[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-5143":3,"related-5143":104},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":31,"secondary_topics":37,"classification":38,"search_phrases":77,"slug":80,"view_count":81,"doi":82,"paper":83,"created_at":103},5143,"Crop diversification as a climate-smart agriculture strategy and household welfare in Nigeria: evidence from living standard measurement survey","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1957540","Crop diversification is a climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practice with well-documented yield and agroecological benefits, but rigorous, nationally representative evidence on its welfare impacts in Nigeria remains scarce. This study examined the determinants and welfare effects of crop diversification adoption among 3,229 farm households, using the fourth wave of Nigeria’s Living Standard Measurement Study – Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA). A probit model identified the determinants of adoption, and an endogenous switching regression (ESR) model, which corrects for selection bias arising from observed and unobserved heterogeneity, estimated the causal impact of adoption on household per capita consumption expenditure and dietary diversity. About 1,846 households (57%) adopted crop diversification. Household size, farm size, age of household head, distance to road, fertilizer use, and temperature exposure significantly increased the probability of adoption, while education, distance to market, access to finance, and rainfall shock significantly reduced it. Adoption increased per capita consumption expenditure by an average treatment effect of 0.72 log points and household dietary diversity scores by 2.03 points among adopters, effects that are large relative to national poverty and dietary diversity benchmarks. These results indicate that limited market access, credit products tied to specialized cropping, and climate shocks jointly suppress adoption. Government agricultural and nutrition agencies should jointly fund a targeted program that redesigns credit products to support diversified cropping, pairs rural road investment with market access, and bundles diversification advice with climate information and weather-index insurance in drought-prone areas.","作物多样化是一种气候智能型农业（climate-smart agriculture, CSA）实践，其产量和农业生态效益已有充分文献记载，但关于其在尼日利亚福利影响的严格、具有全国代表性的证据仍然匮乏。本研究利用尼日利亚第四轮生活标准测量研究——农业综合调查（LSMS-ISA），考察了3 229户农户采用作物多样化的决定因素及其福利效应。采用Probit模型识别采用行为的决定因素，并运用内生转换回归（endogenous switching regression, ESR）模型——该模型校正了由可观测和不可观测异质性引起的选择偏误——估计采用行为对家庭人均消费支出和膳食多样性的因果影响。约1 846户（57%）采用了作物多样化。家庭规模、农场规模、户主年龄、距道路距离、化肥使用和温度暴露显著提高了采用概率，而教育、距市场距离、融资可得性和降雨冲击显著降低了采用概率。采用作物多样化使采用者的人均消费支出平均处理效应提高0.72个对数点，家庭膳食多样性得分提高2.03分，相对于国家贫困和膳食多样性基准而言，这些效应较大。上述结果表明，市场准入受限、与专业化种植挂钩的信贷产品以及气候冲击共同抑制了采用行为。政府农业和营养机构应联合资助一项有针对性的计划，重新设计信贷产品以支持多样化种植，将农村道路投资与市场准入相结合，并在干旱易发地区将多样化建议与气候信息和天气指数保险捆绑推广。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-16T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,81,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},18,22,14,9,1,"基于全国代表性农户调查的因果识别研究，方法扎实、结论对气候智慧农业与农村信贷政策有参考价值，但属他国经验，影响层级限于细分领域。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"气候智慧农业","尼日利亚","农业信贷","农户福利","作物多样化",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},"H7","climate","气候适应与防灾减灾","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fclimate","H",[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":42},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":43,"agricultural_evidence":47},[44,52,59,66,72],{"code":45,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":48,"abstract":50,"tags":51},"I1",11,true,[49],"smart agriculture",[49],[],{"code":32,"score":53,"supported":47,"title":54,"abstract":55,"tags":58},7,[],[56,57],"干旱","drought",[26],{"code":60,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":62,"abstract":63,"tags":65},"F3",3,[],[64],"fertilizer",[],{"code":67,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":68,"abstract":69,"tags":71},"H6",[],[70],"农业生态",[],{"code":73,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":74,"abstract":75,"tags":76},"G3",[],[],[28],[78,79],"尼日利亚 作物多样化 农户福利","LSMS-ISA 气候智慧农业","尼日利亚作物多样化农户福利-5143",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1957540",{"doi":82,"openalex_id":84,"authors":85,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":94,"card":95,"direction":101,"ingested_from":102},"W7222656886",[86,89,92],{"name":87,"orcid":88},"Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-9242-901X",{"name":90,"orcid":91},"Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-7099-5056",{"name":93,"orcid":9},"Chinedum Uzoma Nwajiuba","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1957540\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":96,"method":97,"finding":98,"direction":99,"opportunity":100},"用尼日利亚全国农户调查数据评估作物多样化对家庭福利的因果影响。","基于LSMS-ISA 3229户数据，用Probit与内生转换回归模型。","采用率57%，多样化使人均消费支出提高0.72对数点、膳食多样性提高2.03分。