[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"topic-fsQCA":3},{"name":4,"kind":5,"tokens":6,"total":7,"page":8,"page_size":9,"items":10},"fsQCA","tag",[4],7,1,100,[11,81,140,181,225,287,331],{"id":12,"title":13,"url":14,"summary":15,"summary_zh":16,"content":17,"source_name":18,"source_url":14,"published_at":19,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":23,"score_detail":24,"sources":31,"tags":33,"primary_topic":17,"secondary_topics":38,"classification":39,"search_phrases":56,"slug":59,"view_count":8,"doi":60,"paper":61,"created_at":80},4872,"Forest-food supply chain resilience in mountain outdoor regions: a reconfigurability perspective","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1962537","Introduction Forest-based food supply chains face ecological seasonality, dispersed production, perishability, and uneven transport access. This study examines how organizational capabilities combine to support forest-based food supply-chain resilience (FFSCR) from a reconfigurability perspective. Methods The analysis draws on 409 managerial questionnaires nested within 50 firms in Zhangjiajie, Xishuangbanna, and Changbai Mountain. Measurement quality was evaluated at the respondent level, and construct scores were aggregated to the firm level, supported by ICC(1) values of 0.251–0.342 and ICC(2) values of 0.732–0.809. Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) were applied to examine necessary constraints and sufficient configurations. Results Reconfiguration readiness was the only condition meeting both the substantive and statistical NCA criteria ( d = 0.123, p \u003C 0.001) and the fsQCA necessity criterion (consistency = 0.921; coverage = 0.848). Five intermediate configurations generated high FFSCR, with overall consistency of 0.945 and coverage of 0.883. Reconfiguration readiness appeared in all five configurations, while partner resilience was a core condition in four. Robustness checks using 90th\u002F70th\u002F10th-percentile recalibration reproduced the five configurations (consistency = 0.950; coverage = 0.886) and maintained the necessity of reconfiguration readiness (NCA d = 0.110, p \u003C 0.001; fsQCA consistency = 0.926). Discussion Reconfiguration readiness functions as an enabling constraint rather than a sufficient condition on its own. Relational, agile, financial, flexible, and technological capabilities provide alternative mechanisms through which firms convert readiness into resilient supply-chain performance.","引言 林源食品供应链面临生态季节性、生产分散性、易腐性以及运输可达性不均等挑战。本研究从可重构性视角出发，考察组织能力如何组合以支撑林源食品供应链韧性（forest-based food supply-chain resilience, FFSCR）。方法 分析基于张家界、西双版纳和长白山地区50家企业中嵌套的409份管理者问卷。测量质量在受访者层面进行评估，并将构念得分聚合至企业层面，得到ICC(1)值为0.251–0.342、ICC(2)值为0.732–0.809的支持。采用必要条件分析（Necessary Condition Analysis, NCA）与模糊集定性比较分析（fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, fsQCA）检验必要约束条件与充分组态。结果 可重构准备度是唯一同时满足NCA实质性与统计性标准（d = 0.123, p \u003C 0.001）以及fsQCA必要性标准（一致性 = 0.921；覆盖度 = 0.848）的条件。五种中间组态产生了高FFSCR，总体一致性为0.945，覆盖度为0.883。可重构准备度出现在全部五种组态中，而合作伙伴韧性在四种组态中为核心条件。采用第90\u002F70\u002F10百分位重新校准的稳健性检验复现了这五种组态（一致性 = 0.950；覆盖度 = 0.886），并维持了可重构准备度的必要性（NCA d = 0.110, p \u003C 0.001；fsQCA一致性 = 0.926）。