[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"item-5368":3,"related-5368":92},{"id":4,"title":5,"url":6,"summary":7,"summary_zh":8,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":6,"published_at":11,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":15,"score_detail":16,"sources":23,"tags":25,"primary_topic":31,"secondary_topics":37,"classification":38,"search_phrases":67,"slug":70,"view_count":71,"doi":72,"paper":73,"created_at":91},5368,"The enabling effect of farmers’ cooperatives on the rural collective economy: evidence from China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166","Based on panel data from 30 provinces in China covering the period 2015–2023, this paper examines the impact of farmers’ cooperatives on the rural collective economy and the underlying mechanisms. First, a multidimensional evaluation system is constructed to measure the development levels of farmers’ cooperatives and the rural collective economy. Subsequently, baseline regressions are estimated using a two-way fixed-effects model and the instrumental variables approach, while the underlying mechanisms are systematically identified through moderating-effect models, threshold-effect models, spatial econometric models, and dimension-specific tests. The results indicate that, during the study period, the overall development levels of China’s farmers’ cooperatives and the rural collective economy showed distinct temporal evolutionary characteristics. Specifically, the overall development level of farmers’ cooperatives declined slightly, while the rural collective economy maintained steady growth. Baseline regression results show that the development of farmers’ cooperatives has a significant positive promotional effect on the rural collective economy, and this conclusion remains robust after multiple robustness tests and endogeneity treatments. Mechanism analysis reveals that cooperatives primarily exert their empowering effect through two channels: improving operational performance and promoting industrial upgrading, whereas their effects in dimensions such as standardized operation and service scope are not significant. Heterogeneity tests confirm that this promotional effect exhibits marked regional differentiation, being significant only in the eastern regions and not yet manifested in the central and western regions. Further analysis indicates that the agricultural industry growth rate plays a positive moderating role in the process by which cooperatives empower the collective economy; the level of land transfer exhibits a single-threshold effect, with the cooperative’s promotional effect strengthening significantly once the threshold value is exceeded. Moreover, the development of farmers’ cooperatives exhibits significant positive spatial spillover effects, driving the development of the collective economy in neighboring regions through factor mobility and industrial linkages.","基于2015—2023年中国30个省份的面板数据，本文考察了农民合作社对农村集体经济的影响及其作用机制。首先，构建多维评价体系测度农民合作社与农村集体经济的发展水平。随后，采用双向固定效应模型和工具变量法进行基准回归估计，同时通过调节效应模型、门槛效应模型、空间计量模型及分维度检验系统识别其内在机制。结果表明，研究期内中国农民合作社与农村集体经济的整体发展水平呈现明显的时间演变特征。具体而言，农民合作社整体发展水平略有下降，而农村集体经济保持稳定增长。基准回归结果显示，农民合作社发展对农村集体经济具有显著的正向促进作用，且该结论在多重稳健性检验和内生性处理后依然成立。机制分析发现，合作社主要通过提升经营绩效和促进产业升级两条渠道发挥赋能作用，而在规范运营和服务范围等维度上的效应不显著。异质性检验证实，该促进作用呈现明显的区域分化特征，仅在东部地区显著，中西部地区尚未显现。进一步分析表明，农业产业增长率在合作社赋能集体经济的过程中发挥正向调节作用；土地流转水平呈现单一门槛效应，一旦跨越门槛值，合作社的促进作用显著增强。此外，农民合作社发展具有显著的正向空间溢出效应，通过要素流动和产业关联带动邻近地区集体经济发展。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-19T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,79,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":22},18,22,13,8,1,"基于30省面板数据的实证研究，方法扎实、结论有新意，对合作社赋能集体经济具政策参考价值。",[24],{"name":10,"url":6},[26,27,28,29,30],"乡村振兴","空间溢出","农村集体经济","土地流转","农民合作社",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},"G2","farm-services","社会化服务与规模经营","\u002Ftopic\u002Frural-services\u002Ffarm-services","G",[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":42},"classified","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":43,"agricultural_evidence":46},[44,51,58,62],{"code":32,"score":45,"supported":46,"title":47,"abstract":48,"tags":50},11,true,[],[29,30,49],"land