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可结合气候信息与气象指数保险服务，研究数字农技推广如何促进多样化采纳与福利提升。","智慧农业 \u002F 农业物联网","openalex","2026-10-17T23:30:06.860811Z",{"total":105,"page":21,"page_size":105,"items":106},6,[107,180,271,341,448,550],{"id":108,"title":109,"url":110,"summary":111,"summary_zh":112,"content":9,"source_name":113,"source_url":110,"published_at":114,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":115,"score_detail":116,"sources":119,"tags":121,"primary_topic":125,"secondary_topics":126,"classification":127,"search_phrases":153,"slug":156,"view_count":81,"doi":157,"paper":158,"created_at":179},4805,"How much climate-smart agriculture is enough? A dose-response analysis of technology adoption effects on farmer welfare in Ghana","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pclm.0000886","Climate-smart agricultural technologies (CSAT) are promoted to enhance agricultural productivity and strengthen resilience to climate change. However, limited empirical evidence exists on the effects of adoption intensity, particularly when farmers adopt multiple technologies simultaneously. This study examines the effects of CSAT adoption intensity on maize yield and household asset accumulation in Ghana using survey data from 2,151 maize farmers. A dose–response model with Heckman selection is applied to address potential selection bias and estimate the causal effects of varying adoption levels. The findings show that farmers’ education, access to credit, extension services, and perceived drought significantly influence both the likelihood and intensity of CSAT adoption. Results reveal a U-shaped relationship between CSAT adoption intensity and maize yield, where yields initially decline but increase as adoption intensity rises. On average, higher CSAT adoption is associated with a 21% increase in maize yield. Similarly, CSAT intensity shows a nonlinear positive relationship with household asset accumulation, with an average 19.5% increase in assets. The results also indicate heterogeneous effects across farmers. Overall, higher CSAT adoption improves agricultural productivity and long-term household welfare, highlighting the need to strengthen extension services, expand credit access, and raise climate risk awareness to promote sustainable agricultural development.","气候智能型农业技术(CSAT)被推广用于提高农业生产力和增强对气候变化的适应能力。然而，关于采用强度的效应，尤其是当农民同时采用多项技术时，实证证据仍然有限。本研究利用来自加纳2151户玉米种植户的调查数据，考察了气候智能型农业技术采用强度对玉米产量和家庭资产积累的影响。研究采用带Heckman选择的剂量—反应模型来处理潜在的选择偏差，并估计不同采用水平的因果效应。研究结果表明，农民的受教育程度、信贷可得性、推广服务以及感知到的干旱显著影响其采用气候智能型农业技术的可能性和强度。结果揭示了气候智能型农业技术采用强度与玉米产量之间呈U型关系，即产量最初下降，但随着采用强度的提高而增加。平均而言，较高的气候智能型农业技术采用与玉米产量提高21%相关。同样，气候智能型农业技术采用强度与家庭资产积累呈非线性正相关关系，资产平均增加19.5%。结果还表明，不同农民之间存在异质性效应。总体而言，较高的气候智能型农业技术采用提高了农业生产力和长期家庭福利，凸显了加强推广服务、扩大信贷获取渠道和提高气候风险意识的必要性，以促进农业可持续发展。","PLOS Climate","2026-10-12T00:00:00Z",79,{"impact":117,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":118},16,"基于2151户加纳玉米农户的剂量反应分析，揭示气候智慧农业技术采纳强度与产量、资产的U型及非线性关系，方法扎实、数据规模可观，对技术推广强度决策有参考价值。",[120],{"name":113,"url":110},[26,122,123,124,29],"加纳","技术采纳","玉米产量",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":128},{"candidates":129,"agricultural_evidence":47},[130,136,141,148],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":131,"abstract":132,"tags":135},[],[133,56,134,57],"气候变化","climate change",[26],{"code":45,"score":137,"supported":47,"title":138,"abstract":139,"tags":140},8,[49],[],[],{"code":142,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":143,"abstract":144,"tags":147},"A3",[],[145,146],"玉米","maize",[],{"code":149,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":150,"abstract":151,"tags":152},"G1",[],[],[123],[154,155],"加纳 气候智慧农业 玉米","气候智慧农业 农户福利 技术采纳 玉米产量","加纳气候智慧农业玉米-4805","10.1371\u002Fjournal.pclm.0000886",{"doi":157,"openalex_id":159,"authors":160,"venue":113,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":110,"card":173,"direction":101,"ingested_from":102},"W7221536273",[161,164,167,170],{"name":162,"orcid":163},"Stephen Prah","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-0482-087X",{"name":165,"orcid":166},"John N. Ng’ombe","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-1410-1350",{"name":168,"orcid":169},"Bright Owusu Asante","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5415-6110",{"name":171,"orcid":172},"Jonathan Masasi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-8855-783X",{"tldr":174,"method":175,"finding":176,"direction":177,"opportunity":178},"基于加纳2151户玉米农户，分析气候智慧型技术采纳强度对产量与家庭资产的影响。","剂量反应模型结合Heckman选择，处理采纳强度与选择偏差。","采纳强度与产量呈U型关系，高强度采纳使产量增21%、资产增19.5%。","农业人工智能与决策模型","可探究不同技术组合的剂量阈值与异质性，为精准推广策略提供依据。","2026-10-13T23:30:09.001081Z",{"id":181,"title":182,"url":183,"summary":184,"summary_zh":185,"content":9,"source_name":186,"source_url":183,"published_at":187,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":188,"score_detail":189,"sources":192,"tags":194,"primary_topic":199,"secondary_topics":205,"classification":213,"search_phrases":249,"slug":252,"view_count":81,"doi":253,"paper":254,"created_at":270},5478,"Characterisation of Food Security Situation for Smallholder Farmers in Zvimba","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30","This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the food security situation among smallholder farmers (SHFs) in Zvimba District, Zimbabwe. Smallholder agriculture is the bedrock of Zimbabwe's food system, yet it remains highly vulnerable to a complex array of shocks and stressors. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research investigates the prevalence, drivers and lived experiences of food insecurity within this community. A structured survey was administered to 412 randomly selected smallholder households across the district's wards. The quantitative data were supplemented by 12 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 24 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with farmers, community leaders and agricultural extension officers to capture qualitative nuances. The study is grounded in the Food Security Theory (FST), which conceptualises food security through its four pillars: food availability, food access, food utilisation and food stability. Findings reveal a precarious food security situation. Quantitatively, 78.4% of households were found to be food insecure, with an average Hunger Months Index of 4.7 months per year. The study