数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型研究综述

欢迎您访问《智慧农业（中英文）》官方网站！English

Toggle navigation智慧农业

• 网站首页
• 期刊介绍
• 编委会
• 投稿指南
• 期刊服务
• 下载中心
• 联系我们

Smart Agriculture ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 119-131.doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202512008

• 专刊--数字技术赋能与农业经济范式转型 •上一篇下一篇

数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型研究综述

丁凡琳 1,2()

1. 1. 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院，天津 300350，中国

2. 南开大学计算社会科学实验室，天津 300350，中国

• 收稿日期:2025-12-09 出版日期:2026-05-30

• 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(72404151); 中央专项资金项目(63262094)

• 通信作者:丁凡琳，博士，副教授，研究方向为低碳治理、城乡融合、数字治理。E-mail：[email protected]

The Low-Carbon Transition of Rural Residents' Lifestyle through Digital Empowerment: A Review

DING Fanlin 1,2()

1. 1. Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China

2. Nankai University Computational Social Science Laboratory, Tianjin 300350, China

• Received:2025-12-09 Online:2026-05-30

• Foundation items:National Natural Science Foundation of China(72404151)

• Corresponding author:DING Fanlin, E-mail: [email protected]

在线阅读 3

知网下载

本地下载 21

## 可视化 0

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的/意义】 确立“双碳”目标以来，促进居民生活方式低碳转型成为高质量发展的重要议题。本文通过对国内外相关文献的述评，旨在归纳当前农村居民生活方式低碳转型的难点与数字化赋能的可行路径，为该领域研究及相关政策设计提供参考。 【进展】 通过梳理居民行为研究的主流理论与研究进展，提出当前农村居民生活方式低碳转型的难点主要表现为居民行为需要外部因素强刺激和意识转变还需内在认知渐浸润。进而从数字技术、数字平台两个维度探究数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型的可行性，并从国家和地方层面对低碳行为驱动政策的研究进行了评述。 【结论/展望】 数字化发展可以通过数字技术提升居民生活体验与效率、以数字金融产品与服务形成新兴载体、以信息的数字化传播扩展认知空间，以及数字社交潜移默化转变固有观念等赋能路径对农村居民生活方式转型形成助力。未来研究还可以从农村居民特征适配的意识与行为引导、生活场景中数字化驱动的深度挖掘、数字化影响的异质性，以及减碳政策的双向优化等角度开展。

关键词:数字技术,低碳转型,数字乡村,“双碳”,数字平台,碳排放

Abstract:

[Significance] Since the establishment of the "dual carbon" goals, promoting the low-carbon transformation of lifestyles has become a core issue of green and high-quality development. However, most existing studies selected urban residents as the research subject for investigating low-carbon behaviors, systematic exploration from the perspective of rural residents needs to be supplemented. The implementation of the Digital Rural Development Strategy creates favorable conditions for digital empowerment in the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' lifestyles. Based on the perspective of rural residents' behavior, this paper systematically sorts out relevant literature, aiming to explore the core difficulties of rural residents' lifestyle low-carbon transformation and the feasible paths of digital empowerment, so as to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for the deepening of research in this field and the optimization of relevant policies. [Progress] Firstly, the mainstream theories and research findings were reviewed on resident behavior, concluding that existing studies mostly focus on urban residents, with insufficient relevance analysis and in-depth discussion in rural contexts. Secondly, the core dilemmas in the low-carbon lifestyle transformation of rural residents were analyzed from the two dimensions of behavior and cognition. At the behavioral level, rural residents have low acceptance of new low-carbon practices; their behavioral decisions are strongly influenced by social relations such as regional and kinship ties, and external strong stimuli are needed to drive behavioral change. At the cognitive level, rural residents have limited exposure to low-carbon knowledge, which hinders the formation of low-carbon awareness. Meanwhile, there is a significant deviation between low-carbon cognition and actual behavior, and more external incentives are required for rural residents to translate awareness into action. The proposal of the Digital Countryside has provided hardware infrastructure and policy support for digitally driving the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' behavior. Accordingly, the common enabling scenarios of digitalization were further sorted out in rural life and explored feasible paths for the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' behavior in the digital era. From one aspect, embedding digital technologies and their derivative products is a measure to reshape residents' living habits. Specifically, digital technologies can optimize residents' daily life experience and improve efficiency, while digital financial products and services can lower the costs of low-carbon practices for rural residents. From another aspect, leveraging digital platforms as communication channels helps gradually cultivate residents' low-carbon awareness. This is reflected in the efficient dissemination of information that expands rural residents' scope of low-carbon knowledge, and digital social interactions that transform their traditional mindsets. Finally, China's current policy system related to guiding residents' low-carbon behavior was reviewed and evaluated. It is characterized by national macro-plans that set the overall development direction, and local policies that focus on strengthening digital infrastructure construction. [Conclusions and Prospects] Digitalization can accurately address the behavioral and cognition difficulties in the low-carbon transformation of rural residents' lifestyles through four paths: technology embedding, financial empowerment, information dissemination, and social guidance. Future research needs to further expand the applicability of low-carbon behavior theories in rural scenarios, verify the carbon reduction effect and heterogeneous impact of digitalization in rural living scenarios, and construct a two-way interactive digital carbon reduction policy system featuring government guidance and resident participation, so as to provide more targeted theoretical support and policy ideas for the coordinated development of rural residents' lifestyle low-carbon transformation and rural revitalization.