transfer",[30,29],{"code":52,"score":53,"supported":46,"title":54,"abstract":55,"tags":57},"I4",4,[],[56],"空间计量",[27],{"code":36,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":59,"abstract":60,"tags":61},[],[],[26],{"code":63,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":64,"abstract":65,"tags":66},"G4",[],[],[28],[68,69],"农民合作社 农村集体经济","合作社 土地流转 门槛效应","农民合作社农村集体经济-5368",0,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166",{"doi":72,"openalex_id":74,"authors":75,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":83,"card":84,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7222921695",[76,79,81],{"name":77,"orcid":78},"Miao Qian","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0006-6758-2924",{"name":80,"orcid":9},"Xiuyu Huang",{"name":82,"orcid":9},"Jiaomeng Li","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1971166\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":85,"method":86,"finding":87,"direction":88,"opportunity":89},"基于2015–2023年30省面板数据，检验农民合作社对农村集体经济的促进效应及机制。","双向固定效应模型、工具变量法、调节\u002F门槛\u002F空间计量模型及多维评价体系。","合作社通过提升经营绩效与产业升级显著促进集体经济，效应仅东部显著且有正向空间溢出。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可探究中西部效应缺失原因，并引入数字化指标考察合作社信息化对集体经济的赋能路径。","openalex","2026-10-20T23:30:06.525852Z",{"total":93,"page":21,"page_size":93,"items":94},6,[95,154,211,281,343,402],{"id":96,"title":97,"url":98,"summary":99,"summary_zh":100,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":98,"published_at":101,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":102,"score_detail":103,"sources":109,"tags":111,"primary_topic":114,"secondary_topics":115,"classification":116,"search_phrases":129,"slug":132,"view_count":133,"doi":134,"paper":135,"created_at":153},2758,"Heterogeneous impacts and transmission mechanisms of perceived development barriers on cooperative management performance: micro evidence from Shaanxi, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606","Introduction Farmer cooperatives are key to linking smallholders with modern agriculture, yet how different development barriers affect their management performance remains unclear, as prior studies focus mainly on classifying barriers. Methods Using survey data from 1,130 cooperatives in Shaanxi Province, China, this study applies ordinal logistic regression to examine the heterogeneous effects of perceived development barriers on management performance, with stepwise regression and Sobel tests identifying the mediating role of three management practices (strategic planning, resource investment, operational management). Two-period-lagged operating endowments are controlled to address reverse causality. Results The overall effect of barriers is insignificant, but dimensions differ markedly: resource and institutional barriers significantly reduce performance, whereas product-market and human-resource barriers show no overall effect. Management practices act as a channel—resource and institutional barriers exert a negative full mediating effect, product-market barriers a positive suppression effect, and human-resource barriers no effective pathway. Discussion Resource and institutional barriers are hierarchical: members’ insufficient willingness to contribute capital is the primary performance constraint, followed by land-transfer difficulties, while other policy constraints are common baseline conditions rather than core explanatory factors. Endogeneity and robustness tests support these findings.","引言 农民合作社是连接小农户与现代农业的关键，但不同发展障碍如何影响其经营绩效仍不明确，既有研究主要集中于对障碍进行分类。方法 本研究利用中国陕西省1130家合作社的调查数据，采用有序逻辑回归考察感知发展障碍对经营绩效的异质性影响，并通过逐步回归和Sobel检验识别三种管理实践（战略规划、资源投入、运营管理）的中介作用。为处理反向因果问题，研究控制了两期滞后的经营禀赋。结果 障碍的总体效应不显著，但各维度差异明显：资源障碍和制度障碍显著降低绩效，而产品市场障碍和人力资源障碍未表现出总体效应。管理实践发挥渠道作用——资源障碍和制度障碍产生负向完全中介效应，产品市场障碍产生正向抑制效应，人力资源障碍则无有效路径。讨论 资源障碍和制度障碍具有层级性：成员出资意愿不足是首要绩效约束，其次是土地流转困难，而其他政策约束属于常见基线条件而非核心解释因素。