讨论 可重构准备度发挥使能约束的作用，而非自身即为充分条件。关系能力、敏捷能力、财务能力、灵活能力与技术能力提供了替代机制，使企业将准备度转化为韧性供应链绩效。",null,"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","2026-10-13T00:00:00Z","论文",10,false,74,{"impact":25,"substance":26,"depth":27,"authority":28,"freshness":29,"relevant":8,"comment":30},12,22,18,13,9,"基于三地50家企业409份问卷的fsQCA实证研究，方法规范、结论有新意，但属细分领域学术成果，公共影响有限，适合作为专业向精选。",[32],{"name":18,"url":14},[34,35,36,4,37],"供应链韧性","林下经济","农业经营主体","森林食品",[],{"status":40,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":43},"needs_review","2026-10-22.2","rules",{"candidates":44,"agricultural_evidence":22,"reason":55},[45,50],{"code":46,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":47,"abstract":48,"tags":49},"G2",[],[],[36],{"code":51,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":52,"abstract":53,"tags":54},"G4",[],[],[35],"农业相关性需要复核",[57,58],"张家界 西双版纳 长白山 森林食品","森林食品 供应链韧性 组织能力","张家界西双版纳长白山森林食品-4872","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1962537",{"doi":60,"openalex_id":62,"authors":63,"venue":18,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":14,"card":73,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},"W7221622529",[64,66,68,70],{"name":65,"orcid":17},"Qianlan Chen",{"name":67,"orcid":17},"Huan Liang",{"name":69,"orcid":17},"Xi Deng",{"name":71,"orcid":17},"Yuelin Ren",0,{"tldr":74,"method":75,"finding":76,"direction":77,"opportunity":78},"基于可重构视角，研究山区林下食品供应链韧性如何由多种组织能力组合形成。","409份管理者问卷、50家企业，用NCA与fsQCA分析必要条件与充分组态。","可重构准备度是唯一必要条件，五条组态路径均含该条件，伙伴韧性在四条中为核心。","数字乡村与农业信息化","可将可重构准备度与数字技术能力结合，探索山区林下食品供应链的数字化韧性组态机制。","openalex","2026-10-14T23:30:07.087827Z",{"id":82,"title":83,"url":84,"summary":85,"summary_zh":86,"content":17,"source_name":18,"source_url":84,"published_at":87,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":88,"score_detail":89,"sources":93,"tags":95,"primary_topic":17,"secondary_topics":100,"classification":101,"search_phrases":113,"slug":116,"view_count":117,"doi":118,"paper":119,"created_at":139},4335,"Post-relocation livelihood adaptation among resettled households in karst mountainous areas: outcomes, associated factors, and configurations in Guizhou Province, China","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1922524","Introduction Improving livelihood adaptation outcomes are crucial for relocated households to achieve sustainable development and consolidate poverty alleviation gains. Methods Using survey data from relocated households in karst mountainous areas, this study constructs a multidimensional livelihood adaptation outcomes index via the CRITIC method and combines OPGD and fsQCA to examine associated factors and configurational patterns. Results (1) There is a significant disparity in the outcomes of livelihood adaptation following relocation: although overall adaptation results are moderate, progress in psychological and living adaptation outcomes have far outpaced recovery in economic and occupational aspects. (2) Households show marked differences across all dimensions, with employment adaptation gap being the largest. (3) Income level, insurance coverage, and health status are the strongest associated