Key words:digital technology,low-carbon transition,digital countryside,"dual carbon",digital platform,carbon emissions

中图分类号:

• F323.8

• X24

引用本文

丁凡琳. 数字化背景下农村居民生活方式低碳转型研究综述[J]. 智慧农业(中英文), 2026, 8(3): 119-131.

DING Fanlin. The Low-Carbon Transition of Rural Residents' Lifestyle through Digital Empowerment: A Review[J]. Smart Agriculture, 2026, 8(3): 119-131.

使用本文

[收藏文章](javascript:;) /[推荐](javascript:void(null))
导出引用管理器EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文:https://www.smartag.net.cn/CN/10.12133/j.smartag.SA202512008

https://www.smartag.net.cn/CN/Y2026/V8/I3/119

[图/表 1](javascript:;)

表1

农村居民行为与认知相关研究文献

研究主题	研究进展	主要参考文献
农村居民行为特征分析	基于经济学、行为学理论分析农村居民行为特征及其影响因素，通过与城市居民比较得出，影响农村居民行为的因素存在差异且更为复杂	唐博文和郭军［20］，黄赜琳和秦淑悦［21］，程名望和张家平［22］，臧旭恒和裴春霞［23］，胡日东等［24］
社会关系与群体行为对农村居民影响较农村尤为凸显。不同于城市居民，对于农村居民行为动因的研究需要将地缘、血缘等社会因素考虑在内	贾晋等［25］，POOL和SCHWEGLER［26］，LI［27］，QIAN等［28］，滕玉华等［29］
农村居民认知场景分析	当前农村居民环保行为主要表现在节能或使用清洁能源方面，以受成本驱动为主，意识驱动路径有待强化。低碳信息的农村居民可触达度不足、缺少价值认同是居民低碳认知难以形成的原因	蒋琳莉等［19］，黄河等［30］，孙玉栋和王宣桦［31］，易芳馨等［32］
由于农村碳排放数据统计监测体系不完善、农村低碳技术创新和应用推广不足，可获得低碳信息的场景有限。这使得农村居民的低碳意识有待提升，低碳消费、垃圾分类等相关行为实施存在积极性不足、参与度低问题	ZHANG等［33］，SCHUWE和LEFKOFF-HAGIUS［34］，岳婷等［35］，贾亚娟等［36］

表1

[参考文献 96](javascript:;)