identifies a significant disconnect between maize production, the national staple and household consumption, with over 65% of households failing to produce enough maize to meet their annual requirements. Qualitative data illuminated the multi-faceted drivers of this insecurity. Key points to note include climate change whereby erratic rainfall and prolonged mid-season dry spells were consistently reported as the primary production challenges, limited access to farming inputs whereby high costs and unreliable supplies of certified seeds, fertilizers and agro[1]chemicals constrain productivity. Morelso, socio-economic factors such as poverty, lack of viable alternative livelihoods and limited access to formal credit perpetuate a cycle of vulnerability. In addition, institutional weaknesses, for example, challenges with agricultural extension services and market inefficiencies, exacerbate the situation. The study concludes that food insecurity in Zvimba is not merely a problem of food production, but is deeply rooted in structural issues affecting food access, food utilisation, as well as food stability. Recommendations are proposed for a multi-sectoral approach, including promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) and drought-resistant crops, strengthening input support systems and rural finance, diversifying livelihood strategies and enhancing the capacity of extension services. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the localised dynamics of food security and provides evidence-based guidance for policymakers, development practitioners and the farmers of Zvimba themselves.","本研究对津巴布韦兹维姆巴区小农户（smallholder farmers, SHFs）的粮食安全状况进行了全面分析。小农农业是津巴布韦粮食体系的基石，但仍极易受到一系列复杂冲击和压力的影响。本研究采用混合方法，考察了该社区粮食不安全的普遍程度、驱动因素及生活体验。研究对该区各选区随机抽取的412户小农户进行了结构化问卷调查。定量数据辅以12次焦点小组讨论（FGDs）和24次关键知情人访谈（KIIs），访谈对象包括农民、社区领袖和农业推广人员，以捕捉定性层面的细微差异。本研究以粮食安全理论（Food Security Theory, FST）为基础，该理论通过四大支柱界定粮食安全：粮食可供性、粮食获取、粮食利用和粮食稳定性。研究结果揭示了严峻的粮食安全形势。定量数据显示，78.4%的家庭存在粮食不安全，年均饥饿月份指数为4.7个月。研究发现，玉米产量——该国主粮——与家庭消费之间存在显著脱节，超过65%的家庭生产的玉米不足以满足其年度需求。定性数据揭示了这一不安全状况的多重驱动因素。值得注意的要点包括：气候变化，即降雨不稳定和持续的中期干旱被一致报告为主要生产挑战；农业投入品获取受限，即认证种子、化肥和农用化学品成本高昂且供应不可靠，制约了生产力。此外，贫困、缺乏可行的替代生计以及正规信贷获取受限等社会经济因素使脆弱性循环持续存在。此外，制度薄弱环节，例如农业推广服务面临的挑战和市场效率低下，加剧了这一状况。研究得出结论，兹维姆巴的粮食不安全不仅仅是粮食生产问题，而是深深植根于影响粮食获取、粮食利用以及粮食稳定性的结构性问题。研究提出了采取多部门方法的建议，包括推广气候智能型农业（Climate-Smart Agriculture, CSA）和抗旱作物、加强投入品支持体系和农村金融、多样化生计策略以及增强","Ngenani The Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti Journal of Community Engagement and Societal Transformations","2026-10-20T00:00:00Z",55,{"impact":137,"substance":17,"depth":190,"authority":105,"freshness":137,"relevant":21,"comment":191},15,"基于412户调查与混合方法的扎实实证研究，但属津巴布韦地方性案例，公共影响与信源权威度有限，可作参考而非每日精选。",[193],{"name":186,"url":183},[195,196,26,197,198],"粮食安全","小农户","农业推广","津巴布韦",{"code":200,"slug":201,"name":202,"path":203,"parent_code":204},"A8","yield-food-security","单产提升与粮食安全","\u002Ftopic\u002Ffield-crops\u002Fyield-food-security","A",[206,212],{"code":207,"slug":208,"name":209,"path":210,"parent_code":211},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":214},{"candidates":215,"agricultural_evidence":47},[216,221,226,230,235,239,245],{"code":200,"score":190,"supported":47,"title":217,"abstract":219,"tags":220},[218],"food security",[195,218],[195],{"code":207,"score":190,"supported":47,"title":222,"abstract":224,"tags":225},[223],"smallholder",[196,223],[196],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":227,"abstract":228,"tags":229},[],[133,56,134,57],[26],{"code":149,"score":53,"supported":47,"title":231,"abstract":232,"tags":234},[],[197,233],"agricultural extension",[197],{"code":142,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":236,"abstract":237,"tags":238},[],[145,146],[],{"code":73,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":240,"abstract":241,"tags":244},[],[242,243],"农村金融","rural finance",[],{"code":45,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":246,"abstract":247,"tags":248},[],[49],[],[250,251],"Zvimba 小农户 粮食安全","津巴布韦 小农 玉米","Zvimba小农户粮食安全-5478","10.71458\u002Frx0qpm30",{"doi":253,"openalex_id":255,"authors":256,"venue":186,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":9,"card":265,"direction":101,"ingested_from":102},"W7223029383",[257,260,263],{"name":258,"orcid":259},"Casper Myambo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-8625-7526",{"name":261,"orcid":262},"Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-4123-0238",{"name":264,"orcid":9},"Patience Mutopo",{"tldr":266,"method":267,"finding":268,"direction":99,"opportunity":269},"调查津巴布韦Zvimba小农户粮食安全状况，分析其普遍性、成因与实际体验。","混合方法：412户问卷、12场焦点小组、24个关键人物访谈，基于粮食安全四支柱理","78.4%家庭粮食不安全，年均饥饿月4.7个月，主因是气候、投入、社会经济与制度等结构性问题。","可探索用移动端问卷与遥感产量监测构建小农户粮食安全动态预警与精准干预系统。","2026-10-21T23:30:08.937079Z",{"id":272,"title":273,"url":274,"summary":275,"summary_zh":276,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":274,"published_at":187,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":115,"score_detail":277,"sources":281,"tags":283,"primary_topic":288,"secondary_topics":289,"classification":290,"search_phrases":320,"slug":323,"view_count":81,"doi":324,"paper":325,"created_at":340},5473,"Can regional value-chain integration decouple China's agri-food export growth from production-side direct CO2 attributed to export domestic value added? Evidence from belt and road partner economies","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1977325","This study examines whether regional value-chain (RVC) integration can support agri-food export growth while improving the carbon performance of China's export sectors. We build a 2007–2023 bilateral country–industry–year panel for C01 