factors; factor interactions generally enhance explanatory power. (4) The improvement of livelihood adaptation outcomes does not depend on a single dominant factor. Rather, six equivalent configurational pathways are formed through the nonlinear interaction of multiple conditions, jointly contributing to high levels of adaptation outcomes. Discussion Follow-up support policies for relocated households in karst mountainous areas should be based on the synergistic pattern of multiple associated factors, adopt targeted measures, formulate differentiated plans according to the resource characteristics of farming households, and select adaptive configurations associated with high livelihood adaptation outcomes in a coordinated manner, thereby strengthening the foundation for sustainable livelihoods among relocated households.","引言 改善生计适应结果对于搬迁户实现可持续发展和巩固脱贫成果至关重要。方法 本研究利用喀斯特山区搬迁户的调查数据，通过CRITIC法构建多维生计适应结果指数，并结合OPGD和fsQCA方法考察相关因素及组态模式。结果 （1）搬迁后生计适应结果存在显著差异：尽管整体适应结果处于中等水平，但心理和生活适应结果的进展远超经济与职业方面的恢复。（2）各维度上农户间差异明显，其中就业适应差距最大。（3）收入水平、保险覆盖和健康状况是最强的相关因素；因素交互作用总体上增强了解释力。（4）生计适应结果的改善并不依赖于单一主导因素，而是通过多条件的非线性交互形成六条等效组态路径，共同促成高水平的适应结果。讨论 喀斯特山区搬迁户的后续扶持政策应基于多相关因素的协同模式，采取针对性措施，根据农户资源特征制定差异化方案，并协调选择与高生计适应结果相关的适应性组态，从而夯实搬迁户可持续生计的基础。","2026-10-06T00:00:00Z",72,{"impact":25,"substance":90,"depth":91,"authority":28,"freshness":29,"relevant":8,"comment":92},21,17,"以贵州喀斯特山区搬迁户调查数据构建多维生计适应指数并结合OPGD与fsQCA识别组态路径，方法有新意、结论对后续帮扶政策有参考价值，但属区域案例研究，影响范围有限。",[94],{"name":18,"url":84},[96,97,98,99,4],"易地搬迁","可持续生计","喀斯特山区","农户生计",[],{"status":102,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":103},"unclassified",{"candidates":104,"agricultural_evidence":111,"reason":112},[105],{"code":106,"score":107,"supported":22,"title":108,"abstract":109,"tags":110},"G6",2,[],[],[99,96],true,"缺少足够的主题证据",[114,115],"贵州 喀斯特山区 易地搬迁 农户生计","可持续生计 喀斯特山区 农户生计 易地搬迁","贵州喀斯特山区易地搬迁农户生计-4335",3,"10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1922524",{"doi":118,"openalex_id":120,"authors":121,"venue":18,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":133,"card":134,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},"W7220742647",[122,124,126,129,131],{"name":123,"orcid":17},"Ding Ding",{"name":125,"orcid":17},"Zhongfa Zhou",{"name":127,"orcid":128},"Fang Tang","https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4485-414X",{"name":130,"orcid":17},"Yongliu Yang",{"name":132,"orcid":17},"Tengxian Zhang","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fsustainable-food-systems\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1922524\u002Fpdf",{"tldr":135,"method":136,"finding":137,"direction":77,"opportunity":138},"基于贵州喀斯特山区搬迁户调查，评估其生计适应结果并识别影响因素与组态路径。","CRITIC法构建多维适应指数，结合OPGD与fsQCA分析影响因素及组态。","适应结果总体中等，心理与生活适应快于经济与职业；六条等效组态路径共同促成高适应。","可引入数字技能与信息可及性变量，探究数字赋能如何与生计资本组态协同提升搬迁户适应结果。","2026-10-07T23:30:06.701190Z",{"id":141,"title":142,"url":143,"summary":144,"summary_zh":17,"content":17,"source_name":145,"source_url":17,"published_at":146,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":23,"score_detail":147,"sources":152,"tags":154,"primary_topic":17,"secondary_topics":159,"classification":160,"search_phrases":168,"slug":171,"view_count":117,"doi":17,"paper":172,"created_at":180},4283,"农户数字融入的驱动因素及其路径构型——基于29县微观调研数据的QCA分析","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F176788.html","武永超、江章榕、徐明泽(西北农林科技大学、哈工大、中国科大)以29个县农户作为研究对象，基于TOE框架运用fsQCA方法探究农户数字融入的驱动要素及其多元路径。