[1]MUNKSGAARD J, PEDERSEN K A. CO 2 accounts for open economies: Producer or consumer responsibility [J]. Energy Policy, 2001, 29(4): 327-334.
[2]张赫, 张建勋, 王睿, 等. 小城市建成环境对居民出行交通碳排放的影响机理[J]. 城市问题, 2020(7): 4-10, 20.
ZHANG H, ZHANG J X, WANG R, et al. Built environment factors influencing CO 2 emissions from residential trips in small Chinese cities[J]. Urban Problems, 2020(7): 4-10, 20.
[3]谭涛, 张燕媛, 唐若迪, 等. 中国农村居民家庭消费结构分析: 基于QUAIDS模型的两阶段一致估计[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(9): 17-31, 56.
TAN T, ZHANG Y Y, TANG R D. An analysis of the consumption structure of Chinese rural households: Two-stage consistent estimation based on the QUAIDS Model[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014(9): 17-31, 56.
[4]张腾, 蒋伏心, 韦朕韬. 数字经济能否成为促进我国经济高质量发展的新动能 [J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(1): 25-39.
ZHANG T, JIANG F X, WEI Z T. Can digital economy become a new driving force for China's high-quality economic development [J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2021(1): 25-39.
[5]邵美红, 吴芊颖, 赵福建, 等. 我国农田碳排放现状及固碳减排技术分析[J]. 智能化农业装备学报(中英文), 2025, 6(1): 99-110.
SHAO M H, WU Q Y, ZHAO F J, et al. A review of current GHG emissions in Chinese farmland and the carbon sequestration and emission reduction technologies[J]. Journal of Intelligent Agricultural Mechanization, 2025, 6(1): 99-110.
[6]崔亚飞, 黄少安, 吴琼. 农户亲环境意向的影响因素及其效应分解研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(12): 45-49.
CUI Y F, HUANG S A, WU Q. Influencing factors and the effects of Chinese farmer's pro-environmental intention[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(12): 45-49.
[7]AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[8]AJZEN I. Attitudes, personality and behaviour[M].Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988.
[9]WILLIS L, LEE E, REYNOLDS K J, et al. The theory of planned behavior and the social identity approach: A new look at group processes and social norms in the context of student binge drinking[J]. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2020, 16(3): 357-383.
[10]ARMITAGE C J, CONNER M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40(Pt 4): 471-499.
[11]GUAGNANO G A, STERN P C, DIETZ T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1995, 27(5): 699-718.
[12]VAN LIERE K D, DUNLAP R E. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence[J]. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1980, 44(2): 181-197.
[13]边俊杰, 段可仪. 城镇居民节能行为、能源效率缺口与公共政策——基于国内30个省份城镇居民的调查[J]. 财政科学, 2023(11): 131-146.
BIAN J J, DUAN K Y. Energy saving behavior, energy efficiency gap and public policies of urban residents: Based on a survey of urban residents in 30 provinces in China[J]. Fiscal Science, 2023(11): 131-146.
[14]王小华, 温涛. 城乡居民消费行为及结构演化的差异研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, 32(10): 90-107.
WANG X H, WEN T. The evolution of differences about consumption behavior and consumption structure between urban and rural residents[J]. Journal of Quantitative Technological Economics, 2015, 32(10): 90-107.
[15]彭远春. 城市居民环境认知对环境行为的影响分析[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 21(3): 168-174.
PENG Y C. Analysis of the influence of urban residents' environmental cognition on environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Central South University (Social Science), 2015, 21(3): 168-174.
[16]WILSON A L, BUCKLEY E, BUCKLEY J D, et al. Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 51: 47-64.
[17]句华. 助推理论与政府购买公共服务政策创新[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 43(2): 74-80.
JU H. Nudge theory and policy innovation in government purchase of public services[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 43(2): 74-80.
[18]WANG J S. Nudging for social change: Promises and cautions for social workers to apply behavioural economic tools[J]. The British Journal of Social Work, 2023, 53(2): 775-793.
[19]蒋琳莉, 张露, 张俊飚, 等. 稻农低碳生产行为的影响机理研究——基于湖北省102户稻农的深度访谈[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(4): 86-101.
JIANG L L, ZHANG L, ZHANG J B, et al. The influence mechanism of rice farmers' low-carbon production behaviors: An analysis based on in-depth interviews with 102 rice farmers in Hubei Province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(4): 86-101.
[20]唐博文, 郭军. 如何扩大农村内需: 基于农村居民家庭消费的视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(3): 73-87.
TANG B W, GUO J. How to expand rural domestic demand: From the perspective of rural household consumption[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(3): 73-87.
[21]黄赜琳, 秦淑悦. 市场一体化对消费升级的影响——基于"量"与"质"的双重考察[J]. 中国人口科学, 2021, 35(5): 18-31, 126.
HUANG Z L, QIN S Y. The impact of market integration on consumption upgrading: A study based on "quantity" and "quality"[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2021, 35(5): 18-31, 126.
[22]程名望, 张家平. ICT服务业资本存量及其产出弹性估算研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 189-199.