agriculture, forestry, and fishing and C03 food processing across 39 economies currently classified as Belt and Road partners. Asian Development Bank multi-regional input–output tables identify bilateral value-added paths, while Chinese sectoral fossil-energy data and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission factors are used to measure production-side direct fossil-energy CO 2 attributed to export domestic value added. The analysis combines logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition, fixed-effects models, an external shift-share instrument, value-chain configuration tests, and a within–between decomposition. Four findings stand out. First, long-run carbon-intensity improvement more than offsets cumulative scale and structural pressures. Second, the baseline fixed-effects and IV estimates show a negative overall association between RVC cooperation and absolute production-side direct CO 2 , and this relationship remains negative in post-2013 samples. Third, within established partner–industry relationships, deeper RVC is significantly associated with lower carbon per unit of exports, while the export-scale and absolute-carbon coefficients are statistically insignificant. Fourth, denser two-way embedment is associated with higher carbon pressure, a more forward-oriented structure with lower carbon, and deep cooperation with a higher carbon association than shallow cooperation. The results suggest that climate-smart agri-food integration should combine production-efficiency gains with forward-oriented domestic value creation and careful monitoring of the scale effects of deeper production networks.","本研究考察区域价值链（RVC）整合能否在促进农食产品出口增长的同时改善中国出口部门的碳绩效。我们构建了2007—2023年双边国家—行业—年份面板数据，涵盖目前被归类为“一带一路”伙伴的39个经济体中的C01农、林、渔业和C03食品加工业。亚洲开发银行多区域投入产出表用于识别双边增加值路径，中国部门化石能源数据和政府间气候变化专门委员会排放因子用于测算出口国内增加值所对应的生产侧直接化石能源CO₂。分析结合了对数平均迪氏指数分解、固定效应模型、外部移动份额工具变量、价值链构型检验以及组内—组间分解。有四項发现尤为突出。第一，长期碳强度的改善足以抵消累积的规模压力和结构压力。第二，基准固定效应和IV估计显示，RVC合作与绝对生产侧直接CO₂总体上呈负相关，且这一关系在2013年之后的样本中仍为负。第三，在既有的伙伴—行业关系中，更深的RVC与单位出口碳含量较低显著相关，而出口规模和绝对碳的系数在统计上不显著。第四，更密集的双向嵌入与更高的碳压力相关，更偏向前的结构与更低的碳相关，深度合作比浅层合作具有更高的碳关联。结果表明，气候智慧型农食一体化应将生产效率提升与偏向前的国内价值创造相结合，并审慎监测更深生产网络的规模效应。",{"impact":117,"substance":18,"depth":278,"authority":279,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":280},19,13,"基于39个一带一路伙伴国2007–2023年面板数据，方法扎实、结论有新意，对农业绿色贸易政策有参考价值，但属学术论文，公共影响有限。",[282],{"name":10,"url":274},[284,285,26,286,287],"农业碳排放","一带一路","农产品贸易","全球价值链",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":291},{"candidates":292,"agricultural_evidence":47},[293,297,304,310,315],{"code":32,"score":53,"supported":47,"title":294,"abstract":295,"tags":296},[],[133,134],[26],{"code":298,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":299,"abstract":300,"tags":303},"E1",[],[301,302],"食品加工","food processing",[],{"code":305,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":306,"abstract":307,"tags":309},"D",[],[308],"渔业",[],{"code":311,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":312,"abstract":313,"tags":314},"E5",[],[],[286],{"code":316,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":317,"abstract":318,"tags":319},"H4",[],[],[284],[321,322],"中国 农食产品 出口 碳排放","一带一路 区域价值链","中国农食产品出口碳排放-5473","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1977325",{"doi":324,"openalex_id":326,"authors":327,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":274,"card":334,"direction":338,"ingested_from":102},"W7223067445",[328,330,332],{"name":329,"orcid":9},"Kunlin Tang",{"name":331,"orcid":9},"Wei Yang",{"name":333,"orcid":9},"Yuan Huang",{"tldr":335,"method":336,"finding":337,"direction":338,"opportunity":339},"研究区域价值链整合能否使中国农食出口增长与生产侧直接CO2脱钩。","2007–2023年39个一带一路经济体的双边面板，用ADB多区域投入产出表与L","长期碳强度改善抵消规模压力，RVC合作总体降低绝对CO2，但深度双向嵌入会推高碳压力。","农业绿色发展与碳","可探究前向型国内增加值创造与深度生产网络的规模效应监测机制，识别气候智慧型农食整合路径。","2026-10-21T23:30:07.454815Z",{"id":342,"title":343,"url":344,"summary":345,"summary_zh":346,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":344,"published_at":187,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":347,"score_detail":348,"sources":352,"tags":354,"primary_topic":359,"secondary_topics":364,"classification":370,"search_phrases":422,"slug":425,"view_count":81,"doi":426,"paper":427,"created_at":447},5472,"Turning dirt into gold: the business case of soil carbon for agrarian pathways in arid climate","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966265","Introduction Agricultural carbon sequestration offers considerable potential for mitigating anthropogenic climate change, particularly in the low-organic-carbon soils of the Middle East. This study presents a foundational scenario-based assessment of soil carbon sequestration and economic feasibility. Materials and methods Crop production and market datasets from Jordanian statistics (1998–2023) were used to estimate potential soil carbon sequestration and economic performance. Using benchmarks from literature in comparable agroecological regions, four soil carbon management practices were evaluated across multiple crops for their carbon storage potential using Monte Carlo uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity of economic performance was assessed under optimistic\u002Fpessimistic scenarios. Results Among the evaluated practices, the highest carbon sequestration rate was achieved through increased Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), reaching a maximum of 27.44 metric tons of CO₂ per hectare per year (tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear) under the high scenario for cucumbers. In contrast, barley showed the highest sequestration rate at 0.45 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear under increased SOC in the high scenario. Sensitivity analysis showed that ±20% uncertainty in the management coefficients resulted in practice-specific changes of 1.11 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear for increased SOC and 0.46 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear for improved cropland management. Horticultural crops, particularly cucumbers and lemons, exhibited the highest sequestration rates and strongest responses to management interventions. Field crops such as wheat, barley, and olives demonstrated lower, more stable sequestration rates. Economic analysis revealed that cucumbers, grapes, potatoes, and Open-field farming (OFF) tomatoes achieved the highest tri-pillar performance (net and adjusted profits and break-even cost) alongside effective carbon sequestration. These findings highlight that crop choice is a primary determinant of both crop profitability and sequestrated carbon potential and feasibility, with significant implications for climate-smart agriculture, carbon credit mechanisms, and intensification strategies in data-scarce regions. Study limitations While empirical field validation remains a future priority, this model-based study provides a screening-level theoretical baseline to guide targeted research and investment in arid agricultural systems.","引言 农业碳封存为缓解人为气候变化提供了可观潜力，尤其是在中东低有机碳土壤中。本研究提出了一项基于情景的土壤碳封存与经济学可行性基础评估。材料与方法 利用约旦统计数据（1998—2023年）中的作物生产和市场数据集，估算潜在的土壤碳封存及经济表现。参考可比农业生态区域文献中的基准值，采用蒙特卡洛不确定性分析和敏感性分析，评估了四种土壤碳管理措施在多种作物上的碳储存潜力。在乐观\u002F悲观情景下评估了经济表现的敏感性。结果 在评估的各项措施中，通过增加土壤有机碳（SOC）实现的碳封存速率最高，在黄瓜的高情景下达到最高27.44公吨二氧化碳\u002F公顷\u002F年（tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear）。相比之下，大麦在增加SOC的高情景下表现出最高的封存速率，为0.45 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear。敏感性分析表明，管理系数±20%的不确定性导致增加SOC和改善农田管理分别产生1.11 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear和0.46 tCO₂\u002Fha\u002Fyear的措施特异性变化。园艺作物，尤其是黄瓜和柠檬，表现出最高的封存速率和对管理干预的最强响应。小麦、大麦和橄榄等大田作物表现出较低但更稳定的封存速率。经济分析显示，黄瓜、葡萄、马铃薯和露地栽培（OFF）番茄在有效碳封存的同时实现了最高的三支柱表现（净利润、调整后利润和盈亏平衡成本）。这些发现突出表明，作物选择是作物盈利能力和封存碳潜力及可行性的主要决定因素，对气候智慧型农业、碳信用机制和数据稀缺地区的集约化策略具有重要意义。研究局限性 尽管田间实证验证仍是未来的优先事项，但这项基于模型的研究提供了筛选层面的理论基线，以指导干旱农业系统中的针对性研究和投资。",70,{"impact":349,"substance":350,"depth":117,"authority":279,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":351},12,20,"基于约旦1998–2023年统计数据的模型情景研究，量化了不同作物固碳速率与经济收益，对干旱区农业碳汇与碳信用机制有参考价值，但属区域性模拟研究，尚未经田间验证。",[353],{"name":10,"url":344},[26,355,356,357,358],"碳交易","干旱农业","土壤碳汇","作物选择",{"code":360,"slug":361,"name":362,"path":363,"parent_code":36},"H2","soil","土壤健康与改良","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fsoil",[365,366],{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},{"code":316,"slug":367,"name":368,"path":369,"parent_code":36},"carbon","农业碳与绿色低碳","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fcarbon",{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":371},{"candidates":372,"agricultural_evidence":47},[373,378,382,388,395,402,408,414,418],{"code":360,"score":19,"supported":47,"title":374,"abstract":375,"tags":377},[361],[376,361],"土壤",[],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":379,"abstract":380,"tags":381},[],[133,56,134],[26],{"code":316,"score":137,"supported":47,"title":383,"abstract":384,"tags":387},[],[385,386],"农业碳","carbon sequestration",[357,355],{"code":389,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":390,"abstract":391,"tags":394},"A2",[],[392,393],"小麦","wheat",[],{"code":396,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":397,"abstract":398,"tags":401},"B1",[],[399,400],"番茄","黄瓜",[],{"code":403,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":404,"abstract":405,"tags":407},"A5",[],[406],"马铃薯",[],{"code":409,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":410,"abstract":411,"tags":413},"B2",[],[412],"葡萄",[],{"code":67,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":415,"abstract":416,"tags":417},[],[70],[],{"code":45,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":419,"abstract":420,"tags":421},[],[49],[],[423,424],"约旦 土壤碳汇 黄瓜","土壤固碳 经济可行性","约旦土壤碳汇黄瓜-5472","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966265",{"doi":426,"openalex_id":428,"authors":429,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":344,"card":442,"direction":101,"ingested_from":102},"W7223064172",[430,432,434,437,439],{"name":431,"orcid":9},"Tasnim Althalaj",{"name":433,"orcid":9},"Ross. M. Thompson",{"name":435,"orcid":436},"Tala H. Qtaishat","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-2700-6686",{"name":438,"orcid":9},"Dan Bumblauskas",{"name":440,"orcid":441},"Fayha Al-Shibli","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-5628-0975",{"tldr":443,"method":444,"finding":445,"direction":338,"opportunity":446},"基于约旦1998–2023年数据，评估干旱区土壤固碳潜力与经济可行性。","用蒙特卡洛不确定性与敏感性分析，评估四种土壤碳管理措施在多作物下的表现。","黄瓜等园艺作物固碳率最高，作物选择是固碳与盈利的关键决定因素。","数据稀缺干旱区可结合田间验证与碳信用机制，研究作物级固碳经济激励设计。","2026-10-21T23:30:07.383006Z",{"id":449,"title":450,"url":451,"summary":452,"summary_zh":453,"content":9,"source_name":454,"source_url":451,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":455,"score_detail":456,"sources":458,"tags":460,"primary_topic":463,"secondary_topics":464,"classification":467,"search_phrases":532,"slug":535,"view_count":81,"doi":536,"paper":537,"created_at":549},5185,"When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182","When the rains are too much: El Niño, Smallholder Farmers and Food Security in Western Kenya For generations, farmers in Western Kenya have watched the skies carefully. The arrival, duration, and distribution of rainfall have traditionally provided important signals about when to prepare land, plant, weed, and