研究发现：单一要素不足以提升农户数字融入水平；驱动路径具有非唯一性，表现为环境-服务耦合型、环境-领导驱动型、综合协同助推型、组织-环境互构型四条典型路径；存在组织脱耦型、技术悬浮型、激励真空型、三重塌陷型四类抑制陷阱。","干旱区资源与环境 2026年第02期","2026-10-01T00:00:00Z",{"impact":148,"substance":26,"depth":149,"authority":150,"freshness":117,"relevant":8,"comment":151},16,19,14,"基于29县微观数据的fsQCA研究，方法规范、结论具政策参考价值，但属学术论文且时效偏旧，适合主题聚合而非每日精选。",[153],{"name":145,"url":143},[155,156,4,157,158],"数字乡村","数字鸿沟","TOE框架","农户数字融入",[],{"status":102,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":161},{"candidates":162,"agricultural_evidence":111,"reason":112},[163],{"code":164,"score":107,"supported":22,"title":165,"abstract":166,"tags":167},"I6",[],[],[155,156],[169,170],"农户数字融入 驱动路径","西北农林科技大学 数字乡村 调研","农户数字融入驱动路径-4283",{"doi":17,"openalex_id":17,"authors":173,"venue":17,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":17,"card":174,"direction":77,"ingested_from":179},[],{"tldr":175,"method":176,"finding":177,"direction":77,"opportunity":178},"基于29县农户调研，用fsQCA分析农户数字融入的驱动因素与路径构型。","TOE框架与fsQCA方法，29县微观调研数据。","单一要素不足，存在四条驱动路径与四类抑制陷阱。","可探究不同区域数字融入路径的时空演化，及抑制陷阱的动态转化机制。","agent","2026-10-06T00:05:04.724411Z",{"id":182,"title":183,"url":184,"summary":185,"summary_zh":17,"content":17,"source_name":186,"source_url":17,"published_at":187,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":188,"score_detail":189,"sources":191,"tags":193,"primary_topic":17,"secondary_topics":198,"classification":199,"search_phrases":212,"slug":215,"view_count":216,"doi":17,"paper":217,"created_at":224},3753,"新疆棉农智能化技术采纳行为影响因素与组态路径研究","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F176828.html","基于428份新疆棉农微观调研数据，构建外部环境-主体认知-行为响应分析框架，结合PLS-SEM和fsQCA方法。政策支持、社会规范以及技术可及性构成外部驱动，自我效能和价值感知直接促进技术采纳并发挥中介效应。识别出社会学习与能力主导型和外部支持与效益主导型两种模式。","干旱区资源与环境","2026-04-15T00:00:00Z",67,{"impact":148,"substance":90,"depth":91,"authority":28,"freshness":72,"relevant":8,"comment":190},"基于428份新疆棉农调研、PLS-SEM与fsQCA结合，方法规范结论有新意，但发表已逾五个月，时效性不足，难以进入每日精选。",[192],{"name":186,"url":184},[194,195,4,196,197],"智慧农业","技术采纳","棉农","新疆棉花",[],{"status":40,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":200},{"candidates":201,"agricultural_evidence":22,"reason":55},[202,207],{"code":203,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":204,"abstract":205,"tags":206},"G1",[],[],[195],{"code":208,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":209,"abstract":210,"tags":211},"I1",[],[],[194],[213,214],"新疆棉农 技术采纳","智慧农业 棉农 调研","新疆棉农技术采纳-3753",5,{"doi":17,"openalex_id":17,"authors":218,"venue":17,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":17,"card":219,"direction":77,"ingested_from":179},[],{"tldr":220,"method":221,"finding":222,"direction":77,"opportunity":223},"基于428份新疆棉农调研数据，研究棉农智能化技术采纳行为的影响因素与组态路径。","428份微观调研数据，PLS-SEM与fsQCA结合，构建外部环境-主体认知-行","政策支持、社会规范、技术可及性为外部驱动，自我效能与价值感知有中介效应，识别出两类组态模式。","可拓展至不同作物或地区，比较组态路径差异，并追踪采纳行为的动态演化与绩效。","2026-09-29T00:08:27.040886Z",{"id":226,"title":227,"url":228,"summary":229,"summary_