内生性和稳健性检验支持上述发现。","2026-09-16T00:00:00Z",75,{"impact":104,"substance":105,"depth":106,"authority":19,"freshness":107,"relevant":21,"comment":108},15,21,17,9,"基于陕西1130家合作社微观调查，揭示资源与制度壁垒对经营绩效的异质性影响及管理实践中介机制，样本规模与方法设计扎实，对合作社扶持政策有参考价值。",[110],{"name":10,"url":98},[26,112,29,30,113],"农业社会化服务","农业经营主体",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":117},{"candidates":118,"agricultural_evidence":46},[119,125],{"code":32,"score":120,"supported":46,"title":121,"abstract":122,"tags":124},12,[],[29,30,123],"小农户",[112,113,30,29],{"code":36,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":126,"abstract":127,"tags":128},[],[],[26],[130,131],"农业社会化服务 农业经营主体 农民合作社 乡村振兴","农业社会化服务 农业经营主体","农业社会化服务农业经营主体农民合作社乡村振兴-2758",2,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606",{"doi":134,"openalex_id":136,"authors":137,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":147,"card":148,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7213418458",[138,141,143,145],{"name":139,"orcid":140},"Shihan Chen","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-9790-3174",{"name":142,"orcid":9},"Sihan Jiang",{"name":144,"orcid":9},"Haiyan Wang",{"name":146,"orcid":9},"Jikun Ma","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1934606\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":149,"method":150,"finding":151,"direction":88,"opportunity":152},"基于陕西1130家合作社调查，分析感知发展障碍对管理绩效的异质性影响及传导机制。","有序Logistic回归、逐步回归与Sobel检验，控制两期滞后经营禀赋。","资源与制度障碍显著降低绩效，管理实践起中介作用，成员出资意愿不足是首要约束。","可探究数字技术能否缓解资源与制度障碍，并优化合作社管理实践的中介路径。","2026-09-17T23:30:08.060675Z",{"id":155,"title":156,"url":157,"summary":158,"summary_zh":159,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":157,"published_at":160,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":161,"score_detail":162,"sources":165,"tags":167,"primary_topic":172,"secondary_topics":173,"classification":174,"search_phrases":191,"slug":194,"view_count":71,"doi":195,"paper":196,"created_at":210},4868,"Farmers market as public quick commerce infrastructure: a conceptual policy framework for digital transformation","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966579","The rapid digitalization of food retail through private quick commerce platforms has transformed urban food consumption patterns in India. Despite the investments in digital infrastructure, Uzhavar Sandhai (Farmers Market), a farmer-to-consumer direct marketing system in Tamil Nadu, is still limited to traditional physical markets. This study suggests a strategic rethinking of Farmers Market as a public quick commerce infrastructure layer, incorporating digital marketplaces, hyperlocal logistics and cooperative governance to boost farmer market competitiveness and promote public value, food system resilience and equitable digital market access. In this study, the Farmers Market Digital Platform model is developed by applying the conceptual policy design approach to convert the Farmers Market platform into a decentralized public quick commerce network. This study identifies the institutional, technological and governance reforms necessary to support the digital transformation of farmer markets using publicly governed digital infrastructure. This reorientation of Farmers Market to public digital infrastructure could form the policy roadmap for platformization of agriculture in Tamil Nadu, which would benefit small farmers, urban consumers, and municipalities and help alleviate inefficiencies in supply chains. As a conceptual policy framework, the proposed model has not been empirically tested and requires future pilot implementation and validation before adoption. The study contributes to the evolving literature on agricultural digitalization by offering a vision for the potential redesign of existing public agricultural markets as digitally enabled public service infrastructure, which can enhance farmer welfare and urban food system resilience.","印度食品零售通过私营即时商务平台的快速数字化，已改变了城市食品消费模式。尽管在数字基础设施方面已有投入，泰米尔纳德邦的“乌扎瓦尔桑代”（Uzhavar Sandhai，即农民市场）——一种农民对消费者的直接营销体系——仍局限于传统的实体市场。本研究建议对农民市场进行战略性的重新思考，将其打造为公共即时商务基础设施层，融合数字市场、超本地物流与合作治理，以提升农民市场的竞争力，并促进公共价值、食物系统韧性以及公平的数字市场准入。本研究运用概念性政策设计方法，构建了农民市场数字平台模型，将农民市场平台转化为去中心化的公共即时商务网络。本研究识别了支持农民市场数字化转型所必需的制度、技术与治理改革，以依托公共治理的数字基础设施加以推进。将农民市场重新定位为公共数字基础设施，可为泰米尔纳德邦农业的平台化提供政策路线图，惠及小农户、城市消费者和市政当局，并有助于缓解供应链中的低效问题。作为一个概念性政策框架，所提出的模型尚未经过实证检验，在采纳之前需要未来的试点实施与验证。