harvest. But these signals are becoming increasingly difficult to read. Climate change is altering rainfall patterns, while increasingly frequent extreme weather events are making farming more uncertain. The current outlook for the October–December 2026 season brings this challenge sharply into focus. The IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC) forecasts a wetter-than-normal season across much of the Greater Horn of Africa. The Lake Victoria Basin, which includes large parts of Western Kenya, is among the areas with a high likelihood of receiving more than 400 mm of seasonal rainfall. ICPAC reports that El Niño has developed and is expected to strengthen, while a positive Indian Ocean Dipole is also expected—climate conditions that are commonly associated with enhanced rainfall in the region, and is likely to run into February of 2027. But what does this mean for the smallholder farmer? The first point is that more rainfall does not necessarily mean more food. For a farmer whose livelihood depends almost entirely on rain-fed agriculture, abundant rainfall can be a blessing. It can replenish streams and water sources, improve soil moisture, restore pasture and create favourable conditions for crop production. If well distributed, the rains could contribute to improved harvests and household food supplies. The problem arises when rainfall is too intense, too concentrated or poorly distributed. A farmer may receive a great deal of rain in a few days and then experience a dry spell. Another farmer a few kilometres away may receive considerably less. Heavy downpours can cause flooding, waterlogging and soil erosion. Seeds may be washed away soon after planting. Young crops can be submerged or damaged. Valuable topsoil and nutrients can be carried away, reducing the productivity of land in subsequent seasons. This is particularly important in Western Kenya, where many households depend on small parcels of land for both food and income. A failed or damaged crop is not simply an agricultural loss. It can mean less food in the household, less money for school fees and health care, and fewer resources to purchase nutritious foods. The food-security paradox We must, therefore, look beyond agricultural production to food and nutrition security. A household may produce enough maize yet still have a poor diet if vegetables, legumes, fruits, milk, eggs or other foods are unavailable or unaffordable. Climate shocks can reduce this diversity. When crops are damaged, families may depend more heavily on whatever staple food remains available. This is why climate resilience must also be nutrition-sensitive. Western Kenya has a rich agricultural tradition and considerable potential for diversified food production. Farmers grow cereals, legumes, vegetables and root crops and keep livestock and poultry. Such diversity is not merely an agricultural advantage; it is a nutritional resource. It can provide different foods, spread risk and generate income at different times of the year. Climate adaptation should, therefore, not encourage farmers simply to produce more of one crop. It should help them build diverse and resilient farming systems. Women carry a large part of the burden The impact of erratic and excessive rainfall also has a gender dimension. Women in smallholder households are often deeply involved in food production, processing, preparation and household nutrition. When harvests fail, or food prices rise, women frequently have to find ways of stretching limited household resources to feed the family. When roads become impassable or markets are disrupted, women may have greater difficulty accessing food and agricultural inputs. When water sources are contaminated or damaged, household responsibilities can become even more demanding. Climate adaptation must therefore deliberately include women—not simply as beneficiaries, but as decision-makers, innovators, farmers and leaders. Young people must also be part of the solution There is another group that deserves greater attention: young people. Western Kenya cannot build climate-resilient agriculture while treating agriculture as an occupation of the past. Young people need to see opportunities in modern farming, agro-processing, food safety, climate information services, irrigation, digital agriculture and agricultural entrepreneurship. The increasing unpredictability of climate may actually provide an opportunity to make agriculture more innovative. Young people can help introduce new technologies, improve access to climate information, develop value-added products and create businesses around food production and processing. From forecasting to action The availability of a climate forecast is useful only if it reaches the people who need it in time. Farmers need information that answers practical questions: When should I plant? Which crops or varieties are appropriate? How can I protect my soil? What should I do if rainfall becomes excessive? How can I protect harvested food? Where can I obtain reliable seed and other inputs? Seasonal forecasts should, therefore, be translated into local, practical agricultural advice. ICPAC itself emphasizes that seasonal forecasts should be used together with weekly and monthly forecasts and national meteorological information. This requires stronger links between meteorological services, agricultural extension officers, researchers, county governments, farmer organizations and communities. We should also strengthen simple but important measures: water harvesting, drainage, terracing and soil conservation; planting crops and varieties suited to local conditions; maintaining vegetation