zh":17,"content":17,"source_name":230,"source_url":17,"published_at":231,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":232,"score_detail":233,"sources":236,"tags":238,"primary_topic":242,"secondary_topics":248,"classification":249,"search_phrases":273,"slug":276,"view_count":277,"doi":17,"paper":278,"created_at":286},3443,"《数字赋能农业碳减排的组态效应分析》——基于河南省各省辖市2011—2022年数据","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F174647.html","孟凡琳、赵冰冰、李炳军利用碳排放因子法测度2011—2022年河南省各省辖市农业碳排放量，运用模糊集定性比较分析法（fsQCA）分析数字赋能河南农业碳减排的组态效应。结果：河南省农业碳排放强度在2011—2022年总体呈下降趋势，化肥施用和翻耕是主要来源；农业碳排放强度降低是数字基础设施、技术创新、农业数字化和数字金融多因素相互耦合结果；2011—2015年完善的数字基础设施是核心驱动因素，2016—2022年农业数字化的碳减排作用更为显著。","《河南农业大学学报》2026年第2期","2026-09-20T00:00:00Z",76,{"impact":148,"substance":26,"depth":27,"authority":150,"freshness":234,"relevant":8,"comment":235},6,"基于河南18个省辖市11年面板数据的fsQCA组态研究，方法规范、结论有新意，对数字乡村与农业低碳政策有参考价值，但属省级区域实证，影响力有限。",[237],{"name":230,"url":228},[155,239,240,241,4],"农业碳减排","农业数字化","河南农业",{"code":243,"slug":244,"name":245,"path":246,"parent_code":247},"H4","carbon","农业碳与绿色低碳","\u002Ftopic\u002Fenvironment\u002Fcarbon","H",[],{"status":250,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":251},"classified",{"candidates":252,"agricultural_evidence":111},[253,260,265,269],{"code":243,"score":254,"supported":111,"title":255,"abstract":257,"tags":259},15,[256],"农业碳",[258,256],"碳排放",[239],{"code":261,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":262,"abstract":263,"tags":264},"I",[],[],[240],{"code":208,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":266,"abstract":267,"tags":268},[],[],[240],{"code":164,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":270,"abstract":271,"tags":272},[],[],[155],[274,275],"河南 农业碳排放 数字赋能","河南农业大学学报 农业碳减排","河南农业碳排放数字赋能-3443",4,{"doi":17,"openalex_id":17,"authors":279,"venue":17,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":17,"card":280,"direction":284,"ingested_from":179},[],{"tldr":281,"method":282,"finding":283,"direction":284,"opportunity":285},"基于河南2011-2022年数据，用fsQCA分析数字赋能农业碳减排的组态效应。","碳排放因子法测度碳排放，模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）。","碳强度总体下降，化肥和翻耕为主源；减排是多因素耦合，核心驱动从数字基建转向农业数字化。","农业绿色发展与碳","可拓展至多省比较或结合面板数据，探究数字技术减排组态的时空异质性与因果机制。","2026-09-25T00:09:34.373665Z",{"id":288,"title":289,"url":290,"summary":291,"summary_zh":17,"content":17,"source_name":292,"source_url":17,"published_at":231,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":293,"score_detail":294,"sources":296,"tags":298,"primary_topic":17,"secondary_topics":302,"classification":303,"search_phrases":319,"slug":322,"view_count":234,"doi":17,"paper":323,"created_at":330},3432,"《数字赋能乡村有效治理研究——基于121份全国乡村治理典型案例的实证分析解释》","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.qikanvip.com\u002Fqkml\u002F165469.html","李燕凌、张芳清基于包容性治理理论构建'数字—包容'乡村有效治理分析框架，以121份全国乡村治理典型案例为样本，运用模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）方法探讨数字权力包容、数字机会包容和数字权利包容对乡村有效治理的组态路径，并提炼出'权力结构优化型'及'权利表达驱动型'两条组态路径，发现高水平乡村治理效能并非依赖单一要素而是多条件耦合结果。","《农业经济与管理》2026年第2期",77,{"impact":27,"substance":26,"depth":27,"authority":150,"freshness":216,"relevant":8,"comment":295},"基于121份全国典型案例的fsQCA组态分析，方法规范、结论有新意，对数字乡村治理研究有参考价值，但属学术