本研究为农业数字化领域不断发展的文献作出了贡献，提出了一种愿景，即把现有公共农业市场重新设计为数字赋能的公共服务基础设施，从而提升农民福利与城市食物系统韧性。","2026-10-13T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":163,"substance":105,"depth":106,"authority":19,"freshness":107,"relevant":21,"comment":164},16,"提出将农民市场重构为公共即时零售数字基础设施的政策框架，视角新颖但属概念性研究、未经实证检验，对国内农业数字化政策设计有借鉴价值。",[166],{"name":10,"url":157},[168,169,30,170,171],"数字乡村","农产品流通","农业平台化","公共数字基础设施",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":175},{"candidates":176,"agricultural_evidence":46},[177,181,186],{"code":32,"score":53,"supported":46,"title":178,"abstract":179,"tags":180},[],[123],[30],{"code":182,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":183,"abstract":184,"tags":185},"E5",[],[],[169],{"code":187,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":188,"abstract":189,"tags":190},"I6",[],[],[168],[192,193],"Uzhavar Sandhai 农民市场","Tamil Nadu 农业数字化","UzhavarSandhai农民市场-4868","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966579",{"doi":195,"openalex_id":197,"authors":198,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":204,"card":205,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7221594564",[199,201],{"name":200,"orcid":9},"Arunachalam Panchatcharam SriVidhya",{"name":202,"orcid":203},"Paul J. Mansingh","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3423-8618","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1966579\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":206,"method":207,"finding":208,"direction":88,"opportunity":209},"提出将印度农民市场重构为公共快速商业基础设施的政策框架。","概念性政策设计方法，构建农民市场数字平台模型。","需制度、技术与治理改革，将农民市场转为去中心化公共快速商业网络。","该框架未经实证，可开展试点验证，并探索公共数字平台对小农福利与供应链效率的影响。","2026-10-14T23:30:06.797196Z",{"id":212,"title":213,"url":214,"summary":215,"summary_zh":216,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":214,"published_at":217,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":218,"score_detail":219,"sources":221,"tags":223,"primary_topic":227,"secondary_topics":228,"classification":229,"search_phrases":249,"slug":252,"view_count":71,"doi":253,"paper":254,"created_at":280},4482,"Development and validation of a multidimensional behavioural change index and its application to farmer producer organisations in India: implications for sustainable smallholder food systems","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1915367","Realising the Sustainable Development Goals in ending poverty (SDG 1), achieving zero hunger through sustainable agriculture (SDG 2), and reducing inequalities (SDG 10) hinges on the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers, and Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) are widely promoted to strengthen it, yet their evaluation has concentrated on short-term economic gains, neglecting the behavioural transformation that sustains improvement and underpins resilient food systems, and limited validated multidimensional instruments are available to measure such behavioural differences across farmers. This study developed a Behavioural Change Index (BCI) and applied it to examine the association between FPO membership and farmer behvioural status in Odisha, India. An initial pool of 142 items was refined to 89 items across twelve theoretically grounded, expert-weighted dimensions through relevancy analysis by an 80-member expert panel, reliability testing, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability, average variance extracted, measurement invariance, discriminant validity and common-method-bias assessment, after which the index was applied to 300 FPO members and 100 non-members, with selection bias addressed through propensity-score matching, inverse-probability weighting, kernel and full matching, doubly-robust estimation and E-value sensitivity analysis. The BCI demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), a clean twelve-factor structure explaining 68.3% of variance, and satisfactory discriminant validity; members scored significantly higher across all twelve dimensions(Cohen’s d = 1.29–2.21) and the raw advantage of 22.12 points remained robust after matching (19.34 points; doubly-robust ATT = 19.71; E -value = 6.69), indicating minimal sensitivity to unmeasured confounding. The cross-sectional study thus delivers