cover; diversifying crops and livestock; improving storage facilities; and protecting food from moisture and contamination. Prepare before the rain comes The greatest lesson from the current El Niño outlook is perhaps that preparedness must begin before the first heavy rains arrive. Governments and development partners should not wait for floods, damaged roads, destroyed crops or food shortages before responding. Early warning should lead to early action. Farmers should be supported to prepare their farms, protect livestock, secure seed and inputs, strengthen food storage and identify alternative routes to markets. This is particularly important because the same season can produce both opportunities and losses. ICPAC notes that enhanced rainfall can support agricultural production and replenish water resources, but can simultaneously increase the risk of flooding, flash floods and landslides in vulnerable areas. A changing climate requires a different agricultural mindset Perhaps the most important change we need is in the way we think about farming. For too long, agricultural planning has often assumed that rainfall will behave according to a familiar calendar. That assumption is becoming increasingly unsafe. Farmers now have to manage not only too little rain, but also too much rain, rain at the wrong time and rain in the wrong place. The challenge is, therefore, not simply to produce more food. It is to build food systems that can continue providing adequate, diverse, safe and nutritious food under increasingly uncertain climatic conditions. Western Kenya's smallholder farmers should not be left alone to carry this burden. They need science that responds to their realities, extension services that reach them, climate information they can understand and use, financial services that help them manage risk, markets that function during difficult seasons, and policies that recognize the central role of smallholder agriculture in national food and nutrition security, and partners who are willing to appreciate and make use of indigenous knowledge. El Niño should, therefore, be viewed neither simply as a disaster nor automatically as a blessing. It is a climate event whose consequences will depend greatly on our preparedness. The question before us is not merely, “Will the rains come?” They probably will. The more important question is: Will our farmers, food systems and institutions be ready when they do? That is where climate resilience—and ultimately food and nutrition security—will be tested. Prof. Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o Founder and Editor-in-Chief, AJFAND ORCiD: https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","当雨水过多时：厄尔尼诺现象、小农户与肯尼亚西部的粮食安全\n\n世代以来，肯尼亚西部的农民一直密切关注着天空。降雨的到来、持续时间和分布，传统上为何时整地、播种、除草和收获提供了重要信号。但这些信号正变得越来越难以解读。气候变化正在改变降雨模式，而日益频繁的极端天气事件使农业变得更加不确定。当前对2026年10月至12月季节的展望使这一挑战凸显出来。政府间发展组织气候预测与应用中心（ICPAC）预测，大非洲之角大部分地区将迎来高于正常水平的湿润季节。维多利亚湖流域——包括肯尼亚西部的大部分地区——属于极有可能获得超过400毫米季节性降雨的区域之一。ICPAC报告称，厄尔尼诺现象已经形成并预计将增强，同时预计还将出现正印度洋偶极子——这些气候条件通常与该地区降雨增强相关，并可能持续到2027年2月。但这对小农户意味着什么？首先，更多降雨并不必然意味着更多粮食。对于生计几乎完全依赖雨养农业的农民来说，充沛的降雨可能是福。它可以补充溪流和水源、改善土壤湿度、恢复牧场，并为作物生产创造有利条件。如果分布良好，降雨可能有助于改善收成和家庭粮食供应。问题出现在降雨过于猛烈、过于集中或分布不均的时候。一个农民可能在几天内获得大量降雨，随后又经历一段干旱期。几公里外的另一个农民可能获得的降雨少得多。暴雨可能引发洪水、渍涝和土壤侵蚀。种子可能在播种后不久被冲走。幼苗可能被淹没或受损。宝贵的表土和养分可能被带走，降低土地在后续季节的生产力。这在肯尼亚西部尤为重要，因为许多家庭依赖小块土地获取食物和收入。作物歉收或受损不仅仅是农业损失。它可能意味着家庭食物减少、用于学费和医疗的钱减少，以及购买营养食品的资源减少。粮食安全……","African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development",75,{"impact":17,"substance":350,"depth":117,"authority":279,"freshness":137,"relevant":21,"comment":457},"核心期刊评论文章，结合El Niño预测讨论小农户气候适应与粮食营养安全，有实质分析与行动建议，但属区域案例、非信息化技术突破。",[459],{"name":454,"url":451},[461,195,196,26,462],"肯尼亚","气候预警",{"code":200,"slug":201,"name":202,"path":203,"parent_code":204},[465,466],{"code":207,"slug":208,"name":209,"path":210,"parent_code":211},{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":468},{"candidates":469,"agricultural_evidence":47},[470,474,478,484,488,492,498,504,510,516,522,526],{"code":200,"score":190,"supported":47,"title":471,"abstract":472,"tags":473},[218],[195,218],[195],{"code":207,"score":190,"supported":47,"title":475,"abstract":476,"tags":477},[223],[196,223],[196],{"code":32,"score":13,"supported":47,"title":479,"abstract":480,"tags":483},[],[133,56,134,481,482],"climate resilience","waterlogging",[26],{"code":360,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":485,"abstract":486,"tags":487},[],[376,361],[],{"code":142,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":489,"abstract":490,"tags":491},[],[146],[],{"code":493,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":494,"abstract":495,"tags":497},"B4",[],[496],"月季",[],{"code":499,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":500,"abstract":501,"tags":503},"C",[],[502],"livestock",[],{"code":505,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":506,"abstract":507,"tags":509},"C3",[],[508],"poultry",[],{"code":511,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":512,"abstract":513,"tags":515},"E4",[],[514],"food safety",[],{"code":517,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":518,"abstract":519,"tags":521},"F4",[],[520],"除草",[],{"code":149,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":523,"abstract":524,"tags":525},[],[233],[],{"code":527,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":528,"abstract":529,"tags":531},"H3",[],[530],"irrigation",[],[533,534],"El Niño 小农户 粮食安全","ICPAC 季节预报 肯尼亚","ElNiño小农户粮食安全-5185","10.18697\u002Fajfand.155.ed182",{"doi":536,"openalex_id":538,"authors":539,"venue":454,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":543,"card":544,"direction":99,"ingested_from":102},"W7222630373",[540],{"name":541,"orcid":542},"Ruth