论文且时效稍弱，适合主题聚合而非头条精选。",[297],{"name":292,"url":290},[155,299,300,301,4],"乡村治理","数字赋能","典型案例",[],{"status":40,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":304},{"candidates":305,"agricultural_evidence":22,"reason":55},[306,311,315],{"code":307,"score":25,"supported":111,"title":308,"abstract":309,"tags":310},"G5",[299],[299],[299],{"code":208,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":312,"abstract":313,"tags":314},[],[],[300],{"code":164,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":316,"abstract":317,"tags":318},[],[],[155],[320,321],"李燕凌 数字包容 乡村治理","全国乡村治理典型案例 fsQCA","李燕凌数字包容乡村治理-3432",{"doi":17,"openalex_id":17,"authors":324,"venue":17,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":17,"card":325,"direction":77,"ingested_from":179},[],{"tldr":326,"method":327,"finding":328,"direction":77,"opportunity":329},"基于121份全国乡村治理典型案例，用fsQCA揭示数字包容赋能乡村有效治理的组态路径。","包容性治理理论框架+fsQCA，分析121份全国乡村治理典型案例。","高水平治理效能源于数字权力、机会、权利包容的多条件耦合，形成两条组态路径。","可拓展数字包容组态路径在不同区域与治理场景下的适用性，并追踪其动态演化机制。","2026-09-25T00:09:33.496627Z",{"id":332,"title":333,"url":334,"summary":335,"summary_zh":336,"content":17,"source_name":18,"source_url":334,"published_at":337,"category":20,"cover_url":17,"hotness":21,"is_selected":22,"score":293,"score_detail":338,"sources":340,"tags":342,"primary_topic":346,"secondary_topics":350,"classification":351,"search_phrases":380,"slug":383,"view_count":117,"doi":384,"paper":385,"created_at":395},3345,"E-commerce digitalization for sustainable agricultural and rural development: models and pathways","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1743839","This study adopts the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework as its core meso-level integrated explanatory framework, embedding digital empowerment theory to guide variable selection and causal logic. Meanwhile, it classifies the core conditional variables into technological capabilities, organizational capabilities, and environmental\u002Fstructural factors, avoiding the stacking of practical dimensions in variable selection. We find that sustainable agricultural and rural development (SARD) outcomes are not driven by single factors but by the synergistic effect of multiple configurations. Analysis identifies three distinct pathways: digital technology and agile response-driven, service and channel optimization, and comprehensive synergy. The most effective pathway synergistically combines high channel integration, high digitalization of service experience, high marketing response agility, and high precision in consumer insight. These pathways enhance agricultural marketing efficiency and advance SARD across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Furthermore, substitution effects exist among some auxiliary factors; for instance, depth of digital technology application and precision of consumer insight can be functionally equivalent in the digital technology and agile response-driven pathway. The core theoretical contribution of this study is breaking through the traditional linear cognition of single-factor driving in the research of digital agriculture and SARD, which is prevalent in