both a psychometrically supported instrument and robust observational evidence of differences in behavioural status between FPO members and non-members after adjustment for observed covariates. By rendering behavioural status measurable, the BCI enables agencies to monitor progress beyond income and target support effectively, advancing the transition toward sustainable, equitable and resilient smallholder food systems.","实现消除贫困（可持续发展目标1）、通过可持续农业实现零饥饿（可持续发展目标2）以及减少不平等（可持续发展目标10），关键在于小农户的适应能力，而农民生产者组织（Farmer Producer Organisations, FPOs）被广泛推广以增强这一能力，然而对其评估一直集中于短期经济收益，忽视了支撑持续改善和韧性食物系统的行为转变，且可用于测量农户间此类行为差异的经过验证的多维工具十分有限。本研究开发了行为变化指数（Behavioural Change Index, BCI），并将其应用于印度奥里萨邦，以考察FPO成员身份与农户行为状况之间的关联。初始的142个题项经由80人专家组的关联性分析、信度检验、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析、组合信度、平均方差抽取量、测量不变性、区分效度及共同方法偏差评估，在十二个有理论依据且经专家赋权的维度上精炼为89个题项，随后将该指数应用于300名FPO成员和100名非成员，并通过倾向得分匹配、逆概率加权、核匹配和全匹配、双重稳健估计及E值敏感性分析来处理选择偏差。BCI表现出极好的信度（Cronbach's α = 0.95）、清晰的十二因子结构（解释68.3%的方差）以及令人满意的区分效度；成员在所有十二个维度上的得分均显著更高（Cohen's d = 1.29–2.21），22.12分的原始优势在匹配后依然稳健（19.34分；双重稳健ATT = 19.71；E值 = 6.69），表明对未测量混杂因素的敏感性极低。因此，这项横断面研究既提供了一种心理测量学支持的测量工具，也提供了在调整可观测协变量后FPO成员与非成员之间行为状况差异的稳健观察证据。通过使行为状况可测量，BCI使各机构能够监测收入之外的进展并有效定向支持，从而推进小农户食物系统向可持续、公平和有韧性的方向转型。","2026-10-08T00:00:00Z",74,{"impact":120,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":107,"relevant":21,"comment":220},"该研究开发了行为改变指数并验证其对印度小农组织成员行为差异的测量，方法严谨、数据扎实，对可持续小农食物系统评估有参考价值，但地域限于印度、影响层级偏学术细分领域。",[222],{"name":10,"url":214},[123,224,225,30,226],"可持续农业","印度农业","行为改变指数",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":230},{"candidates":231,"agricultural_evidence":46},[232,237,244],{"code":32,"score":163,"supported":46,"title":233,"abstract":235,"tags":236},[234],"smallholder",[123,234],[30,123],{"code":238,"score":239,"supported":46,"title":240,"abstract":241,"tags":243},"H8",7,[],[224,242],"sustainable agriculture",[224],{"code":245,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":246,"abstract":247,"tags":248},"J3",[],[],[225],[250,251],"行为改变指数 农民合作社 可持续农业 印度农业","行为改变指数 农民合作社","行为改变指数农民合作社可持续农业印度农业-4482","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1915367",{"doi":253,"openalex_id":255,"authors":256,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":214,"card":275,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7221022600",[257,259,261,264,267,269,271,273],{"name":258,"orcid":9},"Badigi Pavan Naik",{"name":260,"orcid":9},"Mahamaya Prasad Nayak",{"name":262,"orcid":263},"Bishnupriya Mishra","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0007-6590-8967",{"name":265,"orcid":266},"Abhiram Dash","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0002-6683-6594",{"name":268,"orcid":9},"Khitish Kumar Sarangi",{"name":270,"orcid":9},"Madhumita Jena",{"name":272,"orcid":9},"Indira Priyadarsini Pattnaik",{"name":274,"orcid":9},"Srabani Ghosal",{"tldr":276,"method":277,"finding":278,"direction":88,"opportunity":279},"构建并验证多维行为改变指数，评估印度农民生产者组织成员的行为差异。","专家赋权、因子分析、倾向得分匹配等，调查300名成员与100名非成员。","指数信效度良好，成员在12个维度均显著更高，匹配后优势仍稳健。","可将该行为指数嵌入数字平台，用于小农户行为监测与精准干预评估。","2026-10-09T23:30:06.254620Z",{"id":282,"title":283,"url":284,"summary":285,"summary_zh":286,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":284,"published_at":287,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":46,"score":288,"score_detail":289,"sources":292,"tags":294,"primary_topic":299,"secondary_topics":300,"classification":301,"search_phrases":318,"slug":321,"view_count":133,"doi":322,"paper":323,"created_at":342},4331,"Does rural land transfer promote high-quality agriculture development? Empirical evidence from 30 provinces in China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003","As a fundamental pathway toward agricultural-scale operations, rural land transfer (RLT) has emerged as an important institutional mechanism for promoting high-quality agricultural development (HQAD). However, how to effectively unleash the productive potential of land resources and align RLT with the objectives of high-quality development remains an important research question. Treating the 2010 national regulatory intensification of rural land transfer as a