以期为未来","Discover Environment","2026-10-09T00:00:00Z",71,{"impact":277,"substance":328,"depth":19,"authority":95,"freshness":101,"relevant":22,"comment":329},21,"基于Landsat遥感与GIS的孟加拉国保护区共管成效评估，方法规范、数据翔实，对发展中国家森林治理有参考价值，但与国内三农及农业信息化直接关联较弱。",[331],{"name":324,"url":321},[27,230,333,334,335],"土地利用","森林保护","社区共管",[],{"status":338,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":339},"needs_review",{"candidates":340,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":369},[341,347,351,357,363],{"code":40,"score":342,"supported":44,"title":343,"abstract":344,"tags":346},11,[],[27,169,150,345],"ecosystem service",[333,27],{"code":178,"score":140,"supported":44,"title":348,"abstract":349,"tags":350},[182],[],[230],{"code":352,"score":101,"supported":44,"title":353,"abstract":355,"tags":356},"I4",[354],"GIS",[],[],{"code":358,"score":108,"supported":44,"title":359,"abstract":360,"tags":362},"H3",[],[361],"水资源",[],{"code":364,"score":108,"supported":44,"title":365,"abstract":366,"tags":368},"H4",[],[367],"carbon sequestration",[],"农业相关性需要复核",[371,372],"孟加拉国 保护区 森林共管","Landsat 遥感 森林覆盖变化","孟加拉国保护区森林共管-4674","10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01052-0",{"doi":374,"openalex_id":376,"authors":377,"venue":324,"cited_by_count":50,"oa_url":402,"card":403,"direction":408,"ingested_from":213},"W7221074353",[378,380,383,385,388,391,393,395,397,400],{"name":379,"orcid":8},"Md Manik Ali",{"name":381,"orcid":382},"Sudipto Saha Dipto","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6479-9593",{"name":384,"orcid":8},"Md Shafiqul Bari",{"name":386,"orcid":387},"Mahmuod Abubakar Bashir","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6296-8522",{"name":389,"orcid":390},"Nazmin Akter","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-7337-2798",{"name":392,"orcid":8},"Sujan Kumar Shil",{"name":394,"orcid":8},"Md Farid Hasan",{"name":396,"orcid":8},"Md Asif Adnan Prince",{"name":398,"orcid":399},"Muhammad Madnee","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-1362-7473",{"name":401,"orcid":8},"Abdullahi Omar Mohamud","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Fcontent\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1007\u002Fs44274-026-01052-0.pdf",{"tldr":404,"method":405,"finding":406,"direction":212,"opportunity":407},"评估孟加拉国两个保护区共管策略对森林生态的影响，发现森林覆盖先减后增但树种组成改变。","用1990-2022年Landsat影像做土地利用分类，结合地面验证与利益相关者","共管后森林覆盖显著恢复，但恢复中混入大量外来树种，原生生物多样性未完全恢复。","可延伸研究共管政策下外来树种扩张对碳汇与生物多样性的长期权衡，并开发本地化生态服务估值模型。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","2026-10-11T23:30:17.636276Z",{"id":411,"title":412,"url":413,"summary":414,"summary_zh":415,"content":8,"source_name":416,"source_url":413,"published_at":417,"category":136,"cover_url":8,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":50,"score_detail":418,"sources":420,"tags":422,"primary_topic":8,"secondary_topics":424,"classification":425,"search_phrases":447,"slug":450,"view_count":22,"doi":451,"paper":452,"created_at":483},4608,"Hot drought reshapes the relationship between tree species diversity and forest resilience","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1088\u002F1748-9326\u002Faeb1df","Abstract Climate warming is increasing the occurrence of hot droughts, in which water deficits coincide with anomalously high temperatures, posing growing risks to forest ecosystems and carbon sequestration. Yet whether tree species diversity (TSD) affects forest resilience differently under drought-only and hot drought remains unclear. Here, we conducted a global assessment of TSD effects on NDVI-based forest resilience under drought-only and hot drought events. By integrating satellite-based estimates of resilience with global tree species richness data and environmental covariates across ten major forest biomes, we found that global forests