both domestic and international academia. By adopting the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method, we identify and theorize three typical configurational driving archetypes of e-commerce-driven SARD, namely Technology-Agile type, Service-Optimized type and Comprehensive Synergy type, reveal the mechanisms of multiple concurrent causality and equifinal paths in the digital empowerment of SARD, supplement the configurational analysis perspective for the digital empowerment theory, and provide micro-practical support for the sustainable transition theory in the context of global digital agriculture and platformization development. We recommend that agricultural enterprises strengthen digital technology, build distinctive product identities based on consumer insights, and enhance service experiences to foster sustainable transitions.","本研究以技术-组织-环境(TOE)框架为核心的中层整合解释框架，嵌入数字赋能理论以指导变量选择与因果逻辑。同时，将核心条件变量归类为技术能力、组织能力和环境\u002F结构因素，避免变量选择中实践维度的堆叠。研究发现，农业农村可持续发展(SARD)成效并非由单一因素驱动，而是多重条件组合的协同效应所致。分析识别出三条差异化路径：数字技术与敏捷响应驱动型、服务与渠道优化型、综合协同型。其中最有效的路径协同组合了高渠道整合度、高服务体验数字化、高营销响应敏捷性和高消费者洞察精准度。这些路径提升了农产品营销效率，并在经济、社会和环境维度上推进了SARD。此外，部分辅助因素之间存在替代效应；例如，在数字技术与敏捷响应驱动型路径中，数字技术应用深度与消费者洞察精准度可在功能上等效。本研究的核心理论贡献在于突破了国内外学术界在数字农业与SARD研究中普遍存在的单因素驱动的传统线性认知。通过采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法，我们识别并理论化了电子商务驱动SARD的三种典型组态驱动原型，即技术-敏捷型、服务-优化型和综合协同型，揭示了数字赋能SARD中多重并发因果与等效路径的机制，为数字赋能理论补充了组态分析视角，并为全球数字农业与平台化发展背景下的可持续转型理论提供了微观实践支撑。我们建议农业企业强化数字技术，基于消费者洞察构建特色产品标识，并提升服务体验以促进可持续转型。","2026-09-23T00:00:00Z",{"impact":148,"substance":90,"depth":27,"authority":28,"freshness":29,"relevant":8,"comment":339},"基于TOE框架与fsQCA方法揭示电商驱动农业农村可持续发展的三条组态路径，方法新颖、结论有理论增量，对数字乡村与农村电商实践具参考价值。",[341],{"name":18,"url":334},[343,344,155,345,4],"数字农业","农村电商","可持续农业",{"code":208,"slug":347,"name":348,"path":349,"parent_code":261},"smart-agriculture","智慧农业总论","\u002Ftopic\u002Fdigital-agriculture\u002Fsmart-agriculture",[],{"status":250,"locked":22,"version":41,"method":42,"evidence":352},{"candidates":353,"agricultural_evidence":111},[354,361,366,371,376],{"code":355,"score":356,"supported":111,"title":357,"abstract":359,"tags":360},"G",11,[358],"rural development",[358],[],{"code":208,"score":7,"supported":111,"title":362,"abstract":363,"tags":365},[],[343,364],"digital agriculture",[343],{"code":367,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":368,"abstract":369,"tags":370},"E5",[],[],[344],{"code":372,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":373,"abstract":374,"tags":375},"H8",[],[],[345],{"code":164,"score":8,"supported":22,"title":377,"abstract":378,"tags":379},[],[],[155],[381,382],"农村电商 数字赋能 可持续发展","电商 农业营销 数字化转型","农村电商数字赋能可持续发展-3345","10.3389\u002Ffsufs.2026.1743839",{"doi":384,"openalex_id":386,"authors":387,"venue":18,"cited_by_count":72,"oa_url":334,"card":390,"direction":77,"ingested_from":79},"W7214123656",[388],{"name":389,"orcid":17},"Qian Shan",{"tldr":391,"method":392,"finding":393,"direction":77,"opportunity":394},"基于TOE框架与fsQCA，识别电商数字化驱动农业农村可持续发展的三条组态路径。","TOE框架、数字赋能理论、fsQCA方法，分析多条件组态。","高渠道整合、高服务体验数字化、高营销响应敏捷与高消费者洞察精准组合最有效，存在替代效应。","可探究不同区域或平台情境下组态路径的适用边界，以及替代效应的动态演化机制。","2026-09-24T23:30:08.046331Z"]