common policy milestone, this study employs a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) model and a mediating effect model to examine the relationship between RLT intensity and HQAD and to explore the potential transmission role of new agricultural business entities (NABE). The results show that the overall level of HQAD in China has steadily improved, although substantial spatial and temporal disparities remain, with HQAD generally decreasing from the eastern to the central and western regions. The continuous DID estimates indicate a significant positive association between RLT intensity and HQAD after the 2010 national regulatory-intensification milestone, and this relationship remains stable across the reported robustness checks. The mediation analysis provides evidence consistent with a potential transmission pathway through new agricultural business entities (NABE). Furthermore, the estimated association between RLT intensity and HQAD is stronger in the central region and in non-major grain-producing areas.","作为农业规模化经营的基础路径，农地流转(rural land transfer, RLT)已成为推动农业高质量发展(high-quality agricultural development, HQAD)的重要制度安排。然而，如何有效释放土地资源的生产潜力，使农地流转与高质量发展目标相契合，仍是一个重要的研究问题。本研究以2010年国家加强农地流转监管为共同政策节点，采用连续型双重差分(continuous difference-in-differences, DID)模型和中介效应模型，考察农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间的关系，并探讨新型农业经营主体(new agricultural business entities, NABE)可能的中介传导作用。结果表明，中国农业高质量发展总体水平稳步提升，但仍存在显著的空间和时间差异，农业高质量发展水平总体呈东、中、西部递减态势。连续型双重差分估计表明，在2010年国家加强监管这一政策节点之后，农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间存在显著正相关关系，且该关系在各项稳健性检验中保持稳定。中介分析提供了与新型农业经营主体潜在传导路径相一致的证据。此外，农地流转强度与农业高质量发展之间的估计关联在中部地区和非粮食主产区更强。","2026-10-06T00:00:00Z",81,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":290,"freshness":107,"relevant":21,"comment":291},14,"基于30省面板数据的连续DID实证研究，方法规范、结论有政策参考价值，但属学术论文而非产业动态，适合主题聚合而非头条精选。",[293],{"name":10,"url":284},[295,296,297,298,29],"农业高质量发展","新型农业经营主体","粮食主产区","双重差分",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":302},{"candidates":303,"agricultural_evidence":46},[304,308,313],{"code":32,"score":19,"supported":46,"title":305,"abstract":306,"tags":307},[49],[49],[29,296],{"code":309,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":310,"abstract":311,"tags":312},"A8",[],[],[297],{"code":314,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":315,"abstract":316,"tags":317},"J2",[],[],[295],[319,320],"农村土地流转 农业高质量发展","新型农业经营主体 中介效应","农村土地流转农业高质量发展-4331","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003",{"doi":322,"openalex_id":324,"authors":325,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":336,"card":337,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7220726312",[326,328,330,332,334],{"name":327,"orcid":9},"Tian Tian",{"name":329,"orcid":9},"Jiawei Yang",{"name":331,"orcid":9},"Tong Yu",{"name":333,"orcid":9},"李孟然",{"name":335,"orcid":9},"Zhen Xie","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1940003\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":338,"method":339,"finding":340,"direction":88,"opportunity":341},"用连续DID和中介模型检验农村土地流转对农业高质量发展的影响及新型经营主体的中介作用。","2010年政策节点，连续DID与中介效应模型，中国30省面板数据。","土地流转显著促进农业高质量发展，新型经营主体起中介作用，中西部及非主产区效应更强。","可结合数字技术或信息化服务，探究土地流转通过新型经营主体推动农业高质量发展的数字化路径。","2026-10-07T23:30:06.424093Z",{"id":344,"title":345,"url":346,"summary":347,"summary_zh":348,"content":9,"source_name":10,"source_url":346,"published_at":349,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":350,"score_detail":351,"sources":353,"tags":355,"primary_topic":360,"secondary_topics":361,"classification":362,"search_phrases":380,"slug":383,"view_count":133,"doi":384,"paper":385,"created_at":401},3872,"Land resource misallocation and rural household development resilience in China’s urban–rural transition","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1933343","Market-oriented land allocation is central to rural development, household welfare, and food system stability in developing countries, yet spatial governance failures in China’s urban–rural transition raise concerns about how land resource misallocation, the price distortion between industrial and commercial\u002Fresidential land