Khasaya Oniang'o","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-8344-9093","https:\u002F\u002Fajfand.net\u002FVolume26\u002FNo8\u002FEditorialVol26No8.pdf",{"tldr":545,"method":546,"finding":547,"direction":338,"opportunity":548},"分析厄尔尼诺导致肯尼亚西部降雨过量对小农粮食安全的影响","基于ICPAC季节气候预测与厄尔尼诺、印度洋偶极子分析","降雨过多且分布不均会引发洪涝、土壤侵蚀，反而威胁小农粮食安全","可结合遥感与农户调查，量化极端降雨时空分布对小农产量与粮食安全的非线性影响","2026-10-17T23:30:36.130973Z",{"id":551,"title":552,"url":553,"summary":554,"summary_zh":555,"content":9,"source_name":556,"source_url":553,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":347,"score_detail":557,"sources":559,"tags":561,"primary_topic":566,"secondary_topics":567,"classification":568,"search_phrases":601,"slug":604,"view_count":81,"doi":605,"paper":606,"created_at":621},5148,"Climate-Smart Extension Strategies for Farm Women","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23411253","Abstract Climate change poses a major threat to agricultural productivity, food security, and rural livelihoods, particularly in developing countries where agriculture is highly dependent on climatic conditions. Rural women farmers play a significant role in agricultural production, household food security, natural resource management, and rural livelihoods, yet they often have limited access to agricultural resources, climate information, and technology, finance, and extension services. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) provides an approach to address these challenges through increased productivity, improved resilience to climate change, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This review examines the role of climate-smart extension strategies in supporting rural women farmers in adapting to climate variability. The review highlights the importance of capacity building and training, access to timely climate and weather information, promotion of climate-resilient technologies, Farmer Field Schools, digital and ICT-based extension services, and sustainable resource management. These strategies can improve women's knowledge and skills, strengthen decision-making, reduce drudgery, enhance food and nutritional security, increase income, and improve resilience to climate-related shocks. However, several challenges, including inadequate information, limited access to credit and agricultural inputs, insufficient digital infrastructure, socio-cultural constraints, gender disparities, and limited access to resources, hinder the effective adoption of climate-smart practices. The review emphasizes the need for gender-responsive extension programmes, improved access to finance and agricultural inputs, digital literacy, capacity building, participation in farmer organizations, and stronger collaboration among communities, government agencies, NGOs, and research institutions. Strengthening inclusive and gender-sensitive climate-smart extension services can contribute significantly to resilient and sustainable agricultural development and improved rural livelihoods. Keywords: Climate change, Climate-smart agriculture, Extension services, Rural women farmers, Climate resilience, ICT, Sustainable agriculture.","摘要 气候变化对农业生产力、粮食安全和农村生计构成重大威胁，在农业高度依赖气候条件的发展中国家尤为突出。农村女性农民在农业生产、家庭粮食安全、自然资源管理和农村生计中发挥着重要作用，但她们在获取农业资源、气候信息以及技术、金融和推广服务方面往往机会有限。气候智能型农业（climate-smart agriculture, CSA）通过提高生产力、增强气候变化适应力和减少温室气体排放，为解决这些挑战提供了一种途径。本综述考察了气候智能型推广策略在支持农村女性农民适应气候变率方面的作用。综述强调了能力建设与培训、获取及时的气候和天气信息、推广气候韧性技术、农民田间学校、基于数字和信息通信技术的推广服务以及可持续资源管理的重要性。这些策略能够改善女性的知识和技能、增强决策能力、减轻劳动负担、提升粮食和营养安全、增加收入并提高对气候相关冲击的韧性。然而，信息不足、获得信贷和农业投入品的机会有限、数字基础设施薄弱、社会文化制约、性别差距以及资源获取受限等若干挑战，阻碍了气候智能型实践的有效采用。综述强调需要制定性别响应型推广计划、改善融资和农业投入品的获取、提升数字素养、加强能力建设、促进参与农民组织，并加强社区、政府机构、非政府组织和研究机构之间的协作。加强包容性和性别敏感的气候智能型推广服务，能够为韧性和可持续农业发展以及改善农村生计作出重要贡献。关键词：气候变化，气候智能型农业，推广服务，农村女性农民，气候韧性，信息通信技术，可持续农业。","Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)",{"impact":117,"substance":17,"depth":190,"authority":349,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":558},"综述性论文，系统梳理面向农村妇女的气候智慧型推广策略，对农业信息化与性别包容推广有参考价值，但缺乏一手数据，属细分领域进展。",[560],{"name":556,"url":553},[562,563,26,564,565],"农技推广","气候韧性","数字农技服务","农村妇女",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":569},{"candidates":570,"agricultural_evidence":47},[571,575,579,586,593,597],{"code":32,"score":46,"supported":47,"title":572,"abstract":573,"tags":574},[],[133,134,481],[26,563],{"code":200,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":576,"abstract":577,"tags":578},[],[195,218],[],{"code":580,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":581,"abstract":582,"tags":585},"B7",[],[583,584],"温室","greenhouse",[],{"code":587,"score":105,"supported":47,"title":588,"abstract":589,"tags":592},"H8",[],[590,591],"可持续农业","sustainable agriculture",[],{"code":45,"score":61,"supported":47,"title":594,"abstract":595,"tags":596},[],[49],[],{"code":149,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":598,"abstract":599,"tags":600},[],[],[562],[602,603],"气候智慧型农业 农村妇女 推广服务","数字农技服务 气候智慧农业 农技推广 农村妇女","气候智慧型农业农村妇女推广服务-5148","10.5281\u002Fzenodo.23411253",{"doi":605,"openalex_id":607,"authors":608,"venue":556,"cited_by_count":81,"oa_url":553,"card":616,"direction":101,"ingested_from":102},"W7222536550",[609,612,614],{"name":610,"orcid":611},"Shweta Tripathi","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-3310-918X",{"name":613,"orcid":9},"Neha Singh",{"name":615,"orcid":9},"Poonam Singh",{"tldr":617,"method":618,"finding":619,"direction":99,"opportunity":620},"综述气候智慧型推广策略如何帮助农村女性农民适应气候变化。","文献综述，聚焦能力培训、ICT推广、农民田间学校等策略。","性别响应型推广服务可提升女性适应力，但受数字设施与性别差距制约。","可研究面向农村女性的ICT推广服务采纳机制与性别数字鸿沟的量化影响。","2026-10-17T23:30:08.557486Z"]