exhibited reduced post-drought growth under both drought conditions, with more spatially extensive reductions under hot drought. Importantly, the TSD-resilience relationship differed markedly between them. TSD effects on forest resilience were widely negative under drought-only conditions but became predominantly positive under hot drought. Hot drought also amplified both positive and negative TSD effects relative to drought-only events. Interaction analyses further showed that, under drought-only conditions, TSD effects were broadly modulated by mean annual temperature and vapor pressure deficit, whereas under hot drought, mean annual temperature was the only environmental variable showing widespread modulation of TSD effects. In addition, resilience was more sensitive to the number of tree species under hot drought and in species-poor forests. Our findings highlight that anomalously high temperature accompanying drought reshapes both the direction and magnitude of TSD effects on forest resilience and identify low-richness regions as strategic targets where management interventions may deliver greater ecological benefits.","气候变暖正在增加热干旱的发生频率，即水分亏缺与异常高温同时出现，对森林生态系统和碳汇构成日益增大的风险。然而，树种多样性（TSD）在仅干旱和热干旱条件下对森林恢复力的影响是否不同仍不清楚。在此，我们对TSD在仅干旱和热干旱事件下对基于NDVI的森林恢复力的影响进行了全球评估。通过将基于卫星的恢复力估算与全球树种丰富度数据及十大主要森林生物群系的环境协变量相结合，我们发现全球森林在两种干旱条件下均表现出干旱后生长下降，而热干旱条件下的下降在空间上更为广泛。重要的是，TSD与恢复力之间的关系在两种条件下存在显著差异。在仅干旱条件下，TSD对森林恢复力的影响普遍为负，但在热干旱条件下则主要转为正。与仅干旱事件相比，热干旱还放大了TSD的正负效应。交互作用分析进一步表明，在仅干旱条件下，TSD效应广泛受年均温和饱和水汽压差的调控，而在热干旱条件下，年均温是唯一对TSD效应表现出广泛调控作用的环境变量。此外，恢复力在热干旱条件下以及物种贫乏的森林中对树种数量的敏感性更高。我们的研究结果强调，伴随干旱出现的异常高温重塑了TSD对森林恢复力影响的方向和幅度，并确定低丰富度区域为战略目标区域，在这些区域管理干预可能产生更大的生态效益。","Environmental Research Letters","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",{"impact":50,"substance":50,"depth":50,"authority":50,"freshness":50,"relevant":50,"comment":419},"研究全球森林对热干旱的响应机制，属生态学与气候变化领域，与三农、农业信息化主题无直接关联，不建议进入每日精选。",[421],{"name":416,"url":413},[145,27,230,423],"森林韧性",[],{"status":338,"locked":14,"version":35,"method":36,"evidence":426},{"candidates":427,"agricultural_evidence":14,"reason":369},[428,434,439,443],{"code":156,"score":20,"supported":44,"title":429,"abstract":431,"tags":433},[430],"drought",[432,430],"干旱",[145],{"code":364,"score":53,"supported":44,"title":435,"abstract":436,"tags":438},[],[437,367],"碳汇",[],{"code":40,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":440,"abstract":441,"tags":442},[],[],[27],{"code":178,"score":22,"supported":14,"title":444,"abstract":445,"tags":446},[],[],[230],[448,449],"树木多样性 森林韧性 热干旱","NDVI 森林韧性 遥感","树木多样性森林韧性热干旱-4608","10.1088\u002F1748-9326\u002Faeb1df",{"doi":451,"openalex_id":453,"authors":454,"venue":416,"cited_by_count":50,"oa_url":476,"card":477,"direction":482,"ingested_from":213},"W7155548477",[455,457,460,462,465,467,470,473],{"name":456,"orcid":8},"Zifan Zhang",{"name":458,"orcid":459},"Pei Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-8647-253X",{"name":461,"orcid":8},"Xiuchen Wu",{"name":463,"orcid":464},"Wen Zhang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0003-4431-7026",{"name":466,"orcid":8},"Yang Li",{"name":468,"orcid":469},"Renjie Guo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0963-0047",{"name":471,"orcid":472},"X Y Wang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6891-0711",{"name":474,"orcid":475},"Zekai Meng","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-1137-7996","https:\u002F\u002Fiopscience.iop.org\u002Farticle\u002F10.1088\u002F1748-9326\u002Faeb1df\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":478,"method":479,"finding":480,"direction":212,"opportunity":481},"全球评估发现热干旱改变树种多样性对森林恢复力的影响方向，从负向转为正向。","整合卫星NDVI恢复力、全球树种丰富度与环境协变量，分析十大森林生物群系。","热干旱下多样性效应转为正向且被放大，低多样性森林恢复力对物种数更敏感。","可探究热干旱下多样性正向效应的生理机制，并识别低丰富度区域优先保护。","农业人工智能与决策模型","2026-10-10T23:30:51.323833Z"]