created by local governments’ land-driven development strategy, affects rural household development resilience, defined as the ability of households to resist risks, adapt to changes, and achieve sustainable recovery in the face of external shocks, and who is left behind. Few studies have rigorously examined the link between misallocation and resilience, tested income diversity as a channel, or explored environmental perception as a moderator. Using China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) data (2012–2022) and provincial land transaction records, this study constructs household-level development resilience measures and employs two-way fixed effects, mediation, and moderation models to examine the association between land resource misallocation and rural household development resilience. The findings are as follows. (1) Land resource misallocation is robustly negatively associated with household development resilience; a one-unit increase in misallocation is associated with a 0.002-unit reduction in resilience, robust to instrumental variable estimation and multiple robustness checks. (2) Income diversity plays a partial mediating role, but its effect is paradoxical: land resource misallocation nominally increases the number of income sources, yet does so by displacing stable property and operating income with low-end precarious employment, creating a “false diversity” of more sources but lower quality that ultimately weakens rather than strengthens resilience. (3) Environmental risk perception positively moderates this relationship; the negative association weakens as environmental risk perception rises, consistent with an interpretation of perception as cognitive adaptive capacity. (4) The negative association is more pronounced among households with higher education, higher dependency ratios, agricultural employment, and exclusion from land transfer markets. These findings highlight that land governance reforms must move beyond factor allocation efficiency to incorporate livelihood ability, food-access capacity, and household development resilience goals.","以市场为导向的土地配置对发展中国家的农村发展、家庭福利和粮食体系稳定至关重要，然而中国城乡转型中的空间治理失灵引发了诸多担忧：土地资源错配——即地方政府土地驱动发展战略所造成的工业用地与商住用地之间的价格扭曲——如何影响农村家庭发展韧性（指家庭在面对外部冲击时抵御风险、适应变化并实现可持续恢复的能力），以及谁被遗留在后。鲜有研究严格考察错配与韧性之间的关联、检验收入多样性作为中介渠道的作用，或探讨环境感知作为调节变量的影响。本研究利用中国家庭追踪调查（CFPS）数据（2012—2022年）和省级土地交易记录，构建家庭层面的发展韧性指标，并采用双向固定效应、中介效应和调节效应模型，考察土地资源错配与农村家庭发展韧性之间的关联。研究发现如下。（1）土地资源错配与家庭发展韧性之间存在稳健的负向关联；错配每增加一个单位，韧性与之相关地下降0.002个单位，该结果在工具变量估计和多项稳健性检验下依然成立。（2）收入多样性发挥部分中介作用，但其效应具有悖论性：土地资源错配名义上增加了收入来源数量，然而其实质是以低端不稳定就业替代了稳定的财产性收入和经营性收入，形成了一种“虚假多样性”——来源更多但质量更低，最终削弱而非增强韧性。（3）环境风险感知对这一关系具有正向调节作用；随着环境风险感知的提高，负向关联减弱，这与将感知视为认知适应能力的解释相一致。（4）这一负向关联在受教育程度较高、抚养比较高、从事农业就业以及被排斥于土地流转市场之外的家庭中更为显著。上述发现表明，土地治理改革必须超越要素配置效率的范畴，将生计能力、粮食获取能力和家庭发展韧性目标纳入其中。","2026-09-30T00:00:00Z",80,{"impact":17,"substance":18,"depth":17,"authority":19,"freshness":107,"relevant":21,"comment":352},"基于CFPS与省级土地交易数据的实证研究，揭示土地资源错配通过“虚假多样性”削弱农户发展韧性，结论对土地治理改革有参考价值。",[354],{"name":10,"url":346},[356,29,357,358,359],"城乡融合","土地资源配置","农户发展韧性","收入多样性",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":363},{"candidates":364,"agricultural_evidence":46},[365,369,375],{"code":32,"score":239,"supported":46,"title":366,"abstract":367,"tags":368},[],[29,49],[29],{"code":36,"score":93,"supported":46,"title":370,"abstract":371,"tags":374},[],[372,373],"农村发展","rural development",[],{"code":376,"score":21,"supported":14,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":379},"G5",[],[],[356],[381,382],"CFPS 土地资源错配 农户韧性","城乡转型 土地交易 农村家庭","CFPS土地资源错配农户韧性-3872","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1933343",{"doi":384,"openalex_id":386,"authors":387,"venue":10,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":346,"card":396,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7214941402",[388,390,393],{"name":389,"orcid":9},"Jinqiong Ouyang",{"name":391,"orcid":392},"Yu HE","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0000-2650-7801",{"name":394,"orcid":395},"Yihang Hu","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-3674-2308",{"tldr":397,"method":398,"finding":399,"direction":88,"opportunity":400},"基于CFPS与省级土地交易数据，揭示土地资源错配如何削弱中国农村家庭发展韧性。","CFPS 