CHENG M W, ZHANG J P. Study on the estimation of ICT service industry capital stock and it's output elasticity[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11): 189-199.
[23]臧旭恒, 裴春霞. 转轨时期中国城乡居民消费行为比较研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2007, 24(1): 65-72, 91.
ZANG X H, PEI C X. The consumption study of Chinese urban and rural households consumption behavior in transitional period[J]. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 2007, 24(1): 65-72, 91.
[24]胡日东, 钱明辉, 郑永冰. 中国城乡收入差距对城乡居民消费结构的影响——基于LA/AIDS拓展模型的实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(5): 75-87.
HU R D, QIAN M H, ZHENG Y B. The effect of urban-rural income gap on consumption structure of urban and rural residents in China: Empirical analysis based on extended LA/AIDS model[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2014, 40(5): 75-87.
[25]贾晋, 温虎, 张齐圣. 正规信贷对农村家庭消费隐含碳排放的影响效应分析——来自中国农村家庭追踪调查数据的证据[J]. 农村经济, 2022(9): 98-106.
JIA J, WEN H, ZHANG Q S. Analysis of the impact of formal credit on implicit carbon emissions from rural household consumption: Evidence from China family panel studies[J]. Rural Economy, 2022, 98(9): 98-106.
[26]POOL G J, SCHWEGLER A F. Differentiating among motives for norm conformity[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2007, 29(1): 47-60.
[27]LI C H. China: The consumer revolution[M]. Singapore: Wiley, 1998.
[28]QIAN W, ABDUR RAZZAQUE M, KENG KAH. Chinese cultural values and gift-giving behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2007, 24(4): 214-228.
[29]滕玉华, 吴素婷, 范世晶, 等. 基于解释结构模型的农村居民生活自愿亲环境行为发生机制研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11): 34-40.
TENG Y H, WU S T, FAN S J, et al. The occurrence mechanism of rural residents' living voluntary pro-environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(11): 34-40.
[30]黄河, 刘琳琳, 杨小涵. 情感驱动的实践——城市居民绿色低碳行为促进机制的ARI模型检验[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2023, 10(2): 60-86.
HUANG H, LIU L L, YANG X H. Affect driven public engagement: An empirical study of urban residents' low-carbon behavior promotion mechanism based on ARI model[J]. Global Journal of Media Studies, 2023, 10(2): 60-86.
[31]孙玉栋, 王宣桦. 数字普惠金融赋能乡村振兴的实践价值、现实挑战与政策因应[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2023(1): 112-120.
SUN Y D, WANG X H. The practical value and practical challenges of digital inclusive finance enabling rural revitalization and the policy response to it[J]. Journal of Beijing Administration Institute, 2023(1): 112-120.
[32]易芳馨, 张强, 李瑶, 等. 基于数字驱动的低碳社区治理体系与治理能力提升路径[J]. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(6): 133-140.
YI F X, ZHANG Q, LI Y, et al. The high-quality development path of low-carbon communities: A policy implementation framework based on digital driving and behavioral nudging[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(6): 133-140.
[33]ZHANG M S, ZHENG Q, XIA-BAUER C. A systematic assessment of low-carbon energy consumption by an integrated approach in rural China[J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 12: 5704-5711.
[34]SCHUHWERK M E, LEFKOFF-HAGIUS R. Green or non-green : Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product [J]. Journal of Advertising, 1995, 24(2): 45-54.
[35]岳婷, 周静, 张新悦, 等. 城市居民低碳涉入: 内涵、维度与影响因素[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(10): 50-62.
YUE T, ZHOU J, ZHANG X Y, et al. Low-carbon involvement of urban residents: Concept, dimensions and influencing factors[J]. Management Review, 2025, 37(10): 50-62.
[36]贾亚娟, 范子珺, 张新奇. 环境价值观对居民绿色低碳生活方式选择意愿的影响——基于环境态度的中介作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(12): 1-9.
JIA Y J, FAN Z J, ZHANG X Q. Influence of environmental values on residents' willingness to choose green and low-carbon lifestyle: Environmental attitudes-based mediation effect[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(12): 1-9.
[37]何广文. 从农村居民资金借贷行为看农村金融抑制与金融深化[J]. 中国农村经济, 1999(10): 42-48.
HE G W. Financial repression and financial deepening in rural areas from the perspective of rural residents' fund borrowing behavior[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 1999(10): 42-48.
[38]廖华. 中国农村居民生活用能现状、问题与应对[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(2): 1-5.
LIAO H. Residential energy consumption in rural China: Situation, problems and solutions[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 21(2): 1-5.
[39]VIARDOT E. The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 63: 756-764.
[40]LĂZĂROIU G, NEGURIŢĂ O, GRECU I, et al. Consumers' decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11: 890.
[41]DABBOUS A, TARHINI A. Does sharing economy promote sustainable economic development and energy efficiency Evidence from OECD countries[J]. Journal of Innovation Knowledge, 2021, 6(1): 58-68.
[42]WU Y N, XU M J, TAO Y, et al. A critical barrier analysis framework to the development of rural distrib