2012–2022面板数据、省级土地交易记录，双向固定效应、中介与调节","土地错配显著降低家庭韧性，收入多样性呈“虚假多样化”中介，环境风险感知起正向调节。","可探究数字技术或土地流转市场信息化能否缓解错配、提升收入质量与家庭韧性。","2026-10-01T23:30:07.151101Z",{"id":403,"title":404,"url":405,"summary":406,"summary_zh":407,"content":9,"source_name":408,"source_url":405,"published_at":409,"category":12,"cover_url":9,"hotness":13,"is_selected":14,"score":410,"score_detail":411,"sources":413,"tags":415,"primary_topic":418,"secondary_topics":419,"classification":420,"search_phrases":437,"slug":440,"view_count":133,"doi":441,"paper":442,"created_at":454},3678,"An exploration of sustainable scaled-up operations for smallholder farms in China: drawing on international experience","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893","China’s persistent smallholder farming structure presents a major challenge for agricultural modernisation. This study adopts a farm management perspective, using smallholder farmers as the main micro-level analytical unit, to explore viable paths for achieving sustainable agricultural structural transformation in China. The core contradiction facing China’s agricultural development—the ‘Smallholder Dilemma’—is conceptualised as four interrelated structural constraints: insufficient cropland per household unit, fragmentation of land holdings leading to a significant increase in production costs, acceleration of land de-agriculture, and systematic failure of land mobility policies. International comparative analyses suggest that major advances in agricultural modernisation have often occurred alongside improvements in land governance, market institutions, agricultural service systems, and the organisation of production; however, the country cases do not establish a universal causal sequence or a directly transferable quantitative benchmark. Based on these findings, this study proposes a three-stage institutional framework tailored to China’s context. The framework emphasises improving land transfer and service-market mechanisms in the short term, establishing a rights-protective and voluntary push–pull mechanism to support agricultural transition in the medium term, and promoting diversified agricultural production entities and organisational innovation in the long term.","中国持续存在的小农经营结构对农业现代化构成重大挑战。本研究从农场管理视角出发，以小农作为主要微观分析单元，探讨中国实现可持续农业结构转型的可行路径。中国农业发展面临的核心矛盾——“小农困境”——被概念化为四个相互关联的结构性约束：户均耕地不足、土地细碎化导致生产成本显著上升、土地去农业化加速，以及土地流转政策的系统性失灵。国际比较分析表明，农业现代化的重大进展往往伴随着土地治理、市场制度、农业服务体系和生产组织的改善；然而，国别案例并不能确立普遍的因果顺序或可直接移植的量化基准。基于上述发现，本研究提出了一个针对中国情境的三阶段制度框架。该框架强调：短期内完善土地流转和服务市场机制；中期建立权利保障型和自愿性的推拉机制以支持农业转型；长期促进多元化农业生产主体和组织创新。","Cogent Food & Agriculture","2026-09-25T00:00:00Z",77,{"impact":17,"substance":105,"depth":106,"authority":19,"freshness":20,"relevant":21,"comment":412},"从农场管理视角系统剖析中国小农困境并提出三阶段制度框架，国际比较扎实，对农业现代化与土地政策研究有参考价值。",[414],{"name":408,"url":405},[123,416,112,29,417],"农业现代化","土地治理",{"code":32,"slug":33,"name":34,"path":35,"parent_code":36},[],{"status":39,"locked":14,"version":40,"method":41,"evidence":421},{"candidates":422,"agricultural_evidence":46},[423,428,432],{"code":32,"score":424,"supported":46,"title":425,"abstract":426,"tags":427},20,[234],[29,234,49],[112,29,123],{"code":314,"score":53,"supported":46,"title":429,"abstract":430,"tags":431},[],[416],[416],{"code":238,"score":433,"supported":46,"title":434,"abstract":435,"tags":436},3,[],[224],[],[438,439],"小农户 土地流转 农业现代化","小农困境 土地治理","小农户土地流转农业现代化-3678","10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893",{"doi":441,"openalex_id":443,"authors":444,"venue":408,"cited_by_count":71,"oa_url":448,"card":449,"direction":88,"ingested_from":90},"W7214366575",[445],{"name":446,"orcid":447},"Yujia Huo","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0009-0005-2578-2859","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tandfonline.com\u002Fdoi\u002Fpdf\u002F10.1080\u002F23311932.2026.2736893?needAccess=true",{"tldr":450,"method":451,"finding":452,"direction":88,"opportunity":453},"基于农场管理视角，分析中国小农困境并借鉴国际经验提出三阶段制度框架。","国际比较分析与制度经济学框架，以小农为微观分析单元。","小农困境源于四重结构约束，需分短期、中期、长期三阶段制度创新。","可探究数字平台与土地流转、服务市场机制结合如何缓解小农困境。","2026-09-28T23:30:42.560643Z"]